Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Leeboy100 (talk | contribs) at 21:00, 29 December 2012 (Requesting semi-protection of Discovery Kids on NBC. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit


    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Someone has repeatedly vandalized several articles, including this one. Leeboy100 21:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ₮๒Я∆и∂ﾚ∑ㄚ 18:38, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Widr (talk) 18:10, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 Days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Best, Mifter (talk) 18:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated information about a purchasable release on December 16 in France is being added yet after numerous comments in the edit summary about this being checked the information given is not in the references provided. IPs mainly. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 18:09, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Constant disruptive and quite illiterate edits by anonymous IP user(s), which turn the page into a tabloid. Please, protect the page, I am tired of reediting it and "cleaning" it up. Thank you. MarizzaRojas (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2012 (GMT+1)

    Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Although sources are provided for almost every word, another editor is hammering on copyvio and lack of sources. Discussion is taking place at User talk:Kevin McE#Pecker Dunne The Banner talk 17:33, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Constant vandalism/disruptive edits by anonymous IP user(s). Allowing this to continue harms the reputation of Wikipedia as a legitimate source of information.Spylab (talk) 15:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 17:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: recent and persistent edits made which are contrary to fact have been made based on the release of archives by the British government. Please protect for a period of one month to allow for the newly released documents to be talked about and also to allow the heat to die down in the article. Sport and politics (talk) 14:01, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent IP vandalism – IP will not stop. Please, protect this article! Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 12:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 17:37, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip will not stop. Protect the article!. WhiteWriterspeaks 11:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Three different new IP's declared person dead in last two days, while no references are available yet, so I reverted and left an informing message at their pages. I also added a message at article's talk page. I presume the statement is right looking at his age, but according BLP policy we cannot accept this until obituaries are available. SchreyP (messages) 08:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Pending changes protection: Persistent IP vandalism and plagiarism. //Gbern3 (talk) 06:58, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. ·Add§hore· Talk To Me! 17:30, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Please limit to autoconfirmed users; SPI has been opened for the accounts that have edited the AFD. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. after temporary semi protection for 3 times the change in figures and removal of content still occurs. Anidemun (talk) 09:39, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Sigh, very minimal use of edit summaries. Hurts my eyes. MikeLynch (talk) 11:51, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism by IP's and sock accounts.

    One particular sockmaster, ChronicalUsual keeps coming back every other month to vandalize. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ChronicalUsual/Archive http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/GraceMoney

    Many disruptive Ips as well, such as just recently.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3A71.178.201.4

    The Syrian civil war is a main page article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page and is considered a controversial article. As such it is common to vandalized such as in this method yesterday http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Syrian_civil_war&diff=530099596&oldid=530058834

    Sopher99 (talk) 19:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Please see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive for a rolling archive of the last 7 days of protection requests.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=530349821"