Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Genbosmit (talk | contribs) at 15:53, 2 November 2017 (→BeeBoard: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts
    "WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion

    Codeproof

    Selman Munson & Lerner

    This page was deleted because of a PROD. Nobody at the law firm was notified of the complaint or the deletion. Once the page is restored, we will consider the complaint and make any necessary changes. —74.213.7.194 (talk) 20:33, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    There is no requirement to notify the firm of anything going on within Wikipedia, because it is not "your" article; you have no claim whatsoever to the article or any of its content. That said, the user who created the article was notified, at User talk:Arielgraves. Your firm also has no business making any substantive changes to the article, because you have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.
    Because it was deleted in accordance with WP:PROD, it qualifies for restoration by request, so I have restored it. However, the article looks unsuitable for Wikipedia, so I have nominated it for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selman Munson & Lerner. You are welcome to make your case, grounded in Wikipedia policy, why the article should be kept. Merely existing is not a valid reason to keep an article about a company. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Update: The article has now been deleted again, following the closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Selman Munson & Lerner. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:June Julian

    June Julian was undeleted and moved to Draft:June Julian. The same thing should be done with the talk page as well, which should then be moved with no redirect to Draft talk:June Julian. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:27, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Pstocker13/sandbox

    I, Pstocker13, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pstocker13 (talk) 14:39, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    i wish to correct the errors and try again —Pstocker13 (talk) 14:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Pstocker13: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    eXo Platform

    It is a software company page that exists for years now in Wikipedia, its content is not about advertising a product since the company really exists for years, and it is business oriented with a professional intent this is why we are looking to feature eXo Platform page again —Nour-hm (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Nour-hm: Who is this "we" you refer to? If you have any sort of financial relationship with the firm (employee, paid consultant, etc.), you must comply with WP:PAID to disclose your paid editing status.
    That said, I have deleted the recently-created Draft talk:EXo Platform (Software), restored the original main space page, and reverted it back to a version prior to your changes that made it seem promotional and led to its deletion. Since you seem to have a conflict of interest about this company, DO NOT attempt to make substantial content changes. Propose your changes on the talk page instead. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:33, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Underwater noise pollution

    I, Scottveirs, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Scottveirs (talk) 17:07, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Instructional Technology Coach

    Having worked on this page for many months and hours, mainly relating to the need to write in a more 'encyclopedic' way, now the latest reason for denial of publication related to its supposed lack of 'notability', something I find hard to accept considering:

    A Google search for"instructional technology coach" produces 238,000 results

    A Google intitle search: 1370 results

    Google Scholar search for "instructional technology coach”:

    98 results spanning a wide range of notable, authoritative academic sources

    A Google Scholar intitle search - two results, one book, one journal

    This is just based on the role as described 'Instructional Technology Coach', a search for variations on this nomenclature (described in the article itself) such as 'Digital Literacy Coach' or 'Educational Technology Coach' (EdTech Coach) would lead to a combined total that is far higher.

    If a quarter of million specific references to this specific role does not count as notable, then what does?

    I revised the title of the article based on feedback in order to use a term with more common usage in Northern America, the original title (commonly used in International Schools) is also notable:

    If you Google 'Digital Literacy Coach' you'll see many educational institutions who use this term or the related terms in the article, eg 'Tech Coach' etc. These schools all use the term, and that's not including its derivatives:

    https://www.uwcsea.edu.sg/Learning/Technology http://solutions.asf.edu.mx/jobapplication/Admin/Files/2017%20-%202018%20Digital%20Literacy%20Coach%20announcement.pdf http://manaraacademy.org/jobs/digital-literacy-technology-coach/ http://www.langleyteachers.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Digital-Literacy-Coach-flyer-final-2013.pdf https://www.cis.edu.sg/learning/digital-literacy

    These peer reviewed journals also use/refer to the term: O'Connor, D. L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2003). Today's Coaches Prepare Tomorrow's Mentors: Sustaining the Results of Professional Development. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED482676 Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J., Cramer, J. E. F. F. R. Y., Hanson, L. A. U. R. A., Huang, W., Lee, Y. E. K. Y. U. N. G., ... & Um, E. J. (2005). Professional development coaches: Perceptions of critical characteristics. Journal of School Leadership, 15(1), 52-75. https://books.google.com.sg/books?hl=en&lr=&id=VpYjBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA52&dq=%22digital+literacy+coach%22&ots=idt-SWfzn6&sig=FrDtkuqb6_1P0nqkACFLjs6QpR8 Trainin, G., & Friedrich, L. A. (2014). Technological pedagogical content knowledge in teacher preparation: Impact of coaching professional development and mobile devices. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cehsgpirw/29/

    https://conference.iste.org//2015/?id=94325430 and https://itunes.apple.com/us/book/coaching-for-digital-literacy/id608805196?mt=11 and http://solutions.asf.edu.mx/jobapplication/Admin/Files/2017%20-%202018%20Digital%20Literacy%20Coach%20announcement.pdf will help with that.

    I have yet to receive a reasonable response to this beyond 'because I think so', which strikes me a rather subjective, not to mention displaying a complete disregard for a fellow Wikipedian's work. —MisterMcHugh (talk) 03:08, 26 October 2017 (UTC) --MisterMcHugh (talk) 03:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • I suggest you speak to the deleting admin, User:Premeditated Chaos, or go to deletion review. This process isn't for restoring pages deleted through a deletion discussion. Note that merely being mentioned by a source is not considered sufficient to establish notability, the source has to devote significant coverage to the subject (i.e. devote a substantial amount of text to discussing it) to qualify. Hut 8.5 20:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:2015 European heat wave

    I, Breggen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Breggen (talk) 08:58, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Macrobond_Financial

    I, Pqd, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pqd (talk) 11:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nadia Hashimi

    I, Mr. Guye, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    ONYC Hair

    Per my check the subject is notable, and the deleted administrator said the reason for speedy deletion is because the article has been deleted before, per my check i wasn't the one that wrote the article in 2015, i believe overtime articles should be improved and if there's any issue with an article it should be stated on creating admin's talk page or article talk page considering the stress one has to go through finding sources and an writing an article from a neutral point of view while avoiding Tabloid Journalism, for this reason the deleting administrator's point doesn't seem valid, per Neutral point of view the article should be allowed for more improvements in this case. —Is Nutin 07:00, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

    I am not going to undelete it. It was essentially an advertisement for the company. DGG ( talk ) 17:29, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Riya Kodali

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Anawave (talk) 07:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Anupam Basu

    I, Sougatobose, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sougatobose (talk) 10:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Pon Ondru Kandein

    The film will starting shooting from the second week of November, but I think the deleted article can be resurrected as a draft and remain so until shooting has begun. —Kailash29792 (talk) 14:48, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Kailash29792: Please ask the deleting admin SpacemanSpiff (talk · contribs) if restoring to draft space is OK. Otherwise:
    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pon Ondru Kandein, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user SpacemanSpiff (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:04, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Andy Koçoğlu

    For some reason these were soft-deleted, which opens them up for a refund. This refund came through VRTS ticket # 2017102710003093. As I personally disagree with the close itself (and feel that it should have been an outright deletion) I am posting it here so an un-philosophically-involved admin can deal with it. Please ping me when a decision is made so that I can respond to the customer. Primefac (talk) 17:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Primefac: After looking at the deleted articles and the OTRS ticket, I would say that it would be inappropriate to restore either of these to main article space unless these individuals are actually notable footballersplayers. They were soft-deleted because only one editor Fenix down (talk · contribs) showed up to comment in both AFDs, but that editor left a rather detailed rationale for deleting rather than just a "per nom" comment, so it seems there's a good case against them being notable subjects. Had I closed those AFD discussions I wouldn't have closed them as soft delete. I don't see the problem in restoring them to draft space for the time being, however. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, I'll update the customer. Primefac (talk) 19:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure what restoring to user space will Do, seemed to me like this is an inherently non notable individual. Unless someone is saying that htye think there are additional sources they can use to show notability I think this would be a waste of time. Fenix down (talk) 21:28, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fenix down: @Primefac: Well, the deleted article claims that player is in the highest-possible Turkish ice hockey league, so would be notable if the player performed in professional games and not just sat on the bench as a backup. Therefore notability is uncertain, and unproven in the article, but due to the level of the league, notability is certainly possible. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Notable how? I see nothing at NHOCKEY that suggests he would pass the ANY, so that leaves GNG. Whatxsources have been provided to indicate this is not simply a case of restoring a non notable article to user space? I see nothing to suggest the Turkish league is professional nor anything that suggests merely playing in a professional league is sufficient for the presumption of notability. NHOCKEY is quite clear which leagues are sufficiently notable for players to be presumed notable if they have featured in them and the Turkish league is not one of them. This is a player who must be shown to pass GNG. Fenix down (talk) 22:22, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Stem

    I, AcidPanic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AcidPanic (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Sound Bites

    I, Legosbuild, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Legosbuild (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Suga (musician)

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2A01:598:8081:9D2A:F8EB:5E16:57CC:92E0 (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Department of Arkansas Heritage

    In order to edit and provide additional external sources —23.31.127.201 (talk) 20:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:59, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod

    I, Cdnwpe018, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cdnwpe018 (talk) 01:28, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks, I was working on this page and didn't realize it would be deleted - I firmly believe that the subject Donald Ivan McLeod is noteworthy, many of his contemporaries have pages and I intend to meet Wikipedia's criteria - hopefully with help from some other editors. I'll admit it is only my second page creation, and would appreciate help from the community to ensure that we can help with the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_McLeod disambiguation page. If I could just have the information copied back into my sandbox that would be great! —Cdnwpe018 (talk) 01:34, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi, I've copied the page back to my sandbox and so Draft:Donald Ivan McLeod can be deleted until I've done more on it. Thanks. —Cdnwpe018 (talk) 00:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Heinz Wernicke.jpg

    image was deleted as F5 because article Heinz Wernicke had been redirect but it has now been restored —KylieTastic (talk) 10:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Safaa Hadi

    Improve and add reliable sources "Save page" button below —Mraslat (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Bassim Ali

    Improve and add reliable sources and then click the "Save page" button below —Mraslat (talk) 14:17, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bassim Ali, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 16:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Glenn Mena

    the reason I wish to have the article undeleted is because he is a notable musician and has done many things notable. I found many references to complete the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruth NK (talk • contribs)

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Mena, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 16:13, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Captain Shripatrao Vishwasrao

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Captain Shripatrao Vishwasrao (talk) 09:10, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    It gives the information about the Indian soldier who has shown exemplary performance in IndoBritish army in World war II. Also the Indian hero that he is, is the lost legend, he envisioned a better India, reforming his surroundings with education, opportunities and inspiration.

    Request not to delete the page.

    Draft:Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network

    I, Haneen Adwan, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Haneen Adwan (talk) 13:14, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    makan map

    The Makan Map is the first online interactive and multi-language atlas of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China. It provides valuable geographic, administrative and socio-economic baseline data for this region of Xinjiang in four languages: English, Chinese, French and Uyghur.I am working on the second version of Makan Map —Yoljigda (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Yoljigda: (Non-administrator comment) I doubt that this page ever complied with Wikipedia policies to begin with, though PROD'd pages can be recreated. ToThAc (talk) 15:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Shafeeq Gigyani

    Hi, I hope you will be fine. I want to restore this article, I think it was deleted when he tried this article himself —Wisalahmad523 (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:25, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Robert Weiß.jpg

    Image lost when Robert Weiß (pilot) redirected as F5 - article now restored —KylieTastic (talk) 19:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Martin E. Cirulis

    I, Spoonflower, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spoonflower (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:51, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Vanessa Beeman

    Hi, could you please refund Vanessa Beeman to my userspace (at: User:A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver/Articles/Vanessa Beeman). I am asking the AfD was closed softly, see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Beeman. Thanks. —Dysklyver 22:59, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    2017 Pikeville protests

    I would appreciate if this article could be moved to my userspace. I'd like to see if there's anything there worth merging into the page on Nationalist Front (United States), the group behind the event. The event is briefly mentioned in the "Front" article. Thank you. —K.e.coffman (talk) 02:50, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:ShrinivasKulkarni2016Modified.jpg

    Uploader left a note on my talk page claiming that the image had previously been restored owing to the existence of an appropriate permission, which would also confirm the source. Undeletion requested in good faith. —ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:58, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • The only text on the image description at the time of deletion was "Original file that got proper copyright release and permission from the copyright holder was cropped and color modified for clarity." There wasn't any reference to OTRS confirmation or even an indication of who the copyright holder is. It's possible it might have been restored at another title, that file was never restored. Hut 8.5 07:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Permission for the file from which this image was extracted (cropped) from was present on the original over on Commons, on that basis, I've restored and moved the file to Commons, and added the appropriate ticket number from the original file. If you upload files to both English Wikipedia and Commons, you need to make sure you inform the OTRS agents that there are two (or more) files on two or more projects that need permission added, by default, OTRS agents will only check and add permissions tags on Commons. Nick (talk) 08:00, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Iran Party logo.png

    The image has been deleted for lack of source. I found the source: Investigations of Iran Party on Iran–UK oil agreement, Iran Party Publications (in Persian), vol. 1, 1951. —Pahlevun (talk) 15:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Department of Arkansas Heritage

    I, MimosaTree15, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. MimosaTree15 (talk) 18:04, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Beijing Flickers

    I request to have this page undeleted because this movie is fairly notable in China. Also, the page did have sources last time I read it. If undeleted, I will contribute to making the article larger than a stub and cleaning it up as well. Thanks Goveganplease (talk) 19:13, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto University of Law and Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Dewan University

    I want to restore these article Wisalahmad523 (talk) 08:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • The first one only had the URL of the university www.szabul.edu.pk/, and other stuff was made by a banned user but was not much anyway. So this means it is best if you start writing again from scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Arsalan Taj Ghumman

    {deletia; text of what is presumably the deleted article in its entirety at time of deletion -—Jeremy v^_^v Bori!} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farah Lodhi (talk • contribs) 12:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Posting the entire contents of the article here isn't a valid reason to undelete, and even if it were this page explicitly does NOT overturn the results of deletion debates. As such, to help lower the size of the page, I've removed the article text. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 15:57, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Euromnis

    EurOmnis is a yearly conference for developers using Omnis Studio, last held a couple of weeks ago. It has been renamed Omnis World, http://www.omnisworld.co.uk/ so a change of title would be good. —92.16.110.221 (talk) 13:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Dale Mitchell (ice hockey)

    Hi, could you please refund Dale Mitchell (ice hockey) to me in some way? Then I can work on the article, so it becomes better and more reliable. Thank you - JonasJepsen (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Do you realize that this was deleted twice at AFD? You can see a copy here: https://memim.com/dale-mitchell-ice-hockey.html. You can ask the deleting admin User talk:Ansh666 to userfy it for you perhaps. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:07, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bree Mills

    I'm coming to reedit the page because we now have updates to the criteria for which this articles recieved a negative review. we have awards and plenty of articles to prove notoriety of this page. —Lukus.uhlman (talk) 15:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Glenn Mena (2)

    the reason I wish to have the article undeleted is because he is a notable musician and has done many things notable. I found many references to complete the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruth NK (talk • contribs) 17:39, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. You were told this above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:49, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:I Liq Chuan

    I, Vivliofika, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vivliofika (talk) 20:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Samskip

    I, Samskip, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samskip (talk) 09:35, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Samskip

    We have collected new information from external sources to be placed on Wikipedia. We will put this in the draft version. —Samskip (talk) 09:36, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Pankaj Sahay is a senior political leader and the current national president of the political party Jai Prakash Janta Dal so there should be a Wikipedia Page under his name. Moreover the references put by me in his page was correct so when the information is right the page shouldf be there. —Neel Preet (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    BeeBoard

    Product was granted US Patent #9,753,489 B2 on Sep 5, 2017 and is significant in terms of the evolution of physical bulletin boards as it is the first combination bulletin board that combines physical and digital information. —Genbosmit (talk) 15:52, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=808389607"