Jump to content

User talk:SwisterTwister

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by M.Renae (talk | contribs) at 20:39, 6 January 2017. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

SEMI-RETIRED
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.


    Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).

    PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.

    New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

    Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube
    Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #264

    Hi SwisterTwister. I have received a rejection on a page submission but a fellow football team who do exactly the same thing have a page that's been approved which is this one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hashtag_United_F.C. They have even quoted us in it under their history and the game between both teams is set to go live this Sunday 8th January. The reason this page was declined was because of the following "Still not significant to satisfy our footballers notability especially since they're not part of the highest major leagues" This comes down to an opinion and the viewing figures match those of major leagues on TV. Palmers FC YouTube channel is more subscribed than every Football League Club and has more subscribers than over half of the premier league teams combined. Because they're not notable players who are being paid they are still role models and continue to gain attention from traditional media. lf you please tell me what it is lacking exactly against the HashTag United page that'll be great? Many thanks Steveballem (talk) 19:31, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Channels news 3 is not his website, Jamsphere is not his website, tatepublishingnews is not also his website. please consider this, because they all featured him. Angela001 (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    Hi SwisterTwister, I received the reason for rejection, ok how do I make it better. I feel this person should be part of Wikipedia, so how can I get it approved. I am not an expert in Wikipedia terms, requirements so I'm asking your assistance to get it published. Thanks, ronon44

    Hi SwisterTwister, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronon44 (talk • contribs) 00:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm sorry to see you comment, but respect your opinion. You seemed a little upset based on the word choice, I hope you are feeling well. Anyway I was hoping you could help improve my article with some critique- Firstly, I believe any company that acquires 65% of one of the major telecommunication companies is worth note, not to mention the countless controversies. But, hey, I'll keep digging and asking if it'll help. Secondly, and more importantly, I would appreciate clarity on your belief that my article is a "PR" material. All these are objective facts, I attempted to be as unbiased as possible, hence the controversy section. I am not a representative of Credico, but only attempt to give the public the proper information on a company which has had a profound impact, negative and positive, on many people's lives. As a final note, on a personal note, I can not help but feel your close attention to my article and critique reflects some kind of bias on you part. Once again the previous statement was simply a personal opinion. I hope for all the best, Ill keep working on it!

    Thanks, Elijah — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ekay514 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi SwisterTwister! I've updated the citations and references for the George Town Festival page.

    It now cites The New York Times and The Straits Times. Please have another look. Thank you kindly!

    Caritech (talk) 22:38, 12 December 2016

    -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caritech (talk • contribs) 14:36, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi SwisterTwister,

    Thank you for taking the time to make notes on my article creation. I took your advice and researched each articles details such as the articles author and other details and was able to fill in a lot more information for each source. All the best! Ruman826 Runman826 (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Dear Swister Twister

    Khabargozari mehr (talk)Thank you a lot for reviewing my article, for the article navid faridi i think the problem is that we have persian sources in iran and that may be seem not verifiable enough, but i added the iran football federation letter and other source which may help please review and please advise best regards khabargozari mehr

    Hi, i am omrr's PR manager, thank you for your comment, i added his latest interview to the references, please take a look if now it's acceptable. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.45.204.133 (talk) 21:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, thank you for your feedback, Ma3azef.com, Cairoscene.com, Madamasr.com are among the top news and media destinations in the middle east and Cairo. If you don't see them as notable independent news destinations then i don't see these articles ever accepted. Because when it comes to this region of the world. This is the best coverage anyone could have. Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.45.204.133 (talk) 22:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello Twistedsister You seem to have taken a negative view of the ATMIA page. It is NOT solely based on PR notes. Two other editors also had look and I did diversify away from atmmarketplace and finextra. So I think you are being overly jelous in marking the page for deletion.19:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CIM2014 (talk • contribs)


    Hi swisyertwiter, Thank you so much for going through my draft, I am Adrija Gupta's manger and handling her digital too, taking your feedback I have now added news article published by economic times and IMDb links too, please go through when you can and let me know ...regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adrijagupta (talk • contribs) 23:05, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    speedy deletion of Dominick Lazarra

    1. My post was made into a draft by another admin to give me a chance to repair it.

    2. It's not copyright infringement when you own the material — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrianRFSU (talk • contribs) 23:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    As promised

    The soft bunny of happiness and tranquility.

    Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for your suggestion on Draft:MiniTool & Requesting to Review the changes

    Hi SwisterTwister, Thanks for your suggestion, I have added the resouce from GOOGLE NEWS and highbeam as your suggestion,

    Also I want to know that what can I do to get my submitted Article accepted soon, as its taking so much time,I posted this around 20 days ago but its still waiting for review. --Keybord-Man (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:42, 8 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakka Americans

    ST, I'm a bit curious about this. Shouldn't this have been closed as a "no-consensus" rather than a clear keep? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 07:31, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    The basis overall was to keep though, it would have been NC had there been equal amounts of delete. SwisterTwister talk 15:21, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm a bit curious about this ST. I'm not sure about the equal "keep" and "delete" reasoning. A redirection is essentially a kind of deletion - it is proposed more as an alternative to deletion. A similar one Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hokkien and Hoklo Americans was closed as NC. If you don't mind, could you reclose this as NC? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:54, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
    Thanks for reviewing my article Legend Cinema, request you to suggest best practices to make it better. Contibutions are invited too :) Thank you. NutJob12 (talk) 16:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
    Thank YOU, ThanK YOU, THanK YOU, THANK YOU! for reviewing my article KRKW-LP !!! I kindly request you to suggest best practices to make it better. Contibutions are invited too :)

    Thank you once again. (Grovel, grovel, grovel.) GeorgeV73GT

    01:36:02, 2 September 2016 review of submission by Mothrbrain


    Hi there, just wanted to say thanks first and foremost for your review and for your feedback. I've taken it on board and significantly expanded the third-party criticism and sources section, adding just what was requested to the point that it is now the longest section in the article. Hopefully that should satisfy the reviewer. If it's possible to proceed with the re-review, I'd be grateful. Thank you!

    Request on 16:38:12, 2 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Jhannafin


    Hi! Looking for help on why this page keeps getting rejected. The page I created for indie director and writer Logan Sandler's first feature film, Live Cargo, was accepted. All the sources I use in Logan Sandler's page are independent from the artist himself. What is lacking in notability? Thanks!

    Jhannafin (talk) 16:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    20:14:49, 2 September 2016 review of submission by 92.238.62.98


    I am requesting a review as the source material is unavailable online from an independent source. The only existing material is a scan from a newspaper article taken from the subject's own website. I have outlined where the original article was first published but all attempts to verify it from an independent source have met dead ends. Please advise on the exact steps needed to get this article approved. I appreciate your help with this matter. I look forward to your response. 92.238.62.98 (talk) 20:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    92.238.62.98, perhaps I can help out here. The simplest way to put it is that, based on the available sources, he is just not yet notable. There is no real chance of an article until his performances or recording have been reviewed in major publications of national reputation. ' DGG ( talk ) 07:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    The prediction...

    ... absolutely nothing will happen on Julius Gbabojor Pondi and the substandard article will stay forever. The Banner talk 20:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    call for help

    hay swister, i called for help because, as i said its way too late for me to be editing. additionally i'm not planning on doing any editing just now but don't want to leave this article. i've a neuro disorder & not real confident with my old & barely functioning computer. i simply don't want to spend 3 hours trying to delete a sentence only to get scolded. & yes, it can take me 3 hours. so i wanted a second opinion. its disheartening to think someone has responded to find that i've been told to ask my question somewhere else. i have done some reading & added more info at the treahouse. if you're able to help, thnx in advance.Mausbug (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Help for creating page

    Hello dear,

    I have just this information for Ermine(Organisation) which is:-


    "Ermine is a British educational management organisation.

    Ermine's Motto: δῶς μοι πᾶ στῶ καὶ τὰν γᾶν κινάσω

    It is distinguished affiliate of The Pimley Foundation, UK and also the Institutional member of the College of Teachers, UK and abides by their Code of Professional Practice.

    It has been founded by Mr. Colin Wrigley, MBE and Lt. Col. The Hon. Osborne Wrigley-Pimley-McKerr III.

    Ermine Owns and manages Pimley School, Austrey School and Albert Polytechnic."

    Please help me for creating Ermine's wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aopsermine (talk • contribs) 06:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    19:24:36, 6 September 2016 review of submission by Jackguitarfan


    Dear SwisterTwister I have made the corrections you suggested. Could you please review them and allow me to resubmit this for approval.

    Thank you, Jackguitarfan (talk) 19:24, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Aaron Chang Draft Update

    Hi SwisterTwister! I did as you suggested and kept digging for more notable references for Aaron Chang, and I found out that he is indeed featured in a permanent exhibit in a museum! The bathing suit from his clothing line, Aaron Chang Clothing, that he gave as a gift to Bethany Hamilton, famous surfer and shark attack survivor, is featured in the exhibit titled Courageous Inspiration: Bethany Hamilton at the California Surf Museum. So this totals 3 exhibits, 1 permanent, and 1 art critic review of one of his galleries, along with multiple other references including his entry in the Encyclopedia of Surfing. I also found the article on Forbes about him, but I don't think it has relevant info to add to the Wikipedia page specifically, so I just included it as an addition. Could you take a look at the draft and see if you consider him notable now that I've added the new info?

    Thanks! Explorethatstore (talk) 22:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Susan Hawk (district attorney)

    Susan Hawk resigned as district attorney today. Should her Wiki article name be changed to "Susan Hawk (attorney)" or "Susan Hawk (politician)"? 208.44.84.138 (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:Amili1313

    I note your comment on the above. There still seems to be an issue, wondered if you could take a look? Thanks. Paste Let’s have a chat. 12:25, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    17:57:20, 7 September 2016 review of submission by Sbjumper21


    Hi SwisterTwister,

    I understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines but wanted to present the below argument on why our references should be considered significant, given that a competitor of ours, GolfNow, has been granted a Wikipedia page.

    Within the golf industry, the biggest golf publication has under one million unique visitors a month. We've been covered and interviewed by major publications such as The Examiner (2.5 million unique visitors a month), USA Today affiliate, Argus Leader (120K+ unique visitors per month), Dujour Magazine (47K+ unique visitors a month), GolfNewsNet (55k+ unique visitors a month), ESPN Radio, CBS Radio, Golf Channel Sirius FM and Golf Channel (video). These are major hits within the golf industry, but they aren't going to be covered by the Huffington Post/Forbes, which I believe what Wikipedia is looking for. The Huffington Post also mostly covers the professional game and lacks golf technology coverage.

    Lastly, I wanted to mention that a majority of the coverage that GolfNow received from major publications (Forbes/GolfWeek - no longer active/Business Insider) was about either their competition with a slight mention to GolfNow or acquisition by Comcast. They have no coverage other than that in major publications. Their Forbes piece was focused on EZLinks and had some mentions of GolfNow being a competitor.

    Comcast Buying GolfNow.com: http://www.businessinsider.com/2008/3/comcast-buying-golfnow-com Booking Golf Tee Times Gradually Shifting To Online Marketplace (focused on EZLinks): http://www.forbes.com/sites/darrenheitner/2013/06/15/booking-golf-tee-times-gradually-shifting-to-online-marketplace/#cbbf061646e1

    I'm hoping to discuss this further, and I would be happy to jump on the phone and explain this further. Let me know if you need any further info.

    Thanks Sbjumper21 (talk) 17:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    About Victor Anoul

    I just edited a draft you accepted on August 30th, Victor Anoul, and I just wanted to give you some unsolicited bits of advice, if you don't mind. I'll try to make this as painless as possible.

    1. Always fill out the living= parameter of {{Wikiproject Biography}}. As a specific example, if the person isn't living, put in living=no. This reduces the workload on people like myself who go through Category:Biography articles without living parameter, and also helps us keep track of how many BLPs we have.
    2. Biographies have to have more information than non-biographical articles to not be considered stubs.
    3. If someone isn't alive, make sure categories like Category:Living people and Category:Date of birth missing (living people) aren't on the article.

    Thanks in advance,

     I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 08:25, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    02:54:33, 9 September 2016 review of submission by 221.237.112.154


    Question about short film drafts

    Hey, as you're a draft guru, I wanted to shoot you a query. I have a draft under development at Draft:Cul-de-Sac (2016 film), which concerns a brand new short film by an Oscar-winning film crew and a cast featuring an A-lister. Though I personally don't believe it is suitable for mainspace inclusion yet, I wanted to hear your thoughts for when it would be suitable. I anticipate it will win a vast multitude of awards and may even be an Oscar contender, so please give me input! I hope you're doing well! :) DARTHBOTTO talk•cont 21:57, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Partial AN/I close on ibans

    Hi SwisterTwister, I have closed this section of the ongoing AN/I discussion with the following warning:

    User:SwisterTwister is prohibited from trying to impose "interaction bans" or "keep-away orders" against other users, and from implying that such interaction bans exist unless a ban has been formally enacted through a community process. This does not apply to requests that users not post on SwisterTwister's user talk page (see WP:NOBAN). Violations of this will result in temporary but escalating blocks.

    If you need any clarification or have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me personally. While reading the comments there I got the impression that there were editors "in your corner" who want you to succeed, but who couldn't support you saying that bans exist when they don't. Best of luck in your editing, and I hope you have some less-stressful times ahead of you. ~Awilley (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rupak_Kulkarni

    Can you please check below request ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiuser music (talk • contribs) 01:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Dear SwisterTwister,

    Thanks for reviewing my article.

    I need your help to understand why my article does not match the notability criteria. I have given the reference link from below

    1. References of books where his name is mentioned. 2. Reference of news papers where he was in focus. 3. Reference of his all international concerts is also given. 4. Also note that achieving "Pandit" title itself is greatest achievement in Indian Music. 5. His name is also referred in other Wikipedia articles but I understand this does not match to your criteria. 6. Wikipedia also has database of flue players which are less notable than him in terms of achievement. but I understand I can not use this as a argument to publish the article as per Wikipedia guidelines.

    Please let me know what exactly I have to do to proceed with my article. I found your comments are very useful and helpful in many other articles. So looking for your help in fixing errors in my article.

    Looking forward for your reply and help.

    Best regards, Amit Wikiuser music (talk) 15:18, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Could you take a look?

    Hi SwisterTwister, I reached out to Sh33na, who recommended I contact you. I'm new to wikipedia and found Sh33na's name as an editor on the Duodenal Switch page - as someone who had the DS, I'm curious to help edit medical articles too. I just got my start with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Surgical_Care_Affiliates and was wondering if you could check out my work? I would really appreciate it. Thanks so much!! --Lisacatherine (talk) 03:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Nomination of Gala Wilton F.C. for deletion

    A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gala Wilton F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

    The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gala Wilton F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

    Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joe Roe (talk) 12:33, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Software MacKiev prod

    Hello SwisterTwister, I'm informing you that an article you nominated for proposed deletion, Software MacKiev, has been restored as another editor contested the deletion via PROD. Please feel free to offer your input at the AfD discussion if you wish to do so. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:38, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Article for review Rattan1912 (talk) 03:51, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

    Just re-posting for review

    Hi David,

    How is it going? Rattan here again. Can you please review this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:1-day.co.nz for me? This is one of the very popular online shopping website of New Zealand based on daily deals concept. Let me know what changes need to happen in order to get this approved. I hope the references from news websites would be enough for notability.

    Regards, Rattan

    22:43:19, 14 September 2016 review of submission by 2600:1012:B04E:C7D4:7C28:B3C4:2D98:5368



    Hi there,

    Thank you for reviewing my submission but I do not accept this. Jihan is first and foremost a proven notable artist, and designer. Her balloon designs have sparked many companies all over to copycat her. Her company Geronimo has now become a coined term for her particular balloon design as well. If you google Geronimo Balloons you will not only find her company but also a multitude of online stores selling "Geronimo balloons", not on behalf of Jihan's company but as the style of balloon. I am happy to add more references to support her and her companies notability but if that is not enough would you suggest I develop a page for the company with a section on the creator that is Jihan instead? I do not believe her talent is not acceptable under Wikipedia Standards.


    2600:1012:B04E:C7D4:7C28:B3C4:2D98:5368 (talk) 22:43, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks

    Thanks for your help with Kai-Tai Fang. 162.250.169.162 (talk) 09:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Gregory Bernard

    Hello SwisterTwister :) Thanks for reviewing my article. You said that there was nothing to suggest the GB's independent notability - please can I just confirm what you need to resolve this? I submitted a couple of interviews with him around film's he's directed, is it that you need something that is not film-related or something that is in relation to him in general and not just one thing? How about this? http://www.bleedingcool.com/2011/04/12/on-rubber-wrong-and-reality-producer-gregory-bernard-discusses-working-with-quentin-dupieux/ Thanks very much for your help LittleGold (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Recent article

    Hi I was Curious why the article I posted was not accepted. There were no notes written on it. Sports0516 (talk) 21:54, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    About Rashad Bukhash

    Thank you for reviewing the article, your comments are well noted, wikipedia source has been removed and more citations and references were added as well, thank you for your support. Laithabdallah (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Please Reconsider: Durreen Shahnaz

    Eddie Hartman (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Durreen Shahnaz, whom you rejected for lack of notability, won the Asia Game Changer award today: http://asiasociety.org/asia-game-changers/durreen-shahnaz[reply]

    Would you please give me some indication of what would stack up to notability?

    Request on 15:02:17, 17 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Hrosato


    Please provide more specificity as to why the article about Theresia Gouw was declined for lack of notability backed up by significant sources. Theresia Gouw is widely considered one of the leading venture capital investors in the technology industry. In an industry with few female investors at all, she is a standout regardless of her gender. The sources used in this article are highly reliable--New York Times, Fortune, Forbes, CNBC, Time, etc. There are other Wikipedia pages about similar people in the tech industry--Aileen Lee (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aileen_Lee), Diane Greene (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Greene). Please provide some insight as to how these profiles meet the notability standard whereas Theresia Gouw's does not. I appreciate any specific guidance you can provide. Thank you!

    Hrosato (talk) 15:02, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 18:36:37, 17 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Ekay514



    Ekay514 (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello David, I would first like to thank you for taking the time to review my article. With that being said, I'm finding it difficult to believe that the information provided does not sufficiently account for Credico's notability. It's, of course mentioned in the article, but in terms of its size and controversy, Credico is a 400 firm company, spanning 19 countries, with a current class action involving hundreds of opt ins, and an extreme level of notoriety in the UK. Aside from this I believe, I believe the article is rather unbiased and factual. As a point of reference, the Cobra Group, a direct marketing firm of almost identical construction, save its East Asian base of operations, achieved publication and its size and controversy were not really as notable from an objective point of view. Again thank you for your review, but I feel you are have a difficult time understanding the scope and influence of the company.

    Thanks! Elijah Kay Ekay514 (talk) 18:36, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 00:15:17, 18 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Mek457


    Hello David. Thank you for your review of my piece on Daniel Noah. I know you receive this question all the time, but I would appreciate some advice. Respectfully, you say Mr. Noah is not notable enough to receive his own Wikipedia entry, yet the movie (Max Rose) he created, wrote, and directed has its own page, and the company (SpectreVision) he co-founded has its own page as well. I am truly at a loss as to why Daniel is not deemed worthy enough as the projects he created. I would truly appreciate it if you could share the thought behind this, and if there is a way for me to revise that might make you reconsider. Sincere thanks, Michael.Mek457 (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Mek457 (talk) 00:15, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Review of ThreatModeler page

    ST,

    Please note that the section entitled "Additional Outside References to ThreatModeler" does, in fact, contain a press release. It is mostly filled with outside/non-related mentions of ThreatModeler from verifiable secondary and tertiary sources. Overall there are 21 references used in the article, 15 of which are outside / verifiable / notable sources. I was in the process of making the links in the "Additional Outside References to ThreatModeler" live when I received notification that the article was declined. Since you didn't notice the press release about ThreatModeler or notice that the article was about Argawal's contribution to threat modeling, I am resubmitting in the hope that you will actually take time to review the article and its references. This is not, as you suggest, an advertisement. It is an article about moving the field of threat modeling forward. If you have specific, helpful comments I would be very happy to receive them; the general template comments I've received thus far simply do not seem to apply in a helpful way....

    Thanks Bbeyst (talk) 18:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Brian[reply]


    Thanks for the specific input. I'll see what I can do to address the noted issues in a timely manner. Bbeyst (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Review of Draft:QForm page

    Hello Dear, You have declined the article i've prepared with the comment "the company is not yet notable because there's simply not yet enough substance for a convincing notability". But in fact, the page isn't about company, it is about one of the mostly used FEM (CAE) software on the plants around the world. So, please, put me on the way i should edit the article so it could be published. Thanks a lot, have a nice time. Mskpetrov (talk) 08:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 10:27:13, 19 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Slim cop


    Hi - I'm struggling to understand what else I need to do in order to have this article approved. You say "For the best enhancements, this would still need all [sic] additional amounts of in-depth third-party news sources overall which also includes reviews; please no press releases, interviews or trivial passing mentions." Yet I have included citations from Time Out, The BBC, The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Spectator, and the Evening Standard - are these not "third-party news sources"? As for reviews, the word 'review' appears six times amongst the citations! So please, can you tell me clearly and specifically what more I need to do to get this article published?

    Thanks.

    simontcope (talk) 10:27, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    15:36:52, 19 September 2016 review of submission by Matt Secord


    Hi SwisterTwister, I just wanted to reach out and get a bit of clarity on why the Draft was rejected based on notability. I added a lot of very credible references (Wall Street Journal, Barron's, Reuters, New York Times, etc.) throughout the Draft to help solidify Rafay's notability, also, added extra references at the bottom. Thanks!

    23:21:17, 19 September 2016 review of submission by Pollyst


    hi, this page was modeled somewhat after Marketo's, and we did include several reputable third party references to the info. So, just trying to understand the rejection, aka why this is not noteworthy/credible, while that of Marketo and other tech firms is...thanks for the help. Pollyst (talk) 23:22, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Justice Zakaullah Lodhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BRILL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    13:25:19, 20 September 2016 review of submission by PriyankaD


    Hi David,

    I would need your serious support here cause I am unable to understand which links are referred as press releases. The article tone is also very neutral and shares only information about the developer. Can you help me understand which statement is referred as a advertisement.

    Also, all the references shared are news articles released by respective publisher and is not a PR. Can you highlight which references are considered as PR.

    Further, I was checking few other developer articles to understand what wrong I am doing and was suprised to see a similar article with less relevant references being approved. You can view the same here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acme_Group#

    It would really grateful, if you can share exact changes required. PriyankaD (talk) 13:25, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    15:31:23, 20 September 2016 review of submission by Brafordrm



    Hey there! Can you help me? I tried to resubmit my article and I'm not sure if it went through.

    Request on 18:24:44, 20 September 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by JTNwriter

    , since you are certainly a reliable editor, I have moved it to Draft:ntertrust Technologies Corporation for improvement. DGG ( talk ) 18:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request for Huawei Honor article

    Resolved

    Greetings! Since you implemented my Harry Jackson (artist) article at AfC, I thought I'd see if you were available to review my edit request to implement an expanded and updated Huawei Honor draft. I submitted a request a while back, and I've pinged several people for help, but there must be more editors reviewing AfC drafts than edit requests. If you are willing to help, you can view my edit request at Talk:Huawei Honor. Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 19:03, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This edit request has been answered. Happy New Year! Inkian Jason (talk) 16:04, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Paul Massey Submission

    Hi...What would you recommend changing in order to get the Paul Massey wikipedia page approved? I appreciate your feedback and would like to know what overarching changes I can implement to the page to ensure its success? Mr. Massey certainly has a notable business career, that I am sure of and can back that fact up with any and all citations needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Af398 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Elena Taube Bailey

    Hi, is there a reason you replaced the speedy deletion nomination on this page with a PROD? Brycehughes (talk) 00:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Brycehughes There were claims of significance in the article enough to not quality for WP:A7. Also, because of its size, PROD was fitting to explain the exact concerns. SwisterTwister talk 00:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Given that the deletion has already been contested twice, wouldn't it be better to go through WP:AFD instead? Happy to nom there if you agree. Brycehughes (talk) 00:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Simply a contesting is still not taking away eligibility if the speedy or PROD still applies; in this case, the speedy was still placed and not removed (until I had) so it was not formally contested by that author. Also, as for the PROD, AfD is the next option if the article is unsuccessfully deleted by PROD.
    I think you're missing the spirit of the deletion process (obviously one of them would have deleted the template if I had PROD'd it and they understood that fact), but sure, no rush, I'll wait and see if they remove it. All the best, Brycehughes (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Fyi I went ahead and AFD'd this since PROD was removed. Brycehughes (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 07:12:20, 16 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by 42.104.104.245


    Hi Could you please help me create this page for The Iconic School. What do I do to create this page? Did the website not link up properly?


    42.104.104.245 (talk) 07:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Re my Sharon Pincott draft

    Hi, I just sent this below to Huon (asking him to forward to you), since I couldn't work out how to get to where I am right now. (Apologies)

    Now that I'm (finally) here, I'll copy in my message that I left with him:


    Hi Huon, I've been trying to send this update to SwisterTwister/WhirlingStorms, too, but I'm getting all confused. Could you possibly forward to him as well? Thank you.

    It's well after midnight where I am, and just wanted to ask if you could look at all those various 'External Links' that I've added, when you have abit of free time, to see if we're more on the right track now in terms of the 'independent reviews' (etc) that you need.

    Please note that I HAVEN'T yet edited the references (but I will).

    Also, I wanted to let you know that I've found out something that might help you think differently about the documentary (All the President's Elephants) credit to Pincott too (as opposed to just the film crew). The International Film Festival was organised (in conjunction with the UN and CITES as I've already written) "to raise global awareness of the various challenges facing the African and Asia elephants" ... and the judging panel were very high-level conservation people (eg Minister of Environment from South Africa, USA Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment, etc) - and so their focus wasn't 'technical' in terms of the filming. It was very much 'conservation' orientated and which films would best help global awareness. So I plan to expand the documentary paragraph a little bit to reflect this new info, if you agree it would be worthwhile? So that people can better understand why being a finalist reflects so well on Pincott too.

    Also, I've had advice from Pincott's publisher now too that they expect a 1,000+ word published article by a journalist to appear before Christmas, on Pincott/Elephant Dawn. So that sounds like what you're after too, so I will include that when they send me the link, which they've said they will do.

    Any input to all of this, I'd appreciate again. (Please do forward to SwisterTwister/WhirlingStorms too. Thanks again.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnie1000 (talk • contribs) 14:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Brpreater (talk) 14:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi Swister Twister,

    You recently rejected the page Draft:Davitt_Jones_Bould for lack of notability and I would be interested in any advice you could give me as to how this could be remedied.

    Is the issue more the depth of coverage or the sources themselves? The Lawyer and Legal Business, for example, are where you would generally go to read news about the UK legal industry, but would it be necessary to cite a national mainstream newspaper like the Guardian or Telegraph to establish notability?

    Do you think that the reported connection with The 2012 Olympics and the Sukuk bond (subjects which are themselves notable) supports the notability of the organisation or would much more be needed?

    My aim is not to advertise for Davitt Jones Bould but to create an informative factual article that would be of interest to readers concerned with the UK legal sector. There are a number of other articles about UK law firms and it is my opinion that Davitt Jones Bould is an important enough part of that subject area that readers would benefit from a Wikipedia entry.

    I would really appreciate any feedback on how you think the article could be made to conform with Wikipedia's guidelines.

    Sunstar Group

    Template:RestoredPROD - You may want to note that the article was approved at WP:AfC before you added your PROD Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    20:44:47, 16 December 2016 review of submission by Mcmlis


    Hello SwisterTwister, I'd like to thank you for your feedback on the article I wrote about M. Eduardo Padilla Silva. I have revised the article to include data that supports his noteworthiness as a Mexican business person, including his oversight of FEMSA as it became included on Global finance lists. I think these additions are still independent and keep the article reliable. Please let me know if you can review it again.

    20:45:56, 16 December 2016 review of submission by Mcmlis


    Hello SwisterTwister, I'd like to thank you for your feedback on the article I wrote about M. Eduardo Padilla Silva. I have revised the article to include data that supports his noteworthiness as a Mexican business person, including his oversight of FEMSA as it became included on Global finance lists. I think these additions are still independent and keep the article reliable. Please let me know if you can review it again. Mcmlis (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Mcmlis[reply]

    AfD for WriterDuet

    I am inviting you to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WriterDuet. I also used your reason from the PROD you attempted, as it was a perfect explanation.  {MordeKyle}  ☢ 23:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    06:06:51, 17 December 2016 review of submission by The Serenader


    Verifiable Sources

    This article states sources from The Star and The Jamaica Observer which are verifiable sources. I have used these sources before and I had no problem getting an approval. I started the Rvssian page on Wikipedia. It cites a lot of the above sources. Kindly review this again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Serenader (talk • contribs) 06:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Getting closer to finalising Sharon Pincott; for your review again please

    Hi again @SwisterTwister and @Huon, turns out we are now very pleased that you rejected the first draft of Sharon Pincott @SwisterTwister! After all of the input from you both and answers to questions, we think the text of the article is much stronger now overall, and certainly now we have more and better references/links too. Thank you both once again for all of the helpful advice and input.

    The article is still not 100% complete, but I think it is getting very close now. I am waiting on another one (and maybe two) substantial published reviews of Elephant Dawn, that are still expected out of South Africa and Australia (hopefully before Xmas or soon after). And we are still looking to see if there are any more relevant links that we can find.

    Please, could you have a read of the complete article again whenever you’re able (since it is worded quite differently now to the original submission that was declined) – plus with the extra links cleaned up and added (now separated between ‘Book reviews’ and ‘External Links’). And please let me know if you could, if you agree it’s nearing completion from the point of view of your own requirements, and soon ready for resubmission?

    Any additional input you have, I’d be very grateful. Arnie1000 (talk) 09:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    13:07:31, 17 December 2016 review of submission by Eaf92jj2


    Good morning SwisterTwister. Can you clarify what should be added or revised in order to get this submission approved? In looking at other wiki band pages, like this one (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Front_(band)) ; I tried to be even more thorough.

    Thank you for all of your help and guidance.

    AfD List of Surveillance Companies explanation

    Hello again, I left a message here before which seems to not be here anymore but I'd like to know why you deleted my list of surveillance companies and called it 'trivial'. These companies create technologies which governments use to spy on people and benefit from not having information about what they do online. To call such a list 'trivial' and have it deleted without proper discussion is something I find hard to understand and it's very offputting when editors do this kind of thing without engaging properly. Please can you engage with me on this discussion and give me some indication as to why you've made this decision. --Jwslubbock (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 15:38:56, 17 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Paramparaa



    Cinemawaali (talk) 15:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 16:36:58, 17 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by BritNSmithy


    Dear Sister Twister, Thank you for your feedback on the article submission. I have improved it by better explaining the origins and nature of the Harvard Business School case study on Cohen, which I believe in itself establishes her notability and in fact is what caught my eye. It was written independently by Harvard professors, vetted through the Harvard publishing system, and is available for purchase for business schools worldwide who use the material for students who study through the case method.

    The article also cites multiple reliable sources independent of the subject, with a reputation for fact checking and approval by editors, including Forbes, CNN, and two segments on the television show The Today Show. It also cites two awards given to Cohen by independent organizations Next Avenue and Forty Over 40.

    I hope these clarifications are sufficient. I welcome your help with any other changes you recommend to make the article acceptable.

    Respectfully yours, --BritNSmithy (talk) 16:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    BritNSmithy (talk) 16:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Self-submission!?

    What happens if I learnt how redirect a draft into an official article? I did with Hanna-Barbera Beyond, so I think I've messed up. This time, BIG. Fusionem (talk) 00:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Margo Ingham

    Many thanks for your review of my draft article on Margo Ingham. I see I need to find more references to prove her notability. I'll ask for some help with this. Her notability rests more in how she supported, promoted and encouraged other artists and gave them a platform, and helped to keep the cultural life and morale of Manchester alive during World War 2. Thanks again, I'll follow your leads. Hephzi (talk) 21:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    EM55555 (talk) 04:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC) Hi I have added verifiable reviews from magazines and newspapers from Italy, Denmark and the US. What do I need to change — Preceding unsigned comment added by EM55555 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC) EM55555 (talk) 04:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Second Rejection of Lorna Mary Swain entry

    Hello David/SwisterTwister,

    I've been attempting to create the Lorna Mary Swain entry for a class assignment. You have hard rejected it twice with little explanation besides a cut and paste of notability guidelines. Needless to say, I'm doing something wrong that isn't working with your view of the guidelines. I'm going to need a bit of help deciphering what exactly is going on to hold up this entry.

    The last update included additional sources, all of which are independent of the author who is deceased. It's evident that the woman is a noted scientist and women's education advocate.

    Thus, despite what I know is your attempt to help, it remains entirely unclear what is needed in order to make this woman notable. The fact that she was one of the earliest female lecturers at Cambridge isn't enough. Her publication history doesn't fit the notability criteria, and the fact that she's cited in more than one reputable work for her work on fluid dynamics in mathematics and being a woman in the UK who lent her skills to the war effort in World War I studying vibration problems in aircraft propellers (a significant early problem during the first world war; the first in which aircraft were used for terrain mapping/intelligence, scouting, and later fighting and bombing.

    Please advise as I am quite frustrated.

    Best,

    ChardonnayCharMargaux (talk) 05:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    07:26:02, 19 December 2016 review of submission by Jmor54


    I appreciate your help. I think I've got it into shape! :) I took the time to look at some other band Wiki's for reference, I got everything together, I added more info and relevant details, and I added some citations to the article itself. Let me know if it looks good! Thanks! Jmor54 (talk) 07:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Rejection of Kitron draft

    Hello, SwisterTwister. Regarding Kitron draft page, I would appreciate some clarification on notability criteria. Specifically, I would like to know why journalists's interviews with the company, published in major Luthuanian news portals, do not add to notability. I have found another example here: http://verslas.lrytas.lt/rinkos-pulsas/karine-technika-nato-pajegoms-gaminama-ir-kaune.htm Another article here, this time reporting about upcoming investors in Lithuanian market: http://ekonomika.tv3.lt/naujiena/keturi-uzsienio-investuotojai-i-lietuva-atnes-113-mln-litu-31261.html#ixzz2AJOWsdRq Both articles seem independent and noteworthy to me. Would they be appropriate to add, and if not, why not? Thanks! Zubzer0 (talk) 09:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    14:30:01, 19 December 2016 review of submission by G.Talamo



    Greetings. My name is Gerardo Talamo and I would like to know how can I improve this page Im working on. Isaac Bencid has been one of the most notables executive producers in Venezuela in the last few years working the most important artists, sports players and companies and others.

    My experience in this kind of papers helped me to contribute with all the references. All based on newspapers, direct links to the videos that have been aired in Venezuela (proven). I worked on every reference well taken.

    Well, I wait for your recommendations to improve it.

    Thanks in advance,

    Gerardo

    PS. In case you need my resume please let me know.

    Request on 18:13:03, 19 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Chelsea Guy



    Chelsea Guy (talk) 18:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    18:27:26, 19 December 2016 review of submission by XanderPSamaras



    Hi! I am confused why the page I submitted on Gabo Arora was not approved. I don't understand what you mean by "there's nothing for a notable article in our policies because there's also no automatic inherited notability from the UN itself, it's clearly too soon." Can you please elaborate so I can make the necessary changes? Thanks.

    Request on 19:01:00, 19 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Hcametti


    Hello, I am writing to ask for assistance on the page I am trying to create for Sam S. Jain. Mr. Jain is the founder of Fareportal, a $4.5 billion company which owns and operates consumer facing brands travel CheapOair and OneTravel.

    Mr.Jain is a very successful entrepreneur and his accomplishments have been covered by notable publications such as Fortune, Skift, and TravelPulse. These references were recorded in the draft submission for this page.

    Additionally we are seeking to create this page as there is someone that exists by the same name, Sam Jain, currently listed on Wikipedia that is not beneficial for our company. The other Sam Jain is also an internet entrepreneur but is a fugitive with pending arrest warrants. Given the similarities in name and occupation, I'm sure you can understand why we would like to have a page for Sam S. Jain to avoid any confusion.

    Please let me know what I can further do to ensure this page is published as quickly as possible.

    Many Thanks

    FareportalH (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)HannahFareportalH (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    FareportalH (talk) 19:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 19:02:02, 19 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Jlk0221


    Hello - I'm am so confused as to your reasons for denying this article from publication on wikipedia. I've been working with two other editors to get it into proper shape - and they both agreed that it was in fact notable. Then you come along and say otherwise - how can that be? We are all working on the same criteria - are we not?

    A read through the discussion, you will see all of the material and references that deems the company as notable. Most significant is the fact that the company has over 9 patents that have made significant contributions to the advancement of wireless and wireline telephone networks.

    I'd like to request that you reconsider your decision and actually use your editorial status to approve this article. Side note - don't mean to be argumentative - but I've no idea how you came up with the statement that a company must be older than 10 years to be notable - where is that published on wikipedia? Seems like this is just an opinion of yours - and not a policy.

    Thank you.Jlk0221 (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Jlk0221 (talk) 19:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Pomfort Silverstack

    Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Pomfort Silverstack, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: For a draft, it's not that bad and is salvageable. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    21:47:12, 19 December 2016 review of submission by Ninian van folk


    Can you expand on your comments about the business side of things as being trivial.

    23:29:03, 19 December 2016 review of submission by Zulutimepilot


    Dear SwisterTwister, Thanks for reviewing my article. When I initially received and analyzed your comments rejecting the draft, my reaction to your main criticism of the article, namely, “Simply nothing satisfying the needed notability for a convincing article,” was that your sweeping criticism, based upon your own subjective standards, is itself unsupportable under Wikipedia standards, and wholly unconvincing.

    With a wave of your wand (your pen) dismiss the significance of an endeavor that people of all races and nationalities around the world have, for nearly a century, found and continue to find of great interest, and which is considered a hallmark and touchstone of aviation achievement and national pride; namely, the solo around the world flight.

    Julie Wang is the ninth woman in history to have successfully completed a solo circumnavigation of the earth in an aircraft and the first and only Chinese person to have done so. It is of historic significance to a wide range of people, not only 1.4 billion Chinese people for whom the name “Wang Zheng” will become associated with a national hero, but for those in the general aviation community and general population who understand what it takes to pilot a small aircraft solo around the earth in 18 days.

    What you glibly dismiss as unnoteworthy, the general population considers heroic. On November 7, 2016, Wang Zheng, a Chinese citizen, received the Key to the City of West Palm Beach from the City Commission, in recognition of her accomplishment.

    I put the matter down for a few weeks to get some distance and returned to it a few days ago. I am still unpersuaded that you have not substituted your own standards for Wikipedia’s.

    In the first place, a solo circumnavigation of the Earth by a female aviator has only been accomplished by eight women in history, and never before by a Chinese or any other Asian. Contrary to your personal opinion, it is, in itself, a noteworthy accomplishment by any standard, including Wikipedia’s. How do we know that? Because of the number of Wikipedia articles about other female aviators who’s only “noteworthy” achievement is a solo circumnavigation around the Earth.

    For example, look at Gaby Kennard’s Wikipedia article; she’s one of the eight. It consists of just five sentences and only one reference. It begins: “Gaby Kennard (born 1944, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) was the first Australian woman to circumnavigate the globe by airplane.” That’s her notability and it meets Wikipedia standards.

    How about the U.K.’s Polly Vacher? Another of the eight. She is notable for completing a solo circumnavigation and for becoming the first solo woman flyer over the polar regions. Also only one reference, a primary source: Vacher’s own book. Jennifer Murray? Her Wikipedia entry is two sentences: it begins: “Jennifer Murray (born June 1940 in Providence, Rhode Island) circumnavigated the globe aboard a Robinson R44 helicopter the distance of 36,000 miles in 97 days in 2000, earning her the current Guinness World Record for the first helicopter circumnavigation by a woman. What about Amelia Rose Earhart, who circumnavigated the globe in 2014 but did not fly solo or set any record? She has a Wikipedia page too and a good one-third the article debunks her claimed relationship to her famous namesake, Amelia Mary Earhart, (there is no relationship) while another editor also debunks the younger Earhart’s erroneous claim to have been the youngest woman to fly around the world. This article too meets Wikipedia standards for notability.

    The consistent existence of these Wikipedia articles, in which individuals are noteworthy on account of completion of the endeavor of flying around the world, mandates that Julie Wang’s solo record-setting circumnavigation for which she won a $150,000 prize awarded by AOPA China, and which has been recognized by leading U.S., China and international aviation authorities (AOPA, AOPA China, IAOPA, CAAC) cannot be excluded on supposed “lacking noteworthiness” grounds.

    Wang Zheng, moreover, is an emerging aviation pioneer. Not only is she the first Chinese person to successfully complete a solo flight around the world but is also the first Chinese to earn an FAA flight instructor certificate, the first Chinese to earn each of the three FAA flight instructor certificates (CFI, CFII, MEI), and is the first Chinese to be FAA-approved and designated as the chief flight instructor of an FAA Part 141 training program.

    As to your comment that sources must be “reliable,” it’s hard to understand what is lacking in this respect in the current draft given Wikipedia’s requirements. All of the sources cited in the article about Ms. Wang are independent secondary sources consisting of either articles written by journalists covering the story for major newspapers with reputation for fact-checking in keeping with accepted journalistic standards – and Wikipedia’s – e.g., Miami Sun-Sentinel, TCPalm Network (Gannett), USA TODAY (the original story from Gannet’s Oshkosh Northwestern while the reporter was covering EAA at Oshkosh last summer), the FAA, the Palm Beach Post, AOPA Cloud and AOPA itself. All these are secondary sources from major newspapers/outlets (and are just a sampling of dozens of articles and interviews that continue to be published in major U.S. and China media channels). What specifically about the “reliability” of these sources is in question?

    I’ve added another half-dozen or so references to the existing independent sources such as AOPA and International AOPA, to document their recognition of Julie Wang’s accomplishment, and have resubmitted the article for review. I do not, however, see that there is any deficiency in the reliability or impartiality of the previously supplied information about the solo circumnavigation event or about Julie Wang herself.

    I would agree – although you didn’t make this point – that the article could be polished a bit and tightened by the talented editors of the Wikipedia community, and hope we can quickly move to that point.Zulutimepilot (talk) 23:29, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 23:49:53, 19 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Ptregan


    Hi - I don't understand why the article was rejected - can you be a little more specific please.

    PTR 23:49, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

    14:07:05, 20 December 2016 review of submission by CJParsons



    Hi My Name is Chris, I am trying to submit my Wikipedia article on "Lindsay Ridgeway". I am a UMass Amherst student in "COMM394". Is there a way I can send in some type of "appeal" in order to get my page approved in order to be graded?


    Hello, I've seen your comment on my draft page and have downsized the plot accordingly. Is it acceptable now? I feel like deleting more would remove some important information of the book. Thank you --Girl next Dior (talk) 19:55, 20 December 2016 (GMT)


    Request on 20:29:28, 20 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Fasching web radio


    Listen, this band has released 4 albums to date, they have been around for years, I have backed up the submission for this article with over 30 reviews from music magazines the genuineness of which is fully verifiable if you bother actually visiting their sites. This band is getting reviewed in paper magazines as well, alongside with getting regular airplay in radio stations all across the globe. I don't see what more you want to accept this submission. Perhaps the reviewers at Wikipedia ought to start showing more common sense and less rigidity with submissions.Fasching web radio (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Fasching web radio (talk) 20:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    23:13:40, 20 December 2016 review of submission by Downtheroad35


    Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for reviewing the article Draft:Juice Beauty. I have edited the article so it no longer reads as an advertisement or PR listing. I used wikipedia articles (already approved) from similar beauty companies of Juice Beauty's size as a guide in knowing how to write Draft:Juice Beauty. I hope the revised draft is satisfactory to Wikipedia's standards and I do appreciate any other advice you can give the article.

    Downtheroad35 (talk) 23:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)Downtheroad35[reply]

    23:19:17, 20 December 2016 review of submission by KylePatton



    I see the article as showing little to no positive bias - the sources cited are independent, and I reported on the company due to its significance as a new emerging disrupter. I do not work there, and was seeking to report on a company in my community, that seems to be doing interesting things in the space.

    If a recognized news publication saw it fit to report on it, does that not lend credence to the significance of the company itself?

    Let me know what can be fixed here as I do not see any issues in the article myself.

    KylePatton (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for the clarification! Just to confirm - I should just keep an eye on the company and if they get covered by a major publication e.g. Reuters, The Economist, Time, etc. then I should resubmit?

    KylePatton (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    [1] "Why [would] the financial information about a [company] be inappropriate content?"

    Would also debate the fact that The Toronto Star article does not contain significant information. If it is the case rather that you consider it to be a minor local publication, that seems like an arbitrary definition. What circulation must a publication get to be legitimate?

    Thanks. KylePatton (talk) 23:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays

    Merry Christmas, SwisterTwister!
    Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. And for all the help you've thrown my way over the years. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 23:49, 20 December 2016 (UTC)         [reply]

    Nomination of Solodev for deletion

    A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solodev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

    The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solodev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

    Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Joe (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Establishing notability

    Thanks SwisterTwister for your comment the draft article for creation on Credible. [2] Unclear how "only" being around 4 years would be a notability issue. There are more than 40 million people with student loan debt. Refinancing is a fairly new thing. As CNN Money has reported, Credible estimates 8 million borrowers could qualify to refinance their student loan debt at lower rates. [3] Some "notable" companies in the business include CommonBond [4], SoFi [5], and Earnest [6]. The CNN Money article is one of numerous "significant in-depth third-party major news" sources cited in the article. 162.245.21.61 (talk) 01:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    06:37:17, 21 December 2016 review of submission by Luleaa


    Can you clarify just how many references are needed to satisfy that requirement? There are quite a few in the article already but I guess it is not enough.

    Thanks!

    07:29:19, 21 December 2016 review of submission by Luleaa


    Thanks for your help! I have continued to add references, including one about a tribute to him on the floor of the house of representatives. I hope this is sufficient. If it is not I can keep digging. There are numerous articles that refer to him winning awards for example, but they don't say which ones. :)

    Festive greetings!

    A barnstar of deep recognition for all your efforts on Women in Red throughout the year. Enjoy the end of year festivities and prepare to put more women on the world map in 2017. --Ipigott (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 11:02:12, 21 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by FragileDiamonds


    Hi and thank you for quickly reviewing my first ever draft.

    Could you please help me with a few things as there are many topics and articles on Wikipedia and I feel like I've finally found something which nobody else has touched upon :) - I just have a few questions regarding your comment about the page hopefully I can improve the article for inclusion: "This is simply a local business listing and none of it establishes actual independent notability, regardless of anything or anyone else, because all this is for is a local company with local attention and activities."

    Question 1 - This is simply a local business listing My research tells me that this company has a headquarters, just like many other companies listed on Wikipedia of a similar nature, but they are predominantly an online company which also serves European countries. I've found nothing to suggest that it is simply a local company. I've tried to convey this through the article, but I've obviously not done a very good job of this. How can I explain to the reader that the company has a headquarters and showroom but is a major online retailer?

    Question 2 - none of it establishes actual independent notability I discovered the company in the Sunday Times newspaper when reading about the Fast Track 100 which I believe to be an independent, notable source. I couldn't link to this via The Sunday Times website as it is subscription only - How do I use the newspaper as a source as it was in there? While searching online I found that Fast Track, who run the awards, listed them as well and I used that source instead. I'm just unsure why this is independent notability?

    Question 3 - because all this is for is a local company with local attention and activities I was under the impression that the Sunday Times Fast Track 100 is national recognition, is this a bad source or do I need the newspaper source for this? I also believe that sponsoring a major television channel's programs is a national activity and has national attention.

    Question 4 I'm very new to writing articles for Wikipedia and I understand getting it right the first time is probably a miracle. I've re-read the article several times and I cannot see how it comes across as an advertisement. Could you please point me towards areas of the article which you feel advertise the company rather than inform the reader?

    I will take a look at articles from some similar companies and see what they have done I'm sure this will give me some inspiration but I really appreciate your time and would love to hear your feedback.

    Many warm regards

    FragileDiamonds (talk) 11:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Children's Day Hospital

    Hello ST, see my Talk page. --Po Kadzieli (talk) 11:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Re: Draft:First_Avenue_Partners

    Hi there

    I hope you are well.

    This is my draft - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:First_Avenue_Partners

    I'm a bit unclear about the guidelines as I cannot see any substantive difference between my page and other similar pages, eg;

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eaton_Partners

    I was wondering if you could give me a little more information about why these pages are deemed ok but mine isn't as they seem to be using references that similar to mine and a very similar format. Thanks. That will enable me to make the changes required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob P. Keating (talk • contribs) 11:45, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    "Removed worst of it"

    Have you got any more feedback on this edit to Kantar Health? Deleting whole sections of a page with a four word explanation isn't very useful to my understanding, or future contributors to the page. Gmseow (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Gmseow That's because literally all of it was clear PR sourced by either their published or republished PR. SwisterTwister talk 18:13, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    If that's what you think, then please take the time to say that. Comments like "Removed worst of it" just come across as snarky. I could see how the a Awards section might seem cynical (although it was not intended to be), but I don't understand how your criticism applies to the ISO Certification section you removed. It only references 2 third party sites, which are considered important enough to have their own Wikipedia page. Ultimately I'm not going to revert anything, I just want a bit more clarity. Gmseow (talk) 12:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Cheddar's Scratch Kitchen

    Hi! We spoke several months ago about a bunch of edits that need to be made to the Cheddar's Scratch Kitchen page, and you said that you would be able to help me get those through. I have finally gotten approval from the client and would truly appreciate your help, as I have no idea what I'm doing. I have sources for most of the updates.

    2602:301:7770:B750:814A:ABFF:B185:8F5C (talk) 15:44, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hopefully this will help substantially with draft Sharon Pincott

    Hi SwisterTwister (and Huon), I will reference this (recently published) article/review (link below) actually in the text of draft Sharon Pincott. Hopefully this new reference will help substantially for Jane Goodall/Dian Fossey mention. Will get those other edits/deletions done soon and will then go back for one final (hopefully) review before resubmitting. https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2016-12-20-elephant-dawn-the-high-cost-of-hanging-out-with-elephants/#.WFqvhSKz-M8 Arnie1000 (talk) 16:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi SwisterTwister, I have compiled cases in which Juice Beauty is mentioned in more in-depth third-party major news and made appropriate edits to Draft:Juice Beauty. Thanks to your advice, I am confident and have re-submitted the draft for approval. Downtheroad35 (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Downtheroad35[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    The Barnstar of Diligence
    Happy Holidays and a Prosperous 2017 to you and yours. Quis separabit? 06:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    References

    1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Vidyard
    2. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Credible
    3. ^ http://money.cnn.com/2016/11/15/pf/college/student-loan-refinance/index.html
    4. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CommonBond
    5. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SoFi
    6. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earnest_(company)

    08:02:46, 22 December 2016 review of submission by Paul Lavern



    Hello, I wonder why do you mean by independent sources? The director doesn't have websites or anything under his name. As the article says, and it is well known in Hollywood, he is an autism person, and does not have any personal pages. By saying that statement you are not being just. All links are from very reliable sources, like IMDb or news papers from Argentina, Spain, France, even Variety Magazine from Los Angeles, which is the number one publication for the Entertainment Industry. There are more than 200 links. Have you read all of them to jump into this conclusion after just 10 minutes of posting the page? The bottom line is that I used the same parameters used in James Cameron's page. Michael Bay's page and Steven Spielberg's Page, using the same sources, which is always IMDb. If what I wrote is wrong, would you mind to help me by being more specific? If you think that a director that is ranked under 1000K in IMDb is not worth of an article, then 99% of the directors/producers in Wikipedia must be removed. I just wonder of you didn't like my visual approach in the article, trying to give more life to the page. And finally, maybe for you is not important, specially from the American audience point of view, but what Milos Twilight did for Argentine Tennis is the biggest thing ever done for the sport, and has been congratulated by the Argentine President Macri. The funny part is that all Milos's partners have their pages published, even his actors have pages, but you qualify him as not important enough to be in Wikipedia, while his employees do qualify? Please, I beg you to explain me what was that you didn't like. I really need to know details. Thanks for your time and consideration.

    PAUL LAVERN

    Mord Fustang (Estonian DJ)

    I'm confused about a series of edits and I'm hoping you can help. The article "Mord Fustang" was submitted as an article for creation, and you declined it here on Dec. 21st. The article's creator then renamed the article here on Dec. 22nd and re-submitted the article to AfC (without making any of the changes you suggested), where the article was accepted. I've rarely used the AfC process and have never changed the name of an article, so I may be completely incorrect in assuming any WP:GAMING or attempt to subvert your decision. Thanks for looking into this. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Gaming. Looks like issues with the salt, but I've moved it back to draft until the issue can be sorted. Primefac (talk) 12:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 13:34:30, 22 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Tventgroup



    Tventgroup (talk) 13:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello What sources would you consider reliable? Thank You in advance.

    Request on 16:37:57, 22 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Ennisjr31


    Hi. I'm AJ Gibson's personal assistant. You declined the submission for AJ Gibson who is a TV Talk Show Host. According to your notes, he is not notable enough even though my sources were from well known trade magazines in the industry like The Hollywood Reporter. Furthermore, we need his Wikipedia page to be approved because right now when you search for him, Google is pulling info from A.J. Gibson (Architect) Wikipedia who has been dead for years. Please let me know what else you need to establish notablity. He makes national TV appearances and hosted a national show on FOX. A little confused as to why this was declined. Thanks. --Ennisjr31 (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Ennisjr31 (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Your feedback on the René Colato Laínez article

    Hello! You recently proposed that the article René Colato Laínez be deleted, because "the sources are entirely trivial and unconvincing and he's not held in any libraries". I was wondering if you could be more specific about your critiques -- perhaps on the article's Talk page -- because I particularly don't understand the library comment. His books seem to be held in plenty of libraries (several of his books being held in at least 400 different library systems within the U.S. alone), and I didn't see anything in WP:AUTHOR saying that there's a minimum number of library holdings. I also don't see any justification for your assertion that this article expresses a certain POV; it's mostly pretty dry biographical and bibliographic information. Could you please clarify these points when you get a chance? Thanks!

    Sandbergja (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Sandbergja It's not a significant amount of libraries, however. SwisterTwister talk 22:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your response. I guess I'd just like to know what a significant amount of libraries is, in your view. As a librarian myself, I consider that to be a significant number of libraries. Do you have a guideline that you prefer? And is there a specific Wikipedia policy on number of libraries that you are referring to, or is this just your own personal opinion? -- Sandbergja (talk) 22:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Submission Underground 2

    Hey! In regards to your comment about my draft for Submission Underground 2. If I include a page for Submission Underground 1 and get into detail about the planned Submission Underground 3 will that be enough information to help the notability of the event. It's a widely discussed and followed event in the wrestling / MMA community so any way I can convey that would work. The events are causing lots of Reddit conversation Submission Underground Conversation Bermsalot (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC) Bermsalot[reply]

    Sources Question

    What are good sources to establish notability for new actors and politician pages?Capolitico (talk) 21:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    21:53:49, 22 December 2016 review of submission by Winterstonepics


    Hey there. I'm quite new to Wikipedia, and trying to submit some information on the film DESERTED, not promotional, just factual as the film was recently released. I updated the article based on your suggestions (news articles, etc) but wanted to see if it was possible for you to re-review, or to let me know what else I should provide or take out. Thank you kindly!

    LA Weekly and Variety seem like pretty big entertainment sources to me too, I'm new to wiki too and want to know what are good sources for actors and movies? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capolitico (talk • contribs) 00:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 02:12:11, 23 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Editoremacb


    Hi, I added references to outside independent sources (Harvard Business Review) to Behnam Tabrizi's article and hope that suffices? The Harvard Business Review is an important publication, and columnist Tom Peters is a big deal, too. But maybe there is something I'm missing. Applied business books don't get reviewed the same way other books do.

    Please let me know, in any case.

    Editoremacb (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    07:40:45, 23 December 2016 review of submission by Archandrian


    Honestly, reading through the professor guidelines, I don't see your point. Starting with the first criteria, "The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources," The first citation I offer (We Salute), seems to substantiate his contribution to his field. Also, the sixth criteria, "The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society" seems to be covered through his Presidency at The ASA, an organization that seems broadly equivalent to the IEEE (listed as an an example of a permissable society on that page). I added more citations in an attempt to clarify this for you. Does this satisfy, and, if not, can you provide more detail on what you mean? Your one sentence was pretty vague...

    chrissy greetings

    Hi SwisterTwister, Mwiaowy xmas Coolabahapple (talk) 15:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Ken Ballantyne

    Hi Swister Twister, You reviewed some articles for me earlier this year. Could you please review this one for me when you have time. Thanks.Gomach (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    21:20:26, 23 December 2016 review of submission by Doulosservant



    Thanks for your fine work, Dave ... I also have a photo from my appearance at the 2016 Tribeca Film Festival that I'd like to add ... It did not let me the first time ... The photo was taken by a friend, but on my cell phone ... What more would I need specifically to get this entry ... and ... is Date of Birth necessary?

    Notable

    SwisterTwister, you know I'm a big fan of your work, but this is not helpful. First of all you're not being very helpful to a new editor, one we should try to bring in; and second, well, one source is a start, and we're talking about a major publication by a notable author. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Yes! hehehe :P KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 02:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]
    OK--except that I didn't find it very funny. Please check Bitter_in_the_Mouth#References. Drmies (talk) 14:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Merry Christmas

    Hello SwisterTwister: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

    09:19:52, 24 December 2016 review of submission by MrBenzedrine42


    The submitted article is a first draft; after the addition of more concrete sources and relevant information, it should be more presentable. The subject's activism and political career are not yet fully detailed in the current draft. Since this is my first ever contribution to Wikipedia, I would deeply appreciate suggestions to improve the acceptability of my article.

    19:06, 21 December 2016 (UTC) review of submission by Tyttcfm


    Thank you for reviewing this article. In the past few days, I've revamped it and added more content and sources to try and meet the notability standards. I hope the article is approvable now. Happy holidays!

    Thanks for your fast review!

    Merry whateveryoucelebrate this time'o year. I got a question, you just declined Draft:Annie Maynard which is OK with me. No problem. Now enlighten me, how is this women less notable than Maribel Arana? I just picked here out, took me under a minute to find this women. There are plenty more. She has nothing on her notability list; Miss Guatemala 2008 und she went to a University. One reference. Whoopy! I am a little confused, actually. Junk with boobs is more notable? Scratch head..... Anywho, I thought I place the draft on the list, since there's usually a backup for anything useful on Wikis, I am working on Commons and OTRS, I know backups. You've been too fast with that one. Again, merry youknowwhat. :-) --Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 16:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hedwig in Washington, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS for the answer to your first question. Primefac (talk) 16:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]
    I am a sysop on Commons and well aware of othersh**exists. I asked for an explanation why one is more notable than the other. The guidelines don't make much sense there. --Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 17:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Merry Christmas and happy holidays!

    Hello SwisterTwister: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, GSS (talk) 17:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

    Request on 18:00:33, 24 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Fabulatuaest


    Church is a megachurch in Singapore and also manages the spiritual welfare of >1000+ students (enrolment at acs barker alone is 1,390)

    Fabulatuaest (talk) 18:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
    Hey, just to let you know that your work on AfC et. al. has been notice and appreciated. Happy Christmas, or Holidays or whatever is appropriate for your beliefs. Keep up the the grand work and all the best for 2017 KylieTastic (talk) 20:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    21:13:09, 24 December 2016 review of submission by 72.225.0.163


    Col. Leech is notable earlier settler/pioneer of Western NY. He has the same notability as Col. Caleb Hopkins which can be found here:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caleb_Hopkins_(colonel)

    What else can be done to get the Col. approved? Many of the sources are independent of each other and have been published. On top of that he has a notable genealogy that should also be considered. Lastly, his home is one of the oldest homes still standing in WNY which is built in the New England style from where he was from.

    Happy Holidays

    The 12 Days of Wikipedia
    On the 12th day of Christmas Jimbo sent to me
    12 BLPs
    11 RFAs
    10 New Users
    9 Barn Stars
    8 Admins Blocking
    7 Socks Socking
    6 Clerks Clerking
    5. Check Users Checking
    4 Over Sighters Hiding
    3 GAs
    2. Did You Knows
    and an ARB in a pear tree.

    -May your holiday season be filled with joy, laughter and good health. --Cameron11598

    05:38:20, 25 December 2016 review of submission by Paul Lavern



    Thanks for the suggestions. I guess it's a genuine rooky mistake. I'll try my best to improve the next submission, following your lead. In the meantime, I'm preparing now another article, let's see if that one it's closer to the Wikipedia's Standards.

    PaulPaul Lavern (talk) 05:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    23:40:18, 25 December 2016 review of submission by 37.203.168.68



    All sources used in the article are by independent and established media outlets. If this does not satisfy the requirements, then no company pages should be included on Wikipedia. Please reconsider or this issue or remove all company pages on Wikipedia, to show consequential application of policies.

    00:58:44, 26 December 2016 review of submission by Nashaj79


    The article included four references from reliable news sources covering the band as they have toured with a notable Grammy awarding winning artist in recent years. Additionally, the images and references to the band are also currently available with Wikipedia Commons. Can you provide addition guidance on what types of additional coverage would be required to confirm the band's notability? As I have seen other band pages with far less reference information etc., this will help to clarify what more can be added to obtain approval. Thank you for your assistance and I look forward to your feedback as I truly believe this band deserves to be included in the database.

    Request on 04:46:05, 26 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Aankitmishra


    Hi There! Advanced Wishes for a another Happy new year!! This is my first article at Wikipedia, as one of my client has their name listed in List_of_mathematics_competitions but no further information was mentioned, so I submitted my first article at wiki unfortunately their were some errors in the article which volatile the policies and article couldn't get published. In order to understand what type of article get places in Wikipedia i am in need of an expert review, one who can guide me that what all should we include in our content and what mistakes have I made currently.

    Looking for a review and guidance. Aankitmishra (talk) 04:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Aankitmishra (talk) 04:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    14:04:04, 26 December 2016 review of submission by Rgsedona



    Greetings,

    I looked at a number of Wikipedia articles which I used as a reference to write this. Such as the wiki for "My Pillow". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Pillow

    That wiki is completely self serving. Mine is less so. If I recraft mine to be more specific about my product only like he did will that work?

    Any advice would be appreciated.

    Rgds,

    Ralph Granchelli

    14:05:16, 26 December 2016 review of submission by Rgsedona



    Greetings,

    I looked at a number of Wikipedia articles which I used as a reference to write this. Such as the wiki for "My Pillow". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Pillow

    That wiki is completely self serving. Mine is less so. If I recraft mine to be more specific about my product only like he did will that work?

    Any advice would be appreciated.

    Rgds,

    Ralph GranchelliRgsedona (talk) 14:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    14:06:41, 26 December 2016 review of submission by Rgsedona



    Greetings,

    I looked at a number of Wikipedia articles which I used as a reference to write this. Such as the wiki for "My Pillow". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Pillow

    That wiki is completely self serving. Mine is less so. If I recraft mine to be more specific about my product only like he did will that work?

    Any advice would be appreciated.

    Rgds,

    Ralph GranchelliRgsedona (talk) 14:06, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 14:17:14, 26 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by MHKangas


    Hi SwisterTwister,

    I wonder if you have had the chance to look at the changes I have made to my article draft "Helix Dumper"?

    I understand that the article was not accepted because the references did not adequately show the subject's notability. I have now inserted the references as footnotes and the references include articles from both newspapers and journals - all of which are independent sources. The Helix Dumper has generated attention worldwide and the references I have included come from independent sources that originate in at least three different countries. I believe that I have now presented sufficient proof of the subject matter's notability.

    In my article I mention a comparable invention in the bulk freight industry - the rotary car dumper. I have included a link to an article about this invention on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotary_car_dumper If you visit the page you'll see that it includes no references and no evidence about its notability. I am therefore confused as to why my article about the Helix Dumper is rejected, while the article about the Rotary car dumper has been approved? The Helix Dumper and the Rotary Turn Dumper are both major inventions that are of similar importance for the bulk freight industry.

    I'd appreciate if would have time to look at my draft again and see whether it might perhaps meet the standards for publication?

    Best regards, MHKangas

    MHKangas (talk) 14:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]





    MHKangas (talk) 14:17, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    16:06:31, 26 December 2016 review of submission by Raz.korn


    Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for reviewing the article on SAP Web IDE. I saw that the reject reason was regarding information sources. For this article I used as many non-SAP sources as possible. I used "Enterprise IT World", "CIO", "insideSAP", "TechTarget", "Forbes" and more. I'd appreciate if you can let me know how I can make this article better and published :-).

    Request on 17:57:44, 26 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Editoremacb


    Hi SwisterTwister, I added some more sources to the Behnam Tabrizi article -- they include Harvard Business Review, Tom Peters of the Chicago Tribune and the San Jose Mercury, and I added another CEO in addition to Schmidt of Google (I added the CEO of the Carlyle Group). Applied business books are typically covered by HBR if they are notable, but they are not reviewed like a novel or a theoretical book. I"m also trying to get a photo of Tabrizi uploaded, but haven't been able to figure that out. Any help is much appreciated! 

    Editoremacb (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Editoremacb (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    20:43:36, 26 December 2016 review of submission by Chris Ivey


    Dear SisterTwister,

    I'm perfectly willing to accept that my submission might need changes or additional content, but I don't think it would serve the public well by simply inserting the content into the unmanned vehicles page. My connection to the term is because of my involvement in military and civilian tech relating to providing spatial awareness for BVLOS operations. I have expertise in this area, but no experience as a Wiki editor.

    I do notice that I can search other acronyms like "LOS". Having an entry for each interpretation of the acronym helps with disambiguation.

    BVLOS is an acronym that will be generating a lot of searches over the next few years. It is at the center of a lot of legal and regulatory disputes because it is something that has to be addressed in order for the civilian UAV industry to survive. The first organizations with BVLOS clearance will inevitably end up dominating the industry for decades to come. There are literally billions of dollars at stake, and they can only be realized when regulations governing civilian BVLOS operations are agreed and standardized by organizations like the FAA. We are just starting to see enquiries from the scientific press as to what the "BVLOS" acronym means and why it's important. People will likely also be searching it independently of "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle". Users should be able to determine what the acronym means without having to find it in the context of a longer page.

    What can be done to make this entry suitable for publication?

    20:48:07, 26 December 2016 review of submission by Chris Ivey


    Dear SisterTwister,

    I'm perfectly willing to accept that my submission might need changes or additional content, but I don't think it would serve the public well by simply inserting the content into the unmanned vehicles page. My connection to the term is because of my involvement in military and civilian tech relating to providing spatial awareness for BVLOS operations. I have expertise in this area, but no experience as a Wiki editor.

    I do notice that I can search other acronyms like "LOS". Having an entry for each interpretation of the acronym helps with disambiguation.

    BVLOS is an acronym that will be generating a lot of searches over the next few years. It is at the center of a lot of legal and regulatory disputes because it is something that has to be addressed in order for the civilian UAV industry to survive. The first organizations with BVLOS clearance will inevitably end up dominating the industry for decades to come. There are literally billions of dollars at stake, and they can only be realized when regulations governing civilian BVLOS operations are agreed and standardized by organizations like the FAA. Groups like ASSUREUAS are working with regulators, and a spate of new rules will be published over the next few months.

    We are just starting to see enquiries from the scientific press as to what the "BVLOS" acronym means and why it's important. People will likely also be searching it independently of "Unmanned Aerial Vehicle". Users should be able to determine what the acronym means without having to find it in the context of a longer page.

    What can be done to make this entry suitable for publication?


    Merry, merry!

    From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 22:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

    Thanks for your feedback! Since submitting the first draft of the "Lydia Lohrer" article I've acquired a much better collection of sources independent of the subject, including .gov citations. Is it acceptable to add multiple inline citations to a single line of text in cases where more than one source is used for reference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrBenzedrine42 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 09:46:08, 27 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Piaadibe


    Hi SwisterTwister! Thanks for your prompt review of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:George_Siedel https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:George_Siedel#

    I will look for more in-depth sourcing, this criteria looks promising https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(academics) What part of the criteria would you suggest to focus most? Best regards, Pia Piaadibe 09:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

    Piaadibe 09:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

    11:08:47, 27 December 2016 review of submission by Fasching web radio


    The article needs 'better' major references? Please define better, doesn't Wikipedia base the inclusion of its articles on whether the subjects are talked about? So in your opinion, unless if major media sources are citing a subject, then any exposure a band gets from any other VERIFIABLE media isn't worthy of an inclusion? What a terribly elitist view...Fasching web radio (talk) 11:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC) Hi SwisterTwister, well what is your take on my last comment? Things aren't moving very fast with Wikipedia articles it seems, not to mention your criteria for accepting (or rejecting) articles are very unclear and not very fair, to say the least. You are definitely not making it easy for people who want to add genuine contributions to the encyclopedia... do you want Wikipedia to remain a source of information that people can trust? Personally, like many others, I am fast losing faith in this encyclopedia being an unbiased source of information for users.Fasching web radio (talk) 23:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Stryker and MFT

    Hello SwisterTwister I appreciate the work you do. I was trying to complete my first Wikipedia article for a college class and trying to learn how Wikipedia works. I provided reputable links I found online including MTV for Stryker and MFT. Here is one of the most recent links I found http://www.axs.com/colorado-hip-hop-artists-stryker-mft-of-50-50innertainment-become-co-s-112155 this is by AXS.com, and I'm sure I can find more. I apologize for any inconvenience I have caused on the sight just trying to do my best but kind of feel like a failure. Please help me out with publishing the article or fixing it, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johny5000 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi ST. 50/50Innertainment (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) is related. You may want to take a look. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:47, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Understandable, what can we do to fix this? They are also clearly musicians and a Record Label. I appreciate your help also to fix the issue — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johny5000 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Stryker and MFT

    Stryker and MFT (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)
    Johny5000 (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    16:57:06, 27 December 2016 review of submission by OneliaCM

    Please re-review the Andy Sweet submission. I added outside references from publications and added links. I added info on exhibitions.


    Review of Cairo contemporary dance center draft article

    Hi. I am a bit tired to see that everything that I am trying to publish concerning the Arab world is systematically considered as 'not noticeable enough' by people who probably have never set a foot in this region. My draft article about Cairo contemporary dance centers contains almost 20 references, many links to already existing wikipedia pages. Plus you will find already in wikipedia at least 4 or 5 pages mentioning the center. So yeah, the references might not come from the NY Time or the Washington Post, but most of them come from reputable (notable) local - and English speaking - newspapers and organizations. If UNESCO, Drosos Foundation, Daily News Egypt, Mada Masr, El Ahram, Cairo360, Zawya, and some of world-class choreographers listed in the references are not noticeable enough for you, I guess there is something wrong with wikipedia policy - or people trying to implement it. CCDC is the first African and Arab contemporary dance school, certified by UNESCO, and a major actor in the Egyptian independent art scene, and I think it deserves to have a page on Wikipedia, even if the Times and most of the Western audience don't care about it. I'd appreciate your help in this. Thanx. Taha.Radi (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Taha.Radi[reply]

    • I deleted the Mission section. I'd like to understand what you call "major news", as I already have references from all the major English-speaking Egyptian newspaper + notable international organizations such as UNESCO. Taha.Radi —Preceding undated comment added 20:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • I already have a dozen of serious reference, i.e. article from reputable Egyptian English-peaking newspapers, among them the most famous, mot read and most distributed ones (Ahram Weekly, Daily News Egypt, Mada Masr). I don't see how I can bring more than that. I want to underline the fact that The Townhouse Gallery or Downtown Contemporary Arts Festival D-CAF, which are organizations of the same level that CCDC, do have wikipedia pages though having way way less references. Even El Sawy Culture Wheel, one of Cairo's most famous venues, has less references than CCDC! There is an obvious double-standard here that I'd like to understand where it come from... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taha.Radi (talk • contribs) 13:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    The Rock 'n Roll Rebels

    Hi SwisterTwister - regarding the notability of the subject the Rock 'n Roll Rebels were considered as having been part of one of the worst professional wrestling gimmicks of all-time when the competed as "The Ding Dongs" in WCW. Five of the six books that I provided as sources extrapolate on the notoriety of the characters, as do several of the online articles (the sixth book - The Pro Wrestling Hall of Fame: The Tag Teams - talks about their time as "The Rock n Roll Rebels"). Their fame - or infamy - comes from the Ding Dong gimmick, and I used historyofwwe.com (which has complete, comprehensive match results for the WWF and WCW by year) to flesh out how their career trajectory abruptly changed following the harsh reception that they received. I could have used YouTube as well, but as I understand that is not an approved reference for Wikipedia. Evans and Sartain are no less notable that enhancement talent that have Wikipedia pages such as George South, Mario Mancini, Dusty Wolfe, or Brady Boone, and I've provided far more sources that any of these pages. Thanks. Marino73 (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Marino73[reply]

    Single by 30, Thanks and Happy Holidays

    Thank you for looking over my article Single by 30 and categorizing it and renaming it to the correct title. I think I looked over the comments you left? I followed the link you messaged to me on my talk page, and that led me to the article and its talk page where the only new 'comment' I saw was its categorization into the WikiProject Internet Culture. Hopefully I didn't miss anything! Anyways thanks, and hope you have a happy holiday season!

    Huangdaniel30 (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Huangdaniel30[reply]

    Hi SwisterTwister, I received the reason for rejection, ok how do I make it better. I feel this person should be part of Wikipedia, so how can I get it approved. I am not an expert in Wikipedia terms, requirements so I'm asking your assistance to get it published. I didn't read the notes at top about putting this at the bottom of the comments, so here it is and probably a duplicate. Thanks, ~~ronon44~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronon44 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    A barnstar for you!

    The Original Barnstar
    Hi,

    Just want to thank you for the efforts that you are putting in reviewing my submissions :). I don't know how to add news paper articles here. They won't be in English so looking for them online is not possible. If any suggestions, please advise. Thank you.Kavitdoshi (talk) 05:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Kavitdoshi (talk) 05:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, i got this page in Gujarati which is same one that i am trying to make in English : https://gu.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AA%95%E0%AB%81%E0%AA%82%E0%AA%95%E0%AA%BE%E0%AA%B5%E0%AA%BE%E0%AA%B5_(%E0%AA%A4%E0%AA%BE._%E0%AA%B8%E0%AA%BE%E0%AA%B5%E0%AA%B0%E0%AA%95%E0%AB%81%E0%AA%82%E0%AA%A1%E0%AA%B2%E0%AA%BE)

    So, for making this same page available in English, what will be the procedure ? can you assist in that please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kavitdoshi (talk • contribs) 06:09, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

    This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! --JustBerry (talk) 17:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    For your reference, this is the DRN case you are currently listed as an involved editor in: Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Ed_Brown_.28boxer.29. --JustBerry (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    That case has been closed as wrong forum. The proper forum is deletion review. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    January 2017 at Women in Red


    January 2017

    Women Philosophers & Women in Education online editathons
    Faciliated by Women in Red

    (To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

    AFD Discussion - List of most discussed YouTube videos (2nd nomination)

    Seeing that you have participated in the First Discussion, I have created another discussion since the article has been recreated. The discussion in question is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most discussed YouTube videos (2nd nomination). Yoshiman6464 (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    14:30:48, 29 December 2016 review of submission by Asteghene


    Hi there, thanks so much for the review of my page submission. I am desperate to know how I can correct the submission since I basically aligned with other pages in the same field that have already been published. In fact, although they all follow the same format, all the pages that I referred to contain various comments about them sounding too "promotional", "reads like a press release", and "written like an advertisement". The last link provided below only uses their own website as citations. Which is why I am so confused my submission didn't pass yet, their has. I would be so appreciative if you could help me understand what exactly I need to edit to have it published.

    Thanks so much -m

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-ACOUSTICS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Audio https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JBL

    18:53:02, 29 December 2016 review of submission by BritNSmithy


    Dear SwisterTwister,

    Thank you very much for your suggestions. I have made the following improvements to the article to substantiate Cohen's notability:

    • Added a citation to a New York Times article that quotes Cohen and discusses her book and company; this adds to the list of reliable, independent sources including Forbes, CNN and two appearances on The Today Show;
    • Added a citation to a Booklist review of Cohen's book verified on a third party library website;
    • Referred to translations of Cohen's book into Dutch and Korean;
    • Included a new URL to a more easily accessed PDF of Cohen's Harvard Business Review article "The 40-Year-Old Intern."

    Cohen's book also received a review from Business Week and a starred review from Library Journal, to name a notable few, but I am unable to find citations on websites other thanAmazon.com, and I did not know if it would be acceptable to link to that site in this case. If it is okay, please advise.

    I am hoping that, with these changes, the article can be published. I truly appreciate anything you can do to help. --BritNSmithy (talk) 18:53, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    23:06:03, 29 December 2016 review of submission by Robinpeggy


    I am mystified by the rejection. (I spent years working in the top magazines in the United States, so I know the difference between PR and neutral reporting.) Sources cited include the New York Times, CNN and the United Nations. How many would it take for you to regard this as adequately sourced?

    As for numbers, We Care Solar has served 700,000 woman in the hardest-to-reach places in the world. Is that not a big enough number?

    Carlos Medina

    Hello SwisterTwister, I saw your edition in the article Draft:Carlos_Medina, may you please clarify your argument about notability. His work is publicly present in Venezuelan cities, including Caracas major art museums. Please, point me out in the right direction. 23:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)MaoGo (talk)

    Your reviewing

    This edit comment you added at a draft started me worrying about the standards you apply while reviewing. You stated your willingness for accepting with the addition of some additional sources. However, If I look at it, it's nowhere near an encyclopedic article. The "prose" is a barely readably sea of blue lacking any informative story. Moreover, the tables are at odds with Wikipedia not being a directory of TV broadcasts. So, I really struggle to see how you would judge this worthy of being accepted.Tvx1 23:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Yes, but the basis of a television show at least being sourced by hopefully significant news is what would've made it acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 23:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    1994 higher ed

    Hi! I'm wondering what you suggest should be changed in the article? Msmullen (talk) 05:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    I have added notations to my submission - can you please review?

    Hello my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lachlan_Philpott has been annotated now with a couple of dozen notations. Even a wikipedia search brings up multiple results mentioning the person concerned. When you have time, could you please reconsider the submission? I wish you a happy new year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.254.226.30 (talk) 06:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    10:02:30, 30 December 2016 review of submission by Bettina Melzer



    Dear SwisterTwister,

    I would like to improve my article on LOOKS Film & TV - could you give some advice what I have to do in order to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. From my point of view the article has been written from a neutral point of view, but obviously I have made some mistakes. I have written several articles for German Wikipedia - this is my first for English Wikipedia. I would appreciate a lot, if you could give me some advice.

    Thank you very much. Best regards Bettina Bettina Melzer (talk) 10:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    11:36:36, 30 December 2016 review of submission by VictoriaLaw


    Hello,

    Could you please elaborate on your comment? I honestly don't think it's accurate. I would like you to give me some tips on improving this article as I can't seem to find the way to do it.

    Poonam Gupta is an iconic example of a female entrepreneur and philanthropist, I believe she deserves recognition for her achievements and charity work. Let me give you an example. Richard Lang (CEO) - has a wikipedia page. How is his page more complete than my article and what makes him more notable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by VictoriaLaw (talk • contribs) 13:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 12:39:06, 30 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by TR6-87


    Hi, thanks for your review and feedback. I felt the PCA Predict page was notable as they were the developers of cloud based address verification which is discussed in a long standing address verification article, previously it could only be done by purchasing CD databases from the postal providers. I also thought the notion of turning down $100m for the business was of notable interest.

    There are many companies on Wikipedia that have no interest other than presenting their history and products so not sure what is being classed as notable.

    Happy to take your advice and if the above is not considered of interest I will delete the article.

    Thanks

    TR6-87 TR6-87 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    TR6-87 (talk) 12:39, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Request on 16:34:41, 30 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Bent0811



    Bent0811 (talk) 16:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you for your help and the tips. Much appreciated. Ladymacbeth9 (talk) 22:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    00:23:55, 31 December 2016 review of submission by Vicpaz


    Hi, thanks for taking a look, I tried to provide as much reliable information about the body of work this artist produced that is notable for me. The guy is being mixed with homonym techno artists in Spotify, Deezer, AppelMusic et all and obviously he is much more notable than the other Daniel Diaz in terms of quality and amount of work done in the last 25 years. But that's my take.

    As for the "Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did " can you please point me to what exactly is promotional so I can delete it? I see biographical info and Discography as comprehensive as I could find putting together several sources. I'll start removing the adjectives I guess.

    Finally for he "the links are simply album listings, announcements and trivial mentions" both Ref 7 and Ref 8 are serious reviews (one quite recent the other some months old) that are very good reviews by independent media.

    Anyway, thanks for you fast response on this, I didn't expect it. Guess I'll keep learning and try to provide info to other notable artist (most already present in Wikipedia) instead of trying to file an unknown artist I like.

    Happy 2017 Vicpaz (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2016 (UTC) vic p[reply]

    MfD

    You nominated four drafts for MfD but forgot to sign them. I signed them and moved the to the correct place at MfD. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:42, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    14:54:56, 31 December 2016 review of submission by 106.192.98.134


    Hi, Thanks for reviewing the article.as you said, that the Listed sources are still only company announcements, interviews, mentions and listings. but their is a company vikram solar ( please see the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikram_Solar), they have same sources as i have with same formats ,but their article don't have any issue on wiki.the article of vikram solar is approved by wikipedia. Why ? please let me know the things .

    Thanks a Lot.

    15:55, 31 December 2016 review of submission by 2.227.120.20


    Hi SwisterTwister and thanks a lot for the feedback on this article submission I added more relevant references to the article based on the lines suggested by you in your note. Before I resubmit the article , may I request you to have a look at it and let me know if it works now I wanted to let you know that some references that i used, are featured in known Italian magazines and web sites as "ondarock" that is one of the most important music web in Italy and as 'Rumore' which is among the five alternative music magazines in Italy. I found published here on wikipedia english some bands of the same musical label of Christine Plays Viola with less notable sources. If there is anything else I can do to improve it, please let me know! Thank you! 2.227.120.20 (talk) 15:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 16:44:17, 31 December 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Njbook



    Njbook (talk) 16:44, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    SwisterTwister,

    Thanks for your comments on the John Minturn. I have added, what I believe to be, references to show the importance of the disaster not only during that contemporary period, but also the implications later for the Life-saving service and ultimately the U.S. Coast Guard. I have other international newspaper references that can also be added.

    Assuming the article is approved, I believe I should have placed my sources in the "External Links" area rather than "References". Is this something you can fix or can you tell me how to fix? Thanks for your consideration and help. NJBook

    Happy New Year SwisterTwister!

    Happy New Year!
    Hello SwisterTwister:
    Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, JustBerry (talk) 00:33, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]



    Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:SwisterTwister}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

    Happy New Year, SwisterTwister!

    Happy New Year!

    SwisterTwister,
    Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. -- Dane talk 02:29, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

    15:51:46, 1 January 2017 review of submission by Holly Richardson


    Thanks so much for reviewing the draft page for Antiques Trade Gazette. I really appreciate your time. I understand your concerns on sources. I tried to find sources that show the papers notability as the fact that it has been written about and mentioned as a "Bible" for the antiques industry by other national newspapers I thought demonstrated that it has some notability otherwise other newspapers would not bother writing about it or publishing an obituary of its founder. However I will certainly strive to find further sources in the hope you might be convinced. I have just had a look at the pages of other trade publications to try to compare what others had done. The pages on Wikipedia of publications such as Retail Week, Estates Gazette or Property Week all have far less sources. [1]

    I will certainly attempt to find other sources but if you wouldn't mind considering the page in light of these other similar publications I would be most appreciative. Many thanks for your time, Holly Richardson (talk) 15:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Sorry to add another part to my response but I also wanted to ask if you thought the following sources would improve the page? These are all from other companies or publications referring to the Antiques Trade Gazette as a 'bible' for the trade. Would these sources help if I included them? If you thought it ok I could add a line to say 'some in the trade describe the newspaper as a 'bible' of the trade.' I could then add the following links to support that Does this help answer the notability question?[reply]

    [2]

    [3]

    [4]

    [5]


    [6]

    [7] Holly Richardson (talk) 16:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello again. Thanks again for your feedback. I can keep working on it as you advise. But can I just ask another question? You say the links are too trivial. I need help understanding why they are trivial. I am not sure I understand why they are trivial. For instance one is a reference in The Burlington Magazine which is reliable (and has its own Wikipedia page) [8] and another is in the Telegraph which is a major national newspaper in the U.K.[9] . Both refer to the established and reputable nature of the Gazette. I don't understand why these are trivial? Can you explain why these references are trivial? Thank you so much for your help. 

    Holly Richardson (talk) 18:42, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    References

    1. ^ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Property_Week , https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estates_Gazette , https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retail_Week
    2. ^ "Antiques Trade Gazette is the ‘Bible’ of the fine art and antiques industry. It has recently launched an online auction site and expanded into overseas markets." The association of Investment Companies http://www.theaic.co.uk/sites/default/files/hidden-files/AICVentureCapitalProspects2014.pdf
    3. ^ "Antiques Trade Gazette (ATG) is the acknowledged ‘Bible’ of the fine art and antiques industry, a weekly newspaper that has provided the latest in market information, news and analysis to art and antiques trade professionals and collectors since 1971" http://www.burlington.org.uk/art-world/links
    4. ^ "Antiques Trade Gazette is the acknowledged 'Bible' of the art and antiques trade - a weekly newspaper providing the latest in market information, news and analysis. It is the publication of choice for professionals and collectors around the world." http://www.oliversargentantiques.com/home/links.html
    5. ^ "Antiques Trade Gazette, the first publication to market art and antique auctions on a national and international basis and the leading publication in its field. The weekly magazine continues to be the definitive source of information on and promotion of art and antique auctions, with a solid subscriber base in 42 countries." http://www.firstcapital.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/ATGMedia.pdf
    6. ^ "The UK’s weekly ‘bible’ for all antiques auctions, The Antiques Trade Gazette, is now replete with colourful full page advertisements for Asian sales throughout Europe, and especially Paris." http://chineseart.co.uk/news/chinese-market-booms-in-paris/
    7. ^ "The publication is considered an important source of information for those in the field of antiques, such as Fiona Bruce, presenter of the Antiques Roadshow." http://www.mediamergers.co.uk/eci-to-buy-antiques-bible-maker-atg/
    8. ^ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Burlington_Magazine
    9. ^ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/media/10931253/Antiques-bible-strikes-deal-with-ECI.html

    1 January 2017 review of edits by sierpinski6

    Hi, thank you for your help with the article for Amber Atherton, which I recently edited. Could you clarify what you said for me? "not enough major independent news; focus with actual significant news, and no press releases, trivial passing mentions, interviews or other similar". I can certainly add more references, including press releases and interviews, I just wasn't sure where to insert them. I also don't understand what you mean by "trivial passing mentions". [edit: I see you mean not press releases etc.] I did look into pages for similar people, for example Kimberley Garner and Ollie Locke, and I'm sure the reference I have provided are at least to the same standard as theirs. Sierpinski6 (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I have added a couple more references and would be grateful if you would take another look. please note references from major publications including Vogue (one of the most prominent fashion publications world-wide. The fashion industry is one of the largest in the world; a previous comment mentioned the Forbes list as being notable whilst ignoring Vogue’s Digital Power list, which is certainly notable itself); Business Insider (listed on TIME magazines Best 25 Financial Blogs article); Evening Standard (main London newspaper); Drapers (prominent fashion-retail magazine); The Telegraph (major UK nation-wide newspaper). I did not include references to the many news articles available online that are not relevant to the wikipedia article or that only mention trivial matters. I have browsed many wiki articles that contain far fewer and far less wide-ranging references and am frustrated as to why this one is being rejected when the notability guidelines are clearly being followed. If this does not qualify then there are many, many pages that should also be deleted. Thank you for you time, I understand that you value the integrity of this site & I hope my frustration here does not come off as aggressive. Sierpinski6 (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 20:12:19, 1 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Carackus



    Carackus (talk) 20:12, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Dear SwisterTwister many thanks for the prompt review. I must admit I am struggling a bit to come to terms with the various protocols required to create an article. Can you just explain a little what you mean by your remarks. Currently not convincing, needs all additional major independent news; no press releases, trivial passing mentions, interviews or similar. i.e Needs all additional major independent news? Is that external links? i.e links to reviews etc or links to actual music. Are these external links. I thought I had included a lot but maybe not enough. Does the article read like a press release? I have read a considerable number of articles on composers and thought again I had followed a reasonable common temple plate. Yes there are a number of variations but most seem to follow a basic layout. Finally trivial passing mentions, interviews or similar. Can you just clarify this for me. I am very grateful for the prompt review just trying to get my head around the protocols. Does trivial passing mentions refer to the Author section or personal life etc? Do I need to include external links into the author section, i.e. publisher etc? The personal life section was modelled on a different composers page already posted obviously with different content names and places. Thank you so much for the prompt review. Carackus

    Request on 21:07:28, 1 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Mcdonalds12345


    Hello reviewer. Thank you for reviewing my article. Please tell me what needs to happen with my article. Thank you McDonalds12345

    Mcdonalds12345 (talk) 21:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    21:22:15, 1 January 2017 review of submission by Mcdonalds12345


    Hi my article was reviewed and denyd. However I have fixed it and it needs to be rievewed again. The site is existing, yet has not been updated for a few years. The website because of that does not explain their 2016 "story"

    BLP prods

    Hi SwisterTwister. You seem to have replaced a BLP prod template with a generic prod template at Lalit Mohan Nath. I'm not sure why you did this, but in general you're not supposed to remove the former without adding a source, and although you added a different prod template, that is effectively what you did. I've now added a source to the article confirming the subject's death. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Cordless Larry He's not a living person because he died in July, thus BLPPROD wouldn't apply. SwisterTwister talk 21:47, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I think the death needs a source for BLP to no longer apply, though. See WP:BDP on this, which states "Anyone born within the past 115 years is covered by this policy unless a reliable source has confirmed their death". Cordless Larry (talk) 21:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    02:03:42, 2 January 2017 review of submission by BritNSmithy


    Dear SwisterTwister,

    I have added a recent spotlight article on Cohen in Crain's New York Business; two Wall Street Journal articles quoting Cohen; a Washington Post article co-authored by Cohen; and a New York Times article featuring Cohen. We can see that Cohen is a "go-to" choice on the subject of career reentry based on the quality and quantity of journalists who turn to her. A new source cites Cohen's TED talk being translated into 26 languages. In addition the Worldcat.org library database shows Cohen's book, Back on the Career Track, is available in 687 libraries worldwide. I also added two independent library sources that cite numerous reviews of Cohen's book by executives and academics at respected corporations and universities.

    I would greatly appreciate your assistance in granting permission to take this article live. Thank you very much.

    --BritNSmithy (talk) 02:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Submission declined on 26 December 2016 by SwisterTwister

    Hi SwisterTwister,

    I have added few references to support my writing. I think you should consider it. Apart of that, i am also trying to improve it more. Please consider it and give me one more chance to make the page live.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Uniworld_Logistics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skumarsys (talk • contribs) 05:09, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Uniworld_Logistics

    Dear SwisterTwister,

    I had gone through your comment. can you please guide me in what kind of references should i put in?. Please help in getting this page go live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skumarsys (talk • contribs) 10:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    11:46:10, 2 January 2017 review of submission by TR6-87


    Hi,

    I'm hoping you can help me a little more. I understand from your comments that the article currently fails on notability but would appreciate your thoughts on what would make a company notable. I am not an experienced Wiki editor and I did think that developing a new technology would be relevant as it's a demonstration of innovation that completely changed an element of ecommerce functionality (and also turning down $100m). Any hep you can give me would be much appreciated.

    Thanks

    TR6-87 TR6-87 (talk) 11:46, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Kristen Harris

    OK, if sources are still too trivial, please decline the page again, but please leave the draft to be worked on. She is still getting awards in her area of music, the latest wider than previous. Maybe in more time she will become notable. I read the list of reasons for pop music noteability and agree she does not reach any of them properly yet, although has bits of several. MerielGJones (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC) MerielGJones (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks! MerielGJones (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    19:16:51, 2 January 2017 review of submission by Taruntaunk1970


    I have modified the draft again for Ajay Data. If he is not notable that who will be, I dont know. He is the person who can given email address for IDN domains that too in 11 languages. The worlds was trying to do it last 16 years. Please look at this point of view.

    Draft:Two-dimensional conformal field theory

    I have sprinkled the draft article with references to a small number of standard sources. The draft article's contents are standard material, and the draft article is not about the history of the subject, so the textbook by Di Francesco et al is an adequate source for most claims.

    Sylvain Ribault (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    02:14:12, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Musicschool



    Excuse me, after spending the whole day creating the page for this recording engineer who has been making significant records for the past 30 years - I got a rejection within 2 seconds of submitting it. Why? I see far less worthy people and subjects on wikipedia , all over the place!

    02:15:27, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Musicschool


    Hello SwisterTwister , after spending the whole day creating the page for this recording engineer who has been making significant records for the past 30 years - I got a rejection within 2 seconds of submitting it. Why? I see far less worthy people and subjects on wikipedia , all over the place!

    02:17:39, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Musicschool


    Hello SwisterTwister , after spending the whole day creating the page for this recording engineer who has been making significant records for the past 30 years - I got a rejection within 2 seconds of submitting it. Why? I see far less worthy people and subjects on wikipedia , all over the place! Could you please let me know what I can do to make this article publishable? Thank you.

    02:40:56, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Musicschool


    Hello, Swisted twister, What does this mean please? "there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else" Thank you.

    Request on 05:02:10, 3 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Mictan236


    Hi there, thanks for taking the time to review my article. I'm not sure I understand "significant coverage." I've read the help article on it, and looked at some other approved pages but I feel like they also included sources that mention their company one off. How can I further improve the page? Also, what kind of information should I include to make it better? Thanks. Mictan236 (talk) 05:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Mictan236 (talk) 05:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for your quick response. What is your definition of "significant independent major news"? If the Wall Street Journal does a full length feature about the history and products of the company? Any news article that talks about the company exclusively? Would the news in the controversies section qualify as significant coverage? Mictan236 (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    A bit of confusion on creating my first article

    Hello SwisterTwister, I'd like to ask for clarification on what exactly to do for self-translating a page, as I did with Draft:Transcription of the Japanese language in Esperanto. I've translated the page, but I am unsure how to setup the article. I've added the interlink for the original Esperanto page and I've added sources from two books and a journal written from the University of Virginia. This talk page may be a bit long-winded but I am unsure of what to do.

    Sincerely, Thebitstick (talk) 05:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Submission declined on 23 December 2016 by SwisterTwister

    Hi! You recently rejected an article I tried to post: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:SponsoredLinX Could you please clarify which bits are too much like advertising? This is my first article so bear with me :) I've tried to include only facts and haven't included any puff pieces as far as I can see...I've also tried basing it on approved articles from our industry. You mentioned that Services and Awards was too much like PR, but 'Google' lists its services and products, and Wikipedia lists its awards. So...I kind of don't see why we can't include ours? I've tried basing our article off this one, that is also a digital company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G/O_Digital I also can't see our 'Clients' section? do you mean just the phrase 'an Australian company that delivers digital marketing solutions to small and medium businesses, as well as businesses in New Zealand.'? Would it be better if we listed our clients like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogilvy_%26_Mather Let me know :) and thank you for looking over it! P.S. I'm hoping that this is where I reply to you, let me know if I'm in the wrong place :) MileenaKitana (talk) 05:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Submission declined on 23 December 2016 by SwisterTwister

    Hi! You recently rejected an article I tried to post: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:SponsoredLinX Could you please clarify which bits are too much like advertising? This is my first article so bear with me :) I've tried to include only facts and haven't included any puff pieces as far as I can see...I've also tried basing it on approved articles from our industry. You mentioned that Services and Awards was too much like PR, but 'Google' lists its services and products, and Wikipedia lists its awards. So...I kind of don't see why we can't include ours? I've tried basing our article off this one, that is also a digital company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G/O_Digital I also can't see our 'Clients' section? do you mean just the phrase 'an Australian company that delivers digital marketing solutions to small and medium businesses, as well as businesses in New Zealand.'? Would it be better if we listed our clients like: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogilvy_%26_Mather Let me know :) and thank you for looking over it! P.S. I'm hoping that this is where I reply to you, let me know if I'm in the wrong place :) MileenaKitana (talk) 05:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    Submission declined on 03. January 2017 by SwisterTwister

    I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Crow (Artist). Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Hi David. I don`t understand what you don`t like on my article. I was checking many other article in Wiki and tried to come close as much to that schematic. For example Steve Lee (singer). There is even less information on that page. Please kindly inform specific where the problem is and I will try to improve. Thanks a lot in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crowchild70 (talk • contribs) 06:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Edition on Ahmad Sheibani Nia

    Recently you have done an edition on Ahmad Sheibani Nia's wikipedia which there is no reason for your edition, maybe next time it's better if you use the talk page for any edition you have on this article Soheil sh (talk) 06:36, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Vladimir Pimonov draft

    Hello, I have added new sources and edited the article. Would highly appreciate it, if you could re-review it and help to improve. Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.231.170.90 (talk) 09:54, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 12:12:39, 3 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Mjeltsch


    Hi, this concerns the notablity of the Ark Therapeutics article. I started to translate the corresponding entry in the Finnish Wikipedia fi:Ark_Therapeutics. While translating, I realized that many sources (to online publications) have disappeared during the last years. I have access to the print versions of these newspaper articles, but the online archive of the newspaper in question doesn't go back that far in time. How can one make such a source "reliable" (being in Finnish language and only a paper copy, which I cannot simply scan and put online). I will continuing to translate the Finnish version (and update the sources of the original article as much as possible). Ark was on of the first to come up with a biological drug against brain tumors. It is a bummer for those unlucky enough to get such cancers, that due to business decisions and financial trouble the concept was not be developed further. Any ideas how to develop this are appreciated.

    Mjeltsch (talk) 12:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    12:45:29, 3 January 2017 review of submission by AumanC


    Hello! I'm not sure if this will qualify the article to be published, but I added some independent sources (notable Belgian news sites) to the article. You said the article lacked "automatic inherited notability", would that be solved if I added more of these news sources (Belgian/international) that cover the company Teamleader or events such as an investment, opening of a new office, etc. ? There's also an existing Wikipedia article on "Factory Berlin" that mentions Teamleader as one of the residents that we could link to the page. Looking forward to your reply!

    13:38:53, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Timbullins


    I am requesting a review because I am not sure how my article differs from this one - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Trachtenburg and I think the requirements should be equal. I was told I without a mainstream review I wasn't qualified to be considered an author, yet I fail to find any mainstream review for Milton Trachtenburg either. Have the requirements changed? I have a mainstream traditionally published book in Taiwan which is in the references as well as references to editing work I did. I have referenced my blogs and websites (which clearly show the materials I have published) -- as he did. I have referenced my book (albeit the cover is in Chinese, but my name is not) -- he did. So can anyone tell me why -- aside from the fact I am not the father of anyone in a band or grandfather of anyone else -- one is approved for wikipedia and one is not? Thanks! Timbullins

    Timbullins (talk) 13:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    14:52:26, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Doncaballero2


    Hi SwisterTwister! Happy New Year. I was curious what I need to do to make this entry notable. They're a company in my industry (video) that's quickly becoming an industry standard, and I noticed they were notable by their absence here. I've tried to take out all the PR stuff and just say who they are and who their customers are. I can take out the last paragraph if it helps. Thanks!

    14:55:20, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Doncaballero2


    Hi SwisterTwister! Happy New Year. I was curious what I need to do to make this entry notable. They're a company in my industry (video) that's quickly becoming an industry standard, and I noticed they were notable by their absence here. I've tried to take out all the PR stuff and just say who they are and who their customers are. I can take out the last paragraph if it helps. Thanks! Doncaballero2 (talk) 14:55, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    16:10:48, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Skire913



    Thank you for your feedback on my article "Acute Cardiac Unloading." I have reviewed this article with Wikipedia volunteers, and I have made substantial changes to the language of the article to align with acceptable language consistent with an encyclopedia rather than a journal article. Every section has undergone significant revision.

    Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2016_December_31

    There seems to be a formatting error; can you please fix it? Bearian (talk) 17:35, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 18:48:26, 3 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Thekatherinedonohue


    Hello. Could you please provide your opinion on the subject matter and references for the Brian Cury page? If more references, like the NY Post article, are provided, would the article be considered notable? If not, what would be considered a stronger reference? Perhaps, I'm just not linking to the best resources. Thank you in advance.

    Thekatherinedonohue (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Cell Phone Bikini

    How was removing this page, a single record from a twelve-album series, constructive in any way? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sidewalkfins87 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    20:26:27, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Angela001


    I request a re-review because my article meets the notability status. 

    Firstly,He is an emerging actor that has been featured in Channel News 3[1] which is an independent source.

    His album is on google play [[ https://play.google.com/store/music/artist?id=Ahl5x2ywz6vdqnky7t5xdzrgvu4%7Cstore]] This is a press release about him.[2] Here's another interview on his project as an activist please,All these are not trivial.please, I will like this page be reviewed and accepted.Thanks

    References

    1. ^ wilson, Angela001. "pop-rb-and-soul-singer-marcellino-releases-debut-album". News Channel 3. News Channel 3. Retrieved 3 January 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
    2. ^ wilson, Angela001. "emerging-rb-artist-releases-captivating-new-album". tate music. tate publishing news. Retrieved 3 January 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)

    Review and status of Hardik A. Gohel

    Hi there. I noticed you reviewed the AfC submission for Hardik A. Gohel and deemed it sufficient for inclusion in Wikipedia. The article has now be nominated for deletion because of a lack of notability and the creator has asked for help, since they are - understandably - confused why an article was published if it merits deletion. I gave them some pointers already but since you reviewed the article I thought you might be able to help them in a more specific way. Regards SoWhy 20:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jeff Gulle

    Thanks for reviewing the article so quickly. I was very much on the fence if a 4-time winner of one state's photographer of the year award would be just enough or not. I figured I'd spend 20 mins or so slapping it quickly together to see if it was worth wasting any more time. Thanks for your help. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Regarding Draft:Chris Stuckmann

    So I tried to fix up Draft:Chris Stuckmann, and I feel like the subject's notability is fairly clear. The references from reliable sources such as Uproxx, the Akron Beacon Journal, and WKYC support much of the article's respective inline content. Additionally, the subject's importance is derived from independent and verifiable sources reporting on the subject, and the subject himself has been shown from these to be a popular Internet personality, an author, and a film critic approved by Rotten Tomatoes. Sure, as a stub, the article could use more citations, but it seems alright for a stub at this time. I'll search for more citations, in any case. –Matthew - (talk) 22:53, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    22:55:14, 3 January 2017 review of submission by Cagrap


    This subject is a translation of the german Wikipedia entry about the Hotel Park Weggis (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park_Weggis). There it is accepted. Also I found comparable entries on swiss hotels, translations of german wikipedia entries as well (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolder_Grand; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Hotel_National). Therefore I can not understand the decision to reject this entry about the Hotel Park Weggis. Anyway I did some improvements in the sense of the criticism of Swister Twister.

    RE: Coca Xie Draft rejection

    I'm having trouble making this page stick. She is notable in China, and I have several articles written about her that are in Chinese, but easily translatable. They all outline her career in China, as well as her transitioning to the U.S. I'm confused on why this keeps getting rejected. You are probably very busy, but seriously would like some help. I don't write wiki pages for a living. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:130A:4046:D1E9:E75:4400:56DC (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Elizabeth Kronk Warner

    She is a full professor and associate dean at a prestigious law school, so I de-prodded this stub. Take it to WP:AfD, if you must. Bearian (talk) 23:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:NUUP_Services

    Hello, My draft page Draft:NUUP_Services is reviewed by you, you had requested for major citation. As requested i had included financialexpress.com, thenortheasttoday.com. firstpost.com, indiatimes.com

    Also had gone for live expert opinion and they gave positive comment.

    Would you please review again and let me know if i can resubmit.

    thank you

    Manivannan184 (talk) 03:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC) manivannan184[reply]

    05:01:02, 4 January 2017 review of submission by LaserMan676


    Please do a re-review. I really want to have my first wikipedia page and you know how you have things like Texas gubernatorial election 2012 or whatever. I want those for the mayor of Poulsbo Washington because I love that city. I request that the creators here do election pages for smaller local elections and stuff like that. We need to bring more attention to small local elections and I need your help. So let's start it now with this article. LET'S START THE FIGHT FOR LOCAL ELECTIONS!! WHO'S WITH ME!!!???

    Request on 07:07:44, 4 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Angela001


    Also,Marcellino foster was emerging at that time not presently, he was featured in the national television news , he fulfiled one of the notability status requirement.please consider this


    Angela001 (talk) 07:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 09:07:21, 4 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by LaserMan676


    wait wait wait!! No it's ok you don't need to delete it I wasn't harrassing anybody. I'm very sorry do not delete it. I will fix my mistakes and do whatever I can to get it accepted. Sincerely. LaserMan676. Also I'm an idiot.


    LaserMan676 (talk) 09:07, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    09:33:24, 4 January 2017 review of submission by Iyazhaque


    the major reasons first given for the rejection were that it doesn't have any reference , I have given references which include a very reputable internal medical journal website , and article that cover it . Second is of the largest English news paper of the country , in my option it should cover the objection , if need i can give u the email of the children hospital that he founded you can confirm from them .

    slight tech difficulty

    For some reason, the AfC macros do not always work for me. Rather than doing it manually, I may ask you to help here so everything comes out right. DGG ( talk ) 15:30, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 17:32:22, 4 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by N.godd635


    Hey SwisterTwister,

    I have a query regarding your rejection of the Thomas Sanderson Wiki entry.

    We have removed all the references that qualify as 'company announcements, PR and mentions', but I am confused by what you mean by 'localised triviality.'

    The business Magazine cites Thomas Sanderson as 'Europe’s largest manufacturer and supplier of conservatory blinds, window blinds and shutters.' The article itself does reference Waterlooville but I'm confused on how as a source it is localized triviality.

    Thank you very much for your time.

    N.godd635 (talk) 17:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 18:58:30, 4 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Állatka


    Hi, you declined my article saying that there are still not enough references. What is the required amount? How is it decided? There are many articles on Wikipedia that are less sourced. I've cited almost all publicly available sources. Honestly, making vague comments like this pretty much deters volunteers from contributing to Wikipedia when writers get sparsely reasoned and seemingly arbitrary rejections on otherwise well crafted, if little, articles.

    Állatka (talk) 18:58, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    In your explanation for declining my contribution today, you note three main reasons for your decision to decline. I'll list them with my counterpoint. One, the subject is not notable. The subject is covered in Bloomberg Businessweek, The People's Pharmacy, CNBC News, and the FDA mentioned the company's work in the Associated Press as far back as 2004. Furthermore, its president is a public figure, having published an op-ed in the NY Times and testified before a congressional committee. These news sources and forums are reliable sources, ones that are unrelated to the company. Two, the contribution uses press releases as references. There are no press releases as references. There were in the first draft but not the revision. Three, the contribution is too business like. I've looked to other contributions for guidance and found that companies are described in very straightforward ways to describe what they do. The description of the subject is very straightforward but i'm happy to change it has as you see fit.

    Citronex us (talk) 19:44, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Citronex us (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    I'll note your comment and then explain why I dispute your assessment or have a question.

    Your Comment: The CNBC is simply a news story merely mentioning them and the NYT is still too trivial for the importance needed for notability. My response: The subject did not merely mention them in the CNBC story. The subject is mentioned five times and much of the last part covers the position of the subject's management. What do you mean by the "NYT is still too trivial" for notability? The president of the company published an op-ed of national importance. Also, Bloomberg Businessweek covered the subject and its work. That's major news.

    Your Comment: Also, this Draft itself still only focuses with what the would advertise at their own "About" section and that's not what Wikipedia involves itself with. My response: The contribution includes the basics about the company and its public role on the issue of drug prices, importation and online pharmacies and provides evidence for this role and its notability.

    Your Comment: The People's Pharmacy is then too trivial because it's only a trade publication. My response: The People's Pharmacy is not a trade publication but a consumer focused publication and public radio station with NPR. A Trade publication is a business publication covering an industry, usually for other businesses.

    Please reconsider your decision to decline. Thanks.

    Citronex us (talk) 20:20, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Citronex us Citronex us (talk) 20:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    22:12:21, 4 January 2017 review of submission by 108.18.164.97


    I am requesting a re-review because the subject of this page clearly satisfies the Wikipedia notability guidelines. The subject is a revolutionary leader in the field of sports media - having been the visionary behind the creation of the most successful professional women's sports league in the United States. Beyond that, he is a senior leader of Major League Soccer and has worked with virtually every major entity invested in the sports marketing landscape. I revere this man's work, and feel like my initial submission was declined because I relied too heavily on a source affiliated with his current position at MLS. In my subsequent edits, I replaced such references with high-profile, independent sources including Forbes, Bloomberg, AdWeek and others to avoid any question as to his newsworthiness. I will be happy to make further edits, if necessary, but sincerely believe that a page is warranted for Gary Stevenson. Happy new year and thank you for your attention and consideration!

    Request on 22:16:09, 4 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Mediarmy


    Hi - you rejected my article on the grounds that notability was not adequate. However I had another user vet the notability and approve my sources yesterday. Please note, the article is about my own band, which I will disclose in my talk page, when I figure out how to do it. This was what the other admin instructed me to do.


    Mediarmy (talk) 22:16, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I disagreed with SwisterTwister's assessment; a review by Spin, in addition to the other references, looks significant enough to me. If the topic still falls short, WP:AFD is the place to discuss its merits. Huon (talk) 23:22, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    22:32:42, 4 January 2017 review of submission by JohnJay17


    Happy new year, SwisterTwister. I apologize if this talk page submission is duplicative, as I wasn't logged in for my last attempt and neglected to sign with tildes. In any event, I've requested a re-review for the Gary Stevenson draft because he should comfortably fall within the Wikipedia notability guidelines. Your comments suggested that his notability was not adequately established due to my reliance on a source affiliated with Mr. Stevenson's position at Major League Soccer. I've addressed this by editing the page for concision and objectivity - and by replacing such related sources with high-profile, independent coverage of the subject in Forbes, ESPN, Bloomberg, AdWeek, etc. The subject of this page was the visionary behind the most successful women's professional sports league in the United States (the WNBA). I am unaffiliated with the subject (other than aspiring to work in his field), but can confidently say that he is regarded as a foremost leader and revolutionary in sports media and marketing. He has had a leadership position within MLS, NBA, PGA, the Pac 12 Network, and his own firm - OnSport - which has been featured in the SportsBusiness Journal. He is, in short, a huge reason for the ubiquity of multi-platform sports media across the globe. I will be happy to make further edits to this page, as needed, but strongly believe that Gary Stevenson is deserving of a Wikipedia page. Many thanks for your attention, consideration, and feedback. JohnJay17 (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    AFDs for AFCs

    Happy New year, SwisterTwister. Just a heads up that I have nominated a couple of articles for deletion that you had accepted at AFC. All of the articles written by the editor in question, are Arts Project Victoria artists and aren't notable (yet). This is my first time back editing after a break so sorry if I have overstepped. Best wishes Flat Out (talk) 23:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    My apologies, I should clarified with you first before nominating. Flat Out (talk) 00:41, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 08:32:28, 5 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by LaserMan676


    Please don't delete my article. I know this woman personally and she has cancer. I want her legacy to live on.


    LaserMan676 (talk) 08:32, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello!Please explain

    What did you mean saying: "Nothing suggesting the needed substance in policy to suggest ita own convincing article and this would be best at an existing related article. " You added this comment in the article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Car_app Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by SipleDailyUser (talk • contribs) 10:56, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    About Draft:TPL Direct Insurance

    Hey SwisterTwister. I think it would be a Good Thing To Do to notify new editors about speedy deletion tags. Pete "content editor, and incidentally but not directly relevantly an an admin whose contributions so far may well demonstrate that how conciseness is, while generally considered a virtue, in some cases results in the elision and/or obfuscation of important, significant or otherwise relevant considerations, "Mr concise" AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Suiteness

    You forgot to sign again. Why not use Twinkle it would automatically sign them for you. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 13:57, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    17:43:37, 5 January 2017 review of submission by JohnJay17


    Hi David - Thank you for providing clarity on your position with respect to Gary Stevenson's notability. MLS Business Ventures is not a distinct operation from MLS, but simply the collective name given their business extensions. Within the hierarchy of MLS itself, the subject of the page is still 2nd or 3rd in command overall. Moreover, this is just one of the organizations he has steered. He was a chief executive at PGA, NBA, Pac 12, etc. In his capacity at the NBA, he was truly the driving force behind the very creation of the WNBA (which is substantiated by the sources cited). Also with respect to such sources, my hope in changing references from his MLS bio in favor of high-profile, third-party sources (ESPN, Bloomberg, etc.) was not only to establish independence, but to demonstrate that he is indeed notable and visible for such coverage. You are of course welcome to run an independent Google search on him, but there are clearly many Wikipedia pages (even in the realm of sports) for individuals with a much lower profile. In any event, I will stand by for the results of your next round of review. All the best. JohnJay17 (talk) 17:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Revised entry for Min-on Concert Association has been re-submitted.

    I provided more independent sources and shortened it.Stgrlee16 (talk) 19:03, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Marc Abrams draft

    Thank you for reviewing, however this is not a PR page. There is a CBS covered federal discrimination suit against a town for not allowing a synagogue led by this man, Marc Abrams, who is very notable, and we provide references of such - ran a huge hedge fund that was notable, he himself is notable, and this issue is very notable. We have provided more articles on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faberdasher (talk • contribs) 19:16, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 21:00:53, 5 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Marika Hansen



    Marika Hansen (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Request on 21:19:32, 5 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Ajurisic


    Main argument for declination of my Wikipedia article on Jovan Golić: “The submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources.”

    Questions: Does this mean that the quoted sources are not reliable or that the given reliable sources are not adequately cited? Which given sources are not reliable and why? What is wrong with the rationale given below? What should be improved?

    Rationale: In essence, Jovan Golić is being proposed for inclusion in Wikipedia:
    (1) for his world-recognized contributions to cryptography, most notably in the area of widely used stream ciphers, which are covered by several articles in Wikipedia and where he is known as a world leading expert, and
    (2) for his prominent role as the Action Line Leader for Privacy, Security & Trust in the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT), where EIT is already covered by an article in Wikipedia.

    Item (1) is formulated by three statements:
    “He introduced many cryptanalytic methods for stream ciphers…”,
    “He pioneered cryptanalytic attacks on many widely-used stream ciphers…”, and
    “He is known for his work on…”.

    The statements are supported by:
    (i) wikilinks where his work has been referred to (A5/1, RC4, Bluetooth, MUGI, time-memory tradeoff),
    (ii) selected publications of Jovan Golić in reputable international peer-reviewed journals and conference proceedings,
    (iii) two independent peer-reviewed publications referring to his work on RC4,
    (iv) citation reports by Google Scholar and Semantic Scholar, and
    (v) DBLP publications list.

    All these sources appear to be independent, objective, verifiable, and hence reliable. More precisely, the used formulations “many cryptanalytic methods” and “pioneering cryptanalytic attacks” are undoubtedly supported by selected peer-reviewed publications in premium-class journals and conference proceedings and citations of these publications. In particular, please note that his prominent publications on stream ciphers A5/1 and RC4 presented at EUROCRYPT 1997 contain first published cryptanalysis of these widely used stream ciphers.

    Item (2) is supported by an announcement on the EIT Digital weblink and one external weblink, which are certainly verifiable and thus reliable.

    Please help!

    Ajurisic (talk) 21:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    01:08:58, 6 January 2017 review of submission by Jacopobelbo1234


    Hello--

    Thank you for taking your time for a better entry. I just wanted to follow up on few issues:

    - As you may see in my latest updates to the Sar entry, Mr. Sar meets Wikipedia's novelty criteria in many aspects.

    • Academically:

    - Sar acted as an international advisor to the American Psychiatric Association's drafting of the fifth version of the most influential psychiatric diagnosis manual, DSM-5, in which he significantly contributed to the introduction and modern definition of dissociative disorders;

    - Received more than 4000 citations (see Google scholar),

    - Sar is 105th most impactful scientist in Turkey as per 2015

    - Acted as editor in peer reviewed American, Turkish, and international psychiatry and trauma studies journals

    • Popular newspapers, magazines: As seen in updated citations, he has been interviewed and quoted in numerous outlets over the last decade(in Turkish, English, Dutch etc)
    • On wikipedia: When writing the very important Wiki entry regarding Dissociative Identity Disorders, third party editors have cited Professor Sar's articles 6 times in the relevant Wiki page.
    • Comparing with Ooher similar entries:

    In comparison to other entries, it is clear that Professor Sar should meet the notability standards. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Somer , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%A9rard_Lopez_(psychiatrist). Especially the second entry is remarkable, as the entry regarding the relevant psychiatrist basically uses as the only outside source an article co-authored by Professor Sar to demonstrate the relevant psychiatrist's notability in the relevant field.

    I believe these matters, when taken in consideration, should establish Professor Sar's notability without any doubt. I am otherwise happy to assist you in updating the article in other ways that you may deem appropriate.

    Best.

    05:44:17, 6 January 2017 review of submission by Kangelone



    Hi SwisterTwister, I appreciate you taking the time to review and comment on my submission. However, I was referencing the wikipedia page for Dandenong Market when putting together my page and thought that they ran along a similar line. Are you looking for specific references (should I remove the links from the text and add them under references?)?

    Much appreciated, kathy

    07:42:59, 6 January 2017 review of submission by Kangelone



    Understood :) thanks SwisterTwister! i'll get busy!


    Thanks David for your help! I have worked to the improve the page as per your suggestions and comments, and have resubmitted it for your review. -Grapefruit Grapefruitpeas12 (talk) 09:16, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    09:32:13, 6 January 2017 review of submission by Kangelone



    Hello again SwisterTwister, I have had another go and included independent news links. Do I need to resubmit again for review? Cheers, Kathy

    Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Super-class Star Destroyer

    Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Super-class Star Destroyer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G3 is only for clear-cut hoaxes. This draft is about a certain version of a Star Destroyer. Thank you. SoWhy 11:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Paul Godfey DJ/Producer Draft Rejected

    Hi SwisterTwister, you recently rejected my draft page due to referencing issues. I'm not sure why these references aren't adequate and it would be really helpful if you could explain why they don't show notability and perhaps suggest an alternative? You also say everything else is not satisfying the applicable standards. This is really vague and doesn't help me improve my article. Any feedback you can give would be very much appreciated. Samfov (talk) 12:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    PROJECT in abox Draft Rejected

    Hi, could you please explain to me how this draft page differs from all the other draft pages included in the project management software comparison? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software in fact the page was modelled on this page which is an entry in the list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sciforma the piece I wrote is equally grey and non fluffed and contains very similar refernces. i.e. from other websites, reviews and existing customers. Please explain how these differ and what is requried for a page of this type to be provided? ThanksMalcwest (talk) 17:50, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Please double check...

    ...this page creation and its listing on the daily AfD log. Didn't you notice that something had gone wrong? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 19:27, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    20:39:53, 6 January 2017 review of submission by M.Renae


    Hi, I made a few more edits to the sources on the Simply Gluten Free Magazine page. Could you please re-review?

    Also, if it's still not up to par with the standards, perhaps you could help me find additional sources or tell me which of the sources I've included are good and which are not sufficient. To be honest, there are not very many news media outlets or independent news sources that write articles about magazines in general, unless that magazine hits an all-time record for something, is part of some controversy, is founded by a big-name celebrity like Oprah or Rachael Ray, or is bought or sold by another media company. I've been looking at other publications' Wikipedia pages to see what kinds of sources they use and I'm not seeing that high-quality of sources. I looked at VegNews, which has sources that aren't what I'd consider "independent news sources" and Naked Food Magazine has no sources listed at all. Also, I was looking at Whole Foods Magazine's Wikipedia page and it has 5 sources, 3 of which are its own website and 1 comes up as a 404 error and the other is just a library website that has no mention of the magazine. The sources I've provided for Simply Gluten Free Magazine's page are far superior to the sources in any of these 3 other magazines' pages that were approved by the moderators of Wikipedia, so I would like the page to please be reconsidered.

    Thank you, M.Renae (talk) 20:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&oldid=758666012"