Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted. Articles deleted via proposed deletion and pages deleted under certain speedy deletion criteria, such as G6, can be restored through this process. This page also serves as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion, and you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here. To request the undeletion of images, you may also tag the file page with {{ImageUndeleteRequest}}.

float

float

Enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

David Barnes (rugby union)

• David Barnes (rugby union) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Possibly more of a history merge, as the initial article dates back to 2008, whilst the current article is only a year old -Londo 06 03:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Under this title I cannot see any deleted revisons. Rather it seems that it has been created by you as stub two years ago.[1] and has never been deleted but only been moved. So unless the story is more complicated, there does not seem to be a need to a history merge. Maybe the confusion arises from a major rewrite prepared by User:Slater582 in his sandbox? --Tikiwont (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Cam Folker

• Cam Folker · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I wish for this article to be undeleted because I added it because this person was not only interesting but famous with no information about him, it showed the article was deleted because of A7. I did not know it was published because I was await review, but the article is more than valid. Check the reference page and how many fans both nationally and internationally. He hasn't been on facebook for very long but has a ton of fans and a lot of buzz around utah, he's been on several radio stations and knows a lot of famous people to boot. Please reconsider the submission, what I stated was short and factful without copying what was put on facebook. This is not opinion. Check his name on search engines. Thank you for your time. -97.117.99.51 (talk) 06:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:FootsieWootsie/Cam Folker. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Kubigula (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 11:28, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

"Uluslararası Polis Eğitim Merkezi (UPEM)"

• "Uluslararası Polis Eğitim Merkezi (UPEM)" · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article was deleted because of article 8. I would like to fix it and resubmit. thanks. -Simurg16 (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

 Question: There has never been an article with that title. Can you give the exact title of the article you mean? JohnCD (talk) 13:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Phantom (operating system)

• Phantom (operating system) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Dmitry Zavalishin recently released the very first source codes of the OS, so it's no longer waporware. http://code.google.com/p/phantomuserland/downloads/list all the new information will be added as soon as the page's original text will be restored. sorry for using RfU, but I dont have 10 edits, so cannot white directly th the admin who deleted it ( User:NawlinWiki )-Nonsens (talk) 13:07, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phantom (operating system). If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 13:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

The Avillion Holiday Apartments Complex (Apart-Hotel)

• The Avillion Holiday Apartments Complex (Apart-Hotel) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The submitter is the creator of the text so there fore owns the copyright and also submitted the conflicting text on domegos.co.uk -K.savva.developers (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - article was a blatant advertisement. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising hoarding. Author blocked as spam username ( = Kleanthis Savva Developers of Cyprus). JohnCD (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Paolo Iovannone

• Paolo Iovannone · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Paolo Iovannone is a canadian songwriter/producer from Montreal working under different names and groups. He is the recipient of a Juno Award for the recording project Capital Sound. (Best Dance Recording - 1995) Paolo has also received a Certificate Of Achievement Award for Songwriting by Billboard Magazine. (More Than Friends - 1990)

The main reason the page was deleted based on the feedback was unverifired claims and orphaned links and was then referred to link to allmusic.com so here's a link to allmusic.com

http://allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&sql=11:dvfoxztgldfe

There are other links available and once page is up, we have no problem with editing info to meet Wikipedia's standards and edit the text to meet those as well. Blueskinge (talk) 13:47, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done I have restored the article. What you need to do is sort out the references: two that I sampled do not seem to mention him, and the "Juno Archives" one didn't work when I tried it. The article asserts that he has won a Juno award and has sold a million discs in Canada alone, but it has been annotated to say that those claims are not supported by the references given. You should either find reliable sources to confirm the claims, or remove them; and it would be best to remove references that do not actually mention the artist. The allmusic link you give doesn't say anything about him, much less confirm the claims in the article - it just gives a list of songs. JohnCD (talk) 16:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Kate Kennedy Club (second application)

(see also similar advice at first application further up this page.)

• Kate Kennedy Club · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This page was originally deleted as it required further citations or verification/ it did not meet 'general notability guidelines' and required further reliable secondary sources. This page, should, however, be restored as it is an accurate account of an exceptionally active and world renowned club which has an extensive history. The Kate Kennedy Club exists to preserve the Kate Kennedy Procession which dates back to the 15th century. This Procession remains a key feature of the calendar of both the town and University of St Andrews as a result of the Kate Kennedy Club. Furthermore, the club remains committed to its three aims, and is one of the most active clubs at the University of St Andrews. Finally, the Kate Kennedy Club is renowned as one of the most exclusive gentlemen's clubs in the world, and is referenced in numerous other Wikipedia articles, not to mention national press. Many more secondary sources can be added to the article to add to its credibility and further verify it. It is simply outrageous that such a notable and active club with such history should be removed from Wikipedia, and as such I hope it can be restored. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rdg22 (talk • contribs) 20:37, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Kennedy Club. If you believe that the discussion was not correctly closed in accordance with consensus, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to Deletion review. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Kate Kennedy Club (third application)

• Kate Kennedy Club · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This is an article that I would greatly like to see restored in the light of the significance of The Kate Kennedy Club and its activities. The Kate Kennedy Club is renowned as one of the most exclusive gentlemen's clubs in the world, and is referenced in several published books, many other Wikipedia articles, and many articles that have featured in national press. One only has to type the club's name into Google to see its significance in Scotland as a steward of one of the UK's greatest processions, its worldwide reputation as a gentlemen's club, and it's reputation as one of the most active student club's in St Andrews. The Kate Kennedy Club exists to preserve the Kate Kennedy Procession which dates back to the 15th century. This Procession remains a key feature of the calendar of both the town and University of St Andrews as a result of the Kate Kennedy Club. Furthermore, the club remains committed to its three aims, and is one of the most active clubs at the University of St Andrews. This is highlighted by the many events that the club organises for the benefit of the St Andrews student population including the two biggest balls in the country. Furthermore, the club is renowned as for its charitable works, giving away approximately £15,000 to charity every year, Finally, The Kate Kennedy Club is renowned as one of the most exclusive gentlemen's clubs in the world (according to wikipedia, among other sources!). Numerous other gentlemen's clubs and societies have articles devoted to them on Wikipedia - eg. the Pitt Club, The 16' Club, the The Strafford Club etc. I see this as a positive thing in the light of the interest they attract, but so many of these club's have considerably less history and are also considerably less active than The Kate Kennedy Club. All of this goes to show that The Kate Kennedy club is more than significant enough and attracts enough interest to merit its restoration on Wikipedia. Many more secondary sources can be added to the article to add to its credibility and further verify it, and I do hope that this can be done after its restoration. I look forward to discussing this issue further, and seeing the articles restoration soon. Below are just a few links to relevant articles: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] -Rdg22 (talk) 23:54, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

As stated twice before here and here, these are arguments suitable for Deletion Review. This page (Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion) only deals with noncontroversial requests, which this article (having been deleted by consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kate Kennedy Club) is not. — Korath (Talk) 01:31, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

VooDoo Blue

• VooDoo Blue · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Notable music group whose album Smile 'n' Nod and record company DCide both have articles. -67.159.73.84 (talk) 00:35, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 10:58, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Proactive policing

• Proactive policing · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article was nominated for deletion for having no content whatsoever. Then deleted for failing to meet unspecified minimum standards and also with a caution against original research. However all content (other than section headers) was referenced from reliable sources. -YouAndMeBabyAintNothingButCamels (talk) 06:25, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:YouAndMeBabyAintNothingButCamels/Proactive policing.. While there is some content here, it's not close to being ready to be a live article. I'd suggest getting an introduction and a broader world view as a minimum. When you think it's ready, get some feedback at WP:FEED. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:07, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Human design system

• Human design system · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

we need this page on wikipedia and it was deleted by just a couple of people, and they appear to be on sabbatical now ? -Mikemahalo (talk) 14:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

So I write something here? If I understand correctly, wikipedia exists precisely to allow collective neutrality on all topics, including controversial ones. The article was deleted for petty and wrong reasons, each of the reasons is uninformed. It may well be controversial when you put it back but not for the petty reasons in the deletion discussion, how absurd they are! the article can be improved to wiki standards, give it back to the public, there are others willing to assist now with this. The admins who deleted and attacked it appear to be on wiki leave and cannot be contacted easily, so new admins need to decide about all this. Mikemahalo (talk) 14:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

As I told you above and on my talk page, please take it to WP:DRV. Thanks! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Finally got the gist of WHY the original article was deleted, ok. I am working on a minimal new version here - User:Mikemahalo/Human Design

not quite sure what this page is here, if this is not requests for undeletion, then I got confused by something that led me here appearing to be a place to request undeletion. Never mind, step by step...

Mikemahalo (talk) 14:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Power of Omens

• Power of Omens · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The band Power of Omens satisfies several of the WP:MUSIC guidelines. I do not know why it was deleted. A quick Google search will reveal the band's prominent position among quite a number of online music encyclopedias and webzines, too many to catalog here, and is featured in a number of reviews. The google references are pages and pages deep, which is one indication of a band's popularity, influence and success. Power of Omens is notable for being on the original lineup of ProgPower USA, which has its own Wiki article. Power of Omens is notable as a highly original and influential band in the technical progressive metal style. -66.25.43.43 (talk) 19:33, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

 Not done There was no claim in the article that the band was at all important, let alone satisfied WP:MUSIC. (The entire article consisted of a list of members, a list of albums, and a link to a myspace page.) I'd suggest you register for a free account and write an article yourself. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Meghan Kabir

• Meghan Kabir · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I don't know what the previous articles said as I didn't create them. Meghan Kabir is a singer/songwriter and lead singer of the band Flashmob, which has recently signed a record deal with Warner Bros. She is thus a notable artist and many articles are available for references. Please allow this page to be edited. REFERENCES: [8] [9] [www.myspace.com/meghankabir] [www.myspace.com/weareflashmob] [10] [11] [12] [13] -Elephantmusic44 (talk) 23:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

If you're looking for a page to be unprotected, you need to request that at WP:RPP, not here. Just as some friendly advice, before making the request there, I'd suggest starting a draft at a subpage of your userpage, such as at User:Elephantmusic44/Meghan Kabir. That will give you plenty of time to get a quality article together (WP:FEED can help you with that), and show the folks at WP:RPP that you have something worth unprotecting the page for. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Belmont_Club

• Belmont_Club · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Inconsistent application of deletion criteria to articles about blogs -76.115.88.179 (talk) 08:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

PROD process did not invite input; the article can be made 'advertisement-free' if it is any worse than others of its kind; just needed notification of the perceived need -FChE (talk) 10:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 12:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Arbitrarily0. Let the record show also that the original nominating edit by Scythian77 (talk · contribs) appears to have violated the PROD process by using the unclear edit summary "Added tag"; yet this defect was evidently not regarded as disqualifying by deleting editor Nihiltres (talk · contribs). -AHMartin (talk) 14:29, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

• That doesn't even make any sense. Are you even familiar with how the various deletion processes on Wikipedia work? "Let the record show"...LOL. The Scythian 00:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

The process at the link says: "Nomination: ... 2. Provide an edit summary that clearly indicates that the article has been proposed for deletion. ...". Yet the entire text of your edit summary is "Added tag". -AHMartin (talk) 16:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I've added another tag. —Korath (Talk) 19:26, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

University of Houston School of Theatre & Dance

• UniversityofHoustonSchoolofTheatre&Dance · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

to edit and revise it so that it is more informative and to take out the unambiguous advertising -UHTheatreDance (talk) 20:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

 Not done Large portions, if not all of it, were also copyright violations. And even if permission were granted for use, it would still need a fundamental rewrite. In a nutshell, it's best for someone (not you -- see WP:COI) to start the article over from scratch.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

AdventureQuest Worlds

• AdventureQuest Worlds · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I was wondering if AdventureQuest Worlds can be undeleted. It is a good article with some cultural references and I was working on the Darkovia section at the time. I would be pleased if the article can be resurrected. Right now, it was merged with Artix Entertainment. Rtkat3 (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdventureQuest Worlds. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Marasmusine (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

"Vân Ánh Võ"

• "Vân Ánh Võ" · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It's short simple and reliable information about Vietnamese zither's artist . I will find more reliable source to provide but it needs more time.-Jackprt (talk) 02:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

"Vân Ánh Võ" is not currently deleted. It merely has a notice that unreferenced biographies of living people may be deleted. Add your sources within 10 days and you have no problem. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

University Union

• University Union · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Alumn contact purposes for Syracuse University... I dont know if it was deleted I cant find it anywhere -149.119.206.241 (talk) 04:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - article currently exists at University Union. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

O2Jam

• O2Jam · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

~7 related pages link to it (see links^^). — Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 18:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC) - — Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 18:29, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:55, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Ancient Empires Elysium by Demon

• Ancient Empires Elysium (mod for Rome: Total War - computer strategy game which has many fans on the whole world) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I'm an author of product described by Demon. Demon is author of first article on Ancient Empires Elysium. I'm (Limes maximus) a Wikipedia beginner who wanted to start editing article with more actual info. I requested deletion previously deleted article by Demon. Instead of asking for undeletion Demon's article I decided to create my own. It was mistake :). Thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Limes maximus (talk • contribs) -Wnt (talk) 15:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

You're already talking to the deleting admin about it, so there's not much for us to do here.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Mdantsane Breathing

{{subst:refund|Mdantsane Breathing |This voliume is an excellent attempt to present the features of township life in the Eastern Cape, the poorest province of the new South Africa. I worked for many years in the same hospital as Dr Mitra and can vouch for his beracity and committment. I belive his work will be remembered as a testament of the evils of the apartheid system.} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.210.164.29 (talk • contribs)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mdantsane Breathing. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user JForget (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:02, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

USOSCE

• USOSCE · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I was still working on the USOSCE page, like to retrieve my data, my page was possibly deleted cause I am a new user to Wikipedia. I need to become an Administrator. -VeroniGaby (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

As you can see by the blue link above, the page is not deleted. You started two different pages on the same subject (which we don't do here at Wikipedia), so one page was redirected to another. Wikipedia:Redirect might be a useful read. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Lil Freak Video.JPG

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Siquisloco (talk) 01:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Lil Freak Video.JPG is not currently deleted, but it will be if you don't address the concerns about its use. The template on the file's page has instructions that should help you -- if you need more help, put a {{helpme}} template (with the curly brackets) on your talk page, and someone will be along to help sooner or later. Cheers! --Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:10, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Opera Multi Steel

• Opera Multi Steel · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page was a description (with discography) of the french band Opera Multi Steel, which is still active; no reason for the deletion. -MCarr (talk) 01:35, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:MCarr/Opera Multi Steel. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact JzG (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

sean needham

• Sean Needham · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Numerous references and relevant credits have been added and updated -Imnotafan (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - since the userfication was the result of a consensus found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Needham, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user King of Hearts (talk · contribs), for his input. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:04, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

infant potty training method

• Infant potty training method · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

There was no discussion about proposed deletion or other warning about possible deletion, so no one had a chance to present counter-arguments about possible deletion. Moreover, the page is mainly about a book and its contents. Just because the book is about a topic discussed on another Wiki page does not mean the book page should have been deleted. There are many book pages on Wikipedia and there is no reason to remove this particular one. Thirdly, if there are objections to the text, the page needs to be reinstated in order to allow people to edit it. Finally, if there is a problem with the title of the page (infant potty training method), I first attempted to give it the actual title of the book which is "Infant Potty Training" but this title kept getting redirected to the "toilet training" page so it was not possible to create a page for the actual book title. If this would satisfy a Wikipedia requirement and if someone can make it possible to direct "infant potty training" to the book page, please advise how this can be done. -Thirdsecond (talk) 15:37, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

The page isn't deleted, it has just been boldly redirected. You can undo the most recent edit in the spirit of WP:BRD. –xeno^talk 16:24, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick reply. Could you please explain what you mean by undoing the most recent edit? Does this mean that the original page will reappear? I'd like to start editing my page so as to show that it's about a book and should therefore not be included in another article that discusses the same subject, but not the book. --Thirdsecond (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes, if you were to undo the edit, the previous version of the page would appear. Based on what you say, it sounds like you might want to create the article (on the book) at Infant Potty Training (book). Hope this helps, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Sam Schmidt Paralysis Foundation (logo)

• Sam Schmidt Paralysis Foundation · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Wikipedia has been sent a formal email, using Wikipedia's exact terminology, to authorize the inclusion of the foundation's logo in this article. This will be the last step to publication, so it's important! -Kaykohlman (talk) 16:53, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - once your userspace draft, User:Kaykohlman/Sam Schmidt Paralysis Foundation, is moved to the article space, the file, , may be restored. Please feel free to request at that time, and let me know if you have any questions. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

IslamTube

• IslamTube · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Some admins have deleted the page islamtube because it is not significance but it is significance and the reason for this is becase there is NO other like it because it allows users to share videos, audios and images and it is The Worlds first SUNNI sharing site/organization and there is no other sunni site that conatins video,audio,image content and this is related to Ummah channel as it has their tv programs on it as the owners of islamtube work for sky channel 828 ummah channel and terfore put the programes on islamtube for the sunni's and if it is not significance pls provide link to a sunni video sharing site that offers videos,audios and images and they have to be sunni muslims not wahabi http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabi here is the wiki link to sunni http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunni_Islam so pls leave this up and please don't delete it as it the only one of its kind and sunni don't have any other option. the only reason it was kept on being re submitted was because i thought it was still at the point of me explaining the reason for not deleateing it i didn't realise that it was already deleted and herfore when i saved the page it re submitted it so it was a mistake and anyways it is has even more content and many good sources so pls help me and let me create the page one more time and this time i will make it so it is perfect i promise pls understand it is my first time and i am not a expert respect to our reply -89.242.30.95 (talk) 23:48, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Actually, it was deleted as unambiguous advertising or promotion that would require a major rewrite to become encyclopedic. If you would like to do that work, please register for a free account and let us know here, and we can move it to a subpage of your user page, where you can work on it.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:54, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Kaipayil

• Joseph Kaipayil · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

deletion user error -Ctbandon (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Sorry; you never saved any such article - this request is the only edit to Wikipedia you've ever made. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:35, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Other articles by that name have been repeatedly deleted and recreated by other editors, without any evidence ever being produced that the subject was notable in any way; thus, additional recreations have been blocked. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Fryrender

• Fryrender · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Other articles like Maxwell_Render, Indigo_Renderer, Vray, Mental_ray and Kerkythea would have the same problems of violating wikipedia article rules as the article Fryrender, if there is actually a violation. If the other articles about specific render software products are not deleted as well very soon, the consequence must be that the article Fryrender is recovered! Please also see the user talk of GrahamColm and the history and discussions of the article Fryrender. -195.14.217.140 (talk) 15:42, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Render engines should have a place in Wikipedia, CG has become an important thing, there's nearly no Hollywood Movie or Television Ad without CG = without use of a Render Engine. -- Kausalitaet (talk) 19:45, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the page was deleted because it was "unambiguous advertising or promotion". However, you are welcome to recreate the page yourself, but remember to include references that help establish a neutral point of view. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:27, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, if the Fryrender article is not undeleted, the other articles I mentioned above need to be checked and most probably deleted as well! Everything else would totally be injustice and a shame on the whole wikipedia imho. By the way, I myself included one neutral reference in the Fryrender article as a start, before it was deleted. --Morphosto (talk) 20:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I made the Article which was deleted. In the Comments I wrote, it's "to make a start". My Article was neutral and did nothing else than explain what fryrender is and a list of features. I don't understand how this can be taken as Promotion/Advertising. Nothing else than - for example - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtualdub or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CINEMA_4D.

I understand if an Article needs improvement, but if it's just deleted, there's no chance for working on it. -- Kausalitaet (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately, according to Wikipedia policy, "blatant examples of advertising masquerading as articles can be speedily deleted", and this is what the article was designated as. Again, you are more than welcome to recreate the article with this in mind. If you believe there are other articles which violate this policy, I encourage you to pursue their deletion as well. Let me know if you have any questions, happy to help, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 22:01, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Team Starkid

• Team Starkid · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

It was deleted because it was not notable and the sources were unreliable. Their soundtrack clocked in at No. 11 on the national Billboard charts and this was supported by a report from the official Billboard website asserting that it was the first student musical to ever make the charts and might play at the New York Fringe Festival. Their A Very Potter Musical has generated talk and legal issues, backed up by statements from professors of law. Several of the sources were official interviews with Team Starkid but, being in podcast format, might have been considered unreliable. Other sources could be found to replace these, sources that would be more acceptable.
On a side note, A Very Potter Musical is as big as (if not bigger) than Potter Puppet Pals, which enjoys a spotlight on Neil Cicierega's page. (Yes, I do realize this is a faulty analogy.) And although Neil Cicierega's page is much more official and professional-looking, it has had contributors working on it since 2004.
I created a page for the creative team, because (popular as it is) A Very Potter Musical does not fulfill the Wikipedia criteria for notability, but the creative team is notable. Respectfully, Overduejustice (talk) 19:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Overduejustice/Team Starkid. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact NawlinWiki (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:22, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Ron da Silva

• Ron da Silva · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

updating article -Ron da Silva (talk) 02:09, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

• It was a single sentence and you have an obvious conflict of interest (as did the original author, which was clearly you with a different username). I suggest that instead you create a user page. Guy (Help!) 07:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - you are welcome to recreate the article, but as JzG mentioned above, the only content was "Ron da Silva (born September 18, 1971 Toms River, New Jersey, United States) is the Senior Director of Network Engineering, Architecture & Technology at Time Warner Cable." Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

HOODYWOOD RECORDS

• Hoodywood Records · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

we don't know why the article was deleted nor have we been told why? We did not receive an email, or phone call (Nothing!) The Wikipedia article is a true and accurate account of how my company "Hoodywood Records was started and has been posted for years and we would appreciate if it is restored to its original form.(we have an opinion as to why it was removed and it is as follows) we believe our article was removed maliciously because of the efforts of Mrs Marian Franklin of the "Shaka Franklin Foundation" she was very upset with this article because I Antheiaus Conquest when I was being interviewed about my company gave a true and accurate account of my experience with the "Shaka Franklin Foundation" information which she (Marian Franklin) found objectionable. After discovering that this information made it into the Wikipedia article she was quite upset and has made several demands of me to have it removed and or edited or censured and I have refused. Now, (correct us if we are wrong)but if the Hoodywood Records Wikipedia article was removed as a result of this angry woman's and her Shaka Franklin Foundations efforts and objections, this totally violates and contradicts your policy on neutrality... right? If you need any corroborating documents regarding our company and its history please contact or call we are willing to send you what ever you need including the heated email exchange between Marian Franklin and Myself etc.

Please restore our Wikipedia article -DORIANQUEST 15:25, 4 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorianquest (talk • contribs)

 Not done - I deleted the page because of a consensus to do so was found at the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoodywood Records. If you have any questions about this, please contact me on my user talk page. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Kegang Wu

• Kegang Wu · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am the author of the origional page on www.liverpoolconservatives.org therefore the owner of the copyright. Also, I have today created a new page of Kegang Wu but it disappeared without trace -Liverpool Riverside (talk) 20:14, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - please start by following the instructions for copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia, then re-requesting here. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:22, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Andy Crofts

• Andy Crofts · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Mrrooftop (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the article has not been deleted, but is under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Crofts. Feel free to discuss the article's deletion there, cheers! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Brainbread

• BrainBread · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 | afd3 ) · [revisions]

See 2nd nomination, all the arguments are there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/BrainBread_(2nd_nomination)

The old page was informative and described the mod pretty well, I don't see the reason for the deletion. The mod had a lot of players in the past and was most probably an influence for "Left 4 Dead" (the devs were apparently contacted by valve).

ModDB entry with good rating:
http://www.moddb.com/mods/brainbread

Official Valve entries:
http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Brain_Bread

http://store.steampowered.com/app/90006

Developer page:
http://www.ironoak.ch/BB/index.php -89.236.166.222 (talk) 22:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BrainBread (3rd nomination). If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

File:P Georgi.jpg

• File:P Georgi.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I don't see why it should be removed from its article -King of smart alecks 02:30, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - there are not currently any articles that use this file. Feel free to re-request if this file becomes in use in the article space. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Mississauga News frontpage.jpg

• File:Mississauga News frontpage.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Hockeychris66 (talk) 23:27, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the file was deleted because it was a non-free image not used in the article space. Please feel free to re-request if an article begins using this file. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 23:39, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

HOODYWOOD RECORDS

• HOODYWOOD RECORDS · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

We have done what we are suppose to do I really don't understand why our page keeps getting removed what are we doing wrong? -DORIANQUEST 02:39, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done First time around the article was a duplicate of Interscope Records. Second time it was deleted due to no claim of importance. You wrote "Hoodywood Records has only released promotional and teaser material" this gives a clue that it has sold nothing and has made no money, and has signed no notable artists. Do you want the page userfied? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Eleanor Bradley

• Eleanor Bradley · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please userfy. I'm building a list of Playmates. Since being a Playmate is no longer a reason to keep an article per WP:PORNSTAR, many articles were deleted. Do I have to go through this lengthy explanation at least a dozen times more or can I just ask that the article be userfied? -Dismas|^(talk) 03:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

• •  Done contested prod. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Audrey Daston

• Audrey Daston · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please userfy. I'm building a list of Playmates. Since being a Playmate is no longer a reason to keep an article per WP:PORNSTAR, many articles were deleted. Do I have to go through this lengthy explanation at least a dozen times more or can I just ask that the article be userfied? -Dismas|^(talk) 03:42, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done contested prod. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Nancy Crawford

• Nancy Crawford · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please userfy. I'm building a list of Playmates. Since being a Playmate is no longer a reason to keep an article per WP:PORNSTAR, many articles were deleted. Do I have to go through this lengthy explanation at least a dozen times more or can I just ask that the article be userfied? -Dismas|^(talk) 03:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done contested prod. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Cindy Fuller

• Cindy Fuller · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please userfy. I'm building a list of Playmates. Since being a Playmate is no longer a reason to keep an article per WP:PORNSTAR, many articles were deleted. Do I have to go through this lengthy explanation at least a dozen times more or can I just ask that the article be userfied? -Dismas|^(talk) 03:43, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done User:Dismas/Cindy Fuller restored, but you yourself requested deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Clayre Peters

• Clayre Peters · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please userfy. I'm building a list of Playmates. Since being a Playmate is no longer a reason to keep an article per WP:PORNSTAR, many articles were deleted. Do I have to go through this lengthy explanation at least a dozen times more or can I just ask that the article be userfied? -Dismas|^(talk) 03:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done User:Dismas/Clayre Peters restored, but you requested deletion yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Elaine Reynolds

• Elaine Reynolds · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please userfy. I'm building a list of Playmates. Since being a Playmate is no longer a reason to keep an article per WP:PORNSTAR, many articles were deleted. Do I have to go through this lengthy explanation at least a dozen times more or can I just ask that the article be userfied? -Dismas|^(talk) 03:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done contested prod. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

XpanD 3D

• XpanD 3D · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

subject is notable  -Filmteknik (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

• [[:]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | links | watch | afd | mfd ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Filmteknik (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia is improved by the existence of this article, which is about one type of 3D technology and is poorer for not having such an article. This is a technical area and it may not be possible to come up with the numbers of references in the popular media that some editors are insisting on having to prove notability. Further, even within this field (cinema technologies) there is not that much in the way of PRINTED media coverage. The fact is that most of the technical discussions about these things among technicians and users is actually taking place online (places like film-tech.com). How does one assert notability? That doesn't mean that this is such an obscure thing that it doesn't deserve an article. On the contrary, the person coming home from the cinema from seeing a 3D film and recalling the brand name on the glasses and is curious what it means ought to be able to come to Wikipedia and be able to find out.

3D in cinema is all the rage these days and there are a number of technologies which all work in completely different ways. Dolby 3D, Master Image 3D, RealD 3D, XpanD 3D, IMAX 3D all work in different ways. And within the last two weeks there is now also Technicolor 3D, yet another system working in yet another way. The fact that in each case a viewer is handed a pair of glasses doesn't mean they all work the same. I would think a person who is wondering what these terms mean ought to be able to consult his/her friendly Wikipedia and find an article with a brief explanation for each. Most of these others do have articles. This one should too.

I note Wikipedia has an article on "Disney Digital 3D" which isn't even a process at all but just a marketing name they stick on all their 3D movies which are then shown by ALL of the above mentioned systems (except Technicolor 3D...they have not signed up for that as of this writing). Kind of funny that an article about something that is just piece of marketing puff can stay but one about something that is real and in use in hundreds of cinemas should be pulled. And I'm not suggesting removal of Disney Digital 3D. People ought to be able to come here and look it up and see that it's just a name just like they should be able to look up XpanD 3D and learn how it works and why it doesn't need a silver screen when most of the others do and interesting things like that.

I have no vested interest; I do not work for any of these firms, hold stock in them, or profit in any way from their use.

 Done G4 deletion out of process as no discussion ever occurred. However it is still likely to be deleted due to lack of notability, so please add more text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I take it then that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XpanD (2nd nomination) was for different entity altogether? —Korath (Talk) 05:45, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

The article there was quite different, but entity still similar. The article is different enough to not qualify. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Super Mash Bros

• Super Mash Bros · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Restore to my user space. A7ed, but I think I could make it into a article that meets WP:V. -Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 07:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done userfied to User:Purplebackpack89/Super Mash Bros Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Inge Lynn Collins Bongo

• Inge Lynn Collins Bongo · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This article was improperly speedy-deleted under CSD#G10. That criterion is "biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced." But several reliable sources were provided in the text (see Google cache) and a U.S. Senate report) . -Wnt (talk) 15:21, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Note: the article should be relisted at AfD after undeletion, as discussion is still ongoing; I object only to the improper speedy deletion. Wnt (talk) 15:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - please discuss this with user Coren (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

HOODYWOOD RECORDS

• HOODYWOOD RECORDS · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

we need time to get the information you need to be compliant with Wikipedias criteria -67.190.175.213 (talk) 16:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Dorianquest/HOODYWOOD RECORDS. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact NawlinWiki (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:37, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Prisonburg

• Prisonburg · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I know that the recreated pages of Prisonburg were not improving, that does NOT mean that you can delete it! C'mon, there's lots of pages that aren't this proffessional like the oter ones, and the fact that no one has even heard of Prisonburg yet, but give it a chance! So please don't delete the pages that have not been completed, because I know that I can get even more information from the band. -METALHEADS101 (talk) 16:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:METALHEADS101/Prisonburg. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact MuZemike (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

San_Andreas_Multiplayer

• San_Andreas_Multiplayer · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 | afd3 ) · [revisions]

Deletion failed on 2 reviews, was then silently deleted later on a 3rd attempt once it was believed to be safe. In addition, the modification has reached even higher status in subsequent years after the delete. It also features on other language Wikipedias, eg http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Andreas_Multiplayer -f3llah1n ^(talk) 18:06, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Andreas Multiplayer (3rd nomination). If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user east718 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:31, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet

• The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

novel by noteworthy author: release date impending -Magicandmedicine (talk) 18:58, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 19:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Inge Lynn Collins Bongo 2

• Inge Lynn Collins Bongo · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Biography of the former spouse of an African president -Aengw (talk) 23:56, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

There's a couple of things I don't understand about the deletion, so I'll drop a note to the deleting admin and get more info.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:18, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

It was a BLP issue. The article consisted entirely of weakly supported derogatory allegations several of which were based on copies of primary sources hosted on scribd. There was a repost which didn't have this problem but which had no references whatsover. It seems that people looked into this and found that there were not sufficient third-party reliable sources to justify having an article at all. There would be nothing to source except the negative information, and that only to unreliable sources. That's my take, at least. Having any article at all is a BLP disaster waiting to happen. IMO it should be salted against any recreation. Yworo (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Venom vicious

• Venom vicious · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I want to have the article undeleted because I want to work on giving more notable information about the individual such as true information on the person. The article just needs to be reliable so that it can be legitimate for other people to see. The article was originally deleted because there was no significant information about the individual. -Afro55 (talk) 02:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Afro55/Venom vicious. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact NawlinWiki (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. —C.Fred (talk) 04:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Swissôtel Sydney

• Swissôtel Sydney · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Originally this page was deleted for reasons that it was an advertising page. This was a page that would serve the function of telling other people about the hotel and where it is. it only stated general information that i thought people would like to know about the hotel. please undelete this page, it does not serve the purpose of advetrtising in any means it is purley a reference for other people like me that want to know information about this hotel. thank you -68marketstreet (talk) 04:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I can't see the unambiguous advertising in the article, but G11 isn't something we unilaterally restore here. Your best bet is to drop a note to the deleting admin, Nick-D (talk · contribs), and ask for clarification and a possible restore. If you can't make any headway there, you can take it to deletion review, but make sure you talk to Nick-D first. HTH--Fabrictramp | talk to me 13:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

I've responded to this editor on my talk page declining this request on the grounds that the only reason they want to create the article is to promote it (their stated reason for wanting the article was "this page was built with no advertising intention at all, it was simply a page that told people like myself about the hotel and where it is and what it has to offer" - which is pretty much what an ad is). As their user name is also the hotel's street address (see here) the conflict of interest is pretty obvious and I've blocked them. Nick-D (talk) 09:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I've since received an email from 68marketstreet (talk · contribs) asking to be unblocked. Their email address leaves no doubt that this is a marketing exercise. Nick-D (talk) 11:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

silviu ionescu

• Silviu Ionescu · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

this is not an attacking, this is taking truth the evidences are already presented in Court -121.7.53.23 (talk) 14:14, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - please discuss the matter with user Frank (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page. Otherwise, you are welcome to recreate the article at any time. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 14:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Seattle Children's Theatre

• Seattle Children's Theatre · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I was removing the prod at the same time it was deleted and accidently recreated the page. This org seems to have alot of awards and a quick google search turns up major newspaper coverage. Really need to be an AFD rather than a prod. I figured Id let you guys know as I apparently blew out the edit history when I recreated the page.. so you can delete mine and restore the history. thanks -Tracer9999 (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - I deleted yours and then restored the lot so the complete history is now there for the AfD which I see has been opened. JohnCD (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

File:BirthCertificate_JamesMaximeDuPont.jpg

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -James Michael DuPont 17:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

This file was deleted to hastily. It was obviously older than 80 years. I received no email about the issue. on my talk page i explicitly ask people who want to delete things to please email me. there was no reason to delete it. Also, I do not check my wikipedia account every day, I did not log in for one month. Howcome I dont get any email that I have a message?

Please restore it. thank you,

James Michael DuPont 17:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

You can't expect people to email you. You were informed on your talk page. –xeno^talk 18:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done- I've restored the image, please provide the requisite source and licensing information. –xeno^talk 18:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

mypraize

• MyPraize · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

MyPraize is an established social network with over 140,000 members, and has been around for almost 5 full years. It's been on "The Today Show", and many other media sources. The legitimacy of the site is not questionable. All stats posted were current as of the date posted and verified by me, one of the site's administrators. -HolmesSPH 21:11, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

The article, as originally written, failed to demonstrate the site's notability. Please understand that notability and deletion rules aren't a judgement on the worthiness of the topic; they're a judgement on the quality of the article. A properly written and well-referenced article about the site might very well be kept, and the fact that one version of the article got canned doesn't mean the site can never have an article, either — it just means that this version of the article, as written, wasn't cutting it.

We're not obliged to keep or to undelete a poor-quality article just because one of the site's own administrators comes back after the fact to make unreferenced notability claims that were never in the original article in the first place. But you are always free to work on a new and better version of the article, which makes notability more immediately apparent, if you'd like.

Incidentally, the article was originally tagged for prod by User:NawlinWiki, not by me; I just deleted the article after the prod notice expired. Bearcat (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

vella & pratt

• Vella & Pratt · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Supports articles and news sources related to Richard R. Kennedy, in connection with multi-million dollar frauds in Ohio from 1994-2003. Richard R. Kennedy was indicted on multiple counts of fraud and conspiracy to commit fraud. Sentenced to 15 months in prison. -130.15.233.204 (talk) 02:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:Klaas91/Vella & Pratt. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact JohnCD (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Spurs Show

• The Spurs Show · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I understand if a separate page is not suitable, but I want to merge the page with the "Phil Cornwell" page (he is the star of the podcast). As other celebrities with podcasts (e.g. Ricky Gervais) have podcast sections on their pages, I don't think that this is an unreasonable request. -EzeeTiger81 (talk) 10:27, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Please undelete the "The Spurs Show" page so that I can copy the information it contained into the Phil Cornwell page

 Done - the page has been restored to your userspace at User:EzeeTiger81/The Spurs Show. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Stifle (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 18:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abjol_Miah

• Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abjol_Miah · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The biography is of current Respect Councillor Abjol Miah and Prospect MP Candidate for Bow and Bethnel Green. Lead Page is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bethnal_Green_%26_Bow_(UK_Parliament_constituency) -Jahmed2010 (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - this page has been deleted via a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abjol Miah. If you believe that the consensus of the discussion was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Nja247 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.. Regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 18:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Maria Tryti Vennerød

• Maria Tryti Vennerød · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reference inserted -Mtvnorway (talk) 15:20, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

There are still no sources anywhere in this article (the author's agent is not a reliable source). --Orange Mike | Talk 15:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nazi_concentration_camps, Jasenovac

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The concentration camp,Jasenovac has been deleted. My students are working on this and it was listed with all of the other camps as of 2 weeks ago. It also still appears in a separate article.please restore with the list of Concentration Camps-68.37.4.136 (talk) 18:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

It looks like the article you are looking for might be Jasenovac concentration camp. Let me know if it's not, cheers! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 18:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Dr S Mohanambal

• Dra. Mohanambal · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Because she is a doctor and it could help people -Saronwarrior (talk) 19:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

 Not done - the article was identified as "unambiguous advertising or promotion", and so cannot be restored. Feel free, however, to recreate a new version of the article at any time - and consider using the article wizard if you need help. Regards and good luck, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Aquarian Christine Church Universal, Inc.

• The Aquarian Christine Church Universal, Inc. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

because it is relevant & is linked to other related articles & pages/articles re: other organizations of lesser significance have not been deleted, so it would be unfair to our organization if ours was deleted. We still feel our page article was suggested for deletion out of religious PREJUDICE and not of any substancial argument for deletion. -Jwaqua (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The only article with a similar name that seems to have existed is Aquarian Christine Church Universal, Inc. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]. It doesn't seem to be linked to from other pages as stated. If there are other articles with similar problems, please point them out so they can be properly dealt with also. What leads you to accuse Nyttend (talk · contribs) of deleting it out of prejudice instead of his stated reason? —Korath (Talk) 19:46, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Maria Tryti Vennerød

• Maria Tryti Vennerød · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

new references inserted -Mtvnorway (talk) 00:26, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

The article has not yet been deleted, but is currently tagged for deletion. If you believe that the article has at least one reliable source, feel free to remove the tag. Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:30, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Jill Hellyer

• Jill_Hellyer · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

We have provided ISBN references to several books -Thea.gumbert (talk) 10:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Y The article has not been deleted, nor is it currently proposed for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 10:06, 8 April 2010 (UTC)