User talk:HAL333/Archive 2019
This is an archive of past discussions about User:HAL333. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 2015 | ← | Archive 2017 | Archive 2018 | Archive 2019 |
Cambridge movement moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Cambridge movement, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 09:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll develop it more Britishfinance HAL333 16:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cambridge movement has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 16:04, 15 January 2019 (UTC)A page you started (Cambridge movement) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Cambridge movement.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Well done - good fix.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Britishfinance (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Britishfinance: Thanks. HAL333 21:40, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Treadwell Twichell) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Treadwell Twichell.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice article!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve (talk) 01:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, HAL333. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Labor of Love (2020 film).
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, ill retrieve it and do some more work on it HAL333 20:28, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Ways to improve Scott Sanders Productions
Hello, HAL333,
Thanks for creating Scott Sanders Productions! I edit here too, under the username JamesG5 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Stub with only source the subject's own website. Needs to be fleshed out & have viable references added.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JamesG5}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JamesG5 (talk) 07:15, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks JamesG5, I appreciate the advice and will try to follow it. HAL333 13:36, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
The article Scott Sanders Productions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Previously deleted article. Single sourced to subject's website. Needs to be filled out and referenced to be a viable article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesG5 (talk) 07:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montgomery High School (Montgomery, Texas), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montgomery County Sheriff's Office (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Robert F. Marx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canaries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Nagasaki, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. The article uses British English spellings (harbour, colour) throughout. There is no good reason to change it. General Ization Talk 02:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks HAL333 02:57, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
ITN recognition for 2019 Dresden heist
On 26 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Dresden heist, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Of course. Thanks HAL333 13:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Jeffrey Epstein
Re your recent edit, please see Talk:Jeffrey_Epstein#New_"In_popular_culture"_section. I expect you will wish to respond. 86.143.229.179 (talk) 05:08, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks. I appreciate it. HAL333 16:53, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I also came here to ask you to discuss that addition. I've removed it meantime from the article. Thanks for your understanding.— Preceding unsigned comment added by The Huhsz (talk • contribs) 17:55, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
- To be honest, you're completely right in your comment here. However, I am boycotting that RFC since it is so unbelievably biased against having the image. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 00:56, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks MJL ‐Talk‐. SchroCat did make the RFC completely biased, but I find that when I don't participate, they end up using the "consensus" to railroad the logical choice. HAL333 03:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- [Thank you for the ping] You're right in that regard. However, I think it might be more helpful in a lot of regards for me to step back and see what others say. I've never argued with a user who was so painfully wrong yet bent on insisting otherwise, and I have never seen an RFC formed that claims one side of the debate is fraudulent. If people seemed to get fooled by it, then maybe I'll weigh in. However, it would seem that most participants thus far are in favor of including the image. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 04:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- I can understand that MJL ‐Talk‐ HAL333 06:49, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- [Thank you for the ping] You're right in that regard. However, I think it might be more helpful in a lot of regards for me to step back and see what others say. I've never argued with a user who was so painfully wrong yet bent on insisting otherwise, and I have never seen an RFC formed that claims one side of the debate is fraudulent. If people seemed to get fooled by it, then maybe I'll weigh in. However, it would seem that most participants thus far are in favor of including the image. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 04:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
DYK for The Child (Star Wars character)
On 27 December 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Child (Star Wars character), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Baby Yoda", a character in the Star Wars spin-off The Mandalorian, was named "2019's biggest new character" by The Guardian? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Child (Star Wars character). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Child (Star Wars character)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
April 2020
Scott Fitzgerald as a baby award | |
Good work expanding the F. Scott Fitzgerald article! In recognition, you have been awarded this baby photo of Scott. Cheers! ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 19:08, 7 April 2020 (UTC) |
- Thanks. I hope to be able to get it to GA status. ~ HAL333 19:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Great choice for a GA, good luck! If there is anything I can help with, let me know. Best ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 19:20, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Avengers Endgame and Forbes contributors
Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Forbes contributors. That explains about Forbes contributor content being used as sources. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! That makes a little more sense. ~ HAL333 00:33, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Happy Easter or whatever you celebrate
or: the resurrection of loving-kindness --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! I wish you a great Easter as well. ~ HAL333 18:23, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, strange without lots of singing, but more time for hiking and biking. How do you like my singing in defiance, for example the loving-kindnesses piece? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, it was very good! I'm impressed. ~ HAL333 20:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- The idea was born when the composer was TFA, DYK? When Penderecki died I thought about which piece to focus on, as a contribution of thanks, took the Credo rather soon, and became more and more intrigued by both content and him conducting it up to rather recently. (His bio went only to 2014, but found that he conducted it in 2018, to celebrate a centenary of Polish independence, in Ukraine!) Seems really some personal Creed, with an Easter song in the end. I was just too late for a DYK for Easter, also had the other already, so it will appear some day with a different hook. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- ... and today Le Concert Spirituel - had to work on another composer who died when I found out that the last one had taken his pic and written his article --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:29, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- A lot of greats of died recently, Brian Dennehy, Allen Daviau, Freeman Dyson... ~ HAL333 22:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Agree. Today, I remember the birthday of a great conductor, and remember that I knew in 2014 that he died before news knew. - When you see news of a recent death (for example watching Deaths in 2020), feel fre to upgrade the article, at least get rid of tags, and if sufficiently sourced, nominate on WP:ITNN to be mentioned on the Main page. I keep being surprised about how many views that section gets, last week a five-digit number for a Swedish mezzo-soprano, just by mentioning her name, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I definitely will. ~ HAL333 15:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sometimes - when I can't upgrade a composer's article enough - I write about one of his works, especially fun when it's music for free imagination in battle with thought control ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, I do the same thing. When a featured article like Ernest Hemingway doesn't have much room for improvement, I edit the articles on all of his short-stories and novels. ~ HAL333 22:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thinking alike, it seems ;) - To be pictured tomorrow: Credo. For Easter it was the loving-kindness (with particular pleasure, I admit), and last year it was an opera, where it says in the end "We pounded at the doors of the mighty; unheard remained the heart-wrenched agony, our people's mournful fate!", so more particular pleasure. (Remember Mozart?) My related little credo is here, please mind it's last line ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I've decided to not initiate anymore discussions on infoboxes. If someone else creates a discussion and my opinion would actually contribute something, then I might pitch in. But I've found it best to go to articles without a cartel of editors who've worked on it for 5-10 years. ~ HAL333 15:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah! - I believe that there are still many Mozart compositions without. I took care of the piano concertos after this beauty (not by me) made it to FA. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- I hope you're getting by during this pandemic and consequent lockdown. ~ HAL333 00:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Trying, hope the same for you. Singing in choir is better than singing alone. Today, read Credo, "this is the day ..." - a line from Psalm 118 which Penderecki included in what he believed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Psalm 118 was just what I needed. Thanks! ~ HAL333 18:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- I should look into that one more. Did you know that we have a project going, to improve the psalms articles? I had no idea how many artworks the kiss of justice and peace inspired. - But first, I go for a great singer, Inge Borkh, planned to be GA some day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- There's a WikiProject for almost everything nowadays. I used to be involved in a few, but I preferred going off on whatever interested me. ~ HAL333 00:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- I should look into that one more. Did you know that we have a project going, to improve the psalms articles? I had no idea how many artworks the kiss of justice and peace inspired. - But first, I go for a great singer, Inge Borkh, planned to be GA some day. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Psalm 118 was just what I needed. Thanks! ~ HAL333 18:44, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Trying, hope the same for you. Singing in choir is better than singing alone. Today, read Credo, "this is the day ..." - a line from Psalm 118 which Penderecki included in what he believed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- I hope you're getting by during this pandemic and consequent lockdown. ~ HAL333 00:56, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah! - I believe that there are still many Mozart compositions without. I took care of the piano concertos after this beauty (not by me) made it to FA. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I've decided to not initiate anymore discussions on infoboxes. If someone else creates a discussion and my opinion would actually contribute something, then I might pitch in. But I've found it best to go to articles without a cartel of editors who've worked on it for 5-10 years. ~ HAL333 15:20, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thinking alike, it seems ;) - To be pictured tomorrow: Credo. For Easter it was the loving-kindness (with particular pleasure, I admit), and last year it was an opera, where it says in the end "We pounded at the doors of the mighty; unheard remained the heart-wrenched agony, our people's mournful fate!", so more particular pleasure. (Remember Mozart?) My related little credo is here, please mind it's last line ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, I do the same thing. When a featured article like Ernest Hemingway doesn't have much room for improvement, I edit the articles on all of his short-stories and novels. ~ HAL333 22:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sometimes - when I can't upgrade a composer's article enough - I write about one of his works, especially fun when it's music for free imagination in battle with thought control ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:41, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I definitely will. ~ HAL333 15:14, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- Agree. Today, I remember the birthday of a great conductor, and remember that I knew in 2014 that he died before news knew. - When you see news of a recent death (for example watching Deaths in 2020), feel fre to upgrade the article, at least get rid of tags, and if sufficiently sourced, nominate on WP:ITNN to be mentioned on the Main page. I keep being surprised about how many views that section gets, last week a five-digit number for a Swedish mezzo-soprano, just by mentioning her name, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
- A lot of greats of died recently, Brian Dennehy, Allen Daviau, Freeman Dyson... ~ HAL333 22:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, it was very good! I'm impressed. ~ HAL333 20:10, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you, strange without lots of singing, but more time for hiking and biking. How do you like my singing in defiance, for example the loving-kindnesses piece? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I find you an interesting editor, I think the Clorox bleach should have its own article, there are loads of sourcing about this bleach, could you make it?. 191.13.97.117 (talk) 11:41, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of F. Scott Fitzgerald
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article F. Scott Fitzgerald you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Starsandwhales: Thanks! ~ HAL333 17:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Please see the talk page. CassiantoTalk 17:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of F. Scott Fitzgerald
The article F. Scott Fitzgerald you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:F. Scott Fitzgerald for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Starsandwhales -- Starsandwhales (talk) 15:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
- Awesome! ~ HAL333 16:34, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. CassiantoTalk 16:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Hey
- He's your typical Wikipedia diva. Talks a lot, has thin skin. Just avoid him.--v/r - TP 23:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- TParis Yeah, I've unfortunately had my fair share of encounters - avoiding him really is the best approach. I hope you're doing well. ~ HAL333 00:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, some people on this project really fit that essay to a T. Having seen this, he reacted just like any child would and retaliated; as if I care lol!--v/r - TP 13:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, but no — no to these final jabs. El_C 15:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ok, ok. ~ HAL333 15:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, but no — no to these final jabs. El_C 15:25, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, some people on this project really fit that essay to a T. Having seen this, he reacted just like any child would and retaliated; as if I care lol!--v/r - TP 13:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
- TParis Yeah, I've unfortunately had my fair share of encounters - avoiding him really is the best approach. I hope you're doing well. ~ HAL333 00:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
Cape Canaveral Space Force Station
I wanted to notify you about a requested move on Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, since you were involved in the first one. Talk:Cape Canaveral Space Force Station#Requested move 30 April 2020 Garuda28 (talk) 03:52, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
- Garuda28 Thanks, I'll check it out. ~ HAL333 05:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Unsourced information
Re: List of awards and nominations received by Javier Bardem, please see WP:V. We cannot have unsourced information on Wikipedia, particularly about living persons. Let me know if you have any questions or need my help. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll get around to adding some sources. ~ HAL333 02:45, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Javier Bardem filmography at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 02:53, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Pageone.ng
At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pageone.ng, did you accidentally edit the wrong page? The "nominator" has subsequently been blocked as a sock, and his nomination was an argument to avoid, specifically WP:Not notable. Now, I realize this is an essay and not policy, but it is generally adhered to. If you meant to !vote this way, then pardon my intrusion. All the best, and happy editing. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:32, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
- No, I meant to edit that page. Appreciated the check though. Thanks! ~ HAL333 20:20, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Shooting of Ahmaud Arbery
Just a friendly reminder that WP:BLP applies to Talk:Shooting of Ahmaud Arbery, and also Travis McMichael and his father Gregory McMichael. Would you mind striking out and/or removing the end of your !vote in the RfC (the unsourced allegation about "Murderer"), they've been arrested and charged, but not convicted per WP:BLPCRIME. It could be viewed as a potential BLP:VIO against the McMichaels. Thanks. Isaidnoway (talk) 16:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
- Isaidnoway All right. ~ HAL333 19:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Peter Weir filmography
The proper thing to do is keep the filmography header, and then include a link to the proper page. It’s not difficult. Rcarter555 (talk) 06:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Rcarter55 Feel free to do that. ~ HAL333 13:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
- Feel free to not be a dick. It costs nothing. Rcarter555 (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Limp Bizkit on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
June 2020
Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Death of George Floyd. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Specifically per MOS:REDIRECT, redirect terms are generally bolded. —Bagumba (talk) 08:18, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Javier Bardem filmography
On 1 June 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Javier Bardem filmography, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Javier Bardem (pictured) is the first Spanish actor to win an Academy Award, which he won for his performance in No Country for Old Men? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Javier Bardem filmography. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Javier Bardem filmography), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
- Cwmhiraeth Thanks! ~ HAL333 14:24, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Million Award for F. Scott Fitzgerald
The Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring F. Scott Fitzgerald (estimated annual readership: 1,160,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:04, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |
- Reidgreg Thanks! I really appreciate that. ~ HAL333 15:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Piers Robinson on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Done ~ HAL333 15:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Category:Female actor filmographies has been nominated for merging
"Dinosauce313" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dinosauce313. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 22#Dinosauce313 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race on a request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. |
Done ~ HAL333 15:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
FLC
Thanks for the responses on the Sigourney Weaver FLC, the list is looking very good now. If you're interested, I have co-nominated a TV-related FLC with a newer editor, Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Community/archive1, and we're looking for another comment or two to push it over the edge. No pressure if not. Thanks! — Bilorv (Black Lives Matter) 08:08, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Bilorv Sure! ~ HAL333 13:11, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, much appreciated. :) — Bilorv (Black Lives Matter) 17:56, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Elon Musk
Kindly do not remove details from the IB unless it has been discussed on the Talk page. =--Jaysmith5 (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- Jaysmith5 Kindly do not add details to the IB unless it had been discussed on the Talk page. Accept the status quo. ~ HAL333 01:12, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
These details on the IB have been accepted and been in place for a moderate amount of time. Happy to have a respectful discussion with you on the Talk page of the article. Thank you, -- Jaysmith5 (talk) 01:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of F. Scott Fitzgerald
Hello! Your submission of F. Scott Fitzgerald at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 18:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Can such a popular page, even if semi-protected, ever really be called stable? Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 03:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for alerting me. ~ HAL333 04:54, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
FLC review request
Thanks for promptly responding to my feedback in your two FLCs. When you have the time, could I please trouble you to have a look at my FLC nom? Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 00:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sure! ~ HAL333 01:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
~ HAL333 00:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
DYK for F. Scott Fitzgerald
On 11 July 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article F. Scott Fitzgerald, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that F. Scott Fitzgerald's works, such as The Great Gatsby, only gained popularity after his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/F. Scott Fitzgerald. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, F. Scott Fitzgerald), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
- Awesome, thanks! ~ HAL333 00:46, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Media, the arts, and architecture request for comment
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
"1619 riots" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1619 riots. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 12#1619 riots until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
92nd Academy Awards FLC
Hi there,
I was wondering if you have time to review 92nd Academy Awards for featured list consideration. I would appreciate the feedback.
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:41, 16 July 2020 (UTC)- Thanks for notifying me. ~ HAL333 15:55, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
FLC review request
Hi. I noticed that you're highly active at FLC. I have a candidate list that is rapidly approaching the older nominations section and has only one review, and I'm worried that my nomination will fail purely from lack of attention. Would you be willing to take a look at it and offer any feedback you have?
I intend to use the finished FL as a template for improving similar lists, so the more feedback I'm able to get, the better.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy Sure, I'll try to get to it soon. ~ HAL333 16:50, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Hi HAL333! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Precious
biographies and film
Thank you for quality articles such as F. Scott Fitzgerald, Death of Jeffrey Epstein and The Mandalorian (Star Wars character), for substantial filmographies such as Jack Nicholson's, for living old-fashioned values, - lover of films by SK and "Dedicated Wikipedia editor", you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2416 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt Thanks! It's an honor. ~ HAL333 16:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- I hope you realise that it's from the cabal of the outcast ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:56, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
pale globe-thistle above the Rhine |
- Never a signed-up member but outcast, and more, a friend, and having given the best advice for survival here. Enjoy life, Hal! The first name I came across when typing your name now was Hasteur, and the second Halibutt. - In a nutshell: certain articles, you better leave alone, period. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- I get it - life is to short to waste it on IB discussions. ~ HAL333 13:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hasteur: I was sure I gave him precious long ago, - but wrong. Haven't decided if I do it now. I think I told you where I'm spending my time. Anna was a friend of mine. - Doing the Sinatra-all-day-DYK event in 2015 was great fun, and collaboration. (I hope you looked at every link above.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- I was personally quite upset when I heard of Morricone's passing. I watched Cinema Paradiso that night. I'm actually planning to get an article related to him up to FL soon. I can understand your point about constructive edits - a controversial rfc can take as much work and time as a FL and something rarely comes from it. ~ HAL333 13:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- The cabal's to-do is here, and you can list a FLN at the top when it's ready, signed-up or not ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:01, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- I was personally quite upset when I heard of Morricone's passing. I watched Cinema Paradiso that night. I'm actually planning to get an article related to him up to FL soon. I can understand your point about constructive edits - a controversial rfc can take as much work and time as a FL and something rarely comes from it. ~ HAL333 13:34, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Hasteur: I was sure I gave him precious long ago, - but wrong. Haven't decided if I do it now. I think I told you where I'm spending my time. Anna was a friend of mine. - Doing the Sinatra-all-day-DYK event in 2015 was great fun, and collaboration. (I hope you looked at every link above.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- I get it - life is to short to waste it on IB discussions. ~ HAL333 13:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
- Never a signed-up member but outcast, and more, a friend, and having given the best advice for survival here. Enjoy life, Hal! The first name I came across when typing your name now was Hasteur, and the second Halibutt. - In a nutshell: certain articles, you better leave alone, period. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Oh look, a Tainted Award being given to someone because they were disruptive in an idiot box comment. If there is a disruptive and nasty step to take around those discussions, you always seem to manage it. - SchroCat (talk) 22:54, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- What is your deal? What is up with the bad faith and innuendo? Those are rhetorical questions, please do not respond. Please desist immediately. El_C 13:21, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
FYI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. CassiantoTalk 22:34, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Sinatra
I have no idea why you seem determined to be so disruptive on the Sinatra article, but just stop. There is no need for personal attacks (and, yes, reference to a “cabal” is a personal attack), and the question of the lead image was discussed six months ago. Just. Let. It. Go. - SchroCat (talk) 22:42, 23 July 2020 (UTC)