Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions
→Phnom Voar: moved to next next update sans image |
|||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
===Articles created/expanded on January 23=== |
===Articles created/expanded on January 23=== |
||
<!-- Please add your suggestion using either the template provided or a level 4 header with the name of the new/expanded article. PLEASE leave spaces between the nominations. It helps those reviewing ... and picking --> |
<!-- Please add your suggestion using either the template provided or a level 4 header with the name of the new/expanded article. PLEASE leave spaces between the nominations. It helps those reviewing ... and picking --> |
||
====[[The Hunters of Kentucky]]==== |
|||
{{DYKsuggestion<!--Please do not copy this code or use {{DYKsuggestion}} directly for nominating. Instead, use {{subst:DYKsug}} as described in the header.--> |
|||
| hook = ... that '''''[[The Hunters of Kentucky]]''''', which commemorated the [[Battle of New Orleans]], was used as [[Andrew Jackson]]'s 1828 campaign song? |
|||
| creator = Bedford |
|||
| creator2 = |
|||
| creator3 = |
|||
| creator4 = |
|||
| expander = |
|||
| expander2 = |
|||
| expander3 = |
|||
| nominator = |
|||
| comment = |
|||
| image = The Hunters of Kentucky.gif |
|||
| credits = |
|||
*{{DYKmake|The Hunters of Kentucky|Bedford}} |
|||
}} at 06:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:* |
|||
{{-}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line.--> |
|||
====[[Howard Norman]]==== |
====[[Howard Norman]]==== |
Revision as of 06:25, 23 January 2009
This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.
Instructions
Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.
DYK criteria
Sample DYK suggestion strings
Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.
- Nom without image:
{{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
- Nom with image:
{{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
- To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook:
|article2=
|article3=
|article4=
| (etc) - To include more than one author:
|author2=
|author3=
| (etc) - To include alternate hooks:
|ALT1=
|ALT2=
| (etc) - To add a comment:
|comment=
- To add the article you reviewed:
|reviewed=
- To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook:
Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.
An example of how to use the template is given below:
{{subst:DYKsug | article = Example | hook = ... that this [[article]] is an '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''? | creator = Jimbo Wales | expander = | nominator = | image = Example.png | comment = }}
- Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
- When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
- Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
- If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|November 9}} Thanks, ~~~~
Symbols
If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:
Symbol | Code | DYK Ready? | Description |
---|---|---|---|
{{subst:DYKtick}} | Yes | No problems, ready for DYK | |
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} | Yes | Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith | |
{{subst:DYK?}} | Query | DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
| |
{{subst:DYK?no}} | Maybe | DYK eligibility requires additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
| |
{{subst:DYKno}} | No | Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible |
Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem}} on the user's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.
Backlogged?
This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.
Where is my hook?
If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings.
If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.
Candidate entries
Articles created/expanded on January 23
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- ... that fifty-two of Sholto Johnstone Douglas's paintings of First World War "dazzle ships" (dazzle camouflage pictured) are in the Imperial War Museum? - new, self-nom by Xn4 (talk) 03:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 22
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Before anyone complains about the "length delta", go back in the article history to the last major version - it consists entirely of text copy and pasted from another source. The current version is completely new, in spite of the original being created recently. Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:53, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- The expansion is enough, but it isn't because "the last major version ... consists entirely of text copy and pasted from another source" (see Additional Rule A4). It's because that version consists mainly of a block quote, which isn't considered "prose" requiring expansion (Additional Rule A2), a list, and references, which also aren't "prose" (WP:DYK#Selection criteria 2.) Art LaPella (talk) 05:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think it should be "...are forbidden from mentioning that a defendant has refused to testify." Grsz11 23:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed above, thanks. Tempshill (talk) 01:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article suffers from plagiarism of source, i.e. sections of text (including the text the hook is composed from) are lifted from the source. Jappalang (talk) 23:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:14, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, >1500 characters, and sources verified. Jappalang (talk) 23:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Hayao Miyazaki's 1984 science fiction animated film Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind was an influence on the stage designs of the video game Alisia Dragoon? Jappalang (talk) 14:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that Alisia Dragoon was one of the first few video games to challenge gender bias, featuring a female character in a leading role who is capable of defending herself without male help? Jappalang (talk) 14:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Frontpage advertising on Wikipedia for a new publication? --74.14.22.20 (talk) 16:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- No. I wrote a new article and I think I could get a DYK. That is all. Alientraveller (talk) 17:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Currently on the market? Fine for a new article: I agree that it's not so good for the Main Page.--Wetman (talk) 02:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- ... that both Charles Langbridge Morgan, a civil engineer, and his son Charles Langbridge Morgan, a playwright and novelist, served in the British Armed Forces during the First World War? - new article, self nom - Dumelow (talk) 13:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 12:10, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just one ref? --74.14.22.20 (talk) 16:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Great pictures in this one. (ahh, didn't see the link...) Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 21
Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:38, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- This article is totally based on primary sources (information from the Port authorities in the Tokyo Government). Wikipedia is based on the principles of mostly using secondary sources removed from the subject (WP:V). This should be so especially for information that could be contested such as claims of being the first as per this case. A search on Google books, bring up independent sources such as these, that should be used to build the article (and source for the hook) instead. Jappalang (talk) 01:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've added a new source. Mario1987 09:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:01, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- This needs rephrasing not to sound daffy: none of the Founding Fathers was born inside of the United States.--Wetman (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you still think this hook is not perfect, can you suggest an alternative?—Chris! ct 21:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT 1: ... that Alexander Hamilton was the first Cabinet member to be born outside of the United States?—Chris! ct 21:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you still think this hook is not perfect, can you suggest an alternative?—Chris! ct 21:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- This needs rephrasing not to sound daffy: none of the Founding Fathers was born inside of the United States.--Wetman (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
{{Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan (Urdu: نصرت فتح على خاں, October 13, 1948 – August 16, 1997), was a Pakistani musician, primarily a singer of Qawwali, the devotional music of the Sufis (a mystical tradition within Islam). He featured in Time magazine's 2006 list of 'Asian Heroes'.[1] Among other honorary titles bestowed upon him, Nusrat was called Shahenshah-e-Qawwali, meaning The Emperor of Qawwali. Nusrat reached out to Western audiences through his collaborations with Canadian musician, Michael Brook and his work with Pearl Jam lead singer Eddie Vedder in 1995 on the soundtrack to Dead Man Walking. He went on to gain popularity in the West through his contributions to the soundtracks of The Last Temptation of Christ and Natural Born Killers, together with his friendship with Peter Gabriel. Nusrat was unhappy with the use of his vocals on the Natural Born Killers soundtrack, stating that the nature of the film was contrary to the beliefs and the ideals conveyed in his work.]) 06:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amirkhan thekhan (talk • contribs) 10:57, 22 January 2009 UTC (UTC)
- This is not a new article as defined by the DYK rules. Also please read the "Instructions" at the top of this page to see how to submit a DYK nomination. Thanks. --Bruce1eetalk 11:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article is subject of a merge discussion, and shouldn't be featured while that is ongoing. Also, Rodale in the hook links to a dab page. Finally, I don't think the Tan picture is necessary. Politizer talk/contribs 20:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Also, the hook is pretty lackluster. Housecleaning is a basic and common thing; of course it has books published on it. We'll need a different hook suggestion before we can proceed (and actually, the merge discussion will have to be completed before we can proceed with that, anyway). Politizer talk/contribs 20:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Let's not put that cutesy little image on the Wikipedia main page.--Wetman (talk) 06:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article was created on January 11, so it can't be called new by any stretch of the imagination. - Mgm|(talk) 12:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- ... that the remnants of 2005's Tropical Depression Ten partially contributed to the formation of Hurricane Katrina? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Filipinos are estimated to be the second-largest group of foreign workers in Qatar by the end of 2009? SpencerT♦C 17:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Appomattox Court House National Historical Park and Old Appomattox Court House and McLean house and Clover Hill Tavern and New County Jail and Jones Law Office and Woodson Law Office and Plunkett-Meeks Store and Bocock-Isbell House and Peers House and Mariah Wright House and Charles Sweeney Cabin and Sweeney-Conner Cabin and Sweeney Prizery and Appomattox Court House National Historical Park ruins and Appomattox Court House National Historical Park cemeteries
... that the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (pictured), an antebellum village containing the Old Appomattox Court House, McLean house, Clover Hill Tavern, New County Jail, Jones Law Office, Woodson Law Office, Plunkett-Meeks Store, Bocock-Isbell House, Peers House, Mariah Wright House, Charles Sweeney Cabin, Sweeney-Conner Cabin, Sweeney Prizery, various park ruins and park cemeteries, is where the American Civil War ended? 16 article hook, all new articles. self nom by --Doug Coldwell talk 13:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yikes! Alt: ... that the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (pictured) is an antebellum village containing 13 historical buildings along with cemeteries and various ruins? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose to the ALT because I would like to get all 16 articles in the same hook, a record DYK for the Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame. All 16 articles are new articles that qualify. --Doug Coldwell talk 16:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- As I see it, the whole idea of DYK is to show new articles to readers. In this case a reader who is really interested in all 16 articles will find them all by reading the first. Even if that is not the purpose of DYK, I do know that the purpose of DYK does not include writing hooks in odd ways solely to get on a "hall of fame". Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose to the ALT because I would like to get all 16 articles in the same hook, a record DYK for the Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame. All 16 articles are new articles that qualify. --Doug Coldwell talk 16:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Would all of them even withstand an AfD? Grsz11 17:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- IMO, this game of trying to cram the largest possible number of articles into a single hook is contrary to the purpose of DYK. The original hook proposed here is much too large to have any useful value in attracting attention to interesting new articles. If this is what Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame leads to, then perhaps the Hall of Fame should be abolished. --Orlady (talk) 18:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Second Orlady's comment. We have already been subject to some nasty criticism for perceived award-collecting behavior, and putting an overlinked mass on the Main Page just for one user's gratification would not be appropriate and would subject us to more unneeded wikidrama. (No intention there to offend you, Doug Coldwell—you've done impressive work here and, no matter what happens with this hook, we will still remember that you were able to write and nominate 16 articles at once—it's just that this kind of hook would not be beneficial for the DYK project or for readers.)
- Besides, if you break this up into a couple hooks (assuming that a few of these article subjects are notable enough to be in a hook independent of Appomattox Court House National Historical Park), your articles would get more airtime and more attention.
- Personally, I believe it would be better to merge all those sub-articles into Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (that might even make it a good candidate for FL or FA), but this is not the appropriate venue for that discussion; it might be worth discussing at that article's talk page, though. That kind of merge, though, would make the ALT hook fine. Politizer talk/contribs 18:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- IMO, this game of trying to cram the largest possible number of articles into a single hook is contrary to the purpose of DYK. The original hook proposed here is much too large to have any useful value in attracting attention to interesting new articles. If this is what Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame leads to, then perhaps the Hall of Fame should be abolished. --Orlady (talk) 18:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Suggest the below alternate hook of 14 articles which I believe would receive much airtime for all the articles involved, especially if it were to be the first hook in the Queue with its pictute. It isn't anything different than what has already been done for the 8, 9, and 11 article DYKs in the Wikipedia:Did you know/Hall of Fame.
- Alt 2 ... that the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (pictured), where the American Civil War ended, contains period structures of the Old Appomattox Court House, McLean house, Clover Hill Tavern, New County Jail, Jones Law Office, Woodson Law Office, Plunkett-Meeks Store, Bocock-Isbell House, Peers House, Mariah Wright House, Charles Sweeney Cabin, Sweeney-Conner Cabin and the Sweeney Prizery? 14 new articles, self nom by --Doug Coldwell talk 09:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Doug, you need an interesting fact to make a good DYK hook. The end of the American Civil War has nothing to do with most of your hook! --74.14.22.20 (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Each of the period (Civil War) structures says in each article of that particular structure that the National Park Service says the structure is significant because it was in the Appomattox Court House National Historical Park (then the village of Appomattox Court House) at the time General Lee surrendered to General Grant. The end of the American Civil War has everything to do with each of these structures. The National Park Service has restored each of these structures because of this significance and they are all part of this history (the end of the American Civil War). Some have more important significance than others. For example: the McLean house is where Lee and Grant signed the surrender papers (picture of replica tables in the article). The Clover Hill Tavern is where the pardons (picture in the article of a typical parole) were printed for the Confederate soldiers, so they could return home with no hassle from others. --Doug Coldwell talk 19:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:27, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article relies entirely on a single source, hook fact is not directly cited. - Dravecky (talk) 08:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hook explicitly stated and cited now. Another source added, although I don't see where having one source for a short article is a problem, especially if that source happens to be one of the top, peer-reviewed scientific journals in existence. Anyway, I'll stick the original taxon description in when/if I find it. Seems like a much older, rather obscure taxon. Shrumster (talk) 09:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, date, hook's ref verified. Rosiestep (talk) 20:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Lucques, Aglandau, Salonenque, Picholine, Olivière, Tanche, Bouteillan, Cailletier, Grossane, Germaine, Cayon, Sabine
Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 20
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I love this hook but the source article seems dubious that any such law existed and the article describes two contradictory reasons for the two clocks. The hook needs rewording to make clear that this is "according to employees" or some other mild but acceptable weaseling. - Dravecky (talk) 08:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I like this one too. Just sneak in the word "allegedly" somewhere, that always works. Lampman (talk) 19:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- ...(ALT) that George Webb Restaurants have two clocks that employees say were set one minute apart to evade a local law banning businesses from being open 24 hours per day? Royalbroil 03:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- ...(ALT2) that employees at George Webb Restaurants say that locations have two clocks which were set one minute apart to evade a local law banning businesses from being open 24 hours per day? Royalbroil 03:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- All the citations are from one reference, a foreign-language book, unavailable online. I was wondering if the TT Class 8 was also mentioned in other sources, for example, the news? Rosiestep (talk) 20:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'd say that books are preferable; at the very least not a drawback. Punkmorten (talk) 21:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's not really unusual to crash/fall. Other than that, the skier has absolutely no achievements in the sport... Punkmorten (talk) 10:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:22, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ... that the Frisians and Franks fought several wars during the 7th and 8th century, which would eventually end with the last uprising of the Frisians in 793? Pindanl (talk) 21:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:34, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- When and where did this happen? The hook should give a bit more context. "Where" could be done by something like "India's Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party"; "when" could be something like "that in 1962, because of differences...." How does that all sound? Politizer talk/contribs 21:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT... that in 1962, because of differences in the demands for a separate nation called Dravida Nadu, India's Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam party split and a short-lived Tamil National Party was formed?
- You are right. The original hook was indeed too vague. Does the alt look OK? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 22:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- No citing of inline source to support this statement (in fact, article is mostly uncited). Jappalang (talk) 00:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hook is cited here: [1] which is the same cite used in the article. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 01:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- DYK Rules No. 3. "The hook fact must be cited in the article with an inline citation, ... The hook fact must have an inline citation right after it since the fact is an extraordinary claim, ..."; this is not done in this article for this hook. Jappalang (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Do you mean like this: [2]. It now has a direct inline cite directly following the fact in question. Is there anything else you need me to fix? --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
[[Image:Symbol confirmed.svg|18px]]Hook's length, article's >1500 characters, and sources (reliability and inline for hook) verified. Note that article is, however, tagged with multiple issues (lack of citations, need for copyediting, and peacock terms). Jappalang (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- DYK Rules No. 3 also says "The hook should include a definite fact that must be mentioned in the article." The hook can't say "may have". Something "may have" happened is not a definite fact. --74.14.22.20 (talk) 16:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- In light of this, should this hook be a {{DYK?no}} or {{DYKno}}? Jappalang (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that noted Canadian bootlegger and businessman James Scott Cooper was reported by his wife to have drowned after going overboard on a transatlantic voyage in 1931, but no body was ever found? --Jayron32.talk.contribs 05:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Per the above, but the phrasing of ALT1 are of definite facts. Jappalang (talk) 05:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Interesting. This might be banal but Anderson spelled "Doctor" in full, so since the quote uses the abbreviated form, did it come from The Gentleman's Magazine (which requires a volume number)? Jappalang (talk) 00:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Mea culpa, for some reason I thought the GM hadn't used the full title. Fixed and volume added. Benea (talk) 01:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, >1500 characters, and sources verified. Jappalang (talk) 15:22, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:44, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:17, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- The same image was submitted by User:Arsenikk at Jan. 15, for the Gråkallbanen (company) nomination. --Poeticbent talk 18:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ... that Alexander Ross was Engineer-in-Chief of the Breydon Viaduct? - new articles self nom - Dumelow (talk) 15:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lengths are okay. But the main WP:V reference (for both articles) links to a pay-site. The other ref, mentioned at Breydon Viaduct (but not at Alexander Ross) does confirm his connection to the project by not his title. I'm AGF that the subscription site states it fully and correctly. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 05:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- For anyone interested the list of staff on the viaduct from the subscription site reads: "Mr. Alexander Ross, M. Inst. C.E., as Engineer-in-Chief, and Mr. William Marriott, M. Inst. C.E., District Engineer and Locomotive Superintendent to the Midland and Great Northern Railways Joint Committee, as executive Engineer, to whom Mr. Graham Gribble M. Inst. C.E., acted as Chief Assistant, and Mr. A. E. Glennie as Resident Engineer...". The article was written by Marriott and Gribble so hopefully they could remember the roles OK! Many thanks - Dumelow (talk) 12:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that after four years being closed to vehicular traffic, Manila's Rizal Avenue was reopened in 2008 after complaints from shopkeepers? –Howard the Duck 14:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that after surviving 1945's Battle of Manila, Avenue Theater along Rizal Avenue was demolished in 2006 in order to turn it into a parking lot? –Howard the Duck 14:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm open to suggestions on how to improve the hook. It doesn't yet mention he did both the audition processes at the same time (that is during the same period). I would actually like to use another hook, that is more interesting in my opinion: "... that child actor Asa Butterfield appeared on the cover of Patrick Skene Catling's autobiography Better Than Working?" Unfortunately, the redlinks are proving hard to fix. Any help on that count is very welcome. - Mgm|(talk) 11:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- For anyone who is wondering. That fact tag is for a ref I read but have to dig up for full publication details. I'll add it tomorrow. - Mgm|(talk) 23:11, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that child actor Asa Butterfield appeared on the cover of Patrick Skene Catling's autobiography Better Than Working? - Mgm|(talk) 09:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- with thanks to User:MichaelQSchmidt. - Mgm|(talk) 09:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:05, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- This claims comes from sources associated with the company. Third party sources do not state is as fact, but merely attribute it to the company. Also, the claim is about the core ASIC, not the whole router. Xasodfuih (talk) 20:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Juniper Networks' first product M40 router Internet Processor ASIC was capable of forwarding packets at 40 Mpps, a capacity more than 100 times faster than that of any other available router architectures at that time?
- Added a more precise hook with added new references -- Tinu Cherian - 06:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- That hooks seems over 200 chars. How about using fewer proprietary terms in it?
- ALT2: ... that Juniper Networks' first product, the M40 router, had a forwarding plane ASIC designed for 40Mpps—a throughput 100 times faster than that of any core router available at that time?
- Also, you haven't really improved the quality of the sources, just their quantity: more press releases, juniper web pages, CTO interviews, but not a single 3rd party hands-on assessment of the that statement. Some third party must have benchmarked the M40 in the past 10 years...
- There seems to be some formatting error in the references of that section as well. Xasodfuih (talk) 00:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Added a more precise hook with added new references -- Tinu Cherian - 06:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Verified Gary King (talk) 01:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article only cites on one source. It seems reliable, but it's an obituary, which could be biased. Otherwise, length and date check out. Shubinator (talk) 04:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's an obit in a scientific journal, so it's probably OK. That said, it's actually got the date of his appointment as an MBE wrong, it was 1971, not 1972 - I've added the official record of the appointment as an additional reference, I've tweaked the hook slightly, the usual "standard" seems to be to link the full grade and name of the honour. David Underdown (talk) 10:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, date, reference good. Article should be cleaned up a bit; there are quite a few run-on sentences. I'll see if I can get to it later in the day. Shubinator (talk) 18:20, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks to those who have improved the article. Maias (talk) 22:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's an obit in a scientific journal, so it's probably OK. That said, it's actually got the date of his appointment as an MBE wrong, it was 1971, not 1972 - I've added the official record of the appointment as an additional reference, I've tweaked the hook slightly, the usual "standard" seems to be to link the full grade and name of the honour. David Underdown (talk) 10:36, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length and dates okay, offline reference AGF. - Dravecky (talk) 10:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ... that Pat Riley is the only Miami Heat head coach to have won the NBA championship with the Miami Heat, having won it in the 2006 NBA Finals? New article, self-nom by -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 review me 01:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
-
- Hope this is better... -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24 review me 02:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I dunno, but doesn't everyone know this already? How about SVG being "traded" to the Magic for draft picks? Or is it not in the article? That's a pretty unconventional way of obtaining draft picks. –Howard the Duck 03:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- I can't find a reference for that though. Here's an alternate hook...
- Hope this is better... -- SRE.K.A
ALT1 ... that Ron Rothstein was the first head coach of the Miami Heat, an American professional basketball team based in Miami, Florida? -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 review me 06:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- This one's more interesting that the original. –Howard the Duck 06:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lengths and ref meet criteria. Though I would suggest including the fact that there was liquor in the punch bowls, which is the real reason party goers left. Otherwise, it seems to read that they left for empty punch bowls? ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 06:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 19
Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:33, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment/explanation. Added a bunch of references on the 14th and 15th but actual article text expansion was begun on the 19th. Hope that's ok. Shrumster (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, it's OK, because we don't include references when counting characters of prose. So the 9x expansion figure is about the same whether you calculate it from the 14th or the 19th. Art LaPella (talk) 18:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment/explanation. Added a bunch of references on the 14th and 15th but actual article text expansion was begun on the 19th. Hope that's ok. Shrumster (talk) 08:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, 5x expansion, and source verified. Jappalang (talk) 09:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Expansion and date ok, offline refs accepted in good faith. --Bruce1eetalk 10:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- The above hook is 202 characters I think.
- Alt hook: ... that in 2006, Oregon's per capita drug use exceeded the national average? The most used substances were marijuana, methamphetamine and illicit painkillers and stimulants.
- I didn't do enough tildes before. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 08:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Shouldn't that be Soviet Bloc? - 17:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:01, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Expansion and date ok, offline hook refs accepted in good faith. --Bruce1eetalk 10:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:49, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Is not OK, surely......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- The article has not been expanded enough, so far it's been expanded 3.1x. Also, the hook is implied but not explicitly stated (the article does not explicitly say the park has no lions). Shubinator (talk) 00:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- It (the hook) does now. (I hope) – Julia Rossi (talk) 07:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Reference is good; expansion is at 3.6x though. Shubinator (talk) 21:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:16, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- For any other reviewers thinking we'd already done this, it was a hook for editor Thomas Congdon earlier this month that discussed the novel. (How did we not have an article about this book until now?) - Dravecky (talk) 00:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- That twenty could be 20. Julia Rossi (talk) 07:54, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, didn't realise about Congon: it was a different fact, though. Last night, I finally decided to devote a couple of free hours to it. The JPStalk to me 09:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- alt 1 ... that the USOC awarded medals to Sam Stoller and Marty Glickman 62 years after the only two Jews on the U.S. track team were pulled from the 400-meter relay team at the 1936 Berlin Olympics? Cbl62 (talk) 21:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed typo (yeas->years) and suggest the(se) only two Jews... Julia Rossi (talk) 07:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion Lordoliver Lord R. Oliver I His Lordship's Court 21:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article hasn't been expanded enough, only 3.5x now by my count. Unfortunately tables and lists don't count. Also, to me the hook was a bit confusing because I didn't know that the promotion refers to WWE. Rephrasing to due to his contract with WWE would help. Shubinator (talk) 00:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Eh, I forgot to count. Your suggestion would work, but it makes no difference really since its not technically 5x.TRUCO 01:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- You've still got a few days to expand it. Shubinator (talk) 02:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- There isn't really much more to add to the list in order to add 2,000 more characters of prose.--TRUCO 04:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 20:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:34, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- No inline citation for hook. Shubinator (talk) 22:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Rejigged refs to fix this. Mjroots (talk) 22:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Date, length good. Offline reference accepted by AGF. Interesting article. Shubinator (talk) 22:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article has been written gradually since December 29. The expansion from 5 days ago until now is just 9k to 11k. Therefore, article is too old. Politizer talk/contribs 17:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length 4,987 characters and source verified - Mario1987 14:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:42, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- 249 character hook. Also, the hook is not explicitly stated in the article. The article has been expanded much more than 5x though. Also (this has nothing to do with DYK), I'd recommend moving the "See also" (now called "More info") before the References section per WP:ALSO. Shubinator (talk) 02:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh gosh... I knew it's a lot more than 5x, but once I got started I wanted it to be worthy of Wiki and just kept going. I have moved the "See also" per your good advice. As for the hook... I was worried about that. I liked it, but in complete agreement with you, here's a shorter and more precise alternate:
- ... that that the four-part A&E documentary series The Greatest Pharaohs is being used in many Colleges and Universities courses teaching Anthropology and Archaeology?
- The hook length is much better, but it still isn't explicitly stated in the article. The grammar of the hook needs tweaking...maybe this is better:
- ... that that the four-part A&E documentary series The Greatest Pharaohs is being used in many college and university courses on anthropology and archaeology?
- Shubinator (talk) 03:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- To clarify: the article does state that it is in the libraries of numerous universities and colleges, but doesn't say the video series is being used in the classroom. Shubinator (talk) 03:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing the way. I looked over the paragraph's cites to ensure that the film is listed in either a course sylabus, the course's media library, or course media requirement and rewrote the sentence to clarify the asssertion of the hook. The library stuff is now in a different sentence. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- AND I do very much like your cleaner hook. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 03:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm still unsure the series is being used in courses, but I'll accept it per AGF. Shubinator (talk) 04:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note to reviewer: Expansion is fivefold if infobox, etc. are not counted. Thanks, GaryColemanFan (talk) 06:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, 5x expansion, and source verified. Jappalang (talk) 12:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Looking back over it, I don't like the repitition of "promised". If someone wants to reword it slightly when adding it to a queue, that's fine with me. Perhaps "guaranteed" to replace the first one, or "assured"/"told" for the second? GaryColemanFan (talk) 15:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- ... that a Liveline phone-in debate on gay adoption staged by stand-in presenter Evelyn O'Rourke in February 2007 led to two-thirds of the total complaints issued against the radio show in the following six months? (new article, self-nom) --➨♀♂Candlewicke ST # :) 03:04, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 18
Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image, length, and 5x expansion verified. Source is an off-line book, accepted in good faith. Jappalang (talk) 03:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT ... that the Prague Aviation Museum, Kbely now comprises 275 aircraft, of which approximately 110 are on public display? --Vejvančický (talk) 00:32, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length and date ok, offline hook refs accepted in good faith. An impressive piece of work! --Bruce1eetalk 10:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- should it not be "...the world's rarest overprinted stamp"? Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Gothic Revival should at least be the link, if not what the hook says. Johnbod (talk)
- ALT hook: ... that the Cheshire landowner Rowland Egerton-Warburton wrote poetry and some of his rhymes are still present on signposts in his estate?
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lengths clear (hook is 199). Taking print references on good faith. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 06:25, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know what to say but it's not that interesting. Mario1987 14:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is the only example I've ever heard of a fungus being used as fish bait, thought that might warrant a DYK. Are any of the following more interesting to you? Sasata (talk) 16:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that Cookeina is a genus of cup fungus found in the tropics and subtropics?
- ALT3 ... that Cookeina, a genus of tropical and subtropical cup fungi, have asci which mature simultaneously rather than in series?
- In the original hook, does the offline source really mean a Malaysian town called "Peninsular"? It probably means Peninsular Malaysia (no comma, one link; it was once known as Malaya). The Peninsular link is about Spain. Art LaPella (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Good catch, I've fixed the hook above. Thanks - Sasata (talk) 04:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- In the original hook, does the offline source really mean a Malaysian town called "Peninsular"? It probably means Peninsular Malaysia (no comma, one link; it was once known as Malaya). The Peninsular link is about Spain. Art LaPella (talk) 02:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lengths and reference clear. Good to go. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 06:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Both articles still need some cleanup before promotion. Strike article has repeated phrases ("Workers at the Daily News settled their issues, accepting raises of $8 per week in talks mediated by United States Secretary of Labor W. Willard Wirtz") and other grammar issues. - Dravecky (talk) 03:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for catching the near-duplicate sentences. I have reviewed both articles and I think all issues have been addressed. Please let me know if you have any other questions regarding either article. Alansohn (talk) 05:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:54, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
-
- How about this:
- "... that the Amagi class battlecruisers were to be canceled due to the Five-Power Treaty, but an exemption saved Akagi, which (after conversion to an aircraft carrier) took part in the attack on Pearl Harbor?"
- Should be around 204 characters (while not under the 200 limit, it's close enough, I think). Parsecboy (talk) 03:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Actually, see here for the most current version.Parsecboy (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)- Alright; we expanded a second article. I know that this is long, but it is by far the best hook we could come up with:
- ... that the Error: {{sclass}} invalid format code: 6. Should be 0–5, or blank (help)s and Error: {{sclass}} invalid format code: 6. Should be 0–5, or blank (help)s were slated to be scrapped in accordance with the Washington Naval Treaty, but a special exception sought by the U.S. delegation saved both Kaga and Akagi, which (after conversions to aircraft carriers) later took part in the attack on Pearl Harbor?
- Would "against the U.S." be needed at the end of the hook? —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 00:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that, saved from the scrap pile by a special exception sought by the U.S. delegation, Akagi, an Amagi class warship, and both Kaga, a Tosa class, were converted to aircraft carriers that later attacked Pearl Harbor? Jappalang (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- 215 characters, but the Tosa mention is 19-characters, so it should be a reasonable exceeding of the 200-byte guideline... Jappalang (talk) 05:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Alright; we expanded a second article. I know that this is long, but it is by far the best hook we could come up with:
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, >1500 (2536) characters (seems more like a new article), image, and source verified. Jappalang (talk) 01:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- References were not originally explicitly stated, nor were completion dates of the buildings. Added dates and references so I can pass this for DYK. See revision comparison. Is now good to go, though. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 06:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yep! Nice work, but there were some errors; I've corrected them. AdjustShift (talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lenght OK, reference OK and hook OK. Mario1987 11:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT: ... that college football player Bob Ward is the only player to have been selected by the Associated Press as a first-team All-American in both an offensive and defensive position? Strikehold (talk) 16:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, >1500 characters, and source verified. Jappalang (talk) 12:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:33, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- In a statement like this, the date is always relevant.=--Wetman (talk)
- ... that the 1983 song "Everyday I Write the Book" was Elvis Costello's first hit single in the United States? Boston (talk) 01:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT:... that Elvis Costello called his 1983 hit single Everyday I Write the Book "a bad Smokey Robinson song"? --Boston (talk) 08:39, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- In a statement like this, the date is always relevant.=--Wetman (talk)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Date, length, reference good. Shubinator (talk) 03:46, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Verified. Ref 3 checks out. Hard to believe something like this wasn't created yet. — RyanCross (talk) 06:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:49, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- I made a small alteration to the hook (rewording), the article's age and size check out as well as the hook's reference. - Mgm|(talk) 12:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, >1500 characters, and sources verified. Jappalang (talk) 06:24, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion Ironholds (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length, >1500 characters, and source verified. The lucky devil. Jappalang (talk) 04:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion Algorerhythms (talk) at 02:39, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Length and 5x expansion verified. Sources are off-line newspapers accepted in good faith. Jappalang (talk) 06:31, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion Ironholds (talk) 02:26, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lenght and ref OK. Very amazing because the Germans and Italian were allies. Mario1987 11:13, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- His escape was after Italy switched sides. David Underdown (talk) 11:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion Ironholds (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article only relies on one source. It is from The Daily Telegraph, but it's an obituary, which could be biased. Otherwise, length and date check out. Shubinator (talk) 03:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware multiple sourcing was a criteria for DYK, only that the statement itself be sourced. Why would an obituary be biased? Ironholds (talk) 11:21, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Multiple sourcing is good practice for any article - many of the ones you've submitted recently you could have quite easily verified details of their military service and/or honours using the London Gazette as I've since done for you. Obits have traditionally focussed on the good points of the deceased, so they may not present a fully-rounded picture - this is probably less true now than it has been in the past - and things like the ODNB do often use obits as sources, so this is not to say they shouldn't be sued, just try to find other sources too. David Underdown (talk) 12:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Duly noted. I wasn't aware I'd used the ODNB for anything recently (other than some additional verification of details for the Lord Denning article. I didn't use the Gazette because I wasn't aware statements of fact need to be verified by multiple sources; yes, the Gazette says he was promoted to rank X, but so does the newspaper obit. With these three articles I did try and look for additional sourcing but could not find anything with what was available to me (the military and the sciences are two areas I don't deal with on a daily basis, leaving well, google).Ironholds (talk) 12:31, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wasn't sayign that you had used ODNB recently, just trying to make the point that since they use obits as sources then they must be considered as a valid source for us to - but bearing in mind the possible issues. Obviously the gaette is factual only, but it's also definitive, I've seen obits which have got the dates and so on wrong, if you take the dates from the Gazette you've got the official record - it's the best possible source for those sorts of things - and at least it demonstrates that you ahve looked for other sources. David Underdown (talk) 13:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT: ... that in T.I.'s Road To Redemption, an upcoming reality television show, rapper T.I. will be trying to show seven teenagers that there is "another way" than spending a life of crime?
- ALT 2: ... that in T.I.'s Road To Redemption, an upcoming reality television show, rapper T.I. will be sharing the mistakes he has made in the past and the lessons he has learned from them to teenagers across the United States?
- Note: Would prefer using the first hook and not the ALTs as the first hook contains two pieces of information—March sentencing to prison and reality show. The ALTs only have information on the show, but I just added those hooks there incase. If for some reason the first hook has a problem that needs fixing, go with ALTs. — RyanCross (talk) 09:19, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:52, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 17
Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- AGF because ref is in Polish, lenght OK. Good to go. Mario1987 11:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not much of an expert on how this works, but credit on this one should be shared also by user:Freechild, user:Outsider80, user:Parkwells, and user:Tvoz. It's an intersting subject and article I think, and it's at AfD too which I think gives it bonus points. Someone find a cool photo we can use. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- This cannot be promoted while it's still at AfD. - Dravecky (talk) 09:33, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article was deleted. Royalbroil 03:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:16, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article prose is only about 1300 characters since we can't count the text in a list towards the 1500 character minimum. - Dravecky (talk) 09:43, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think I added at least 207 charachters. And it has a couple photos now too, so it's extra handsome! ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- He added a lot more than 207, for a present total of 3538. Art LaPella (talk) 19:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think I added at least 207 charachters. And it has a couple photos now too, so it's extra handsome! ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:15, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:18, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I got the obviously wrong impression from this hook that Epik continued to write after being executed. Can the information in the hook be re-organized? Maybe some tweaking of the tenses would help, too. --PFHLai (talk) 16:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- That sure would be a good hook if true :) I added the years now so maybe it's clearer? Närking (talk) 20:41, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1 (rephrasing): ... that after being sent to GULAG in 1935, Ukrainian writer Hryhorii Epik continued to write, and even sent one of his works to NKVD in Moscow before his execution during the Great Purge in 1937? Jappalang (talk) 02:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, that's much better and clearer! Thanks! Närking (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- NB:Moved to mainspace Jan 17th. Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT 1: ... that the mushroom species Lactarius camphoratus (Candy cap) has been used as part of a pipe tobacco mix?
- ALT 2: ... that the candy cap mushroom is commercially harvested as a flavoring for sweet foods, like cookies and ice cream? Peter G Werner (talk) 23:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT 1: ... that the "London Cage," a World War II prisoner of war facility commanded by Lt. Col. Alexander Scotland, was beset by allegations of torture?
- ALT1 verified. Images is public domain. Article length and date good. Xasodfuih (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:30, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see why this is an article. Shouldn't this just be a section of Presidency of Barack Obama, with any important events, whether or not they happened in his first 100 days, having their own articles? --NE2 06:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Isn't this just 1600 characters of crystal ball gazing? He's still on day -2 so an article about the first 100 is pure speculation, no matter how well sourced. - Dravecky (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's not really crystal balling "if the event is notable and almost certain to take place". Lampman (talk) 17:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- The article has been nominated for deletion. There is significant support for deletion. I am merely reporting it here. I am not stating an opinion in the AFD or DYK. Chergles (talk) 19:35, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- This article is listed at AfD and, based on the discussion, is almost certainly going to be deleted or merged. - Dravecky (talk) 09:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:41, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Expansion and dates check out, reference accepted in good faith, but this needs a good grammar polish by a native English speaker before it can be promoted. - Dravecky (talk) 08:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
... that three former Wanderers players and Ireland rugby internationals – Tom Crean, Robert Johnston and Frederick Harvey – were all also awarded the Victoria Cross? Crean and Johnston served with the British Army during the Second Boer War while Harvey served with the Canadian Army during the First World War[1] … I know article has not been expanded 5x but I believe this fact is particularly noteworthy and unusual. It has to be more interesting then trivia about wrestlers, surely !!! Djln--Djln (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- But perhaps you didn't know that our 5x rule doesn't include lists, and I've never seen a hook approved in the range of 1.1x. Furthermore, it's a 307 character hook, and "Unwritten" Rule/Additional Rule C5 states "No external links in the hook." Art LaPella (talk) 20:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Very disappointed . Above answer is a lot of waffle. I really cannot be bothered reading reams and reams of unwritten rules ! Should’nt the criteria for this section be simply that fact might encourage people to read the articles further and that is cross checked as true. It is my opinion that DYK section has been extremely poor lately. I hav’nt been inspired to read an article in this section for months. And now I understand why. It has become the preserve of trainspotters, wrestling fans and pedantics ! I really do not see the point in trying to nominate anything. Djln --Djln (talk) 20:51, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry you feel that way, but the main problem isn't the newly renamed "Additional Rules" (formerly "Unwritten Rules"). It's the Main Page description "Did you know ... From Wikipedia's newest articles" (emphasis added), and our bureaucratic rules only clarify that this isn't a new article. Art LaPella (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Djln, quit complaining about how you "can't be bothered" to read the rules. First of all, the rule about expansion is prominently stated in the regular rules, not just the Additional Rules. Secondly, if you're too lazy to read the rules, then you really only have yourself to blame for not getting your article passed; people at DYK didn't force you to ignore the stnadards. Politizer talk/contribs 19:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- The whole point is to expand an article or create a new one, thus it's one of Wikipedia's "newest article" as stated on the Main Page. If all you do is add some stuff and come up with a catchy hook, how is it any special or interesting? Grsz11 20:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- - Prose length, hook reference, and hook length all check out fine. Sunderland06 (talk) 00:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Not interesting - it's just an error in the National Bridge Inventory database. --NE2 06:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is an article about a local county road. What, other than some comical mixup at the federal level, could really offer something interesting to the masses? This is good to go in my opinion. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 06:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's not a "comical mixup" - it's all too familiar when dealing with big databases such as the NBI or Google Maps. --NE2 08:32, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- That doesn't answer my question though. And having worked for New York DOT, I'm well aware of these problems, and in my opinion, they really are nothing short of comical. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 18:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Not every article has "something interesting to the masses". You appear to be easily amused if this error is "comical". --NE2 19:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed. But nothing wrong with being easily amused. Since you don't feel every article must be interesting to the masses, would you mind commenting on my nom, the one just below this? And again, it's comical from an insider's point of view: the inefficiencies of state and federal government is such that they can't get a list like this correct - tax $$ at work. (rolls eyes) ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 04:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is the first time I've been compelled to edit DYK, and I don't have the foggiest idea what this hook is trying to say. Moreover, I don't even see any point in the article about it being a former I-87 bridge. Is this entire hook about this fact: "instead of marking it as County Road 35, the USDOT marked it as Old State Road 35"? Aaronw (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Then what does this say - "The United States Department of Transportation, who maintains a "National Bridge Inventory" has a listing of County Route 35's former bridge over the Northway. However, instead of marking it as County Road 35, the USDOT marked it as Old State Road 35." - Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 01:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's pretty straight forward. You read the hook, you have questions, so you go to the article, which successfully answers your question. The difference is "County Route" versus "State Route" (old in this case). Subtle, but significant (to where your taxes go). ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 04:22, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- Only significant if it made someone screw up and spend the wrong taxes, but the bridge is actually owned and maintained by the state (as it crosses over a state highway) and there's another field ("Maintenance Responsibility / Owner") in the NBI that correctly says so. (Aside: some New York State Routes are in fact county-maintained.) --NE2 04:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Not very interesting. Mario1987 10:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Slightly unfair assessment. To an educator, this is a novel and very different approach to educating our next generation. Those interested in education will most likely want to read more.~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 23:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at Mr Tan (talk) 16:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1 (rephrase to remove possible negative slant): ... that Malaysian royalty's immunity from legal prosecution was removed after an assault incident, involving Tunku Majid of Johor, sparked a constitutional crisis? Jappalang (talk) 05:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:11, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:48, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Hook length, article length both check. Accepting Norwegian reference on good faith. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 05:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 14:08, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- The only reference for the statement brings you to a page at angelfire. While that page references an old Popular Science article (1966), the actual reference is more along the lines of an early blog. The whole page is basically a motorcycle fan page. Hopefully a more definitive reference can be found. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 05:35, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
... that Robert Elliott-Cooper lived for 12 more years after Nature described him as "among the oldest of English engineers"? - self nom, new article - Dumelow (talk) 11:25, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Lengths and reference check. Though I would suggest tossing "the journal" in front of the title of Nature since not everyone knows what this publication is. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 05:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yep that sounds fair enough: ... that Robert Elliott-Cooper lived for 12 more years after the journal Nature described him as "among the oldest of English engineers"?, cheers - Dumelow (talk) 12:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article has less than 750 characters of prose (the list doesn't count). Also, the hook has too much technical jargon. Shubinator (talk) 04:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:46, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- 5x expansion and ref OK. Mario1987 10:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Alt1 ... that a expense recorded in the Pipe rolls were for bags and casks for transporting silver pennies around England?
- Alt1 w/ grammar fixed ... that the Pipe rolls record an expense for bags and casks used to transport silver pennies around England? = Jmabel | Talk 04:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Great article, generally well sourced, but the rules do say that the hook fact must be directly followed by a reference in the text (I'm talking about the first hook here, which I prefer). Should be an easy fix. Lampman (talk) 14:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed. Both hooks should have citations. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:44, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Off-line ref accepted AGF. Lampman (talk) 17:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Should that be "an expense ... was", or "expenses ... were"? Art LaPella (talk) 20:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Couldn't quite figure that one out either, but as I said: I prefer the first hook. That is a significant historical fact, while the second one is just trivia. Lampman (talk) 21:46, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- I prefer the first hook also, and I wasn't sure on the grammar of the second. I think either of the alternates Art gave are correct, but it's a very odd sentence. I'm fine with folks fixing it as they like. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Alt1 ... that a expense recorded in the Pipe rolls were for bags and casks for transporting silver pennies around England?
Expiring noms
Articles created/expanded on January 16
Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:23, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Dates, length, and ref check out but sorting the "make" credits for this one will be a bit of a nightmare. Do we want to give this article a day or two to settle down before promoting it? Given the backlog, even it were promoted right now it wouldn't appear on the home page for about a day and a half. Perhaps by then the article will have been filled out and the editing will start to settle down. - Dravecky (talk) 13:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
You could nominate both the Sullenberger article and the Flight 1549 article for a double DYK. Anyway, here's an alternative hook:... Chesley Sullenberger, pilot of US Airways Flight 1549 (pictured) which successfully ditched in the Hudson River, also runs an aviation safety consultant company and has worked as an accident investigator for the USAF, NTSB, and FAA? Suggested by Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 03:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I think it is a really good hook. Unfortunately, the DYK criteria says "Articles that have appeared on the main page's In the News section are not eligible" to be a DYK nom. Flight 1549 is currently featured on the In The News section. Therefore, I don't think we can have the double hook offered by Matthewedwards. I suggest we remove the Flight 1549 as a DYK nom in the alternative hook, but keep the rest of the alternative hook the same.Terrakyte (talk) 11:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Actually, the alternative hook is too long. Maximum length of a hook is 200 characters (with spaces), and this hook is 231 characters long. Terrakyte (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- You're right, I'd forgot about those two rules. How about, "... that Chesley Sullenberger, the pilot who successfully ditched Flight 1549 in the Hudson River, also runs an aviation safety consultant company and was an accident investigator for the USAF and NTSB?" Gets the same point across, comes in at 197 characters, and the article about the flight is not the DYK nom. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 16:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT2 ... that Chesley Sullenberger, who piloted US Airways Flight 1549 (pictured) to a safe ditching in the Hudson River, had gained the IQ necessary to join Mensa International at the age of 12? Terrakyte (talk) 13:24, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment' Flight 1549 is currently featured on ITN, so can't be bolded in the hook. Mjroots (talk) 17:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I would hold this hook for as long as possible. People who are in the news may have more that is yet to be revealled. He may have hidden notable saintly (or otherwise) qualities which have yet to surface. Victuallers (talk) 12:28, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
ALT 3: ... that C.B. "Sully" Sullenberger, who successfully landed an Airbus A320 in the Hudson River in 2009, operates a safety consulting firm?
Note that there are perhaps hundreds of people who expanded the article. I will notify them for DYK credit if this passes. These people should get credit, not only Jrsamples.
Also, my suggested hook doesn't restate what everyone knows, i.e. that Sully landed the plane. It highlights that he has a safety consulting firm (so he might really be a safety expert who safely landed the plane in the water) Chergles (talk) 19:30, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I agree that more people beside myself, as nominator, and Jrsamples, should gain credit. I apologise that I did not add some more people as collaborators. I don't think everyone who edited the article should be given DYK credit, though. Please don't think that I'm being selfish, or ungratful, I just think that most editors did relatively very minor work, such as correcting grammar, and do not warrant DYK credit. Looking at the revision history of the article, I suggest User:ERcheck, User:Chergles, User talk:75.73.218.164, User:Geo Swan, User:Space cadet65, User:Terrakyte, as well as the creator User:Jrsamples, should receive DYK criteria. Having said that, my suggestions take into account only those who have made more than 5 non-minor edits to the article. One person could have made but one edit, but it was really consequential. I will look through the edit history to find more people who could deserve DYK criteria. I believe the hook offered by Chergles can be improved; I believe less people will recognize "C.B. "Sully" Sullenberger", than Chesley Sullenberger or Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger. I also think that when Mjroots said that US Airways Flight 1549 couldn't be "bolded" in the hook, I don't think that meant it couldn't be included in the overall hook, though I could be wrong. I think US Airways Flight 1549 should be stated, since I believe more people will recognize the flight if the hook says something like "Flight 1549 in the Hudson River", than "an Airbus A320 in the Hudson River". I also think the image at the top of this discussion should be included with this hook, since hooks with pics seem to generally attract more attention. I also think that a lot of people, as you said Chergles, know now that he landed the plane. I think though a lot of people already know that he owns a safety consulting firm, though, and I don't think a lot of people know that he had "had gained the IQ necessary to join Mensa International at the age of 12", and that he "was an accident investigator for the USAF and NTSB". Terrakyte (talk) 23:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- Size and age of article confirmed. Off-line ref accepted in good faith. - Mgm|(talk) 11:52, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:23, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Was it her talent that was only recognized 50 years later, and is that fact in the article? Art LaPella (talk) 20:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Alt ... that the Australian photographer Olive Cotton captured her childhood friend Max Dupain in Fashion shot, Cronulla Sandhills, and married him in 1937? Xn4 (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- The fact is implied in the article. She only became a national "name" with a retrospective at the australian centre for photography in '85, and when the book came out in 1995. I'll summarise it in the introduction. She was "pioneer" because women in their own right were overlooked in the professions in that era but in a way she did make a career of it. Hope this makes sense, otherwise Xn4's alt is very helpful. Julia Rossi (talk) 23:08, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- PS if you use the first, please check my maths, I dated her relative anonymity from 1930s. Otherwise the second is cool. Thanks guys, Julia Rossi (talk) 23:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- I added a comma to the hook to explain that better. Art LaPella (talk) 23:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks so much, Julia Rossi (talk) 00:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure of the protocol on this page re changing assessment tags versus putting a new one at the bottom of discussion, so I'm doing the latter. Looks good now, running with the Alt tagline. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks so much, Julia Rossi (talk) 00:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I added a comma to the hook to explain that better. Art LaPella (talk) 23:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- PS if you use the first, please check my maths, I dated her relative anonymity from 1930s. Otherwise the second is cool. Thanks guys, Julia Rossi (talk) 23:17, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: Byte expansion between 1/12 and 1/16 is slightly less than 5x, however virtually all of the actual prose was written in this time period. --ThaddeusB (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:33, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- 5x expansion and reference OK. That's pretty amazing. Mario1987 10:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is actually a composite hook, but all parts of it are sourced. I'm open to discussion. --Rodhullandemu 14:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Date, length good, offline reference accepted AGF. Shubinator (talk) 04:58, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Article is tagged for expansion and lacks sections.Nrswanson (talk) 23:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- The article was initially created as a stub by Woody, tweaked by several others, and then I expanded it to meet DYK guidelines. The history probably needs a review to determine if anyone else should qualify for DYK credit. David Underdown (talk) 16:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just a comment: I suggest the hook be re-worded slightly as Donaldson's actions where slightly more involved then saving the Afghani interpreter; that was only a part of the action. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 01:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Alternate hook taking in circumstances and trying to avoid it being ITN candidate. Regards, Woody (talk) 00:14, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- ... that Mark Donaldson became the first recipient of the Victoria Cross for Australia, for his gallant actions under enemy fire in Afghanistan on 2 September 2008?
Template:DYKsuggestion at Punkmorten (talk) 11:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- This hook sounds like they were expected to compete in the same events? --74.14.22.41 (talk) 17:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, since they are sisters that's what one'd expect. As the article describes, them competing in different sports there was a first. Punkmorten (talk) 20:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Why would one expect sisters to compete in the same events? Many siblings are polar-opposites of each others. Then, there are people like Venus and Serena Williams who avoid each other in most tourneys, except Grand Slams. --74.14.16.143 (talk) 02:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT: ... that Hedda and Ingrid Berntsen became the first siblings in Norway to compete in different events at the same Olympic Games? It's stated explicitly in ref 1, which is in both articles. Punkmorten (talk) 12:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- According to the prose size tool this one is roughly 80-90 characters too short. I'll ask Raul if he'll expand. - Mgm|(talk) 12:58, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- I've added more than that just now. Johnbod (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Improved the image and added an imagemap Victuallers (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- (Alt)... that The Agnew Clinic (use cursor for names) depicts Dr. Agnew performing a partial mastectomy watched by students and Thomas Eakins who painted it?
- This particular hook is grammatically ambiguous and I think mentioning the painter is stating the obvious. He had to be watching to paint it. - Mgm|(talk) 13:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please suggest an improvement. As it says ...the painting "depicts" him being watched by the painter..this is quite unusual - usually painters do not depict themselves in paimtings. Can you suggest a way to make it less ambiguous? Victuallers (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's not usual but it happens as in Las Meninas which would make the alt hook okay (he was there and he painted it, and shows himself in the scene). It doesn't always follow an artist was present in order to paint a scene. Fwiw, Julia Rossi (talk) 06:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thx for noticing JR. The imagemap on Las Meninas was also my work (and that was a featured article). I have added "(use cursor)" to the hook ... do you think that is sufficient to get the imagemap noticed? Victuallers (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- To my eye yes it's fine as it is – don't know but if its really needed, would it take too many strokes to add "for names" or something like that? congratulations on the FA btw. Good work, Julia Rossi (talk) 22:06, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thx for noticing JR. The imagemap on Las Meninas was also my work (and that was a featured article). I have added "(use cursor)" to the hook ... do you think that is sufficient to get the imagemap noticed? Victuallers (talk) 16:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's not usual but it happens as in Las Meninas which would make the alt hook okay (he was there and he painted it, and shows himself in the scene). It doesn't always follow an artist was present in order to paint a scene. Fwiw, Julia Rossi (talk) 06:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion 08:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Uses unreliable sources like imdb and tv.com.Nrswanson (talk) 20:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please note that IMDb is not inherently an unreliable source, as clarified in this debate. Furthermore, an entire article cannot be disqualified simply on the existence of an unreliable source, as long as the hook fact has proper sourcing. In this case the hook fact seems to be supported by a Penguin Books publication, which should earn it a . Second opinions welcome. Lampman (talk) 21:57, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
- Seems proper argument for hook's verifiability; being slain for that 2-edged sword, imdb is perhaps harsh for an entertainment subject. Julia Rossi (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- But its not just imdb, also the article is currently tagged for unreliable sources.Nrswanson (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Seems proper argument for hook's verifiability; being slain for that 2-edged sword, imdb is perhaps harsh for an entertainment subject. Julia Rossi (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 15
- ... that John Parker, while Archbishop of Tuam, was remembered for the abundance of food and drink served in his palace? - new article, self-nominated by Strawless (talk) 16:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's unclear in the hook if people remembered the food & drink while Parker was the archbishop and forgot after his successor took office, or people remembered the food & drink served during his time as the archbishop. I'm sure it's the latter, but the hook is a bit ambiguous. Is "while Archbishop of Tuam" associated with "remembered" or "served"? I don't know how to fix the hook, though. --74.14.16.33 (talk) 04:08, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I thought that was very clear: "Parker... was remembered", and "food and drink served"; "while Archbishop of Tuam" plainly refers to Parker, and not to a verb, as verbs can't become archbishops. But here is another hook which may be more interesting... Strawless (talk) 21:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Alternative ... that before John Parker became Archbishop of Tuam and of Dublin, he had been imprisoned by Cromwell's forces as a suspected Royalist spy? Strawless (talk) 21:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that Barnet Burns (pictured) toured England from 1835, exhibited his Māori tattoos and recounted his adventures in New Zealand? Monsieur Blanc (talk) 20:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that "Mental Reactions" which was first published in the avant-garde magazine 291 in 1915 is considered the first example of visual poetry in the United States?
- Perhaps I'm wrong, but "Journal" shouldn't be capitalized, right? If anyone has AWB or some other automated system running, please fix the link and everything pointing there. - Mgm|(talk) 13:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 14
Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the book La Question by Henri Alleg about torture by French paratroopers in the Algerian War contained a foreword by Jean-Paul Sartre? - Mgm|(talk) 22:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- ALT2: ... that the book La Question by Henri Alleg describes the torture he claims to have subjected to by French paratroopers in the Algerian War? - Mgm|(talk) 22:56, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
"Unwritten" Rule C1 says "No redlinks in the hook." Art LaPella (talk) 00:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- La redlink est turnée bleue. :) --74.14.17.171 (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
The fact is verifiable but the article is a difficult read due to non-native English being so apparent. Needs more copyediting. Also some "references" (not those for the hook though) are just parenthetical remarks not pointing to any obvious sources. Xasodfuih (talk) 00:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Apparently this is not one of the criteria for DYK. Xasodfuih (talk) 15:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's still fine to oppose/delay a DYK until it is copyedited. Regardless of official rules (although I thought there was a rule about this, but oh well), you can challenge any DYK if you think the article is unfit for being linked from the main page. Politizer talk/contribs 15:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Also, there is large overlap between this article and Henri_Alleg#La_Question_and_Censorship, a section which existed in its current form for at least a year. The fact in the DYK is mentioned there too. The narrative of the book is mostly covered at Henri_Alleg#Arrest as well. YMMV. Xasodfuih (talk) 18:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
- Since copy edited to include excerpts in article as per tag and linked to main article about Alleg. Will transfer more specifically book-related stuff to L.Q. article. Julia Rossi (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 21:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Reference for the hook is a forum. Otherwise, history and length are good. Shubinator (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Done agree so I've deleted ref to forum and re-checked the two independent refs to specialist web sites which are fully consistent with numerous other sources. Thanks Thruxton (talk) 06:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- The two new sources are fan sites, one of which needs some grammar fixing of its own in the referenced article. I'm on the fence about this but, perhaps, if a book source could be provided or some other independent sourcing? There must be a dozen books about the making of this classic film. - Dravecky (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- The link to Thunderball (film) should be italicised. SpencerT♦C 17:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thruxton, how about taking a look at Death Rays, Jet Packs, Stunts & Supercars by Barry R. Parker? Jappalang (talk) 17:24, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles created/expanded on January 13
Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is a new article from the 13th based on a Finnish language article so while dates can be skirted a bit under IAR, I can't determine how much of this article is "new" content vs how much is in the original Finnish. Also, while the whole article is nominated, the link goes to a specific section of the larger article... and neither the section nor the article have any part of their name in common with the title of the link. Further, while I can accept the Finnish languages in good faith, there is no reference cited directly on the hook fact sentence and I can't read Finnish to tell which of the four sources cited at the end of the paragraph might support this contention. - Dravecky (talk) 05:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, and not to pile on too much, but this article needs a good grammar cleanup by a native English speaker before this can be promoted. - Dravecky (talk) 06:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- OK, thanks for your feedback. At least 80% of the article is new. My purpose was to nominate only the section of the article, but I didn't find any information on how to do it. About the references: [4] is the main source, it is about the whole incident. Searching for word "ajoissa" (as in the campaign name) gives hits in four of the sources. I cannot provide you source in English language because Google seems to give only Finnish and Swedish sources. [5] is Finland's national broadcasting company talking about the accident and the campaign. [6] are the blueprints of the underpassage [7] has title: "Pysähdy ajoissa -kampanja palkittiin" == campaign was awarded. [8] talks about the sponsors of the campaign.
- About grammar cleanup, I tried to find a template to request proofreading by a native English speaker but failed to find a template. Does such a template exist? If does, can you please link it for me?
- Thank you very much for taking your time to read the section of the article.--Siipikarja ♫ 11:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- Someone is bound to trip over this one all the important words in this hook start with ho-. Hostel, hotel, hospital. Using those in quick succession with the word hosts makes it a tongue twister. Perhaps an alternative phrasing that gives the same fact would be better. - Mgm|(talk) 22:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
- I thought it was deliberate. Anyways, where's the hostel? A letter 's' is missing from the hook? --74.14.23.25 (talk) 17:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I like the wording, but I'm unsure about the first reference in the article, which is used many times. Can someone else please take a look at it? Not sure if it's reliable. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 18:52, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- A lot of places are listed on the National Register, well over 80,000. That fact alone isn't unusual or interesting. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
See also
- User:AlexNewArtBot/GoodSearchResult – This is an automated list of promising new articles generated by AlexNewArtBot (talk · contribs · logs).