Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎[[User:69.196.61.55]] reported by User:[[User:Perseverantia|Perseverantia]] (Result:): 2006-09-12T11:34:20 Woohookitty (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "69.196.61.55 (contribs)" with an expiry t
i would like a fair judgement of this situation. Why delete it.. when you could simply say no result taken. Appeal made!
Line 754: Line 754:


User reverted article four times, I warned him, but he reverted the article a fifth time. --[[User:Peephole|Peephole]] 20:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
User reverted article four times, I warned him, but he reverted the article a fifth time. --[[User:Peephole|Peephole]] 20:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

===[[User:CCson]] reported by User:[[User:NinjaNubian|NinjaNubian]] 18:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC) (Result:)===
-
- [[WP:3RR|Three revert rule]] violation on
-
- {{Article|Alpha Phi Alpha}}. {{3RRV|CCson}}:
-
- <!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->
-
- * Previous version reverted to: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&oldid=72743175 02:43, 30 August 2006 ]
- <!-- Use this for simple reverts. For more complex reverts, please include information
- about which previous versions are being reverted to. -->
- * 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&oldid=72749784 04:11, 30 August 2006]
- * 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&oldid=72754857 04:11, 30 August 2006]
- * 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&oldid=72755544 04:16, 30 August 2006]
- * 4th revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alpha_Phi_Alpha&oldid=7275715412:41, 04:28, 30 August 2006]
- <!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->
-
- Three revert rule warning diff from '''before''' this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :
- * [http://WarningDiff DiffTime]
-
-
- Time report made: 18:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- [[User:NinjaNubian|NinjaNubian]] 18:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comments: As can be seen above, this is his second 3rr violation in under two weeks. [[User:NinjaNubian|NinjaNubian]] 18:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I would like a fair hearing of this.



==Copy-paste-edit this for a new report==
==Copy-paste-edit this for a new report==

Revision as of 21:36, 12 September 2006

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.


    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.


    Violations

    Please place new reports at the bottom.

    User: 70.223.69.136 reported by User:Bertilvidet (Result:)

    Three revert rule violation on Iran-Iraq War

    Iran-Iraq_War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 70.223.69.136 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 21:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: Possibly it should have been reported as vandalism, as the edits consist of removing text, inserting a false protected-tag, and inaccurate information about Saddam Hussein’s title. Notice that one of the edit summaries goes like "WP is about verification not truth". Bertilvidet 21:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    After having posted here, what more should be done in order to let the issue be adressed? Bertilvidet 20:39, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Copy-paste-edit this for a new report

    ===[[User:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MiamiDolphins3]] reported by User:~~~ (Result:)===
    
    [[WP:3RR|Three revert rule]] violation on 
    
    {{Article|http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Michaels}}. {{3RRV|VIOLATOR_USERNAME}}: 
    
    <!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->
    
    * Previous version reverted to:  [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
    <!-- Use this for simple reverts. For more complex reverts, please include information 
    about which previous versions are being reverted to. -->
    * 1st revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jason_Michaels&oldid=75339151]
    * 2nd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MiamiDolphins3]
    * 3rd revert: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jason_Michaels&oldid=75355655]
    <!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->
    
    Time report made: ~~~~~
    
    '''I was unaware of the 3RR until today but this user has been deleting every addition I make several times a day for quite some time now.  Today he left me a message to "pour tea on my head" after I readded what he/she had deleted.  Any info I post in the article and true and is sourced.  There are source articles posted on the page for anyone to see.:''' 
    
    

    User:DeathSeeker (2nd violation) reported by User:Nandesuka (Result: 48 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Xbox 360 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). DeathSeeker (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 00:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    • Fresh off of his 3RR block yesterday (see [5]), DeathSeeker jumps back in with both feet and reverts the page four times in 2 hours. I encourage the reviewing admins to read both his talk page; he seems quite intent on ignoring any and all advice. At this point my honest belief is that his only intent is to disrupt. Nandesuka 00:56, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    48 hours, and I'll leave a note on his talk page saying I'll unblock early if he agrees to stop this. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:12, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Winhunter has already blocked him for 48. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:12, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Yea.. looks like we both thinking the same thing. Though please feel free to do the above unblock action if and when you find appropriate. --WinHunter (talk) 02:13, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Jeff Relf reported by User:teb728 (Result: 48h)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Albert Einstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Jeff_Relf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 09:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    48h this time William M. Connolley 09:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:DAde reported by User:BhaiSaab talk (Result: 12 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Islam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). DAde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 18:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    User:E104421 reported by User:Clevelander (Result: protected)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Justin McCarthy (American historian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). E104421 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    Time report made: 21:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: This user has attempted to remove cited information from Wikipedia and has violated the Three-Revert Rule in the process. -- Clevelander 21:03, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    2006-09-06T01:35:10 Blnguyen (Talk | contribs | block) m (Protected Justin McCarthy (American historian): edit-warring [edit=sysop:move=sysop])

    User:66.25.118.240 reported by User:AuburnPilot (Result:24h each)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Birmingham, Alabama (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 66.25.118.240 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 21:30, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    • User is continually reverting uncited commentary stating that the increase in crime within Birmingham, Alabama is due to people who left New Orleans after hurricane Katrina as well as uncited information that corruption within the government has led to increased sewage bills. The diffs above are related to the crime reversions. AuburnPilot

    User:Pete_K reported by User:Hgilbert (Result:)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Rudolf_Steiner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Pete_K (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 22:57, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: Edit war over introduction of long quotes in article; different quote each time.

    Ahhhh... there you have. A different quote each time is not clearly a revert. Interesting William M. Connolley 09:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Jigahurtz reported by User:Nandesuka (Result:24 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Xbox_360 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Jigahurtz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 00:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    • User is reverting the "Hardware" section of the Xbox 360 article in the same way that User:DeathSeeker was before he was blocked for 2 separate 3RR violations this week. DeathSeeker is still under his 3RR block now. I have some suspicion that this is the same user — I've filed a request for CheckUser — but no actual proof. Nandesuka 00:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Blocked for 24 hours for the 3rr violation. Although according to WP:SOCK#Identification_and_handling_of_suspected_sock_puppets checkuser is only one of the ways to determine if someone is a sockpuppet and the editing behaivor here suggests that they are the same person, you may therefore want to consider an indef block for him. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 01:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:CovenantD reported by User:The Judge (Result:)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Template:List of characters appearing in Batman: The Animated Series. CovenantD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :

    • DiffTime The user just did thes same a week ago.


    Time report made: 00:22, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    As you can see from the summaries, I added the underconstruction sign to indicate I was going to edit there for a while before he does his next edit. The user ignored it. This is the second time he does this. He has been following me to edit war.--The Judge 00:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    I have posted to your talk page requesting that you complete the 3RR report. alphaChimp(talk) 01:02, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    I get I'm missing stuff I only don't get what it is. I hate to fill this kind of things. Can you explaind me Like if I were a 5 years old?...please. --The Judge 05:33, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    You're missing the "prev reverted to" so we can't tell if the first revert, is. You missed the times. You used {{ }} not [[ ]] on the article link William M. Connolley 09:42, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ParadoxTom reported by User:PinchasC (Result: 1 week)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Jews for Jesus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). ParadoxTom (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :

    • N/A as he has been blocked 4 times for this already. [11]

    Time report made: 00:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: User is removing the Christianity template from the page. He has been blocked 4 times previously for 3rr violations on this page [12]. The last two blocks being for 48 hours each. I would recommend a longer block here of a week. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 00:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Rex_Germanus reported by User:Colonel_Mustard (Result:48h)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Dutch language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Rex_Germanus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):



    Time report made: 11:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: 4 Reverts in 26 hours. Rex_Germanus' extremely aggressive (leaving threats and insults on other users' Talk pages) and uncivil (see all of Talk:Dutch) mode of editing Wikipedia would seem, in my humble opinion, to deserve yet another slap on the wrist. He's already been blocked four times for 3RR violations on Dutch-language-related articles. Colonel Mustard 11:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    48h for repeated 3RR violator gaming the system. Rex merely did not break 3RR for reverting 2 hours after the 24 hours period. --WinHunter (talk) 13:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Something14 reported by User:Ryūlóng (Result: 16 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Pluto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Something14 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 22:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    User:Irishguy reported by User:81.179.243.112 (Result:24 hours each)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Steve_Buscemi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Irishguy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    1. 22:52, 10 September 2006
    2. 22:47, 10 September 2006
    3. 22:40, 10 September 2006
    4. 22:33, 10 September 2006
    5. 22:24, 10 September 2006
    6. 21:54, 10 September 2006
    7. 21:32, 10 September 2006
    8. 21:19, 10 September 2006
    9. 21:07, 10 September 2006
    10. 18:36, 10 September 2006
    11. 16:21, 10 September 2006
    12. 23:53, 9 September 2006


    Time report made: 23:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: Clearly, I am also guilty of far too many reverts. I took Irishguy's reverting without any discussion or explanation to be vandalistic and carried on reverting. Block me if you feel it necessary, but I think Irishguy's behaviour has been appalling and felt obliged to report it somewhere. I tried to discuss on talk, but was met with continuous unexplained reverts instead of any attempt to explain himself. 81.179.243.112 23:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    The above editor was wholesale deleting entire sections. His talk consisted of calling people morons [14]. He was warned by multiple editors, policy was outlines to him, and yet he continued to delete entire sections and use abusive edit summaries and comments. IrishGuy talk 23:20, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    It was an content dispute anyways, not vandalism. 24 hours each Jaranda wat's sup 23:32, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Paul_venter reported by User:--chris.lawson (Result: 8 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on Comair_Flight_5191 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) by Paul_venter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    • Previous version reverted to: 09:06

    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :

    Time report made: 23:23, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: Actually, it appears to me that the editor introduced the material with 22:33 9 Sept. It was removed (according to previous discussion on the talk page), and that removal was reverted during a series of edits including the one listed above as the previous version. The reported reverts would then be the 2nd through 5th. VxSote 02:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    8 hours William M. Connolley 07:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:129.252.106.44 reported by User:Jiang (Result:24 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    List of countries by Human Development Index (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 129.252.106.44 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :

    Time report made: 23:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: Repeatedly changing the ranking of this list to insert Taiwan despite citations on the talk page to do otherwise. Was warned. Reverting a whole host of other articles.--Jiang 23:25, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:83.130.97.111 reported by User:Carbonate (Result:semiprotection)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Casualties_of_the_2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 83.130.97.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 01:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: The user in question seems to be coming from a dynamic IP address that are all from the same ISP. All the posts to the talk page have followed a similar style so I have concluded that this is a 3RR violation. In an attempt not to bite, I posted a warning to the articles talk page and suggested a cooling off periode which was later broken in a 5th revert in 24hrs. I'm sure that this is a matter of a new editor not knowing the policies (they have finally started signing their posts) but this is a senetive issue and these actions have been disrupting the efforts to make improvements to the material in question; CP/M comm |Wikipedia Neutrality Project has been helping in this regard. I'm not sure a formal block is in order as I suspect that if the powers that be requested the user to stop, they would do so. Carbonate 01:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Huaiwei reported by User:Yuje (Result:72h)

    Three revert rule violation on

    National_dish (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Huaiwei (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 14:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: Continuation of a months-old revert war. Frankly, I don't know why User:Huaiwei seems to deliberately keep targetting me for reverts. He originally objected to the additions on the basis that Hong Kong isn't a nation. When pointed to him that other countries appear on the list, he shifts is argument that Hong Kong-style milk tea et al doesn't exist. Long discussions and lists on links on the talk page shows that it does. He then disputes their prominence, which is shown through another list of external links. All throughout, he keeps on claiming I'm conducting original research, despite me providing links. He also keeps claiming none of my sources are valid, despite the fact that he seems quite intent on adding long lists of entries himself, without the same standard he sets for me (but no one else). [16] [17] [18] He has not responded to requests by me to confirm any of his own additions yet keeps demanding them from me. If you'll note the history page, you'll see that many of my entries were added or readded at some point or another by Instantnood, McyJerry, Novacatz, and Terence ong, while he seems to be the only one deleting them. If you'll see on the page, he's made whopping 46 reverts on this page. The lastest reverts stem from me adding a government postal stamp depicting of my entries. He reverted me, contending I'm still conducting original research, so I added more external links from government websites and a documentary to try to appease him, and he still kept reverting me a couple more times. Frankly, I think because of the fact that he's setting the standard of evidence, and seems to have declared himself both judge and jury, there'll be no standard he'll ever accept, and he just wants to keep reverting me to be difficult. Also, I think he might still be on a revert-war probation that stemmed from his countless revert wars. --Yuje 14:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    72h because of repeated violation of 3RR by user on probation. --WinHunter (talk) 14:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:NinjaNubian reported by User:Errabee (Result: 12 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Alpha_Phi_Alpha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). NinjaNubian (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 15:23, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

    User:Ccson reported by User:Errabee (Result: warning)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Alpha_Phi_Alpha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ccson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :

    • not done, only after 4th diff warning was given: [19] However, user seems to know about WP:3RR: 30 August, 05:12

    Comments: User:Bearly541 reverted the other two additions/reversions from User:NinjaNubian. Errabee 15:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Time report made: 15:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

    With no "prev version" I think a warning is probably appropriate William M. Connolley 21:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

      • First of all, Errabee, I did not revert NinjaNubian's user page. Second, I reverted edits he made on Alpha Phi Alpha and Kappa Alpha Psi. Bearly541 03:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • Perhaps if you wouldn't let your emotions interfere with your reading, you would notice that I never said you reverted NN's user page. I simply noticed NN made 6 (more or less identical) changes to Alpha Phi Alpha; Ccson more or less reverted four of those, and you reverted the other two. Errabee 03:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
          • Errabee, please clarify which page I reverted in order to avoid this mix-up, next time. I reverted his edits on Alpha Phi Alpha, not his user page. Thank you! Bearly541 03:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
            • Can we please do this discussion in one place? I get a bit tired of placing the same answer on three different pages. I answered on your (Bearly541) talk page, let's keep the discussion there. (BTW, I'm going to sleep now, so don't expect an answer soon). Errabee 03:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Carfiend reported by User:Bubba73 (talk), (Result: 24 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    List of space exploration milestones, 1957-1969 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Carfiend (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    This user also has an RfC about him on a different article. Bubba73 (talk), 16:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    See: [| RFC] Here is a link to the RFC on Carfiend: [| RFC - Carfiend]. Bubba73 (talk), 16:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Blocked for 24 hours [24] - Glen 16:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Inxs001 reported by User:DutchSeduction (Result: 24h)

    Three revert rule violation on

    David_DeAngelo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Inxs001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 21:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    There are possibly as many as 10 different reverts done by this link spammer. since late August. A look at his editing history shows only an untiring dedication to posting this one advertisement on this page! Thanks for the help.

    Its not 3RR but it is pointless linkspam so I've blocked for that William M. Connolley 21:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Snowolfd4 reported by User:Trincomanb (Result: protected)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Liberation_Tigers_of_Tamil_Eelam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Snowolfd4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    • Previous version reverted to: [30]
    • 1st revert: [31]
    • 2nd revert: [32]
    • 3rd revert: [33]
    • 4th revert: [34]

    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 22:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    There had been an ongoing debate and it was shown by a number users that the extra reference and sentence did not add anything to the article and was simply POV motivated. However this user keeps reverting back to his version without any discussion on this with other users. Trincomanb 22:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Socks abound; article is protected; it wasn't 3RR anyway William M. Connolley 12:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:69.196.61.55 reported by User:Perseverantia (Result: 48h)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Krav_Maga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 69.196.61.55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Time report made: 03:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments: This user has already been warned twice previously and blocked once [41] for violations of 3RR. Please consider taking more permanent action. Perseverantia 03:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


    2006-09-12T11:34:20 Woohookitty (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "69.196.61.55 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 48 hours (3RR on Krav Maga) William M. Connolley 21:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:BhaiSaab reported by User:CltFn

    Three revert rule violation on

    User:CltFn (edit | [[Talk:User:CltFn|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). BhaiSaab (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    • Previous version reverted to: [42]
    • 1st revert: [43]
    • 2nd Revert: [44]
    • 3rd revert: [45]
    • 4th revert: [46]

    Comments: 3rr doesn't apply towards vandalism.wrong case Also, you've also had four reverts within 24 hours: [47], [48], [49], [50]. BhaiSaab talk 11:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    Note to Admin::Those are edits and besides they are edits in my user space --CltFn 12:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    This is the same case as here: [51]. CltFn seems to be admin-fishing. BhaiSaab talk 11:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    BhaiSaab, instead of trying to misdirect the blame else where you ought to recognize that you broke the 3RR rule.--CltFn 12:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:BADMINton reported by User:Ragib (Result: 24 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Robert Vadra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). BADMINton (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):


    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :


    Time report made: 09:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

    Comments:

    • User has engaged into inserting unreferenced libelous comments into the article. Despite removal per WP:BLP, and explanation of the policy to the user, s/he has repeatedly reverted the article, without providing any references. Also, violation of WP:CIVIL has occured in his comments in response to the citation requests/warnings. --Ragib 09:01, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Ernham reported by User:Ian Dalziel (Result: 24 hours)

    Three revert rule violation on

    Michael_Schumacher (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ernham (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    and

    Juan Manuel Fangio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Ernham (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    Time report made: 15:07, 12 September 2006 Comments:

    Ernham has reverted the same sentence in the opening paragraph (of Michael_Schumacher) at least at 12:35, 10:02, 07:15, 04:08 and 03:46 today - there are more!

    Several users have tried to get him to discuss his edits - the only response is extreme personal abuse. -- Ian Dalziel 13:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User also started an edit war at Juan Manuel Fangio on the same topic; basically, the user claims that Schumacher is the greatest driver of all times, and erases the sourced statement that many consider Fangio to be the greatest. Several users tryed to reason with an this user, who often answered with personal attacks (see User talk:Ernham, Talk:Juan Manuel Fangio and Talk:Michael Schumacher. Mariano(t/c) 13:25, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]



    User:J henry waugh reported by User:Peephole (Result:)

    Three revert rule violation on

    David Ray Griffin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). J henry waugh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) :

    Time report made: 20:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

    User reverted article four times, I warned him, but he reverted the article a fifth time. --Peephole 20:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    User:CCson reported by User:NinjaNubian 18:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC) (Result:)

    - - Three revert rule violation on - - Alpha Phi Alpha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). CCson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): - - - - * Previous version reverted to: 02:43, 30 August 2006 - - * 1st revert: 04:11, 30 August 2006 - * 2nd revert: 04:11, 30 August 2006 - * 3rd revert: 04:16, 30 August 2006 - * 4th revert: 04:28, 30 August 2006 - - - Three revert rule warning diff from before this report was filed here (necessary only for new users) : - * DiffTime - - - Time report made: 18:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC) - NinjaNubian 18:06, 12 September 2006 (UTC) - - Comments: As can be seen above, this is his second 3rr violation in under two weeks. NinjaNubian 18:39, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    I would like a fair hearing of this.


    Copy-paste-edit this for a new report

    ===[[User:]] reported by User:~~~ (Result:)===
    
    [[WP:3RR|Three revert rule]] violation on 
    
    {{Article|}}. {{3RRV|VIOLATOR_USERNAME}}: 
    
    <!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->
    
    * Previous version reverted to:  [http://VersionLink VersionTime]
    <!-- Use this for simple reverts. For more complex reverts, please include information 
    about which previous versions are being reverted to. -->
    * 1st revert: [http://]
    * 2nd revert: [http://]
    * 3rd revert: [http://]
    <!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->
    
    Time report made: ~~~~~
    
    ''' Comments:'''