Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Captainzarmani (talk | contribs) at 15:14, 16 November 2017 (→‎Please userfy Draft:Wakanow to me. Thanks.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases

    Knifehandchop

    Requesting userfication. I have identified additional reliable sources that substantiate this musician's notability - sources the AfD missed. I'd like to see if there's anything salvageable from the page history which I can build from. —Chubbles (talk) 22:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Nakon: Any objection? ~Anachronist (talk) 22:27, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Nakon hasn't been super active over the past two months. Chubbles (talk) 09:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Kenneth Cousineau

    I, Radazex, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Radazex (talk) 04:15, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Solitaire-by-Kelley-Eskridge-pub-Small-Beer-Press-cover-by-Frances-Lassor.gif

    I would like to complete the licensing details, as the page was deleted because of F4: Lack of licensing information —Juniperpaul (talk) 05:55, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Landfill Harmonic

    I, Mathew5000, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mathew5000 (talk) 07:13, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • The draft was never approved but a separate article on this subject was created in March 2017: Landfill Harmonic. I know that the draft had some sourced facts that are not in the present article; I would therefore like the draft restored so that I can move anything useful into the new article. Mathew5000 (talk) 07:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Roger Salmon (banker)

    I missed the PROD, so I did not have to opportunity to furnish the article with the reliable sources that the article apparently did not have. Roger Salmon's notability should not be in question: he was the architect of Britain's most controversial privatisation. —— Charles Stewart (talk) 08:42, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I'd be happy to fix this article either in the main space, my user space, or as a draft. — Charles Stewart (talk) 08:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Mayorkun

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Eyitayo osunkoya (talk) 18:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Artiste is doing quite well both locally and internationally now.

    Thank you.

    @Eyitayo osunkoya: Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayorkun, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Paul Ling Tai

    I, KleeHSUSA, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KleeHSUSA (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ScitDei/Assisi Convent School (noida)

    I, ScitDei, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ~ ScitDeiWanna talk? 03:55, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Zafar Shah

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —131.227.54.198 (talk) 04:35, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Liliana Martins

    I'm gonna update the content of the page and properly translate it to english —Ndavid74 (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    burghrecords

    copyright infringement is incorrect "Save page" button below —Sonnyf (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    It was deleted multiple times. Copyright infringement was one of the earlier reasons. This is not a proper main space article. I'm willing to restore it to draft space for you to improve if you agree to submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation and abide by the outcome. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Barong Family

    page was soft deleted instead of redirected to Yellow Claw (DJs) Jax 0677 (talk) 16:58, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    no Declined. The Bushranger (talk · contribs) closed the AFD with the condition "if the proposed guideline passes, and if the label passes GNG and MUSICLABEL(?), it can be WP:REFUNDed." I cannot see that this has happened. Nothing prevents you from creating a redirect. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Anachronist:, may I please have the article moved to my user space? Thank you very much for your attention to these matters. Please {{ping}} me when you respond. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jax 0677:  Done. I have userfied the article to User:Jax 0677/Barong Family. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    List of Criterion Collection UK releases

    This was extremely useful information for UK based film buffs. As the UK is the only additional country to have Criterion releases it needs its own page. This deletion was senseless. —90.210.21.152 (talk) 03:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Criterion Collection UK releases (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Flicker 0056

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jesecaamouni (talk) 08:31, 11 November 2017 (UTC) Hi sir please unblock me my unblocked reason are hare please check Talk:Article Creator Editor please unblock me Sir thanks you[reply]

    This is about the blocked user User:Flicker 0056, not about an article.
    • When your account is blocked, you may not edit Wikipedia. You may not create new accounts, or edit as an IP.
    • This page is not for requesting the lifting of blocks. You have to log in to the original account and post an unblock request to that talk page, using that account. That is the only kind of edit you are allowed to do when you are blocked. --bonadea contributions talk 09:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    sachi Wickramage

    Previoulsy there was an article by this name which was deleted. However the newly created article contained NEW content and significantly verifyable references. This person is increasingly getting recognition for the work he is doing for the United Nations World Summit Awards which acts as the main body for selecting and promoting worlds' best digital innovations with positive impact on society. Therefore, I would like to kindly request to restore this article and if required help improve this article as well. Thanks —Kris Redmond (talk) 11:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. However, I have restored Draft:Sachi Wickramage, which you created as a verbatim copy of the deleted mainspace article the day after it was deleted. I'm considering deleting it again due to the fact that it seems to have been created in bad faith. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Aurelia (web framework)

    I, Gheoan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gheoan (talk) 14:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Khan Baba

    I Wisal Ahmad,request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G12.Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.Wisalahmad523 (talk) 16:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done and will not be done. There is no such draft article. There was a main space article, but articles deleted in accordance with G11 or G12 aren't eligible for restoration by request here. Articles deleted via AFD, as this one was, are also ineligible. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Hershel L. Herzog

    I, Handspringgirl97, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Handspringgirl97 (talk) 18:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:12, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Radartutorial

    There are several unique selling propositions of this web-page:

    • It is the oldest page about radar basics. It is online since 1998 - almost 20 years. 20 years ago, publications on the Internet about radar were often referred to as secret betrayals.
    • It is the largest page about radar basics and radar technologies: the offered for download ZIP-archive contains more than 12.000 files
    • It is a page that makes young students in poor countries independent of expensive literature. Through the download offer, these people are also independent of fluctuations in the supply of the Internet worldwide.
    • It is available in a number of languages.
    • In the appendix is a library about radars, which is the largest in the world (yes, it's even bigger than the one in Wikipedia).

    Yes, this site is an active competition for the Wikipedia. But it is used at many articles and files in Wikipedia to as reference. The site is also quoted in a large number of books (https://www.google.com/search?tbm=bks&q=www.radartutorial.eu). That's the advantage of this page over Wikipedia: it is quotable.

    Of course, a mention in Wikipedia will be a support of this site. But this support would have earned this page as well. —c.w. (talk) 20:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user GraemeL (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
    You don't seem to understand that Wikipedia isn't a publicity medium. To merit an article here, it needs to meet the criteria described in Wikipedia:Notability (web). ~Anachronist (talk) 23:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Þráinn Hjálmarsson

    This article has been deleted where it was claimed that the composer involved did not fullfill WP:COMPOSER. The article though mentions that the composer is credited for a notable composition, nominated for an award. Micitm (talk) 15:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC) —Micitm (talk) 14:37, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Creating Draft:Analyse SI

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) ComputingFroggy (talk) 17:33, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    James Rube Garrett Jr

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —98.162.182.75 (talk) 01:07, 13 November 2017 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Rube_Garrett_Jr.[reply]

    I have no idea why this page was deleted. When I try to post the URL it comes up as : Wikipedia does not have an article with this exact name. Please search for James Rube Garrett Jr in Wikipedia to check for alternative titles or spellings. Log in or create an account to start the James Rube Garrett Jr article, alternatively use the Article Wizard, or add a request for it. Search for "James Rube Garrett Jr" in existing articles. Look for pages within Wikipedia that link to this title. Other reasons this message may be displayed: If a page was recently created here, it may not be visible yet because of a delay in updating the database; wait a few minutes or try the purge function. Titles on Wikipedia are case sensitive except for the first character; please check alternative capitalizations and consider adding a redirect here to the correct title. If the page has been deleted, check the deletion log, and see Why was the page I created deleted?.


    Please Help. Nancy Garrett Brown

    It fails to show up because you're omitting the trailing full stop at the end. The page still exists; see above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:31, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Start.me

    I, Michieldewit, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Michieldewit (talk) 12:36, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Bryan Charnley

    I do not want to insert the disputed image "Bryan Charnley Self Portrait 13" With no image there can be no copyright violation. MORE IMPORTANTLY. Please restore all the deleted text. There was no copyright issue with this and I do not know why it has been removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Charnley (talkcontribs) 16:14, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    •  Not done the revision deleted text/history was a copyright infringement. You can discuss with the hider User talk:TonyBallioni, or discuss it on the talk page of the article. Any inclusions must be in your own words. If you do own the copyright to text on another website, then you can prove it by putting a notice on that web site. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Dion Quamina

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Crisq1988 (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Rabiul_Alam_Biplob

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —202.5.56.79 (talk) 01:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabiul Alam Biplob, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    2017 VCU Rams men's soccer team

    Per previous discussion, individuals believed that college soccer season articles meet WP:NSEASONS if the team either is a prestigious program, or qualifies for the NCAA Division I Soccer Tournament that specific season. During the 2017 season, VCU not only qualified but was one of 16 teams in the nation to earn a seed in the tournament, thus meeting the discussion for what qualifies at WP:GNG and WP:NSEASONS. —Quidster4040 (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1978 VCU Rams men's soccer team, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Note that the closer dismissed your argument, so you will have to try WP:DRV if you think there's a chance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:51, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Never mind, it looks like per this discussion, situation is resolved. Thanks Quidster4040 (talk) 20:33, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Mehar dhakad

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Mehar Dhakad 06:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC) This Is Mehar Dhakad, and i am properly work on my page that you deleted from wikipedia. My project deleted by your side i request to you that please undelete of page. I right article uploaded from my page. Thankyou — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehar dhakad (talkcontribs) 06:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Calla Property

    {{subst:refund|1= Page Shahzain.charania |2= Accidental — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahzain.charania (talkcontribs) 06:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done There is no page with that name. You will not be allowed to rename your user to "Calla Property" as that sounds as if it is an organisation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Khumariyaan

    I want to restore this article b/c it fulfill the criteria of Wikipedia:GNG either directly or by Draft —Wisalahmad523 (talk) 07:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • The entire content said "Khumariyaan is a Pakistani pashto music band, whis is consisted on different types of musicians of typical pashto music organs." written by Usman gondalsahab . It is not worth restoring, and you may as well rewrite it from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:59, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:John Shahidi.jpg

    OTRS permission received —Krd 18:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Shahzain.charania

    Accidentally deleted, was trying to create another page. New to Wikipedia —Shahzain.charania (talk) 00:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Cat Alter

    2605:E000:1313:438:0:184D:3BF1:C71 (talk) 03:07, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Tina Byles Williams

    I, Murray Owen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Murray Owen (talk) 03:23, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Reda Athanasios

    I'm not sure how the page was G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. All of the contents were true statements about Reda. I've known him for over 20 years. What needs to be done to keep it from deletion? —Lkpeenut (talk) 03:56, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    It was probably due to the Career section, in which we are treated to such unsubstantiated puffery as "passionate about influencing the world positively by applying technology to improve the quality of education for all" and "immersed in the rapid growth" and "recognized Online Education pioneer". In cases like this, you need to ask the deleting admin, Jimfbleak (talk · contribs), to consider restoring it, or at least restoring it to draft space for improvement. Failing that, you can open a case at Wikipedia:Deletion review to contest the validity of deletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Moncton Rugby Football Club

    I, ChugBug44, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChugBug44 13:47, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

    Draft:Dr. Amin Mekki Medani

    (no text provided) Informationmaster14 (talk) 13:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bradley W. Hart

    I, Climate2000, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Climate2000 (talk) 16:16, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Page was on construction. Delete reason: not notability, but page was not finished, this was the first day when I work with wiki. Second reason:Your page is the same as page: https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanism NOT !!! Our page was about "Satanic Religion" created in Moldova, not about Categories of Satanism. We are created in 2012 and we are different from "Church of Satan" by A.Lavey. Soon we will try to register our religion at the Minster of Justice in Moldova. We are only 320 members, but we never yet maked a promotion for have more members. Please undelete our page. —Lisnic (talk) 20:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done and will not be done This is the English Wikipedia, not the Romanian one. You will need to address this on the Romanian Wikipedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Joel Berke deleted

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —AlexanderLeague (talk) 23:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC) Hello, I saw that my page on writer filmmaker was deleted last month for being not notable? Mr. Berke has several film and television credits on the Internet Movie Database so I am confused as to what makes him "not notable."[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
    ...and nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Berke. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:15, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Andrea Sanke

    Sanke is a notable journalist and television presenter, I have a number of reliable sources and would like to rework whatever article existed back in 2006 when it was deleted. The deleting admin has been inactive since 2011, so I cannot ask them. If you could, please userfy it (move undeleted article to my userspace) so I can work on it. Thank you. —GigglesnortHotel (talk) 15:02, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Please userfy Draft:Wakanow to me. Thanks.

    Draft:Wakanow

    I, Captainzarmani, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Captainzarmani (talk) 15:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]