Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 84.189.207.1 (talk) at 17:42, 1 April 2018 (→‎Draft:RootsTrust: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts
    "WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion

    Massacre of Brzostowica Mała

    First, my vote count suggest 'no consensus' rather than preference delete (merge 1, Delete 6, Keep 7). Second, deleting admin (User:Sandstein) noted problems with verifiability, which puzzles me. He notes the lack of English language sources, but so what? WP:NOENG and such - an experienced editor such as him should know well no English language sources are necessary for a topic to be notable (and verifiable). His opinion that " controversial issues in WP:AC/DS topic areas do require good sources in more than one (non-English) language in order to allow as many editors as possible, and not just a few or those possibly associated with one side of a conflict, to assess the content" is totally novel and goes against NOENG spirit. We DO NOT need English language sources to estabilish notability or reliability, scholarship in Foo language is totally fine. Finally, he mentions issues with neutrality and the controversy about perpetrators ethnicity. Neutrality is never a factor in AfD when it comes to deciding whether a topic can be deleted or not, we have {{NPOV}} that suffices for content disputes. Further, as I stated on the talk page of the article where we had a relevant discussion (now deleted...), yes, there are no good sources for this controversial description of the massacre perpetrators ethnicity (regardless of language, when I reviewed this article yesterday or so I couldn't find a single source in any language for that claim, as I noted on the talk). I expected within the few days at most we would remove relevant adjectives from the article as unsourced, and should address neutrality concerns. A lot of people participating in this AfD voted 'delete' because they DONTLIKE said claims about ethnicity of perpetrators - an invalid deletion rationale, and anyway, irrelevant concern since this claim is likely not going to survive in the article because I don't think it is verifiable. But to delete the article about a notable event just because of controversy over a single claim is IMHO quite improper. To summarize: there was no consensus for delete, and I don't see any valid reasons for deletion of this notable topic, controversy over a single fact (nationality of the perps) is not relevant to the notability of the main topic (massacre did happen, nobody disputes that). —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done @Piotrus: Since you're a regular, I won't answer with a boilerplate template reply, but I must ask, why are you posting here? Did you not see the blue box at the top? We don't restore AFD-deleted articles by request on this page; this is for restoring non-controversial deletions. You need to contact the deleting admin and state your case to him, and if you are not satisfied with the response, take it to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:45, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Anachronist: Thanks. I've done so but it seems DR will not result in a restore (Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Massacre_of_Brzostowica_Mała). In that case, in line with Wikipedia:Userfication ("For help getting a copy of a deleted article, to put into your userspace, see Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles, or post at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion), I'd like to ask for this to be userfied in my userspace, since as at least one other editor suggested in the AfD, parts of this may be eligible for merging to Skidel revolt. At the very least, it will save me time to re-code / reformat some references. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:33, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Piotrus: Please send me a reminder when the DRV closes and if it remains deleted I'll userfy it for the purpose of merging parts of it elsewhere. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:EverythingEpan User/Userbox

    Because in my userbox user page even so ugly arranged. So to make it again. —EverythingEpan (talk) 00:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File://

    Redirect —95.187.159.183 (talk) 12:43, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    To where? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    File URI scheme --95.187.159.183 (talk) 09:07, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    G13Reef Revolution

    G13Reef Revolution · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

    User:Hargs775/sandbox

    I, Hargs775, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hargs775 (talk) 10:20, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    The Royal School of Dunkeld

    I, FKRitchie, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FKRitchie (talk) 10:36, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    I simply did not get around to submitting the few required edits to make the page worthy of publication. I would still like to do this. Thank you. click the "Publish changes" button below —FKRitchie (talk) 10:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Zibby Allen

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mallen22 (talk) 15:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Duke Jazz Ensemble

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Klitz1 (talk) 21:58, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Duke Jazz Ensemble

    WVTV (Villanova)

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2601:8B:4400:8A31:907A:E6B7:8709:C1C7 (talk) 02:20, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    This deleted page is for Villanova University’s only television station which operates both within the campus and on a national level online. The deletion of this page should be reversed.

    Chris Nichols

    I originally posted this request at the deleting admin's talk page, but noticed he is no longer an administrator as of January, so cannot help me. I believe the original deletion was probably appropriate, so DRV wouldn't be the right venue, either. Back in 2013, Chris Nichols was deleted at AfD. Assuming this 2013 article was about the columnist/author, I have several reliable third-party sources about him including a feature in Pasadena Weekly [1] and write ups/reviews of his book [2], [3], which won a 2008 Independent Publishers award [4]. I'd like to try and rescue this, would someone mind userfying it for me so I can work on it? —The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 02:57, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Sounds like a different person, one instantiation was about a Virginian shooter, and the other was a student at Marquette University. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:36, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, that does sound like a totally different person. This can be closed. Thank you! The Master ---)Vote Saxon(--- 22:43, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Bella Alubo

    Mabel Oine Alubo (born 9 August 1993), professionally known as Bella Alubo, is a Nigerian musician born and raised in Jos, Plateau state, but is originally from Idoma, Benue state. —Mabel Alubo (talk) 12:39, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    As you stated in your earlier edit I’m a Nigerian artiste signed to Tinny Entertainment Africa. I’m trying to restore a wiki page of me that was created or create a new one so I can come up in google searches. your purpose seems to be blatant selfpromo! In general, when a person is notable someone else will write an article about that person. The Banner talk 13:05, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
     Not done. @Mabel Alubo: You need to meet at least one of the inclusion criteria in WP:MUSICBIO and you don't, according to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bella Alubo. Also, see the blue box at the top of this page, we don't restore articles that were deleted as an outcome of a deletion discussion like that. If you want to create an article about yourself, you need to do it in your sandbox or draft space, and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Enzo Zacchiroli

    I, Drdjoneswiki, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Drdjoneswiki (talk) 13:23, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Drdjoneswiki: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:24, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    isabelle donola

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mode40 (talk) 14:12, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. @Mode40: There is no article by that name or variations using uppercase characters in the deleted contribution history, either in main space, draft space, AFC space, or in your own deleted contributions. Please verify the title. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:08, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Prix Maurice Ballot

    Dear Randykitty, In response to your deletion of the new page Prix Maurice Ballot given by the French Astronomical Society, I would like to better understand your position relative to similar long-established content on Wikipedia.

    The wiki page for the American Astronomical Society -- which is a peer of the French Astronomical Society-- lists 20 of its awards, virtually all of which have their own dedicated pages on wiki. Many of those are minor awards, for example the Chambliss Amateur Achievement Award (page created 2007), which is given "for an achievement in astronomical research made by an amateur astronomer resident in North America." This is virtually identical to the objective of the Prix Maurice Ballot which is "recognition of authors of works of the Society's observatory" (i.e. amateur or professional).

    Similarly, the wiki page for the Astronomical Society of the Pacific -- another peer of the French society -- has a page for their "Amateur Achievement Award of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific" (page created 2006), which is given for "significant contributions to astronomy or amateur astronomy by those not employed in the field of astronomy in a professional capacity." Again, virtually identical to the French society's prize.

    The type of organisations, the nature of the three awards, the "noteworthiness", and the level of references provided on all three wiki page are virtually identical, yet the French award was deleted and the others remain. There are many other such wiki pages for awards offered by other astronomical organisations outside of France, which I would be pleased to share with you. Please note that besides the award winners themselves, it is mostly the sponsoring astronomical organisations that document/write about their own awards.

    In the above context, I respectfully request you to reconsider the deletion of the Prix Maurice Ballot page. Thanks for your consideration of this request —Akrokerama (talk) 11:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for informing me of this status. The page is in limbo since the editor simply replaced my draft with a redirect code (a de facto deletion without explanation other than un-noteworthiness which I have addressed above). Please guide me as to how I can resolve this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akrokerama (talk • contribs) 21:14, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    You can undo the change to a redirect. You can discuss this with the person who did it. You could open a discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Awards (since I do not think the talk page of the redirect will get much attention). If you do undo the change, please gather more independent references that show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jon Green

    Still in progress of completing the page, more work needs to be done on it —Harrywood2 (talk) 12:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Paul Woolston

    I, WearDownSouth, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WearDownSouth (talk) 12:51, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    254 (number)

    Article was deleted for unimportance, and has since been restored. Might as well restore the previous edit history for article improvement. —— Arthur Rubin (talk) 12:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Arthur Rubin:  Done, history restored. There appear to be some sources cited in the old versions, whereas the current version is completely unreferenced. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Barbara Pořízková

    I, Zuzi.vik, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. zuzi.vik (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Photonics Media

    I, 24.213.236.210, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.213.236.210 (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    BlackBerry Soul Radio

    Updating the page's information. Did not recognize email which warned of deletion until now —Quadeershakur (talk) 18:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Loch Tay Boat Song

    I want to read this article and find more about this song and its origins as an important folk song. If it existed in the past and I want to read it now, then at least two people found it important enough to want to read an entry about it.

    Specifically, I am interested in learning about when this song came into existence and what some of the slang means. —Whyhelloclarice (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Won't do you much good. The entire contents of the article are the words to the song, which can be found easily enough by searching for "Loch Tay Boat Song lyrics". If you're curious about the phrase "nighean ruadh", it means "red-haired little girl" according to one source. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 19:39, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Janet Boyman

    Deletion "edit conflicted" with my removal of the speedy tag. This is good content, available under an irrevocable open licence, and was only speedy deleted because of this dispute. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC) —Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:37, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:Jay Hunter

    This should be moved back to Draft talk:Jay Hunter after undeletion as Jay Hunter was moved back to Draft:Jay Hunter. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:26, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    John North (Christian author and speaker)

    John North is the author of numerous books and resources, speaks at many conferences in Australia and elsewhere, has a regular morning radio spot on Hope 103.2FM in Sydney, and is the National Director of Ambassadors for Christ International Australia. His wikipedia page is used by people to find out about him prior to hearing him speak or buying a book. A quick search of the http://hope1032.com.au radio station website, plus the afci.com.au website and a google search of EvangelismSHIFT will show that these things are so. Please restore my page on John North —Life can have ultimate meaning 07:45, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

    ... and sent to AfD. Hut 8.5 09:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Churchill Retirement Living

    I hadn't worked on the draft article for 6 months so it was deleted. I'm now ready to amend it and resubmit for consideration —Miniwik (talk) 12:52, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Miniwik: Restored, but.... This is the second time we've been requested to restore it. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but few edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission (which was declined). Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. Please get the article into shape so that it is accepted, or let it go and it will be deleted again in six months... and likely won't be restored a third time. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Rogerio Breda (Tattoo Artist)

    Articles complete with places,references,links external...."Publish changes" button below —Bibibreda (talk) 15:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. I've removed the stickyprod as inappropriate; that being said the article is a curriculum vitae and should be rewritten, and soon, or it will likely go to AfD. We are an encyclopaedia, not a listing. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:35, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Page has since been moved to Draft:Rogerio Breda (Tattoo Artist). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Rhyners Record Shop

    I will like to contest this deletion notice I got for that article because I created that page and can you please add secondary sources to that article on wikipedia to improve the article of Rhyners Record Shop which is a music store located in Trfinidad and Tobago on Wikipedia.I apoligised for the inconvience caused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki10 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Be aware that it will very likely be sent to WP:Articles for deletion or moved to draft space if the PROD is contested; it's not ready for article space yet. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:31, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Opulence

    Looks like the deletor of this page went away for a bit, so bringing it here for hopefully a quick resolution. The article at this page was deleted in error; please restore. See the linked RfD discussion in the deletion log for further information. —Steel1943 (talk) 19:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, already restored by The Blade of the Northern Lights. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Billykulpa

    I am the user and would like to contribute to the Wikipedia community again. It's literally my name, so, I don't particularly want someone else to use it. —12.156.227.81 (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Nobody else will. Usernames on Wikipedia do not lapse (mainly because usernames, for legal and technical purposes, can't be deleted); just log in under your account info. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Do you want your userpage back? It only has one line of disclosure text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Power Pros

    The series (also known as Jikkyou) was a notable series released in Japan. There are several english articles that exist for the game, such as the ones published by IGN, as seen here. There are also several articles found in the Japanese Wikipedia Page such as this article, which discusses the series' anniversary. —Yoshiman6464 ♫🥚 03:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Joan Sees Stars (film)

    I, Juanitavid, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Juanitavid (talk) 15:12, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:48, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    The Rinaldi Group

    I request to restore/undelete the article The Rinaldi Group. How can an article be deleted on the basis of only a single vote? Deleting the article without proper AFD discussion is very inappropriate. I was about to vote for keeping the article, but before that, the article was deleted. I believe the subject is notable and fulfills the Wikipedia's notability requirement. Also, the reason for nominating the article for deletion was just an opinion, and Wikipedia sees the facts, not an opinion. —Nausad Ahmed 20:52, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. The second AfD discussion was not a single !vote, and we don't use votes, we use arguments. Finally, if the concerns about the sources were just opinion, then the arguments would not have been to delete. We do have minimum standards for sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:53, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Teal Swan

    I, 86.163.144.190, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.163.144.190 (talk) 20:20, 30 March 2018 (UTC) I tried contacting Peridon who was the admin that deleted it but according to his talk page he is inactive. Teal Swan is a notable author who has written The Completion Process : https://www.amazon.com/Completion-Process-Practice-Yourself-Together/dp/1401951449/ and Shadows Before Dawn: https://www.amazon.com/Completion-Process-Practice-Yourself-Together/dp/1401951449/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1522375161&sr=8-1&keywords=teal+swan both of which have substantial reviews on Amazon.com She is ranked 27th on Watkins magazine’s list of the 100 Most Spiritually Influential Living People in 2018: https://www.watkinsmagazine.com/watkins-spiritual-100-list-2018 (published both online and in print)[reply]

    Her notability includes several critics: https://www.ozy.com/provocateurs/spiritual-guru-or-dangerous-cult-leader/81686 https://medium.com/@jtdabbagian/reviewing-the-completion-process-by-teal-swan-why-this-idea-is-a-bad-thing-d483592e03c https://evonews.com/business/leadership/2017/jul/03/an-insider-look-into-teal-swan-spiritual-healer-or-charismatic-cult-leader/ https://web.archive.org/web/20151107074624/http://www.jessicamystic.com/exposing-teal-scott-teal-swan-a-dangerous-spiritual-speaker.html

    Although she is a polemic figure, she seems to be notable, and her youtube channel has over 400,000 subscribers: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheSpiritualCatalyst

    Thanks for your help and consideration ~~Seeker~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.144.190 (talk) 20:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
    Also, none of what you wrote above has any bearing on notability, unless some of the reviews you list are from notable critics. Subscribers to a YouTube channel are irrelevant to notability here. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:51, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you Anachronist! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.144.190 (talk) 01:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Viet_Khang

    This is a bio of real person, an artist, a musician, a song writer "Publish changes" button below —Knowledge Seeker (talk) 21:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Việt Khang, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 21:19, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Ivan B

    Article was deleted because it did not have a credible claim of significance when the artist has videos with views of upwards of 10 million and this was listed in the article after an edit, and other songs with hundreds of thousands of views. The artist is thus, significant and important, and YouTube is a credible source. —Vargo2 (talk) 21:16, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Fusion360

    I edited this page from scratch yesterday and it has been removed and redirected to Autodesk please revert —Howe1 (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Howe1 this page hasn't been deleted, just redirected. See the page history, where your last revision is the second from the top. Lithopsian is the one who redirected the page, noting that they were doing so because it appeared that the content of the page was copied from a third party website, which isn't allowed. If you've written the article text yourself, then you may restore the page by undoing Lithopsian's edit. However, if you did copy and paste all or part of your text from a third party, you are still free to rewrite the page. You'll just need to make sure to start from scratch, writing in your own words. Cheers! Prodego talk 00:39, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    That was me. As noted, the article had been almost directly copied from the product website and there was essentially no saveable text. In the worst cases, copyright text will be completely removed, but in this case your original article is still present in the history. Typically product websites are copyright-protected, but even in cases where it is public domain or you are the copyright holder, it cannot be used in Wikipedia. You must write the article in your own words. Even closely paraphrasing from another source may be an issue, you can read WP:PLAGIARISM for (much!) more detail. If you do intend to rewrite the article, consider the notability criteria and promotional content guidelines. In particular, make sure you provide secondary or tertiary sources to establish notability and provide verification of claims. Lithopsian (talk) 20:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lawrence Anthony "Law" Fajardo

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cezartigno (talk) 03:56, 31 March 2018 (UTC) Creating Draft:Lawrence Anthony "Law" Fajardo[reply]

    User:Harshrathod50/Da Funk

    I created this page yesterday and deleted it today because someone removed a non-free image from it and this userbox lost its purpose. Now I got a free-image for it and therefore want it back, thankyou. —Harsh Rathod Poke me! 07:20, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Thankyou! Harsh Rathod Poke me! 18:46, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Saint Catherine Church of Loix

    I, Vloizeau, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vloizeau (talk) 17:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    CREATION TUBE

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Ahmed Zubayer (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Miss Krystle

    I, Feer53l9, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Feer53l9 (talk) 05:40, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Vere Wynne-Jones

    Hello. I am confused by the logs for this article. It looks like it was PRODed 3 months after a unanimous keep vote at AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vere Wynne-Jones. Can anyone check if there is a good version to restore? Thanks and regards, Biwom (talk) 09:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC) —Biwom (talk) 09:43, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done @Biwom: I have restored the edit history of the article, policy does say that as this was kept at AfD it should only be deleted as the result of a future AfD and not through PROD or A7. There are a couple of revisions belonging to the first creation which was deleted as a copyvio, I haven't restored those. Hut 8.5 14:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    The Talk Show

    This page was deleted in 2005 (by a now inactive and retired admin). I have no idea what the state of the article was at that point, but there is a new article at The Talk Show (podcast) that may be related and I'd like to see the old edit history in case there are some old relevant links I can hunt down through archive.org to make sense of the early history of the podcast. I will concede that this very well could be a complete coincidence and have no information relevant to the new article, but I still would like to try. It would be great if the history of this article could be moved into my user space for a short period of time so I can see if there is any relevance to the new article. Thanks! — - PaulT+/C 12:55, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • I don't think there's any content there you can salvage as they appear to be talking about completely different topics. The podcast in the deleted article was started in December 2005 and involves "Mike" chatting about anything he likes and promoting Morgan Dollar Records, the company which makes the podcast. The article noted that the podcast "consists of blocks of programming interrupted by commercials", which it makes out to be unusual or distinctive instead of being the way almost all radio shows work. The only link cited was [5]. Hut 8.5 14:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    I HAVE A RIGHT!

    The admin who deleted the article cited the reason given in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I HAVE A RIGHT!, which was an April Fool's Day nomination. In theory, the topic meets GNG criteria and can at least be improved and rewritten to eliminate the promotional tone. It exists on the Ukrainian Wikipedia until the title: uk:Я МАЮ ПРАВО! —««« SOME GADGET GEEK »»» (talk) 15:08, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    RootsTrust

    ==

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 84.189.207.1 (talk) 17:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:RootsTrust

    ==

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 84.189.207.1 (talk) 17:42, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=833629852"