Jump to content

Feminism

Edit links
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Props888 (talk | contribs) at 01:41, 30 March 2011 (→Waves of feminism: "Third-wave feminism is siad" to "Third-wave feminism is said"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

See also: feminist movement and feminism in the United States
"Feminists" redirects here. For other uses, see Feminists (disambiguation).

International Women's Day rally in Dhaka, Bangladesh, organized by the National Women Workers Trade Union Centre on March 8, 2005.
Part of a series on
Feminism
History
Waves
Timelines
Women's suffrage by country
Intersectional variants
Socialist
Multicultural
Other variants
Religious variants
Movements and ideologies
Concepts
Outlooks
Theory
Areas of study
By continent/country
Lists and categories
Lists
Categories
Feminism portal

Feminism is a collection of movements aimed at defining, establishing and defending equal political, economic, and social rights and equal opportunities for women.[1][2][3] Its concepts overlap with those of women's rights. Feminism is mainly focused on women's issues, but because feminism seeks gender equality, some feminists argue that men's liberation is therefore a necessary part of feminism, and that men are also harmed by sexism and gender roles. Feminists—that is, persons practicing feminism—can be persons of either sex.

Feminist theory emerged from these feminist movements[4][5] and includes general theories and theories about the origins of inequality, and, in some cases, about the social construction of sex and gender, in a variety of disciplines. Feminist activists have campaigned for women's rights—such as in contract, property, and voting—while also promoting women's rights to bodily integrity and autonomy and reproductive rights. They have opposed domestic violence, sexual harassment, and sexual assault. In economics, they have advocated for workplace rights, including equal pay and opportunities for careers and to start businesses.

In the West, the movements and theoretical developments were historically led predominantly by middle-class white women from Western Europe and North America, but, since then, more women have proposed additional feminisms.

History

A 1932 Soviet poster for International Women's Day.
Main article: History of feminism
See also: Protofeminist

Feminists and scholars have divided the movement's history into three "waves". The first wave refers mainly to women's suffrage movements of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries (mainly concerned with women's right to vote). The second wave refers to the ideas and actions associated with the women's liberation movement beginning in the 1960s (which campaigned for legal and social equality for women). The third wave refers to a continuation of, and a reaction to, the perceived failures of, second-wave feminism, beginning in the 1990s.[6]

Waves of feminism

The period described as first-wave feminism refers to feminist activity during the nineteenth century and early twentieth century in the United Kingdom and the United States. Originally it focused on the promotion of equal contract and property rights for women and the opposition to chattel marriage and ownership of married women (and their children) by their husbands. However, by the end of the nineteenth century, activism focused primarily on gaining political power, particularly the right of women's suffrage. Yet, feminists such as Voltairine de Cleyre and Margaret Sanger were still active in campaigning for women's sexual, reproductive, and economic rights at this time.[7]

Louise Weiss along with other Parisian suffragettes in 1935. The newspaper headline reads "THE FRENCHWOMAN MUST VOTE."

In Britain the Suffragettes, and possibly more effectively, the Suffragists campaigned for the women's vote. In 1918 the Representation of the People Act 1918 was passed granting the vote to women over the age of 30 who owned houses. In 1928 this was extended to all women over twenty-one.[8] In the United States leaders of this movement included Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Susan B. Anthony, who each campaigned for the abolition of slavery prior to championing women's right to vote and strongly influenced by Quaker thought. Other important leaders include Lucy Stone, Olympia Brown, and Helen Pitts. American first-wave feminism involved a wide range of women, some belonging to conservative Christian groups (such as Frances Willard and the Woman's Christian Temperance Union), others resembling the diversity and radicalism of much of second-wave feminism (such as Matilda Joslyn Gage and the National Woman Suffrage Association). In the United States, first-wave feminism is considered to have ended with the passage of the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (1919), granting women the right to vote in all states.The term first wave, was coined retrospectively after the term second-wave feminism began to be used to describe a newer feminist movement that focused as much on fighting social and cultural inequalities as political inequalities.[7][9][10][11][12]

File:Mystique.jpg
Original paperback cover from Betty Friedan's The Feminine Mystique (1963)

Second-wave feminism refers to a period of feminist activity beginning in the early 1960s and lasting through the late 1980s. The scholar Imelda Whelehan suggests that the second wave was a continuation of the earlier phase of feminism involving the suffragettes in the UK and USA.[13] Second-wave feminism has continued to exist since that time and coexists with what is termed third-wave feminism. The scholar Estelle Freedman compares first and second-wave feminism saying that the first wave focused on rights such as suffrage, whereas the second wave was largely concerned with other issues of equality, such as ending discrimination.[7]

The feminist activist and author Carol Hanisch coined the slogan "The Personal is Political" which became synonymous with the second wave.[14][15] Second-wave feminists saw women's cultural and political inequalities as inextricably linked and encouraged women to understand aspects of their personal lives as deeply politicized and as reflecting sexist power structures.

Third-wave feminism is said to have begun in the early 1990s, arising as a response to perceived failures of the second wave and also as a response to the backlash against initiatives and movements created by the second wave. Third-wave feminism seeks to challenge or avoid what it deems the second wave's essentialist definitions of femininity, which (according to them) over-emphasize the experiences of upper middle-class white women.

A post-structuralist interpretation of gender and sexuality is central to much of the third wave's ideology. Third-wave feminists often focus on "micro-politics" and challenge the second wave's paradigm as to what is, or is not, good for females.[7][16][17][18] The third wave has its origins in the mid-1980s. Feminist leaders rooted in the second wave like Gloria Anzaldua, bell hooks, Chela Sandoval, Cherrie Moraga, Audre Lorde, Maxine Hong Kingston, and many other black feminists, sought to negotiate a space within feminist thought for consideration of race-related subjectivities.[19][17][20]

Third-wave feminism also contains internal debates between difference feminists such as the psychologist Carol Gilligan (who believes that there are important differences between the sexes) and those who believe that there are no inherent differences between the sexes and contend that gender roles are due to social conditioning.[21]

Post-feminism

Main article: Postfeminism

Post-feminism describes a range of viewpoints reacting to feminism. While not being "anti-feminist", post-feminists believe that women have achieved second wave goals while being critical of third wave feminist goals. The term was first used in the 1980s to describe a backlash against second-wave feminism. It is now a label for a wide range of theories that take critical approaches to previous feminist discourses and includes challenges to the second wave's ideas.[22] Other post-feminists say that feminism is no longer relevant to today's society.[23] Amelia Jones has written that the post-feminist texts which emerged in the 1980s and 1990s portrayed second-wave feminism as a monolithic entity and criticized it using generalizations.[24]

Theoretical schools

Main article: Feminist theory

Feminist theory is an extension of feminism into theoretical or philosophical fields. It encompasses work in a variety of disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, economics, women's studies, literary criticism,[25][26] art history,[27] psychoanalysis[28] and philosophy.[29][30] Feminist theory aims to understand gender inequality and focuses on gender politics, power relations, and sexuality. While providing a critique of these social and political relations, much of feminist theory also focuses on the promotion of women's rights and interests. Themes explored in feminist theory include discrimination, stereotyping, objectification (especially sexual objectification), oppression, and patriarchy.[4][5]

The American literary critic and feminist Elaine Showalter describes the phased development of feminist theory. The first she calls "feminist critique", in which the feminist reader examines the ideologies behind literary phenomena. The second Showalter calls "gynocriticism", in which the "woman is producer of textual meaning" including "the psychodynamics of female creativity; linguistics and the problem of a female language; the trajectory of the individual or collective female literary career and literary history". The last phase she calls "gender theory", in which the "ideological inscription and the literary effects of the sex/gender system" are explored".[31] This model has been criticized by the scholar Toril Moi who sees it as an essentialist and deterministic model for female subjectivity and for failing to account for the situation of women outside the West.[32]

Movements and ideologies

Sojourner Truth, a famous black feminist, delivered the speech Ain't I a Woman? arguing for black women's equality in 1851
Main article: Feminist movements and ideologies

Several overlapping movements of feminist ideologies have developed over the years.

Political and economic

Liberal feminism seeks individualistic equality of men and women through political and legal reform without altering the structure of society. Radical feminism considers the male-controlled capitalist hierarchy as the defining feature of women's oppression and the total uprooting and reconstruction of society as necessary[14] Socialist feminism connects oppression of women to exploitation, oppression, and labor. Marxist feminists feel that overcoming class oppression overcomes gender oppression;[33] some socialist feminists disagree.[34] and has branched into such as anti-pornography feminism, opposed by sex-positive feminism. Anarcha-feminists believe that class struggle and anarchy against the state[35] require struggling against patriarchy, which comes from involuntary hierarchy. Separatist feminism does not support heterosexual relationships. Lesbian feminism is thus closely related. Other feminists criticize separatist feminism as sexist.[36]

Conservative feminism is conservative relative to the society in which it resides. Libertarian feminism conceives of people as self-owners and therefore as entitled to freedom from coercive interference.[37] Individualist feminism or ifeminism, opposing so-called gender feminism, draws on anarcho-capitalism.[38]

Ecofeminists see men's control of land as responsible for the oppression of women and destruction of the natural environment, but a criticism is that ecofeminism focuses too much on a mystical connection between women and nature.[39]

Cultural

Cultural feminism attempts to revalidate undervalued "female nature" or "female essence";[40] its critics assert that it has led feminists to retreat from politics to lifestyle.[41]

During much of its history, feminist movements and theoretical developments were led predominantly by middle-class white women from Western Europe and North America.[19][42][43] However, at least since Sojourner Truth's 1851 speech to American feminists, women of other races have proposed alternative feminisms.[42] This trend accelerated in the 1960s with the civil rights movement in the United States and the collapse of European colonialism in Africa, the Caribbean, parts of Latin America, and Southeast Asia. Since that time, women in developing nations and former colonies and who are of colour or various ethnicities or living in poverty have proposed additional feminisms.[43]

Womanism[44][45] emerged after early feminist movements were largely white and middle-class.[19] Black feminism argues that sexism, class oppression, and racism are inextricably bound together.[46][47][48] Chicana feminism focuses on Mexican American, Chicana, and Hispanic women in the United States. Multiracial or "women of colour" feminism is related.[49]

Standpoint feminists argue that feminism should examine how women's experience of inequality relates to that of racism, homophobia, classism, and colonization.[50][42] Postcolonial feminists argue that colonial oppression and Western feminism marginalized postcolonial women but did not turn them passive or voiceless. Third-world feminism is closely related.[43] These discourses are related to African feminism, motherism,[51] Stiwanism,[52] negofeminism,[53] femalism, transnational feminism, and Africana womanism.[54]

Postmodern feminists argue that sex and gender are socially constructed,[55] that it is impossible to generalize women's experiences across cultures and histories,[56] and that dualisms and traditional gender, feminism, and politics are too limiting.[57] Post-structural feminism uses various intellectual currents for feminist concerns.[58] Many post-structural feminists maintain that difference is one of the most powerful tools that women possess.[58][59] Contemporary psychoanalytic French feminism is more philosophical and literary than is Anglophone feminism.[citation needed]

Riot grrrl (or riot grrl) is an underground feminist punk movement that started in the 1990s and is often associated with third-wave feminism (it is sometimes seen as its starting point). It was grounded in the DIY philosophy of punk values. Riot grrls took an anti-corporate stance of self-sufficiency and self-reliance.[60] Riot grrrl's emphasis on universal female identity and separatism often appears more closely allied with second-wave feminism than with the third wave.[61] The movement encouraged and made "adolescent girls’ standpoints central," allowing them to express themselves fully.[62]

Lipstick feminism is a cultural feminist movement that attempts to respond to the backlash of second-wave radical feminism of the 1960s and 1970s by reclaiming symbols of "feminine" identity such as make-up, suggestive clothing and having a sexual allure as valid and empowering personal choices.[63][64]

Religious

Cmdr. Adrienne Simmons speaking at the 2008 ceremony for the first and only women's mosque in Khost City, a symbol of progress for growing women's rights in the Pashtun belt.

Christian feminism is a branch of feminist theology which seeks to interpret and understand Christianity in light of the equality of women and men. Because this equality has been historically ignored, Christian feminists believe their contributions are necessary for a complete understanding of Christianity. While there is no standard set of beliefs among Christian feminists, most agree that God does not discriminate on the basis of biologically-determined characteristics such as sex. Their major issues are the ordination of women, male dominance in Christian marriage, and claims of moral deficiency and inferiority of abilities of women compared to men. They also are concerned with the balance of parenting between mothers and fathers and the overall treatment of women in the church.[65][66]

Islamic feminism is concerned with the role of women in Islam and aims for the full equality of all Muslims, regardless of gender, in public and private life. Islamic feminists advocate women's rights, gender equality, and social justice grounded in an Islamic framework. Although rooted in Islam, the movement's pioneers have also utilized secular and Western feminist discourses and recognize the role of Islamic feminism as part of an integrated global feminist movement.[67] Advocates of the movement seek to highlight the deeply rooted teachings of equality in the Quran and encourage a questioning of the patriarchal interpretation of Islamic teaching through the Quran, hadith (sayings of Muhammad), and sharia (law) towards the creation of a more equal and just society.[68]

Jewish feminism is a movement that seeks to improve the religious, legal, and social status of women within Judaism and to open up new opportunities for religious experience and leadership for Jewish women. Feminist movements, with varying approaches and successes, have opened up within all major branches of Judaism. In its modern form, the movement can be traced to the early 1970s in the United States. According to Judith Plaskow, who has focused on feminism in Reform Judaism, the main issues for early Jewish feminists in these movements were the exclusion from the all-male prayer group or minyan, the exemption from positive time-bound mitzvot, and women's inability to function as witnesses and to initiate divorce.[69]

The Dianic Wicca or Wiccan feminism is a female focused, Goddess-centered Wiccan sect; also known as a feminist religion that teaches witchcraft as every woman’s right. It is also one sect of the many practiced in Wicca.[70]

Societal impact

Main article: Feminist effects on society

The feminist movement has effected change in Western society, including women's suffrage; in education; in gender neutrality in English; job pay more nearly equal to men's; the right to initiate divorce proceedings; the reproductive rights of women to make individual decisions on pregnancy (including access to contraceptives and abortion); and the right to enter into contracts and own property.[71][72] Feminists have struggled to protect women and girls from domestic violence, sexual harassment, and sexual assault,[14][73][74] emphasizing the grounds as women's rights, rather than as men's traditional interests in families' safety for reproductive purposes. On economic matters, feminists have advocated for workplace rights, including maternity leave, and against other forms of gender-specific discrimination against women.[71][72][75] They have achieved some protections and societal changes through sharing experiences, developing theory, and campaigning for rights.[73][76][77][78][79]

Civil rights

Participation in the CEDAW (By Canuckguy et al. & Allstar86 (attributed per Wikipedia file CEDAW_Participation.svg, as accessed Jul. 26, 2010).)

From the 1960s on, the campaign for women's rights[80] was met with mixed results[81] in the U.S. and the U.K. Other countries of the EEC agreed to ensure that discriminatory laws would be phased out across the European Community.

In the U.S., the National Organization for Women (NOW) began in 1966 to seek women's equality, including through the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA),[82] which did not pass, although some states enacted their own. Reproductive rights in the U.S. centered on the court decision in Roe v. Wade enunciating a woman's right to choose whether to carry a pregnancy to term. Western women gained more reliable birth control, allowing family planning and careers. The movement started in the 1910s in the U.S. under Margaret Sanger and elsewhere under Marie Stopes and grew in the late 20th century.

The division of labor within households was affected by the increased entry of women into workplaces in the 20th century. Sociologist Arlie Russell Hochschild found that, in two-career couples, men and women, on average, spend about equal amounts of time working, but women still spend more time on housework,[83][84] although Cathy Young responded by arguing that women may prevent equal participation by men in housework and parenting.[85]

In international law, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) is an international convention adopted by the United Nations General Assembly and described as an international bill of rights for women. It came into force in those nations ratifying it.[86]

In the final three decades of the 20th century, Western women knew a new freedom through birth control, which enabled women to plan their adult lives, often making way for both career and family. The movement had been started in the 1910s by US pioneering social reformer Margaret Sanger and in the UK and internationally by Marie Stopes.[87]

Language

Further information: Gender-neutral language in English

Gender-neutral language is a description of language usages which are aimed at minimizing assumptions regarding the biological sex of human referents. The advocacy of gender-neutral language reflects, at least, two different agendas: one aims to clarify the inclusion of both sexes or genders (gender-inclusive language); the other proposes that gender, as a category, is rarely worth marking in language (gender-neutral language). Gender-neutral language is sometimes described as non-sexist language by advocates and politically-correct language by opponents.[88]

Theology

See also: Feminist theology and God and gender

Feminist theology is a movement that reconsiders the traditions, practices, scriptures, and theologies of religions from a feminist perspective. Some of the goals of feminist theology include increasing the role of women among the clergy and religious authorities, reinterpreting male-dominated imagery and language about God, determining women's place in relation to career and motherhood, and studying images of women in the religion's sacred texts.[89]

Culture

Main article: Feminism in culture

Distinction between sex and gender

The distinction between sex and gender is generally that sex is biological (e.g., chromosomal or morphological) while gender is social or cultural (e.g., how societies structure relationships).[90]

Men and masculinity

Main article: Men and feminism

Feminist theory has explored the social construction of masculinity and its implications for the goal of gender equality. The social construct of masculinity is seen as problematic as it associates males with aggression and competition, and reinforces patriarchy and unequal gender relations.[18][91] The concept of masculinity is also seen as harmful to men by narrowing their life choices, limiting their sexuality, and blocking full emotional connections with women and other men.[92] Some feminists are engaged with men's issues activism, such as correcting legal and social imbalances in regard to father's rights, bringing attention to male rape and spousal battery, and addressing negative social expectations for men.[93][94][95]

Male participation in feminism is encouraged by feminists and is seen as an important strategy for achieving full societal commitment to gender equality.[36][96][97] Many male feminists and pro-feminists are active in both women's rights activism, feminist theory, and masculinity studies. However, some argue that while male engagement with feminism is necessary, it is problematic due to the ingrained social influences of patriarchy in gender relations.[98] The consensus today in feminist and masculinity theories is that both genders can and should cooperate to achieve the larger goals of feminism.[92]

Debates have emerged within feminism over whether patriarchy is the primary cause of women's oppression, as radical feminist theory asserts, or whether legal systems and class conflict play a large role as well, as is proposed in other feminist movements such as liberal feminism and socialist feminism.[99] Liberal feminism sees sex roles as the agent of women's and men's oppression, with both genders as participants.[100][101] Some radical feminists have proposed that because patriarchy is too deeply rooted in society, separatism is the only viable solution.[102] Other feminists have criticized these radical feminist views as being anti-men, though some radical feminists reject this portrayal of their views.[103][104][105] Societal tension caused by second-wave feminism gave rise to backlash in the form of anti-feminist men's movements, such as Masculism, though today some see masculism as a complementary movement that does not oppose feminism.[92][106] Some feminists have argued that associating feminism with misandry is an anti-feminist strategy to discredit the movement, even though misandry is not a part of feminism and feminists are not more likely to hate men than non-feminists, and that this characterization has contributed to both men and women's reluctance to identify as feminist despite agreeing with the movement's goals.[107][108][109]

Architecture

Gender-based inquiries into and conceptualization of architecture have also come about, leading to feminism in modern architecture. Piyush Mathur coined the term "archigenderic". Claiming that "architectural planning has an inextricable link with the defining and regulation of gender roles, responsibilities, rights, and limitations", Mathur came up with that term "to explore...the meaning of 'architecture' in terms of gender" and "to explore the meaning of 'gender' in terms of architecture".[110]

Women's writing

Octavia Butler, award winning feminist science fiction author.
Further information: Women's writing in English and Women's literature written in English

Women's writing came to exist as a separate category of scholarly interest relatively recently. In the West, second-wave feminism prompted a general reevaluation of women's historical contributions, and various academic sub-disciplines, such as Women's history (or herstory) and women's writing, developed in response to the belief that women's lives and contributions have been underrepresented as areas of scholarly interest.[111] Virginia Balisn et al. characterize the growth in interest since 1970 in women's writing as "powerful".[111] Much of this early period of feminist literary scholarship was given over to the rediscovery and reclamation of texts written by women. Studies such as Dale Spender's Mothers of the Novel (1986) and Jane Spencer's The Rise of the Woman Novelist (1986) were ground-breaking in their insistence that women have always been writing. Commensurate with this growth in scholarly interest, various presses began the task of reissuing long-out-of-print texts. Virago Press began to publish its large list of nineteenth and early-twentieth-century novels in 1975 and became one of the first commercial presses to join in the project of reclamation. In the 1980s Pandora Press, responsible for publishing Spender's study, issued a companion line of eighteenth-century novels written by women.[112]

Feminist science fiction

Main article: Feminist science fiction

In the 1960s the genre of science fiction combined its sensationalism with political and technological critiques of society. With the advent of feminism, questioning women’s roles became fair game to this "subversive, mind expanding genre".[113] Two early texts are Ursula K. Le Guin's The Left Hand of Darkness (1969) and Joanna Russ' The Female Man (1970). They serve to highlight the socially constructed nature of gender roles by creating utopias that do away with gender.[114] Both authors were also pioneers in feminist criticism of science fiction in the 1960s and 70s, in essays collected in The Language of the Night (Le Guin, 1979) and How To Suppress Women's Writing (Russ, 1983). Another major work of feminist science fiction has been[115] Kindred by Octavia Butler.

Sexuality

Lesbianism and bisexuality were accepted as part of feminism by a significant proportion of feminists, while others considered sexuality irrelevant to the attainment of other goals. Sexuality, sexual representation, sadomasochism, the role of transwomen in the lesbian community, and other sexual issues arose within acrimonious feminist debates known as the feminist sex wars.

Opinions on the sex industry are diverse. They are generally either critical of it (seeing it as exploitative, a result of patriarchal social structures and reinforcing sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in rape and sexual harassment) or supportive of at least parts of it (arguing that some forms of it can be a medium of feminist expression and a means of women taking control of their sexuality).

Pornography

Further information: Feminist sex wars
See also: Anti-pornography § Feminist objections, and Sex-positive feminism

The "Feminist Sex Wars" is a term for the acrimonious debates within the feminist movement in the late 1970s through the 1980s around the issues of feminism, sexuality, sexual representation, pornography, sadomasochism, the role of transwomen in the lesbian community, and other sexual issues. The debate pitted anti-pornography feminism against sex-positive feminism, and parts of the feminist movement were deeply divided by these debates.[116][117][118][119][120]

Prostitution and trafficking

Main article: Feminist views on prostitution

Feminsts' views on prostitution vary, but many of these perspectives can be loosely arranged into an overarching standpoint that is generally either critical or supportive of prostitution and sex work.[121] Anti-prostitution feminists are strongly opposed to prostitution, as they see the practice as a form of violence against and exploitation of women, and a sign of male dominance over women. Feminists who hold such views on prostitution include Kathleen Barry, Melissa Farley,[122][123] Julie Bindel,[124][125] Sheila Jeffreys, Catharine MacKinnon[126] and Laura Lederer;[127] the European Women's Lobby has also condemned prostitution as "an intolerable form of male violence".[128]

Other feminists hold that prostitution and other forms of sex work can be valid choices for women and men who choose to engage in it. In this view, prostitution must be differentiated from forced prostitution, and feminists should support sex worker activism against abuses by both the sex industry and the legal system. The disagreement between these two feminist stances has proven particularly contentious, and may be comparable to the feminist sex wars of the late twentieth century.[129]

Relationship to political movements

In the U.S., feminism, when politically active, formerly aligned largely with the political right, e.g., through the National Woman's Party, from the 1910s to the 1960s, and presently aligns largely with the left, e.g., through the National Organization for Women, of the 1960s to the present, although in neither case has the alignment been consistent.

Socialism

Main article: The left and feminism

Since the early twentieth century some feminists have allied with socialism. In 1907 there was an International Conference of Socialist Women in Stuttgart where suffrage was described as a tool of class struggle. Clara Zetkin of the Social Democratic Party of Germany called for women's suffrage to build a "socialist order, the only one that allows for a radical solution to the women's question".[130][131][132][133]

In Britain, the women's movement was allied with the Labour party. In the U.S., Betty Friedan emerged from a radical background to take leadership. Radical Women is the oldest socialist feminist organization in the U.S. and is still active.[134] During the Spanish Civil War, Dolores Ibárruri (La Pasionaria) led the Communist Party of Spain. Although she supported equal rights for women, she opposed women fighting on the front and clashed with the anarcha-feminist Mujeres Libres.[135]

In Latin America, revolutions brought changes in women's status in countries such as Nicaragua, where feminist ideology during the Sandinista Revolution aided women's quality of life but fell short of achieving a social and ideological change.[136]

Fascism

Scholars have argued that Nazi Germany and the other fascist states of the 1930s and 1940s illustrates the disastrous consequences for society of a state ideology that, in glorifying women, becomes anti-feminist.[137] In Germany after the rise of Nazism in 1933, there was a rapid dissolution of the political rights and economic opportunities that feminists had fought for during the prewar period and to some extent during the 1920s. In Franco's Spain, the right wing Catholic conservatives undid the work of feminists during the Republic. Fascist society was hierarchical with an emphasis and idealization of virility, with women maintaining a largely subordinate position to men.[133]

Science

Some feminists, such as Evelyn Fox Keller, criticize traditional scientific discourse as historically biased towards a masculine perspective,[75] including the idea of scientific objectivity. Primatologist Sarah Blaffer Hrdy notes the prevalence of masculinely coined stereotypes and theories, such as of the non-sexual female, despite "the accumulation of abundant openly available evidence contradicting it".[138]

Many feminist scholars rely on qualitative scientific research methods that emphasize women's subjective and individual experiences, including treating research participants as authorities equal to the researcher. Objectivity is eschewed in favor of open self-reflexivity and the agenda of helping women. Also, part of the feminist research agenda is the uncovering of ways in which power inequities are created and/or reinforced in society and in scientific and academic institutions. A feminist approach to research often involves nontraditional forms of presentation.[139]

Biology of gender

Modern feminist science challenges the biological essentialist view of gender.[140][141] However, it is increasingly interested in the study of biological sex differences and their effect on human behavior. For example, Anne Fausto-Sterling's book, Myths of Gender, explores the assumptions embodied in scientific research that purports to support a biologically essentialist view of gender.[142]

Her second book, Sexing the Body, discussed the alleged possibility of more than two true biological sexes. This possibility only exists in yet-unknown extraterrestrial biospheres, as no ratios of true gametes to polar cells other than 4:0 and 1:3 (male and female, respectively) are produced on Earth. However, in The Female Brain, Louann Brizendine argues that brain differences between the sexes are a biological reality with significant implications for sex-specific functional differences.[143] Steven Rhoads illustrated sex-dependent differences across a wide scope.[144]

Carol Tavris, in The Mismeasure of Woman, uses psychology and sociology to critique theories that use essentialism and biological reductionism to explain differences between men and women. She argues that "women are not the better sex, the inferior sex or the opposite sex", rather she contends that there are ever-changing hypotheses that justify inequality and perpetuate stereotypes.[145]

Cordelia Fine, in Delusions of Gender, argues that there is currently no scientific evidence for innate biological differences between men and women's minds, and that cultural and societal beliefs contribute to commonly perceived sex differences.[146]

Evolutionary biology

Sarah Kember—drawing from numerous areas such as evolutionary biology, sociobiology, artificial intelligence, and cybernetics in development with a new evolutionism—discusses the biologization of technology. She notes how feminists and sociologists have become suspicious of evolutionary psychology, particularly in as much as sociobiology is subjected to complexity in order to strengthen sexual difference as immutable through pre-existing cultural value judgments about human nature and natural selection.[147] Where feminist theory is criticized for its "false beliefs about human nature", Kember then argues in conclusion that "feminism is in the interesting position of needing to do more biology and evolutionary theory in order not to simply oppose their renewed hegemony, but in order to understand the conditions that make this possible, and to have a say in the construction of new ideas and artefacts."[147]

Health

Feminism has led to increased participation by women in the health care they receive (e.g., the book Our Bodies, Ourselves), deliver (e.g., as doctors and midwives), and seek (e.g., lactivism).

Reactions

Different groups of people have responded to feminism, and both men and women have been among its supporters and critics. Among American university students, for both men and women, support for feminist ideas is more common than self-identification as a feminist.[148][149][150] The US media tends to portray feminism negatively and feminists "are less often associated with day-to-day work/leisure activities of regular women."[151][152]

Pro-feminism

Main article: Pro-feminism

Pro-feminism is the support of feminism without implying that the supporter is a member of the feminist movement. The term is most often used in reference to men who are actively supportive of feminism. The activities of pro-feminist men's groups include anti-violence work with boys and young men in schools, offering sexual harassment workshops in workplaces, running community education campaigns, and counseling male perpetrators of violence. Pro-feminist men also are involved in men's health, activism against pornography including anti-pornography legislation, men's studies, and the development of gender equity curricula in schools. This work is sometimes in collaboration with feminists and women's services, such as domestic violence and rape crisis centers. Some activists of both genders will not refer to men as "feminists" at all and will refer to all pro-feminist men as "pro-feminists".[153][154]

Anti-feminism

Main article: Anti-feminism

Anti-feminism is opposition to feminism in some or all of its forms.[155]

In the nineteenth century, anti-feminism was mainly focused on opposition to women's suffrage. Later, opponents of women's entry into institutions of higher learning argued that education was too great a physical burden on women. Other anti-feminists opposed women's entry into the labor force, or their right to join unions, to sit on juries, or to obtain birth control and control of their sexuality.[156]

Some people have opposed feminism on the grounds that they believe it is contrary to traditional values or religious beliefs. These anti-feminists argue, for example, that social acceptance of divorce and non-married women is wrong and harmful, and that men and women are fundamentally different and thus their different traditional roles in society should be maintained.[157][158][159] Other anti-feminists oppose women's entry into the workforce, political office, and the voting process, as well as the lessening of male authority in families.[160][161]

Writers such as Camille Paglia, Christina Hoff Sommers, Jean Bethke Elshtain, Elizabeth Fox-Genovese and Daphne Patai oppose some forms of feminism, though they identify as feminists. They argue, for example, that feminism often promotes misandry and the elevation of women's interests above men's, and criticize radical feminist positions as harmful to both men and women.[162] Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge argue that the term "anti-feminist" is used to silence academic debate about feminism.[163]

See also

References

  1. ^ http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminism
  2. ^ http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/feminism
  3. ^ http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/features/dictionary/DictionaryResults.aspx?refid=1861610952
  4. ^ a b Chodorow, Nancy (1989). Feminism and Psychoanalytic Theory. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-05116-2. Cite error: The named reference "Chodorow1989" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. ^ a b Gilligan, Carol (1977). "'In a Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and Morality'". Harvard Educational Review. 47 (4): 481–517. Retrieved 2008-06-08. Cite error: The named reference "gilligan1977" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  6. ^ Krolokke, Charlotte (2005). "Three Waves of Feminism: From Suffragettes to Grrls". Gender Communication Theories and Analyses:From Silence to Performance. Sage. p. 24. ISBN 0761929185. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  7. ^ a b c d Freedman, Estelle B. (2003). No Turning Back : The History of Feminism and the Future of Women. Ballantine Books. p. 464. ISBN 0-345-45053-1. Cite error: The named reference "Freedman" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  8. ^ Phillips, Melanie (2004). The ascent of woman: a history of the suffragette movement and the ideas behind it. London: Abacus. ISBN 978-0-349-11660-0.
  9. ^ DuBois, Ellen Carol (1997). Harriot Stanton Blatch and the winning of woman suffrage. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-06562-0. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
  10. ^ Flexner, Eleanor, Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States (The Belknap Press, 1996), ISBN 9780674106539
  11. ^ Wheeler, Marjorie W. (1995). One woman, one vote: rediscovering the woman suffrage movement. Troutdale, OR: NewSage Press. ISBN 978-0-939165-26-0. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
  12. ^ Stevens, Doris (1995). Jailed for freedom: American women win the vote. Troutdale, OR: NewSage Press. ISBN 978-0-939165-25-2. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  13. ^ Whelehan, Imelda (1995). Modern feminist thought: from the second wave to "post-feminism". Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. ISBN 978-0-7486-0621-4.
  14. ^ a b c Echols, Alice (1989). Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America, 1967–1975. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. p. 416. ISBN 0-8166-1787-2.
  15. ^ Hanisch, Carol (2006-01-01). "Hanisch, New Intro to "The Personal is Political" - Second Wave and Beyond". The Personal Is Political. Retrieved 2008-06-08.
  16. ^ Henry, Astrid (2004). Not my mother's sister: generational conflict and third-wave feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-21713-4.
  17. ^ a b Gillis, Stacy (2007). Third wave feminism: a critical exploration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-52174-2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  18. ^ a b Faludi, Susan (1992). Backlash: the undeclared war against women. London: Vintage. ISBN 978-0-09-922271-2.
  19. ^ a b c Walker, Alice (1983). In Search of Our Mothers' Gardens: Womanist Prose. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. p. 397. ISBN 0-15-144525-7. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  20. ^ Leslie, Heywood; Drake, Jennifer (1997). Third wave agenda: being feminist, doing feminism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0-8166-3005-4. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^ Gilligan, Carol (1993). In a different voice: psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. p. 184. ISBN 0-674-44544-9.
  22. ^ Wright, Elizabeth (2000). Lacan and Postfeminism (Postmodern Encounters). Totem Books. ISBN 978-1-84046-182-9. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
  23. ^ Modleski, Tania (1991). Feminism without women: culture and criticism in a "postfeminist" age. New York: Routledge. p. 188. ISBN 0-415-90416-1.
  24. ^ Jones, Amelia. “Postfeminism, Feminist Pleasures, and Embodied Theories of Art,” in New Feminist Criticism: Art, Identity, Action, ed. by Joana Frueh, Cassandra L. Langer and Arlene Raven. New York: HarperCollins, 1994. 16-41, 20.
  25. ^ Zajko, Vanda (2006). Laughing with Medusa: classical myth and feminist thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 445. ISBN 0-19-927438-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  26. ^ Howe, Mica; Aguiar, Sarah Appleton (2001). He said, she says: an RSVP to the male text. Madison N.J.: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press. p. 292. ISBN 0-8386-3915-1. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ Griselda Pollock, Encounters in the Virtual Feminist Museum: Time, Space and the Archive. Routledge, 2007.
  28. ^ Ettinger, Bracha (2006). The matrixial borderspace. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. p. 245. ISBN 0-8166-3587-0. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  29. ^ Brabeck, M. and Brown, L. (With Christian, L., Espin, O., Hare-Mustin, R., Kaplan, A., Kaschak, E., Miller, D., Phillips, E., Ferns, T., and Van Ormer, A.). (1997). Feminist theory and psychological practice. In J. Worell and N. Johnson (Eds.) Shaping the future of feminist psychology: Education, research, and practice) (pp.15-35). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
  30. ^ Florence, Penny (2001). Differential aesthetics: art practices, philosophy and feminist understandings. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate. p. 360. ISBN 0-7546-1493-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  31. ^ Showalter, Elaine (1985). The New feminist criticism: essays on women, literature, and theory. New York: Pantheon. ISBN 978-0-394-72647-2. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  32. ^ Moi, Toril (2002). Sexual/textual politics: feminist literary theory. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-28012-9.
  33. ^ Marx, Karl, trans. B. Fowkes, Capital (Penguin Classics, 1990 (ISBN 978-0-14-044568-8)).
  34. ^ Connolly, Clara (1986). "Feminism and Class Politics: A Round-Table Discussion". Feminist Review (Socialist-Feminism: Out of the Blue): 17. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |number= and |issue= specified (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  35. ^ Dunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne (2002). Quiet Rumours. AK Press. ISBN 978-1-902593-40-1.
  36. ^ a b bell hooks (2000), Feminism is for Everybody: Pasionate Politics. Cited in Austin, Hannah (2004) "Separatism: Are We Limiting Ourselves?", EM 4:2
  37. ^ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  38. ^ "XXX: A Woman's Right to Pornography". Retrieved 2008-07-08.
  39. ^ Biehl, Janet (1991). Rethinking Eco-Feminist Politics. Boston, Massachusetts: South End Press. ISBN 978-0-89608-392-9.
  40. ^ Alcoff, Linda (1998). "Cultural Feminism Versus Post-Structuralism: the Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory". Signs. 13 (3). The University of Chicago Press: 32. doi:10.1086/494426. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |number= and |issue= specified (help); Unknown parameter |DUPLICATE DATA: unused_data= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |unused_data= ignored (help)
  41. ^ Taylor, Verta (1993). "# Women's Culture and Lesbian Feminist Activism: A Reconsideration of Cultural Feminism". Signs. 19 (1). The University of Chicago Press: 30. doi:10.1086/494861. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |number= and |issue= specified (help); Unknown parameter |coauthor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |unused_data= ignored (help)
  42. ^ a b c Hill Collins, P., Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment (New York: Routledge, 2000).
  43. ^ a b c Narayan, Uma (1997). Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third-World Feminism. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91418-3. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  44. ^ Ogunyemi, C. O. (1985). "Womanism: The Dynamics of the Black Female Novel in English". Signs. 1 (1): 17.
  45. ^ Kolawole, Mary Ebun Modupe (1997). Womanism and African Consciousness. Trenton, N.J.: Africa World Press. p. 216. ISBN 0-86543-540-5.
  46. ^ "Defining Black Feminist Thought". Retrieved May 31, 2007.
  47. ^ Davis, Angela, Women, Race, and Class.
  48. ^ "List of Books written by Black Feminists". Retrieved May 31, 2007.
  49. ^ Baca Zinn, Maxine (2002). "Theorizing Difference from Multiracial Feminism.". In Carole R. McCann & Seung-Kyung Kim (ed.). Feminist Theory Reader: Local and Global Perspectives. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0415931525. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthor= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  50. ^ Harding, Sandra (2004). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-94501-1.
  51. ^ Obianuju Acholonu, Catherine (1995). Motherism: The Afrocentric Alternative to Feminism. Afa Publ. p. 144. ISBN 9783199714.
  52. ^ Ogundipe-Leslie, Molara (1994). Re-creating Ourselves: African Women & Critical Transformations. Africa World Press. p. 262. ISBN 0865434123.
  53. ^ Nnaemeka, O. (1970). "Feminism, Rebellious Women, and Cultural Boundaries". Research in African Literatures.
  54. ^ Hudson-Weems, Clenora (1994). Africana Womanism: Reclaiming Ourselves. Troy, Mich.: Bedford Publishers. p. 158. ISBN 0-911557-11-3.
  55. ^ Butler, Judith (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge. ISBN 9780415924993.
  56. ^ Benhabib, Seyla (1995). "From Identity Politics to Social Feminism: A Plea for the Nineties". Philosophy of Education. 1 (2): 14.
  57. ^ Harraway, Donna (1991). "Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century". Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge. p. 32. ISBN 1853431389.
  58. ^ a b Barbara Johnson (2002). The Feminist Difference: Literature, Psychoanalysis, Race and Gender. Harvard University Press. p. 224. ISBN 0674001915.
  59. ^ Irigaray, Luce (1999). "When Our Lips Speak Together". In Price, Janet (ed.). Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader. Shildrick, Margrit. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-92566-5. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  60. ^ Rowe-Finkbeiner, Kristin (2004). The F-Word: Feminism In Jeopardy—Women, Politics and the Future. Seal Press. ISBN 1-58005-114-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  61. ^ Rosenberg, Jessica (Spring 1998). "Riot Grrrl: Revolutions from within". Signs. 23 (Feminisms and Youth Cultures): 809. doi:10.1086/495289. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |number= and |issue= specified (help); Unknown parameter |co-author= ignored (help)
  62. ^ Code, Lorraine (2004). Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories. London: Routledge. p. 560. ISBN 10415308852. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help)
  63. ^ Scanlon, Jennifer, Bad girls go everywhere: the life of Helen Gurley Brown, Oxford University Press US, 2009, ISBN 0195342054, 9780195342055
  64. ^ Joanne Hollows; Rachel Moseley (17 February 2006). Feminism in popular culture. Berg Publishers. p. 84. ISBN 9781845202231. http://books.google.com/books?id=0RuRknkzxe4C&pg=PA84. Retrieved 18 January 2011.
  65. ^ Haddad, Mimi (Autumn 2006). "Egalitarian Pioneers: Betty Friedan or Catherine Booth?". Priscilla Papers. 20 (4). {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= / |date= mismatch (help)
  66. ^ Anderson, Pamela Sue (2004). Feminist philosophy of religion: critical readings. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-25749-2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  67. ^ Catalonian Islamic Board (24th-27th October 2008). "II International Congress on Islamic Feminism". feminismeislamic.org. Retrieved 2008-07-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  68. ^ Badran, Margot (17 - 23 January 2002). "Al-Ahram Weekly: Islamic feminism: what's in a name?". Retrieved 2008-07-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  69. ^ Plaskow, Judith (2003). "Jewish Feminist Thought". In Frank, Daniel H. (ed.). History of Jewish philosophy. Leaman, Oliver. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-32469-6.
  70. ^ Raphael, Melissa (1999). "Chapter ^: Feminist Witchcraft". Introducing Thealogy: Discourse on the Goddess. Routledge. ISBN 1850759758.
  71. ^ a b Butler, Judith (1992). "Feminism in Any Other Name". Differences. 6 (2–3): 30. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  72. ^ a b Messer-Davidow, Ellen (2002). Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to Academic Discourse. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-2843-7. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
  73. ^ a b Cornell, Drucilla (1998). At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex, and Equality. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-02896-5.
  74. ^ Campaign: Stop Violence against Women.
  75. ^ a b Price, Janet (1999). Feminist Theory and the Body: A Reader. New York: Routledge. p. 487. ISBN 0-415-92566-5. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  76. ^ Humm, Maggie (1992). Modern Feminisms: Political, Literary, Cultural. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-08072-7. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  77. ^ Collins Dictionary and Thesaurus. London: Collins. 2006. ISBN 0-00-722405-2.
  78. ^ Humm, Maggie (1990). The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Columbus: Ohio State University Press. p. 278. ISBN 0-8142-0506-2.
  79. ^ Agnes, Michael (2007). Webster's New World College Dictionary. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-7645-7125-7.
  80. ^ Lockwood, Bert B. (2006). Women's Rights: A Human Rights Quarterly Reader. The Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-8374-3.
  81. ^ "FROM SUFFRAGE TO WOMEN'S LIBERATION: FEMINISM IN TWENTIETH CENTURY AMERICA by Jo Freeman".
  82. ^ "The National Organization for Women's 1966 Statement of Purpose".
  83. ^ Hochschild, Arlie Russell (2003). The Second Shift. New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-200292-6. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  84. ^ Hochschild, Arlie Russell (2001). The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work. New York: Henry Holt & Co. ISBN 978-0-8050-6643-2.
  85. ^ Young, Cathy. "The Mama Lion at the Gate". Salon.com. Retrieved 2008-07-08.
  86. ^ "http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cedaw.htm". Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. Retrieved 2009-09-06. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  87. ^ "Margaret Sanger".
  88. ^ ""Gender Neutral Language." University of Saskatchewan Policies 2001". Retrieved 2007-03-25.
  89. ^ Bundesen, Lynne. The Feminine Spirit: Recapturing the Heart of Scripture. Jossey-Bass. ISBN 978-0-7879-8495-3.
  90. ^ Tarrant, Shira, When Sex Became Gender (Routledge, 2006),
  91. ^ Tong, Rosemarie Putnam, Feminist Thought: A More Comprehensive Introduction (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 2d ed. 1998 (ISBN 0-8133-3295-8)), p. 70
  92. ^ a b c Gardiner, Judith Kegan, Masculinity studies and feminist theory, Columbia University Press, 2002, ISBN 0231122780, 9780231122788
  93. ^ Harv. Women's L.J. 107 (1978) Fathers' Rights and Feminism: The Maternal Presumption Revisited; Uviller, Rena K.
  94. ^ Unwed Fathers' Rights, Adoption, and Sex Equality: Gender-Neutrality and the Perpetuation of Patriarchy
  95. ^ Feminism for Men: Legal Ideology and the Construction of Maleness, N Levit - UCLA L. Rev., 1995 - works.bepress.com
  96. ^ Digby, Tom (1998). Men Doing Feminism. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-91625-7.
  97. ^ Phillips, Layli, The Womanist reader, CRC Press, 2006, ISBN 0415954118, 9780415954112
  98. ^ Jardine, Alice, Paul Smith, Men in feminism , ISBN 0415902517, 9780415902519
  99. ^ Vetterling-Braggin, Mary, Frederick Elliston, Jane English, Feminism and philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield, 1977,ISBN 0822603357, 9780822603351
  100. ^ Wollstonecraft, Mary, A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, in A Vindication of the Rights of Men[/]A Vindication of the Rights of Woman[/]An Historical and Moral View of the French Revolution (or A Vindication of the Rights of Woman[/]A Vindication of the Rights of Men) (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press (Oxford World's Classics ser.), reissue 1999 (ISBN 0-19-283652-8)), p. 231 and see generally ch. IX, Of the Pernicious Effects Which Arise From the Unnatural Distinctions Established in Society (reprints of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (2d ed. 1792) & A Vindication of the Rights of Men (2d ed. 1790)).
  101. ^ Echols, Alice, Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America: 1967–1975 (Minneapolis, Minn.: Univ. of Minn. Press (American Culture ser.), 1989 (ISBN 0-8166-1787-2)), pp. 199–200 & nn. 318–319 (author then visiting asst. prof. history, Univ. of Ariz. at Tucson).
  102. ^ Sarah Hoagland, Lesbian Ethics: toward new value
  103. ^ Friedan, Betty. The Second Stage: With a New Introduction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, © 1981 1986 1991 1998, 1st Harvard Univ. Press pbk. ed. (ISBN 0-674-79655-1) 1998.
  104. ^ Bullough, Vern L. Human sexuality: an encyclopedia, Taylor & Francis, 1994, ISBN 0824079728, 9780824079727
  105. ^ Echols, Alice, Daring to Be Bad, op. cit., p. 78 & n. 124 ("124. Interview with Cindy Cisler.") and see p. 119.
  106. ^ Honderich, Ted, The Oxford companion to philosophy',' Oxford University Press, 1995, ISBN 0198661320, 9780198661320
  107. ^ Feminism and women's rights worldwide, Volume 1 (page 5) Author: Michele A. Paludi Editor: Michele A. Paludi Edition: illustrated Publisher: ABC-CLIO, 2010 ISBN 0313375968, 9780313375965.
  108. ^ Barbara Ryan, Identity politics in the women's movement, NYU Press, 2001, ISBN 0814774792, 9780814774793.
  109. ^ 2 Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L. 8 (1994-1995), Feminist Lawmaking and Historical Consciousness: Bringing the Past into the Future; Schneider, Elizabeth M.
  110. ^ Mathur, Piyush, in Women's Writing, p. 71 (1998) (British journal) (article).
  111. ^ a b Blain, Virginia (1990). The feminist companion to literature in English: women writers from the Middle Ages to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 1231. ISBN 0-300-04854-8. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  112. ^ Sandra M. Gilbert, "Paperbacks: From Our Mothers' Libraries: women who created the novel." New York Times, May 4, 1986.
  113. ^ Clute, John (1995). The Encyclopedia of science fiction. New York: St. Martin's Griffin. p. 1386. ISBN 0-312-13486-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  114. ^ Elyce Rae Helford, in Westfahl, Gary. The Greenwood Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy: Greenwood Press, 2005: 290.
  115. ^ Sturgis, Susanna. Octavia E. Butler: June 22, 1947–February 24, 2006: The Women's Review of Books, 23(3): 19 May 2006.
  116. ^ Duggan, Lisa; Hunter, Nan D. (1995). Sex wars: sexual dissent and political culture. New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91036-6. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  117. ^ Hansen, Karen Tranberg; (1990). Women, class, and the feminist imagination: a socialist-feminist reader. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. ISBN 0-87722-630-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  118. ^ Gerhard, Jane F. (2001). Desiring revolution: second-wave feminism and the rewriting of American sexual thought, 1920 to 1982. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-11204-1.
  119. ^ Leidholdt, Dorchen; (1990). The Sexual liberals and the attack on feminism. New York: Pergamon Press. ISBN 0-08-037457-3. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  120. ^ Vance, Carole S. Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Thorsons Publishers. ISBN 0-04-440593-6.
  121. ^ O’Neill, Maggie (2001) Prostitution and Feminism. Polity Press: Cambridge pp. 14-16
  122. ^ Prostitution: Factsheet on Human Rights Violations. Prostitution Research & Education. Retrieved on 2009-09-03.
  123. ^ Farley, Mellisa, Prostitution and the Invisibility of Harm, cited to Women & Therapy, vol. 26, no. 3/4 (2003) 247–280, hosted by Prostitution Research & Education, as accessed Mar. 6, 2011. For a non-.pdf and shorter version, see excerpt (same author, title, and Women & Therapy citation), as accessed Mar. 6, 2011.
  124. ^ Julie Bindel (18 January 2006). "Eradicate the oldest oppression". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 May 2010.
  125. ^ Ending a trade in misery (10 September 2007). The Guardian. Retrieved on 2009-09-03.
  126. ^ Catharine A. MacKinnon (1993) "Prostitution And Civil Rights" Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, 1993, Volume 1: 13-31. Retrieved on 2009-09-03.
  127. ^ Lederer Laura J. Addressing Demand: Examining New Practices. Global Centurion. Retrieved on 2009-09-03.
  128. ^ http://www.womenslobby.eu/spip.php?article472&lang=en
  129. ^ Alexander, Priscilla (1997) Feminism, Sex Workers and Human Rights in Nagle, Jill (ed.) Whores and Other Feminists. Routledge: New York: pp. 83-90.
  130. ^ "Rossi, Elisabetta. L'emancipazione femminile in Russia prima e dopo la rivoluzione In difesa del marxismo Nr. 5".
  131. ^ "The Emancipation of Women in Russia before and after the Russian Revolution In Defence of Marxism".
  132. ^ Badia, Gilbert (1994). Zetkin. Femminista senza frontiere. University of Michigan. p. 320. ISBN 8885378536.
  133. ^ a b Duby, Georges (1994). A history of women in the West. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. p. 600. ISBN 0-674-40369-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  134. ^ The Radical Women Manifesto: Socialist Feminist Theory, Program and Organizational Structure. Seattle, WA: Red Letter Press. 2001. ISBN 0-932323-11-1. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  135. ^ Ibárruri, Dolores (1938). Speeches & Articles, 1936–1938. University of Michigan. p. 263.
  136. ^ Parpart, Jane L. Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and Development. Ottawa, Canada : International Development Research Centre 2000. p. 215. ISBN 0-88936-910-0. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  137. ^ Bridenthal, Renate (1984). When biology became destiny: women in Weimar and Nazi Germany. New York: Monthly Review Press. p. 364. ISBN 0-85345-642-9. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  138. ^ Blaffer Hrdy, Sarah. Infanticide: Comparative and Evolutionary Perspectives: Mother Nature: A History of Mothers, Infants and Natural Selection. Pantheon, 1999.
  139. ^ Lindlof, Thomas R., & Taylor, Bryan C., Qualitative Communication Research Methods (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2002 (978-0-7619-2493-7)), p. 357 (authors communication scholars).
  140. ^ Code, Lorraine, Encyclopedia of feminist theories, Taylor & Francis, 2000, ISBN 0415132746, 9780415132749, page 89
  141. ^ Bern, Sandra L., The lenses of gender: transforming the debate on sexual inequality, Yale University Press, 1993, ISBN 0300056761, 9780300056761, page 6.
  142. ^ Fausto-Sterling, Anne (1992). Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men. New York, New York: BasicBooks. ISBN 0-465-04792-0.
  143. ^ Brizendine, Louann (2007). The Female Brain. Bantam Press. ISBN 9780593058077.
  144. ^ Rhoads, Steven E. (2004). Taking Sex Differences Seriously. San Francisco, California: Encounter Books. ISBN 978-1-893554-93-1.
  145. ^ Tavris, Carol. The Mismeasure of Woman: : Why Women Are Not the Better Sex, Inferior or Opposite Sex. Simon & Schuster, 1992.
  146. ^ Fine, Cordelia. Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference. W. W. Norton & Company, 2010.
  147. ^ a b Kember, Sarah (2001). "Resisting the New Evolutionism". Women: a Cultural Review. 12 (1): 8. doi:10.1080/09574040110034075. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |unused_data= ignored (help)
  148. ^ Zucker, A. N. (2004), DISAVOWING SOCIAL IDENTITIES: WHAT IT MEANS WHEN WOMEN SAY, “I'M NOT A FEMINIST, BUT …”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28: 423–435. DOI.
  149. ^ Shawn Meghan Burn, Roger Aboud and Carey Moyles, "The Relationship Between Gender Social Identity and Support for Feminism", Sex Roles, Volume 42, Numbers 11-12, 1081-1089, DOI.
  150. ^ Claire M. Renzetti, "New wave or second stage? Attitudes of college women toward feminism ", Sex Roles, Volume 16, Numbers 5-6, 265-277, DOI.
  151. ^ Lind, R. A. and Salo, C. (2002), The Framing of Feminists and Feminism in News and Public Affairs Programs in U.S. Electronic Media. Journal of Communication, 52: 211–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02540.x
  152. ^ Roy, R. E., Weibust, K. S. and Miller, C. T. (2007), EFFECTS OF STEREOTYPES ABOUT FEMINISTS ON FEMINIST SELF-IDENTIFICATION. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31: 146–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00348.x
  153. ^ Lingard, Bob (1999). Men Engaging Feminisms: Pro-Feminism, Backlashes and Schooling. Buckingham, England: Open University Press. p. 192. ISBN 0-335-19818-X. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  154. ^ Kimmel, Michael S. (1992). Against the Tide: Pro-Feminist Men in the United States, 1776–1990: A Documentary History. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 978-0-8070-6767-3. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  155. ^ ""Anti-feminist." The Oxford English Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1989".
  156. ^ Kimmel, Michael (2004). "Antifeminism". In Kimmel, Michael. Men and Masculinities: A Social, Cultural, and Historical Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. pp. 35–7
  157. ^ Carrie L. Lukas, The politically incorrect guide to women, sex, and feminism, Regnery Publishing, 2006, ISBN 1596980036, 9781596980037
  158. ^ Mary A. Kassian, The feminist mistake: the radical impact of feminism on church and culture, Crossway, 2005, ISBN 1581345704, 9781581345704
  159. ^ Schlafly, Phyllis (1977). The Power of the Positive Woman. New York: Arlington House Publishers
  160. ^ Gottfried, Paul (2001). "The Trouble With Feminism". LewRockwell.com. http://www.lewrockwell.com/gottfried/gottfried9.html. Retrieved 2006-09-30.
  161. ^ Calvert, John Islamism: a documentary and reference Greenwood Publishing Group, 2008, 0313338566, 9780313338564
  162. ^ Sommers, Christina Hoff (1995). Who Stole Feminism?: How Women Have Betrayed Women. New York: Simon & Schuster. p. 320. ISBN 0-684-80156-6.
  163. ^ Patai, Daphne. Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies. ISBN 0739104551. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Bibliography

  • DuBois, Ellen Carol (1997). Harriot Stanton Blatch and the Winning of Woman Suffrage. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-06562-0. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
  • Flexner, Eleanor, Century of Struggle: The Woman's Rights Movement in the United States (The Belknap Press, 1996 (ISBN 9780674106539)).
  • Mathur, Piyush, "The Archigenderic Territories: Mansfield Park and A Handful of Dust, in Women's Writing 5:1,71–81 ([1]).
  • Stansell, Christine, The Feminist Promise: 1792 to the Present (2010 (ISBN 978-0-679-64314-2528)), pages.
  • Stevens, Doris (1995). Jailed for Freedom: American Women Win the Vote. Troutdale, OR: NewSage Press. ISBN 978-0-939165-25-2. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Wheeler, Marjorie W. (1995). One Woman, One Vote: Rediscovering the Woman Suffrage Movement. Troutdale, OR: NewSage Press. ISBN 978-0-939165-26-0. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)

Further reading

  • ""In labor alone is happiness": women's work, social work, and feminist reform endeavors in Wilhelmine Germany--a transatlantic perspective". Journal of Women's History. 16 (1). Indiana University Press. March 2004. ISSN 1042-7961.
Wikiquote has quotations related to Feminism.
Look up feminism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikiversity has learning resources about Women's Studies
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Feminism.

Template:Link GA Template:Link GA

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Feminism&oldid=421415996"