Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
→‎BlueVine: new section
Line 398: Line 398:
*{{revisions|BlueVine}}
*{{revisions|BlueVine}}
''I, Golden tamarin, request the undeletion of this [[WP:Drafts|draft]] or [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[User:Golden tamarin|Golden tamarin]] ([[User talk:Golden tamarin|talk]]) 18:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
''I, Golden tamarin, request the undeletion of this [[WP:Drafts|draft]] or [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.'' [[User:Golden tamarin|Golden tamarin]] ([[User talk:Golden tamarin|talk]]) 18:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

== BlueVine ==

*{{revisions|BlueVine}}
The entry is blank and I'd like to create a new, complete entry —[[User:Golden tamarin|Golden tamarin]] ([[User talk:Golden tamarin|talk]]) 18:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:39, 20 October 2017

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts
    "WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion

    Draft:Carpet Mills Arts District

    I, Rachelautumn, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rachelautumn (talk) 01:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Outside GC

    I, Lynnkuzneski, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lynnkuzneski (talk) 15:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Lynnkuzneski: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft: Big Frog Franchise Group

    I was not finished creating the article Alyssaw212 (talk) 17:25, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Alyssaw212: You'll need to work on it else it will be deleted again in six months, and you will have a much harder case to make to restore it. For now: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:09, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Thirtysomething (disambiguation)

    Is the deleted dabpage (almost) similar to Thirty-something (disambiguation)? If so, can the deleted logs be transferred to that newer dabpage? —George Ho (talk) 20:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @George Ho:  Done, histories merged (including the talk page). ~Anachronist (talk) 20:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    PH Games

    Deleted as a hoax, and it was a rather queer one if I recall. Can this be archived to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/PH Games? —Adam9007 (talk) 01:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Fontself

    I, FranzHoffman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FranzHoffman (talk) 09:57, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I, Venitkol, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Venitkol (talk) 15:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Muhammet Ali Mevlüt Dündar

    I would like to create the article but noticed it has been Speedy deleted, can it be restored so that I can add to it? —Aca rblx (talk) 20:58, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

      • I don't like restoring these, it tends to encourage the banned user who created the article when they shouldn't be editing at all. However I won't object if another admin wants to restore it. Hut 8.5 20:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Bernardo Urbina

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the this page is a legit source of information. Bernardo aurbina is a reknowed furniture designer. He has been featured in the NY times. He studied in Pratt institute later gpt a masters in politecnico di milano and relocated for 3 years to Philippines before starting his Brand in Costa Rica.

    Save page" button below —201.191.198.239 (talk) 21:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Stephen Matthew Gill

    I, LadyMay, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. LadyMay (talk) 02:37, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Codeproof

    Draft:Codeproof

    I, Shilpacs, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shilpacs (talk) 05:44, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WWICS_Group_of_Companies

    Its a normal company page which represents WWICS group , consisting of Various Companies, the intention to keep this page was to make people aware about WWICS group and not promoting company or Its Services, However targeting WWICS group of companies a claim has been made that it just reflects information from Company Website however you can check the website http://www.wwicsgroup.com/ the content is no where taken from website or representing anything which is available on website , requesting page restoration —Abhinav Poonia 07:20, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWICS Group of Companies, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:59, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Regional Democracy

    I, 62.253.255.124, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 62.253.255.124 (talk) 11:51, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Eminemshakethat.jpg

    I'm currently fixing errors in the music templates and spotted this error. The file was speedy deleted as F5: Unused non-free media file for more than 7 days in 2016. - The template fields in the article had been messed up by a user at that time, making it impossible for the image to be displayed. The user added a Misc = field to the Track Listing template, which meant that the Extra Cover template couldn't function. This file was deleted in error and should be restored. —X201 (talk) 11:53, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Peter Mimi

    This is a famous film director why his article was deleted Is it possible to create an article about him? —156.216.188.93 (talk) 00:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Yes, it is possible. Start over, preferably at Draft:Peter Mimi and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. This one was deleted for being promotional. Wikipedia should never be used for publicity or promotion. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:10, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Alexander Monteith (surgeon)

    I believe this page was speedy deleted in error.No reasons were given and I cannot think of any reason why it should be deleted. I'd be grateful if it could be restored. If this is not agreed please send me the reasons and email a copy of the article to me Papamac (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Iainmacintyre:  Done, restored. It wasn't deleted in error, it was deleted because you blanked it, which is interpreted as a request to delete in accordance with WP:G7. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    List of Powerhouse Films releases

    The aim of the page is to create an article exactly the same as that which exists for Arrow Films found here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_Films. Powerhouse Films is also a UK distributor of classic, horror, and cult films on Blu-ray and DVD. If a page is required for Powerhouse Films similar to that of Arrow Films this can also be created e.g. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_Films. It would useful to understand why these pages are allowed but not for those of Powerhouse Films as the aim in creating such pages is to serve the same function. —Rockwell05 (talk) 18:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Rockwell05 You might try to make an article on the company, not just a list of films. Please do it as a draft via the WP:Article Wizard, not in mainspace. DGG ( talk ) 21:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Günter Bechly

    I am a researcher interested in the relationship between science and Wikipedia and wanted to see not so much the article for Günter Bechly, but the rather its talk page and edit history. I know it was deleted due to WP:CAN after pro-IDers flocked to the page. It is these processes that preceded the article's deletion that interest me for academic purposes. Is there any way to receive access to an already deleted talk page? And, more importantly, to the different edits that were made overtime (i.e. the changelgo)? —Wikigenstein (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC) Wikigenstein (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

    (diff) 06:01, 14 October 2017 . . JJMC89 (talk | contribs ) (657 bytes) (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G8). | TW)
(diff) 15:20, 13 October 2017 . . PaleoNeonate (talk | contribs ) (645 bytes) (title, sign, reply)
(diff) 14:20, 13 October 2017 . . 178.157.250.81 (talk ) (41 bytes) (←Created page with 'Where is the page? Why has it been moved?')
(diff) 15:11, 23 March 2017 . . Kevmin (talk | contribs ) (3,685 bytes) (→‎Notability?)
(diff) 13:17, 23 March 2017 . . Oharar (talk | contribs ) (3,191 bytes)
(diff) 17:35, 26 April 2015 . . Hza a 9 (talk | contribs ) (2,852 bytes)
(diff) 17:19, 21 August 2012 . . Dr. Günter Bechly (talk | contribs ) (2,747 bytes) (→‎Article by the subject: odonate phylogeny is ...)
(diff) 13:19, 21 August 2012 . . Brookie (talk | contribs ) (2,192 bytes) (→‎Article by the subject: Thanks - is there an article to be created in your PhD subject odonate phylogeny? I have no idea what it is!)
(diff) 11:06, 21 August 2012 . . Dr. Günter Bechly (talk | contribs ) (1,823 bytes) (→‎Article by the subject: response by subject)
(diff) 08:22, 20 August 2012 . . Brookie (talk | contribs ) (980 bytes) (The subject is now openly editing the article)
(diff) 12:40, 14 August 2012 . . PKT (talk | contribs ) m (678 bytes)
(diff) 12:40, 14 August 2012 . . PKT (talk | contribs ) (677 bytes)
(diff) 12:26, 14 August 2012 . . Brookie (talk | contribs ) (374 bytes) (→‎Article by the subject: new section)
    • Here is last version before afd delete (I demoted the headings)

    Article by the subject

    A feeling in my water says that this was penned by the subject - no evidence - just a hunch. Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 12:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Substantiated by reading the article's history. PKT(alk) 12:40, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    The subject is now openly editing the article. Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 08:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    The article was created by a colleague at our museum and subsequently expanded by myself. We are also going to add further scientists, who fulfill the relevance criteria, from our institution and other German paleontological and biological research institutions, because we noted a striking absence of German living scientists in our field of activity, compared to those of other countries (e.g. Michael S. Engel, David Grimaldi, Alexandr Pavlovich Rasnitsyn). I know that Wikipedia:Autobiography discourages (but does not prohibit) editing pages about oneself. As long as the edits are not obviously biased, fulfill the relevance criteria, and are supplied with valid sources, I see no problem with that.--Dr. Günter Bechly (talk) 11:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks - is there an article to be created in your PhD subject odonate phylogeny? I have no idea what it is! Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 13:19, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    "odonate phylogeny" is the evolutionary relationships and fossil history of dragonflies and damselflies (insect order Odonata). There is actually a section on phylogeny in nearly every article on systematic groups of organisms. I am currently adding more content on odonate phylogeny to Wikipedia, e.g. recently the page for the fossil dragonfly family Stenophlebiidae. Next will be a page for Tarsophlebiidae. Greetings--Dr. Günter Bechly (talk) 17:18, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


    Notability?

    With all respects to the subject, are they notable enough to have their own page? By way of comparison, Volker Mosbrugger, the head of the Senckenberg museum, and also a paleontologist, doesn't have his own page. Oharar (talk) 13:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    That seems to be a good point, there aren't many secondary sources that cover Mr. Bechly. Thus may be worth nominating for deletion. For the same reason I have not tried to write an article for the preeminent myrmecologist Gennady Dlussky even though he was one of the for most ant and fossil ant taxonomist of this century.--Kevmin § 15:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Rex Brinkworth

    He is a notable person, founder of the UK Down's Syndrome Association —Paulgwilliams (talk) 10:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Adobe photoshopelements2.jpg

    Image was deleted under F5 due to being removed (partially) by vandalism now fixed on Adobe Photoshop Elements —KylieTastic (talk) 18:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, image restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jay Schwartz

    I, ARouleau, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ARouleau (talk) 20:12, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Done already by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs). ~Anachronist (talk) 17:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Selman Munson & Lerner

    This page was deleted because of a PROD. Nobody at the law firm was notified of the complaint or the deletion. Once the page is restored, we will consider the complaint and make any necessary changes. —74.213.7.194 (talk) 20:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    There is no requirement to notify the firm of anything going on within Wikipedia, because it is not "your" article; you have no claim whatsoever to the article or any of its content. That said, the user who created the article was notified, at User talk:Arielgraves. Your firm also has no business making any substantive changes to the article, because you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
    Because it was deleted in accordance with WP:PROD, it qualifies for restoration by request, so I have restored it. However, the article looks unsuitable for Wikipedia, so I have nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selman Munson & Lerner. You are welcome to make your case, grounded in Wikipedia policy, why the article should be kept. Merely existing is not a valid reason to keep an article about a company. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    DLMA analysis

    New sources for the previously deleted page establishing notability of the business tool http://www.grantthornton.co.uk/insights/the-board-creating-and-protecting-value/ https://www.perivantechnology.co.uk/boards-blog/what-is-the-ideal-mix-of-perspectives-in-your-boardroom —120.21.189.213 (talk) 22:41, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:Agata potato.

    This talk page should be undeleted and moved with no redirect to Talk:Agata potato. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:00, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    virajmishra

    I want my all accounts Delete from Wikipedia, I do not have any interest anymore. Now in Wikipedia, I do not want my name to be in Wikipedia yet. Please delete my all accounts from Wikipedia.Thanks —2405:204:E408:2BF7:EB58:B781:F118:A919 (talk) 11:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done, and wrong venue in any case. Accounts cannot be deleted. If you have no more interest, simply don't log in. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Cliff Chapman

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —The Magic Wanderer (talk) 11:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Cliff Chapman - "unsuccessful actor" is libellous and career damaging. Cliff Chapman works as an actor, represented by Meredith Westwood Management Ltd and London Voiceover, and regularly books work with amongst other employers, The Black Library, part of the Worldwide Brand Games Workshop limited, as a voiceover actor, as well as Big Finish for their Pathfinder Legends audio drama range, again based on an international brand game. Recent commercial clients include Dulux paint for a voiceover to a web ad. An actor is not only successful if they appear in Hollywood movies or top rated TV shows. An actor is successful if he or she continues to earn a living. Cliff Chapman has a valid IMDB, UK Spotlight page, Equity union membership, and many 2017 credits.

    Cliff Chapman also appeared in The Future Boys Trilogy of stage shows and subsequent successful Kickstarter funded audio comedy-dramas. The writer, Steve Jordan has a Wikipedia page. Cliff Chapman is referenced on this. Therefore surely the actor is entitled to a page?

    All CV links available via www.cliff-chapman.com

    Once again, to delete the page with ref: "Unsuccessful actor" is immeasurably career-damaging and NOT correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Magic Wanderer (talk • contribs) 11:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @The Magic Wanderer: The article was deleted with the reason "Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". That is an objective statement of fact. Nowhere does it say "unsuccessful actor." Don't invent claims of libel where none exist.
    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user SouthernNights (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:46, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Queen V (Musician)

    I, Edmartin4, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Edmartin4 (talk) 14:51, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:47, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Liyana de Silva

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    G. Jayantha

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:28, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    D. Kodikara

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    D. de Silva

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    G. Fernando

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:30, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    C. Thusara

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Ajantha (cricketer)

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    C. Sandanayake

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I. Kudigame

    Easily passes WP:CRIN and so was controversial. For more check here. —Greenbörg (talk) 15:32, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Anthony Baratta (designer)

    Greetings,

    Hope all is well. I have been handed your information from a colleague of mine in regards to our company's wikipedia page that I understand has been deleted/taken offline.

    Please assist me with figuring out how we get our page back up and running successfully?

    Greatly appreciate your help and hoping we can expedite this process.

    Please advise how we proceed?

    Thanks again,

    -Tyler — AB Designs (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Not doneWikipedia cannot be used to promote companies or people. In this case the user that created the page was not permitted to edit. Also if people are paid to write a disclosure must be made. If it is not, all that writing must be removed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:31, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Horn The Hunt

    I, 46.208.71.81, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 46.208.71.81 (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The University of Oklahoma Men's Glee Club

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Benhudd96 (talk) 20:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC) Draft:The University of Oklahoma Men's Glee Club[reply]

    Draft:Royal Cruising Club (RCC)

    I, John Langdon, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. John Langdon (talk) 23:26, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Felipe Smith

    This page should not be speedily deleted because this article is not unambiguous promotion and has been written from a neutral point of view; it also provides references and includes specific page numbers of bibliography consulted. This article is about a notable writer/artist who is already mentioned in many wikipedia articles(MBQ,Peepo Choo,Ghost Rider (Robbie Reyes)). --˜˜˜˜ —Kailey.marie.valentine (talk) 07:01, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The speedy was actually removed by a different editor as inapplicable. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I think this was a reaction to a speedy deletion proposal, which was declined. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:16, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Russell Harrison (inventor)

    (talk) 09:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC) I would like this page to please be undeleted. This is because I believe that the mi-pad concept counts as encyclopaedic content. This is a contribution to the construction industry and a revolution in house building. Please follow the link to show proof of the patent https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2523915}} Off site construction is becoming the future.Sw2016 (talk) 09:47, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Clarification needed. @Sw2016: Are you requesting that the article be restored to the main encyclopedia, or are you requesting the history be restored into draft space (i.e., to Draft:Russell Harrison (inventor))? I'm happy to do the latter, since the AfD indicated that the article might be improvable. However, it's clear from the community that an article about Harrison is not warranted at this time. —C.Fred (talk) 14:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    MHISoft eVault

    I want to retrieve the content and rework on it —Tony Xue (talk) 16:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    BlueVine

    I, Golden tamarin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Golden tamarin (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    BlueVine

    The entry is blank and I'd like to create a new, complete entry —Golden tamarin (talk) 18:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=806247762"