Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guanaco (talk | contribs) at 10:20, 27 September 2018 (→‎File:Tomica_71_1.jpg: d). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts
    "WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion

    Digital Vidya

    Digital Vidya is one of the successful startups in India; the page has been live for quite a long time and people from many countries contributed and helped to establish the credibility of the page. Requesting to review and retrieve the page.

    Alok Kejriwal

    Alok Kejriwal is a globally acclaimed entrepreneur, mentor, speaker and author. His wikipedia page has been live for several years. The page was spammed many times in past and then retrieved. This time it has been deleted. Requesting to review and retrieve the page.

    Draft:Maxime Ferrari

    I, Blaise.baquiche, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Blaise.baquiche (talk) 17:05, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:XSEDE (Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment)

    I, PrussianOwl, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PrussianOwl (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Yiannis Dimitras

    I intend to work on the article, including adding sources which should fix the BLP concerns. —Lucky102 (talk) 23:39, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done the article did have a link to a reliable source which had gone dead, I've fixed that but it could do with more sources. Hut 8.5 20:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:List of fellows of the Royal Society of New Zealand

    Please undelete and move to User:Stuartyeates/List of fellows of the Royal Society of New Zealand. —Stuartyeates (talk) 03:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Stratanium

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Scanpanusa (talk) 04:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Currently this looks like an ad, so it will have to be rewritten. Secondly your account looks to be a company, and therefore you must make it sound like a person (eg Freda from Scanpanusa), and Thirdly, I assume that you are being paid by Scanpan, so you must make a WP:Paid editing disclosure. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Paul Flood

    Article was deleted by PROD as failing GNG and the soccer-specific notability guideline WP:NFOOTY. Subject does pass NFOOTY, but the article at time of PRODding neither demonstrated nor stated how. I'd like to work on it. Thanks, —Struway2 (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Grigori Babayan

    Restore this article because this football manager is a main coach of FC Astana. [1] Kazakhstan Premier League is a fully pro league. —91.124.117.194 (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Shields

    I, Babelfisher, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Babelfisher (talk) 17:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Monkey Series (books)

    I, Mwenechanga, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mwenechanga (talk) 18:12, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Hembree (band)

    Artist charted on Mediabase Alt Radio and is cited in multiple high-profile publications (NPR, Rolling Stone). Meets retainer criteria. —Musicman211 (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

     Done @Musicman211: I've restored it not based on the merits your claims about the band but because WP:Articles for deletion/Hembree (band) closed as a soft delete due to low participation. Be advised that the article could easily be renominated for deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 00:07, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Edwin Dean Benton II

    I, Edwinb33, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Edwinb33 (talk) 23:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Took time to learn how to submit properly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinb33 (talk • contribs) 23:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC) ——C.Fred (talk) 00:01, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
    @Edwinb33: Please address the lack of independent reliable sources immediately. Wikipedia is not a webhost; you cannot have a draft up about yourself indefinitely. —C.Fred (talk) 00:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bay Area Rainbow Symphony

    I, Fan of composer Rebecca Clarke, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fan of composer Rebecca Clarke (talk) 03:31, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Hong Kong Olympiad in Informatics

    The article was deleted for not being updated. However it's the most important programming competition in Hong Kong and one of the feeder competitions of International Olympiad in Informatics. We would like to restore the page and then update it. Thank you —- Microtony 05:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:digital Marketing Badge.png

    It is owned by the owner" button below —Sajit Kumar (talk) 08:44, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    This file is not yet deleted. So who is the owner? Have they licensed it with a free license? Or is it used under fair use in an article? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Neoteric Evolutionary Theory

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —DeQuinceyMalden (talk) 12:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC) Neoteric is a word, though rare, to denote a departure from accepted doctrine. Darwin himself, in introducing a 'neoteric' approach to human origins, was also ridiculed. He used hard (fossil) evidence and his conclusions now widely accepted. But in Darwin's own writings (Darwin, Charles, Notebook 'M' (103) Cambridge University Darwin Archive) he 'mused' (though not in his formal presentation to the Royal Scociety) that 'it is solely the comparison with past ideas, which makes consciousness - & which tells one of reality". This is also quoted in 'Femina Sapiens, Patriarchy, Tyranny and the Origins of Sexual Psyche'. (p81) by this author. The 'Neoteric' approach might be seen as an encapsulation of 'new' ideas but is based on a thorough accumulation of fact and serious examination of evidence and unequivocal fact (surely something close to the heart of Wikipedias legions of officinados?) Recent work by Prof. Martinon-Torre (University of London),Prof.Josh Akey (Washington University,Seattle), Prof. Chris Stringer Natural History Museum London, Sonia Harmand (Stony Brook University), Prof. Mark Findlayson (University of Gibraltar) provide a sizeable amount of evidence in individual and exhaustive papers too numerous to list as supporting references, but together justifying obvious inferences with regard to the processe of human evolution. The modest indication that the definition of 'human' is not determined by skull shape or size is obvious and apparently elicited the proposed deletion of the contribution; the floresensian group (only a metre tall, with a tiny skull) yet produced finely crafted and elegant tools. The simple outcome of the body of work on Human Evolution which may (or may not) be called 'Neoteric', demonstrates that human thought processes (which define the human - or is that in contention?) commenced earlier than 3.3 million years ago, as demonstrated by Harmand's work at Olduvai. Thus, given the collective work of all involved in paleoanthropology, we mgiht concur (presumably) that Darwin's (fleeting but apposite) reference to recall as the precursor of all conscious activity is beyond dispute. The Neoteric Evolutionary theory encapsulates the obvious outcomes that result from human niche expansion, accelerated by consciousness and continuous feed-back driven by recall. Together, the advance of humans far beyond the attainments of close relatives and attendant mental and cultural feedback, and collectively named the 'recall paradigm', is worthy of being retained as and informed, informative and well researched contribution.DeQuinceyMalden (talk) 12:24, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    The page is not deleted -- see Neoteric evolutionary theory however if you don't want it to be deleted, state your case in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neoteric evolutionary theory. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:30, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Even if we would have been able to restore the page (AfD'd articles generally don't get restored unless there was no participation in the AfD), your massive wall of text doesn't really help. A more concise responce generally gets better results. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Codacy

    Codacy is one of the mostly influential startups in the Portuguese ecosystem. We have highly contributed for the current awareness of Lisbon as a hub for tech in Europe. We are highly committed to the open source community serving over 100,000 users. Our position as one the most widely used tools for automated code review leads us to believe we are a relevant reference in the market, highly contributing for the reduction in global tech debt, recent estimates put ‘Bad code’ costing companies $85 billion annually - and Software engineering efficiency having $3 trillion impact on global GDP. Codacy was the winner of the 2014 Websummit Startup competition and since has created over 40 jobs, raised over $7m in funding. —87.103.12.122 (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    What are some of the WP:Reliable sources you would use to keep the article from being deleted again? A quick Google search isn't showing me anything terribly useful. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    From the way you keep saying "we" and "our" I suggest you read WP:COI. I'm not really inclined to restore this at the request of someone with an obvious conflict of interest. Hut 8.5 15:22, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Vicente Aguirre

    I do not know why it was deleted, I want to have a copy at least. —Soaguirre (talk) 16:05, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    It was deleted because its author blanked it or otherwise tagged it for G7. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Done @Soaguirre: it was deleted because you asked for it to be deleted. If you don't want a page to be deleted then don't ask for it. It's back now. Hut 8.5 15:23, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    OmniMark

    This appears to have been deleted via PROD rather than after an AfD discussion. OmniMark is a long-standing programming language that's been used in publishing since the 1990s. It's the subject of several books listed in WorldCat (including manuals, programming guides, and even the proceedings of an annual users group meeting), and has an established Library of Congress subject heading. While it may be somewhat obscure to many today (both due to its age, and its specialized target audience) it's a notable language in the history of computing and electronic publishing, particularly in the processing of SGML and descendant markup languages, including those that underlie web sites like this one. The article as deleted may need better citations and sources, but it should not be summarily deleted (and certainly not without the chance for broader discussion). —JohnMarkOckerbloom (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Proposed deletions are only deleted if nobody objects within 7 days. They can be and are restored here on request (as the request is interpreted as an objection to the PROD after the fact). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:54, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, please consider this to be a request to undelete. I plan to fill in some details (with citations) about the language's history, and clean out some of the fluff, after it comes back. Thanks! JohnMarkOckerbloom (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Hut 8.5 15:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:KeepSolid VPN Unlimited

    I, WalkingTheWire, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WalkingTheWire (talk) 18:50, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Computer Science House

    This page looks like it was deleted for lack of citations. I have made a few edits to this page in the past and would be willing to spend more time to improve the citations. —lonnez (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Villa Sound

    I, Adamhfair, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adamhfair (talk) 03:52, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 15:41, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    greg herman

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —99.60.176.51 (talk) 07:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Dear Wikipedia,

    We hope we are writing this to the correct individual and bringing attention to a recently deleted page for our client: Greg Herman. We noticed that his page went missing and we feel was unfairly deleted. It has been posted for many years with few changes. The Greg Herman brand and name is strong is well known in the fashion world with Greg contributing greatly to the field of accessories, etc. The reason for deletion was: (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) by user: Ritchie333.

    The article in no way represented unambiguous advertising nor promotion. For this user to delete this is unwarranted. Had the user had an issue, he/she could of edited. However, they took action that was unwarranted and over the top.This page should not have been deleted, and we ask that it be restored. Thanking you in advance for your help in the matter.

    Best,

    Robyn Davis

    G11 deletions are generally not restored here; nine times out of ten they would need far more than a couple of edits to be acceptable. (It's also incredibly common to the point of absurdity for someone who's written or has a stake in a page that's been identified as promotional to claim that it isn't; you have a reason to make that case that doesn't involve Wikipedia's core goals.) In addition, you are obligated to disclose the relationship between you and your client and should have done so well before this point. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:36, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. You should also read WP:COI. Hut 8.5 15:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Canowindra-2804-postmark

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Silent Billy (talk) 11:11, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    I've got no idea why there was problem with the image. I got no idea why some ds deleted it. Nobody sent me a bloody message that there might be a problem. No wonder that the number of editors is in decline. Silent Billy (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Silent Billy: the reason given for the deletion is that you didn't specify a source for the image. Furthermore although the image description claimed the image was being done as fair use, the image was tagged as being available under a free licence and didn't include a full fair use rationale. I'm not sure use of this image in that context meets WP:NFCC either. If you have further questions I suggest you talk to the deleting admin (User:Explicit). Hut 8.5 15:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Oronzo Persano

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Giantronik (talk) 12:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The old version is now visible in the page's edit history. Hut 8.5 15:49, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Doctor at home - Portea

    Draft:Doctor at home - Portea

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Tihonata (talk) 22:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Forward and backward Euler method.svg

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Joseph.slater (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    I created this file, I haven't logged in for a long (very long time). As the creator, I simply failed to assign copyright properly.

    Unfortunately, I lost my copy in a hard drive failure in December 2017, so I can't upload it again. Joseph.slater (talk) 01:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Joseph.slater: You requested restoration back in July and then didn't do anything. Can we be assured that you will fix the problem this time around? ~Anachronist (talk) 23:08, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Joseph.slater: so what license do you wish to grant? I suggest dual license with CC-BY-SA-4.0 and GFDL since code is included. If you specify a license the file can come back. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:20, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Kenji Okajima

    I, 133.3.201.51, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 133.3.201.51 (talk) 08:11, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Untitled X-23 film

    I, Adamstom.97, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. adamstom97 (talk) 20:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Cruise1st

    As far as we are aware as a company, we haven't broken any guidelines with our Wikipedia page. Cruise1st are a legitimate business that deal in the cruise travel industry. We are based in the Lowry Outlet Mall in Manchester. We have a neutral point of view in explaining what Cruise1st are about and we are fully aware that Wikipedia isn't a place to promote products or services to the public. The goal's "just the facts" and we have tried to inform the public of what are services as cruise travel agents are. —148.252.229.178 (talk) 13:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cruise1st, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ReaderofthePack (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Paramount Singers

    I, ProfessorTom, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ProfessorTom (talk) 20:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @ProfessorTom:  Done, restored, but there was only one line of text in it. Please see WP:BAND for inclusion criteria that this ensemble needs to meet before they can have an article on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Motorcycle Roadracing Association

    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjbbrewer (talk • contribs) 00:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Hyper RPG

    I, Fateor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Fateor (talk) 00:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Stefan Baretzki

    Notable Auschwitz guard, redlinked on several articles —Catrìona (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please fix this up! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Wrong Answer (upcoming film)

    I wasn’t given a proper heads up this draft had exceeded the 6 month maximum between edits. I’d like it restored please cause I don’t wish to reassemble all the information gathered for this draft. —Rusted AutoParts 00:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft talk:ComedyShortsGamer

    This talk page was deleted as G8. But G8 didn't actually apply as Draft:ComedyShortsGamer existed, and the talk page had been recreated. The deleted revisions for the talk page should therefore be restored. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:08, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

     Done, history restored. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Wrongworld

    I, Sludj, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sludj (talk) 03:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


    I now have several additional notable, reliable sources for citation purposes —Sludj (talk) 03:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Tomica_71_1.jpg

    This file was deleted as it was transferred to Commons. It's a copyvio because the photo is a derivative work of the toy, but we can keep it here as fair use. Please ping me once it's undeleted so I can add the fair use rationale. ——Guanaco 05:54, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    . —Guanaco 10:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Sir William Curtius

    I, Somej, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Somej (talk) 10:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Cloudistics

    I, Bozhestvo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bozhestvo (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Contains significant copyvio - the "Product" section is taken from [2] for example. If restored the restoring admin should try to evaluate the rest. Hut 8.5 20:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    VOX Cinemas

    page can be redirected with history in tact, or should be sent to AFD —Jax 0677 (talk) 16:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    But there isn't a value to Wikipedia to restore promotional material. You need to take this up with the deleting admin, JamesBWatson (talk · contribs). ~Anachronist (talk) 16:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Bad

    I, 213.55.211.19, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 213.55.211.19 (talk) 19:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Thomas Ewing French

    I, Tomfromtulsa, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tomfromtulsa (talk) 20:36, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Instana

    I, FabianLange, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FabianLange (talk) 12:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Graeme Bartlett: Thank you Graeme! Added some new material and references, general polishing and uploaded a logo as well. Hope its good this time :-) FabianLange (talk) 09:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cathy Phillips/sandbox/Farm Fresh To You

    12.146.16.42 (talk) 15:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:50, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Sam Zietz

    I, Esmarin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Esmarin (talk) 15:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    William Hofeldt

    The composer may not be too notable, but is probably more notable than Brodiaea orcuttii. Also, a Google search for Hofeldt has a hit for "william hofeldt wikipedia". Thoughts? —Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 17:06, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Hdjensofjfnen: For A7 speedy deletions, you need to ask the deleting admin, Shirt58 (talk · contribs). ~Anachronist (talk) 17:52, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Anachronist and Shirt58:: Pinging Shirt58. Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 01:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Text of deleted article now at User:Hdjensofjfnen/William Hofeldt.
    As
    (a) this was an WP:A7 deletion
    (b) the Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion edit notice says "please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here"
    (c) Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy
    deemed a Wikipedia:Userfication request, and done. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:09, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    (I would appreciate if someone could put the little green ✓ on this request, as my attempts have resulted in Wikicode errors)

    File:Corel Painter IX.jpg

    this is not my image, but I can make a case for it —Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Kintetsubuffalo:  Done, restored. You have a week to make a case for it (add a rationale) before it is deleted again. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! Done, hope it's acceptable--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Trollbeads

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —LisaLovstrom90 (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Not sure why the page was deleted, if there are material issues with the article i would prefer to be able to edit and resubmit.

    Nothing was deleted. Your draft was moved to User:LisaLovstrom90/Trollbeads and only the redirect that was left behind was deleted, so no information was lost. shoy (reactions) 20:58, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:GORUCK

    CSD G11 is not supposed to be agressively applied to Draft namespace, however I've been asked by the company to try and resurrect the draft so that we could potentially move to mainspace. As there is a COI, I fully intend to submit this via AFC to give an opportunity for an outside view to review. Even though it was deleted under G11 it was not deleted from acticle space under that rationalle. @RHaworth: as the deleting admin. — Hasteur (talk) 00:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Can we have a look at the article from pre-deletion? — Hdjensofjfnen (If you want to trout me, go ahead!) 01:47, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    You really don't want to see it. It's not only disgustingly promotional, and "sourced" to the company's own website and PR, it's mindbogglingly sub-literate in spelling, punctuation and grammar. -- Orange Mike | Talk 07:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • "Mindbogglingly sub-literate" - are you thinking about the right article? Restored. I am not sure how it came to my attention - it never seems to have had a speedy tag. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Anto Morra

    I, FreenaLynda, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FreenaLynda (talk) 07:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=861426839"