User talk:Durova/Archive 83

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Patrick Street Cork2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 17, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-03-17. howcheng {chat} 17:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		Für Durova. Vielen Dank für Deine Übersetzerdienste neulich. :) JN466 00:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Macht nichts. :) Durova⁴¹² 04:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Drew Napili

Resolved

an fyi; new user dipped an oar right into my business. Jack Merridew 06:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Your suggestion on LISCO IP edits

See Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Transcendental Meditation movement/Workshop/LISCO IPs. Cool Hand Luke 00:44, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the link. Durova⁴¹² 01:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Image license question

Hi Durova. I deleted file:Hayworth.jpg yesterday as it was tagged F9, from http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=4983752&id=312423051210. The user re-uploaded it, and I want a 2nd opinion. Any thoughts? -- Flyguy649 ^talk 16:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Nonfree use rationales almost never stick for living persons. Suggest redeletion as copyvio and opening a dialog with the uploader. Durova⁴¹² 16:24, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Flyguy649 ^talk 16:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Impala mutualim with birds.jpg

Hi, I have put up an alternative. Would appreciate your comments --Muhammad(talk) 16:02, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. Will have a look. Durova⁴¹² 16:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Copyright in the People's Republic of China

Would you please have a look at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Copyright in the People's Republic of China if you have a moment? For your convenience, I will summarize the issue below:

My question at MCQ was whether the images of Nie Fengzhi here are in the public domain. NativeForeigner pointed me to commons:Template:PD-China, which indicates: "According to copyright laws of the People's Republic of China ... all photographs enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation".

The problem arises from the fact that only one of the images (the group photo, which I've already uploaded to Commons) identifies its date of creation. In particular, the date of creation of the headshot (top photo) is ambiguous. One can guess that the image was created and published in 1955 (the year in which Nie attained the rank of lieutenant general), but it would be a guess only. Is that enough, in your opinion, to treat the image as PD, or should I treat the image as copyrighted until 2042 (50 years after Nie's death, since the image was obviously created while he was alive)?

I would appreciate any advice you could offer. -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 20:22, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

The most I could do that you haven't done already is look up Commons:Commons:Licensing#People.27s_Republic_of_China, which is excerpted from the full text at Wikisource.[1] Give it a close look and see whether it covers undated works. I couldn't find a mention (but only skimmed). Durova⁴¹² 20:46, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

There's no mention in the Commons page, but I'll try the full-text document at Wikisource. Thank you! -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 20:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome, and best wishes. Durova⁴¹² 21:47, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

A huge number of medical images

I wonder if you can help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#>23000 pictures to import and the subsequent Radiopaedia section. You're the only image expert I know. Can you help or put him in touch with someone who can? Colin°^Talk 20:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the query. Have replied at project talk. Durova⁴¹² 20:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, I Just wanted to thank you for giving us part of your time at the discussion that is going on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine, and for notifying the OTRS noticeboard. Thank you again :-) MaenK.A._Talk 15:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

You're very welcome. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to assist. Although my time is limited these days this is exactly the sort of thing worth prioritizing. Thank you for your work in this important and encyclopedic area. Best regards, Durova⁴¹² 15:59, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure I ll let you know, and thank you again to give us a part of you little free time. I have a general question regarding talk pages, is it bold or rude to correct indentations of conversations by other users?? MaenK.A._Talk 16:44, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Usually that's ok if it's done for clarity and the words aren't altered. If the conversation is basically friendly no one is likely to mind. Although it's generally better to leave things alone unless there's a pressing need for that. Sometimes people use indentation levels to indicate a reply to an earlier post. Durova⁴¹² 16:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Yea I know the rules of indentations, and as you can see the talk page of the wikiproject medicine is getting messy, as there is no correct indentations, so shall I correct that?? MaenK.A._Talk 16:51, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Totally up to you. :) Durova⁴¹² 17:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

I couldn't stop my self, it looked like a big mess :-), thanks for the help MaenK.A._Talk 17:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Daniel O'Connell2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 24, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-03-24. howcheng {chat} 18:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Randy's donuts1 edit1.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 25, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-03-25. howcheng {chat} 16:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Hopefully a helpful tip

I see that you are putting your signature outside of the resolved tag. Although you place it next to the tag in the wikitext it actually appears peculiarly below it. I think the reason you do this is because you find that the tag doesn't render when you put your sig inside it. The way to fix this is as followed:

{{resolved|1=Closing statement ~~~~}}

Note the "1=" which allows markup in your signature (specifically the equals signs) to play nice with the template. Hope this helps. –xeno^talk 15:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. Durova⁴¹² 15:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

LOC Changes

It looks like the Library of Congress has done a complete revamp of their site. You're probably already aware. Anyway, all of the "source" links are now broken for LOC images. Do you think it would be possible to fix the links automatically somehow (i.e. with a bot)? Jujutacular ^T · C 20:54, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Oh, for heaven's sake. Durova⁴¹² 20:58, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Yea, I'm not sure what would possess them to make such a change. I don't even see any correspondence to the new addresses. Example File:Guiteau cartoon2.jpg:

Was: http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/cph.3g06402

Now: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/92508892/

I hope this won't take a manual change for every picture... Jujutacular ^T · C 21:06, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Hm. Why wouldn't they redirect any of this? Durova⁴¹² 21:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

No idea. Maybe they will, as the change did just happen today. Still seems strange though. If we end up having to fix these, I could see a bot at least making the task much simpler. Should I bring this up at a more central location? Jujutacular ^T · C 21:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Let's try contacting the LoC first. It's after 5pm on the East Coast. So nothing will be done today. The wiki may be collapsing around us, but it seems to have more to do with European servers. Durova⁴¹² 21:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Haha, sounds good. Thanks. Jujutacular ^T · C 21:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

General John Pershing

I would like to solicit the opinion of someone more knoweledgeable about Wikipedia policy than I. The John Pershing article has, for over a year contained, in the infobox, his nicknames of "Nigger Jack", and "Black Jack". As you know, an editor has removed the offensive term. I agree that it is a horridly offensive name, but feel that it should remain, in the interest of accuracy. The editor that removed the name has stated that it would violate WP:CON to return it before the dispute is resolved. It is my position that, because the name stood for over a year without incident, the oppisite is true; it must remain until such time as consensus says that it should be removed. I realize that I am rather new at this, and I do not wish to cause trouble, or violate policy. Am I within my rights to return the name to the infobox whilst the dispute is being resolved? Mk5384 (talk) 04:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Infoboxes have their limitations. This is one of them. Have another look at my post to the talk page; your input appears to be sincere yet also has missed nearly all of the referenced points I was making:

1. In the post-Reconstruction, pre-WWI United States, the "N-word" was far less transgressive than it is today.
2. That particular word has undergone such a dramatic reduction in social acceptability that it must be presented within context, if at all.
3. This isn't because of the word's offensiveness to modern sensibilities per se; it's because twenty-first century readers would not understand its use as a nickname for a white man and would have no point of reference for how it would become a badge of honor to him. Context must be provided or else it is shocking and misleading rather than informative.
4. It may not be possible or necessary to contextualize that moniker adequately within the bounds of WP:NPOV, specifically WP:UNDUE. The nickname is a minor part of Pershing's life and career. A similar nickname in Irving Berlin's biographical background has more than twice the returns on Google Books, yet is not mentioned in his Wikipedia biography.

Durova⁴¹² 04:37, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

I did understand the points you were making, and they certainly hold water. I am in no position to comment on Irving Berlin, but as someone who has studied General Pershing extensively, I know that the nickname was not, in fact, a minor part of his career. I wasn't asking whether you agreed with me that they should be in the infobox. Instead, I was asking if I was violating policy by returning them.Mk5384 (talk) 07:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

D, thanks for your help with this article. I feel all nicknames should be taken out while we get this resolved. An hour before making this post, Mk5384 readded the nicknames in the article. I've removed them again. To avoid this becoming an edit war, I suggest if they are added yet a third time, they be removed and the article protected. It appears only this single user is adament about having that nicknames section. Thanks again. -OberRanks (talk) 12:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Follow-up to this, I restored the material myself and started a vote to avoid an edit war and a protection need. Please participate in the vote if you'd like. Thanks! -OberRanks (talk) 12:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Have weighed in there, although voting isn't the best method of resolving this. Perhaps a content RfC would be better. Durova⁴¹² 18:30, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Image restoration question

Hi Durova - I notice that your FAQ says that if somebody wants you to do image restoration, they should supply an uncompressed TIFF or PNG. Is this just your preference, or is it impossible to do useful work on JPGs? My articles use a lot of images that could do with some restoration, so I'd be interested in learning, but most of them are relatively low resolution JPGs (example). Thanks, Steve Smith (talk) 13:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

JPEGs really aren't suitable for restoration purposes due to lossy compression. Durova⁴¹² 18:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks - I feared it might be so. Steve Smith (talk) 18:30, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

New Photoshop

Have you seen the new Photoshop (jump to 2:50 in the video as the post suggests to see something cool)? The new features might be useful for image restoration. Gary King (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

:) Durova⁴¹² 18:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 02:09, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Durova. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 11:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Durova. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 14:37, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Aventail.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aventail.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Good nomination. This was a very early upload imported from another WMF project before I became aware of the Commons issue noted. Had forgotten it was here. (copying/posting similar comment at the discussion) Thank you for your diligence. :) Durova⁴¹² 19:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 18:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

I need an opinion on a photo from an expert on the subject

I have long been attached to this image of the battlecruiser Frunze, but the image at high res is dreadful. Is there any way that the image could be digitally cleaned up enough to have a shot at obtaining FP status? I'd be happy to list this as a co0nom at FPC if you think its got a chance. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

It's a lovely photograph but it isn't featured picture material. Serious restoration size starts at 10 MB. On rare occasions something smaller passes, but for that sort of work a file isn't really large until it's over 100 MB. If a larger source file could be located the photographers at FPC would go hard on the result of work because it was shot on high speed film, which would have been a reasonable choice during the film era in low light conditions but not the thing to use on a sunny day. You can tell that this is high speed film from the grain at full resolution. That isn't really a correctable problem, at least not in the sense of featured picture criteria. Best regards. Durova⁴¹² 19:46, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Amending that. This might possibly be a scan from a cheaply printed book. In which case a scan from an original print might yield something workable. Durova⁴¹² 19:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

		The Guidance Barnstar
		Haha! That's what I like about asking professionals my questions, you get a direct answer in simple English from someone who knows what they are talking about :) Thanks for the reply, and while I am unsure about where I would find a bigger picture for use an an improvement I am grateful for the upfront feedback, so I am leaving this Guidance Barnstar here as a token of my appreciation for your information on this matter. TomStar81 (Talk) 03:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar

Hi Durova! I feel very Happy and Proud to award you the Special Barnstar! You have been on Wikipedia for a long time and have made many great positive contributions to the project and a true asset:) There are only a handful of Wikipedians who have contributed so much in their precious time and you are one of them! ;) Regards and Happy Editing! See you around :) TheGeneralUser (talk) 10:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

File:BHouse2.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:BHouse2.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Someone else was the original uploader. I did minor edits at his request. Have posted to his user talk regarding your request, but he appears to have retired. Durova⁴¹² 02:38, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

If you're around

Hi Durova! It's been a long time since I left you a note. I was wondering if you knew about the newly formed Editor Retention project? We're looking at ways to help retain users both new users and experienced ones. I'm especially interested in finding ways to help restore users who have significant experience with wp back to the project (see this thread here). If you had any reflections on what keeps you here and/or what contributes to you spending less timer here etc they'd be most welcome. Besides all that I hope you're doing well, best--Cailil ^talk 02:42, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

How to reply to that? "Retained" doesn't exactly describe me; haven't made a mainspace edit in over 2 years. Durova⁴¹² 06:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Well that's why I thought I'd drop you a line - if you had any thoughts on what would get you back to mainspace edits etc. But listen no pressure. If you'd prefer not, no worries :) --Cailil ^talk 14:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

You're very kind to ask. Durova⁴¹² 18:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

• Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi ^{t | c} 17:14, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

A question

Hi Durova. I stumbled across this photo while rewriting the associated article, and wondered if it was a good candidate for WP:FP. There are some small imperfections (dust, what looks like a wrinkle in the top right corner, etc.), so it could use some TLC. I don't know anything about image restoration, or have any specialized imagery software, so I was wondering if you could point me in the right direction. Thanks for any help you can provide. Parsecboy (talk) 13:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

There's a free program called GIMP that can perform all the edits necessary. This is glass plate photography in pretty good condition. Lots of specks, a few scratches, but no major degradation in any critical area. The original photograph needs a small amount of rotation; notice how uneven the horizon is. The histogram also needs adjustment. In spite of the filters that attempt to perform these edits, a really good result has to be obtained manually.

Below are two different restorations of the same photograph. The image at center was a restoration uploaded by a programmer who had spent years coding plugins for the specific purpose of automating photo restoration. The inherent problem with that type of approach is that it would take a breakthrough in artificial intelligence before it could be effective. No matter how a programmer sets the tolerances, current technology compares raw pixel data without a human understanding of context. A filter doesn't know the difference between sky and sandy beach; it can't tell the difference between a surface scratch and the support cables on the Wright Flyer. As you'll notice at high resolution, several of the support cables were obliterated in the automated edit while scratches and dirt remain. The histogram adjustment problems are obvious even at thumbnail.

So if you're asking with a sigh whether that means a good restoration actually goes in at full resolution and zaps every speck of dust manually, the answer is yes. Actually I worked in at least 200% resolution and would use the highest resolution TIFF file available (157.7 MB). The edit on your photo would take me about 8 hours. A first timer usually spends a week.

• 
  A manual restoration of the Wright Brothers' first flight.
• 
  An automated restoration of the Wright Brothers' first flight.
• 
  Unrestored version of the photograph.

Best regards, Durova⁴¹² 20:43, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Many thanks for your help, I can see how this can take a long time. I downloaded GIMP and started playing around with it. How do you fix imperfections? The blur or smudge tools? Parsecboy (talk) 02:07, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Here's a tutorial.[2] Durova⁴¹² 03:13, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

One more thought: these skills you're working on are reusable. Running a first time featured picture candidate is harder than a first time featured article candidate (or that was the case a couple of years ago when I was active) but media volunteering skills have greater reusability. Every image is different, but once you have a grasp of FPC requirements and the software and the medium it is possible to do a large amount of featured level work in a relatively short span of time. Depending on your interests that can be quite useful--the best aspect is the sense of contributing something of lasting value to an important topic. Best regards. :) Durova⁴¹² 04:51, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 09:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

You might be interested in this

Here, I suggested that your idea of having ScienceApologist improve an article by editing it at Wikisource be tried with Peter Damian. Cardamon (talk) 23:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Zahadolzhá--Navaho.jpg nominated for delisting as FP

There're concerns regarding EV, since the image is no longer used in the article, and appears to be unauthentic. Please see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Navajo man in ceremonial dress; thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 14:06, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:47, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2) Your review is required and will be greatly appreciated :)

Hi Durova ! I have started my second editor review at Wikipedia:Editor review/TheGeneralUser (2). I will be greatly delighted, thankful and valued to have your review for me regarding my editing and possible candidate for Adminship. As you are a experienced and long term Wikipedian so i have asked for your kind review. Take your time to review my editing and give the best review that you can :). Feel free to ask me any questions you would like to on the review page itself. It will be a great honor to have you review me for which I will truly feel appreciated and helpful! I always work to improve Wikipedia and make it a more better place to be for Everyone :). Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 19:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:57, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia Medicine

Can I point out the current discussion at the top of User talk:Iridescent? We're forming a new m:Thematic organization and this is one of the pre-incorporation discussions. One concern raised is the potential for undue influence from pharmaceutical companies and quackery. You were active in this COI discussion so I was wondering if you might be interested in commenting, or at least keeping an eye on things. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 03:10, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project and/or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 20:33, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIX, October 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed: The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Nick-D (talk) and Ian Rose (talk) 02:27, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Did anyone notify you?

Hello Durova. this is a clarification request for a case you were involved in five years ago. How time flies! The clarification is not about you, but about email privacy. EdJohnston (talk) 03:06, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Ed. You were the first to breathe a word of it. Much obliged. Durova⁴¹² 00:47, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXX, November 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

RFC/User

Because you are an editor who has participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or a closely related one), I call your attention to discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rhode Island Red.2. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 17:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. Will probably sit this out. Durova⁴¹² 20:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Request for image cleanup

Durova, do you still do image cleanup? If so, would you consider taking a look at File:King the Vice President.jpg? I'm not set up to do it, or I wouldn't pester you. thanks - KillerChihuahua 14:18, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Heavily damaged eyes are possibly the most difficult thing to restore. The human eye interprets that gaze intuitively, but imaging software has no understanding of context. A few misplaced pixels would change the expression.

Took a look at the original from the Library of Congress site. Daguerrotypes carry all the difficulties of other nineteenth century photographic processes with added problems because photography was in its infancy and people hadn't really learned to take care of the delicate print surface. This is a very soft focus portrait. If a restoration were successful it might end up something like the Augustus Washington portrait of Chancy Brown, which was much less heavily damaged before restoration. The only daguerrotype that approached this much damage I worked on was Jenny Lind, which was a better original and I abandoned that project after 30 hours of effort.

Admiral Farragut had less extensive damage to the eyes before restoration. It was still very much a challenge to preserve his steely military expression that balanced great determination with great self-control. This was the man who said, "Damn the torpedoes! Full speed ahead."

The last portrait ever taken of John Quincy Adams was so stained and so faded that had peen passed over for reproduction in modern publications. Adams had suffered a massive stroke while announcing his vote on veterans' benefits for the Mexican-American War (which he adamantly opposed) and it was impossible to move him from the rotunda; he lingered three days before expiring. Are his eyes closed or barely open? That ambiguity is one of the things that makes portrait fascinating, as is the context that this was the very last of the American revolutionaries to remain active in public service. The living memory of a country's founding is slipping out of view as this rough sketch was drawn.

You might want to check out a blog post about restoring damaged eyes. Work on your original would be more difficult than the David Farragut restoration, and in terms of technical challenge on par with the John Quincy Adams restoration. The after version of Farragut and the before version of Adams are posted here (alternates linked through the respective Commons hosting pages). A lot of editors have the mistaken impression that this is done in filters with a few clicks. Actually the featured restorations are manual work, usually done at 200% resolution for clothing and backgrounds but often 500% to 700% for delicate facial expressions. A 12.5 MB TIFF original is on the low end of usable file sizes for that sort of work. There are basically two routes for this project: a quick-and-dirty approach that would yield a low quality result; or else find a very patient editor and treat that person very well. My work was, by and large, taken for granted (and frequently abused) and I stopped donating the effort nearly three years ago. Best regards and best wishes on your project. Durova⁴¹² 21:29, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Dammit, dammit, dammit, I appreciated your skills, why do you think I am asking you? *pout pout pout*

I mean, of course I understand, and respect your decision. Thank you for the time you took to reply in such a detailed fashion as well. If I ever get a computer up and running again I'll definitely read through your info prior to beginning work on this. In the meantime, should you ever change your mind, or feel like a stiff challenge, you know where the image is. Yrs, KillerChihuahua 05:10, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

If you get the chance, GIMP is a good open source program that can do most of the work as well as Photoshop. Something simpler would make a good first project. Seriously, your request is in the realm where the human brain recognizes the patterns, but cleaning up the rest is next to impossible. If I were still an active editor it would be about a 50 hour project pulling teeth all the way. Durova⁴¹² 05:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Durova, it's a good thing to see your name pop up on my watchlist. Sorry for being offtopic. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. :) Cheers. Durova⁴¹² 16:24, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the recommendation. You and I both know it isn't just the software, it is also skill and native ability. KillerChihuahua 19:17, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

happy holidays

Secret ^account is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I hope everything is ok with you, and wishing you and your family a happy holidays. Your expertise is fully missed around here. Secret ^account 04:17, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Merry Christmas to you and yours. :) Durova⁴¹² 05:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year from the Old Guard

Happy New Year from a fellow member of the Wikipedia "Old Guard," meaning yeah, we've been editing here for what feels like forever. I hope things are going well. If you ever need any assistance from me on Wikipedia, please let me know. Best, --SouthernNights (talk) 14:44, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year to you and yours. :) Durova⁴¹² 23:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Image identification

Greetings, The subject, broadly, is camels. A couple of us on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#U.S. Camel Corps (revisited) were discussing how the image you uploaded of a camel unit at Beersheba came to be identified in French as "Cavalerie américaine sur dromadaires à Beer-Sheva." Any ideas? Thanks,--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 00:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Later editors changed the source link and the description. As you can see from the original upload, the original file description was a transcription of an archivist's note at the border of the image frame. It states only, "The camel corps at Beersheba," and does not attempt to identify the nationality of the unit. The image is dated 1915, which as your talk page discussion correctly observes rules out any possibility of it being an American camel corps because the United States had not yet entered the war. Haven't checked the chronology of how or why a later editor decided to claim that this was an American unit, but the most plausible explanation was that someone confused the nationality of the photographer with that of the unit. The American Colony Jerusalem is a treasure trove of public domain photography of the Near East from the early twentieth century; they by no means limited themselves to American photographic subjects. Strongly recommend reverting the image source link and description unless the editor(s) who made the changes produce documentation to justify their alterations. It hardly makes sense to refer the reader to a hodgepodge of 243 photographs for reference, when a direct link is more informative.

Thank you for taking the time to inquire. Best regards. Durova⁴¹² 01:01, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your speedy response. If File:US Camel Corp 1.jpg, which is my first upload, rings a bell, please comment. Don't turn it into a project. I don't think I'll have to fight to keep the image, but you never can tell. Thanks again.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 01:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Best thing to do would be to contact the author of that page and request source information. It would be a wonderful find if true, but Blogspot isn't exactly a reliable source. If it's a book scan you could request a copy through interlibrary loan to confirm and cite that as the source. Durova⁴¹² 02:29, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Songs by songwriter

You have created one or more sub-categories in this scheme which I have nominated for deletion here. This nomination is only on the grounds that there is no corresponding article. If an editor can create a suitable article then there is no reason why the category(ies) should be deleted. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

It was a little confusing sorting through that long list for the one category I had created. Might be simpler to inform the category creator which item is theirs--after five years I had no recollection of Category:Songs_written_by_Ed_Nelson. You'll find, however, that the category does not lack a corresponding article. Durova⁴¹² 15:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

I take your point, but having shown an interest in the category, another editor might reasonably assume you had interest in songwriters generally. BTW You might like to clarify where the main article is, I am none the wiser. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the followup; after reading the full deletion discussion this makes perfect sense. Well done and thank you for your attention to the subject. :) Durova⁴¹² 04:30, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXII, January 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

You Deserve it!

The Original Barnstar

Dear Lise (Durova), Greetings! I wanted to thank you for your years of hard work and dedicated contributions to Wikipedia. Being a former administrator won't take away the rewards and appreciations that you at least deserve :) Also a belated Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! It's because of people like you who edit and contribute their part to Wikipedia to make it a more better place and source of information for everyone. I thank you for your efforts and hope you will continue your wonderful contributions. Warm Regards ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. :) Durova⁴¹² 21:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Durova,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Republican presidential ticket 1864b.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on February 3, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-02-03. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

• BTW, File:Democratic presidential ticket 1864b.jpg will make an appearance next November. Same thing applies. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

• Many apologies, my bad. Fixed above now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:03, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

• You're welcome. I think HowCheng's got a lot on his plate right now, so it's the least I could do. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Layla and Majnun2.jpg

Are you seeing this file covered with cyan? Seems to be a server-side error, but some... helpful soul, for the lack of a non-sarcastic term which passes WP:NPA... suggested we upload anew. Do you still have the restoration? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:53, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Appears to be a color profile issue. Try this version. File:Layla_and_Majnun2_without_color_profile.jpg

And happy Valentine's Day. Perfect timing to ask about a love story. :) Durova⁴¹² 16:39, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks. That one works fine, but the above-linked file is having issues in both Firefox and Chrome (so I was thinking it wasn't a profile issue). Enjoy your Valentine's Day (and check out the POTD for 14 Feb) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Alright, it's been fixed by LX — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your diligence in getting this fixed. :) Durova⁴¹² 19:59, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

• And thank you for your wonderful restorations. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

You're very kind. It's people like you who keep the project healthy. :) Durova⁴¹² 05:13, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Notice of discussiont to revamp WP:FS

As a formerly active discussant at WT:FSC, I would like to call your attention to Wikipedia talk:Featured sound candidates#Proposal to revamp FS.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, Tony. Congratulations on your impressive list of featured sound contributions. Durova⁴¹² 19:57, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 08:11, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

WP:BLANK

I am going over your edits and activities, and noticed you have blanked User talk:Arkhamite. Is this kosher? Is this standard practice per WP:BLANK or some other community policy? To blank other people's user pages? What is the current state of affairs on this? Int21h (talk) 02:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

If you have indeed been going over my edits and activities, then surely you have noticed that I haven't edited mainspace in three years. Please direct your questions to an active Wikipedian. The name you mention scarcely rings a bell, and I am not your servant to be ordered in such a way. Durova⁴¹² 04:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

My good sir (or madam), after reading this conversation and negotiating with Durova I have an offer to make. She is willing to research and an answer to your question if you first explain the decisions you made on April 12, 2007. Bring documentation and be prepared to answer loaded questions from a random stranger. Or if you prefer alternatives, either create a fully disclosed alternate account and earn Wikipedia's Triple Crown or else upload a video to YouTube of yourself dancing the pas de deux from The Nutcracker. _Hamlet, Prince of Trollmark^{bugs and goblins} 06:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Whoa whoa whoa. I came here because you were simply the most accessable and veteran on a topic of concern to me. Jeez. Int21h (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

(edit conflict) To answer the question, yes it is kosher, and can easily be undone if necessary (which it isn't in this case). I am curious, though, why you are concerned about something which happened almost 6 years ago? (see this diff). The edit summaries give you all the information you need: the editor was blocked for making personal threats and other similarly unacceptable actions. It is often the case that the user's talk page is blanked on request and the userpage is deleted on request. I can't say if there was a request, but it's certainly a strong possibility. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:17, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Joe. So it was him? I didn't even remember. Cheers. :) Durova⁴¹² 06:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

If you're asking if Int21h and Arkhamite are related, I'm not sure. Certainly, bringing up such a stale topic as if it was current ("...I am going over your edits and activities, and noticed you have blanked...") lends some credence to that train of thought. I haven't had time to compare and see if there are any ducks around. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 17:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

FWIW this is what the blanking guideline looked like in April 2007. Seems like an attempt to manufacture an ex post facto complaint. Funny that anyone would bother. Durova⁴¹² 06:48, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Yes, that conflict is what brought this to my attention, but I care not about the actual conflict, and just the reasons for the blanking. Durova, this was simply the most obvious example, like I said from an active editor (active in that you were still editing as of within a month.) "It is often the case that the user's talk page is blanked on request and the userpage is deleted on request." And from the comment above, a previous version of WP:BLANK that has been edited away, is why I go to veteran editors. Int21h (talk) 18:20, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

And as to why I am "concerned", it relates to a recent conflict of mine, for which a review of major controversies and actions by "flagged" editors (as in some sort of administrative responsibility) is in order. Again, simply the most accessible and veteran. Int21h (talk) 18:24, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

To Nihonjoe: The OP was asking whether Arkhamite was a well-known banned editor. The Arkhamite userpage links to the ban discussion where no mention of that other editor occurred. It also provides context for why the userspace got blanked--very understandable under the circumstances. So it seems unlikely that Int21h is connected to either account. The odd thing is why anyone would dig back so far in the past to a unanimous and uncontroversial community decision, and then halt at that point to raise a fuss without taking another two minutes to see why it was handled that way.

To Int21h: whatever recent controversy you were in that you think this relates to, it is remarkable that you found that obscure user page without noticing that WP:BLANK had nothing to say about blanking user pages back in early 2007. My edit history has nearly 60,000 actions. The only easily searchable index is at the administrative noticeboard where the ban was discussed, and if you had searched there you would have quickly seen why it was handled that way. I have little idea how standards have changed six years later, although it would not be difficult to imagine that if something that extreme occurred again the end result would have been about the same. Durova⁴¹² 18:38, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

OK OK. I missed the whole discussion about whoever that person was. My bad. I don't care about Arkhamite (yes I obviously know he was banned that much is obvious by the userpage) or the controversy surrounding it at this point. The link to the old policy (it is changed) was what I was after. These controversies are too much for me and it would simply take too long to go through old controversies to determine policy as a first step; it is simpler just to ask the most reasonably informed editor and get shortcuts about a point in question. You obviously think I am wrong, and I would love to answer your question about my question's remarkable-ness but I'm not sure that is really what you want here, so with that goodbye. Int21h (talk) 18:50, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

So how exactly did you find that example, did someone point you there? If "it would simply take too long to go through old controversies," then why search for precedents in the edit history of a former admin who resigned the bit more than five years ago and hasn't edited an article in three years? There's something here you aren't telling. Durova⁴¹² 18:56, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Admin?

Are you an Admin? Dell table (talk) 00:46, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Durova is not an admin, and is pretty much inactive here. I'm not sure what the context for this question is. For future reference, you can type a user's name into the box here to check. If you want more background info, see this arbcom case. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 03:09, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. (she's an appreciated and missed contributor). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dell_table (talk • contribs)

Um, actually I apologized and resigned. Why are you so concerned about something that happened in 2007? Especially since I haven't even edited in three years? Durova⁴¹² 21:00, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Its checkuser blocked now...the past (especially 2007) is the past.--MONGO 21:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Over 400 featured content contributions and this is what people remember...it's the scarlet exclamation mark. ;) Durova⁴¹² 21:43, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Well...its not what I remember.--MONGO 22:59, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, Mongo. You're a trooper. :) Durova⁴¹² 23:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Biscayne National Park languishes at FAC...it could use a set of neutral eyes to help a first time FA nominator out. You always did a good job providing a neutral analysis of articles I thought....if you feel inclined.--MONGO 23:08, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

(outdent) The FAC is a redlink, but it's quite an impressive achievement you've made at that article. Good structure, well referenced. A few suggestions:

• The official park map should be US Government public domain, right? Would be very useful to see a visual outline of the park's boundaries (linked for convenience, can be modified for article display).
• The article introduction gives a misleading impression that the only endangered species within the park boundaries are cacti and palms. One of the more interesting and significant things about this park is the variety of endangered species that live there, including the American Crocodile (definitely endangered, and an impressive creature--one of the world's largest crocodilians). Rather than listing specific endangered species, might be better to provide an estimate of the scope and variety.
• If I recall correctly, south Florida has the only habitats in the world where alligators and crocodiles coexist. Don't have a source for that unfortunately (learned it many years ago) but should be easily verifiable if true. Worth mentioning even though alligators are relatively uncommon within park grounds.
• Are there endangered insects and endangered fish in the park?
• Might be useful to organize the bird population in terms of migratory patterns. Florida is the winter migratory location for a variety of North American bird species and the summer migratory location for several South American and Mesoamerican species. Since it's one of the few major land masses in this part of the world at that latitude that isn't arid, the variety of species is incredible. Could be good to provide an indication of which season various species would be present, as well as a mention of the nonmigratory species (the Snail Kite comes to mind because it's a common site in the Everglades, although am unsure whether apple snails would be found around Biscayne Bay).
• A handful of phrases could use a little proofreading polish. One of the facts most readers would be unfamiliar with is that "island" and "key" or "cay" are essentially interchangeable terms in this part of the world (the latter two originated from the Taino people of the Bahamas). Might be too much of a digression to give the etymology, so not sure how to rephrase "The largest key or island is..." which is a turn of phrase that could easily give the impression that keys and islands are different. Subordinate commas might solve that dilemma. Another much simpler phrasing that needs minor editing is, "as well as an occasional crocodiles..."

Overall, great work as always. Mainly could use a bit of expansion about the ecology. Durova⁴¹² 00:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank You! Excellent suggestions. I recognize that things went sideways for you and you have every right to feel somewhat indignant, but you have a keen eye which can still make a difference, especially at FAC and similar. The primary editor there (Acroterion) is an excellent admin and has 1600 plus article starts but this is his first FA effort. My contributions are minimal.--MONGO 10:46, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

I've addressed and responded to your comments on the FAC page if you'd like to take another look - thanks for everything. Acroterion (talk) 22:40, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Supported. Great work. :) Durova⁴¹² 19:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

In keeping with current standards and acknowledging your contributions and your voluntary sacrifice...

For grace under withering fire in 2007 (and continuing until today...), you are hereby awarded this Purple Heart.

--DHeyward (talk) 06:27, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks both of you. And don't worry too much, it wasn't the trolls that caused the departure. Cheers! Durova⁴¹² 20:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

• One of these days, I hope, you will return. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 16:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

You're one of the good guys, Penwhale. Don't know how you do it; kudos to you. :) Durova⁴¹² 20:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIV, March 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 04:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXV, April 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:07, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXIX, August 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:52, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Million Award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Joan of Arc (estimated annual readership: 1,786,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Joan of Arc to Featured Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 18:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXXX, September 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Do you want to collaborate in the edition of Jessie J's page?

Hi, I'm JD3rulo. The thing is that I'm a huge fan of Jessie J, I have made changes in her page, but other users have removed them, replying that the links I referred to don't belong to reliable sources. So I'm wondering if you could dedicate part of your time in helping me to fill some topics that are abandoned, such as Jessie J's vocal type, range and also writing updated news about her career lately. I hope you can help me, cause it seems Jessie's page has been forgotten. If you need some help to write about any article or making research, you can count on me, so this is the only thing I can give you: my friendship to make wikipedia a better and updated site. Chao, have a nice day!JD3rulo (talk) 00:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Durova,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Democratic presidential ticket 1864b.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 8, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-11-08. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:54, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCI, October 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 22:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Happy Halloween!

TheGeneralUser has given you some caramel and a candy apple! Caramel and candy-coated apples are fun Halloween treats, and promote WikiLove on Halloween. Hopefully these have made your Halloween (and the proceeding days) much sweeter. Happy Halloween! If Trick-or-treaters come your way, add {{subst:Halloween apples}} to their talkpage with a spoooooky message!

Hi Durova! Wishing you a very happy Halloween :-) TheGeneralUser (talk) 22:09, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Hope...

...you're doing OK. Miss you. Herostratus (talk) 05:06, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCII, November 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:46, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wall of text

Hi Durova,

I know you are a Missing Wikipedian and I understand you do not want to be on the list. I just came here to thank you for starting Wikipedia:Wall of text. XOttawahitech (talk) 14:57, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 16:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIII, December 2013

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 00:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas! :-)

Happy Yuletides!
Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!)

~TheGeneralUser (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi Lise, Wishing you a very Happy and Wonderful Merry Christmas! Hope you are having a great time with family and friends :-) And I hope you'll be around more often. Best wishes. ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 00:13, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you :) ViCE 22:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIV, January 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:I am sorry you feel...

Wikipedia:I am sorry you feel..., a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:I am sorry you feel... and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:I am sorry you feel... during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Someone not using his real name (talk) 03:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCV, February 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:56, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVI, March 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVII, April 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Your experience could help the new French IPCOLL sister project

Hello Durova, it's been a long time since we were working together in various peace related projects, such as WP:IPCOLL. I hope you're doing well, and I think you may be as happy as I am about this new member of our family. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Israel_Palestine_Collaboration#French_sister_project. — Sebastian 22:40, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCVIII, May 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee motion

An arbitration amendment request in which you may be involved resulted in a motion by the Arbitration Committee

Motion

For the Arbitration Committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 13:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue XCIX, June 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:40, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue C, July 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Durova,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Great Wave off Kanagawa2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 1, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-09-01. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CI, August 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CII, September 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 02:24, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Monroe Street Bridge

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:MonroeStreetBridgea.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 02:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIII, October 2014, Redux

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

NOTE: This replaces the earlier October 2014 Bugle message, which had incorrect links -- please ignore/delete the previous message. Thank uou!

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:52, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Iowa and Nebraska lands10.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on November 9, 2014. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2014-11-09. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The Raven

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Dore raven shadow2.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 03:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIV, November 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CV, December 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:51, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Dear Durova,
MERRY CHRISTMAS!!! Best wishes to you, your family and relatives this holiday season! Take this opportunity to bond with your loved ones, whether or not you are celebrating Christmas. This is a special time for everybody, and spread the holiday spirit to everybody out there!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook).

Happy New Year!

Dear Durova,
HAPPY NEW YEAR!!! A new year has come! How times flies! 2015 will be a new year, and it is also a chance for you to start afresh! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 08:23, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This message promotes WikiLove. Created by Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook). To use this template, leave {{subst:User:Nahnah4/Happy New Year}} on someone else's talk page.

The Bugle: Issue CVI, January 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVII, February 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CVIII, March 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian Fleet Air Arm Museum Op-ed: TomStar81 on submarine warfare in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Baseball glass workers2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 22, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-04-22. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:The Dakota 1890b.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 29, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-04-29. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Conf dead chancellorsville edit1.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 3, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-05-03. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:45, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CIX, April 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the landing at Anzac Cove Op-ed: TomStar81 on the debut of poison gas in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 06:32, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Restoration candidate? Unique geological map

Yorkshire Museum's high-resolution, colour-accurate Map

Low-resolution, high-colour version - currently more useful on Wikipedia?

Two versions of Smith's 1815 Strata map

Hi Durova, Really impressed by your restoration work! Absolutely brilliant! I'm working with some museums in Yorkshire, UK and have recently uploaded a high resolution version of William Smith's pioneering geological map. This image is very true to the map as it is but you can see that the colours have faded and there has been some damage. Currently, the brighter, low-resolution version is in more useful as a thumbnail illustration in articles but it would be incredible to see the large version restored! You can see how bright the original was from a recently discovered, unfaded copy uploaded to Flickr here: Rediscovered Smith Map from the Geological Society. Unfortunately, the Geological Society aren't being very forward thinking about their Public Domain holdings! What are your thoughts? Thanks PatHadley (talk) 11:52, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Pictures File:French mutilé without mask2.jpg and File:French mutilé with mask2.jpg are due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 7, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-06-07. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CX, May 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 and Simon Harley on the sinking of the Lusitania Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 23:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXI, June 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Op-ed: TomStar81 on the new technology of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Lise,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Louis Armstrong2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 4, 2015. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2015-08-04. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:37, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXII, July 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Recent external reviews Review essay: Nick-D on sourcing articles about bombing a battleship Op-ed: TomStar81 on the role of nursing in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:35, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Assume clue

Wikipedia:Assume clue, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Assume clue and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Assume clue during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIII, August 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Second Schleswig War Interview: Featured picture participants Op-ed: TomStar81 on Indian nationalism during World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXIV, September 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors, coordinator elections have begun Articles: Abbasids to a Yugoslav monitor Book reviews: Economics of warfare, Japan, and light horse Op-ed: We can (not) advance Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:09, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXV, October 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Anotherclown and Sturmvogel 66 on war in the air and at sea Review essay: Auntieruth55 on the French Revolutionary Wars Op-ed: TomStar81 on the entry of Bulgaria in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVII, December 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the German retreat from France in 1944 Op-ed: TomStar81 on empires of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 05:06, 24 December 2015 (UTC)