Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

this header: view • edit

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Obraz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Vandalism of content and propaganda by the same fascist organization in the article. I had to restore the works of previous writers and added some more myself. Unreg. users remove valid content. The patriot2007 17:41, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- Steel 16:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Windows XP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Consistent, offensive vandalism by multiple IP addresses, assumed to be the same person. Harryboyles 16:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

User(s) blocked.. The two vandals from today have been blocked, other than them there's not a whole lot of vandalism. -- Steel 16:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Seleucid Empire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. A registered user repeteadly change a region's name according to a current conflict one side's POV. The registered user (ፈቃደ) openly belongs to one of the parts in war. 82.226.217.121 15:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

This user actually wants the page protected with the anachronistic and POV term "Palestine" when the region was historically and officially known as "Judah" and "Coele-Syria" during Seleucid times, and was only renamed from Judea to Palestina by the Romans in 135 as punishemnt for the Bar Kokhba revolt, to attempt to stamp out the name of Judah. It has not been called Palestine since 1948 either. A semi-protection would be more in order to stop this anon from repeatedly switching to 'Palestine'. ፈቃደ (ውይይት) 15:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Fully protected due to edit warring -- Steel 16:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Verica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect - repeated linkspam, from a different anonymous IP address every time. --Nicknack009 11:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Wizardman 13:42, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Hurricane Juan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect - Target of vandalism all throughout today. Yonatan (contribs/talk) 11:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined- a decent amount of vandalism, but the main page article is almost never protected, so declined by precedent.--Wizardman 13:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Can we get a 15-minute semiprotection? 18 vandal edits in the past 70 minutes or so. – Chacor 15:14, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Hmm, looks like it's slowed. Disregard, then. – Chacor 15:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

User:khalidkhoso (edit | [[Talk:User:khalidkhoso|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protect.vandlize from user User:Viridae,still disscusion on way but he is vandlizing my user page. Khalidkhoso 10:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Already protected. Though I hardly endorse the fact that Viridae did it himself. That said, he Viridae was removing comments out of line with policy. Semi-protection wouldn't have done anything anyway. --Robdurbar 11:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Template:911ct (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection to seek to ensure that current revert and counter revert subsides and consensus is achieved. A consensus building exercise is on the talk page currently. Template is target of controversy and much reversion Fiddle Faddle 07:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Fully protected --Robdurbar 11:31, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

List of Internet stations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Link spam target. Most additions are either spam links or to advertising articles that end up getting speedy deleted within a couple days. --PhantomS 06:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected--Robdurbar 11:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Columbia International University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. Has been subject to frivilous and unsubstantiated edits by IP users since Sept '06. It would appear that several users are attempting to air personal greviances agianst the instution in the Lifestyle Standards section as well as attempting to supress legitimate and factual information in the denominational relationships section. I have posted comments to the disccusion page and have reverted edits to no avail jackturner3 02:39, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Cbrown1023 talk 02:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Tard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full Protection. Constant edit war with someone who obviously dislikes some guy named Linus. See history of Tard as well as EllEffer's sockpuppet evidence page. Perhaps locking this page will get him to give up vandalizing, since he's obviously got access to a wide range of ips. --Snicker^|¥°^€| 00:59, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Fully protected as its only a redirect --Robdurbar 11:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

DevilDriver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protect. Due to high level of IP vandalism.
An unregisted user is changing the genre from debated, and reverting in to it's original. After this incident, I kindly posted a message telling all editors to not change the genres until the matter has been resolved on the articles talk page. I did this once again, for the same person reverted it again, and changing my comment in to this: "IF YOU CHANGE THIS I WILL SUCK YOUR BALLS OFF." Thus, I am requesting thats this article be semi-protected so this person will not be able to vandalise it any longer. Thank you.
Michael 00:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC) Mike5193

Declined This is a content dispute. I've given the user a civility warning. If he is invicil again or continues to revert he can be blocked; see no need to semi protect though. --Robdurbar 11:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

John Hancock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. This article has been a continuous target of drive-by IP vandalism almost since the get-go, due to Hancock's fame and the fact that his name is titillating to juveniles. Probably needed for the long-term. --Ziusudra 23:24, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected Cbrown1023 23:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Allah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full-protection - As the article has daily vandalism. Cloud02 23:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected Cbrown1023 23:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

John Huston (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism instructed by User:Mactabbed. WikiXan 22:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected Cbrown1023 23:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

LimeWire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection - Continuous vandalism of page by anons who put piracy links up continuously. Has restarted since page was last semi-protected. Darthnader37 22:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Semi-protected Cbrown1023 23:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Step by Step (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection - A vandal using multiple IPs and usernames continually posts the link Michael Laney into the article. None of the accounts used are established, and the IPs are never the same. A few days to a week of semi-protection might cause them lose interest... SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Cbrown1023 23:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Neopets (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection - LOTS of IP based vandal/promotional edits. Long term protection could also be an option! Corpx 21:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Already protected by Cbrown1023. Cbrown1023 23:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

War of the Pacific (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

full protection. Dispute between Bdean1963 and me has escalated into a full scale rv war that does not contributes to the article. Info that does not belong to the article is constantly posted with no discussion whatsoever. Same thing in Tacna Region and Treaty of Lima. Messhermit 21:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Fully protected Futhermore, you have both been warned for 3RR. Cbrown1023 23:40, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

NASA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protection Heavy recent vandalism. Retiono Virginian 16:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected Cbrown1023 17:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hilary Duff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi Protection Requested. Various IP addresses are continually vandalizing this page, adding highly defamatory information. It's getting rather tiresome removing it all the time. This page has been semi-protected previously, but it does not appear to be having the desired effect. Hersfold ^(talk|work) 02:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected Cbrown1023 03:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Steven E. Jones (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. Seriously lame edit war over templates, both nominated for deletion. Let it pass. Cool Hand Luke 23:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Cbrown1023 23:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Antigua Guatemala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Unregistered user, from the Atitlan Lake, keeps on deleting several valid links in the external link section and adding on the top a link from the Lake Atitlan area, which does not belong in a Section about Antigua Guatemala. rudygiron

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Cbrown1023 15:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Muhammad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Khalidkhoso 16:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

It has been semi-protected for 5 days now, but there is currently an edit war going on, so I have granted Fully protected. Cbrown1023 16:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Template:Ice hockey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This WikiProject is becoming more active and we want to add assessment to the project banner. It will be actively monitored for vandalism. Mus Musculus 16:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Occupation of Latvia 1940-1945 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The sole reason (?) for protecting this page was probably repeated addition and removal of POV tags (but 3RR should stop edit wars, anyway). Arbitration about the article has been filed, and I think that a certain tag question should not hinder constructive users from improving the article (which is the thing I wish to start again). Constanz - Talk 12:24, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Additional information that (of course) the user forgot to add: he is waging edit wars over the article for two months now, removing tags placed by other users, and was already blocked once for 3RR on that article. Suggest to leave it protected at the moment. -- Grafikm ^(AutoGRAF) 13:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

What you forgot to add was that there are twice as many users who remove the tags than the people who add those. And I haven't seen one constructive edit by your gang relating to the article.Constanz - Talk 17:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Piotr blass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

There is currently an existing (though running through AFD) page about this guy at Piotr Blass. It should be redirected there. Milto LOL pia 06:37, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Royal Rumble (2007) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

A conflict started over the placements of the matches prior to the PPV. Now that the PPV is over, the matches will be put in the order of which they occured. Tv145033 06:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Unprotected --Robdurbar 14:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Azerbaijan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Why the page Azerbaijan has been protected again? Unprotection is requested, please. Thanks in advance! Famia 23:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Not unprotected There is currently an edit war going on that you are a participant in, it will be unprotected on January 30. Cbrown1023 23:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Princess Charming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Locked for more than 10 days due to lack of sources. A newspaper article indicated that the pilot episode of the show will be aired this Monday.[[1]] -Danngarcia 16:42, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Not unprotected take it to WP:DRV. Cbrown1023 22:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

24 (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Page has been locked for 10 days. I think the vandalism war is over now. --Jwikipro 16:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Unprotected Cbrown1023 16:15, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Leo Sayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Leo Sayer was originally protected due of the effect of publicity his TV appearences a few weeks ago, but now he hasn't appeared or even been mentioned on the TV for up to 2 weeks so it might aswell be unprotected. Retiono Virginian 15:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Unprotected Cbrown1023 15:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Template:Dated_prod (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per req at talk page. Posting here since {{Editprotected}} gets ignored. —Dgies^t c 03:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Done. --Robdurbar 15:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

User talk:Lir (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

The current thing says that the block will be lifted on December 1, 2006, but the user page says that it will be lifted on December 10, 2007. Please fix for consistency. Hbdragon88 02:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Done. Nishkid64 02:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Fulfilled/denied requests

Console Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The arguments have been moved to the main Wikipedia article on generation categories. Please unprotect this page as it is seriously out of date on its figures.75.21.138.94 01:11, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Console wars Unprotected --Robdurbar 11:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Lord & Taylor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

The page has been semi-protected for 35 days. I think its been long enough. --Caldorwards4 05:05, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Unprotected--Wizardman 05:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Parry Aftab (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Forum vandals. --Wafulz 05:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected--Wizardman 05:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Daniel J. Geduld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. Users from the website Somethingawful.com keep vandalizing this page (check history) FlyingSquid 03:23, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection.--Wizardman 03:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

March Days (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full Protect. I have added material directly related to the historical events, and every single sentence of it is reference. I haven't removed a single sentence, just added sections of material. Yet User:Nareklm vandalized the site and removed hours of work, and reverted back to old 5-line version without any valuable explanation. Please, protect this page at its current version, or if it's changed protect it at version: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=March_Days&oldid=103363190 . Otherwise, this kind of behavior discourages any kind of contribution to Wikipedia. Kinds thanks. Tengri 17:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Fully protected We can't protect the version of your choosing, but we can protect whatever is up there at the current time. It just so happens, that it was the version you prefer. Cbrown1023 21:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Dora the Explorer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection- I was told if the vandals kept vandalizing something would be done, its still going on and no ones doing anything. Also the episode list page is currently in an edit war, some one removes the summaries then someone else reverts it, I've tried on my own to stop this but no ones listening. Superx 02:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Cbrown1023 talk 02:55, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Haredim and Zionism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full Protection
A massive edit war over the JAZ and JNZ links. --Shaul avrom 02:10, 29 January 2007 (UTC) User_Talk:Shaul_avrom

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cbrown1023 talk 02:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Azer Red (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and User talk:Azer Red (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection - I would like my user and user talk pages semi-protected, as I suspect that I have recently become the target of anon trolls due to a page that I created recently.--Azer Red Si? 01:09, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected Cbrown1023 talk 02:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)`

Tacna Region (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full Protection. Same problem with Bdean1963. Apparently, he is not going to gave up his disruptive behavior and unilateral interpretation of a legal and valid International Treaty. Messhermit 00:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Fully protected Cbrown1023 00:34, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Polar Bear (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Vandalism from several IPs recently. Xiner (talk, email) 00:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected Cbrown1023 00:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Ponygon and Kafk Sunbeam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Frequent addition of blatantly false information. JuJube 16:10, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Cbrown1023 17:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Chess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

unprotection. It's been protected since the 11th. Give it a shot. Zbl 14:16, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Not unprotected its has semi protection you can edit if you want, semi only prevents IP/new accounts editing the article Gnangarra 14:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Football (soccer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Persistent IP vandalism whenever this is unprotected. Chris Cunningham 15:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected - strong case for long term protection, 5 requests in 4 months(all granted), article is already an FA how much more can be contributed to the article? Gnangarra 15:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Shirt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Users seem to be treating this article like a message board. Anthony Rupert 15:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected 14/20 edits IP nonsense and vandalism other 6 reverts Gnangarra 15:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Joe DiMaggio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi protection Neumerous IP are adding nonsence and targeting one user who reverts the nonsence lease immeadtly prtoect page and warn users.--Lucy-marie 14:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected IP vandalism Gnangarra 15:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Surrealism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. High level of edit warring by registered editors over certain links being added/removed. Some editors have had a 24 hour block for 3RR violations, but I fear that it will restart when the block ends. Some mediation is ongoing and hopefully the block will allow things to cool down and a resolution reached. Jem 11:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined Problem with two users. If they insist on reverting when they come back, we block them 3rr or not. --Robdurbar 11:29, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Black supremacy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

- Full partial protection? Edit war over keeping or deleting a paragraph is getting out of control. I'd like it if an admin would take a look. Rbaish keeps adding POV anti-civil rights text. Please help. futurebird 05:37, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Possible sock puppet Rbaish --> 71.112.7.212 ? It seems pretty odd that this random ip user knew to add this text back to this page. futurebird 05:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Okay partial protection, not full.... Just to keep these ips from reverting things...futurebird 06:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. only 2 IP edits in last 48 hours Gnangarra 10:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Grossmont High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection requested. High level of IP and new user vandalism; adding fake notable alumni. Kubigula (talk) 05:42, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected - new user has been blocked indef already so semi should be enough Gnangarra 10:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Black Panther Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

- Full protection- multiple incidents of vandalism (most with a racial inappropriate content), multiple cases of removal of content causing time and energy to be spent correcting the valdalism, but the more important aspect is individuals with no accounts seeing this as a way to promote "hate". I think the latter is of particular concern given the fact that many young children that now use wikipedia for their class work.PEACETalkAbout 02:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Please see today's entries in just the talk page:[2]

[3] Can the talk page be protected too? or Semi protected? PEACETalkAbout 04:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

garra, Thanks! I can live with semi protected. If some thing is clearly offensive on the talk page can I remove it? This would solve that if that is permitted. The examples are noted above. Thank you..PEACETalkAbout 19:48, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Semi-protected as there are editors that appear to be working to improve the article, I'm reluctant to place full protection. I've havent protected the talk page Gnangarra 09:51, 28 January 2007 (UTC)