Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule. See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report. If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page. You must notify any user you have reported. You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. Additional notes When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first. The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from. Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection. Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed. Definition of edit warring Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring. Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR) An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions. Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Click here to create a new report

User:LetsDoDrag253 reported by User:General Ization (Result: blocked)

Page

Alaska Thunderfuck (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

LetsDoDrag253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 17:59, 26 December 2017 (UTC) "Fuck you you little child"
2. 17:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC) ""
3. 17:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by Nikkimaria (talk)"
4. Consecutive edits made from 17:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC) to 18:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
   1. 17:44, 25 December 2017 (UTC) "/* 2007–2012: Career beginnings */"
   2. 17:45, 25 December 2017 (UTC) "/* 2013–2015: RuPaul's Drag Race */"
   3. 18:01, 25 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Discography */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. [1]
2. 17:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC) "Final warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Alaska Thunderfuck. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. [2]

Comments:

Several editors have attempted to educate this user on the article's talk page and it also appears this user may have a COI. LovelyLillith (talk) 18:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Blocked indef but back as 2606:A000:4249:CA00:D17F:7985:9DB8:A531 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). General Ization ^Talk 22:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked again by someone else; if it pops up again, feel free to re-open or just pop a request on WP:RFPP due to socking. --slakr^\ talk / 21:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

User: CBG17 - Edit Waring (result: declined)

• Pinto Martins – Fortaleza International Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This User keep still removing important Information in Page imposing own desire. Please Protect the Page against this user, thanks 92.76.86.106 (talk) 18:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Looks like the reporting IP is the one edit warring unencycloapedic content. Canterbury Tail talk 18:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

The information that is being removed has no encyclopaedic value which I have stated to the user multiple times but doesn’t seem to get the message and is adding the information for their own pleasure, there is nothing significant about these aircraft being abandoned there. Also none of the content is referenced CBG17 (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

The aircrafts are part of airport history, because of TAF. Indeed the bathroom is not important info also, neither the building, neither the runway. Just say : Pinto Martins – Fortaleza International Airport is an Airport that is all said. Either Destinations are really not important, because each aircraft which flies has always a destination, an the immense list of private jets are never mentioned. So it is a personal limit. As long as by time those thing are static part of facility, like Lufthansa Flight 181 there was, brought huge attention to the field. As Wikipedia is a playground of several people, let's leave a gap, how the radar, antennas, escalators, bar, restaurant, lights and several lists of things in an airport concept are... Good Luck destroying other's research. Of what about is encyclopedic, the majority of articles like novels, bibliographies and many bullshit are also not or less important, but they are here. This is fully subjective 92.76.86.106 (talk) 22:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Declined; you're both edit warring. Take it to the talk page. --slakr^\ talk / 21:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

User: 152.232.198.139 - Edit Waring (result: protected)

• Embraer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This User keep still removing important Information in Page imposing own desire. Please Protect the Page against this user, thanks 92.76.86.106 (talk) 18:27, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

It's teh reporting IP that's edit warring unencyclopaedic content here. Recommend a wooden hand powered hunting weapon. Canterbury Tail talk 18:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

... yeah, like every north-american wants to make wars using wooden guns to destroy nature, cougars for example, to make trophies, don't you ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.76.86.106 (talk) 22:10, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

• Page protected by someone else --slakr^\ talk / 21:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

User:62.253.196.108 reported by User:GB fan (Result: protected)

Page

Shirley Bassey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

62.253.196.108 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 18:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817147423 by Baseball Bugs (talk)"
2. 12:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817140061 by GB fan (talk)The sources are high quality enough thank you. Please stop attacking me and see the administrators case opened already."
3. 11:25, 26 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817089590 by Binksternet (talk)Reinstated valid edit by editor who is now in edit war & has abused the 3R rule so is now going to be blocked"
4. 11:04, 25 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 816798491 by FlightTime (talk)Not trivia. She made the claim on camera & it is reported in TWO biographies thus notable & worthy of inclusion."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Editor was warned in the very first edit to their page about edit warring. Looking through their contributions almost all of their edits are reverts. They have not made a single edit to an article talk page. ~ GB fan 19:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

I semi-protected Shirley Bassey and Rock Profile (where another incarnation of this IP user is also edit warring) after an AN/I report for two days, which of course does not preclude other action. ansh666 20:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

• Page protected by someone else --slakr^\ talk / 21:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

User:2001:569:74EF:BD00:6461:8DAB:C394:9B7E reported by User:Philip J Fry (Result: )

Page

Angelique Boyer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

2001:569:74EF:BD00:6461:8DAB:C394:9B7E (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. Consecutive edits made from 01:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC) to 01:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
   1. 01:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC) ""
   2. 01:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC) ""
   3. 01:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "They broke up long time ago and should not be added."
   4. 01:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC) ""
2. 01:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "They broke up long time ago and should not be added."
3. 01:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "Please don't add gossip content per WP:NOTTABLOID. I forgot to explain."
4. Consecutive edits made from 01:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC) to 01:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
   1. 01:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "WP:NOTTABLOID"
   2. 01:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC) ""
5. Consecutive edits made from 00:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC) to 00:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
   1. 00:51, 27 December 2017 (UTC) ""
   2. 00:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC) ""
   3. 00:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 01:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "General note: Removal of content, blanking on Angelique Boyer. (TW)"
2. 01:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Angelique Boyer */ new section"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

The user persists in removing information, alleging that it is gossip, which is not true, because the relationship that Boyer had with Castro was remarkable as well as the relationship he currently has with Rulli. The ip removes information also in the Sebastián Rulli article. It also does not respond to messages. Philip J Fry / talk 01:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

I am sure that relationship content should not be added per WP:NOTTABLOID because Wikipedia is not a dating history website. 2001:569:74EF:BD00:6461:8DAB:C394:9B7E (talk) 01:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

@2001:569:74ef:bd00:6461:8dab:c394:9b7e and Philip J Fry: You guys are both violating the three-revert rule. Use the talk page and discuss the issue there. Consider bringing in a third opinion or other forms of dispute resolution. --slakr^\ talk / 21:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

@Slakr: The problem has been solved, because the user has not reverted more and has not commented on it. I do not know what to think.--Philip J Fry / talk 21:47, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

User:KINGPORUS reported by User:Crawford88 (Result: )

Page: Karna (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: KINGPORUS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [3]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [4]
2. [5]
3. [6]
4. [7]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Karna#Semi-protected edit request on 18 December 2017 and User talk:KINGPORUS#Dec, 2017

Comments:

User:James343e reported by User:MShabazz (Result: )

Page: African Americans (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: James343e (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Note: This is a complaint about edit-warring, not a report of a 3RR violation.

Diffs of the user's edits:

1. [8]
2. [9]
3. [10]
4. [11]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warnings:

1. [12]
2. [13]

Comments:
James343e is making changes to the article contrary to what the sources say, and he is edit-warring to keep his changes in place. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Etaripcisum reported by User:Favonian (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page: Quantity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Etaripcisum (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Special:PermaLink/816457431

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Special:Diff/817339078
2. Special:Diff/817354748
3. Special:Diff/817355440
4. Special:Diff/817355685
5. Special:Diff/817356056

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Special:PermaLink/817355506

Comments:
WP:GTP, I guess. Favonian (talk) 21:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:34, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

User:94.187.88.92 reported by User:Swazzo (Result: )

Page: Sidon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 94.187.88.92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [14]
2. [15]
3. [16]
4. [17] IP hopped to 94.187.50.36

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [18]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [19]

Comments:
IP user keeps changing the infobox head claiming French is "100% an official language in Lebanon". I explained the status of French language in Lebanon in their talk pre-Ip hop and they keep reverting. Even though the reverts are outside the 24-hour mark, the IP user does not show signs of refraining anytime soon. Issue is also at Beirut (3RR within 24-hours, should've reported for this page), Byblos and Nabatieh. Swazzo (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

They now left me a message on my talk with a registered user page. The exact same thing they said on the IP page, same behavior and same tone up to the use of all caps. Looks like a duck to me. Swazzo (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Jamezzz981 reported by User:Jonathanjoseph81 (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page: Katy Perry discography (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jamezzz981 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Katy_Perry_discography&diff=816951176&oldid=816951138 [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [20]
2. [21]
3. [22]
4. [23]
5. [24]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [25]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [26]

Comments:
The user keeps reverting sourced material from the page. The material they are reverting is not made up, false, slander, etc, there is simply no reason for this user to continue to revert my edits; especially with it being sourced. They refuse to ever respond to my comments and just remove - not even properly revert as they know I would get a notification and see it - my edits. Any help in getting this user blocked from editing or whatever you can do would be greatly appreciated. --Jonathan Joseph (talk) 06:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours For disruptive editing NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Maxí reported (Result: Declined)

Page: https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad
User being reported: https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notandi:Max%C3%AD, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Max%C3%AD

Previous version before vandalism: https://is.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jihad&oldid=1560270

Attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spjall:Jihad

Comments:
User (page: https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notandi:Max%C3%AD, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Max%C3%AD) has deleted page https://is.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jihad repeatedly passed multiple warnings and replaced with false content, his dialogue and reasons mostly look like political rant. The user has worked on Wikipedia for some time with some complaints, but this particular article "goes over his head". Please block. 46.182.190.168 (talk) 12:46, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• Declined This is the English-language Wikipedia. We have no jurisdiction over Wikipedias for other languages. NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:50, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Bastun edit war (Result: Page semied)

User:Bastun has six times in the last two weeks] made the same edit despite being repeatedly reverted.91.207.214.33 (talk) 14:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• Yes, "being repeatedly reverted" by you. You appear to have been logging out to continue making the same crap edits: This is disruptive, as well as effectively socking to continue your edit war. That's plenty policy broken there. >SerialNumber54129^{...speculates} 14:52, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Serial Number 54129 Even if that was true how is that relevant to his edit warring?91.207.214.33 (talk) 14:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Bastun hasn't violated WP:3RR and has used the talk page, unlike you. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:NeilN You don't have to break the 3RR for it to be edit warring, as you well know.91.207.214.33 (talk) 15:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• Page protected NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:92.76.86.106 reported by User:CBG17 (Result: Declined)

Page: Pinto Martins – Fortaleza International Airport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 92.76.86.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pinto_Martins_%E2%80%93_Fortaleza_International_Airport&diff=817461365&oldid=817460480

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [27]
2. [28]
3. [29]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [30]

Comments:
The user keeps vandalising the page and adding unreferenced and unencyclopedic information to the page and is adding images that are not needed as they are similar to images already presented and creates clutter to the page. The user has already been warned on their talk page before. The user has also used 2 or 3 different IP addresses in the past to vandalise the page CBG17 (talk) 15:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• Declined I see this is the reverse of the report made a few days ago. As slakr said then, take it to the talk page - I see it's still empty. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:169.239.20.27 reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result:blocked 31h)

Page

Religious and philosophical views of Albert Einstein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

169.239.20.27 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 19:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817496427 by Tgeorgescu (talk) No evidence of Sockpuppetry. File an SPI if you wish."
2. 19:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817496000 by Tgeorgescu (talk) I'm not a vandal or a troll. The link you gave says trolls and socks and arent allowed to edit. Please read your own links."
3. 19:37, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817494876 by Tgeorgescu (talk) Unsourced. He himself stated that he believed in a "cosmic religion" as can be seen by reading this article."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

3RR warning: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3A45.114.118.154&type=revision&diff=817345067&oldid=817341166 Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:45, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 19:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "God or god"
2. 19:54, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* God or god */ another source"
3. 20:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ see"
4. 20:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ unsigned"
5. 20:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ preposterous"
6. 20:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ reply"
7. 20:27, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ why it isn't sure"
8. 20:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ reply"
9. 20:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ reply"
10. 20:42, 27 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ typo"
11. 19:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ purely secular"
12. 19:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Verify? */ addition"

Comments:

Manipulation at its finest.

1. That warning on my talk page was AFTER all those reverts.
2. You kept accusing me of being a sock and using that as a justification to go revert me. I reverted you in turn as that was nonsense. Do not try to frame this as some sort of edit war.169.239.20.27 (talk) 19:51, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:DUCK says enough, also edit warring through collocation proxies says enough. Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

All I am seeing is unproven accusations169.239.20.27 (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

IP: 169.239.20.27

Decimal: 2851017755 Hostname: s0332b.be21.dc4.jb.sa.iptp.net ASN: 41095 ISP: IPTP LTD Organization: IPTP LTD Services: Network sharing device or proxy server Type: Broadband

Assignment: Static IP

Quoted by Tgeorgescu (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

What exactly is your point?169.239.20.27 (talk) 19:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

I've just proven you're a WP:SOCK. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

You have proven I use proxies which is necessary for someone living in China. 169.239.20.27 (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

You're a banned user and therefore not welcome here. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Who am I then?169.239.20.27 (talk) 20:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

For a start, Chinese residents are not allowed to edit through open proxies. Nobody is. If you were a Chinese resident, you already knew this. Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

I notice that dodge there. Please answer the question. Wiki policy, explicitly states Chinest residents can use proxies. I just checked. 169.239.20.27 (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

It just doesn't say "open proxies". Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

It states "Open or anonymising proxies, including Tor, may be blocked from editing for any period at any time. While this may affect legitimate users, they are not the intended targets and may freely use proxies until those are blocked"169.239.20.27 (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

It is probably worth noting that the IP started a thread at WP:ANI#User:Tgeorgescu ignoring WP:PROXY apparent!y after this thread was opened here. John Carter (talk) 21:11, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: Blocked 31h--Ymblanter (talk) 21:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Sanketssatpute reported by User:Chrissymad (Result: Blocked)

Page

Narayan Tilakchand Kuche (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Sanketssatpute (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 21:33, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "The details data of him and his family"
2. Consecutive edits made from 21:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC) to 21:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
   1. 21:24, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "The latest data regarding him by using the public data avilable through the Facebook page"
   2. 21:25, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "viewingchanges"
   3. 21:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "viewingchanges"
3. 21:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817506600 by Chrissymad (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 21:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Narayan Tilakchand Kuche. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Continuing to add unsourced spammy content to article with no attempts to discuss or provide source after several attempts. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked SQL^{Query me!} 21:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

User:66.218.56.190 reported by User:EvergreenFir (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page

Rape in Sweden (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

66.218.56.190 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 02:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817546388 by EvergreenFir (talk) Not reliable according to who? You? Bugger off."
2. 02:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817545534 by Seraphim System (talk)"
3. 02:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817544218 by Seraphim System (talk) Source is substantiated, not unreliable."
4. 22:35, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 816720173 by Seraphim System (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 02:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Rape in Sweden. (TW)"
2. 02:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Rape in Sweden. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Personal attacks as well EvergreenFir (talk) 02:55, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

I started a discussion on whether or not the material should be included on the talk page of the article. Please check it out and (possibly) comment on it. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 02:57, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

There have already been multiple discussions at RS/n - as an example see Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_211#Is_Breitbart.com_reliable?. There is no need for another one. I would agree with Seraphimblade's comments in the RS/n discussion.Seraphim System ^(talk) 03:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:57, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Cjhard reported by User:Carmaker1 (Result: No violation)

Page

Snowflakes (Toni Braxton album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Cjhard (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 09:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Snowflakes (Toni Braxton album)

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 09:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "/* Talk:Snowflakes (Toni Braxton album)#Recording Period

Comments:

I removed incorrect information that was submitted by an IP user [31], that was potentially a vandal back on September 4, 2013. User: Cjhard has been unusually following my edits and undoing them the past week, following an ANI discussion they participated in. I cannot help but feel, there is an unusual element of negative bias towards me and that they are edit-warring to blockade my contributions to Wikipedia out of spite. The date provided of 2000-01 was restored back to 2001 by me, as the article has no citation supporting it, since the IP user never added a source nor have any other users since September 4, 2013. I addressed this in the article talk page and Cjhard has ignored my findings, highlighting possible vandalism. This has similarly already happened at the TLC Creep (TLC song) article, in which I provided a recording date of 1993-1994 based on speaking with the engineer for the project, to correct the vague and unsupported "Late 1993 - September 1994 date". It was reverted by Cjhard, so in response I deleted the other date 1993-September 1994, upon having it no source. USer: Beyoncetan ended up submitting very similar information of 1993-94, after I tried to, with no interference from this user. Editing upon personal bias towards another user by constantly their reverting edits (especially in this case), constitutes edit warring. Carmaker1 (talk) 10:52, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

• No violation I note that you've opened an ANI thread about this, a mediation request, and this 3RR report, however, you have NEVER posted a comment on the talk page of the article in an attempt to resolve the dispute. That should be one of the first steps in dispute resolution, not WP:FORUMSHOPPING. only (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC) OOPS: I was looking at the Secrets talk page, not the Snowflakes. only (talk) 14:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

User:MarioProtIV being reported by User:The Nth User (Result: )

Page:

2017–18 North American winter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported:

MarioProtIV (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 01:48, 29 December 2017
2. 01:56, 29 December 2017
3. 03:52, 29 December 2017
4. 16:27, 29 December 2017

Diffs of warnings on MarioProtIV's talk page:

1. 03:18, 29 December 2017
2. 04:35, 29 December 2017, used the Uw-3rr template

The warnings focused more on MarioProtIV breaking the rule's spirit, as opposed to the rule's fine text, so I most likely would have reported MarioProtIV anyway if the user had not made a fourth revert this time but reverted some more additions to the Events section a few days later.

The user in question started a discussion on the talk page around the time of the fourth revert:

1. 16:25, 29 December 2017

So far, no one else has responded yet.

Reporter's Comments:
Before today, the user had a history of reverting additions to the Events section. (See the edit history of the page.) I mentioned this in my first warning. I also mentioned in my first warning that MarioProtIV used the same excuse, non-notability, to revert each addition, although at least some of the reverted content, like a storm that cut power for almost 1.5 million people (1.2 million in the American northeast and 0.2 million in Canada), was clearly notable. I would also like to say that the user also seems to have accumulated a history of edits considered to be unconstructive or edit warring by other users just in the past five weeks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Nth User (talk • contribs) 17:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Comment Okay this is completely absurd. You’re accusing me of being disruptive, yet I am actually doing the right thing by removing non-significant events as to not clutter up the page (there would be 40 sections if we went by that). Plus, the IP consistently kept re-adding the events even after I advised not to. Next time please actually read the rules instead of falsely accusing me of an edit war whereas I am simply trying to do the right thing. --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 19:21, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Also, you didn’t try to start something on the talk page to settle the dispute (which I had to do to try to cool things off but you decide otherwise) nor did you attempt to revert me, instead you took it out on me as if I’m doing the wrong thing. Also, how are my edits “unconstructive” whereas just a few days ago I took the liberty of finishing a draft someone started and he thanked me for doing so? --MarioProtIV (^talk/_contribs) 19:38, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Mr. bobby reported by User:Doug Weller (Result: )

Page

Venus figurines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Mr. bobby (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 19:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817655087 by Joe Roe (talk) stick to logic"
2. 19:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817653210 by Joe Roe (talk)joe roe contradicts definition (read the beginning of the article)"
3. 17:20, 29 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817512485 by Joe Roe (talk) otherwise the article is contradictive and destroyed."
4. 19:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 817352701 by Joe Roe (talk) per definition "venus figurines" is the category for paleolithic figuriens. later sculptures (f.i,. roman ones) are a different thing. tatuettes"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

This would not appear to be a breach of the three revert rule, although the 'gaming the system' aspect may be applicable - hard to tell as two of the last three reverts were outside the 24 hrs. I would recommend a Level 3 or 4 warning at this point, another block if another revert is made. Oscar247 (talk) 20:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Previous block for editwarring. Doug Weller talk 20:36, 29 December 2017 (UTC)