Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 226060299 by LAAFan (talk)
Requesting semi-protection of Cy Young. (TW)
Line 9: Line 9:
==Current requests for protection==
==Current requests for protection==
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
==== {{la|Cy Young}} ====
'''temporary semi-protection''' ''Vandalism'', Vandals seem to hitting this article hard lately..[[User:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim Fan|<font color="navy" face="Times New Roman">LAA</font>]][[User talk:Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim Fan|<font color="#ff0000" face="Times New Roman">Fan</font>]] 17:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)



===={{la|Chris Barnes (actor)}}====
===={{la|Chris Barnes (actor)}}====

Revision as of 17:28, 16 July 2008

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Vandals seem to hitting this article hard lately..LAAFan 17:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    full protection edit warring. Editor claims WP:COI but isn't able to justify it, and has made several other questionable edits; he's carrying out a grudge from another issue. Cbsite (talk) 14:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Your latest talk page blanking attests to your forum-shopping here. Tan ǀ 39 14:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    When's the last time you had your eyes checked? The request for protection was not in regard to my talk page. Cbsite (talk) 14:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I wasn't talking about your talk page, but thanks for your concern about my eyes. You delete warnings on your talk page to stop with your spamming pages with websites you created (and your username shows). Clear COI. Stop adding spam external links. Tan ǀ 39 14:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    The "spam" is a site about the person in the article: the link belongs in the article regardless of who authored the site. Revert the page and protect it. Cbsite (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection requested. this article was protected for 2.5 days a few days ago in order to stop the vandalism occuring from IP addresses. This period of semi-protection has now expired, but the vandalism is still continuing. Could this article pehaps be semi-protected for longer? Pullshapes (talk) 13:24, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stifle (talk) 13:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    temporary semi-protection , Anon IP (various starting 84.*) insists on adding original research material written in the form of a lecture and/or textbook. References appear to be to their own material. Anon IP is possibly David gv ray (talk · contribs)..MightyWarrior (talk) 11:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stifle (talk) 13:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection requested. There's been a lot of vandalism on the article here lately. For the most part, it's been a big edit war between User:L0b0t and various IPs. The article needs to be protected so that the nonsense will end. Also note that Lemon Bay High School hasn't been the only Charlotte County Public School to be a recent vandal target; this article was also a magnet to vandals until a combination between the use of page protection and abuse reports crashed the vandalism party. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 04:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of 4 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Stifle (talk) 13:37, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    This page was deleted and protected to prevent it from re-creation in August 2007. I'm working on Wikipedia:Suggestions for name disambiguation and have created a dab page for this surname but have had to put it at Adhikari (disambiguation). I would like either to move it to Adhikari (could do a cut and paste as there's no content, just a list, and presumably the complex page history wouldn't allow a simple move to that article title), or to create a redirect there. I hope this is the right place to ask - if not, please be tolerant and advise! Thanks. PamD (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Done - I have moved Adhikari (disambiguation) to Adhikari over the create protection as the new title is more appropriate and the latter page was originally create protected on a seperate issue a long time ago so there should be no problem. Camaron | Chris (talk) 10:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    A sock puppet editing this article was banned in May, then the article itself was protected. As the sock puppet is long gone and there don't seem to be ongoing disputes, I request lifting of protection. --Jenny 09:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Checking to see if protection is necessary. Stifle (talk) 13:45, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Even after several edits, the tone of the article chamges, and the plagarism table keeps coming back. Request for Semi-Protection. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only one or two IPs has recently made inappropriate edits and is manageable without protection, please continue to warn and report to WP:AIV and WP:AN/I as appropriate. Camaron | Chris (talk) 10:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism began as soon as the semi-protection was lifted just recently. It took a few days for the vandals to discover that the semi-protection is gone. This page has always attracted vandals mostly from anonymous IPs which has been especially quite pronounced today on the 15th.--Harout72 (talk) 02:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Seems to have stopped for the time being, no edits since yesterday. Camaron | Chris (talk) 08:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    indefinite semi-protection , Due to this article being a "high school" wikipedia article, many high schoolers try to edit and place their name in areas such as "notable students/alumni" and many other areas. This article has seen an edit in which was not modest and might of shocked users and viewers who view this page to gain a knowledge about this school. It would be greatly accepted and would save time and effort into patrolling this article for vandalism. .Your1727 (talk) 05:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    The fact that the article is about a high school does not automatically make it eligible for indef semi-protection; we have many other school articles with the same problem, but we also see many constructive edits on those articles that come from IPs. I'm not an admin, so I'm not going to reject this, but I think that this request needs to be rejected since it doesn't appear that there has been enough recent vandalism to warrent protection. GO-PCHS-NJROTC (Messages) 05:47, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. GO-PCHS-NJROTC is correct. PeterSymonds (talk) 06:38, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    semi-protect. Moderate to high vandalism this month so far, particularly this past week. Users unable to revert everything in a timely fashion. Abog (talk) 04:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of two weeks. Tiptoety talk 04:05, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:12.4.224.162 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    temporary full protection User talk of blocked user, Blocked IP user is using this page for vandalism, bogus unblock requests..Vianello (talk) 03:40, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for the duration of the block. Tiptoety talk 03:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    temporary move-protection , user keeps moving without consensus and removes warnings.1362talk 03:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked., and 1362 I would advise you to not continue engaging in the move war anymore otherwise you will be blocked too. Please take it to the talk page. Tiptoety talk 03:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    User talk:172.162.116.254 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    temporary semi-protection User talk of blocked user, User is blocked for 20 hours or so.E Wing (talk) 02:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for the duration of the block. Tiptoety talk 02:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism by IPs that places him in Galatasaray without any reliable source. --> Halmstad, Talk to me 23:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. —EncMstr (talk) 02:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Full protection Edit warring between User:Sehend1 and three IPs. The dispute is mainly over the ethnicity groups of the city and demographic of the city of Urmia.--Larno Man (talk) 23:32, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected Ryan Postlethwaite 02:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    temporary full protection Vandalism, main page article, there has been constant vandalism. Protect at least for today.AutoGyro (talk) 00:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Keilana|Parlez ici 01:01, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    User talk:156.34.129.238 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    temporary semi-protection User talk of blocked user, Blocked IP using his talk page for personal attacks..Onorem♠Dil 22:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for 5 days--JForget 22:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    full move protection Grawp. Cunard (talk) 22:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined The page was redirected rather than moved, so semi-protection should prevent that happening for a while. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 22:08, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    Full protection Edit warring and image deletion related to misinterpretation of Fair use policy (this is only one example, and is not meant to implicate any particular editor).Cbsite (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Steven Walling (talk) formerly VanTucky 19:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Anyone else? Cbsite (talk) 20:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, This page is repeatedly being vandalized from different IP.NAHID 19:30, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Steven Walling (talk) formerly VanTucky 19:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    semi protection a banned user on a dynamic IP is vandalizing my user and talk page. AniMate 18:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. I have not put an expiry time, please place a request at WP:RFPU if you want the page unprotected. Camaron | Chris (talk) 18:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Heh, I was just about to answer this. I protected the talk page for three days. Acalamari 18:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks to both of you. AniMate 18:54, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks Acalamari, I was just looking at the talk page and noticed you had already done it, a short user talk page protection also does look appropriate. You're welcome AniMate. Camaron | Chris (talk) 18:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=226060520"