Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:33, 6 May 2014

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

G13. Abandoned Articles for creation submissions - see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.

Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70
71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80
81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110
111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120
121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130
131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140
141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150
151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160
161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170
171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180
181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190
191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200
201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210
211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220
221, 222, 223, 224, 225, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230
231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240
241, 242, 243, 244, 245, 246, 247, 248, 249, 250
251, 252, 253, 254, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 260
261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 270
271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280
281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290
291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300
301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310
311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320
321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330
331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340
341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349, 350
351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360
361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370
371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380
381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, 388, 389, 390
391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400
401, 402, 403

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Janan Sorelo Levy

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Janan Sorelo Levy · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 5.22.130.135, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 5.22.130.135 (talk) 08:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Janan Sorelo Levy

Janan Sorelo Levy · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I kindly ask an undeletion of this page thank you Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -5.22.130.135 (talk) 08:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

El Mednifico Journal

El Mednifico Journal · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... its just a company profile regarding something new in the field of science which is happening in a third world country like Pakistan. By deleting this page you will be hindering the progress of a nation. Kindly provide with the improvements to be made in order to undelete this page -Aw.usmani.duhs (talk) 11:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request.. Note however, notability is key, and if it's not encyclopedic YET, it more certainly does not "hinder the progress of a nation" - shame on you for suggesting such the panda ₯’ 13:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:MOHHANBABU

User:MOHHANBABU · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I want to delete an image from wikipedia commons and searched how to do it in google and found a code and as i am a fresher to wikipedia, i unknowingly kept that code in user edit page and found that my page was deleted.So I need your help in getting my page back and delete that particular image deleted from commons.Thank you. -MOHHANBABU (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Having read the contents of the deleted page, I'm not sure exactly what "code" you're looking for. Much of that page was wholly unacceptable as a userpage. Please be more specific about what elements from that page you need - nothing on that page had anything to do with Wikimedia Commons (and the English Wikipedia has no jurisdiction there) the panda ₯’ 13:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is my page not under rules of wikipedia? Can you give me more clarity about what is the mistake of me having my page in that way and Can you please say whether you could bring back that page or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MOHHANBABU (talk • contribs) 14:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done We allow wide latitude to what Wikipedia editors can do with their user pages, but so far you have very few contributions to the encyclopedia other than writing extensively about yourself. I also have concerns about the large number of family names you added to the infobox, because I'm fairly sure you didn't ask all of them if you could publicize their identities on a website. I can send you the deleted text via email if you wish, but you will have to re-create your user page as per our guidelines. Please pay close attention to the What may I not have in my user pages? section. WP:NOTSOCIALNETWORK is also applicable here. Finally, I deleted your request for deletion (the MfD you created) since that was the wrong venue to request undeletion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

magician ganesh

Magician Ganesh · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Darvesh.dinesh (talk) 13:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Dougweller (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:08, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Diller Street Journal

Diller Street Journal · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This organization exists as the newspaper of the North Shore Country Day School. As it is still reorganizing itself, information is low right now, but as the process moves along, more will be added. -Dallascowboysftw (talk) 14:24, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Wikipedia is not here to advertise your paper, and notability isn't inheritable. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:46, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Mendes

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Michael Mendes · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 24.18.92.82 (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:39, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Please read WP:COI and WP:AUTO, if it applies to you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:10, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arahmaiani

Arahmaiani · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Recreating article and want to see/edit this old version. -gobonobo ⁺ ^c 20:41, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done If you're going to re-create it go ahead, the extent of the content was Arahmaiani was born in 1961 in Bandung, Indonesia is also known as "Iani" or "Yani". A graduate of Bandung Institute of Technology and internationally active installation and performance artist. in two revisions. That's it. Make sure you review WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO before too. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pawanwagle

User:Pawanwagle · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Pawanwagle (talk) 01:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion U5. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a social networking site, and users who intend to use Wikipedia solely for this purpose are generally blocked as not being here to work on an encyclopedia. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I could tell you that I would restore it if you somehow proved that you are here to contribute to the encyclopedia, but in any case it was a single paragraph that could have been lifted from your CV. I'm sure once you become a regular contributor you'll want to populate your userpage with more appropriate stuff. Please read the links Jeremy provided above - Wikipedia accounts are not personal web pages. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Falaco Soliton

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Falaco Soliton · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Aqm2241, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aqm2241 (talk) 04:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/isoglobotriosylceramide

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/isoglobotriosylceramide · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 143.111.84.118 (talk) 04:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page is not for reviewing draft articles; it's only for undeleting certain types of articles that were deleted without discussion. Try WP:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Nothing to do here, the article has not been deleted and is awaiting review. I did add a references section. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:24, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parfums de Marly

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Parfums de Marly · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Kovinmel, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kovinmel (talk) 08:23, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{subst:Refund/

G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for

creation/Nicolas Mouawad}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avram44 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I notice that the page has been previously deleted for copyright violations, so I'll need to check to see if the second copy of the page also contained copyright violations. If it did, then I will not be able to un-delete the page for you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:34, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not done and will not be done Unfortunately the page is copyvio from the official website and this makes up the majority of the page. I can't really bring the page back because of this, but you can still create a new entry at this location. Please be aware that we cannot accept WP:COPYVIO for various reasons, one being that it is legally copyrighted to the manufacturer but also because in most cases such as this one, the copyvio is so promotional that it cannot be used in the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:37, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jaime Chavez

Jaime Chavez · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Prodded article, has been starting this season for Atlanta Silverbacks, for example [1] -Nfitz (talk) 12:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC) Nfitz (talk) 12:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:38, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crankin Frank

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crankin Frank · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Fviacono (talk) 14:19, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I'm going to act as a AFC reviewer here and decline the submission (for the third time) because the subject of the article clearly does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion. Narratives about how someone won tickets to a concert or has blogged about music is not significant coverage. Also please read WP:AUTO if it applies here to you. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shantanu maheshwari

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shantanu Maheshwari · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 182.68.58.47 (talk) 15:15, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:39, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:21, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List Of Promotional Yu-Gi-Oh! trading cards

List of promotional Yu-Gi-Oh! trading cards · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

As With My List of Yu-Gi-Oh! Cards in my userspace, I Would Like This Article to be in User:titusfox/LOPYGOTC. -Titus Fox^'Tribs 19:01, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. You misspelt "cards". —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done It's been transferred to your userspace by User:Graeme Bartlett. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 21:48, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had to delete the place holder, but I am sure no one will miss it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Procreate

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Procreate · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, CastleGreyskull, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CastleGreyskull (talk) 01:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Both the contents of the page and the history of your account suggest that the purpose of the page is to promote its subject, which is inconsistent with Wikipedia's policies. Also, there is no indication that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. We normally allow a good deal more leeway in an "articles for creation" submission than in other pages, to allow a chance to improve the draft, but when after more than a year no improvement has been made, there is no good reason for allowing Wikipedia to continue to be used as a web host for a page which is unsuitable as an article, especially when the history of the account that created it strongly suggests that the purpose of the account is to use Wikipedia for promotion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neptune Society

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neptune Society · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Pparkk, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pparkk (talk) 02:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The page was an unambiguous attempt to use Wikipedia for advertising, and as such could have been speedily deleted immediately after creation. We normally allow a good deal more leeway in "articles for creation" submissions than in other pages, but when an editor has had a few days short of a year in which to improve a draft, and in that time made no attempt whatever to re-write it as a non-promotional page, and when that editor's editing history also suggests that he/she is here for the purpose of promotion, enough is enough. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's a very harsh assessment under the circumstances, James. My goal was to differentiate a number of companies operating under the same name, Neptune Society, in the same industry. As my article included information about 4 companies named Neptune Society--all competitors--I'm having trouble seeing how my article was seen as promotional. I'm certainly not promoting all 4 competitors in the same article. I don't see why the fact that I have little time to devote to wikipedia contributions should count against me. Pparkk (talk)

Joseph Di Virgilio

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph Di Virgilio==

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joseph Di Virgilio · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Larrycohen745, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Larrycohen745 (talk) 05:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done This is one of a large number of attempts to use Wikipedia to host a somewhat promotional page about a person who does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. It has been repeatedly created under various titles, by a string of single-purpose accounts, very probably sockpuppets of a blocked editor. You have been attempting to use Wikipedia to host this page at least since 2007, and you have repeatedly had it made clear to you that the page is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please drop the attempt. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 08:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mehgan James

Mehgan James · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

It says that the Mehgan James page was deleted because there is reason to believe that she is not a real person. Mehgan James is indeed a real person who's has been on 4 reality tv shows and 2 national commercials. she has a real fan base . this is not fair to her fans. who would like to know and learn information about her -50.200.126.4 (talk) 08:28, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. That is not what an A7 speedy deletion implies, it implies that the article does not make a credible claim as to why the person is notable. Existence does not play a factor into it, and having a fanbase does not make one automatically notable. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:46, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mehgan James, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:23, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thelakkat Kalathilthodiyil Kesavan Nayar

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Thelakkat Kalathilthodiyil Kesavan Nayar · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Ahsamkr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ahsamkr (talk) 14:11, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ahsamkr. The AfC submission for this article was declined on 27 October, 2013 for the reason: "This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia." Do you have a plan for how to fix this? Have you located any references that you could add to the article? EdJohnston (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. The article describes the subject as a 'practicing physician and a social personality.' EdJohnston (talk) 01:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Back to the Rock Live

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Back to the Rock Live · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Petrafan327, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Petrafan327 (talk) 14:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please go over the notability guidelines for musical recordings before re-submitting. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:30, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Zeliangrong Community

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Zeliangrong Community · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 117.121.234.131, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.121.234.131 (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Before submitting, please correct: The submission is worded as an essay rather than in an encyclopedic tone, and is completely unsourced. Otherwise it will be rejected. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:33, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cork Proctor

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cork Proctor · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 190.154.52.243, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 190.154.52.243 (talk) 17:54, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HFSmas Nutcracker

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HFSmas Nutcracker · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Dvincent88, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dvincent88 (talk) 21:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What Was That or Suddenly Lost Summer

Suddenly Lost Summer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

My guess is that the page was deleted for lack of any relevant information or details about the event. However, a rare radio spot for it and a poster for it have been found, allowing the article to be populated with some hard information. It was sponsored by Radio Station KSAN on January 31-February 1, 1976, it was "an acid-drenched flashback to the summer of love, featuring remembrances of those turned on days when all things were possible and little was probable; complete with interviews, un-released music, and horrifying shocks of recongnition." It also featured eastern mysticism and the saying "Turn on, tune in, and drop out!" -50.136.141.191 (talk) 01:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. I can't see where a page by that name has ever existed on Wikipedia. I searched under various variations of the name and couldn't find anything. However the thing to remember is that a poster doesn't really show how this event was notable. You'd have to show where the event received coverage in secondary and reliable sources. Anything released by the radio station (a radio spot by them or a poster) will not show notability, nor will posters sold through merchants. If it was deleted, it was probably due to notability rather than anyone questioning that it did or didn't happen. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- There are articles called Suddenly, Last Summer (film) and Suddenly, Last Summer and Suddenly Last Summer (song) all exist, so perhaps one is what you want. Or KSAN (FM) could be a parent article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They're referring to an event held/sponsored by a radio station (see this poster) back in the 70s. I honestly have my doubts about its notability because there is little to nothing out there about it. No true mention in books, highbeam, or even basic hits beyond poster sales. The most I found was a picture of the poster here, but we can't use it as a RS because the event itself isn't mentioned and besides, it's one of those "anyone can edit" sort of sites. At most the event could be mentioned on the radio station's article, although I'd like to have some sort of certainty as to which KSAN it is since there are multiple KSANs and the station numbers don't exactly match up with the ones listed on the poster (95). I'm pretty sure that it's this one, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:35, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zopim

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zopim · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Abhiroopb (talk) 06:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it, but it will still need to be edited because there is a slight promotional tone to the article. I recommend asking for assistance at the business WikiProject. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:25, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Numeracy

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/National Numeracy · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 81.142.59.121 (talk) 07:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'd restored this, but the more I look at it, the more promotional it is in tone. This was just far, far too promotional to keep in AfC and unfortunately it would have to be completely re-written to remove all of the promotional prose and claims. Also, if you are the same person as User:EmmaNatNumeracy, I'd recommend that you look over WP:COI and change your username to something that doesn't represent you as part of a company. Promotional usernames are not allowed on Wikipedia and if you continue to edit under that name without requesting a name change, it can lead to a block per our username policy. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tokyogirl79: Actually, the WP:ISU part of Wikipedia:Username policy explicitly allows this type of username. Precedent was established, I recall, at User talk:Mark at Alcoa, involving several admins and a bureaucrat, with the bureaucrat selecting the name. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the name had to clearly and unambiguously identify the account for COI purposes - "John at Yoyodine" is fine, but "EmmaNatNumeracy" not so much. Unless it means "EmmaN at Numeracy"? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:31, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd taken it to be "Emma Nat Numeracy", which is what concerned me. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald R. Weeks

Gerald R. Weeks · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -131.216.14.2 (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC) Hi,[reply]

My page was restored to the old page after I corrected everything. It was set up by a colleague without asking me. I am not sure why the old page is now up and how to contact the person who changed it. Gerald R. Weeks131.216.14.2 (talk) 15:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)4/29/14[reply]

The page is not deleted, and hasn't been deleted, and isn't being proposed for deletion, so there is nothing to restore.

You have a conflict of interest regarding an article about yourself. Read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and refrain from making substantial content changes directly to the article. Propose your changes on the talk page instead. Preface your proposal with the {{request edit}} tag to signal other editors that you are proposing a change. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:46, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Claire Muzik

Claire Muzik · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Claire Muzik I don´t have an idea why the page was deleted. Can you please let me know what else should I do to keep the profile online. Thanks so much! Helloween82 (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Y (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.

Also, this isn't Facebook. We don't have "profiles" here. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:17, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shiju_jose

Shiju jose · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions] Please don't delete this page as its a self created page about me. i want world to know me also while searching on web. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eureka4u (talk • contribs) 17:40, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Wikipedia is not for telling the world about yourself. Next time, please follow the directions at the top of this page as opposed to linking to another wiki. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:21, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Wikipedia is not the place to write about yourself. Subjects must meet the notability guidelines for inclusion, and the reason the article was deleted makes it ineligible for restoration. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Siterank Targeting

Siterank Targeting · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hi, I've changed the the post removing any reference to a company name - explaining the key principle behind SiteRank targeting only; Think this is worth a place on wikipedia as this is an explanation to a unique targeting algorithm that is used by demand-side platform; Let me know if it is ok or not to mention AdGear as the company is the inventor of this targeting algorithm "Save page" button below -Hholod (talk) 20:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. It's already been deleted three times for being promotional, and that is disruptive, which is why the article cannot be recreated anymore. Please use Wikipedia:Articles for creation for stuff like this, especially when you have a conflict of interest. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:42 very carefully before you continue. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brenda Kerr

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Brenda Kerr · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Rugbyleagueorg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rugbyleagueorg (talk) 20:55, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christ Church, Selly Park

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christ Church, Selly Park · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Dskjt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dskjt (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:32, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Christ Church, Selly Park · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 172.5.213.158 (talk) 02:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). I can't see any deleted content from your IP, so you will have to tell us what it is. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hilda Harris

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Hilda Harris · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Ready to make recommended edits to have article ppublished -172.5.213.158 (talk) 02:06, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see where the page has been deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:58, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Krisana lalai

Krisana lalai · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

-Toey ok (talk) 10:17, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. There is no benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring an article that appears to exist solely to promote the subject. Consider asking the deleting administrator RHaworth to restore or userfy the article. If you are associated with the subject in some way, try Wikipedia:Articles for creation as an alternative way to submit an article. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, consider undeleting AdGear article

AdGear · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please, consider reviving AdGear article - twice I have worked on this article about AdGear company and both times it was removed - It is quite a bit of work and will do my best to gather both information and relevant sources about the organization. Company is quite unique in its own space of ad technology platforms - for example they are the inventors of unique SiteRank based targeting algorithms for demand-side platforms... That being said I strongly believe they deserve a spot within wikipedia universe. Thank you, Ivan Roubtsov " button below -Hholod (talk) 12:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 do not qualify for restoration by request. You already have Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AdGear, as clearly explained on your talk page. Work on that version and submit it. Do not try to circumvent the AFC process that you yourself started by trying to post the article in main space. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yotta Solutions

Yotta Solutions · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Yotta Solutions article shouldn't be deleted. It was talking about an online company for websites producing which also offers internet services and programming. How isn't that important? I believe it's un-fairly deleted. Please review it. -MoAtoum (talk) 15:03, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Absolutely not. It was properly deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 and thus does not qualify for restoration by request. This is your company, you have failed to read or understand WP:NOTPROMOTION and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest (and you clearly have one). You should be using WP:AFC to submit articles instead of trying to put them in main article space directly. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:15, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Grid-Enabled Measures

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Grid-Enabled Measures · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Kai.larsen, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kai.larsen (talk) 16:30, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maithili cinema

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maithili cinema · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Viraj Dobriyal (character)

Viraj Dobriyal (character) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Begging admins to please save the edit as this is not violating any rights. For admins, save the page -AiNaCholbe (talk) 18:02, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. Repeatedly creating a page will get all titles you've done it under salted to stop you from doing it. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viraj Dobriyal, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user FreeRangeFrog (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Noting to do with any rights, but deleted due to non-notability. When two independent reliable sources write on the topic it can be reconsidered. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the requester re-created the article under a different title to get around the G4 and has now been blocked for socking, it will be snowing in the Bahamas before we restore this article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:28, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chihiro number(s)

Chihiro number · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Mathematical content was legitimate, not present at any other location on the wiki, fairly notable, and named improperly -131.212.242.56 (talk) 02:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done The page was deleted per WP:CSD#G3 as a blatant hoax using fake references. See discussion at ANI and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#Input requested about possible hoax. EdJohnston (talk) 03:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:: this IP, like the ones involved in the hoax, is registered to the University of Minnesota. JohnCD (talk) 13:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Online Insurance comparison websites in India

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Online Insurance comparison websites in India · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Debam25, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Debam25 (talk) 13:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, page restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SoundPimp audio enhancer

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SoundPimp audio enhancer · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 80.202.169.16, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 80.202.169.16 (talk) 15:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, page restored. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:52, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scott Ramsey

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scott Ramsey · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, HICOR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HICOR (talk) 21:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There was no content the panda ₯’ 21:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St. Mary & St. George Parish

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St. Mary & St. George Parish · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

<malformed request fixed--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)>--Julio César Martin Trejo (talk) 22:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Julio. Can you please advise how much of this content (if any) is text taken from the sources you cited? After years of experience with reviewing new articles, this reads to me like content that is composed of quotations, though I don't know that for sure; did you rewrite the material you found in the sources in your own words? Please advise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dead mans cove runners

Dead Mans Cove Runners · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Thatusernametaken (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2014 (UTC) The page was deleted as I made a mistake in not preparing it in my sandbox first.[reply]

The Dead Mans Cove is about a group, not a formal club, of mostly men with the main purpose of fundraising and supporting charities. The charities include Oxfam, Kids Under Cover, Royal Children's Hospital ,Cottage By The Sea and RSPCA to name only a few. The group uses the DMC runners tag as a loose identifier of them rather than as their core business. With the charity organizations we support we register for events under the banner of DMC or Dead Mans Cover Runners but have no formal structure. If I could have the page back I will load it into the Sandbox and complete it rather than editing "live" and leaving an erroneous view of the group as a "sporting" club. The anonymity of the members in using nicknames is preserved. I was preparing the section on getting involved and supporting our charity partners when the page was taken down. in hind sight I should of completed the planning, and editing prior to publishing.

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies, organizations or groups. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies or groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. See also Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. JohnCD (talk) 09:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Art Spiegelman and my consistent removal from his page.

I would like to again ask that I be included in the article on Art Spiegelman, my friend and boyfriend from 1966-1996 or so. His most recent book, Co-Mix, shows, in his "Grain of Sand" comics, going down one of the "I's" in the title (may require a magnifying glass), "I love you, Ladybelle."

Please see my discussion with one of the editors on this matter. There are also many images of Art and myself on Facebook, on my page, some of which can be found by running a Google search for Art Spiegelman and Ladybelle Fiske.

He and I were very close and I was the closest thing he had to a wife till he met Françoise Mouly in 1975. He also did draw some of "MAUS" at Quarry Hill, my home in Vermont, in my little writing cabin in the mountains.

Many friends of ours would be able and willing to provide statements as to my importance to Art. I don't understand why it is so difficult to get my name mentioned. I helped Art and Françoise create "Top Drawer Rubber Stamp Company," and the images were made by friends of ours who lived at Quarry Hill. Laurence Mouly, Françoise's sister, lived with us in Vermont (it is Vermont's oldest commune-- see the Quarry Hill Creative Center page.

Quarry HIll and I were an important part of Art's life. I will soon publish a memoir of my life which mentions the relationship, though by no means is the book only about Art. I consider him a friend and an old lover, famous or not. I too am not unknown in my home state of Vermont. To me, he's just a friend I once knew, not God. Thanks, Ladybelle Fiske (Isabella Fiske McFarlin) Ladybelle Fiske (talk) 03:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The article has not been deleted, and this is a dispute over the content of the article. Wikipedia runs on reliable sources and WP:CONSENSUS. A person should never be directly editing an article where they have direct involvement. You may propose edits on the article talkpage, but ensure they are sourced to valid, reliable, third party sources - never personal knowledge. Through talkpage discussion, it will be determined if your proposals are accpted into the article or not the panda ₯’ 09:13, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also Talk:Art Spiegelman#Removed digressive material. Ladybelle Fiske, did you read the policy page you were referred to there regarding no original research? The issue is not that anyone has said they don't believe you or discounted your relationship. It's that Wikipedia only properly covers material that is the subject of, and verifiable in, reliable published sources, giving such information due weight in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in those published, reliable sources.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SbX Green Line

SbX Green Line · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The sbX Green Line needs a page separate from the page entitled San Bernardino Express because the Green Line is a specific route of an entire BRT system in development by Omnitrans. The information on the San Bernardino Express should be amended to be a more general overview of the system. Information about the lines and network and the differences are already included on the websites that are/were cited on both the (now deleted) Green Line page as well as the San Bernardino Express page. -Snoopyloopy (talk) 05:58, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The two articles are substantially identical, with the only major difference being in the lead of the deleted article. Essentially all of the content already contained within San Bernardino Express was included in the deleted article. Please consider expanding the existing article instead, creating subsections as necessary. Alternatively, the existing article can be renamed. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael G.Brown

Michael G.Brown · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I have references to verify please go to http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1042668/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 -Way2cute (talk) 07:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC) Way2cute (talk) 07:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Note that imsb is NOT an acceptable reference as it's user-created the panda ₯’ 08:36, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

O manasa preminchake

O manasa preminchake · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This is very good film , Director sivaji is wonder full director , Gundu hanumantha rao is very good camidian -106.220.114.157 (talk) 08:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O manasa preminchake, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. The question is not whether it is a good film, but whether it is notable to the standard of WP:Notability (films). JohnCD (talk) 09:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. It's still on the mainspace. The problem is that even if it is deleted via AfD, we still couldn't undelete it via this manner. You'd have to go through Wikipedia:Deletion review for that, although I'd prefer that you work on saving it now rather than after it's deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David W. Baird

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David W. Baird · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 23.242.185.200, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.242.185.200 (talk) 14:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 15:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oxford Hawks Hockey Club

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Oxford Hawks Hockey Club · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 91.85.216.76, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 91.85.216.76 (talk) 09:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This will be the final time it is restored. It was previously restored last year per a request, but nobody actually worked on it. Please understand that AfC is not a permanent webhost and when we restore it, we expect for there to be some work on it. It doesn't have to be lightening quick, but some actual progress on the submission must be done. If it is deleted a third time, then I would recommend that it not be restored again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anukriti Gusain

Anukriti Gusain · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Anukriti Gusain is participating in Miss Asia Pacific World 2014 and representing to India. I would like to request for review the afd, she is enough Notable to create page e.g. Miss India Delhi 2013 winner, Miss India 2013 -in Top 5, BOW India 2013 and Miss Asia Pacific World India 2014 -182.68.90.182 (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anukriti Gusain, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Lankiveil (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:27, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for appropriate advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.90.182 (talk) 11:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Connor Roberts

Connor Roberts · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Could you please restore the previous history prior to deletion as subject is now notable. Thanks! -JMHamo (talk) 15:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Done, as a contested PROD. Protonk (talk) 17:31, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hamidou Traoré

Hamidou Traoré · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Please restore the article history prior to it being deleted. Thanks! -JMHamo (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, JMHamo. Has the reasoning behind the AfD been vacated or is this article likely to be deleted again as a recreation of a previously deleted article? It's done regardless, but I'm curious. Protonk (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It passes WP:NFOOTBALL now as he's made his senior debut for the Malian national football team. The article needs tidying up still. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 18:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool beans. Thanks for the followup. Protonk (talk) 21:25, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruno Chikly

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bruno Chikly · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 86.193.226.39, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.193.226.39 (talk) 19:15, 3 May 2014 (UTC) I just need to see this page to redo it properly, I was not really aware of its deletion, sorry about this, my mistake.[reply]

I can't restore it (because it was deleted as a copyright violation of this link. Near as I can tell the deleted text was pretty close to that page, so working from that as a baseline is probably going to lead to close paraphrasing and additional copyvio issues down the road. If you really need the deleted text you can make an account and I can email it to you but you may be better off working from scratch. Protonk (talk) 21:30, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

High Spy Prog Band

Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hss1138 (talk) 21:17, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Not sure why it has been deleted?[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Check also WP:COI the panda ₯’ 21:28, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

o manasa preminchake

O manasa preminchake · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

In *my web cafe* many customers are very interesting to watch this film. It is one of the nice movie in Telugu language.....Raja (Web cafe owner -106.220.61.118 (talk) 02:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already answered, above. You are on the wrong page. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:39, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O manasa preminchake, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Salvidrim! (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop posting here. This board cannot and will not restore pages that have been deleted via an AfD. you must go through deletion review or the closing admin. There's no other option here and spamming this board with restore requests will not change anything and could run the risk of you being temporarily blocked as being disruptive. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Umesh Jakhar

Umesh Jakhar · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Umeshjakhar (talk) 04:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sangit Om (2)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sangit Om (2) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Lyraris, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lyraris (talk) 05:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FlexRAID

FlexRAID · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FlexRAID should be restored. FlexRAID is a technology used by thousands of users around the world. It promotes a technical approach that's worth documenting for the benefit of data protection. The page was deleted due to lack of its understanding and origin. Wikipedia is meant to educate and not enforce ignorance. Deleting a page that discusses of a technology with growing following is more of a sabotage rather than furthering any objective goal. Please restore the page for the thousands if not millions of users that can benefit from understanding the technology. The wiki page was created by this user who has no relation with the developers (search for FlexRAID on this page): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Smurf-IV/Toolset. You even have companies talking of the technologies on their sites: http://assassinhtpcblog.com/server-flexraid/. A Google search will reveal various independent discussions of the technology: https://www.google.com/#q=flexraid. Thanks. -Spectwiki (talk) 05:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:17, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FlexRAID, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Lankiveil (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please be aware that in order to re-create the page you must show how the company passes WP:CORP by way of coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS). Saying that something is popular (WP:ITSPOPULAR) or that it'd be useful (WP:USEFUL) are not good arguments to show notability. Only coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject can show notability. Now when it comes to why it was deleted in the first place, please assume good faith rather than making comments that insinuate that this was a deliberate sabotage. That will not help you when it comes to approaching people, as it puts people on the defensive and makes them less likely to want to help you. It's better to ask politely and to not say things that may sound disparaging. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hardik Malaviya

Hardik Malaviya · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

because this page is should not be deleted see on google -Hardik98248 (talk) 08:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardik Malaviya, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.. Besides, if you are Hardik, you should not be writing about yourself the panda ₯’ 09:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kang Jun-ho (born 1996)

User:Kang Jun-ho (born 1996) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

just now i join Wikipedia with my dreams to write about my mother -Kang Jun-ho (born 1996) (talk) 12:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I deleted the page, but the problem here is that you edited the page to seem too much like an article and a personal webpage. As far as editing about your mother goes, I would highly recommend that you get someone to help you out with that to ensure that you understand notability policies but also deal with issues of WP:COI. Since you have an obvious conflict of interest here, it would be very easy for you to see notability where there might not be any. I don't mean this to sound harsh, but people do not have automatic notability because they exist or have existed. We would have to see where she's received coverage in reliable sources. Now as far as userpages go, I always recommend that people look at pages such as User:Yunshui, as it's a great example of how people can be very creative and have some information about themselves, but still fall within normal guidelines. All userpages must pertain to how you edit on Wikipedia. Some personal information is fine, but the page should not be written as if it is an article in the mainspace. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:24, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Parkside Killers Australia

Parkside Killers · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

There is a resurgence in the interest of this ground breaking band. -124.168.28.169 (talk) 15:47, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, article restored because it was deleted as an expired WP:PROD. However, the article has now been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkside Killers because the band doesn't seem to meet any of the criteria in WP:BAND. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:46, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aboleth.JPG

File:Aboleth.JPG · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

For fair-use at List of Dungeons & Dragons creatures (A)#Aboleth. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that is a good use of the image as it would fail WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFLISTS in that article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. TLSuda, what you have stated works for me. Thanks for the information/direction regarding non-free image policies. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aarakocra.JPG

File:Aarakocra.JPG · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

For fair-use at List of Dungeons & Dragons creatures (A)#Aarakocra. Steel1943 (talk) 18:52, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same as above: I'm not sure that is a good use of the image as it would fail WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFLISTS in that article. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. TLSuda, what you have stated works for me. Thanks for the information/direction regarding non-free image policies. Steel1943 (talk) 19:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taymir

Taymir · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Unallowed link ( Youtube ) and I think I didn't write enough things about the importance of the band. Of course, I can erase unallowed links and explain why this band is important. I just wanted to create this page, since a Dutch page exists but most people understand English -Nina77zz (talk) 19:53, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Please note that the notability requirements on the English Wikipedia is much more stringent than on other projects the panda ₯’ 20:16, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kurt Gutenbrunner

Kurt Gutenbrunner · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I came across this article at AfC. I added cites to the first sentence to establish the subject's notability, but the article deleted after I moved it to mainspace because the rest of the article was a copyvio. Can an admin please peel off the first sentence with the cites I included (and images if there were any) and post the content to my talk page so I can start the article without having to wade through a Google search looking for the cites and formatting them etc. again? Thank you very much. Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:43, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done See your talk page. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mossèn Costa i Llobera Gardens

Mossèn Costa i Llobera Gardens · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I got an auto-deletion message about 2 seconds after saving the article. Obviously, the content is not the issue as it could not be checked after such a short amount of time. A copy-right infringement is impossible because the article is a translation of the German version on wikipedia that I wrote myself -Creichmann (talk) 22:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because there is nothing to do. No page has ever existed by that name, or by any name starting with "Mossèn" and it isn't in your deleted contribution history either. Perhaps you didn't actually save it? There have been times when I accidentally clicked "Preview" instead of save, and then leave without realizing that my changes weren't actually saved, so I am sure it happens to others. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alzo David-West

Alzo David-West · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I noticed this Wikipedia bio of a living person (social scientist) originally linked at The Cleanest Race page. Now, the living person bio has suddenly disappeared. David-West is a well-known social scientist in the North Korean studies field. If I recall correctly, the bio was on Wikipedia for seven years. -Morph93 (talk) 22:19, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Observation: The article didn't contain evidence that the subject was notable, and it was tagged as such for almost 8 years without improvement. It was deleted in accordance with WP:PROD, which, when tagged, allowed for at least a week for improvement to save it from deletion — but again, nothing was done. Now it's deleted, and suddenly its absence gets noticed? Will restoring it result in improvements, if none have been made in so many years? Will you make improvements if it is restored? ~Amatulić (talk) 03:24, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have to kind of second this statement as well. I'm just a little concerned over the lack of attention the article received and I'll be honest, there are a lot of articles that get restored that never get the promised attention. I'm not really finding a lot when I search for sources either, so I think I'd like to see some sort of evidence that he passes notability guidelines. The thing to remember is that being known isn't the same as being notable per our guidelines, which are admittedly fairly strict. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natalia Elerdashvili

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Natalia Elerdashvili · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Tbarabadze, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tbarabadze (talk) 04:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michael G. Brown

Michael G. Brown · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] reference for verification http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1042668/?ref_=fn_al_nm_1 Way2cute (talk) 05:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done because there is nothing to do. The article has never existed as anything but a redirect to Michael Glyn Brown which is not deleted, nor is it being considered for deletion. If you want to write an article about the actor, try WP:AFC to get started, or create an article like Michael G. Brown (actor). ~Amatulić (talk) 05:23, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Espoo Adult Education Centre

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Espoo Adult Education Centre · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Spalemane (talk) 06:06, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, there are some issues with tone. It's not so promotional that I wouldn't restore it, but there are some phrases that come across as slightly promotional and will need to be cleaned up before submission to AfC again. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

smart wiki

Smart wiki · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 117.211.106.178, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.211.106.178 (talk) 06:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I looked at the article history and there isn't really anything to restore. It looks like someone created a page with a link to an outside website and that was about it. There's nothing there to restore that would even be remotely helpful to building a new entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:39, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Share2B

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Share2B · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 46.252.128.98, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 46.252.128.98 (talk) 07:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done There wasn't much content to restore and aside from the page being abandoned, the entry also has some big issues with promotional tone. You'd have to re-write the article from scratch and since the deleted history is comprised of four sentences with no sourcing, there is not really any point to restoring it. It would be better to start on a new entry entirely. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sollentuna Volleybollklubb

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sollentuna Volleybollklubb · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 193.15.240.60, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 193.15.240.60 (talk) 09:02, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Douglas Nelson Turner

User:Douglas Nelson Turner · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

In RHaworth talk I see that the deletion was "uncontroversial". There was some redirect involved about my article for creation (Rotating Armature Alternator), that I had no part in.

I was using my page as a sandbox because I had read that actual sandboxes were automatically cleaned out after three days. I did not want to submit my article while I cleaned it. I was looking for a way to protect it while it was under construction.

Someone said my article was "patently" not ready for acceptance. I must be obvious that my article is not ready. If it is patent, then it should be easy to tell me exactly where to start! I know it not polished.

I have been asking for concrete help.

Please give me my name "page" back. Douglas Nelson Turner (talk) 09:25, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You can find your contributions by looking at Special:Contributions/Douglas Nelson Turner (which you can see by clicking on the "Contributions" link at the top of any page). If you are looking for your draft article, you can find versions at User:Douglas Nelson Turner/sandbox, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Douglas Nelson Turner, and at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rotating armature alternator. You need to decide which one you wish to work on, and request deletion of the others to avoid confusion. If you want to create a new user page at User:Douglas Nelson Turner, for the purposes described at Wikipedia:User pages, there is nothing to stop you from doing so. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Technically, the content was never actually deleted and was moved to User:Douglas Nelson Turner/sandbox as far as I can see. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Your main user page User:Douglas Nelson Turner is intended for you to say something about yourself and your Wikipedia activites, if you choose to. You can have as many working pages in your "user space" as you like, by creating pages with titles like "User:Douglas Nelson Turner/Sandbox2" or "User:Douglas Nelson Turner/<Article title>". To request deletion of any page in your user space that you no longer want, add {{db-user}} or {{db-u1}} at the top. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

D2DFinserve

D2DFinserve · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

D2DFinserve is a online consultancy portal made by three professionals at the stage of their training and successfully meet to its reach. Currently, serving general business houses with their research reports , market scenario updates and many investment opportunities alerts. Basically,it works together with due diligence to meet its personal as well as organisational objectives. With this name D2DFinserve , they generally meant for Door to Door Financial Services with the help of many online client servicing portals. They are all known for their work and knowledge. -D2dfinserve (talk) 10:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This page was deleted via WP:A7 (lack of notability established for a company) and WP:G11 (unambiguous advertising). Because of this, I'm declining the request. I've also blocked you for having a username that represents a company. You can choose a new username, but I would recommend against trying to add the company to Wikipedia since I can't see where this company would pass our notability guidelines as a whole because I can't find where it's been the focus of reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:42, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RefNet (Reformation Network)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RefNet (Reformation Network) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please undelete this article so that it can be worked on to meet the guideline requirements. Wseaton (talk) 17:32, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Kuhn

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/David Kuhn · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

-216.254.82.65 (talk) 19:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elmedin Ademi

Elmedin Ademi · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Elmedin Ademi is not a spam ! Its a businessman from FYROM Macedonia and he's best known as founder of Screenmedia Macedonia (www.screenmedia.mk), Eurovia (building company) wwww.eurovia.mk and some others trading business -Elmademi (talk) 20:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself and promote your company. This was a blatant advertisement: "one of the most successful personalities... one of the most influential businessmen... market leading... fully integrated marketing program of great depth and scope... highest quality service in every field... " Anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. JohnCD (talk) 21:54, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Island Dreams (2013 film)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Island Dreams (2013 film) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Tamodbx (talk) 20:19, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I'd restored this and started to look for sources, then saw that there's already a version in the mainspace at Island Dreams (film). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:42, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manga High

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Manga High · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 70.198.3.145, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 70.198.3.145 (talk) 01:29, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done I'm declining this because the deleted version was fairly promotional in tone and because it was only 1-2 sentences long. You'd have to completely delete and re-write everything, so there's really nothing there worth saving. It'd be far better for you to re-write the entire article from scratch. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:39, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Museum of Morocco

Museum of Morocco · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mestrekamcio (talk) 09:16, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Page is showing unofficial museum of Morocco.[reply]

Not done The page was written in an incredibly promotional manner and would have required a complete re-write to remove the promotional prose. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:45, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beverley Honig

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Beverley Honig · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 124.168.123.134, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 124.168.123.134 (talk) 10:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Friendlyjordies

Friendlyjordies · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I started this article about a significant youtuber in Australian society. His videos reflect the culture of many Australian places. Please undelete this as i plan to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scondralitus (talk • contribs) 10:54, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric Freeman (Pentecostal Bishop)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric Freeman (Pentecostal Bishop) · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

99.123.174.196 (talk) 11:12, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:HEBPANTRY.gif

File:HEBPANTRY.gif · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Removed several years ago claiming it was "redundant" but there's no other similar item. -TheListUpdater (talk) 15:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grace helbig

Grace helbig · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Probably shouldn't have been indefinitely protected from further creation, but just stick in a redirect to Grace Helbig; thanks. -Abeg92contribs 15:41, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 23.243.229.122, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.243.229.122 (talk) 16:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

==

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 23.243.229.122, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.243.229.122 (talk) 16:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Angie McCartney

Page name goes here · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -23.243.229.122 (talk) 16:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 685: / Line 685: @@
 *{{revisions|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Angie McCartney}}
 <i></i>I, 23.243.229.122, request the undeletion of this [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]]. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. [[Special:Contributions/23.243.229.122|23.243.229.122]] ([[User talk:23.243.229.122|talk]]) 16:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
+== Angie McCartney ==
+*{{revisions|Page name goes here}}
+Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -[[Special:Contributions/23.243.229.122|23.243.229.122]] ([[User talk:23.243.229.122|talk]]) 16:33, 6 May 2014 (UTC)