Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Qayqran (talk | contribs)
WP:WIKIVOICE
Tag: Reverted
Qayqran (talk | contribs)
Tag: Reverted
Line 14: Line 14:
== Aims and attribution ==
== Aims and attribution ==
[[File:Владимир Соловьёв - 13 (07-02-2022) (cropped).png|thumb|277x277px|Pro-Kremlin TV and radio host [[Vladimir Solovyov (TV presenter)|Vladimir Solovyov]] voiced support for his country's invasion of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news |title=Ukraine War: Russia Is Running an Orwellian Propaganda Campaign |url=https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/.premium.HIGHLIGHT-putin-s-propaganda-channeling-the-rabid-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion-1.10638976 |work=Haaretz |date=27 February 2022 |access-date=13 March 2022 |archive-date=13 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220313204118/https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/.premium.HIGHLIGHT-putin-s-propaganda-channeling-the-rabid-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion-1.10638976 |url-status=live }}</ref>]]
[[File:Владимир Соловьёв - 13 (07-02-2022) (cropped).png|thumb|277x277px|Pro-Kremlin TV and radio host [[Vladimir Solovyov (TV presenter)|Vladimir Solovyov]] voiced support for his country's invasion of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite news |title=Ukraine War: Russia Is Running an Orwellian Propaganda Campaign |url=https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/.premium.HIGHLIGHT-putin-s-propaganda-channeling-the-rabid-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion-1.10638976 |work=Haaretz |date=27 February 2022 |access-date=13 March 2022 |archive-date=13 March 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220313204118/https://www.haaretz.com/world-news/europe/.premium.HIGHLIGHT-putin-s-propaganda-channeling-the-rabid-protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion-1.10638976 |url-status=live }}</ref>]]
Disinformation largely attributed to Russia (both state agencies and [[Russian web brigades|web brigades]]) since the 2014 beginning of the [[Russo-Ukrainian War]] aimed to generate support for Russia, for example by alleging Ukrainian involvement in serious human rights violations.<ref name="MoscowTimes_info_war" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=agencies |first=Staff and |date=2022-05-01 |title='Troll factory' spreading Russian pro-war lies online, says UK |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/01/troll-factory-spreading-russian-pro-war-lies-online-says-uk |access-date=2022-08-29 |website=the Guardian |language=en |archive-date=3 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220803194140/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/01/troll-factory-spreading-russian-pro-war-lies-online-says-uk |url-status=live }}</ref>
Purported disinformation largely attributed to Russia (both state agencies and [[Russian web brigades|web brigades]]) since the 2014 beginning of the [[Russo-Ukrainian War]] aimed to generate support for Russia, for example by alleging Ukrainian involvement in serious human rights violations.<ref name="MoscowTimes_info_war" /><ref>{{Cite news |last=agencies |first=Staff and |date=2022-05-01 |title='Troll factory' spreading Russian pro-war lies online, says UK |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/01/troll-factory-spreading-russian-pro-war-lies-online-says-uk |access-date=2022-08-29 |website=the Guardian |language=en |archive-date=3 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220803194140/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/may/01/troll-factory-spreading-russian-pro-war-lies-online-says-uk |url-status=live }}</ref>


In January 2022, aims of [[disinformation]] ([[misinformation]] intended to deliberately deceive) distributed by Russian authorities included using "wedge issues" to encourage disunity among Western countries in support for Ukraine; to counter themes promoted by the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] (NATO); to create [[plausible deniability]] for human rights violations carried out by Russian forces;<ref name="Politico_UA_conflict_heats_up" /> and to create a [[casus belli]] for further invading Ukraine.<ref name="Guardian_dumb_and_lazy" />
In January 2022, aims of [[disinformation]] ([[misinformation]] intended to deliberately deceive) distributed by Russian authorities included using "wedge issues" to encourage disunity among Western countries in support for Ukraine; to counter themes promoted by the [[North Atlantic Treaty Organization]] (NATO); to create [[plausible deniability]] for human rights violations carried out by Russian forces;<ref name="Politico_UA_conflict_heats_up" /> and to create a [[casus belli]] for further invading Ukraine.<ref name="Guardian_dumb_and_lazy" />

Revision as of 18:47, 16 April 2023

A rally in Sevastopol, April 2022, calling for support in the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The slogan reads: "For the President! For Russia! For Donbas!"

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russian state and state-controlled media has been accused of waging an information war and actively spread disinformation. Disinformation has been distributed by governmental agencies and web brigades of the Russian Federation, the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), and the Luhansk People's Republic (LPR) separatist areas of Ukraine in relation to the 2021–2022 Russo-Ukrainian crisis and the subsequent Russian invasion. Russian disinformation and fake news stories have focused on themes such as false flags claims of Ukrainian and NATO aggression, claims of human rights violations and even genocide carried out by Ukrainians on Russian speakers (such claims often attempt to attribute Russian war crimes to the Ukrainian side), claims that NATO and Ukraine develop biological weapons targeted at Russia, and claims of widespread local populace support for the Russian "liberation". Some of the disinformation has been aimed at promoting hostility towards Ukrainian refugees, intending to weaken international support for Ukraine.

Russian disinformation has been particularly pervasive and successful in Russia itself, due to censorship of war news and state control of most media. While due to the extent of misinformation, Russian media have been restricted from operation and suffered from reputation loss in many Western and developed countries, they have met with more success spreading their point of view in many developing countries. In particular, Chinese state media has been very sympathetic to the Russian side, and has repeatedly censored war news or reproduced Russian fake news and disinformation.

Ukrainian media has also been accused of using propaganda stories, such as the Ghost of Kyiv myth, although such efforts have been much more limited than Russia's disinformation campaign.[1]

Aims and attribution

Pro-Kremlin TV and radio host Vladimir Solovyov voiced support for his country's invasion of Ukraine.[2]

Purported disinformation largely attributed to Russia (both state agencies and web brigades) since the 2014 beginning of the Russo-Ukrainian War aimed to generate support for Russia, for example by alleging Ukrainian involvement in serious human rights violations.[3][4]

In January 2022, aims of disinformation (misinformation intended to deliberately deceive) distributed by Russian authorities included using "wedge issues" to encourage disunity among Western countries in support for Ukraine; to counter themes promoted by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO); to create plausible deniability for human rights violations carried out by Russian forces;[5] and to create a casus belli for further invading Ukraine.[6]

Facebook uncovered a Russian campaign using fake accounts, and attempts to hack the accounts of high-profile Ukrainians.[7] There are reports of paid Russian government staff searching for "organic content" posted by genuine users in support of the Kremlin, while making sure that these do not run afoul of platform guidelines, then amplifying these posts. Researchers have found that the Internet Research Agency (IRA) has operated numerous troll farms who spam critics of the Kremlin with pro-Putin and pro-war comments.[8]

China state media has largely used Russian state media stories and information from Russian officials, including echoing misinformation and conspiracy theories. In March 2022, China Global Television Network (CGTN) paid for digital ads on Facebook targeting global users with briefings and newscasts featuring pro-Kremlin talking points about the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine after Meta Platforms banned Russian state media advertisement buys.[9][10] The same month, CGTN repeated unsubstantiated Russian claims of biological weapons labs in Ukraine.[11] A leaked internal directive from Beijing News ordered its employees not to publish news reports that were "negative about Russia or pro-West." An analysis found that nearly half of Weibo's social media posts used Russia sources which were pro-Putin or described Ukraine in negative terms, while another third of posts were anti-West and blamed the expansion of NATO, while very few posts described the war in neutral terms. Several history professors have penned an open letter that strongly opposed China's support for "Russia's war against Ukraine" but their post was quickly deleted by censors, while a celebrity who criticized Russia over the invasion had her account suspended.[12][13][14]

Due to Russian fake news laws, Facebook and Twitter were blocked by Russian authorities while TikTok banned new uploads. However a study by Tracking Exposed found out that TikTok had blocked all non-Russian content, but has continued to host old videos uploaded by Russia-based accounts and permitted Russian state media to continue posting, described as establishing a "splinternet" within a global social media platform.[15] TikTok's vague censorship has permitted pro-Kremlin news but blocked foreign accounts and critics of the war, as a result "Russians are left with a frozen TikTok, dominated by pro-war content".[16][17]

Effects

Putin and Konstantin Ernst, chief of Russia's main state-controlled TV station Channel One[18]

In February 2022, Eliot Higgins of Bellingcat judged that the quality of Russian misinformation videos had weakened, but remained especially effective for the older generation of Russians.[6]

Some observers noted what they described as a "generational struggle" among Russians over perception of the war, with younger Russians generally opposed to the war and older Russians more likely to accept the narrative presented by state-controlled mass media in Russia.[19] Kataryna Wolczuk, an associate fellow of Chatham House's Russia and Eurasia programme, said that "[Older] Russians are inclined to think in line with the official 'narrative' that Russia is defending Russian speakers in Ukraine, so it's about offering protection rather than aggression."[19] About two-thirds of Russians use television as their primary source of daily news.[20]

Many Ukrainians say that their relatives and friends in Russia trust what the state-controlled media tells them and refuse to believe that there is a war in Ukraine and that the Russian army is shelling Ukrainian cities.[21][22][23]

Some Western commentators have claimed that the main reason many Russians have supported Putin and the "special military operation" in Ukraine has to do with the propaganda and disinformation.[24][25][26] At the end of March, a poll conducted in Russia by the Levada Center concluded the following: When asked why they think the military operation is taking place, respondents said it was to protect and defend civilians, ethnic Russians or Russian speakers in Ukraine (43%), to prevent an attack on Russia (25%), to get rid of nationalists and "denazify" Ukraine (21%), and to incorporate Ukraine and/or the Donbas region into Russia (3%)."[27]

In China,[28][29] India,[30][31] Indonesia,[32] Malaysia,[33] Africa,[34] the Arab world,[35] and Latin America,[36] some social media users trended towards showing sympathy for Russian narratives. A study performed by Airlangga University revealed that 71% of Indonesian netizens supported the invasion.[37] This support was due to affection for Putin's strongman leadership, as well as anti-US and anti-Western political alignments.[38] Additionally, many Indonesians supported Russia due to positive reports of Ramzan Kadyrov and claims of the Azov Battalion covering their bullets with lard to be used against Chechen troops in the invasion.[39][40]

A series of four online polls by Alexei Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation found that between 25 February and 3 March, the share of respondents in Moscow who considered Russia an "aggressor" increased from 29% to 53%, while the share of those who considered Russia a "peacemaker" fell by half from 25% to 12%.[41] On 5 April 2022, Alexei Navalny said the "monstrosity of lies" in the Russian state media "is unimaginable. And, unfortunately, so is its persuasiveness for those who have no access to alternative information."[42] He tweeted that "warmongers" among Russian state media personalities "should be treated as war criminals. From the editors-in-chief to the talk show hosts to the news editors, [they] should be sanctioned now and tried someday."[43]

Russian themes

Numerous themes of disinformation either originated in Russia or favoring the Russian point of view have been reported.

Delegitimization of Ukraine as a nation and state

Russian imperialist, ultranationalist, and pejorative themes about Ukrainians as "Little Russians", "part of an all-Russian nation", or "junior partner in a triune Russian nation" have been part of official Russian imperial rhetoric since the seventeenth century, as well as Soviet policy in the twentieth century. Russian president Vladimir Putin has questioned the Ukrainians people's identity[44] and the country's legitimacy[45] for years and spread conspiratorial views of Ukraine's national identity as an "anti-Russian project" in his 2021 essay "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians".

After the 2014 Revolution of Dignity, Russian rhetoric delegitimized successive Ukrainian governments as the "Kyiv regime", or as a "Nazi/fascist junta",[46] denigrated it as "led by a band of drug addicts and neo-Nazis",[47] and claimed that it is "under external control" by the West or the United States.[48]

Such denial of nationhood has been cited as part of a campaign of incitement to genocide by Russian state authorities.[49][50]

A rally in support of Novorossiya in Moscow on 11 June 2014

Allegations of Nazism

Among others, as a pretext given by Putin for starting the invasion were unfounded comparisons of the Ukrainian government to Nazis while announcing that one of his objectives is "de-Nazification of Ukraine". These allegations were widely rejected by many experts throughout the world as false and as part of an wider Russian disinformation campaign to justify the war in Ukraine, with many pointing out that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is Jewish.[51] The Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum denounced the Russian invasion, saying that "once again, innocent people are being killed purely because of insane pseudo-imperial megalomania", and called for the International Court of Justice to put Russia on trial.[52] The US Holocaust Memorial Museum and Yad Vashem condemned Putin's misuse of Holocaust history.[53][54]

A New York Times analysis of 8,000 Russian websites recorded a sudden spike of allegations of Nazism in Ukraine on the day of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Many analysts pointed out that far-right parties in Ukraine combined received only 2% of the 2019 parliamentary votes in Ukraine, well below the 5% threshold for representation. One expert explained the unfounded allegation about Nazism in Ukraine as an attempt to calm down Russian cognitive dissonance when faced with Russian war crimes, such as the Bucha massacre, "It helps them justify these atrocities", he said.[55] Others have called these allegations as an attempt to incite hatred against Ukraine through establishment of a "fake threat scenario". The Jews of Ukraine similarly rejected Putin's propaganda about Nazism in Ukraine today and in the past.[56]

Statements of denazification continued to permeate throughout Russian media and justification for the war. On 1 March, a large number of diplomats at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in Geneva staged a walkout in protest of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov began his prepared remarks to the assembly via video from Moscow,[57][58] in which he echoed the statements of denazification in Putin's speech: "The goal of our actions is to save people by fulfilling our allied obligations, as well as to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine so that such things never happen again."[59] In a RIA Novosti op-ed published in early April, "What Russia should do with Ukraine", Timofey Sergeytsev argued strongly for the full destruction of Ukraine as a state and the Ukrainian national identity in the ambit of the denazification of the latter.[60][61][62] The Ukrainian state was, according to Sergeytsev, to be renamed after the war.[63][64] The op-ed attracted criticism from as far afield as Slavoj Žižek. In an analysis of the article, American historian Timothy Snyder pointed out that the use of words "Nazi" and "denazification" by the Russian regime was historically inaccurate.[65]

By early May, usage of the term in Russian media appeared to be on a decline, reportedly because it had not gained traction with the Russian public,[66] although the term experienced a slight resurgence when United Russia party member Oleg Viktorovich Morozov called in the Duma for the denazification of Poland later that month.[67] The Russian ambassador to Bulgaria, Eleonora Mitrofanova, has used the moniker "Nazi regime in Kyiv" to refer to the post-Revolution of Dignity administrations of Petro Poroshenko and Volodymyr Zelenskyy.[68]

In May 2022, Aleksandr Dugin, frustrated by "strange and convoluted arguments" used by Lavrov to explain the Russian meaning of "denazification", proposed that it is necessary to simply "identify Ukrainian Nazism with Russophobia". Dugin argued that in the same way as Jews have a "monopoly" of definition of antisemitism, in this way Russia holds a "monopoly" on the definition of Russophobia and "Ukrainian Nazism".[69]

According to Ukrainian-American journalist Natalia Antonova, "Russia's present-day war of aggression is refashioned by propaganda into a direct continuation of the legacy of the millions of Russian soldiers who died to stop" Nazi Germany in the Great Patriotic War.[70]

Claims of Ukrainian and NATO aggression

Spokesmen of Russian state media, the breakaway Donetsk People Republic, or Vladimir Putin have made unsubstantiated claims of aggression by NATO[71] or Ukraine against Russian citizens, including assassination,[3] sabotage,[72] genocide,[73] and the development of bio-weapons[74] including birds carrying fatal diseases.[75]

Assassination attempts

According to Bellingcat, a supposed bombing of a "separatist police chief" by a "Ukrainian spy", broadcast on Russian state television, showed visual evidence of the bombing of an old "green army vehicle". The old car's registration plate was that of the separatist police chief, but the same licence plate was also seen on a different, new SUV.[3][72][6]

On 18 February 2022, the Luhansk People's Republic showed video appearing to show the removal of a car full of explosives that had been prepared for blowing up a train full of women and children evacuating to Russia. The video's metadata showed that it had been recorded on 12 June 2019.[72]

Sabotage attempts

The breakaway Donetsk People's Republic released a video on 18 February 2022 that claimed to show Poles trying to blow up a chlorine tank. The video was distributed further by Russian media. The video's metadata showed that it was created on 8 February 2022, and included a mix of different pieces of audio or video, including a 2010 YouTube video from a military firing range in Finland.[72][6]

Ukrainian intelligence attributed responsibility for the video to the Russian intelligence service GRU.[6]

Genocide in Donbas

In mid February 2022, Russian president Vladimir Putin baselessly claimed that Ukraine was carrying out genocide in Donbas.[73] He said the purpose of the military "operation" in Ukraine was to "protect the people" in the predominantly Russian-speaking region of Donbas who, according to him, "for eight years now, [had] been facing humiliation and genocide perpetrated by the Kyiv regime".[73] Putin's claims were dismissed by the international community,[76] and Russian claims of genocide have been widely rejected as baseless.[77][73][6] More than 3,000 civilians were killed as a result of the war in Donbas, but there is no evidence to support the claim that Ukraine committed the genocide of Russian-speaking people.[73] The European Commission has also rejected the allegations as "Russian disinformation".[78] The US embassy in Ukraine called the Russian genocide claim a "reprehensible falsehood".[79] Ned Price, a spokesperson for the US State Department, said that Moscow was making such claims as an excuse for invading Ukraine.[80]

In March and April 2022, propaganda in the state-controlled media and on pro-Kremlin Telegram channels has falsely accused Ukrainian troops of attacking civilian targets in Mariupol and bombing Ukrainian cities.[81][82][83]

Moreover, the fatality rate of the war in Donbass was actually falling prior to the 2022 Russian invasion: in 2017, there were 117 conflict-related civilian deaths, while in 2020 this was down to 26 deaths, and further down to 25 deaths in 2021.[84]

Biological weapons labs

In March 2022, Russia made unsubstantiated allegations that Ukraine was developing biological weapons in a network of labs linked to the US.[74] The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China and Chinese state media amplified Russian claims.[85][86][87] QAnon promoters were also echoing the disinformation.[88][89][90] BBC Reality Check found no evidence supporting the claims.[91] The United Nations also refuted the claim.[89][92] Russian biologists in and outside of Russia have debunked the claims, stating that the allegations are "transparently false".[93]

According to researcher Adam Rawnsley, the Kremlin has a history of discrediting ordinary biology labs in former Soviet republics, having previously spread conspiracy theories about Georgia and Kazakhstan similar to the accusations deployed against Ukraine.[94][95]

Birds as bio-weapons

Prior to March 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defense had made unsubstantiated accusations that the United States was manufacturing bio-weapons in Ukraine. In March, the Ministry followed up with another conspiracy theory, which claims that the U.S. is training birds in Ukraine to spread disease among Russian citizens, according to a statement given by Major General Igor Konashenkov, spokesman of the Ministry to Russian state-controlled media. Specific details were given about diseases involved, including the name of a specific strain of flu with 50% mortality, as well as Newcastle disease. Media reports included maps, documents, and photos of birds with American military insignia, and also claimed that live, infected birds had been captured in eastern Ukraine.[75][96][97]

The claims were laughed off by U.S. State Department spokesman, who called them "outright lies", "total nonsense", "absurd", "laughable" and "propaganda". Director of the CIA William Burns told the U.S. Senate that Russia was using such claims to prepare the terrain for a biological or chemical attack by Russian forces against Ukraine, which they would then blame on the United States and Ukraine.[75][96]

Combat-mosquitoes

On 28 October 2022, Vasily Nebenzya, the Permanent Representative of Russia to the United Nations, accused Ukraine of using drones with "combat mosquitoes" which spread "dangerous viruses". Andrii Yermak, the Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine, laughed off these accusations.[98]

Ukrainian plans to use a dirty bomb

In March 2022, Russian state-controlled news agencies claimed, without evidence, that Ukraine was developing a plutonium-based dirty bomb nuclear weapon at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant.[99]

In a series of calls to foreign defense officials made in October 2022, Russian Minister of Defence Sergei Shoigu similarly claimed that Ukraine was preparing a "provocation" involving the use of a dirty bomb.[100][101] The Institute for the Study of War suggested a desire to slow or suspend foreign aid to Ukraine as a possible motive for the allegations.[100] The foreign ministries of France, the United Kingdom and the United States rejected "Russia's transparently false allegations".[100] In a briefing, the Russian Ministry of Defence used photos of the Beloyarsk Nuclear Power Station, the Novosibirsk Chemical Concentrates Plant, the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, and a photo from a 2010 presentation by the Slovenian Radioactive Waste Management Agency [sl] as "evidence" for its claims.[102]

Claimed success of Russian efforts

Flight and surrender of Ukrainian President

The Russian state media agency TASS claimed that Zelenskyy fled Kyiv following the invasion and also that he had surrendered. Zelenskyy used social media to post statements, videos and photos to counter the Russian disinformation.[103][104]

Russian state-owned television channel Russia-1 spread false claims that Volodymyr Zelenskyy fled Ukraine following the 10 October 2022 missile strikes.[105]

Other claims

Ukrainian satanism and use of black magic

In May 2022, as the invasion continued, Russian state media claimed that Ukraine was using black magic to fend off the Russian military. RIA Novosti claimed that evidence of black magic had been found in an eastern Ukrainian village; according to their report, Ukrainian soldiers had allegedly consecrated their "weapons with blood magick" at a location with a "satanic seal".[106][107]

In October 2022, assistant secretary of the Security Council of Russia Aleksey Pavlov called for the "de-Satanization" of Ukraine, claiming that the country had turned into a "totalitarian hypersect".[108] In an article for the Russian state-owned Argumenty i Fakty newspaper, he identified the Chabad-Lubavitch Hasidic movement as one of the "hundreds of neo-pagan cults" operating in Ukraine. Russia's chief rabbi Berel Lazar wrote a letter to Russian authorities, asking them to condemn Aleksey Pavlov's comments, which he described as "a new variety of old blood libels".[109] About 70% of Ukrainians are religious, and half of those attend religious services.[110]

False flag fakes

In March 2022, videos were discovered purporting to show Ukrainian-produced disinformation about missile strikes inside Ukraine which were then "debunked" as some other event outside Ukraine. However, this may be the first case of a disinformation false-flag operation,[111] as the original, supposedly "Ukraine-produced" disinformation was never disseminated by anyone, and was in fact preventive disinformation created specifically to be debunked and cause confusion and mitigate the impact on the Russian public of real footage of Russian strikes within Ukraine that may get past Russian-controlled media. According to Patrick Warren, head of Clemson's Media Forensics Hub, "It's like Russians actually pretending to be Ukrainians spreading disinformation. ... The reason that it's so effective is because you don't actually have to convince someone that it's true. It's sufficient to make people uncertain as to what they should trust."[111]

Olenivka prison massacre, described by most independent experts as a Russian-orchestrated sabotage, has been reported by Russian media as a missile attack by Ukraine. While the exact cause of the incident has still not been conclusively confirmed, most experts conclude the Russian version highly improbable.[112][113][114][115]

Anti-refugee sentiments

Russian disinformation has also attempted to promote anti-refugee sentiments in Poland and other countries dealing with the influx of mostly Ukrainian refugees from the war. Social media accounts identified as having ties to Russia have promoted stories including claims of refugees committing crimes or being unfairly privileged, or about locals discriminating against refugees (in particular, against black and non-Ukrainian refugees). Such disinformation is intended to weaken international support for Ukraine.[116][117][118][119]

News masquerading as Western coverage

During the crisis, a number of fabricated CNN headlines and stories went viral on social media.[120] Misinformation spread on social media included a faked image of CNN reporting that Steven Seagal had been seen alongside the Russian military,[120] false tweets claiming that a CNN journalist had been killed in Ukraine,[120][121] a CNN lower third that was digitally altered to include a claim that Putin had issued a statement warning India not to interfere in the conflict,[120][122] and another that was altered to claim that Putin planned to delay the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine until "Biden delivers weapons to Ukraine for Russia to capture",[123] as well as a fabricated CNN tweet supposedly reporting on a figure referred to as "the Kharkiv Kid finder" alongside an image that actually portrayed the YouTuber Vaush, who resides in the US and was not in Kharkiv at the time.[124][125]

In addition to fake news with CNN logo, other Western stations have had similar fakes distributed, for example BBC or DW.[126][127]

"Grandmother with red flag"

A video showing an elderly woman holding a Soviet flag to greet the Ukrainian military has been widely spread in Runet since March 2022. The grandmother with a red flag was turned into an iconic image by Russian propaganda. Allegedly, it represents the desire of "ordinary Ukrainians" to reunite with their "Russian brothers".[128]

Anna Ivanovna, the subject of the "grandmother with red flag" video, explained that she mistook the Ukrainian military for Russian invaders and she wanted to "placate" them with a red Bolshevik flag so they would not destroy the village. She now regrets it and feels like a "traitor".[129] Her house near Kharkiv was destroyed by the Russian army, and she and her husband have been evacuated. She cursed the Russian army which she deemed was responsible for shelling her house. The Ukrainian military appealed to the public to not chastise Ivanovna, who was a victim herself.[128][130]

Denial of Russian war crimes

Exhumed victims of the Bucha massacre, April 2022

During the Russian invasion of Ukraine, numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity were recorded and extensively documented, including attacks on civilians and energy-related infrastructure, wilful killings, unlawful confinement, torture, rape, unlawful transfers and deportations of children, and others.[131][132][133] Despite this, Russian officials denied all of the war crimes perpetrated by the Russian forces. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov called the Bucha massacre a "fake attack" used against Russia, claiming it had been staged. He said that Russian forces had left Bucha on 30 March while evidence of killings had emerged, according to him, four days later.[134][135]

On 4 April, at the United Nations, the Russian representative Vasily Nebenzya said that the bodies in the videos were not there before the Russian forces withdrew from Bucha.[136] This was contradicted by satellite images which showed that the bodies were there as early as 19 March;[137] the position of the corpses in the satellite images match the smartphone photos taken in early April.[138]

The Russian Defence Ministry's Telegram channel reposted a report stating Russian forces had not targeted civilians during the battle. According to the statement, a massacre could not have been covered up by the Russian military, and the mass grave in the city was filled with victims of Ukrainian airstrikes. The Ministry said it had analyzed a video purporting to show the bodies of dead civilians in Bucha, and said the corpses filmed were moving. This claim was investigated by the BBC's Moscow Department, which concluded there was no evidence the video had been staged.[139] During the Mariupol theatre airstrike, Russian officials blamed Ukrainian forces of bombing themselves,[140] though independent sources confirmed that Russia was responsible.[141]

Ukrainian themes

The Ghost of Kyiv

On the second day of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, videos and picture went viral on social media, with claims that a Ukrainian pilot nicknamed the "Ghost of Kyiv" had shot down 6 Russian fighter jets in the first 30 hours of the war. However, there have been no credible evidence that he existed.[1][142] A video of the alleged pilot was shared on Facebook and the official Twitter account of the Ukrainian Ministry of Defence, was later found to be from the video game Digital Combat Simulator World.[143][144] An altered photo was also shared by the former president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko.[145] On 30 April 2022, Ukrainian Air Force asked the "Ukrainian community not to neglect the basic rules of information hygiene" and to "check the sources of information, before spreading it",[146] stating that the Ghost of Kyiv "embodies the collective spirit of the highly qualified pilots of the Tactical Aviation Brigade who are successfully defending Kyiv and the region".[147]

Snake Island campaign

On 24 February 2022, the Ukrainian newspaper Ukrainska Pravda published a viral audio recording in which the crew of a Russian warship offered Ukrainian border guards on Serpent Island to surrender to the Russian forces. One of the border guards responded by saying, "Russian warship, go fuck yourself".[1]

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced the death of the border guards. A few days later, Ukrainian officials admitted that the border guards were alive and had been captured by Russian troops.[1][148] The New York Times stated that "The Ghost of Kyiv" story was likely to be false and that the claim that the Snake Island border guards had all been killed was false, and that both cases were either propaganda or a campaigns to raise morale.[1]

Ukrainian southern counteroffensive

Ukrainian special forces have said that the highly publicized Ukrainian counteroffensive in the Kherson Oblast was a military disinformation campaign aimed at distracting Russian forces from the real offensive that was being prepared in the Kharkiv Oblast. Taras Berezovets, a spokesman for the Ukrainian special forces brigade, said: "[It] was a big special disinformation operation. ... [Russia] thought it would be in the south and moved their equipment. Then, instead of the south, the offensive happened where they least expected, and this caused them to panic and flee".[149]

Others

Turkish mercenaries

In October 2022, a video had been gaining traction on social media allegedly showing Turkish mercenaries going to fight for Russia in the Ukraine war. The video was first published by a pro-Russian Telegram channel claiming that "Turkish legionnaires joined the Russian army and will take part in combat operations in Ukraine". But it quickly gained traction when Nexta shared it with a similar claim. However journalists from Euronews Turkish-language service confirmed that the men are speaking a dialect of Turkish but are not from Turkey. The mix between this dialect and some Russian words signals that these men were most likely Meskhetian Turks (Ahiska Turks). Euronews spoke to a representative of Ahiska Turks abroad who confirmed that the men in the video are speaking the Ahiska dialect. He also told that he believes that these men living in Russia and therefore being mobilised for the war in Ukraine. Adding that, since Ahiska Turks consider themselves Turkish, this is why the soldiers were seen with a Turkish flag in the video.[150]

Russian mobilization

On 22 September 2022, the "conscript base" of the 2022 Russian mobilization from the hacker group Anonymous began to spread in Ukrainian Telegram channels. As it was claimed, the distributed file allegedly contained the passport data of more than 305 thousand Russians subject to mobilization "first of all." It was also noted that Anonymous hackers obtained the data by hacking the website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russia, but the group itself didn't report this leak. The Ministry of Defense of the Russia didn't comment on the alleged leak, but reposted "War on Fakes", a Telegram channel. The report says that the published database "is compiled from several open databases and has nothing to do with the Ministry of Defense." Ruslan Leviev, the founder of Conflict Intelligence Team, and Andrei Zakharov, a correspondent of the BBC News Russian, are of the opinion that the "conscript base" is a fake.[151][152]

Russosphere

Russosphere is a French-language social network that promotes pro-Russian propaganda in Africa. It was created in 2021, but fully launched in February 2022, prior to the invasion of Ukraine.[153] It amassed over 65,000 followers on social media platforms such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, as well as Telegram and VK.[154] The network's posts typically accuse France of modern-day "colonialism", describe the Ukrainian army as "Nazis" and "Satanists", and praise the Wagner Group, a Russian private military company.[155] In early 2023, the BBC and Logically reported that Russosphere was created by Luc Michel, a Belgian far-right activist.[155][156][154]

Release of unproven intelligence

United States officials claimed they had intelligence suggesting that Russia might be preparing to use chemical weapons in Ukraine, a claim that US President Joe Biden later echoed publicly. However, in April 2022, U.S. officials told NBC News that there is no evidence of Russia bringing chemical weapons near Ukraine, that the intelligence was based on weak evidence, and that the intelligence was released to deter Russia from using chemical weapons.[157][158]

U.S. officials claimed that Russia had turned to China for potential military assistance, a claim one European official and two U.S. officials said "lacked hard evidence". U.S. officials told NBC News that there are no indications that China is considering providing weapons to Russia and that the Biden administration made this claim to discourage China from actually providing assistance to Russia.[157][158]

Censorship

In Russia

On 4 March 2022, President Putin signed into law a bill introducing prison sentences of up to 15 years for those who publish "knowingly false information" about the Russian military and its operations, leading to some media outlets in Russia to stop reporting on Ukraine or shutting their media outlet.[159][160][161] Although the 1993 Russian Constitution has an article expressly prohibiting censorship,[162] the Russian censorship apparatus Roskomnadzor ordered the country's media to only use information from Russian state sources or face fines and blocks, and accused a number of independent media outlets of spreading "unreliable socially significant untrue information" about the shelling of Ukrainian cities by the Russian army and civilian deaths.[163][164]

Roskomnadzor launched an investigation against the Novaya Gazeta, Echo of Moscow, inoSMI, MediaZona, New Times, Dozhd (TV Rain), and other independent Russian media outlets for publishing "inaccurate information about the shelling of Ukrainian cities and civilian casualties in Ukraine as a result of the actions of the Russian Army".[165] On 1 March 2022, the Russian government blocked access to Dozhd, as well as Echo of Moscow, in response to their coverage of the invasion of Ukraine by Russian forces. The channel closed, with its general director announcing they would be "temporarily halting its operations", on 3 March 2022.[166]

In Ukraine

In 2021, Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council banned pro-Russian opposition TV stations 112 Ukraine, NewsOne and ZIK. Zelensky's spokeswoman explained that the decision is intended to "protect national security" as the banned stations became "tools of war".[167] In March 2022, Zelensky signed a decree, introducing a "unified information policy" under martial law, uniting news broadcast on national channels into a single platform.[168] Heads of the TV channels rejected accusations that the content is dictated by the government, stating that censorship is focused on withholding information such as Ukrainian military positions. Some commentators noted that airtime is "almost exclusively given to people close to the president".[169]

In China

Coverage of the war in social media was censored in China. The Chinese media have been reported as "regularly quoting disinformation and conspiracy theories from Russian sources".[170]

Countering Russian disinformation

The United States Department of State and the European External Action Service of the European Union (EU) published guides aiming to respond to Russian disinformation.[5] Twitter paused all ad campaigns in Ukraine and Russia in an attempt to curb misinformation spread by ads.[171] European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced an EU-wide ban of Russian state-sponsored RT and Sputnik news channels on 27 February, after Poland and Estonia had done so days before.[172]

Reddit, an American social news aggregation, content rating, and discussion website, quarantined subreddits r/Russia, the national subreddit of Russia, and r/GenZedong, a self-described "Dengist" subreddit in March 2022, after both the subreddits were spreading Russian disinformation. In the case of r/Russia, the site's administrators removed one of the moderators, for spreading disinformation. Sister sub of r/Russia, r/RussiaPolitics was also quarantined for similar reasons. When the subreddits are quarantined, they don't show up in searches, recommendations and user feeds, and anyone who tries to access the quarantined subreddits would be shown a warning regarding the content, which they must acknowledge in order to access it.[173][174]

In May 2022 a group calling themselves NAFO was created with the object of posting irreverent commentary about the war and memes promoting Ukraine or mocking the Russian war effort and strategy using a "cartoon dog" based on the Shiba Inu. NAFO was seen by The Washington Post as having significant effects against Russian troll farms.[175] On 28 August 2022, the official Twitter account of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine tweeted its appreciation of NAFO, with an image of missiles being fired and a "Fella" dressed in a combat uniform, hands on face, in a posture of appreciation.[176]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Stuart A. Thompson, Davey Alba (3 March 2022). "Fact and Mythmaking Blend in Ukraine's Information War". The New York Times. 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 14 March 2022. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  2. ^ "Ukraine War: Russia Is Running an Orwellian Propaganda Campaign". Haaretz. 27 February 2022. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  3. ^ a b c Zaks, Dmitry (21 February 2022). "Information War Rages Ahead of Feared Russian Invasion". Moscow Times. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  4. ^ agencies, Staff and (1 May 2022). "'Troll factory' spreading Russian pro-war lies online, says UK". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 3 August 2022. Retrieved 29 August 2022.
  5. ^ a b Scott, Mark (27 January 2022). "As Ukraine conflict heats up, so too does disinformation". Politico. Archived from the original on 4 February 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  6. ^ a b c d e f Harding, Luke; Roth, Andrew; Walker, Shaun (21 February 2022). "'Dumb and lazy': the flawed films of Ukrainian 'attacks' made by Russia's 'fake factory'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 22 February 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  7. ^ Dwoskin, Elizabeth; Zakrzewski, Cat (28 February 2022). "Facebook and TikTok ban Russian state media in Europe". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022.
  8. ^ "Russia's trolling on Ukraine gets 'incredible traction' on TikTok". TheGuardian.com. May 2022. Archived from the original on 13 May 2022. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  9. ^ Gold, Ashley (9 March 2022). "China's state media buys Meta ads pushing Russia's line on war". Axios. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
  10. ^ Wen Liu, Tracy (23 March 2022). "Chinese State Media Is Pushing Pro-Russian Misinformation Worldwide". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 23 March 2022. Retrieved 23 March 2022.
  11. ^ Rising, David (11 March 2022). "China amplifies unsupported Russian claim of Ukraine biolabs". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  12. ^ "China's promotion of Russian disinformation indicates where its loyalties lie". CNN. 10 March 2022. Archived from the original on 12 May 2022. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  13. ^ "Chinese article urging country to cut ties with Putin gets 1m views". TheGuardian.com. 20 March 2022. Archived from the original on 11 May 2022. Retrieved 12 May 2022.
  14. ^ "What do Russians see on TikTok?". 17 March 2022. Archived from the original on 17 May 2022. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  15. ^ "TikTok users in Russia can see only old Russian-made content". TheGuardian.com. 10 March 2022. Archived from the original on 13 May 2022. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  16. ^ "Study finds TikTok's ban on uploads in Russia failed, leaving it dominated by pro-war content". 13 April 2022. Archived from the original on 13 May 2022. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  17. ^ "On TikTok, Russian state media is still posting propaganda". 13 April 2022. Archived from the original on 14 May 2022. Retrieved 13 May 2022.
  18. ^ "Canada sanctions 10 Putin allies, including Russia's leading TV propagandists". The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists. 8 March 2022. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  19. ^ a b "How do young Ukrainians and Russians feel about another war?". Al Jazeera. 7 February 2022. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  20. ^ "How Russian media outlets are preparing an attack on Ukraine". Deutsche Welle. 16 February 2022. Archived from the original on 28 March 2022. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
  21. ^ "'My cousins are killing one another': War in Ukraine splits mixed families". WION. 1 March 2022. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  22. ^ Hopkins, Valerie (6 March 2022). "Ukrainians Find That Relatives in Russia Don't Believe It's a War". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  23. ^ Lucas, Ryan (6 March 2022). "Relationships across the Ukraine-Russia border feel the strain of war". NPR. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  24. ^ "'Pure Orwell': how Russian state media spins invasion as liberation". The Guardian. 25 February 2022. Archived from the original on 21 March 2022. Retrieved 5 May 2022.
  25. ^ Yaffa, Joshua (29 March 2022). "Why Do So Many Russians Say They Support the War in Ukraine?". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 15 April 2022. Retrieved 5 May 2022.
  26. ^ "Russians in the dark about true state of war amid country's Orwellian media coverage". CNN. 3 April 2022. Archived from the original on 9 April 2022. Retrieved 5 May 2022.
  27. ^ "Russian Public Accepts Putin's Spin on Ukraine Conflict". Chicago Council on Global Affairs. 12 April 2022. Archived from the original on 9 May 2022. Retrieved 5 May 2022.
  28. ^ Dwoskin, Elizabeth (8 April 2022). "China is Russia's most powerful weapon for information warfare". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 19 April 2022. Retrieved 8 May 2022.
  29. ^ Repnikova, Maria; Zhou, Wendy (11 March 2022). "What China's Social Media Is Saying About Ukraine". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 17 March 2022. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  30. ^ "#IStandWithPutin trending in India amid Russia-Ukraine conflict". DT Next. 2 March 2022. Archived from the original on 29 March 2022.
  31. ^ Poddar, Umang (8 March 2022). "How Indians on the internet view India's tacit support of Russia". Quartz. Archived from the original on 21 March 2022. {{cite news}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 29 March 2022 suggested (help)
  32. ^ Strangio, Sebastian (9 March 2022). "Why Are Indonesian Netizens Expressing Support for Russia's Invasion of Ukraine?". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on 22 March 2022. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  33. ^ Azmi, Hadi (19 March 2022). "How Russia and Ukraine are trying to win the battle on Malaysia's social media". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 19 March 2022. Retrieved 20 April 2022.
  34. ^ Gathara, Patrick (23 March 2022). "Why Africa does not appear to be 'standing with Ukraine'". Al Jazeera. Archived from the original on 1 April 2022. Retrieved 20 April 2022.
  35. ^ "Ukraine War: Arab Social Media Unsympathetic, Sees Western Hypocrisy". Newsweek. 7 April 2022. Archived from the original on 19 April 2022. Retrieved 20 April 2022.
  36. ^ Latif, Asad (17 March 2022). "Latin American media respond to Ukraine invasion with mix of deja vu, consternation". The Straits Times. Archived from the original on 17 March 2022. Retrieved 20 April 2022.
  37. ^ Iswara, Aditya Jaya, ed. (15 March 2022). "Kenapa Mayoritas Netizen Indonesia Dukung Invasi Rusia ke Ukraina dan Kagum dengan Putin?" [Why do the majority of Indonesian netizens support the Russian invasion of Ukraine and admire Putin?]. Kompas (in Indonesian). BBC News Indonesia. Archived from the original on 20 March 2022. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  38. ^ "5 Alasan yang Bikin Banyak Warga RI Dukung Rusia Invasi Ukraina" [5 reasons why many Indonesians support Russia's invasion of Ukraine]. CNN Indonesia (in Indonesian). 14 March 2022. Archived from the original on 4 April 2022. Retrieved 20 April 2022.
  39. ^ "Mengapa Banyak Warga Indonesia Dukung Putin Invasi Ukraina?" [Why Do Many Indonesians Support Putin's Invasion of Ukraine?]. CNN Indonesia (in Indonesian). 11 March 2022. Page 2. Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 20 April 2022.
  40. ^ Anggadhitya, Riffa (10 March 2022). "Masyarakat Indonesia Dinilai Media Asing Lebih Dukung Rusia Dibanding Ukraina, Kenapa Ya?" [Indonesian people are considered by foreign media to be more supportive of Russia than Ukraine, why yes?]. Pikiran Rakyat (in Indonesian). Archived from the original on 28 March 2022. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  41. ^ "Anti-war momentum growing in Russia, poll from opposition leader Navalny claims". The Independent. 8 March 2022. Archived from the original on 9 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  42. ^ "Channelling Goebbels: The obscenity of Russian state TV news, as it conceals war crimes for Putin". inews.co.uk. 6 April 2022.
  43. ^ "Navalny Calls for Sanctions Against Russian State Media 'Warmongers'". Moscow Times. 6 March 2022.
  44. ^ "Putin says Russians and Ukrainians 'practically one people'". Reuters. 29 August 2014. Archived from the original on 4 November 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
  45. ^ Marson, James (25 May 2009). "Putin to the West: Hands off Ukraine". Time. ISSN 0040-781X. Archived from the original on 12 November 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
  46. ^ "Disinfo: Ukraine is ruled by a Nazi junta". EU vs Disinfo. 26 October 2021. Archived from the original on 4 November 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
  47. ^ "Putin says Ukraine run by 'band of drug addicts and neo-Nazis'; urges Ukrainian army to stage coup". Global News. 25 February 2022. Archived from the original on 4 November 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
  48. ^ "Disinfo: Ukraine is militarized and under external control". EU vs Disinfo. 7 December 2021. Archived from the original on 4 November 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
  49. ^ Borger, Julian (27 May 2022). "Russia is guilty of inciting genocide in Ukraine, expert report concludes". the Guardian. Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
  50. ^ Baiou, Sabrine (27 May 2022). "An Independent Legal Analysis of the Russian Federation's Breaches of the Genocide Convention in Ukraine and the Duty to Prevent". New Lines Institute. Archived from the original on 16 June 2022. Retrieved 4 November 2022.
  51. ^ Grzegorz Rossoliński-Liebe, Bastiaan Willems (2022). "Putin's Abuse of History: Ukrainian 'Nazis', 'Genocide', and a Fake Threat Scenario". The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. 35 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1080/13518046.2022.2058179. S2CID 250340541.
  52. ^ John Haltiwanger (24 February 2022). "Auschwitz museum says Russia's war in Ukraine is an 'act of barbarity that will be judged by history'". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 24 February 2022. Retrieved 11 October 2022.
  53. ^ Hollinger, Andrew, ed. (24 February 2022). "United States Holocaust Memorial Museum condemns Russia's invasion Of Ukraine and Vladimir Putin's exploitation of Holocaust history as a pretext for war". Washington, DC: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Archived from the original on 25 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022. […] In justifying this attack, Vladimir Putin has misrepresented and misappropriated Holocaust history by claiming falsely that democratic Ukraine needs to be "denazified." Equally groundless and egregious are his claims that Ukrainian authorities are committing "genocide" as a justification for the invasion of Ukraine. […]
  54. ^ "Yad Vashem Statement Regarding the Russian Invasion of Ukraine" (Press Release). Jerusalem, Israel: Yad Vashem. 27 February 2022. Archived from the original on 9 March 2022. Retrieved 4 March 2022. […] the propagandist discourse accompanying the current hostilities is saturated with irresponsible statements and completely inaccurate comparisons with Nazi ideology and actions before and during the Holocaust. Yad Vashem condemns this trivialization and distortion of the historical facts of the Holocaust.
  55. ^ Charlie Smart (2 July 2022). "How the Russian Media Spread False Claims About Ukrainian Nazis". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 July 2022. Retrieved 11 October 2022.
  56. ^ Zoya Sheftalovich (25 April 2022). "Putin wants to de-Nazify Ukraine — that's ludicrous, say the country's Jews". Politico. Archived from the original on 11 October 2022. Retrieved 11 October 2022.
  57. ^ "Watch: U.N. Envoys Stage Walkout As Russia's Lavrov Begins Address". NBC News. YouTube. 1 March 2022.
  58. ^ "Lavrov embodies Moscow's steely posture". AP news. 2 March 2022. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022.
  59. ^ "Russian actions aim to save people, demilitarize, denazify Ukraine – Lavrov". TASS. 1 March 2022.
  60. ^ Mauri, Paolo (5 April 2022). "Ecco chi è Timofey Sergeytsev, il giornalista russo che vuole denazificare gli ucraini". IL GIORNALE ON LINE S.R.L. InsideOver.
  61. ^ Brown, Chris (5 April 2022). "A Kremlin paper justifies erasing the Ukrainian identity, as Russia is accused of war crimes". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  62. ^ Reuter, Benjamin; Stolz, Christopher (4 April 2022). "Russische Nachrichtenagentur ruft zur Vernichtung der Ukraine auf" [Russian news agency calls for annihilation of Ukraine]. Der Tagesspiegel Online (in German) – via Tagesspiegel.
  63. ^ "Ukraine 'to be renamed' after war". The Australian. 5 April 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  64. ^ Ball, Tom. "Russia's vision for renaming Ukraine includes executing rebels". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
  65. ^ Snyder, Timothy (8 April 2022). "Russia's genocide handbook – The evidence of atrocity and of intent mounts". Thinking about... – Opening the future by understanding the past. Substack. Archived from the original on 11 April 2022. Retrieved 1 April 2022.
  66. ^ Gessen, Masha (18 May 2022). "Inside Putin's Propaganda Machine". The New Yorker. Retrieved 24 May 2022.
  67. ^ STROZEWSKI, ZOE (13 May 2022). "Putin Ally Pushes Russia Toward War With Poland". NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
  68. ^ GERASYMCHUK, SERGIY (7 May 2022). "Bulgaria: Hard Choice between Weapons for Ukraine and Unity of the Coalition". European Pravda. European Union and the International Renaissance Foundation.
  69. ^ Dugin, Aleksandr. "Denazification means complete eradication of Russophobia in Ukraine and elsewhere". Archived from the original on 22 August 2022. Retrieved 7 September 2022.
  70. ^ "The 'Death Cult' Keeping Russia in Ukraine". The Bulwark. 1 June 2022.
  71. ^ "Putin blames NATO for pushing Russia into invasion". Courthouse News Service. 9 May 2022. Archived from the original on 11 June 2022. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
  72. ^ a b c d Bowman, Verity (21 February 2022). "Four Russian false flags that are comically easy to debunk". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 21 February 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  73. ^ a b c d e Hinton, Alexander (25 February 2022). "Putin's claims that Ukraine is committing genocide are baseless, but not unprecedented". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  74. ^ a b Wong, Edward (11 March 2022). "U.S. Fights Bioweapons Disinformation Pushed by Russia and China". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on 14 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  75. ^ a b c Villareal, Daniel (11 March 2022). "Russian Conspiracy Theory Says U.S. Training Birds to Spread Bio Weapons". Newsweek. Archived from the original on 30 March 2022. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  76. ^ Stanley, John (26 February 2022). "The antisemitism animating Putin's claim to 'denazify' Ukraine". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
  77. ^ "Ukraine crisis: Vladimir Putin address fact-checked". BBC News. 22 February 2022. Archived from the original on 23 February 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  78. ^ "Disinformation About the Current Russia-Ukraine Conflict – Seven Myths Debunked". Directorate-General for European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (Press release). 24 January 2022. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  79. ^ "United States: Russia's claim of 'genocide in Ukraine' is reprehensible falsehood". Ukrinform. 17 February 2022. Archived from the original on 18 February 2022. Retrieved 22 February 2022.
  80. ^ "US accuses Moscow of creating Ukraine invasion pretext with 'genocide' claims". France 24. Agence France-Presse. 15 February 2021. Archived from the original on 24 February 2022. Retrieved 23 February 2022.
  81. ^ Coalson, Robert (29 March 2022). "'Military Brainwashing': Russian State TV Pulls Out The Stops To Sell Kremlin's Narrative On The War In Ukraine". RFE/RL. Archived from the original on 14 May 2022. Retrieved 11 May 2022.
  82. ^ "Propaganda War Over Mariupol's Destruction Is Only Just Starting". Bloomberg. 22 April 2022. Archived from the original on 11 May 2022. Retrieved 11 May 2022.
  83. ^ "'No one will ever listen to Russia:' Why Ukraine is winning the propaganda war". CBC News. 6 April 2022. Archived from the original on 11 June 2022. Retrieved 11 June 2022.
  84. ^ "Conflict-related civilian casualties in Ukraine" (PDF). OHCHR. 27 January 2022. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 April 2022. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  85. ^ Rising, David (11 March 2022). "China amplifies unsupported Russian claim of Ukraine biolabs". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 11 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  86. ^ McCarthy, Simone (10 March 2022). "China's promotion of Russian disinformation indicates where its loyalties lie". CNN. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  87. ^ "Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Zhao Lijian's Regular Press Conference on March 8, 2022". fmprc.gov.cn. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  88. ^ O'Sullivan, Donie (10 March 2022). "Analysis: Russia and QAnon have the same false conspiracy theory about Ukraine". CNN. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
  89. ^ a b "China and QAnon embrace Russian disinformation justifying war in Ukraine". France 24. 12 March 2022. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
  90. ^ Ling, Justin. "False Claims of U.S. Biowarfare Labs in Ukraine Grip QAnon". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
  91. ^ "Ukraine war: Fact-checking Russia's biological weapons claims". BBC. 15 March 2022. Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
  92. ^ "United Nations Not Aware of Any Biological Weapons Programmes, Disarmament Chief Affirms as Security Council Meets to Address Related Concerns in Ukraine | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases". United Nations. Archived from the original on 22 March 2022. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  93. ^ Mackey, Robert (17 March 2022). "Russia Is Lying About Evidence of Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine, Russian Biologists Say". The Intercept. Archived from the original on 30 March 2022. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
  94. ^ Rawnsley, Adam (18 March 2022). "What You Don't Know About Russia's 'Bioweapons' Bullshit". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on 26 March 2022. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  95. ^ Stronski, Paul. "Ex-Soviet Bioweapons Labs Are Fighting COVID-19. Moscow Doesn't Like It". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on 18 March 2022. Retrieved 18 March 2022.
  96. ^ a b Myers, Steven Lee; Thompson, Stuart A. (20 March 2022). "Truth Is Another Front in Putin's War". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 27 March 2022.
  97. ^ Borger, Julian; Rankin, Jennifer; Farrer, Martin (11 March 2022). "Russia makes claims of US-backed biological weapon plot at UN". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 29 March 2022. Retrieved 29 March 2022.
  98. ^ ""Combat mosquitoes" follow "dirty bomb": Russian representative to UN tells more frenzy lies". Yahoo! News. 28 October 2022. Archived from the original on 9 November 2022. Retrieved 9 November 2022.
  99. ^ "Russia, without evidence, says Ukraine making nuclear 'dirty bomb'". Reuters. 6 March 2022. Archived from the original on 21 October 2022. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
  100. ^ a b c "Ukraine war: Kyiv denounces Russia's 'dirty bomb' claims". BBC News. 24 October 2022. Archived from the original on 24 October 2022. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
  101. ^ Porterfield, Carlie (23 October 2022). "Russian Defense Chief Claims—Without Evidence—Ukraine Could Use 'Dirty Bomb'". Forbes. Archived from the original on 23 October 2022. Retrieved 24 October 2022.
  102. ^ "Минобороны РФ выдало фото российских научных разработок за доказательство изготовления украинцами "грязной бомбы"". The Insider (in Russian). 28 October 2022. Archived from the original on 28 October 2022. Retrieved 29 October 2022.
  103. ^ Klepper, David (5 March 2022). "Russian propaganda 'outgunned' by social media rebuttals". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 6 March 2022. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
  104. ^ Champion, Marc; Krasnolutska, Daryna (26 February 2022). "Ukraine's TV comedian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy finds his role as wartime leader". Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 6 March 2022.
  105. ^ "Российское телевидение сообщило об "бегстве Зеленского" из Киева, но умолчало про жертвы среди гражданских". Agentstvo (in Russian). 10 October 2022. Archived from the original on 10 October 2022. Retrieved 10 October 2022.
  106. ^ "Russian State Media Claims to Discover Militarized Ukrainian Witches". Vice.com. 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 19 May 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
  107. ^ Tuhin Chakraborty (4 May 2022). "Is Ukraine using BLACK MAGIC against Russia? State media claims 'Satanic seal' was found". Meaww. Archived from the original on 5 May 2022. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
  108. ^ "Russia's Security Council claims there are 'hundreds of sects' in Ukraine and demands 'desatanisation'". Ukrainska Pravda. 25 October 2022. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  109. ^ Gross, Judah Ari (26 October 2022). "Russian chief rabbi protests as top official describes Chabad as a supremacist cult". The Times of Israel. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  110. ^ Ambrose, Tom; Ho, Vivian; Sullivan, Helen (26 October 2022). "Russia-Ukraine war live: 'Heaviest of battles' ahead in Kherson, says Kyiv". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 26 October 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022. Vladimir Putin justified the invasion of Ukraine with claims of the need to 'denazify' the country. Yesterday, Russia's security council pivoted from 'denazification' to 'desatanisation'
  111. ^ a b Silverman, Craig; Kao, Jeff (8 March 2022). "In the Ukraine Conflict, Fake Fact-Checks Are Being Used to Spread Disinformation". ProPublica. Archived from the original on 10 March 2022. Retrieved 8 March 2022.
  112. ^ "Russia claims Ukraine used US arms to kill jailed POWs. Evidence tells a different story". www.cnn.com. Archived from the original on 17 August 2022. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
  113. ^ "US says Russia aims to fabricate evidence in prison deaths". AP NEWS. 4 August 2022. Archived from the original on 24 August 2022. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
  114. ^ "Institute for the Study of War". Institute for the Study of War. Archived from the original on 25 March 2022. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
  115. ^ "Ołeniwka. Jak Rosja ukryła zbrodnię wojenna ujawniając ją". oko.press. Archived from the original on 18 August 2022. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
  116. ^ "Internet zalała propaganda z Kremla. "Łączą starą narrację z nową". Jak się nie nabrać? [RADY EKSPERTA]". gazetapl (in Polish). Archived from the original on 22 March 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
  117. ^ "Ukrainian refugees and disinformation: situation in Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and Romania". EDMO. Archived from the original on 5 September 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
  118. ^ Holroyd, Matthew (24 August 2022). "Five of the most viral misinformation posts since Ukraine war began". euronews. Archived from the original on 28 August 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
  119. ^ "Anti-Ukrainian fake news – Special Services – Gov.pl website". Special Services. Archived from the original on 28 August 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
  120. ^ a b c d Dale, Daniel (6 March 2022). "Fact check: Phony images masquerading as CNN coverage go viral amid war in Ukraine". CNN. Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  121. ^ "Fact Check-CNN did not tweet that a journalist was killed in both Ukraine and Afghanistan, claims stem from imposter accounts". Reuters. 26 February 2022. Archived from the original on 28 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  122. ^ "Fact Check-CNN chyron quoting Putin warning against India's interference in the 2022 Ukraine crisis is a fake". Reuters. 27 February 2022. Archived from the original on 12 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  123. ^ "Fact Check-Screenshot of CNN news report about Biden and Russia has been digitally altered". Reuters. 12 February 2022. Archived from the original on 18 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  124. ^ "Fact Check-CNN did not tweet a story about 'the Kharkiv kid finder'". Reuters. 8 March 2022. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  125. ^ Kochi, Sudiksha (11 March 2022). "Fact check: Fabricated CNN tweet about 'Kharkiv Kid Finder' spreads online". USA Today. Archived from the original on 29 March 2022. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  126. ^ "BBC warns of fake video claiming Ukraine carried out Kramatorsk attack". the Guardian. 13 April 2022. Archived from the original on 15 April 2022. Retrieved 29 August 2022.
  127. ^ Welle (www.dw.com), Deutsche. "Fact check: Fake news and content targets international media | DW | 08.07.2022". DW.COM. Archived from the original on 28 August 2022. Retrieved 29 August 2022.
  128. ^ a b ""Grandmother with USSR flag" curses the Russian army because it destroyed her house". Ukrayinska Pravda. 5 May 2022. Archived from the original on 14 May 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  129. ^ Trofimov, Yaroslav (29 May 2022). "A Ukrainian Woman Greeted Troops With a Soviet Flag. Now, She Tells Putin to Stop Killing Ukrainians". Wall Street Journal. ISSN 0099-9660. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022. Retrieved 6 September 2022.
  130. ^ "Babushka Z: The woman who became a Russian propaganda icon". BBC News. 15 June 2022. Archived from the original on 6 July 2022. Retrieved 28 August 2022.
  131. ^ "Human Rights Council: Russia responsible for 'widespread death and destruction' in Ukraine". UN News. 27 February 2023.
  132. ^ "War crimes, indiscriminate attacks on infrastructure, systematic and widespread torture show disregard for civilians, says UN Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine". Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). 16 March 2023.
  133. ^ "Ukraine: Russian forces must face justice for war crimes in Kyiv Oblast". Amnesty International. 6 May 2022. Archived from the original on 6 May 2022. Retrieved 6 May 2022.
  134. ^ "Lavrov slams situation in Bucha as fake attack staged by West". TASS. 4 April 2022. Archived from the original on 4 April 2022. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
  135. ^ "Russia to demand convening UN SC session over Bucha provocation again". TASS. 4 April 2022. Archived from the original on 4 April 2022. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  136. ^ Ball, Tom (5 April 2022). "Satellite images show bodies in Bucha before Russian retreat". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 5 April 2022.
  137. ^ "Bucha killings: Satellite image of bodies site contradicts Russian claims". BBC News. 5 April 2022. Archived from the original on 7 April 2022. Retrieved 4 April 2022.
  138. ^ Hern, Alex. "Satellite images of corpses in Bucha contradict Russian claims". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 6 April 2022. Retrieved 6 April 2022.
  139. ^ "Questions over Russian Bucha denials". BBC News. Archived from the original on 3 April 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022.
  140. ^ "Russia accuses Ukraine of trying to frame it over Mariupol theatre attack". Reuters. 17 March 2022. Archived from the original on 18 April 2022. Retrieved 4 May 2022.
  141. ^ "Ukraine: Deadly Mariupol Theatre Strike 'A Clear War Crime' By Russian Forces". Amnesty International. 30 June 2022. Archived from the original on 9 July 2022. Retrieved 30 June 2022.
  142. ^ Thompson, Stuart; Alba, Davey (3 March 2022). "Fact and Mythmaking Blend in Ukraine's Information War". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 3 March 2022. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
  143. ^ Coleman, Alistair (25 February 2022). "Ukraine conflict: Further false images shared online". BBC. Archived from the original on 7 March 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  144. ^ Czopek, Madison (28 February 2022). "This 'Ghost of Kyiv' clip is from a video game, not a video of fighting in Ukraine". politifact. Archived from the original on 3 March 2022. Retrieved 7 March 2022.
  145. ^ "Fact check: Ukraine's 'Ghost of Kyiv' fighter pilot". Deutsche Welle. 1 March 2022. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 2 March 2022.
  146. ^ "How Ukraine's 'Ghost of Kyiv' legendary pilot was born". BBC News. 2 May 2022. Archived from the original on 4 May 2022. Retrieved 3 May 2022.
  147. ^ Shoaib, Alia (1 May 2022). "Ukraine's Air Force debunks 'Ghost of Kyiv' death, says it is not one man but represents all pilots". Business Insider. Archived from the original on 3 May 2022. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  148. ^ "Kim Iversen Debunks FAKE Russia-Ukraine War Videos Spread Widely On Social Media". The Hill. 28 February 2022. Archived from the original on 15 August 2022. Retrieved 26 September 2022.
  149. ^ "Ukraine's southern offensive 'was designed to trick Russia'". The Guardian. 10 September 2022. Archived from the original on 11 September 2022. Retrieved 15 December 2022.
  150. ^ Sophia Khatsenkova (22 October 2022). "Ukraine war: Are Turkish mercenaries being sent to fight for Russia?". Euronews.com. Archived from the original on 27 October 2022. Retrieved 27 October 2022.
  151. ^ "В телеграме опубликовали "базу призывников" от Anonymous. Эксперты назвали ее фейковой". Meduza (in Russian). Retrieved 12 January 2023.
  152. ^ Чикнаева, Вита (22 September 2022). "В соцсетях появилась "база призывников"". «Бумага» (in Russian). Retrieved 12 January 2023.
  153. ^ "Russia in Africa: How disinformation operations target the continent". BBC News. 1 February 2023. Retrieved 15 April 2023.
  154. ^ a b Bond, Shannon (1 February 2023). "A pro-Russian social media campaign is trying to influence politics in Africa". NPR. Retrieved 15 April 2023.
  155. ^ a b "Russia in Africa: How disinformation operations target the continent". BBC News. 1 February 2023. Retrieved 15 April 2023.
  156. ^ Walter, Kyle; Backovic, Nick. "Kremlin-Tied Propagandists Spearhead New Influence Operations". Logically. Retrieved 15 April 2023.
  157. ^ a b Dilanian, Ken; Kube, Courtney; Lee, Carol E.; Luce, Dan De (6 April 2022). "Bold, effective and risky: The new strategy the U.S. is using in the info war against Russia". NBC News. Archived from the original on 11 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  158. ^ a b Marcetic, Branko (8 April 2022). "The Biden Administration Fed the Press Dubious Intelligence About Russia". Jacobin. Archived from the original on 9 April 2022. Retrieved 9 April 2022.
  159. ^ "Over 150 Journalists Flee Russia Amid Wartime Crackdown On Free Press – Reports". Moscow Times. 3 April 2022. Archived from the original on 8 March 2022. Retrieved 3 April 2022. Dozhd, Ekho Moskvy and Znak have closed down after being blocked by the authorities
  160. ^ "Putin Signs Law Introducing Jail Terms for 'Fake News' on Army". Moscow Times. 4 March 2022. Archived from the original on 14 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  161. ^ "Even Russia's Kremlin-backed media is going off message and beginning to question Putin's war on Ukraine". Fortune. 11 March 2022. Archived from the original on 13 March 2022. Retrieved 13 March 2022.
  162. ^ "Explained: What Russia's war on Ukraine has meant for its news media". The Indian Express. 18 March 2022. Archived from the original on 29 March 2022. Retrieved 20 March 2022.
  163. ^ "Russia Bans Media Outlets From Using Words 'War,' 'Invasion'". Moscow Times. 26 February 2022. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022.
  164. ^ "Use Only Official Sources About Ukraine War, Russian Media Watchdog Tells Journalists". Moscow Times. 24 February 2022. Archived from the original on 24 February 2022. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
  165. ^ "Russian Government Orders Media Outlets To Delete Stories Referring To 'Invasion' Or 'Assault' On Ukraine". Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, RFE/RL. 26 February 2022. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022.
  166. ^ "Russian TV channel says it is temporarily halting work". Reuters. 3 March 2022. Archived from the original on 5 March 2022. Retrieved 4 March 2022. Dozhd (Rain) is temporarily halting its work
  167. ^ "Ukraine: Zelenskiy bans three opposition TV stations". DW. dpa/Reuters. 3 February 2021. Archived from the original on 31 March 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  168. ^ Sauer, Pjotr (20 March 2022). "Ukraine suspends 11 political parties with links to Russia". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 25 March 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  169. ^ Koshiw, Isobel (25 May 2022). "'Death to the enemy': Ukraine's news channels unite to cover war". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 1 August 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  170. ^ Wang, Kai (12 March 2022). "Ukraine: How China is censoring online discussion of the war". BBC News. Archived from the original on 28 July 2022. Retrieved 28 July 2022.
  171. ^ Wagner, Kurt (26 February 2022). "Twitter Pauses Ads in Russia, Ukraine to Keep Focus on Safety". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 26 February 2022. Retrieved 25 February 2022.
  172. ^ Kayali, Laura (27 February 2022). "EU to ban Russia's RT, Sputnik media outlets, von der Leyen says". Politico. Archived from the original on 27 February 2022. Retrieved 27 February 2022.
  173. ^ Yeo, Amanda (1 March 2022). "Reddit has quarantined r/Russia due to misinformation". Mashable. Archived from the original on 1 March 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2022.
  174. ^ Chow, Andrew R. (24 March 2022). "Reddit Moves to Control Hate Speech and Misinformation in Two Forums". TIME. Archived from the original on 19 April 2022. Retrieved 22 March 2022.
  175. ^ Taylor, Adam (1 September 2022). "With NAFO, Ukraine turns the trolls on Russia". Washington Post. Archived from the original on 7 September 2022. Retrieved 11 September 2022.
  176. ^ @DefenceU (28 August 2022). "We usually express gratitude to our international partners for the security assistance. But today we want to give a shout-out to a unique entity – North Atlantic Fellas Organization #NAFO. Thanks for your fierce fight against kremlin's propaganda &trolls. We salute you, fellas!" (Tweet) – via Twitter.

External links