Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by License2Kill (talk | contribs) at 22:12, 7 September 2015 (→‎Adonnis: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Draft:Maurice Claypole

This was my first attempt and I was too busy to try to sort out the problem with the referencing which was the only reason for it not being accepted. I would appreciate a second chance to sort this out. Thanks -Celia612 (talk) 17:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wendell Mobley

Page was speedy deleted via G12 as copyright violation; prior versions were not a copyright violation. I know because I wrote the original version myself. Please undelete only the revisions that are not a violation. -Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@TenPoundHammer:  Done - pre-copyvio revisions restored. Ping Jimfbleak for info. JohnCD (talk) 10:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/European Conference on Visual Perception

I, Strasburger, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Strasburger (talk) 23:37, 30 August 2015

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia. JMHamo (talk) 00:44, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Strasburger: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles_for_creation/Sigma_Omega_Phi_Fraternity

because we want to make the corrections and resubmit. -Qpid diamond (talk) 01:30, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Qpid diamond: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Sigma Omega Phi Fraternity. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Saumya.omer/sandbox

I, Saumya.omer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saumya.omer (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It will have to be less like an advertisement to be accepted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:47, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

nainsingh mahar

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nainsinghmahar (talk) 11:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Nainsinghmahar:  Done - I have restored the page, but moved it to the Draft space at Draft:Nainsingh Mahar, as it is not acceptable for the encyclopedia in its present state. More advice on your talk page soon; meanwhile, read WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 14:08, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ORKA

I, 86.188.53.125, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.188.53.125 (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:ORKA. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Judo do summary decisions and not following community discussions

It's a case of pages deleted as a result of summary decisions and not following community discussions The single most glaring piece of misinformation was the claim that Judo do has been an Olympic sport since 1964 It is possible to delete some parts of a page's history, while leaving the current revision of the page intact, so that readers are unaware of the partial deletion (unless they attempt to visit a deleted old page revision) If you think ONLY ONE translated sentence is incorrect!!! French translation = The judo do simultaneously judo entered as a demonstration sport in the Olympic Games program Summer 1964 Tokyo. Check Bibliography =

<long bibliography redacted>

Are all this books about this subject Blatant hoax???--Aikikai45 (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

@Aikikai45:  Not done. If an article starts off with misinformation like that in the first line, nothing in it can be trusted. It is not up to us to comb through the article checking which claims are true and which are not: The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material. I suggest you write a new version at Draft:Judo do, putting in only material that you have verified and can cite to a reliable source. JohnCD (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD: reliable source is on the article !!!--Aikikai45 Draft:Judo do may take a week or more. The Articles for creation process is slightly backlogged. There are 572 submissions waiting for review!!!(talk) 15:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And still seriously problematic.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

summary decisions of RHaworth for (G3: Blatant hoax) but not following community discussions CHECK THE BIBLIBOGRAPHY ABOUT JUDO-DO AND STOP SAYING IT IS JUDO! -Aikikai45 (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Moved up from other section Hasteur (talk) 17:53, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mass killings in capitalist regimes

I'm aware that the decision to upload the article was unpopular among the community, but the article's supporters stand firm behind the argument that if a communist version of the page can exist, then a capitalist version also can. I added the newpage template to most recently deleted one, and spent over an hour fixing the links, quotes, etc. The sources used were reliable. The bias was quickly being removed. The article has the 1st amendment right to exist alongside the communist one. -Socialistguy (talk) 14:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, both "socialistguy" and myself have approached Dennis about the matter. He has stated that he deleted it as a routine matter. I would like to begin the process of supporting its appeal. I do believe that upon fair-minded consideration, the appeal will be granted. Thank you. Youknowwhatimsayin (talk) 16:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Youknowwhatimsayin:. The admin who closed the deletion discussion, user Jayjg (talk) is not currently active, so your appeal should be to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You can start a discussion at Deletion review. If the community decides the article should be recreated then it can be. During the discussion the article can be temporarily restored for people to examine the changes. Chillum 17:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. A discussion has started over at Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Mass_killings_in_capitalist_regimesover there. As a way to facilitate the situation, perhaps someone could archive box the discussion here. Youknowwhatimsayin (talk) 17:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katch 22

I, Mike-eastman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mike-eastman (talk) 15:16, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page cites the actual facts about the London Band Katch 22, formed in 1964 / turned professional in November 1967 -Mike-eastman (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This has been CSD:G13ed twice already and been refunded. Hasteur (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Mike-eastman:  Done to a new location at Draft:Katch 22. Normally, we are reluctant to restore pages which have been restored once and then abandoned again; but in this case I see you did edit the page extensively after the last restoration, just never re-submitted it. The edits seem to have confused the layout considerably, so you will have quite a job to sort it out. Please do that and re-submit as soon as convenient. JohnCD (talk) 16:27, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rocket (film)

Want to improve the article from sources. Google results lots of news sources about this film -Variation 25.2 (talk) 15:57, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Mcmatter, There are reliable sources for the Rocket (film) Search - Variation 25.2 (talk) 16:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Variation 25.2:  Not done the article Rocket (film) was deleted per WP:CSD#G5 as the work of one of a sock-farm of undisclosed paid editors. We are normally reluctant to restore pages like that, so you may have to start from a clean sheet; but you can ask the deleting admin, Smartse if he is willing to restore or userfy the article as a basis for you to work on. JohnCD (talk) 16:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As User:Variation 25.2 is a user in good-standing I don't have a problem with this. I've moved the deleted version to User:Variation_25.2/Rocket_(film). Please ensure it is all sourced and NPOV before moving it back to mainspace. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 16:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco

I, Moonandback, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This submission was declined based on lack of notability. I remain confident that an article on this topic belings in Wikipedia and am continuing to assemble support for its notability. Moonandback (talk) 16:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Moonandback: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


ConsensusDOCS

The ConsensusDOCS page is being completely blocked by a "manager" (not sure exact term), who has been unresponsive. I do not believe it was fairly blocked. He even completely blocked the conversation we had after being unresponsive for over a week. The issue the manager claimed was the webpage was "promotional." I believe he made this determination because the bottom half of the page included the contract catalog, which simply listed the contracts ConsensusDocs publishes. I offered to remove this part, but he did not respond, and ultimately deleted the page. The first half of the page stated facts and history of the company. I don't believe any reasonable person would see this was promotional. I am asking for the page to be reinstated, or at the very least the first half of the page. I appreciate you consideration. Thank you. -17:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)208.185.217.66 (talk)jorhowar

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AJ_Joshi

I, Clintric, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD A7. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This submission was declined based on lack of notability. I remain confident that an article on this topic belings in Wikipedia and am continuing to assemble support for its notability. Clintric (talk) 19:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Clintric:  Not done I have already told you above that, because this was deleted after WP:Articles for deletion/AJ Joshi, it will not be undeleted here. You must ask the closing admin, Joe Decker (talk), and if he does not agree go to WP:Deletion review. Removing the earlier request from this page and asking again will not get you anywhere. JohnCD (talk) 19:19, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emma_Swift, again

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Clintric (talk) 19:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There's a bunch of back and forth between deletion, restoration, and Author request speedy deletion. @Clintric: can you explain why this is? Hasteur (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Clintric:  Not done - suggest you improve Draft:Emma Swift and re-submit it for review. JohnCD (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tui Allen

I, Antonymillen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Antonymillen (talk) 22:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Antonymillen: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Lang (entrepreneur)

I think I did some work on this article before it was deleted in the Orangemoody fiasco, and I'd like to at least see what it was. -Brianhe (talk) 00:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Brianhe:  Not done. He's an Israeli internet entrepreneur who has made a mapping application. His picture may jog your memory. You did some tweaks and copyediting, but the article was basically Orangemoody so I don't want to restore it, at least until I have read all the LTA material. JohnCD (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Keith St John

I, Keith St John, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Keith St John (talk) 06:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith St John: Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise.. Please also read WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 07:57, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

George Oliveira

This page is relevant and informative, the reasons to undelete this page are the same reasons that had created it in the first place, this page was deleted by some user vengeance and negative reputation campaign against its subject.thanks -Olijojo (talk) 10:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Olijojo:  Not done. The article was not deleted for the reasons you suggest, but because it was created by one of a group of scammers who tell subjects that they can create and protect Wikipedia articles in return for money. See WP:Long-term abuse/Orangemoody. JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Karanovic & Nikolic

intend to continue editing -Jennifergrubac1234 (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jennifergrubac1234: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pete Lyon

I, Adelphi14, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adelphi14 (talk) 18:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic temperature controlled coat

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 43.254.111.122 (talk) 18:14, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I presume you are user User:Aravindkumarp1993. I have looked at User:Aravindkumarp1993/Automatic temperature controlled coat, but I am afraid it would be a waste of time to restore it, because it is not suitable for Wikipedia. It describes your own ingenious invention, but an encyclopedia is not a place to announce new things. To understand this, read the Wikipedia:No original research policy, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."
You may get some ideas about where you could publish this at Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. If you would like a copy of the text, I will email it to you on request, if you enable email on your account (at the bottom of the "User profile" tab under "Preferences"). JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Texanol

Please restore the article to my userpage. I'm the author of the german article to Texanol--Kopiersperre (talk) 19:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Complete Restoration Corporate Office, Utah.png

OTRS ticket granted, Please undelete and insert the template, then move to commons and delete: VRTS ticket # 2015071310012538 and {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Thanks. -Willy Weazley 20:58, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, image restored and tagged appropriately. Someone else will have to move to commons. Either way, the file name will remain unchanged so the image can be used in an article regardless of whether it's here or on Commons. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:33, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Boogie Knights (band)

I would like to try to redevelop this page, making sure it meets notability and reliability guidelines. As part of this process, I would like access to the deleted pages' content (it has been deleted twice). I am happy to do the development on Special:Mypage, but undeletion is the only way I know to see the history. -Etoile ✩ (talk) 21:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Etoile:  Done. This was a PROD deletion, so could have been directly restored to the mainspace, but it's in pretty horrible shape, so I have put it at Draft:Boogie Knights (band) where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk)

List of Judo-do techniques

All content is intended to be factual, notable, verifiable with cited external sources, and neutrally presented. -Aikikai45 (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The logs show that it was restored today, moved to draft space, and then deleted again because we already have an article on that topic: Judo do. Please consider expanding that one instead. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Catfish Jim and the soapdish:@WikiDan61: If this is notable enough to be included as a derivative of Judo in the main Judo article, it needs to be notable as a martial art and should be able to stand on its own as a Wikipedia article. My take is that it should be allowed to be tested at AFD.--Aikikai45 (talk) 08:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aikikai45, right now you're facing a possible block from editing because what you're doing right now is extremely disruptive. The article was deleted several times by JohnCD as a hoax. The impression I got was that the article had been deleted because some of the claims were so hyped up in the article that they constituted a hoax. The AfC article was deleted because you requested that it be deleted via WP:G7. Why you requested this is anyone's guess, but I'm assuming that it might have been because you weren't happy that John wasn't allowing a mainspace creation at that point in time. If you want the AfC version restored then that's fine - but it will not be moved back to the mainspace until it passes notability guidelines at AfC. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've blocked them for 48 hours for disruptive editing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tea in the United States

I, Marybethmccabe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marybethmccabe (talk) 23:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:19, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Marybethmccabe. I have deleted the draft as a blatant copyright violation.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

m saif ullah khalid

this page is about real personality "Save page" button below -119.160.69.85 (talk) 10:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please understand that Wikipedia is not a social-networking site for people to write about themselves - see WP:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 21:20, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rishi Bisen

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 49.202.43.214 (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Rishi Bisen is an officer of Indian Revenue Service. He belongs to 2010 i.e. 64th batch if IRS. Mr. Bisen has done Bachelor of Engineering with Metallurgical Engineering branch from Govt. Engineering College Raipur which is now NIT Raipur. Before joining this service he worked in commercial tax and police department in Madhya Pradesh Government for short period. After completing his training from National Academy of Direct Taxes, Nagpur he started his carrier as Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, in MP-CG region.[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I have to say that I do not see any indication that Mr Bisen is notable enough, in Wikipedia's sense, to have an article. Please check out WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Diamantopoulou, Eirini

I, 2A02:582:930:3800:50EF:ABB:AF19:190F, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A02:582:930:3800:50EF:ABB:AF19:190F (talk) 11:13, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk comment: Looks like this IPv6 address created a page over the original contents that were G13d on August 23rd by Sphilbrick. Original creator appears to be Tserginis Hasteur (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Camp Walden

I, Pattwala, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pattwala (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Pattwala: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:59.101.115.147

Criteria for deletion no longer applies. We would like to see the contents. Please restore. -103.6.159.87 (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paging MZMcBride as the deleting admin to help shed light on the issue. Unless something else has happened, "OldIPTalkPage" is still valid and therefore you need to provide more information 103IP. Hasteur (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was nothing useful or interesting there, only a single level-1 vandalism warning from April 2007. JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Who's we? --MZMcBride (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/THE LADAKH TOURS (2)

I, Ladakhii, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ladakhii (talk) 18:12, 2 September 2015 (UTC) It is exist and want to edit -Ladakhii (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Previously requested and denied above. --Finngall talk 19:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia

I moved a wikiproject and created a new one in its place because the previous one was inactive. I acknowledge that I did that incorrectly but now, the project I created in the old project's place was deleted and the old project was moved back. I have hours of code and frmatting invested and I would like that back. So i would appreciate it if you could restore my version and its three subpages (Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Members,Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Contests, Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Awards) and all of their talk pages into User:Tortle/Sandbox 2 so I can retrieve the code and possibly get it ready for a new name. Thanks -Tortle (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend not restoring Tortle's new material until all of the original WikiProject has been restored and associated edits with its temporary renames (from WikiProject Wikipedia to Wikipedia:Defunct WikiProject Wikipedia and then to WikiProject Improving Wikipedia) have been corrected. Tortle's contribution to fixing these edits would be welcome and speed up the process. Liz <font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400"Read! Talk! 23:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will gladly help fix the original wikiproject and revert me edits, in fact, Ill start once I finish writing this but I do not see the benefit on waiting to restore the pages until cleanup of something else is done as that will just get my request buried over here. Thanks Tortle (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All of the reverts are done User:Liz. I would appreciate if you or another admin can review my request. Tortle (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tortle, I'm not sure exactly how to move the old page history, to be honest, since restoring it would just restore it to that specific page. I don't think that there's a way to move specific page histories. I know that RHaworth deleted it and he has more experience with undeletion, so I'm going to tag him and see if he knows how to do it (and can then tell me how to do it as well). I also have to admit that I'm slightly concerned that you're taking on what looks like it'd be a fairly big project, considering that you're a very new user with less than 3,000 edits. This doesn't mean that I won't do it, just more that I'm curious as to why you chose to do something like this as one of your first big projects. Mostly I just kind of want to hear the reason for it and if you have someone helping you with this, preferably someone who is used to creating new WikiProjects. Jusdafax looks like he'd be down for the task, as does several of the people at the WikiProject Council. Making a new WikiProject is a huge, HUGE effort and I'd greatly prefer that you at least have a mentor on call for this. Again, not saying no and the major issue here is just that I'm not sure how to (or if we can) move a deleted edit history or if we just have to cut/paste the content, but I would feel better knowing that you have someone to help you with the overall details. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:03, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was on Wikipedia some years back and I gained a lot of experience back then but honestly have lost some of it. I already set up the wikiproject page and I definetely do plan on getting some good members on board to help things along and give some good suggestions. And anyway, I might wait a while before rebooting it and by then, I would have more expreience. Thanks for responding so quickly and it was nice meeting you Tokyogirl79. Tortle (talk) 07:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tokyogirl79, Im going to be making a lot of changes and starting fresh and mainly need the code. Is there a way for you to view the code and copy and paste it into my sandbox? Or is that not allowed or an issue? Thanks Tortle (talk) 07:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tokyogirl79, I mainly didnt want to add myself into the reviewer section because I wanted a place to explain that I could delete disruptive reviewers from the project but I think I could add myself as a reviewer and say that reviewers can decide to get rid of another with a vote or by consensus. Thanks again, Tortle (talk) 07:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • They are in the WP namespace - we don't need to have long discussions agonising over restoration. I have restored all Tortle's edits in the Wikipedia and Wikipedia_talk namespaces. I view service awards such as {{Looshpah IV Userbox}} and barnstars as out of keeping with the "grown-up" serious state that Wikipedia has now reached but if Tokyogirl or Liz (talk · contribs), who did several if not all their deletions, is willing to restore, then I have no objection. Tortle, try and use "show preview" more - the number of edits seem out of proportion to the actual work being done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have some concerns with that statement Tortle, Wikipedia is not a democracy. Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProject#Inappropriate exclusivity describes why membership statuses and exclusivity are inappropriate. Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProject#Control and organization explains the egalitarian more loosely associated nature of WikiProjects: Coordinators cannot be "forced" on an unwilling WikiProject — there must be consensus amongst its membership that the introduction of a coordination system will benefit the project and coordinators are not arbitrators or "leaders" of a WikiProject — all such decisions are still made by community consensus sum it up pretty well. Starting a WikiProject will not give you special status or "powers" within it, and the project will belong to the community.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 12:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Niku Dutta

I, 117.243.210.26, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.243.210.26 (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vader - Reborn in Chaos

This is a compilation album by Vader, the so called administrator who deleted the page has a history of deleting valid pages. More info on the album, including album artwork http://www.metal-archives.com/albums/Vader/Reborn_in_Chaos/17719 and also on the bands official website here http://www.vader.pl/reborn-e.html Cannot request the administrator to do this because he/she is a troll and has been inactive for years -84.203.56.111 (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is going to be a technical Not done because there's really nothing to restore here. The reason it was deleted was because of no context and looking at the content, I can see why it was deleted as such. It was only a list of tracks and no other information about the album. It didn't even come close to being an article and restoring it would pretty much require someone to instantly write a new article from scratch. It'd be much better for you to create a new article yourself. You can do this by going through AfC (if you don't want to sign up for an account) or signing up with an account (or into an account if you already have one) and creating the page. Just make sure that it would pass notability guidelines per WP:NALBUM, as musical albums are not automatically notable because the band that created them is notable. On a side note, I would really like to ask that you assume good faith about other editors. While I'm not familiar with this now inactive admin, this particular deletion does not give off the impression of any abuse, nor does their talk page show any overwhelming evidence of abuse. It's generally considered to be very poor manners to come in here and write something that can very easily be taken as an WP:ADHOMINEM attack against another person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google X

This page was deleted to make way for an article about an unrelated topic, however, it should be undeleted and should be added a disambiguation tag. (Unsure what exactly) - TheChampionMan1234 01:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC) -- TheChampionMan1234 01:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @TheChampionMan1234: The old article looks like it was deleted at AfD back in 2013, since it closed as a merge to List of Google products#Discontinued products and services. From what I can see, it looks like this is already in the list of discontinued products. There really isn't much to restore and I'm not really certain that we truly need a disambiguation page, to be honest. It looks like we only have two entries with this specific name and the AfD closed with the consensus that while it merited a page somewhere, it didn't really warrant its own entry. While he's not an admin, I do want to ping @Mz7: since he did a non-admin close. The page was redirected and this redirect was deleted by @Timrollpickering:, so I'll ping him as well. Again, I just really don't know that this needs a separate entry outside of where it's already mentioned. Maybe a hatnote at the top of the current article at most. Here's the content of the page:

Google X was a project released by Google Labs on March 15, 2005 and rescinded a day later. It consisted of the traditional Google search bar, but it was made to look like the Dock user interface feature of Apple's Mac OS X operating system.[1] Google did not release any official statement as to why the project was shut down. Although Google X has been taken down, several mirrors still exist. [2]

That's pretty much about it and given that this went through AfD (and there's really not enough to justify a disambiguation page), I'd prefer that we have the OK from the person who closed the AfD. He's not an admin, but I do trust his opinion enough to want his OK on this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Tokyogirl79, TheChampionMan1234, and Timrollpickering: Thanks for the ping. The consensus at AfD was that the topic was not notable enough for a standalone article, so unless it can be shown that significant new information about the subject has been released or discovered since the AfD closed, that consensus should continue to have merit. As Tokyogirl79 mentions, essentially everything that was contained in the former article has been merged to List of Google products#Discontinued products and services, so creating a standalone article without significant new information would be redundant. I would also agree with Tokyogirl that a disambiguation page is probably unnecessary. There would only be two entries, and Google X (the secret facility) is obviously the primary topic. If disambiguation is absolutely necessary, a hatnote would be preferred.
However, (and this is going to sound like me being a stickler for procedure, but I think it's important), Wikipedia's content licensing requires that all content be attributed to its respective authors. This attribution is usually supplied by the edit history of a page, which lists all the authors' names. When you copy text from one Wikipedia page to another (such as when merging content), certain steps need to be taken—the guideline for this is at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. The bare minimum is a link to the source page in the edit summary at the destination page. But, this only works if the source page's edit history still exists with the names of the authors. When Timrollpickering deleted the redirect at Google X, they also deleted the history of the Google X page, which contained the names of the authors of the merged content. This means that at the moment, the merged content about the discontinued 2005 Google X project at List of Google products is technically a copyright violation.
I think the easiest solution is to undelete the former page as a redirect at Google X (discontinued project) or Google X (project), so that the page history (and the attribution) is preserved. Mz7 (talk) 19:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:SwimSafe

I, BelAThompson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BelAThompson (talk) 02:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gender and Sustainability

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Karin Steen (talk) 08:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Braselton

Article was work in progress, Yet to cite sources and was deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by RouterWhisper (talk • contribs) 10:56, 3 September 2015‎

@RouterWhisper: Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for people to write "jokey" articles about themselves and their friends. Read the policy on WP:Biographies of living persons. JohnCD (talk) 11:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aimée Cornwell

I, Julesgreg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I was only just notified today that it was considered for deletion and went back to it to edit it again. But it had gone. -Julesgreg (talk) 11:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Julesgreg: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD: Draft was deleted per G13 by @Mackensen: an hour later. --Finngall talk 03:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD and Finngall: I wasn't aware of this discussion and the speedy tag wasn't removed when the article was restored. I've restored it and removed the tag. Mackensen (talk) 04:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that - I should be able to do these restorations correctly in my sleep by now, but perhaps I was just doing it in my sleep... JohnCD (talk) 08:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Program for Research In Mathematics, Engineering and Science (PRIMES)

I, Dodecahedronic, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dodecahedronic (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dodecahedronic: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:The Program for Research In Mathematics, Engineering and Science (PRIMES). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ahsan Ali Taj

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mohsin Ali Taj (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Matinbox: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
However, Matinbox. I have also deleted the entry for this topic you created in the article mainspace, after you made the above request. I deleted it under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion as it was blatantly promotional – something that the undeleted draft also suffers from. Please remove all the puffery, peacock language, statements of opinion about his virtue and so on, and include only facts that reliable sources can back up (without copying their words).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hunt Monitor

<long article text removed> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zinfandelorganic (talk • contribs) 07:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zinfandelorganic:  Not done This is not the place to post the text of your article. It was deleted because its original author was identified as one of a group of paid editors/scammers creating, and pretending to be able to protect, articles for money. You should consult the deleting administrator, Timotheus Canens (talk). JohnCD (talk) 08:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the original page is still at Draft:Hunt Monitors. You are welcome to add your improvements to that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr Mohd Fouzuddin

I, Shaandon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shaandon (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:European Language Equality Network (2)

I, Branwalather99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Branwalather99 (talk) 12:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Branwalather99: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia..
Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, called Wikipedia:Notability, looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", i.e. not just press releases or the project's own material. The test is whether people not connected with it have found it sufficiently interesting or important to write substantial content about it. JohnCD (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Melmer

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -192.152.249.253 (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC) I am asking that this particular page be accepted into Wikipedia. Thanks for your consideration.[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Melmer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mkdw (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan Price photo.png

OTRS received. Please undelete. -Willy Weazley 23:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

uranipuram

This article is about an uranipuram village and it will help the people to know about the village -Anish hs (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you're asking for the U5-speedied revisions to be restored? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ogik Francis Peter

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ogik Francis Peter (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (NeilN (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a resume hosting service; I will note that you have been warned for repeatedly posting it here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buymore Limited

I, Smartjon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smartjon (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was declined and later deleted since it lacked citation and references, back then. I am happy to announce now there are multiple notable sources on the subject and hence I request permission to be allowed to proceed to edit and resubmit for clearance -Smartjon (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Smartjon, this is a technical Not done since the article contained content that was fairly promotional in tone, although I am willing to e-mail you a copy of the article. You'd have to take these portions out in order to make it neutral. An example is the phrase "Buymore is at the heart of the social media users and thus it strives to maintain a rapport and communicate events as they unfold directly to its customers via its twitter (@BuymoreCard) and Facebook (BuymoreKenya) platforms." Also, are you involved with the company in any form or fashion? I ask this because normally articles that sound promotional like this are promotional because they're written by someone involved with marketing, the article topic, or were otherwise asked/paid to create the article. You can still edit if this is the case, but you will need to disclose this COI on your userpage by stating that you are a paid editor (or whatever the COI is) and (if you are making non-paid edits along with paid edits) the titles of the articles you were asked to create. You can read more about this at WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another note: try to only include one official website in the external links section. You had nine links, which comes across as WP:ELSPAM. Typically you should only have the primary official website in the EL section since the official website should have links to their social media accounts - Wikipedia should not be used as a hub for these sites, nor should it contain the social media links for people involved with the company. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Barwal Rajput

I, 2.223.168.64, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2.223.168.64 (talk) 21:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Advances in Group Theory and Applications

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Francesco de Giovanni (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Advances in Group Theory and Applications" is a new journal, but its editorial board, which is listed in the journal web page is formed by 13 very well-known mathematicians from several different countries, considered as the best world expert on the field. Their quality can for instance be checked either using the MathSciNet data base of the American Mathematical Society or the Mathematics Genealogy Project. It is reasonable that in the next few years the journal will have a prominent role in the mathematical world. The theory of groups is one of the most relevant topic of algebra (its foundation being due to Evariste Galois in 1831) Thanks for your consideration, Francesco de Giovanni (2006 Honorary degree as Doctor of Science from the National University of Ireland)

  • Not done This article is currently up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advances in Group Theory and Applications, so it does not fall under REFUND criteria. If it is deleted then you will have to petition the deleting administrator for the article's return and if they decline, go through WP:REFUND. However that said, right now the best time to try to save the article is in the here and now, so you need to argue for inclusion at the AfD discussion. I'll warn you: it's extremely difficult to argue for inclusion for journals since most times new journals will not gain coverage in RS nor will they tend to be included in notable indexing services unless they're through an extremely reputable organization or company. (IE, places that likely already have notability themselves and are already well established.) I note that this is an open access journal, which usually makes it even more difficult to establish notability, especially if it's newly founded. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chieftec

This article was PRODed with my alternative account when I was still a WP:Newbie and did not understand notability guidelines. The topic passes WP:GNG. -sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 03:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Axial Flow Combines

I, Jamesbushell.au, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jamesbushell.au (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TOM EARLEY

I, 86.153.147.6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.153.147.6 (talk) 06:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Team Secret

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Edwin Hale (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

I am a technological cretin and not very competent at constructing new pages. Nonetheless, I have contributed over many years, both whole articles and regular corrections.

I do not play computer games but my attention was drawn to a particularly successful team led by Clement "Puppey" Ivanov which has succeeded in winning over $1.5 million in prize money over the past 18 months. I believe that wikipedia needs to show references to such teams as to any teams or competitors in major sports, written in laymen's terms.

I realise that my original entry was short of references but give me time! I am a busy man and the entry was deleted too soon for me to draw in the necessary additional information and references, some, but not all of which can be found on other wikis.

International Project Management Association

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Qianbang (talk) 10:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

we updated IPMA´s Wikipedia presence and some guys (?) from North-America want to delete the site.

IPMA is an international professional Association with more than 60 contries Memeber associations. All us need to keep this and we will edit it often

  • Not done Qianbang, This is currently at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Project Management Association. If this is deleted at AfD this will not be something that could be restored through REFUND. Also, you will need to show that the organization is notable by showing where it has received coverage in independent and reliable sources such as news articles or similar. Just existing as an organization, even an international one, is not something that would show notability in and of itself. Also, please be aware that anyone can edit Wikipedia and while your comments do not explicitly show that you are trying to exert WP:OWNERSHIP of the page, it does somewhat give off that impression. In general Wikipedia discourages people from editing articles that they have a direct conflict of interest with, as it's very, very easy for people to make promotional sounding edits or take deletion or changes a bit too personally. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nithya Menen Malli malli idi rani roju making.jpeg

Please undelete then move to commons. -Willy Weazley 14:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Willy Weazley: See my note on the OTRS ticket. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:QualiTest Logo.jpg

Please undelete. Thanks. -Willy Weazley 14:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, restored and tagged. Please double-check my tagging. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stephen Watson Speaking at a BMW Event in 2012.jpg

Please undlete. OTRS received. -Willy Weazley 14:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, restored and tagged. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Railways E-Procurment Systems (IREPS)

I wanted to review and will make changes as per its existing condition. I am working for IREPS and wanted its presence online and wiki is the best place people look after, it a very popular website in Indian Railways -223.176.239.88 (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We have zero tolerance for being used for SEO/advertising. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless, @Jéské Couriano: WP:AFC is the appropriate venue for an editor with a conflict of interest to submit an article. That said, I'd feel better about restoring it if the request came from a registered user account that clearly disclosed its paid-editing affiliation. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Amatulic: I intend it more as a warning not to view Wikipedia as a place to advertise, given what the requestor said indicates he only cares about Wikipedia because of its Alexa ranking. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nasher%27s_Stool_At_The_Bell_Inn&action=edit&redlink=1

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 151.229.171.147 (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Medisaid/"The fifth dimension equation"

I, Medisaid, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to undelete my article because I want to take some lost informations from it. Also, after two times my articles was delete, i would appreciate if you can tell me precisely whats wrong about it. I dont want to make advertising, i juste want to put my work in a link. Tell me how to do it please. Dear regards. -Medisaid (talk) 16:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Medisaid:  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request, so you can recover information from it; but I am afraid that there is no chance this will be accepted for the encyclopedia. The reason is that it is your own original work, but Wikipedia is not a place to publish original work. Please read Wikipedia:No original research, which includes:

"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery. "

JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bwin.svg

I am restoring the Bwin article as an article on the historical company. The logo is necessary for the infobox. -Cloudbound (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cloudbound:  Done. Please add it to the article a.s.a.p. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, already done. Cloudbound (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mary Bettwy

I, 68.8.121.146, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.8.121.146 (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am still in the process of retrieving additional primary sources to establish that Mary Bettwy was a well-known public figure in Arizona; females were not as well documented at the time -68.8.121.146 (talk) 00:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 1.187.128.52 (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forum on Information Standards in Heritage

I, 31.222.211.51, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 31.222.211.51 (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atreides_(album)

The administration deleted it hastily in less than 24hrs of the notice so I was not able to challenge it. After reviewing the case, he/she asked me to request this undeletion. -Discog79 (talk) 10:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:AstroCourthouseFacilityDog.jpg

Boilerplate release received 2015-07-28. Please restore with {{cc-by-sa-3.0|attribution=David Walsen}}{{GFDL|migration=redundant}} if plausible (no reason for me to suspect otherwise). Thanks! -Storkk (talk) 13:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

trifid(Research)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rajnishtrifid (talk) 15:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your company. JohnCD (talk) 15:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

chandra jyoti chakma

I don't know how to delated my artcle - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandra jyoti chakma (talk • contribs) 17:01, 7 September 2015

@Chandra jyoti chakma:  Not done. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself. Please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. JohnCD (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KONI Group

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Regushee (talk) 21:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Also pinging NawlinWiki and Human3015 who also felt the same way. Hasteur (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adonnis

Adonnis

I, License2Kill, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. License2Kill (talk) 22:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=679965421"