Jump to content

User talk:Zurich00swiss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Done

[edit]

@146.90.90.43
What do you mean, is an help request or a invite for participate at the discussion in RMS52's talk.
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 11:36, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don`t have an email, I removed it due to spam and adds. 217.39.23.1 (talk) 06:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Need to get another one soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.39.23.1 (talk) 06:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm back!

[edit]

Hello Zurich00swiss! Just wanted to say that I am back, I was a bit bummed out at another user so I thought about retiring, but I changes my mind! RMS52 (talk) 07:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, my edit on Gatwick Airport was not vandalism, it was not notable and the article is so large that this section wouldn't be notable. RMS52 (talk) 07:23, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:RMS52 Ok thanks, fortunately you are returning. I was very sad because you were blocking, I wanted to look for you on social like facebook to convince you to come back, but luckily you have done alone, otherwise Wikipedia had lost one of the best user in the aeronautical project!
P.S. Sorry for my bad english!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 07:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome! Thanks for sticking up for me on WilliamJE's talk page. RMS52 (talk) 07:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scandinavian Airlines may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and [[Boeing 737NG]] at the bases in Stockholm and Oslo. As of Dec 2014, the McDonnell Douglas [[MD80|MD-80s] have been phased out. There were six leased A320s in the SAS fleet at the beginning

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:25, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry I change my edit!--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 22:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melbourne Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skywest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry I reverted my edit.
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 07:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your work on removing destination maps from airport/airline articles and cleaning them up! RMS52 Talk to me 16:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Formatting

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add references to articles, it would help if you could enhance the reference by formatting it correctly. You can do this by using the "cite web" template.

Thank you, ReflinkerMS Reflinker 09:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cephalonia International Airport

[edit]

From 25 October 2015, some Aegean Airline flights will be passed on to Olympic Air. As you can see on aegeanair.com, like you just said, the flight will continue to be operated (and sold on aegeanair.com), however under OA's code. Notice the difference and please revert your edit. Thank you Thakaran (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Thakaran
Ok, I reverted my edit but the next time you can give a reliable source.
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:AIRPORTS, an airline's schedule (and it doesn't get more reliable than that I believe) is always implicitly referenced, that's we we never use the homepage of an airline as reference. Thakaran (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's correct, but sometimes there are changes that are showed only in the booking system of the airline. For example, an airline rarely says to newspapers that is stopping a flight, but we can see it on the website. Anyway, I don't know exactly what your problem is, so if there are better sources the home page is not to use, but if it's the unic source, it is more useful for wikipedia having this source than nothing. Wjkxy (talk) 16:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Thakaran, @@Wjkxy
In a lot of airports there is this written: PLEASE DO NOT ADD OR REMOVE ROUTES WITHOUT GIVING A VALID SOURCE. EXACT DATES ARE MANDATORY FOR NEW ROUTES TO BE ADDED HERE AS PER WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT (BULLET #11). ALSO ADD INLINE CITATIONS IF POSSIBLE.
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 16:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel the airline's website should be added as reference for a new route, fine, I'll do it from now on, although I find no point in doing so. Thakaran (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate for aircraft of the Week

[edit]
Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-700 at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport

The ### aircraft who is candidate to AIRCRAFT OF THE WEEK is this Boeing 737-700 N781WN of Southwest Airlines.
This aircraft is painted in New Mexico One Livery and in this photo we can see the aircraft on the runway at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport.
This plane was delivered to Southwest in 2000 as New Mexico One, but its tail was repainted in 2005 to match the rest of Southwest's fleet in "Canyon Blue". It is unknown whether the plane will be repainted again to match the new "Heart" fleet colors introduced in 2014
Southwest has a tradition of Painting aircraft in the flags of the states they serve. New Mexico's state flag has been rated as the best designed flag in the North America (including the US, Canada, and territories) by the North American Vexillological Association. This is in part due to the meanings behind the symbols and colors of the flag. Between the name of the airline and the flag, this is the best representation of the Southwest region of the U.S.
Southwest Airlines is the world's largest low-cost carrier, followed by Ryanair, and the United States' fourth largest airline in terms of passengers.
Southwest does not participate in an airline alliance, but in the past has participated in codeshare agreement with other airlines. Through these agreements, there have been times when Southwest purchased the airlines outright, and folded it into their operations, as was the case with ATA Airlines in 2008, and AirTran Airways in 2014.
In order to keep costs low, and keep standardization amongst the fleet, Southwest has only ever owned Boeing 737's, and only for a short while did they lease 727's during their early operations. They have been the launch customer for the 737-300, -500, -700, and will be the launch customer for the 7-MAX 7 and -MAX 8.
The airline serves 41 U.S. states, and through their acquisition of AirTran, has now penetrated the low-cost carrier market for Mexico and the Caribbean, and even going as far south as Costa Rica. Southwest also has plans to start serving Canadian markets in the near future, upon the arrival of their new 737-800's.

That is my candidate for AOTW Ramos Can't hear you, TYPE LOUDER!! 19:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Drumlineramos
many thanks, the next Sunday or Monday it will be posted on my user page, please continue to follow me and later vote the best plane of this month!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 21:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
your aircraft of the week was posted on my User page, thanks.
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 20:43, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

[edit]

I'm greatly interested in Aviation. Will you ever edit articles on Helicopters or Spacecraft? FiendYT (talk) 02:49, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:FiendYT
Sorry I responded at the uncorrected answer
I'm interested mostly in civil aviation (civil airplanes, airports and aircraft companies).
If you would to talk with me about aviation please contact me here in my talk page or on my email that you can found in my user page.
And are you interested in civil aviation?
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 11:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Totally! FiendYT (talk) 23:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:FiendYT
What's your favorite airport, and what's you favourite airline??
My favourite airport are Zurich airports and Pisa airport because is near me!!
my favorite airline is SWISS!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 09:06, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
My favorite airport is San Francisco International Airport, cause I live near there, and my favorite airline are JetBlue, Southwest, and Star Alliance. :D FiendYT (talk) 20:19, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:FiendYT
oh wow SFO is a great airport!
Would you became a pilot when you are adult?
I'm 15/16 years and the next year I would to start the first level of pilot, when I can pilot CEESNA, PIPER and other little aircraft!
Is very cool talk with an American because the hours, the life is totally different than in Italy!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 07:10, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hahaha! I love your style my friend. Of course I would be a pilot when I grow up! Although I'm thinking about the airfare too. Some nice jets to fly in! Are we able to talk somewhere else? Maybe Skype or something to make things easier? FiendYT (talk) 16:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling Corrections

[edit]

May I correct any spelling errors on your user page or articles you've created/edited? FiendYT (talk) 02:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:FiendYT
Certainly go ahead...
Thanks for the barnstar, If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me! :)
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 11:22, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook

[edit]

I removed your edit on User talk:RMS52--it's probably not a good idea to put that kind of personal information out there. You can always use the email function for that. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have messages!

[edit]
Hello, Zurich00swiss. You have new messages at MrWooHoo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Votation

[edit]

As you probably know, I vote the BAe Jetstream 32 OY-SVB of Sun Air of Scandinavia. Ciao. Wjkxy (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Wjkxy
Ok, the final winner will be revealed the 1st of October!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 12:44, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I VOTE AVRO RJ100 SWISS GLOBAL AIRLINES "ZURICH AIRPORT" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.90.97.101 (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@5.90.97.101
THANKS
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 20:25, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft of the week

[edit]

Hello, what's the deal with this? [1] I do not recall signing up for aviation-related announcements, nor am I member of such WikiProjects. — MusikAnimal talk 14:12, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:MusikAnimal
Oh sorry, I would to write to another user, and when I edit, I edit with my mobile phone and I'm very inexpert with it!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 14:19, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft of the week

[edit]

I appreciate your enthusiasm but I just have to remind you that things like "Aircraft of the week" is not what your user page is for, appreciate if you stop and remove it from your user page and cease to leave messages on other users or any pages, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 16:30, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with User:MilborneOne, as per Wikipedia:User pages this is not an appropriate use for a user page on Wikipedia. Perhaps you should start your own blog instead. - Ahunt (talk) 17:09, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. I commend you for your enthusiasm and for the apparent attempt to motivate others, but I'm afraid this is a violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST and should be abandoned. Edits such as this and this are wholly inappropriate. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:16, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:RichardOSmith, @@User:Ahunt, @@@User:MilborneOne
Oh well so you always have to ruin everything ...
I at least can leave the photo of the aircraft with the text without other users opinions?
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 18:41, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Don't forget that you are only here to build an encyclopedia and given your previous block history you should probably try to stay very focussed on that. The advice you are being offered is intended to be of help to you; "Oh well so you always have to ruin everything" is therefore an unfortunate response. Perhaps it is a merely a language issue. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have to reinforce what User:RichardOSmith has said. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social networking service or forum. If you aren't here to build an encyclopedia then you are in the wrong place and should be on a blog or forum instead. It is not that the idea of nominating and discussing an "aircraft of the week" is wrong, it is just that this is not the right place on the internet for that sort of thing. - Ahunt (talk) 19:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:RichardOSmith, @@User:Ahunt, @@@User:MilborneOne
is a month that I write every day and choose the "AIRCRAFT OF THE WEEK" and only now after a month of work I need to delete everything? a user engaged in this discussion will have on his user page over 100 photos and at this point even Wikipedia is a photo gallery ... if I could I would like to ask if the AIRCRAFT OF THE WEEK could be left alone with my opinions?
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 19:54, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In short: "no", because it violates WP:NOTBLOG, which is a Wikipedia policy. There is no wiggle room there. I would suggest you remove it all and take it to a real blog site. Given your long block history and difficulties here on Wikipedia with falsifying references, personal attacks and all that, intentionally violating this policy, even after it has been pointed out to you may just result in a permanent block for you, as it is clear that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. - Ahunt (talk) 20:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:RichardOSmith, @@User:Ahunt, @@@User:MilborneOne
to my disappointment I delate all ... Thanks :(
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 20:22, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
...briefly. RichardOSmith (talk) 22:13, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We seem to have some second thoughts here about adhering to policy. Enjoy your time off. - Ahunt (talk) 22:50, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. RichardOSmith (talk) 22:52, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving

[edit]

I see that here and here you referred in edit summaries to archiving. However, you did not archive the discussions: you simply removed them. Archiving is not just removing content, it is moving the content to an archive file to keep for future reference. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:JamesBWatson
Hello, ok, I've made a mistake...
But I stayed a month to write and think about the "AIRCRAFT OF THE WEEK" and now I've see that an aministrator delates all things in my user page.
many users sayd that they block me because I'm on wikipedia just for the "AIRCRAFT OF THE WEEK" I've done this section only to involve users in aviation sector and for write interesting thing in the same sector.
could be my user page restored?
And could be the section of the "AIRCRAFT OF THE WEEK" re-written definitely without the opinions of others users and not in form of blogs?
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 10:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As you know, this has been discussed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. That being so, it is not helpful to ask an individual administrator on a user talk page to unilaterally overturn the decision which is under discussion there. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm going to restate this here since I want to make sure that you are aware of this. The answer to your question is no - you cannot re-add Aircraft of the Week to Wikipedia in any form or fashion, regardless of whether or not someone else contributes. Wikipedia is not a webhost and the material has been deemed unsuitable for Wikipedia in any form or fashion. I have bolded and italicized this because I want to make sure that you understand that this is non-negotiable. Right now people are questioning whether or not you should be blocked from editing and the person who unblocked you (JamesBWatson) has expressed concern that a re-blocking may be inevitable. What you need to do right now is show that you understand that this should not be re-added to Wikipedia and you also need to show how you will improve upon the concerns posted by James at ANI. Re-adding the material to Wikipedia, whether it be now or later, can very likely end with you getting re-blocked - and it will be more difficult for you to be unblocked after this point since so many people tried to explain things to you and you either seem to be unwilling or unable to understand this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:51, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I need to stress that there is a good possibility that the ANI thread may end with you being blocked even if you do not repost the information, if you give off the impression that you will repost it anyway. I can't stress this enough, that you need to show that you understand that Wikipedia is not a blog, promise that you will not re-add this information and that you will try to address the concerns brought up by James about your general editing, of which there were many. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:54, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Tokyogirl79
Ok sorry I've made a really big mistake. I now understand what you mean and I wont post again aircraft of the week!
I have another question, I'd like to know why have you deleted all my user page and not only the section of this issue? And may I repost my previous user page?
Thanks a lot and sorry
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 11:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Even if we ignore the "aircraft of the week", most of your user page consisted of stuff such as "My favourites airports", "European airports ranking in my opinion", and so on, i.e. you were using the page as a personal web page to store information about your personal interests, unrelated to work for the encyclopaedia. Although that did not belong in a Wikipedia user page, I would not have deleted it, as it was fairly minor. However, now that it has been deleted, to restore it would be inappropriate. There was one short section, headed My "history", which was about your work on Wikipedia, and I would see no problem with re-creating that, or something similar. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In view of my comment immediately above this one, I was astonished to see that you have gone ahead and re-created your user page, including the stuff about "My favourites airports", "My favourite airline ", and "My favourites airplanes". Did you not understand what I wrote, or are you just determined to keep seeing how far you can go before we decide that "even if no one incident warrants a block, the accumulation of incidents does", as I suggested at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents was likely to happen sooner or later? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@User:JamesBWatson
oh sorry sorry I thought thay you told me to remove only the ranking of airports!
I did not understand ... and therefore the ranking of airports should be removed?
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 16:03, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ditelo in italiano?

[edit]

Ciao, Zurich00swiss, sono Shirt58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Parlo - ma, solo un pochettino - italiano.
Maybe, if you wrote in Italian about what you want, we could understand it better.
There are many English language Wilipedia editors who speak Italian, and can help you.
Pietro in Australia pseudonimo --Shirt58 (talk) 11:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Shirt58
Oh finalmente altrimenti ci sto 5 ore a scrivere un messaggio che poi è anche sbagliato, grazie del tuo intervento!
allora io volevo dire che, si avrò pure fatto un errore ma un blocco mi pare eccessivo per questa cosa che ho fatto!
Poi volevo sapere perché tutto il mio profilo è stato cancellato e non solo la sezione che riguarda la discussione?!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 11:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coastal Carolina Regional Airport, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jones and Carteret. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok...it's done!--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 20:51, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Section heading

[edit]

Most of the content of the section of this page headed "Archiving" has nothing to do with archiving, so putting it under that heading is misleading. I suggest dividing it into two different sections, by posting another heading below my original post, which is the only one which actually refers to archiving. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Could you explain why you claim this photo is your own work? I believe it is actually from an Air New Zealand press release. RichardOSmith (talk) 16:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:RichardOSmith
Sorry, I posted this photo 3 weeks ago and when I posted it I noticed that the photo had a violation of copyright!
Now I've tried to delays this but i don't know exactly how to do that!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 18:24, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
When you upload an image you first see this clear explanation. As part of the upload procedure you are shown a preview of the image and have to affirm that it is your own work. Despite this, you didn't realise that it wasn't yours until after you completed the upload? I guess you must have a pile of similar photos of airborne aircraft taken from above that you did take yourself, and muddled it up with one of those. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:52, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Zurich00swiss, when you uploaded the photograph, you claimed that it was your own work. You must have known that it wasn't. Since this was on Wikimedia commons, not the English language Wikipedia, it is outside our jurisdiction. However, things like this are not going to help you to gain the trust that you need if you are to continue to edit on Wikipedia. Also, if it turns out that you have ever linked that photograph to any Wikipedia page, then it does become a copyright infringement within the jurisdiction of English Wikipedia. You need to realise that Wikipedia is an adult project. That does not mean that teenagers can't edit here, on the contrary some excellent editors are teenagers, but they are excellent editors only because they approach Wikipedia in an adult way: teenage editors who treat it as just another web site where you can play around and post any old stuff for fun, and never mind about taking anything seriously, don't become good editors. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and editors who make false claims about copyright are generally warned to stop doing so, and if they don't they are shown the door. It is really unfortunate that just recently a number of things have come to light which have cast doubt on your editing. I unblocked you because I thought you should be given a chance to prove you could be good editor, and I really do want you to succeed. However, it may be that the best thing will be for you to take a break from Wikipedia for a couple of years or so, and come back when you are more mature. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

barnstars

[edit]

Per your request an ANI I've added the barnstar to your user page; sorry I can't find the second one. Do listen the advice you received their regarding blog like activities. NE Ent 12:20, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:NE Ent
Ok, Thanks...
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 12:48, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

[edit]

Just wanted to say I love your photos at Pisa Airport. :) Keep up the good work. Coco Chen (talk) 19:57, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:CocoaPuff310
Thank you very much ;)
I saw that we have the same passion, the same interest and also the same age!
I like you I would to begin a pilot, I would to begin a pilot with of SWISS.
If you want we can talk of aviation about aviation with WhatsApp or with Facebook?!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 09:11, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, we can certainly talk on Facebook. Here's a link to my account. :) Cocoanut (talk) 19:09, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zürich Airport

[edit]
  1. In fact I have only removed non-essential facts from that section about The Circle. That info is relevant in an article about the building but not for an article about an airport.
  2. The promo was the excessive use of maps to show where headquarters were located and how to get there (in one case in three languages). I have left the sources that gave the address, I removed the rest. All companies are still there.

Please, read before shouting. The Banner talk 18:35, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner:
Oh, but in this way you can't do this "deletion" only in ZRH, because in other airports like LHR, yes, there are a lot of promo information but obviously after that you delate it you watch ZRH deleting a lot of information that they have to remain in an enciclopedia!
The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 20:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST. I do not see everything. The Banner talk 20:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Air

[edit]

Zurich00swiss, your reference says nothing, regarding a potential direct route IAS-FLR, starting 30 October. All direct flights announced to be operated by BMS from IAS are already mentioned, on Wikipedia involved articles. Please, feel free to check the flight timetable, on the Iasi Airport's official website (http://www.aeroport.ro/aer/orar/Orar%2025%20oct%20-%2031%20dec%202015.pdf). Thanks, (Rgvis (talk) 13:00, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Rgvis
Oh, sorry I made a mistake, the flight make a stop in OTP but I thought that the flight was without stops!--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 15:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blue Panorama destinations

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Blue Panorama destinations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:NOT a service directory & non-notable

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sjö (talk) 13:23, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on harassment of a good-faith new editor

[edit]

This edit is totally unacceptable, for several reasons.

  1. Posting two warnings at different levels together like that is either an attempt to intimidate the editor in question, an attempt to give other editors the misleading impression that the editor has received separate warnings for separate pieces of vandalism, or both.
  2. There is no reasonable way of interpreting Mario's editing as "vandalism". It is clearly good-faith editing, intended to be constructive.
  3. Posting a level four warning to a new editor, with only one earlier warning, is justifiable only in the case of seriously unacceptable problems, such as grossly offensive vandalism or libel. Mario's editing does not come anywhere remotely near to qualifying.

In view of the dubious nature of your editing history, if I ever see you treating a good-faith new editor in a similar way again, it is quite likely that I will block you without further warning.

You may like to remove the inappropriate message you posted. You may even like to apologise to him for it. You may like to post a helpful message to Mario, explaining politely why you disagree with his editing. Or you may not: it's up to you. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @User:JamesBWatson
    No, that's incredible, if I had done this vandalism act obviously I would be blocking, but since I tried to fix the page of Olbia's Airport after for me a big vandalism act on the page I don't find reason to defend Mario because I risked the block for my favorite aircraft and now you defend Mario when he destroyed a page on Wikipedia?!--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 11:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If what you say is true, then you need to explain more clearly why. You say that Mario "destroyed" the article, but you give no indication at all how or why that was so. If you can tell me clearly what was wrong with Mario's editing then naturally I will reconsider the matter, but so far you have not explained what you think was wrong with his editing. If it was vandalism, then please do say why it was, as it is not obviously vandalism to an outsider, without the amount of background knowledge of the subject that you have. From what I can see, it could easily be that the reason you complain about Mario's editing is simply that you don't like it, and if there is a more substantial reason then it is necessary to say what that reason is. (Also, even if it was vandalism, that does not justify sending two warnings at different levels together.)
Incidentally, I found your message to me because I checked back on this page to see if you had answered: your attempt to ping me by putting*@[[User:JamesBWatson]] at the top of the message did not get a notification to me, because a ping works only if you sign your post with ~~~~. If I had not checked back here, I would not have seen your message. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:44, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JamesBWatson:
I write a message on Mario's talk page, I don't post also the message here in my talk page!--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 12:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Military use of LSZH

[edit]

I don't knew if this is important, and worth for the LSZH page. And the problem is to finde references. But If the Swiss Air Frce will have to force an aircraft to land it will be in LSGG or LSZH. But soo far, for this was no need yet. The Swiss Air Force practis this a few times every year by using it's BE1900, King Air or PC-7 as suspect targed. The second thing is that if military air Bases (Sion, Meiringen ,Payerne or Emmen) have to close because of some reason (bad weater, trap landing,..) LSGG or Zurich can become the alternate landing spot... This could mean that two with Amraam , Sidewinder etc armt fighter stand over night at the airport. Unfortunatly the only "ref" i knew is a swiss air force youtubeclip where the diversion to land at LSGG is shown.. and probably some newspaper articles about the damaged wing of the Kingair douring such an trainig on LSZH. FFA P-16 (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hello FFA P-16, excuse my ignorance, I don't understand where you wanted to add the source with the news and what it was about.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 12:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar Issues

[edit]

Hi, I think you may want to improve your English. As your edits make no sense. I have cleaned up your edits on HolidayJet and reworded everything. There seemed to be an "s" at the end of each word you added. If you are more fluent in another language, you may want to edit on another Wikipedia. 84.92.163.184 (talk) 09:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

84.92.163.184, my only one error that I made was "AFTER" that you changed in "BEFORE", the other your corrections was because HolidayJet failed and you changed the verbs from present to past.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 16:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but you need to improve English. Or you will never get additional user rights, and please do not put random warnings are people's talk pages. Like you did on my talk page. I have reported your actions to an administrator, the section above also shows that this is not the first time you have done this. 84.92.163.184 (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
84.92.163.184
1) you accused me of errors in HolidayJet's page when I didn't made errors.
2) for many times, you reverted my friend's true edit in the WP:AIRPORT's page and for this I sent you the "WARNING" message.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 16:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was restoring previous content, neither edits needed a source. WikiProjects are meant to help people, if ones edit is not helpful. It is ok to be reverted, it was a good faith edit, but I don't agree with it. Now we are trying to talk it out calmly. We're not edit warring. 84.92.163.184 (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A strange message

[edit]

Zurich00swiss, I am bewildered by the message you posted at User talk:84.92.163.184, in which you wrote "Please do not remove content without any reliable source". At first, I though it must be an editing slip. a mistake? "Please do not add content without any reliable source" would make sense, as would "Please do not remove content with a reliable source", but removing content which has no reliable source is exactly what Wikipedia policy encourages. However, reading your message again, I decided it seemed more likely that you meant something like "Please don't remove content which I have added because I failed to provide a reliable source: instead, you should do the work that I failed to do by searching for sources and providing them"? If so, then you are totally out of line with Wikipedia policy, as the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, as specified in the policy on verifiability. Indeed, if you add content you must have a reliable source, otherwise you shouldn't be adding it, so it is easy for you to provide the source; on the other hand, there is no reason to suppose that anyone else will know where to find a source. Also, if you did mean something like that, you may be showing signs of ownership mentality with respect to your contributions.

On another point, can you please say which edits by the IP editor you had in mind? I have looked at the recent edits from that IP address, and I can't see any edit that seems to relate to your message. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 17:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson:, Sorry for the confusion that I caused, I've translated a sentence from Italian and the meaning in English is a little different. I didn't mean that I added unsurced content, if is so, it will be riddicolous. with my mesagge on his/her talk page, I mean that this "IP address" has removed content without citing reliable souces.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 19:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
But that makes no sense at all. You don't need sources in order to remove content: on the contrary, if there are no sources then you should remove the content. It is when you add content that you need to provide sources. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JamesBWatson: Here is the edit Zurich00swiss was talking about - [2] 84.92.163.184 (talk) 15:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tag-team edit-warring, and other issues

[edit]

This is a message about an incident concerning Wjkxy and Zurich00swiss. To save time and trouble, I am writing one message and copying it to both of you, together with an additional piece which I am posting only to Zurich00swiss.

I have just been looking at the editing history of Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports). Previously, I had been contacted, and had commented on the particular aspects of the case which were brought to my attention, but I did not check other aspects. I have now seen more of the history. The two of you were collectively edit-warring, and what is more you were doing so over a point so trivial that I cannot imagine why you cared enough to do so. I am aware that you are two separate people, but your editing history makes it clear that you collaborate, and for one of you to move in and support the other in a situation of this kind amounts to edit-warring by way of meat-puppetry. You will no doubt remember that I lifted a block for sockpuppetry on Wjkxy, but if you continue to edit in ways that appear to amount to meat-puppetry, then the block may be re-imposed. Also, any more edit-warring is likely to lead to being blocked, whether done alone or as a tag-team, and please don't make the common mistake of thinking that you can get away with edit-warring as long as you carefully avoid crossing the so-called "three-revert rule". I also unblocked Zurich00swiss, but he continues to edit with numerous little problems, and if things continue in the same way, it will be only a matter of time before all the little problems add up to enough to lead to the block being restored, even if there is no one big thing. In September, at ANI I wrote "if more incidents add up then there may come a day when either I or some other administrator will decide that, even if no one incident warrants a block, the accumulation of incidents does", and more than once since then I have reminded you on this talk page of that. There is a limit to the number of times I will warn the same editor without deciding that enough is enough. When I unblocked you, I said "I am willing to give you another chance, on the understanding that you will avoid all the problems that led to your being blocked". I am by no means convinced that you have avoided all those problems. I am therefore likely to block you without further warning the next time I see disruptive editing from you. Editing which would be regarded as disruptive includes, but is not limited to: edit-warring, posting inappropriate warnings or threats to new or unregistered editors, attempting to intimidate other editors, showing ownership attitudes towards article content, using Wikipedia for playing, and showing a battleground approach to editors with whom you disagree. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson:
Hello, I'm and Wjkxy are friends but I think that on Wikipedia we didn't edit the same things or i think that he don't help me and I don't help him when there is a discussion that I'm/he's not interest.
When I saw that the same anonymous IP, first accused me in HolidayJet's page and after he/she made a War edit.
I think that I made a little mistake, because, yes, I put a wrong message in the anonymous page, but I'm not the only one because also the ANI posted in my talk page a message accused me about English errors in HolidayJet's page that I never made (and I make a lot of English grammar errors) but not in that case.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 12:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost exit poll

[edit]

Dear Wikipedian, you recently voted in the ArbCom election. Your username, along with around 155 other usernames of your fellow Wikipedians, was randomly selected from the 2000+ Wikipedians who voted this year, with the help of one of the election-commissioners. If you are willing, could you please participate (at your option either on-wiki via userspace or off-wiki via email) in an exit poll, and answer some questions about how you decided amongst the ArbCom candidates?

  If you decide to participate in this exit poll, the statistical results will be published in the Signpost, an online newspaper with over 1000 Wikipedians among the readership. There are about twelve questions, which have alphanumerical answers; it should take you a few minutes to complete the exit poll questionnaire, and will help improve Wikipedia by giving future candidates information about what you think is important. This is only an unofficial survey, and will have no impact on your actual vote during this election, nor in any future election.

  All questions are individually optional, and this entire exit poll itself is also entirely optional, though if you choose not to participate, I would appreciate a brief reply indicating why you decided not to take part (see Question Zero). Thanks for being a Wikipedian

The questionnaire

[edit]

Dear Wikipedian, please fill out these questions -- at your option via usertalk or via email, see Detailed Instructions at the end of the twelve questions -- by putting the appropriate answer in the blanks provided. If you decide not to answer a question (all questions are optional), please put the reason down: "undecided" / "private information" / "prefer not to answer" / "question is not well-posed" / "other: please specify". Although the Signpost cannot guarantee that complex answers can be processed for publication, it will help us improve future exit polls, if you give us comments about why you could not answer specific questions.

quick and easy exit poll , estimated time required: 4 minutes
  • Q#0. Will you be responding to the questions in this exit poll? Why or why not?
  • Your Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#1. Arbs must have at least 0k / 2k / 4k / 8k / 16k / 32k+ edits to Wikipedia.
  • Your Numeric Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#2. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years editing Wikipedia.
  • Your Numeric Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#3. Arbs...
A: should not be an admin
B: should preferably not be an admin
C: can be but need not be an admin
D: should preferably be an admin
E: must be or have been an admin
F: must currently be an admin
  • Your Single-Letter Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#4. Arbs must have at least 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7+ years of experience as an admin.
  • Your Numeric Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Your List-Of-Usernames You Supported:
  • Your Comments:
  • The Quick&Easy End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.
  • Your Wikipedia Username:
  • General Comments:
the extended exit poll, estimated time required: depends
  • Your List-Of-Usernames You Opposed:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#7. Are there any Wikipedians you would like to see run for ArbCom, in the December 2016 election, twelve months from now? Who?
  • Your List-Of-Usernames As Potential Future Candidates:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#8. Why did you vote in the 2015 ArbCom elections? In particular, how did you learn about the election, and what motivated you to participate this year?
  • Your Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#9. For potential arbs, good indicators of the right kind of contributions outside noticeboard activity, would be:
A: discussions on the talkpages of articles which ARE subject to ArbCom sanctions
B: discussions on the talkpages of articles NOT subject to ArbCom restrictions
C: sending talkpage notifications e.g. with Twinkle, sticking to formal language
D: sending talkpage notifications manually, and explaining with informal English
E: working on policies/guidelines
F: working on essays/helpdocs
G: working on GA/FA/DYK/similar content
H: working on copyedits/infoboxes/pictures/similar content
I: working on categorization e.g. with HotCat
J: working on autofixes e.g. with AWB or REFILL
K: working with other Wikipedians via wikiprojects e.g. with MILHIST
L: working with other Wikipedians via IRC e.g. with #wikipedia-en-help connect or informally
M: working with other Wikipedians via email e.g. with UTRS or informally
N: working with other Wikipedians in person e.g. at edit-a-thons / Wikipedian-in-residence / Wikimania / etc
O: other types of contribution, please specify in your comments
Please specify a comma-separated list of the types of contributions you see as positive indicators for arb-candidates to have.
  • Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#10. Arbs who make many well-informed comments at these noticeboards (please specify which!) have the right kind of background, or experience, for ArbCom.
Options: A: AE, B: arbCases, C: LTA, D: OTRS, E: AN,
continued: F: OS/REVDEL, G: CU/SPI, H: AN/I, I: pageprot, J: NAC,
continued: K: RfC, L: RM, M: DRN, N: EA, O: 3o,
continued: P: NPOVN, Q: BLPN, R: RSN, S: NORN, T: FTN,
continued: U: teahouse, V: helpdesk, W: AfC, X: NPP, Y: AfD,
continued: 1: UAA, 2: COIN, 3: antiSpam, 4: AIV, 5: 3RR,
continued: 6: CCI, 7: NFCC, 8: abusefilter, 9: BAG, 0: VPT,
continued: Z: Other_noticeboard_not_listed_here_please_wikilink_your_answer
Please specify a comma-separated list of the noticeboards you see as important background-experience for arb-candidates to have.
  • Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#11. Arbs who make many comments at these noticeboards (please specify!) have the wrong kind of temperament, or personality, for ArbCom.
Options: (same as previous question -- please see above)
Please specify a comma-separated list of the noticeboards you see as worrisome personality-indicators for arb-candidates to have.
  • Your List-Of-Letters Answer:
  • Your Comments:
  • Q#12. Anything else we ought to know?
  • Your Custom-Designed Question(s):
  • Your Custom-Designed Answer(s):
  • The Extended-Answers End. Thank you for your answers. Please sign with your Wikipedia username here, especially important if you are emailing your answers, so we can avoid double-counting and similar confusion.
  • Your Wikipedia Username:
  • General Comments:

Detailed Instructions: you are welcome to answer these questions via usertalk (easiest), or via email (for a modicum of privacy).

how to submit your answers , estimated time required: 2 minutes
  • If you wish to answer via usertalk, go ahead and fill in the blanks by editing this subsection. Once you have completed the usertalk-based exit poll answers, click here to notify the Signpost copy-editor, leave a short usertalk note, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published.
  • If you wish to answer via email, create a new email to the Signpost column-editor by clicking Special:EmailUser/GamerPro64, and then paste the *plaintext* of the questions therein. Once you have completed the email-based exit poll answers, click here to notify the Signpost column-editor, leave a short usertalk note specifying the *time* you sent the email, and click save. The point of leaving the usertalk note, is to make sure your answers are processed and published (not stuck in the spam-folder).

Processing of responses will be performed in batches of ten, prior to publication in the Signpost. GamerPro64 will be processing the email-based answers, and will strive to maintain the privacy of your answers (as well as your email address and the associated IP address typically found in the email-headers), though of course as a volunteer effort, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will have a system free from computer virii, we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will resist hypothetical bribes offered by the KGB/NSA/MI6 to reveal your secrets, and we cannot legally guarantee that GamerPro64 will make no mistakes. If you choose to answer on-wiki, your answers will be visible to other Wikipedians. If you choose to answer via email, your answers will be sent unencrypted over the internet, and we will do our best to protect your privacy, but unencrypted email is inherently an improper mechanism for doing so. Sorry!  :-)

We do promise to try hard, not to make any mistakes, in the processing and presentation of your answers. If you have any questions or concerns, you may contact column-editor GamerPro64, copy-editor 75.108.94.227, or copy-editor Ryk72. Thanks for reading, and thanks for helping Wikipedia. Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 14:30, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roland Garros Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Athens Airport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ops, now it's OK.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 22:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Airline Fleet

[edit]

I noticed that you are updating some fleet lists to December 2015 using ch-aviation, just to note that you need to go back and change the accessdate in the cite web template to reflect when you looked at the website as in most cases you have changed they dont match, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 13:36, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry!--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 20:57, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pisa meeting

[edit]

Hi. I've just seen only know that you proposed a meeting in Pisa. Unfortunately, we are focusing for Tuscany on Florence now. More details here

Any feedback so far? maybe you can just start in the morning in Pisa and than take a train to Florence?

I live close to Pisa but I will be in Florence.--Alexmar983 (talk) 23:34, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexmar983, I think that I close my event in Pisa because there aren't enough the number of people that would participate.
Thanks, I'll let you know later if I will partecipate.
How many people are there in your event?--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 18:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
50 places, at leat 6 users as a team of teachers. It's in the link I gave you, I guess.
There is also a meeting in Livorno on the 14th. --Alexmar983 (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Zurich Airport. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. - DragTails - 12:33, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@DragTails http://www.flightradar24.com/reg/hb-ihz look here https://booking.flyedelweiss.com/WKOnline/AirFareFamiliesFlexibleForward.do and here .--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 14:11, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awards section at Zürich Airport

[edit]

As you deleted a recent edit removing the advertising for an award at Zürich Airport you should read the guidelines regarding advertisements and the content of airport articles - especially as you have a very bad history regarding your editing behaviour here. Award lists are per guidelines not recommended in airport articles as discussed at the Aviation-Portal several times. If it is heavily advertising the source or the source is a private commercial service as both was the case here it is not allowed at all. If the section is restored again, the administration will be informed. Thanks for your understanding.

Hello, but why do you delete advertising only in ZRH when in other airports there are more advertising articles than ZRH!!--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 14:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
And now you are editwarring to get the poor piece back into the article. As you canb see, but probably deliberately ignored, there was a discussion going on about this award. And FFA promised to work on it and get independent sources. What you do is frustrating collaboration, not promoting it. The Banner talk 18:58, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to San Carlos de Bariloche Airport, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jetstreamer Talk 20:52, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry I've made a mistake.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 22:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pau Pyrénées Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pau. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry.--The aviation user. Zurich00swiss (talk) 21:01, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orlando

[edit]

Hello Zurich00swiss,

I have restarted the discussion about the long-going "Orlando airports" issue at WT:Airports. Your thoughts and opinions on the matter would be greatly appreciated! The discussion is here. Regards—172.58.40.42 (talk) 03:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Zurich00swiss. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to ANI

[edit]

Hi, when you edited Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents just now to add a link, you removed som previous posts by other users. Your edits have been reverted to restore those posts, so your link is no longer there, in case you want to re-add it. CHeers, --bonadea contributions talk 11:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Zurich00swiss. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Zurich00swiss. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022

[edit]
The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 251,802 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zurich00swiss&oldid=1136121501"