Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎SbX Green Line: new section
→‎SbX Green Line: new section
Line 573: Line 573:
*{{revisions|Page name goes here}}
*{{revisions|Page name goes here}}
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -[[User:Snoopyloopy|Snoopyloopy]] ([[User talk:Snoopyloopy|talk]]) 05:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -[[User:Snoopyloopy|Snoopyloopy]] ([[User talk:Snoopyloopy|talk]]) 05:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

== SbX Green Line ==

*{{revisions|SbX Green Line}}
The sbX Green Line needs a page separate from the page entitled [[San Bernardino Express]] because the Green Line is a specific route of an entire BRT system in development by [[Omnitrans]]. The information on the San Bernardino Express should be amended to be a more general overview of the system. Information about the lines and network and the differences are already included on the websites that are/were cited on both the (now deleted) Green Line page as well as the San Bernardino Express page. -[[User:Snoopyloopy|Snoopyloopy]] ([[User talk:Snoopyloopy|talk]]) 05:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:58, 2 May 2014


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Reality GameMasters

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nobo71-Wikipedia.org 01:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC) I will create this article, please let my create the page and then you can think about deleting it.

It's apart of many people including, Rob Cesternino, Ian Terry, and Some of the other contestants.

  • It looks like it's still in the mainspace and will likely be speedied, but requesting this to be re-created before it's actually deleted is a little premature. Offhand I can't find anything to really justify it being on here, as I can only find one source to assert notability. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • In other words, I honestly don't think that this should be re-created even after it's speedied because it's highly unlikely to ever pass notability guidelines given that it aired in June 2013 and never received more than a passing mention here and there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:57, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aplos Software

I, CaliAggie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CaliAggie (talk) 04:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SED-ML

I, Dagwa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dagwa (talk) 11:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I still wish to publish the article and would like to try going through publication process again -Dagwa (talk) 11:55, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agosto Machado (Performer, Artist, Activist)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Omaether (talk) 13:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC) I have also listed this in the contesting of the deletion. In brief, Agosto is a real person. He has been an important part of downtown theater and gay history in New York. The fact that he has little presence on the web is exactly why he has requested me to make a Wiki page about him. Please allow this article to live. Honestly I do not see any valid and just reason why you would delete it. We are still in the process of adding links and references.[reply]

As per your request I have put in the text "Coming Soon". Please review the earlier drafts. I do not see how this content violates any of the rules you cited. thanks again John Hoge, NYC

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion a7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Try WP:AFC instead. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:15, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First attorney consultants, ltd.

I edited the article to explain the significance of First Attorney Consultants, Ltd. -Joefacl (talk) 15:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
I suggest you take Smalljim's advice in answer to your query on his talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Social Venture Partners

I, Benignfun, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Benignfun (talk) 19:08, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Social Venture Partners now has a dedicated staff for digital media that will respond to the wikipedia standards and guidelines to ensure the article library about SVP and it's actions/programs/history etc comply and are a meaningful contribution to the wikipedia corpus.

Um... does this "dedicated staff" communicate through the "Benignfun" account, or some other way? ~Amatulić (talk) 19:20, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Giant Woman

The article was successfully WP:G7'd from a request I made out of spite that I didn't think the article met the general notability criteria well enough, partly influenced by some personal stuff. I regret making such a poor judgment, and would like it restored so that it may be tested by the community in time, instead of airing my dirty laundry. -Whisternefet (t · c) 23:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I remember deleting that one, thinking it was a pretty good article and wondering why you'd want to delete it after what appeared to be a lot of work. I'm glad you changed your mind. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Enid Robbie

I, Angusrobbie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Angusrobbie (talk) 01:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:19, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nariman Mehta

Would like to rewrite article showing notability in the opening paragraph, followed by subheadings, "early life and education" and "career" with 2 additional subheadings under "career" for "published research" and "patents". Please advise. Thank you. --Beach4444 (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)beach4444--Beach4444 (talk) 03:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Beach4444/Nariman Mehta (draft).
The page User:Beach4444/Nariman Mehta already existed, so I didn't move it there.
There's a "Submit" button in the box at the top of the draft article to submit it when you think it's ready, but you will need an administrator to override the create protection to move the article back to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fortune_softtech_Milan

It is not an priomotional conetnt and then click the "Save page" button below -FsitDzyn (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It does not appear to meet our guidelines for notability and based with the content and the username I do believe it is promotional in nature and have nominated it for deletion. Please read WP:CORPDEPTH Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to being promotional, it was also deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7, which disqualifies the article for restoration by request here. For that reason as well as promotion, Not done. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Judicaël Perroy (2nd request)

Here is an article from Wikipedia that I used for guidance: Thomas Viloteau. I do not see how my article is any different or any less referenced. In fact Viloteau was one of Perroy's students -06:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Zinjanous (talk)

References are not the problem. The article was promotional in nature. There are a couple of points to realize here:
I suggest you contact the deleting administrators shown in the deletion log of the page to ask for reconsideration or userfying to your own user space to allow you to continue improving the article. ~Amatulić (talk) 07:11, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cardiff Council

I cannot see why the updated information can not be displayed please at it reflects facts rather than opinions. Please can I have a response a.s.a.p. Many thanks, Helen - comms2014 -

I have tried to post updated information on the Cardiff Council page for the past couple of days.

the informaiton included is purely factual informaiton about the new arrnagements at the organisaiton and do not have or hold personal viewpoints, I therefore request that my edits which have been saved yet again this afternoon are uploaded to the page a.s.a.p? The organisation official name has recently changed to City of Cardiff Council following the election of a new Leader, again, this is a fact and needs to be reflected in the Wikipedia informaiton in terms of the title.

I look forward to hearing from you.

thanks,

Not done because there is nothing to do. This page is for requesting undeletion of deleted articles. The Cardiff Council article is not deleted, and isn't even proposed to be deleted.
Because you are associated with this organization, your best approach is to propose any substantive changes on the article's talk page, in accordance with our conflict of interest guideline found at WP:COI. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shopatron

this page explains our company's history and mission. We are more than happy for someone to edit or revise, but we have gotten numerous emails from people who were searching for information about us on Wikipedia and unable to find anything -Bluemeringue1 (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. G11s also cannot be overturned here, as such pages would need a fundamental rewrite to remove all the promotional writing. Please see WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Notability, and ignore those emails from here on out. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is deleted now (for the third time) and salted to prevent re-creation.
A cornerstone policy here is that Wikipedia is not a publicity medium. Wikipedia does not exist for your company's convenience or marketing goals. If you want to write an article about your company, please submit it through Wikipedia:Articles for creation in accordance with our conflict of interest guideline, because you clearly have a conflict of interest. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Erbsmann Prize

Would like to reactive previous draft of the page - The Erbsmann prize is a major recognition within the medical imaging community, that we believe, merits having further information shared on a wikipedia page ( see links on google scholar on high impact scientific publications related to the IPMI meetings, from which the Erbsmann prize is awarded: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?start=40&q=information+processing+medical+imaging&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 )

The draft page was not polished due to time constraint - now is a good time to finalize a first version — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herve.lombaert (talk • contribs) 20:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • The problem is that there was nothing there to actually re-create. I restored it, then promptly noticed that it was a blank entry. There wasn't anything there to create or give back to you other than a template that says we can't accept blank submissions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Global Thinkers Forum

This was requested by Starstruck2011 (talk · contribs), but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:30, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly

I, Renee00124, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Renee00124 (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

J. Mitchell aka Melodiousfly

undeletion -Renee00124 (talk) 04:31, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Janan Sorelo Levy

I, 5.22.130.135, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 5.22.130.135 (talk) 08:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Janan Sorelo Levy

I kindly ask an undeletion of this page thank you Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -5.22.130.135 (talk) 08:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

El Mednifico Journal

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... its just a company profile regarding something new in the field of science which is happening in a third world country like Pakistan. By deleting this page you will be hindering the progress of a nation. Kindly provide with the improvements to be made in order to undelete this page -Aw.usmani.duhs (talk) 11:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request.. Note however, notability is key, and if it's not encyclopedic YET, it more certainly does not "hinder the progress of a nation" - shame on you for suggesting such the panda ₯’ 13:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:MOHHANBABU

I want to delete an image from wikipedia commons and searched how to do it in google and found a code and as i am a fresher to wikipedia, i unknowingly kept that code in user edit page and found that my page was deleted.So I need your help in getting my page back and delete that particular image deleted from commons.Thank you. -MOHHANBABU (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: Having read the contents of the deleted page, I'm not sure exactly what "code" you're looking for. Much of that page was wholly unacceptable as a userpage. Please be more specific about what elements from that page you need - nothing on that page had anything to do with Wikimedia Commons (and the English Wikipedia has no jurisdiction there) the panda ₯’ 13:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is my page not under rules of wikipedia? Can you give me more clarity about what is the mistake of me having my page in that way and Can you please say whether you could bring back that page or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MOHHANBABU (talk • contribs) 14:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done We allow wide latitude to what Wikipedia editors can do with their user pages, but so far you have very few contributions to the encyclopedia other than writing extensively about yourself. I also have concerns about the large number of family names you added to the infobox, because I'm fairly sure you didn't ask all of them if you could publicize their identities on a website. I can send you the deleted text via email if you wish, but you will have to re-create your user page as per our guidelines. Please pay close attention to the What may I not have in my user pages? section. WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK is also applicable here. Finally, I deleted your request for deletion (the MfD you created) since that was the wrong venue to request undeletion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

magician ganesh

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Darvesh.dinesh (talk) 13:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Dougweller (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diller Street Journal

This organization exists as the newspaper of the North Shore Country Day School. As it is still reorganizing itself, information is low right now, but as the process moves along, more will be added. -Dallascowboysftw (talk) 14:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Wikipedia is not here to advertise your paper, and notability isn't inheritable. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Mendes

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 24.18.92.82 (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Please read WP:COI and WP:AUTO, if it applies to you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arahmaiani

Recreating article and want to see/edit this old version. -gobonobo + c 20:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done If you're going to re-create it go ahead, the extent of the content was Arahmaiani was born in 1961 in Bandung, Indonesia is also known as "Iani" or "Yani". A graduate of Bandung Institute of Technology and internationally active installation and performance artist. in two revisions. That's it. Make sure you review WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO before too. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pawanwagle

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pawanwagle (talk) 01:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion U5. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a social networking site, and users who intend to use Wikipedia solely for this purpose are generally blocked as not being here to work on an encyclopedia. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I could tell you that I would restore it if you somehow proved that you are here to contribute to the encyclopedia, but in any case it was a single paragraph that could have been lifted from your CV. I'm sure once you become a regular contributor you'll want to populate your userpage with more appropriate stuff. Please read the links Jeremy provided above - Wikipedia accounts are not personal web pages. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Falaco Soliton

I, Aqm2241, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aqm2241 (talk) 04:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/isoglobotriosylceramide

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 143.111.84.118 (talk) 04:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This page is not for reviewing draft articles; it's only for undeleting certain types of articles that were deleted without discussion. Try WP:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Nothing to do here, the article has not been deleted and is awaiting review. I did add a references section. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parfums de Marly

I, Kovinmel, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kovinmel (talk) 08:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Refund/

G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for

creation/Nicolas Mouawad}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avram44 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I notice that the page has been previously deleted for copyright violations, so I'll need to check to see if the second copy of the page also contained copyright violations. If it did, then I will not be able to un-delete the page for you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done and will not be done Unfortunately the page is copyvio from the official website and this makes up the majority of the page. I can't really bring the page back because of this, but you can still create a new entry at this location. Please be aware that we cannot accept WP:COPYVIO for various reasons, one being that it is legally copyrighted to the manufacturer but also because in most cases such as this one, the copyvio is so promotional that it cannot be used in the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:37, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jaime Chavez

Prodded article, has been starting this season for Atlanta Silverbacks, for example [1] -Nfitz (talk) 12:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Nfitz (talk) 12:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crankin Frank

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Fviacono (talk) 14:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm going to act as a AFC reviewer here and decline the submission (for the third time) because the subject of the article clearly does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion. Narratives about how someone won tickets to a concert or has blogged about music is not significant coverage. Also please read WP:AUTO if it applies here to you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shantanu maheshwari

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 182.68.58.47 (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:39, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List Of Promotional Yu-Gi-Oh! trading cards

As With My List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Cards in my userspace, I Would Like This Article to be in User:titusfox/LOPYGOTC. -TitusFox'Tribs 19:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. You misspelt "cards". —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Procreate

I, CastleGreyskull, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CastleGreyskull (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Both the contents of the page and the history of your account suggest that the purpose of the page is to promote its subject, which is inconsistent with Wikipedia's policies. Also, there is no indication that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. We normally allow a good deal more leeway in an "articles for creation" submission than in other pages, to allow a chance to improve the draft, but when after more than a year no improvement has been made, there is no good reason for allowing Wikipedia to continue to be used as a web host for a page which is unsuitable as an article, especially when the history of the account that created it strongly suggests that the purpose of the account is to use Wikipedia for promotion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neptune Society

I, Pparkk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pparkk (talk) 02:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The page was an unambiguous attempt to use Wikipedia for advertising, and as such could have been speedily deleted immediately after creation. We normally allow a good deal more leeway in "articles for creation" submissions than in other pages, but when an editor has had a few days short of a year in which to improve a draft, and in that time made no attempt whatever to re-write it as a non-promotional page, and when that editor's editing history also suggests that he/she is here for the purpose of promotion, enough is enough. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very harsh assessment under the circumstances, James. My goal was to differentiate a number of companies operating under the same name, Neptune Society, in the same industry. As my article included information about 4 companies named Neptune Society--all competitors--I'm having trouble seeing how my article was seen as promotional. I'm certainly not promoting all 4 competitors in the same article. I don't see why the fact that I have little time to devote to wikipedia contributions should count against me. Pparkk (talk)

Joseph Di Virgilio

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph Di Virgilio==

I, Larrycohen745, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Larrycohen745 (talk) 05:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done This is one of a large number of attempts to use Wikipedia to host a somewhat promotional page about a person who does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. It has been repeatedly created under various titles, by a string of single-purpose accounts, very probably sockpuppets of a blocked editor. You have been attempting to use Wikipedia to host this page at least since 2007, and you have repeatedly had it made clear to you that the page is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please drop the attempt. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mehgan James

It says that the Mehgan James page was deleted because there is reason to believe that she is not a real person. Mehgan James is indeed a real person who's has been on 4 reality tv shows and 2 national commercials. she has a real fan base . this is not fair to her fans. who would like to know and learn information about her -50.200.126.4 (talk) 08:28, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. That is not what an A7 speedy deletion implies, it implies that the article does not make a credible claim as to why the person is notable. Existence does not play a factor into it, and having a fanbase does not make one automatically notable. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:46, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehgan James, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thelakkat Kalathilthodiyil Kesavan Nayar

I, Ahsamkr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ahsamkr (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ahsamkr. The AfC submission for this article was declined on 27 October, 2013 for the reason: "This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." Do you have a plan for how to fix this? Have you located any references that you could add to the article? EdJohnston (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. The article describes the subject as a 'practicing physician and a social personality.' EdJohnston (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Back to the Rock Live

I, Petrafan327, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Petrafan327 (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please go over the notability guidelines for musical recordings before re-submitting. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Zeliangrong Community

I, 117.121.234.131, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.121.234.131 (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Before submitting, please correct: The submission is worded as an essay rather than in an encyclopedic tone, and is completely unsourced. Otherwise it will be rejected. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cork Proctor

I, 190.154.52.243, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 190.154.52.243 (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HFSmas Nutcracker

I, Dvincent88, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dvincent88 (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What Was That or Suddenly Lost Summer

My guess is that the page was deleted for lack of any relevant information or details about the event. However, a rare radio spot for it and a poster for it have been found, allowing the article to be populated with some hard information. It was sponsored by Radio Station KSAN on January 31-February 1, 1976, it was "an acid-drenched flashback to the summer of love, featuring remembrances of those turned on days when all things were possible and little was probable; complete with interviews, un-released music, and horrifying shocks of recongnition." It also featured eastern mysticism and the saying "Turn on, tune in, and drop out!" -50.136.141.191 (talk) 01:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • They're referring to an event held/sponsored by a radio station (see this poster) back in the 70s. I honestly have my doubts about its notability because there is little to nothing out there about it. No true mention in books, highbeam, or even basic hits beyond poster sales. The most I found was a picture of the poster here, but we can't use it as a RS because the event itself isn't mentioned and besides, it's one of those "anyone can edit" sort of sites. At most the event could be mentioned on the radio station's article, although I'd like to have some sort of certainty as to which KSAN it is since there are multiple KSANs and the station numbers don't exactly match up with the ones listed on the poster (95). I'm pretty sure that it's this one, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zopim

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Abhiroopb (talk) 06:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Numeracy

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 81.142.59.121 (talk) 07:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • I thought the name had to clearly and unambiguously identify the account for COI purposes - "John at Yoyodine" is fine, but "EmmaNatNumeracy" not so much. Unless it means "EmmaN at Numeracy"? §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald R. Weeks

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -131.216.14.2 (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC) Hi,[reply]

My page was restored to the old page after I corrected everything. It was set up by a colleague without asking me. I am not sure why the old page is now up and how to contact the person who changed it. Gerald R. Weeks131.216.14.2 (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)4/29/14[reply]

The page is not deleted, and hasn't been deleted, and isn't being proposed for deletion, so there is nothing to restore.
You have a conflict of interest regarding an article about yourself. Read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and refrain from making substantial content changes directly to the article. Propose your changes on the talk page instead. Preface your proposal with the {{request edit}} tag to signal other editors that you are proposing a change. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Muzik

Claire Muzik I don´t have an idea why the page was deleted. Can you please let me know what else should I do to keep the profile online. Thanks so much! Helloween82 (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Y (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Also, this isn't Facebook. We don't have "profiles" here. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shiju_jose

Shiju jose · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] Please don't delete this page as its a self created page about me. i want world to know me also while searching on web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eureka4u (talk • contribs) 17:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Wikipedia is not for telling the world about yourself. Next time, please follow the directions at the top of this page as opposed to linking to another wiki. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done Wikipedia is not the place to write about yourself. Subjects must meet the notability guidelines for inclusion, and the reason the article was deleted makes it ineligible for restoration. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Siterank Targeting

Hi, I've changed the the post removing any reference to a company name - explaining the key principle behind SiteRank targeting only; Think this is worth a place on wikipedia as this is an explanation to a unique targeting algorithm that is used by demand-side platform; Let me know if it is ok or not to mention AdGear as the company is the inventor of this targeting algorithm "Save page" button below -Hholod (talk) 20:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. It's already been deleted three times for being promotional, and that is disruptive, which is why the article cannot be recreated anymore. Please use Wikipedia:Articles for creation for stuff like this, especially when you have a conflict of interest. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please also read WP:42 very carefully before you continue. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brenda Kerr

I, Rugbyleagueorg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rugbyleagueorg (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christ Church, Selly Park

I, Dskjt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dskjt (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:32, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 172.5.213.158 (talk) 02:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). I can't see any deleted content from your IP, so you will have to tell us what it is. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hilda Harris

Ready to make recommended edits to have article ppublished -172.5.213.158 (talk) 02:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Krisana lalai

-Toey ok (talk) 10:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring an article that appears to exist solely to promote the subject. Consider asking the deleting administrator RHaworth to restore or userfy the article. If you are associated with the subject in some way, try Wikipedia:Articles for creation as an alternative way to submit an article. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, consider undeleting AdGear article

Please, consider reviving AdGear article - twice I have worked on this article about AdGear company and both times it was removed - It is quite a bit of work and will do my best to gather both information and relevant sources about the organization. Company is quite unique in its own space of ad technology platforms - for example they are the inventors of unique SiteRank based targeting algorithms for demand-side platforms... That being said I strongly believe they deserve a spot within wikipedia universe. Thank you, Ivan Roubtsov " button below -Hholod (talk) 12:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 do not qualify for restoration by request. You already have Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AdGear, as clearly explained on your talk page. Work on that version and submit it. Do not try to circumvent the AFC process that you yourself started by trying to post the article in main space. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yotta Solutions

Yotta Solutions article shouldn't be deleted. It was talking about an online company for websites producing which also offers internet services and programming. How isn't that important? I believe it's un-fairly deleted. Please review it. -MoAtoum (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Absolutely not. It was properly deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 and thus does not qualify for restoration by request. This is your company, you have failed to read or understand WP:NOTPROMOTION and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (and you clearly have one). You should be using WP:AFC to submit articles instead of trying to put them in main article space directly. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Grid-Enabled Measures

I, Kai.larsen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kai.larsen (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maithili cinema

Viraj Dobriyal (character)

Begging admins to please save the edit as this is not violating any rights. For admins, save the page -AiNaCholbe (talk) 18:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. Repeatedly creating a page will get all titles you've done it under salted to stop you from doing it. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viraj Dobriyal, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Noting to do with any rights, but deleted due to non-notability. When two independent reliable sources write on the topic it can be reconsidered. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Considering the requester re-created the article under a different title to get around the G4 and has now been blocked for socking, it will be snowing in the Bahamas before we restore this article. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:28, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chihiro number(s)

Mathematical content was legitimate, not present at any other location on the wiki, fairly notable, and named improperly -131.212.242.56 (talk) 02:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Online Insurance comparison websites in India

I, Debam25, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Debam25 (talk) 13:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, page restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SoundPimp audio enhancer

I, 80.202.169.16, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 80.202.169.16 (talk) 15:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, page restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scott Ramsey

I, HICOR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HICOR (talk) 21:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St. Mary & St. George Parish

<malformed request fixed--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)>--Julio César Martin Trejo (talk) 22:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Julio. Can you please advise how much of this content (if any) is text taken from the sources you cited? After years of experience with reviewing new articles, this reads to me like content that is composed of quotations, though I don't know that for sure; did you rewrite the material you found in the sources in your own words? Please advise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dead mans cove runners

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Thatusernametaken (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC) The page was deleted as I made a mistake in not preparing it in my sandbox first.[reply]

The Dead Mans Cove is about a group, not a formal club, of mostly men with the main purpose of fundraising and supporting charities. The charities include Oxfam, Kids Under Cover, Royal Children's Hospital ,Cottage By The Sea and RSPCA to name only a few. The group uses the DMC runners tag as a loose identifier of them rather than as their core business. With the charity organizations we support we register for events under the banner of DMC or Dead Mans Cover Runners but have no formal structure. If I could have the page back I will load it into the Sandbox and complete it rather than editing "live" and leaving an erroneous view of the group as a "sporting" club. The anonymity of the members in using nicknames is preserved. I was preparing the section on getting involved and supporting our charity partners when the page was taken down. in hind sight I should of completed the planning, and editing prior to publishing.

Dead mans cove runners

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Thatusernametaken (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC) The page was deleted as I made a mistake in not preparing it in my sandbox first.[reply]

The Dead Mans Cove is about a group, not a formal club, of mostly men with the main purpose of fundraising and supporting charities. The charities include Oxfam, Kids Under Cover, Royal Children's Hospital ,Cottage By The Sea and RSPCA to name only a few. The group uses the DMC runners tag as a loose identifier of them rather than as their core business. With the charity organizations we support we register for events under the banner of DMC or Dead Mans Cover Runners but have no formal structure. If I could have the page back I will load it into the Sandbox and complete it rather than editing "live" and leaving an erroneous view of the group as a "sporting" club. The anonymity of the members in using nicknames is preserved. I was preparing the section on getting involved and supporting our charity partners when the page was taken down. in hind sight I should of completed the planning, and editing prior to publishing.

RE: [[Art Spiegelman}} and my consistent removal from his page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ladybelle Fiske (talk • contribs) 03:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to again ask that I be included in the article on Art Spiegelman, my friend and boyfriend from 1966-1996 or so. His most recent book, Co-Mix, shows, in his "Grain of Sand" comics, going down one of the "I's" in the title (may require a magnifying glass), "I love you, Ladybelle."

Please see my discussion with one of the editors on this matter. There are also many images of Art and myself on Facebook, on my page, some of which can be found by running a Google search for Art Spiegelman and Ladybelle Fiske.

He and I were very close and I was the closest thing he had to a wife till he met Françoise Mouly in 1975. He also did draw some of "MAUS" at Quarry Hill, my home in Vermont, in my little writing cabin in the mountains.

Many friends of ours would be able and willing to provide statements as to my importance to Art. I don't understand why it is so difficult to get my name mentioned. I helped Art and Françoise create "Top Drawer Rubber Stamp Company," and the images were made by friends of ours who lived at Quarry Hill. Laurence Mouly, Françoise's sister, lived with us in Vermont (it is Vermont's oldest commune-- see the Quarry Hill Creative Center page.

Quarry HIll and I were an important part of Art's life. I will soon publish a memoir of my life which mentions the relationship, though by no means is the book only about Art. I consider him a friend and an old lover, famous or not. I too am not unknown in my home state of Vermont. To me, he's just a friend I once knew, not God. Thanks, Ladybelle Fiske (Isabella Fiske McFarlin) Ladybelle Fiske (talk) 03:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SbX Green Line

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Snoopyloopy (talk) 05:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SbX Green Line

The sbX Green Line needs a page separate from the page entitled San Bernardino Express because the Green Line is a specific route of an entire BRT system in development by Omnitrans. The information on the San Bernardino Express should be amended to be a more general overview of the system. Information about the lines and network and the differences are already included on the websites that are/were cited on both the (now deleted) Green Line page as well as the San Bernardino Express page. -Snoopyloopy (talk) 05:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=606731089"