Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 652: Line 652:


*<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px|link=|]] '''Done''' – as a [[WP:Drafts|draft]] or [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]], the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.<!-- End Template:UND - g13 --> '''''[[User:Hut 8.5|<span style="color:#b50000;">Hut 8.5</span>]]''''' 18:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
*<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px|link=|]] '''Done''' – as a [[WP:Drafts|draft]] or [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]], the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.<!-- End Template:UND - g13 --> '''''[[User:Hut 8.5|<span style="color:#b50000;">Hut 8.5</span>]]''''' 18:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

== Oyinkansola Alabi ==

*{{revisions|Oyinkansola Alabi}}

Hi, I'm Kizule, and I would like to request the undeletion of this [[WP:Drafts|draft]] deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. [[User:Kizule|Kizule]] ([[User talk:Kizule|talk]]) 20:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:44, 6 June 2022

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests to unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests to unprotect, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.
    This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here).

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:

    Enter the page's title:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion


    Claude Marcel

    The Proposed Deletion didn't identify anything specifically wrong with the content of the article. It might be taken as suggesting that the article was a vanity page, but Marcel seems to be a genuinely notable figure: for example he features in the two relatively recent journal articles listed below.

    Tickoo, Makhan L. (June 1982). "JAMES HAMILTON AND C.V.A. MARCEL: A REVIEW OF LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THE 1820's". World Englishes. 1 (4): 174–178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-971X.1982.tb00495.x. Retrieved 24 May 2022.

    Smith, Richard (18 July 2013). "Claude Marcel (1793–1876): A Neglected Applied Linguist?". Language & History. 52 (2): 171–181. doi:10.1179/175975309X452058. Retrieved 24 May 2022..

    Thank you for looking into this. RW Dutton (talk) 01:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • The article was deleted 10 years back and did not cite any references, and may have to undergo a major rewrite. Do you want it restored in draftspace instead? Jay (talk) 05:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • @RW Dutton: still waiting for you to tell us if you want this to become a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Sorry for the delay. I'd rather the full article were restored, if possible. I'll quickly cut it down to a stub with citations, but if the old article text is in the article history it's less likely to get lost and forgotten, and bits of it can probably be returned to the article over time when references are found.
      Also, I've just found Professor Richard Smith's PhD dissertation https://era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6750 , and it provides a reliable source for quite a few of the original article's claims about Marcel, for example his Legion of Honour. RW Dutton (talk) 12:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      checkY Restored. @RW Dutton: as I'm not sure if you know how WP:Drafts work, restoring to draft also would have brought back the old article text into the article history, so there is no difference really, except that in mainspace now, you'll have to work quickly to avoid the article getting deleted. Jay (talk) 12:24, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Fore School Of Management

    This is regarding the deletion of the page of ‘FORE School of Management’ from the platform. We request you to kindly reconsider your decision for this page. It is an authentic source of information for students. They rely on this page for information related to this management institute.

    We appeal to you to kindly help us understand the problematic sections of the page that raise a question mark on its credibility. If needed, we can also provide trustworthy citations to support the existence, authenticity, and factual accuracy of the information furnished on this page with respect to this management college.

    Looking forward to your response." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Architgupta2323 (talk • contribs) 05:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. As per the WP:Articles for deletion/Fore School of Management (2nd nomination), the article was deleted as it failed to satisfy notabiliy of organizations or companies. See WP:NCORP for the criteria. It you feel the subject is notable and should not have been deleted, you may contact the deleting admin or go to WP:Deletion review with your reasoning. Also, note that repeated use of "we" may imply that multiple people are sharing your user account. User accounts are for individual use and cannot be shared (WP:Username policy#Usernames implying shared use). Jay (talk) 07:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Jay,
    I'm not able to reach out admin. Could you please help me with how to contact with deleting admin @Star Mississippi? Architgupta2323 (talk) 10:04, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Post a message at her talk page - User talk:Star Mississippi. Jay (talk) 10:40, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks @Jay. @Architgupta2323 this has been deleted twice now. I will not be restoring it as the arguments you provided indicate you're not familiar with the role of Wikipedia articles, and you have not indicated that the conclusion was incorrect. You're welcome to file a Deletion Review if you believe my closure was in error. Star Mississippi 13:23, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of Fore School of Management, deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the Fore School of Management page so that I can make edits to it, and will make sure that supporting with accurate information and rigid sources. I request you to kindly provide me with a protected page so that no one can make changes and add untrue information. Earlier, my competitors also made many changes and provided incorrect information. Architgupta2323 (talk) 06:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    The draft was only a redirect to the deleted article, so no reason to restore it. And Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, so we try to avoid preemptive protection. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    You have been told above that the route to have this restored is WP:DRV. Please do so if you feel the close was in error, but it will not work if you simply want it to promote the school to students. Please also declare your Conflict of Interest as required. Star Mississippi 13:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I have duly noted your feedback and suggestions to bolster notability of the deleted page in question. In this context, please allow me to share links for “FORE School of Management” that manifests the credibility of the page. In addition, I will provide further links to support the integrity of the deleted page for your ease of reference. I would be grateful for an opportunity to mitigate the gaps as per Wikipedia guideline and therefore request you to kindly restore the deleted page so that the appropriate changes can be implemented. @Star Mississippi Architgupta2323 (talk) 05:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @Architgupta2323 as I said, I will not be restoring the page. You're welcome to work on it in draft space if you agree to submit it for neutral review via AFC. Let me know if you agree and I will restore the draft Star Mississippi 13:36, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, if you restore the draft and I put the correct information as per Wikipedia along with rigid citations, will you consider it, and is there any chance to restore the page? Could you please help me with how can I restore this page with WP:DRV? @Star Mississippi 43.247.41.226 (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Architgupta2323, you may have edited without logging in to Wikipedia, it does not show your name but an IP address in the signature. Did you go through the helpful links from the Welcome message on your talk page? See Help:Your first article#Create your draft on how drafts can become articles or the WP:AFC process. You have been informed 3 times by now to go to WP:DRV ONLY IF YOU FEEL the article's deletion by the admin was an error. Given your limited understanding of Wikipedia, I doubt if you can argue that on Deletion review. I would suggest you start working on the draft once it is restored in draftspace. Jay (talk) 17:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Against my better judgement, it is here Draft:Fore School of Management. The main article is protected against creation until a neutral reviewer and/or DRV accepts it. Star Mississippi 01:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Vivaldi (TV series)

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivaldi (TV series). I don't know why the article was originally deleted. I can work at providing better sources given time. I would ask it to be undeleted for me to do so. I'm a part-time user and did not notice this nomination. —Shparhtahn (talk) 18:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • As you need time to improve the article, would you rather want to do it in draftspace so that it is not nominated for deletion again with the same reasons as before? Jay (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for getting back to me. I appreciate it. I suppose I could do that, not sure how to do that but I can figure it out. Thanks again for your time. Shparhtahn (talk) 16:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Draftified – the page has been restored to the draft space at Draft:Vivaldi (TV series). Jay (talk) 16:52, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Chosen Effect

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chosen Effect.LiterateFactChecker (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC) This article should have never been put up for deletion as this is an accomplished entertainer. For almost a decade this article has been on Wikipedia. I have been actively working to improve upon it which the article's history will show and will continue to remain dedicated to doing so. This article documents this person's life's work and deserves to live on Wikipedia as much as anyone else. Instead of deleting I would ask others to assist me in making this article better so this person's accomplishments and story can live on for others to discover, isn't that the point of Wikipedia.[reply]

    WP:INVOLVED admin here: I have no regrets about nominating this for deletion and I'm disappointed that Star Mississippi soft deleted this rather than "hard deleting" or relisting. Quality of the deleted article is so poor that I recommend restoring this to draft space, not article space. If it's back in article space, I'll nominate it for deletion again. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:24, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I strongly disagree with you and could easily point out multiple articles from similar entertainers written in the same vain. Also if the issues are being addressed which I have been proactively doing why are you already stating you will nominate it for deletion? I have no idea why you are so determined to delete someone else's legacy so badly. LiterateFactChecker (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Because the subject isn't notable. Please point out those other articles written in the same vain. If they're not notable, I'll nominate them too. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Not notable to you but notable to me which is why I am putting the research and time in to assure it it improved upon so the 2 issues that were left to sort out are. LiterateFactChecker (talk) 18:11, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    if you want others to help you improve it, I'm happy to draftify it @LiterateFactChecker as I said in my close, but I agree with @Muboshgu that if it goes to mainspace it will likely be immediately re-nominated. @Muboshgu I knew a soft consensus wouldn't stand, and AfD is utterly flooded right now with the remains of the TV AfDs. I didn't think relisting would be helpful. Happy to revert my close and leave it for someone else, but I think keeping it out of mainspace until there are BLP compliant sourcing indicating notability would be the best path. Let me know how you'd like to proceed. Star Mississippi 00:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Star Mississippi, that makes sense as for why you didn't relist it. I don't patrol AfD. I'd say the best way to proceed is draftify, as you suggested in your close. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @MuboshguI'd say save your sanity and don't <g> but it's good most of the year. Like many consensus driven areas (I think I've seen you at ITN? so I know you know this overall issue) we just don't have the participation on a general day, and when it's heavy volume none of us have the spoons to weigh in on all the conversations we'd like to. @LiterateFactChecker let me know if you'd like it as a draft and I'll do so. Star Mississippi 00:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm an avowed deletionist, so I think I'd be biased towards that whenever the consensus isn't obvious. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Star Mississippi sorry for the late reply only just seen this. Question is Draftify the same as Userfying? LiterateFactChecker (talk) 18:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @LiterateFactChecker it's moot as @Graeme Bartlett restored it to maispace, but draft would be in Draft:Chosen Effect whereas userfied would be something like User:LiterateFactChecker/Chosen Effect. Generally folks don't edit articles in others' userspace whereas collaboration is welcome in draft space. Star Mississippi 18:38, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Star Mississippi Thank you for clarification. I seem to be fighting a loosing battle to rescue this persons article from deletion despite suggesting alternate solutions to deletion such as improving upon the article or merging which is suggested to do so by Wikipedia. LiterateFactChecker (talk) 19:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    this is a challenge faced when consensus is fairly clear that the artist isn't notable. But you're welcome to keep adding sourcing Star Mississippi 19:24, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Materialise logo withBaseline Color.png

    Image is in the public domain per {{PD-textlogo}}, requesting undeletion of hidden file rev deleted per WP:F5. —HouseBlastertalk 16:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Vanishing Angle

    Hi, I'm Lauracoover, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Lauracoover (talk) 03:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 06:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Mary Morrissey (writer)

    Hi, I'm Draft9784, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Draft9784 (talk) 04:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ponni Concessao (Architect)

    Hi, I'm Gopinagarajan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Gopinagarajan (talk) 07:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. Jay (talk) 07:35, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:RoseHosting

    Hi, I'm Ntrsboy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Ntrsboy (talk) 08:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. Jay (talk) 11:09, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Numberphile Logo.png

    Image is in the public domain per {{PD-textlogo}}, requesting undeletion of hidden file rev deleted per WP:F5. —HouseBlastertalk 12:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Nordsee Logo.svg

    Image is in the public domain per {{PD-textlogo}}, requesting undeletion of hidden file rev deleted per WP:F5. —HouseBlastertalk 12:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rahul Datta

    Hi, I'm Lordofcorona, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Lordofcorona (talk) 12:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:RHO SIGMA

    Hi, I'm Ramsa23, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Ramsa23 (talk)

    I still trying to figure out how can i successfully submit an article. ~ Ramsa23 (talk) 13:41, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Shivanga Kumar Gogoi

    Hi, I'm Jaan205, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Jaan205 (talk) 14:52, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pye Family

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft Draft:Pye Family deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 2A00:23C7:FC29:A401:7506:8990:9BA:A915 (talk) 15:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Fore School Of Management

    I have duly noted your feedback and suggestions to bolster notability of the deleted page in question. In this context, please allow me to share links for “FORE School of Management” that manifests the credibility of the page. In addition, I will provide further links to support the integrity of the deleted page for your ease of reference. I would be grateful for an opportunity to mitigate the gaps as per Wikipedia guideline and therefore request you to kindly restore the deleted page so that the appropriate changes can be implemented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Architgupta2323 (talk • contribs) 16:54, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. Duplicate request, see WP:Requests for undeletion#Fore School Of Management above. Jay (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Ayush Saxena

    Hi, I'm Virk2024, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Virk2024 (talk) 18:38, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ramsey-Turán theory

    Hi, I'm Felix QW, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. I haven't seen the draft, but it was included in a list of promising discrete mathematics drafts on a WP:WPM list. The remaining discrete mathematics topics on that list have been brought to mainspace via AfC so I believe there might be valuable material here.Felix QW (talk) 19:53, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Jay (talk) 01:44, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Paul Castro Jr.

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 2600:1700:5D99:F460:8532:89BB:7D4C:6EEA (talk) 20:40, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. I don't think I've ever restored a page that was deleted so long ago, in this case 7 years. I hope you have found some good sources over these years! Liz Read! Talk! 06:15, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ali Nawaz Channa

    Hi, I'm Channa Ali Nawaz, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Channa Ali Nawaz (talk) 20:48, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:David E. Olson

    Hi, I'm HHA LTP, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. HHA LTP (talk) 21:27, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 01:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    TeenNick Top 10

    Was a constant contributor to this article, but a PROD request was placed and no notice was given to me the article was threatened with deletion. I'd like to either save the article, or strip it down to a redirect and retain its categories at the very least. —Nate • (chatter) 23:12, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Courtesy ping TenPoundHammer on the notification complaint. Jay (talk) 02:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:GlobalFoundries logo no shadow.svg

    Current version of this image is in the public domain per {{PD-textlogo}}, but was uploaded with the comment "New logo". Requesting that if the prior revision is in the public domain that it be undeleted. —HouseBlastertalk 13:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Ron Britton

    Hi, I'm Fatbookreader, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Fatbookreader (talk) 13:54, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 14:28, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Liberation Pointe

    Hi, I'm Afreiberg, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Afreiberg (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 17:25, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Juan Pablo Peña-Rosas

    Hi, I'm NoonIcarus, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. NoonIcarus (talk) 20:20, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    @Graeme Bartlett: Many thanks!! --NoonIcarus (talk) 02:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bill Russell (illustrator)

    Hi, I'm Billxoxo, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Billxoxo (talk) 21:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 06:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Northwest Corridor bus rapid transit line

    Hi, I'm Ɱ, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ɱ (talk) 21:26, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Scott Pulsipher

    Hi, I'm Mattie.jennings1, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Mattie.jennings1 (talk) 21:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 06:17, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Mayoralty of John Lindsay

    Hi, I'm Jon698, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Jon698 (talk) 22:17, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. Jay (talk) 06:15, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Jay: This draft was large and at the time I was busy with college work. I am going to do some edits to it and then put it into the mainspace. I can't remember the size of the article, but it was somewhere close to 100,000 bytes and I would be extremely sad to have lost all of that work. Jon698 (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Restored, please submit for review. Jay (talk) 21:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:QuantumBlack

    Hi, I'm Weissercn, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Weissercn (talk) 00:00, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 06:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:David Plaut

    Hi, I'm Brettws, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Brettws (talk) 01:06, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Jay (talk) 05:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Laureates Academy for Gifted Students

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 2607:FEA8:3D62:BA00:6D0E:5D61:2BBB:38B1 (talk) 01:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Agasthiappa Mudaliar

    Hi, I'm Bhuvana26, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Bhuvana26 (talk) 03:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. Jay (talk) 05:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rick_Steele

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Cyyoung1903 (talk) 04:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done Rick Steele was deleted as non-notable following a discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Rick Steele, and cannot be undeleted here. Jay (talk) 04:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Otnicka

    Hi, I'm JimmyTudessky, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. JimmyTudessky (talk) 06:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Apart (Léon album)

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can continue editing and improving it. Thank you. Leoseliv (talk) 07:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:GRACE Risk Score

    Hi, I'm Facts707, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you! Facts707 (talk) 08:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit the draft for review!. Jay (talk) 09:39, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Leah Boyd

    I'm requesting that Leah Boyd be undeleted and moved to my userpage space - not recreated at this juncture. There is now a second instance of significant coverage of Boyd in the Waco Tribune. Perhaps that's enough now for notability, but because of the previous deletion I think user space is sufficient until when there is a third instance of significant coverage (which seems inevitable at this point).--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 09:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC) —3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 09:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    @3family6: I see that you had earlier requested the deleter, who does not seem to be active since January. I can undelete this, do you want it moved to Draft:Leah Boyd instead? Also, if you have an external connection with the subject, you may make the required disclosures. Jay (talk) 11:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you! --3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 11:07, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    International Dialogue for Environmental Action

    Hello, I would like to request the undeletion of the page: International Dialogue for Environmental Action. This article was Soft deleted because it's notability was questioned. According to Wikipedia's general notability guideline: "A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".[[2]] This topic meets this requirement so there is no basis to delete this page. See links for examples.https://www.unccd.int/cso/idea-international-dialogue-environmental-action-public-association-0 https://uia.org/s/or/en/1122277905 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mriogrech (talk • contribs) 11:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:You'd Be Surprised (film).jpg

    Image is now in the public domain and previous revision was deleted due to size restrictions of non-free images —Salavat (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    @Salavat:  Done, revision undeleted. ✗plicit 14:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Yoast SEO logo.png

    Image is now in the public domain and previous revision was deleted due to size restrictions of non-free images —Salavat (talk) 14:29, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    @Salavat:  Done, revision undeleted. ✗plicit 14:34, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Otis Shepard

    Hi, I'm ChesWajda, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. It is saddening that creating an entry for two historical designers who lack a lot of "press" at the time cannot gain entry, and continue to be denied their due. Designers do their work in obscurity, and that's part of what I was trying to rectify here. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ChesWajda (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • Who are the two designers? Jay (talk) 21:04, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. I suspect the other designer is Dorothy, the subject's wife. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:HP Spectre

    Hi, I'm ThisIsNotABetter, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 14:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jacqueline DeShazor

    Hi, I'm FloridaArmy, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:31, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Maronite-Druze dualism

    Sure the creator is blocked for violating Wikipedia policy but are there any issues with the article itself? —Prodrummer619 (talk) 07:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Naesketchie

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naesketchie. There was no consensus for deletion and the subject is a notable music executive and has worked with several notable rappers in New York —Nobelsea (talk) 12:33, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    checkY Restored as a soft deletion. Jay (talk) 07:12, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:UST Baccalaureate Mass

    Hi, I'm Pampi1010, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Pampi1010 (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – although this was undeleted before at your request with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. The draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Jay (talk) 06:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Ivan Dimov (weightlifter)

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Dimov (weightlifter). He has now won a senior level gold medal at the 2022 European Weightlifting Championships so he should be notable for an article now. —Simeon (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    checkY Restored as a soft deletion. Jay (talk) 06:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:2020-21 North Dakota State Bison women's basketball team

    Hi, I'm Natethegreat4226, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Natethegreat4226 (talk) 23:26, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Jay (talk) 06:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Next issue/Op-Ed

    Please refund to my userspace. —🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 23:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Tamzin, you deleted this as a G7, although I do not see a G7 request. The deletion log also says cleared with EIC. What is EIC? Jay (talk) 06:22, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jay: There was no G7 request because I'm the sole substantial author. Nonetheless, since it was in Signpost-space, to avoid stepping on any toes I asked EpicPupper, the editor-in-chief (EIC), if there was any issue with me G7ing it, and he gave his blessing. EpicPupper, can I ask why you want a lightly-modified version of an essay still available in my userspace, the only modifications to which were in order for it to run in a publication that I no longer wish for it to run in? I don't object to that per se (after all, the content is all still there in the master copy); I'm just confused. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 06:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Withdrawing. Not done 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Schunnemunk Rail Trail

    Hi, I'm CaloreMedia, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. CaloreMedia (talk) 01:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Jay (talk) 05:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Srikumar Misra

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Srikumar Misra. I found Srikumar Misra notable for many areas such as founder of a notable company and received many notable awards. And this is a soft deletion, minimal participation. 132.154.1.243 (talk) 02:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Purshottam Lal

    Subject: Request for review of the deletion decision dated 26 April 2022 of Mr Sandstein- Case of Purshottam Lal

    Dear Reviewing Authority,

    (1) The Article on me - Purshottam Lal- created by Ms Sneha and approved by Wikipedia for publication on 27 January 2022 was deleted under the orders of Mr Sandstein ( herein after referred to as the  deleting administrator , or DA in short)  dated 26 April 2022 following a deletion discussion lasting 2 weeks. The final order said that  there was lack of notability and not enough secondary sources.

    (2) Normally, the creator of the page-Ms Sneha-should have made the review petition. However, since she is blocked for reasons presumably nothing to do with the  Article on me, she cannot communicate , and hence this review request by me.

    (3) As per advice on Wikipedia site , I first took up the matter with the DA  and sent him a note on 20th May  2022 on his Talk Page. He very kindly responded and wrote  : "Mr. Lal, consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purshottam Lal was that there is not enough significant coverage about you in reliable secondary sources that are independent of you. That is needed for an article about you. Could you please read our guideline page WP:BIO and then tell me what the three best pieces of such coverage about you are? Sandstein 17:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)"

    (4) Thus, in his response, he did not mention the " notability " aspect which was the main reason for deletion.

    (5) Since three independent References had been asked for and since most of my work as a writer and as a police officer had taken place in pre-internet era, I searched for feedback and comments of READERS of my articles in the print media since 1992 ( the year I started my writing endeavour ;  more than 115 articles have  since appeared in important newspapers, and four books published , all released by two different Governors of Punjab state ), and also newspaper reports of my work as a senior police officer , and after scanning them ,  sent the same  to the DA  on 25 May 2022 in PDF format,  uploaded on Wikimedia. It , inter-alia, contained 31 feedbacks in respect of 20 articles of mine. I requested the DA  to allow me to include  these or some of them as References in the Article if more independent References were required. Similar request was made in respect of References for police work. I had the impression that the Wikipedia's first efforts are to retain the Article by making improvement etc if possible. However, the DA finally replied on 26 May  2022 vide  which he did not touch upon this aspect at all, and commented that the three most important References mentioned by me in the deleted Article were not sufficient to justify an Article on me.

    (6) I understand AfD (Article for Deletion )is concerned with the substance of the Article whereas DR ( Deletion Review )  is concerned with  the process by which the decision was reached.

    (7) The following breaches  of due process  took place in my case which deserve consideration .


    (A) During the deletion discussion , the creator of the Article , Ms Sneha, was not allowed to participate on the ground that she had been  blocked. In fact, two posts made by her from her mobile data ( which was not blocked at that time, since only her IP address was blocked ) giving clarifications on points raised by certain esteemed members of the Wikipedia community were struck off. Thus, the creator of the Article, went totally unrepresented and unheard. This is a breach of the principles of natural justice and fair play. At least, for this case, her block should have been removed so that her view point could also have been available for consideration.

    (B) Mr  Bonadea started the deletion discussion on 11 April 2022. He later blocked IPA address of Ms Sneha, creator of the Article, for the so-called sock-puppeting . When she put her viewpoints - twice- during the discussion through her mobile data, Mr Bonadea blocked her  mobile data connectivity, too. He also struck off posts so put by Ms Sneha. Thus, in this case an inevitable clash of interest took place  leading to denial of the opportunity of being heard , by virtue of both actions - deletion discussion and blocking- having been initiated /ordered  by the same party i.e. Mr Bonadea. This is against the principles of natural justice in any society/country governed by the rule of law. The blocking decision should not have been taken by Mr Bonadea as he knew that he had already  initiated the deletion discussion. He ought to have referred the blocking decision to some other Administrator. Thus, due process of fairness and unprejudiced discussion have  been violated in this case.

    (C ) At least two members who participated in  the discussion majorly misread the Article. They presumed that I had been the Head of the Punjab Police Force. No such claim was made in the Article. It rather said in the Introduction : " ....retired from the rank of Director General of Police". Thus, it was the rank which was mentioned, and not the actual post. There are a few posts in the Punjab Police  , all manned by DG rank officers. Though the two gentlemen spoke in my favour, yet their impression was wrong , and I pointed it out at the very first instance to Mr Geoffrey Lane of the Wikipedia in an email dated 28 April 2022.  Such a misreading by not only these two esteemed members of the WP community but by some other participants also- like the one inquiring about the President's Police Medal for Distinguished Service in respect of which clarification was provided by the creator of the Article ,the same , however,having been  being struck off-  shows lack of proper understanding and appreciation of the contents of the Article  by some of the esteemed  participants. The number of participants , most of them not well-informed about the Indian system of policing except two, was also too less, about 5 or 6. This  type of discussion amounted to a process not germane to a meaningful discussion , laying too much stress on the so-called independent References which , though present among the list of References, were not found adequate by the participants and ultimately by  the DA. Instead of looking at the totality of the material available , they rather looked only at a part of it resulting in miscarriage of justice.

    (D  ) The DA's  final note dated 26 May  2022 on his Talk Page says that the first two  References mentioned speak  of  my book , and not of  me. This is, to say the least, not a very correct interpretation. When somebody is talking about my book ,  he is naturally talking about me also as the book is my creation. About the third Reference, he mentioned it was by an organisation to which I belong and hence was not independent. First of all, he could not appreciate that the Reference was picked up by the creator by the  internet search and mentioned as such  just to show my qualities as a senior police officer ,  and referred to my past association with the organisation ,  and not the present one as I am no longer a member of it. Secondly, I was associated with it but had no control over it. The Reference also mentions the names of the former Governor Punjab and former Chief Secretary Punjab just to show that I was, at one time in the past,   in the category  of highly notable persons in the administration of the  Punjab government , thereby supplementing my notability.

    (E  ) The DA's  final note dated 26 May 2022 is silent on the suggestion to allow, for improving the Article,  the use of  31 feedbacks provided in respect of 20 articles of mine in PDF format uploaded on Wikimedia ,   as  independent secondary sources for my writing work, which PDF file  contained some References for my police work also ( all relating to pre-internet era). Perhaps these or some of them could have been considered for addition so that the Article could have been  improved and saved , as I understand that the first endeavour of the Wikipedia , as a positive step, is to retain the Article by improving it. Pre-internet References would naturally be in paper format, and only their scanned copies can be attached. Some 59  more  References ( out of which some might be common to the list already in the deleted Article)  also sent for my articles and TV discusdions for possible use in improving the Article were also not touched upon by the DA in his final note of 26 May 2022.

    (F )  The Article was approved on 27 January 2022 by Wikipedia ( Mr John B 123- more than 1,89,000 edits and more than 248 active Articles to his credit) after satisfying about notability and References. No new facts came to light  after that. No falsity of any information was ever alleged. Hence, in the absence of any fresh material, it is not fair to declare the same Article as ineligble on grounds of lack of notability and inadequacy of References, though later the DA  in his note of 20 May 2022 on his Talk Page did not raise the issue of notability , and only of secondary independent References. Thus , there has been an apparent lack of consistency . I think an Article duly approved by an esteemed and experienced Wikipedian-Administrator  should not be put up for deletion discussion unless fresh damaging material became available.

    (G )  I have suffered loss of face by the deletion effected 3 months after its publication after due approval . I am now more than 75 years of age. My endeavour to write the fifth  book- Origin of the Aryans-  which was half-way through, is stalled due to this upsetting development.

    Keeping in view the totality of circumstances, it is requested that the Article may kindly be restored. It can, however, be improved by adding more References or even amending it. 

    Thanking you,

    Yours sincerely, Purshottam Lal —103.87.26.156 (talk) 08:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Legally Blonde 3

    Hi, I'm Vistadan, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. vistadan 11:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Less Unless (talk) 14:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Aryam Hozhabr

    Hi, I'm Saiedeh.r, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Saiedeh.r (talk) 12:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Less Unless (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:WABM logo.svg

    Image is now in the public domain and previous revision was deleted due to size restrictions of non-free images —Salavat (talk) 14:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:WBMA-LD logo.svg

    Image is now in the public domain and previous revision was deleted due to size restrictions of non-free images —Salavat (talk) 14:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:My15 WTCN-TV logo.svg

    Image is now in the public domain and previous revision was deleted due to size restrictions of non-free images —Salavat (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    List of sexual orientations

    Based on how things are going at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gender identities this does not appear to have been an uncontroversial deletion —~Kvng (talk) 14:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    • On the contrary, by associating it with the List of gender identities AfD, you have made it controversial! This list was a single edit by the creator who did not contest the PROD, which was endorsed by 2 other editors. The list was a work in progress, did not have references or links, and as the PROD suggested, appears to peter out half way through. I would suggest draftification, so that references or additional entries can be added. Jay (talk) 08:09, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      @Jay yeah and my point is that PROD should not be used for controversial deletions and, in my judgement, it was in this case. I oppose the suggestion to restore this as a draft. If you'd like to bring it to WP:AFD once it is restored, you're allowed to do that. I would expect the results there to be similar to what we see at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of gender identities. ~Kvng (talk) 16:39, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      If your point is this was a controversial deletion, then WP:Requests for undeletion is not the right forum, as this is for restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion. Jay (talk) 19:47, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      Look, this was deleted through PROD, there was no discussion, I think there should have been discussion. Anyone may request such articles be restored and AFAIK there are no grounds for rejecting this request. ~Kvng (talk) 12:57, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:MarkMeets Media

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it as MarkMeets Media is Work in progress. Thank you. 2A02:C7F:5190:6700:B1AF:CCDA:3208:7D14 (talk) 16:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Jang Ji-hun

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jang Ji-hun. With 76 games in the KBO League (which previously was in NBASE, giving a presumption of notability for all with more than one game) I would say he is probably notable. —BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Yes, I noted that "participation only" is no longer a way to bypass sourcing requirements. Also, as a extra sidebar, the SNG says that "stats only" articles are not OK. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 17:31, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Geoffrey Aori Mabea

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Dukksh (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    I would like to request the undeletion of this article. The notability seem clear and would like to make more edits. Dukksh (talk) 19:04, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    checkY Restored Draft:Geoffrey Aori Mabea. Jay (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:The Valiant (comics)

    Hi, I'm LonerXL, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. LonerXL (talk) 21:58, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise. Jay (talk) 16:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Glenn Hartelius

    Hi, I'm Transpersonalgeek, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Transpersonalgeek (talk) 23:25, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 16:17, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Turboprop Flight Simulator

    Hi, I'm Emery Cool21, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Emery Cool21 (talk) 06:23, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Jay (talk) 16:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Philip Kapneck

    Hi, I'm Photoloop, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. The Trade Ambassador passed away. I was in the process of cleaning up the entry, but was sidetracked by other work. I'd like to complete that work in July because he was a significant contributor to the State of Maryland under multiple governors. Thank you. Photoloop (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    checkY Restored. This was last reviewed in 2018, but you have made several changes since. It may be a good time to submit it again. Jay (talk) 15:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Purshottam Lal

    I am a Free Contributor to Wikipedia. An Article on Purshottam Lal, created on 27 January 2022 by Ms Sneha was deleted on 26 April 2022 after a deletion discussion(she later got blocked) Review request  was filed vide link below: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2022_June_5 It has been, inter alia, advised that for improving the Article by adding additional References etc, requests could be made by going  to WP:REFUND Hence, this request for restoring the Article as a draft for the above purpose. —103.87.26.156 (talk) 14:56, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Bosc de Moragas

    Hi, I'm XavierVeciana, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. XavierVeciana (talk) 15:51, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 17:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Loren E. Wold

    Hi, I'm MerryLindsey, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. MerryLindsey (talk) 16:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Jay (talk) 17:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    File:PandoraJewel.svg

    Image is in the public domain per {{PD-textlogo}}, requesting undeletion of hidden file rev deleted per WP:F5. —HouseBlastertalk 16:29, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:NoPixel

    Hi, I'm Instinkertje, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Instinkertje (talk) 22:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Jay (talk) 01:26, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Steve Cutler (disambiguation)

    Disambiguation page is now needed again. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. Jay (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:TypeTogether

    Hi, I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. 77.87.241.26 (talk) 08:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Sparta remix

    Hi, I'm Kazan Zabur 2.0, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Kazan Zabur 2.0 (talk) 08:49, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page Draft:Sparta remix has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Jay (talk) 09:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Aerofly FS

    I want to improve the page so it can be notable —Emery Cool21 (talk) 11:08, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    checkY Restored Draft:Aerofly FS. Jay (talk) 11:29, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Tech Savvy Youth

    Hi, I'm Vismaypikachu, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Vismaypikachu (talk) 16:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jason DeShaw

    Hi, I'm Brianosaurus, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Brianosaurus (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Oyinkansola Alabi

    Hi, I'm Kizule, and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page so that I can make edits to it. Thank you. Kizule (talk) 20:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=1091860926"