Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Queen zenobia (talk | contribs) at 13:31, 20 July 2011 (→‎Orhan Cem Çetin). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Note: This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Request to userify

Could the following deleted page be placed in my userspace please?

Thanks Mathewignash (talk) 18:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some of them that I looked at randomly were deleted per AFD. For what purpose do you want them restored? --B (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
They are all AFDs. I want to work on them to try to improve them. Mathewignash (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The concerns don't seem to be quality of the articles - they seem to be that minor characters are definitely not notable. Though another admin may feel differently, my inclination is that this should go to DRV - the consensus seems to be that these are not going to be notable regardless of the level of effort you put into them. --B (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My plan was merge some of the less-notable characters down to their team pages, and move the plot summary to episode listings, but I wanted access to the orignals to help write. If it's to much work, I'm sorry. Whatever you can do is fine. It would just help me having to re-research the characters.Mathewignash (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This might contribute to the notability discussion. CycloneGU (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Listen, I wrote the majority of the content of those pages, and I don't have copies of my work. I request you make it available to me please. You can userify, or email it to me. Mathewignash (talk) 23:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Varuninds

Please restore my last page

The article is a basic information and achievement of the person and the intention is not for advertisement any how... I will make the requirement changes as per the guidelines and help from wikipedia.

Thank you -Varuninds (talk) 05:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done There's a whole whack of issues here. First, conflict of interest - you cannot write an article about your organization or people within your organization. Second, this business itself does not appear to meet notability requirements, and the person in charge of it certainly does not, and was therefore highly WP:PROMO. There's more...however, even though you wrote this on your userpage, it still must meet certain limits to remain. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Hart_%28artist%29

Expired PROD, concern was: Non notable writer with no independent sources to prove notability. -74.113.216.69 (talk) 07:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:AcornComunicator.jpg

Source to be confirmed if/when restored. If source impossible to ascertain, image will be replaced with a new upload from one of the links below. Source can be requested from uploader User:TreveX. A free image will be difficult to obtain because this is now a rare piece of hardware. FUR difficult to compose without seeing image - this will be done. -Trevj (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Source is likely to be [1] or [2].

Not done. I'm sympathetic, but even if restored this will end up being deleted on NFCC grounds. This image is simply a picture of the computer and part of the cord sitting on what looks to be a dark brown faux wood grain table. I'd suggest contacting the owner of the first website you linked to and see if he's willing to release his pictures under an acceptable free license. Feel free to follow up on my talk page. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:How do you like Wednesday 2.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in How do you like Wednesday?. -Zundark (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Midhurst & Easebourne F.C.

This club have for many years played at Step 6 in the National League System in England - which my majority consensus for English Football clubs makes them notable and worthy of an article - and before its deletion, had been an article for many years. Its deletion makes Midhurst & Easebourne F.C. one of only 4 clubs who play at Step 6 and above in England, not to have their own article. Two others are new to Step 6 this season and the fourth is Rustington F.C. whose article has also been deleted and I'll be appealing that one too. -Madmax2011 (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is fundamentally wrong to be putting forward for deletion any Step 6 side in the National League System in England as they are clearly notable. In many ways the deletion of this page is an act of vandalism and should be restored forthwith to ensure compatibility with other Step 6 clubs. (Finnish Gas 13:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please review the original sourcing concerns, or the article may be nominated for deletion at WP:AFD. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rustington F.C.

Play at Step 6 - as per reason above for Midhurst & Easebourne F.C. -Madmax2011 (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is fundamentally wrong to be putting forward for deletion any Step 6 side in the National League System in England as they are clearly notable. In many ways the deletion of this page is an act of vandalism and should be restored forthwith to ensure compatibility with other Step 6 clubs. (Finnish Gas 13:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please review the original sourcing concerns, or the article may be nominated for deletion at WP:AFD. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Riftforge

no consensus -Krasimir (talk) 13:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Note: Wyatt Riot says the reason for deleting it was that the game was not reviewed by third parties. One reason is that it is still in beta.

More importantly, all web games suffer from a mainstream media bias. For example, Rune Scape which has a similar userbase to World of Warcraft still hasn't received a review from [GameSpot] after 10 years of operation. Wikipedia is an ONLINE encyclopedia, so it makes sense for it to provide info on topics which print encyclopedias don't.

Lastly, Wyatt is over-eager to suggest games for deletion as his talk page indicates.

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riftforge, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
also note that for games, as for any article subject, it is necessary to show notability by means of references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources; if the game is still in beta, this may not be possible, which means it is not yet ready for an article; and please read WP:NPA and WP:AGF. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NACHO Athletic Club

This is a running association founded 4 years ago in the Boston area that share the principals of the Hash House Harriers, which also have a wikipedia page. This is not for promotion of said club, but since they have been referenced in the Boston Globe, Boston Herald and in media news outlets for their participation in the Boston Marathon and other running activities, I thought it was notable to give them a wikipedia page. -Linzylinz (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Ponyo (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Please also see Wikipedia's guideline for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, there need to be multiple non-trivial reliable sources discussing your company for it to be included. --B (talk) 17:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aerodef, LLC

I am trying to create a page for my business, so people can see more information about it. I am not using it as advertising, but it would be great to have it connected to the Facebook profile of the business. I did not put any phone numbers or websites in there. Please do not delete it. People are interested in learning about the biz and this would be a great way to have them learn. I see many businesses on here, and I do not see why this would be deleted if it is just general info about the business. -Aerodef4 (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wwfwcwecwinvasion.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in WWF Invasion. -Zundark (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soldiers of Allah

reasoning -114.79.18.48 (talk) 21:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soldiers of Allah, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IPE Global

Even after providing verifiable references the page has been deleted. -Preethi31 (talk) 07:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Esta Krakower

research -184.77.70.58 (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you asking for the article to be restored permanently or are you just asking for a copy for research purposes? --B (talk) 21:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This article was PRODed by a sock puppet of an indefinitely blocked editor so I went ahead and restored it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salt Spring dollar

I The editor that he was unable to find significant coverage of this local promotional currency in third party sources. Well he didn't look very far. We have been written about in a number of publications including A History of the Canadian Dollar by James Powell, published by the Bank of Canada (2005), and more recently in Local Money: How to Make it Happen in Your Community by Peter North, published by Transition Books (2010) as well we do appear in well known complementary currency online directories such as the one maintained by E.F Schumacher Society at http://www.smallisbeautiful.org/local_currencies/currency_groups.html#canada. Many other communities in Canada have modelled themselves on us, and most anyone in the complementary currency field in Canada should certainly know about us -24.108.188.118 (talk) 23:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Onthegogo (talk), who proposed it, in case s/he wishes to nominate it at Articles for Deletion. You could improve the article by adding references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

low dose naltrexone


Good morning from Australia.

Please reinstate the page 'low dose naltrexone'.

Someone keeps changing and/or deleting the page.

Interestingly Steven N blog links keep popping up in this and related topics. Makes me wonder if he or an associate might be promoting Steve and his blog or changing and deleting this entry.

I haven't logged in, but my name is Cris Kerr of Case Health, Australia.

Sorry I haven't logged in. Not hiding, just way too many log-in requirements in this world!

I dearly hope you can help with this because the subject matter is worthy of Wiki and Wiki's time.

In anticipation of a favourable review :-) Cris

Cris Kerr Case Health, Australia Advocate for the value of Patient Testimony free ebook 'Those Who Suffer Much, Know Much' 5th 2010 edition http://www.ldnresearchtrustfiles.co.uk/docs/2010.pdf -220.237.76.147 (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat the advice given when you (not logged in, but same IP) raised this ten days ago: this page is only for requesting restoration of pages which have been deleted. The article you refer to has not been deleted: what you have is a content dispute about what should go in it. The place to discuss that is the article talk page, where you should try to reach WP:Consensus with other editors. If you cannot reach consensus, use WP:Dispute resolution. See also WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. JohnCD (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Raburn

Other BART directors past and present have biographical articles on Wikipedia. I somehow neglected to add a link to the BART bio page (which apparently is sufficient): http://bart.gov/about/bod/bodMembersDetail_04.aspx -CodeGeneratR (talk) 01:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Science of Soulmates

This book and website has a solid following on the net, and has been quoted and used for reference. eg: see http://www.scienceofsoulmates.com/Links for websites referencing. Article originally deleted because of perceived lack of notoriety, which now has been established over the subsequent 4 years. Sorry for the repeat, but the first submission did not record the reasoning. -1.153.248.236 (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Science of Soulmates, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Deskana (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (Everything before this was the template. My personal comments follow.) Honestly, I am certainly open to not considering a five-year-old AFD to be especially binding, HOWEVER, nothing in the list of links you gave seems to be a reliable source. I don't see how this book meets our guidelines for inclusion of articles about books, but if you would like to open a deletion review, you are welcome to do so. --B (talk) 17:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

eliane reyes

I have placed the required references -Jmeden7 (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see Proposed deletion of biographies of living people for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion of a biography of a living person. I have removed the prod blp template, but because it was not deleted this is not the right page to ask for this! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Levy (reporter)

Marc Levy is notable journalist with AP out of Harrisburg, PA. I suspect part of the issue may be that his name was misspelled in the article. Its simple to find his tag line if you include his name along with "Associated Press" in typical web search. his recent article on AP are available here: http://ap-167.newsvine.com/ -98.247.34.65 (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done

File:David Allan Coe - Underground Album.jpg

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Underground Album. -Zundark (talk) 08:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gloria Scotti

reasoning -208.120.253.99 (talk) 04:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Egypt's Got Talents

reasoning -G.S. Soliman (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The page is NOT of a company or an organization or any kind of a profitable activity .. it's a successful reform attempt (evidently celebrated by some news media ) lead by volunteers and the article does not promote for anything.. it's just a hint on the event that aims at discovering and fostering Egyptian talents in all fields. This is not a promoting-business page it a note of reform attempt needed after years of corruption in Egypt.

Please reconsider the deletion of this page.. thank you G.S. Soliman (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Poetess

The Poetess is a legit person and veteran rapper and radio personality. This is a viable resource for fans and media to get information on her. -Ogpoetess (talk) 20:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Michig (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. What the article needs is references to confirm what it says and establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Team Exile 5

Team Exile 5 is an esports comminity. I dont understand why this page has been proposled for deletion. Please help us understand why the page has been deleted? Sam. -Kung Fu Master (talk) 08:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted for "No explanation of the subject's significance". The basic criteria here is that independent writings exist on the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IPE Global, again

The article is about a legitimate organization that has been undertaking various projects in the development sector of Health,Education,Rural development ,urban development across the globe, thereby making difference in the development globally.The said organization has also worked with international clients and donors like UNICEF,Asian Development Bank, World Bank in development sector projects to change the existing situation and bring about a difference. -Preethi31 (talk) 09:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - it may be a legitimate and worthy organization, but Wikipedia is not a business listing directory, and IPE Global has not been shown to meet the notability requirement. See also my reply at User talk:JohnCD#IPE Global. JohnCD (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:International School Peninsula-logo.gif

This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in International School of the Peninsula. -Zundark (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ateret Yerushalayim

The page was deleted with the stated reason being "Non-notable Yeshiva program, not clear if it's part of another Yeshiva or independent. Location can't be found in 3rd party sources.".

I have to object to this because Ateret Yerushalayim, otherwise known as AJ, is an independent program, having no affiliations with any other Yeshivas or programs. Furthermore, it is just as 'notable' as several other Yeshivas that have their own Wikipedia pages, such as Eretz HaTzvi, Lev Hatorah, Netiv Aryeh etc.

Furthermore, I'm fairly sure I provided a link to the Yeshiva's (active) websites (http://ajstaff.posterous.com/ ; http://ateret.org/photos/index.php) which should qualify as a 3rd party sources. Ezzi386 (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC) -Ezzi386 (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question ... how would either of those two websites be considered to be third party, reliable sources when they appear to be directly associated with the subject? I mean, ateret.org is their own website, right? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A fair point. See the below three 3rd party websites that should qualify as both independent, and reliable: http://www.masaisrael.org/Masa/English/Programs/Yeshivat+Ateret+Yerushalayim.htm http://findayeshiva.org/Yeshiva7_Ateret-Yerushalayim-Jerusalem-Eretz-Yisroel.aspx http://www.yu.edu/cjf/israel_yeshivot/page1.aspx?id=15888 Let me know if anything else is needed to undelete. Ezzi386 (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
None of these still meet the definition of reliable source? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terrance Graven

OTRS permission received from website owner in ticket 2011071710009382 for content at http://terrancegraven.com/bio.html and http://terrancegraven.com/statement.html under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 and GFDL licenses. I am listed at m:OTRS/personnel. – Adrignola talk 13:30, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nate Fowler

Nate Fowler is an award winning songwriter. Winning a Gospel Music Association award for song of 2010 for the whole association. He will also be signing a record deal very soon. Along with multiple TV and Film placements for his music. -Natefowlermusic (talk) 19:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Henry League

I would like to see what information was originally included in the article. Link to this deleted wikipedia entry found at http://www.encyclo.co.uk/define/Patrick%20Henry%20League. As far as I can tell was originally deleted by a single individual's request uncontested. -66.72.215.225 (talk) 22:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Freedman MD

reasoning -Dtjensen (talk) 03:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Toby Freedman is my best friend of 50 years. His wife, Carol, and daughter, Andrea, have provided the material I placed on Wikipedia on Sunday, July 10, 2011 for everyone to enjoy about the life and times of Toby, who was a giant in history. Dale jensen

Institute for Safe Medication Practices

The article was nominated for Speedy Deletion for not saying why the organization was notable, a position I disagree with since the organization has been referenced on a number of Wikipedia pages. It was then deleted before I had a chance to respond. Since the page history and talk page are also gone, do not know how to find out who deleted it so that I could discuss the matter with that person. Please restore it in my user space, so that I can provide more information as requested and then repost it. -Cherlin (talk) 05:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David S. Rose

The page was a legitimate, fully-sourced, verifiable, biographical page about a notable living person, which had been uncontroversially in place for quite some time. This appears to be a personal vendetta between the subject and person who proposed it for deletion, and I am not aware of any discussion on the article's talk page about the deletion other than the proposer's. I generally monitor pages in this domain area, but hadn't checked this particular one in a while, so I missed the proposal. In addition, checking the current page under the heading "David S. Rose" appears to show that a user account (Barsoom1988) was created for the sole purpose of redirecting the link from the original article, which seems rather suspicious. -Yorker (talk) 05:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(I'm giving the submitter a chance to edit the above and make valid arguments without unproven accusations before actionning this piece of WP:PUFFERY) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, Barsoom1988's sole edit was to create the page as a redirect to David Stuart Rose after the David S. Rose article had been deleted. – Athaenara ✉ 07:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Božo Skoko

No reasoning given. -Zrinski hr (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC) I apologize, i didn't read the proposed deletion message. Božo Skoko is a leading croatian professor of public relations & political communication at the University of Zagreb and published many articles and some books on PR in Croatia. I will set two independent sources to his work & biography. Biography: http://medjunarodne-studije-hums.hr/en/who-is-who-i-cis/boo-skoko Books: http://www.novelti.com.hr/en/books/ http://www.matis.hr/eng/vijesti_ostalo.php?id=2044&next=OK&year=2011&today=3&month=1&lang=en http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=35999&lang=en --Zrinski hr (talk) 09:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: How do you respond to the references showing he's a research assistant, and not a professor? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He was research asistant until 2009, since then he is a assistant professor (docent) at the of Political Science in Zagreb (Website: http://www.fpzg.unizg.hr/ Biography in croatian: http://www.fpzg.unizg.hr/oFakultetu/stranicePredavaca/skoko_bozo.htm)- the english page is no longer current). See also biography on his homepage in english: http://www.bozoskoko.com/en/biography/ or his works on the Croatian scientific bibliography CROSBI http://bib.irb.hr/lista-radova?autor=262602
Please read my proposal of the new article of "Božo Skoko" which I edit on my user page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zrinski_hr --Zrinski hr (talk) 13:07, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Burgess american embalmer/funeral director

reasoning -Mississippikid (talk) 11:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reference for verification is "International Conference of Funeral Servic Examining Board".

Brass-A-Holics

reasoning -


My article was deleted because of alleged copyright infringement. There was no copyright infringement; I wrote the biography found on the website (www.brass-a-holics.com) I have full permission to use the information for the Wikipedia page from the Brass-A-Holics; I created the pages for them as apart of my social media duties. Please reinstate my page. I do not know who deleted it, nor do I know how to reach that individual. Please reinstate my page.

Kari Baltimore Brass-A-Holics (Redacted) KBaltimore01 (talk) 16:17, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done The article was deleted because of notability. Of course, copyright would still be an issues because you would therefore be giving Wikipedia full rights over the text. You would need to submit a request under WP:OTRS. That said, the notability is clearly not established, which is key. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:25, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

George Borowski

The article concerning George Borowski was deleted around the 18th May 2011 for the reasons that George Borowski apparently claimed to be 'Guitar George' from the Dire Straits song, Sultans of Swing. This is untrue, as George Borowski has never claimed to be 'The Guitar George', but the page was of interest to a lot of people who like to keep updated as to the ongoing debate. George Borowski is a great Manchester legend, and if the only reason for the deletion of his page was the unsubstansiated claim of him to be 'Guitar George', then just remove that small part of the article, instead of terminating the entire thing. George Borowski's life and legacy does not just revolve around the myth of 'Guitar George'. He has worked with many famed artists and bands, as well as being a successful singer/songwriter in his own right, and his information deserves to be readily available for the people who wish to read it. -92.12.224.53 (talk) 16:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Borowski, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:13, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Young (actor)

He is an actor in the cult SciFi show The Tomorrow People and in other series and movies. This page is linked to from multiple articles. Looks like the article was deleted because of notability, but he should fall in the cult status explanation on the notability page. -Hiram (talk) 18:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get the original page back to use as a starting point, or at least see what it was prior to deletion? Hiram (talk) 03:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to the incubator. Once sourced it can be moved back into article space. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:35, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orhan Cem Çetin

Notable Turkish photographer; referenced in anthologies and books on history of photography in Turkey; among the pioneers of conceptual photography in Turkey; exhibitied and known internationally -Queen zenobia (talk) 20:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The article's only references were to Çetin's website and his blog. A Wikipedia article would need to establish notability by references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources - see also WP:CREATIVE. If you think you can do that, reply below here, and I will userfy the article - move it into your user space - where you can work on it. JohnCD (talk) 10:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. Please do that so that I can improve the article. Many thanks. Queen zenobia (talk) 13:31, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Noreen Khan-Mayberry

Dr. Noreen Khan-Mayberry is the first female to serve as a NASA space toxicologist. There are only 7 space toxicologists in the world and Dr. Khan-Mayberry is also the only minority to work as a NASA employed federal toxicologist. There are very few female scientists of note in spaceflight and Dr. Khan-Mayberry has made history by introducing the speciality of Space Toxicology to the greater Toxicology scientific field. Dr. Khan-Mayberry was asked to author the first book chapter on the speciality of Space Toxicology in an international peer-reviewed toxicology textbook. She has more accolades and her page is adheres to wiki guidelines unlike the majority of pages listed under the category NASA Personnel. Her page should be restored. -Planetaryspace (talk) 02:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Konopasek

reasoning -68.227.126.79 (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Konopasek, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Courcelles (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=440481007"