Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Operation Haudegen: User(s) blocked (using responseHelper)
→‎Kevin Leyes: Requesting semi-protection of Kevin Leyes. (TW)
Line 98: Line 98:
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' In the news, vandalism ensued. Please semi-protect for a week. --[[User:Bender235|bender235]] ([[User talk:Bender235|talk]]) 19:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' In the news, vandalism ensued. Please semi-protect for a week. --[[User:Bender235|bender235]] ([[User talk:Bender235|talk]]) 19:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s|1 week}} [[User:Airplaneman|Airplaneman]] [[User talk:Airplaneman|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Airplaneman|✈]] 19:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
:{{RFPP|s|1 week}} [[User:Airplaneman|Airplaneman]] [[User talk:Airplaneman|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/Airplaneman|✈]] 19:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

=== [[:Kevin Leyes]] ===
* {{pagelinks|1=Kevin Leyes}}

'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]] – Clearly a sock[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Below_in_the_box] trying to delete the article in [[Wikipedia:Bad faith|bad-faith]]. [[User:Hissamelriys|Hissamelriys]] ([[User talk:Hissamelriys|talk]]) 19:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)


== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==
== Current requests for reduction in protection level ==

Revision as of 19:42, 25 March 2020

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Timeline of the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India

    Pending changes protection: The page is currently Extended confirmed protection. it may be valuable if it has pending changes protection Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 06:28, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Mr.Mani Raj Paul: could you elaborate a bit please? Do you want the protection lowered, or pending changes protection put on top of the existing protection? Lectonar (talk) 07:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Dino Jelusić

    Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring – possible surname difference. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 07:02, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    2020 Luzon enhanced community quarantine

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Highly visible page; Disruptive editing from IPs . —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Vivek Agnihotri

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Brihaspati (talk) 10:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Niruben Amin

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent removal of cited content by IPs and new users. Nizil (talk) 11:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Dubbing (filmmaking)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Extensive socking from the same puppeteer through IPs and socks. Requesting temporary PP atleast for the time being. Gotitbro (talk) 11:23, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Koko Pimentel

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. KH-1 (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Muhajir people

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Constant disruptive and contentious editing by IP, complete unwillingness to discuss. Gotitbro (talk) 11:57, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Dravidian peoples

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing and block evasion by a sock puppet. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 15:49, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Candidates Tournament 2020

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Until 5 Apr after the tournament concludes. The last nine edits are each IP reverts of one another, and the chaos must abate: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 15:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-administrator comment) Have the involved parties considered taking the issue to WP:ARBREQ? –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    That is an appalling false equivalence, and would only lend this disruptive IP troll credibility and modicum of respect that they do not deserve. It's one IPv6, Joserobjr, Adpete, and I who have contributed on the talk page. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 16:35, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) Excuse me for following WP:GOODFAITH. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    As you are well aware, WP:AGF is not meant to be used on those who are intentionally disruptive, which this IP is. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 16:53, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) You're not doing yourself any favors by directing abuse at other editors ("Bandera apologist neo-fascist") –Skywatcher68 (talk) 16:55, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    You're not doing yourself any favors by sidestepping the fact that the only person who has refused to post on the talk page is this IP. Also, conveniently ignoring their astonishing [10] [11] [12] [13] in 42 minutes. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Its a fake claim about "only person". Another persons: [14] [15] 94.178.235.125 (talk) 17:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    This is a pathetic non-attempt at deflection. Your first diff is showing a registered user (not yourself) contributing to the discussion, your second only bolsters the case that IPs are the sole source of disruption. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 17:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    And that user said: I the person who wanted to include tiebreakers. So you removed the sourced info (and my posts many times), plus huge personal attacks. See: [16] [17] 94.178.235.125 (talk) 17:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Johnny Cash

    Temporary protection: Persistent vandalism. Serols (talk) 16:16, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator HJ Mitchell. Favonian (talk) 16:50, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Julia Kaye

    Semi-protection: IPs repeatedly re-inserting disputed content at a BLP without explanation. WanderingWanda (talk) 18:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Operation Haudegen

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent blanking by IP. Flix11 (talk) 18:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. for 72 hours by Kinu. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 19:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Orthohantavirus

    Temporary semi-protection: In the news, vandalism ensued. Please semi-protect for a week. --bender235 (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman (talk) ✈ 19:40, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Kevin Leyes

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Clearly a sock[18] trying to delete the article in bad-faith. Hissamelriys (talk) 19:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Shortcuts

    File:Abercrombie kids logo.png

    Unsuppress file history: to enable exportation to commons/restoring image quality. The image is a public domain text logo originally wrongly tagged as fair use, therefore file history is errantly suppressed. 17jiangz1 (talk) 15:19, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    2020 coronavirus pandemic in India

    Semi-protection: This page currently has Extended confirmed protection. Make it as Semi-protected. Reason: The common page is Semi-protected. Givingbacktosociety (talk) 01:19, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @NJA:, the protecting admin. Lectonar (talk) 07:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment Why not apply indefinite semi-protection for this article like other some country specific articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.77.93.25 (talk) 11:01, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Because every article has to be judged on its own merits (or non-merits, in this case). Let's wait what the protecting admin has to say. Lectonar (talk) 11:12, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lectonar: Givingbacktosociety may be unaware as they're a newer account, but it is ECP due to Arbitration committee sanctions on the topic. See the notes here, N.J.A. | talk 11:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – No changes to the current protection level are required at this point in time. This is definitely the wrong time to remove ECP because of the lockdown. Doug Weller talk 17:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
    Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


    Israel–Hamas war

    "On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including British, Polish, Australian, and Irish nationals, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" is incorrect and should be reworded as

    "On 1 April, seven aid workers from World Central Kitchen, including a dual US-Canada national, a Palestinian, three British citizens, an Australian, and a Pole, were killed in an Israeli airstrike south of Deir al-Balah" as per [19], [20]. 148.75.59.49 (talk) 23:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Israel–Hamas war

    I suggest adding to 'War Crimes' a section about the Sde Teiman detention camp. The use of concentration/torture camps is a very notable war crime and an important fact as it pertains to the ceasefire negotiations regarding hostage swaps. It is also relevant as many have been taken from Gaza and are being tortured under pretext of "interrogation." Jdftba (talk) 08:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC) Create a level 3 header with a link to the article in question, then a {{pagelinks}} template and then the reason. It looks like this: Wikipedia:Example (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Example|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) your request here. ~~~~[reply]

    ''The Frankfurt School page, the Discussion and the Talk are semi-protected so I could not submit this to the editors.

    The section on Cultural Marxism is extremely slanted, even in the title of that section (which is not linked in the table of contents) it is referred to only as Cultural Marxism Conspiracy Theory. At the very least, that should be edited to Cultural Marxism, in line with the other headings on the page. There is no mention or discussion whatsoever that Cultural Marxism is a political analysis that doesn't necessarily have anything to do with a 'far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory', although any history of that certainly can/should be mentioned in this section as well.

    'You should not discount, refuse to note, dismiss or remove a political theory/analysis, just because it has been mentioned or utilized at some time in history or in some form by a far-right or far-left group or because you disagree with it. Cultural Marxism actually needs its own Wiki page', but I think that's a different story. I likely will be applying to edit this page in a few days or write a separate Cultural Marxism one -- I can't seem to find my old Wiki account, so had to create a new one.

    Handled requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=947350599"