Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2D (talk | contribs) at 17:53, 27 December 2008 (→‎Attercopus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Soviet Red Army Monument, Harbin
Soviet Red Army Monument, Harbin

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section (reproduced on the right) on the Main Page.

Instructions

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Using a DYK suggestion string (see below examples), list new suggestions in the candidate entries section below under the date the article was created or the expansion began (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. Any user may nominate a DYK suggestion; self-nominations are permitted and encouraged. Thanks for participating and please remember to check back for comments on your nomination.

DYK criteria

Official criteria: DYK rules
Unofficial criteria: LaPella's unwritten rules
  • DYK evaluation includes:
  • Length - The Article should contain at least 1,500 characters in main body text (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references, lists, and tables). This is a mandatory minimum; in practice, articles having more than 1,500 characters of prose still may be rejected as too short, at the discretion of the selecting administrators.
  • Verification - The DYK hook fact in the article needs an inline cite at the end of the sentence and the article in general should use inline, cited sources.
  • Date - The new article should be no more than five days old and the expanded article should be expanded at least fivefold with new text within the last five days.
  • Length
  • DYK qualifying characters: To count the number of characters in a piece of text, you will need to use a JavaScript extension like User:Dr pda/prosesize.js (instructions on the talk page), a free website like this, or an external software program that has a character-counting feature. For example, if you are using Microsoft Word, select the text from the article page (or, in the case of "Did you know" nominations, this Talk page) – not the edit page containing Wikitext – then copy and paste it into a blank document. Click "Tools" ("Review" in Office 2007), then "Word Count", and note the "Characters (with spaces)" figure. Other word processing programs may have a similar feature. For Mac users, Apple has a Word counter widget available for Mac OS X 10.4 or later. Note: The character counts indicated on "Revision history" pages are not accurate for DYK purposes as they include categories, infoboxes and similar text in articles, and comments and signatures in hooks on this page.
  • Lists: Proposed lists need 1,500+ characters of prose text. The listed items themselves are not counted as part the the 1,500 DYK qualifying characters
  • Verification
  • Suggested facts (the 'hook') should be:
    1. interesting to draw in a variety of readers,
    2. short and concise (fewer than about 200 characters, including spaces),
    3. neutral,
    4. definite facts that are mentioned in the article, and
    5. always cited in the article with an inline citation.
  • Please note that hooks are subject without notice to copyediting as they move to the main page. The nature of the DYK process makes it impractical to consult users over every such edit. In particular, hooks will be shortened if they are deemed too long: the 200-character limit is an outside limit, not a recommended length. Also, watch the suggestions page to ensure that no issues have been raised about your hook, because if you do not respond to issues raised your hook may not be featured at all.
  • Articles on living individuals must be carefully checked to ensure that no unsourced or poorly sourced negative material is included. Articles and hooks which focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided.
  • Other issues
  • Pictures: Pictures accompanying the DYK hook should be:
    1. freely licensed suitably and freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) because the main page can only have freely licensed pictures;
    2. suitable, attractive, and interesting at a 100x100px-wide resolution;
    3. already in the article; and
    4. relevant to the article.
  • Sounds: Sounds accompanying the DYK hook should have similar qualities to pictures, and should be formatted using {{DYK Listen|filename.ogg|Brief description}}

Sample DYK suggestion strings

Please use one of the strings below to post your DYK nomination, using the "author" and "nominator" fields to identify the users who should receive credit for their contributions if the hook is featured on the main page.

  1. Nom without image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= }}
  2. Nom with image: {{subst:NewDYKnom | article= | hook=... that ? | author= | image= | caption= }}
    To include more than one new or expanded article in a single hook: |article2= |article3= |article4= | (etc)
    To include more than one author: |author2= |author3= | (etc)
    To include alternate hooks: |ALT1= |ALT2= | (etc)
    To add a comment: |comment=
    To add the article you reviewed: |reviewed=

Do not wikilink the article title, or the author username field; the template will wikilink them automatically. Do wikilink the article title in the hook field, however.
Do not add a section heading if you are using the template; the template will add one for you.
Do not include a signature (~~~~) after the template.
Do not use non-free images in your hook suggestion.

An example of how to use the template is given below:

{{subst:DYKsug
 | article   = Example
 | hook      = ... that this [[article]] is an '''[[example]]''' ''(pictured)''?
 | creator   = Jimbo Wales
 | expander  = 
 | nominator =
 | image     = Example.png
 | comment   =
}}
  • Note that you should only use one of the above templates for the original hook. If you want to suggest a second, alternative hook for the same article submission, just type it in manually. The above templates output useful code for each submission and if you employ them for alternative hooks, you will mess up the page formatting.
  • When saving your suggestion, please add the name of the suggested article to your edit summary.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed.
  • If you nominate someone else's article, you can use {{subst:DYKNom}} to notify them. Usage: {{subst:DYKNom|Article name|August 4}} Thanks, ~~~~

Symbols

If you want to confirm that an article is ready to be placed on a later update, or that there is an issue with the article or hook, you may use the following symbols (optional) to point the issues out:

Symbol Code DYK Ready? Description
{{subst:DYKtick}} Yes No problems, ready for DYK
{{subst:DYKtickAGF}} Yes Article is ready for DYK, with a foreign-language or offline hook reference accepted in good faith
{{subst:DYK?}} Query DYK eligibility requires that an issue be addressed. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYK?no}} Maybe DYK eligibility requires some additional work. Notify nominator with {{subst:DYKproblem|Article}}
{{subst:DYKno}} No Article is either completely ineligible, or else requires considerable work before becoming eligible

Please consider using {{subst:DYKproblem}} on the user's talk page, in case they do not notice if there is an issue.

Current Hook Stats

Count of DYK Hooks
Section # of Hooks # Verified
May 30 1 1
June 2 1 1
June 3 1
June 13 1
June 14 1 1
June 15 2 1
June 17 1
June 20 1 1
June 21 1
June 22 2
June 23 3
June 24 2
June 25 1
June 26 4 1
June 27 1
June 28 5 1
June 29 1
June 30 1
July 1 4 1
July 2 1 1
July 3 5 3
July 4 5 2
July 5 7 2
July 6 5 4
July 7 4 2
July 8 6 2
July 9 5 3
July 10 8 6
July 11 7 6
July 12 7 5
July 13 11 5
July 14 9 5
July 15 8 4
July 16 12 11
July 17 10 5
July 18 6 4
July 19 13 9
July 20 4 3
July 21 11 5
July 22 8 5
July 23 9 7
July 24 9 3
July 25 18 2
July 26 7 3
July 27 10 2
July 28 18 7
July 29 9 2
July 30 6 2
July 31 7 4
August 1 4 1
August 2 5 2
August 3
August 4
Total 288 135
Last updated 02:57, 4 August 2024 UTC
Current time is 03:32, 4 August 2024 UTC [refresh]

Next update

The next update will be produced from queue 3.

There are five queues;

Backlogged?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template. See the page Wikipedia:Did you know/Admins for a list of administrators who have volunteered to help with this project.

Where is my hook?

If you can't find the hook you submitted to this page, in most cases it means your article has been approved and is in the queue for display on the main page. You can check whether your hook has been moved to the queue by reviewing the queue listings at the bottom of this page.

If your hook is not in the queue or already on the main page, it has probably been deleted. Deletion occurs if the hook is more than about eight days old and has unresolved issues for which any discussion has gone stale. If you think your hook has been unfairly deleted, you can query its deletion on the discussion page, but as a general rule deleted hooks will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Candidate entries

Articles created/expanded on December 27

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:39, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:53, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:01, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 26

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:09, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:31, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

... that the Liberty ship SS Timothy Bloodworth was the first ship to be hit by a V-2 rocket? Article expanded 5x, joint effort by Mjroots and Bellhalla. Nom by Mjroots (talk) 21:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 21:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:14, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:11, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:12, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 14:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:47, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Not sure how you came to that conclusion MacGyverMagic, but here is the link to the original image from Geograph. Yes, the image indeed is from Ceredigion, Wales, UK. The image was properly loaded into WikiCommons for use on the article. Please state if you need further clarification? Regards. ~Geaugagrrl talk 06:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I believe MacGyverMagic meant that it's obviously not the entire UK being pictured, as in a satellite photo of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Therefore, he suggests "Cors Canon (pictured)" instead of "United Kingdom (pictured)". Art LaPella (talk) 07:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:15, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:48, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:18, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:25, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:59, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 25

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:20, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 12:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:29, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

So it is - how did it manage that so quickly? I will take credit also on this one, as I wrote most of the article as it stands. Johnbod (talk) 17:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
How? Well, it was nominated the day before and was approved for use on DYK about 14 hours before you started typing there. I added Wetman as a contributor before it was moved to the DYK queue. I didn't see your edits at that time, or I would've added your name, too. --PFHLai (talk) 20:27, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:22, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

  • ALT1: ... that Poet's Daffodil (pictured) is a source for Narcissus oil, one of the most popular fragrances used in high quality perfumes?
  • I think the alternate hook is more clearly supported by the reference, which says that Narcissus oil is obtained "most notably" from this and 3 other Narcissi; that the oil "is one of the most popular fragrances used in perfumery"; and that it's "one of the principal ingredients in about 11% of all modern quality perfumes". I suppose the "high quality" could arguably be removed from the hook. This is all in the reference, in the paragraph just above the one that begins with "Narcissus poeticus....". I'll also add a bit more to the article in the next few days. First Light (talk) 04:09, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've expanded the article to include more early references to the flower, Linnaeus' naming of it, this variety's connection to the Greek hero Narcissus, and a couple sentences on hybrids. First Light (talk) 05:24, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Another hook that highlights the legend of Narcissus, which some people may find more interesting. First Light (talk) 20:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:20, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:37, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

It is there already, this citation also helps..

Cannabinoids - Google Books Result Will look for more citations. Do articles need rewrite?SriMesh | talk 10:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:47, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 24

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion 19:43, 26 December 2008

That's fine with me. --Al Ameer son (talk) 22:19, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:32, 26 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:31, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 12:39, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 09:42, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Hook is sourced, but should be expanded to include who dubbed it. I suggest the alt hook:
No probsTaprobanus (talk) 20:26, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:12, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:24, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:42, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:48, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The phrase "may be" indicates this is speculation and after checking with the article I don't think this hook is suitable as the source doesn't support it. I'm trying to find something better.- Mgm|(talk) 23:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 15:56, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited that hook to make it shorter. --Orlady (talk) 19:53, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:37, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • ALT2 is completely unremarkable. The main hook or ALT1 may be remarkable, but there are a few issues: (a) You can't say it was exactly 36 years with only maps (in fact, it could be as little as 23 years given the sources cited), and (b) it reads as if paving was a continuous process, rather than done in spurts. --NE2 22:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Thruxton (talk) 09:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:50, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 06:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion --23prootie (talk) 05:22, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:16, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 23

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:39, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:59, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:02, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:22, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:46, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:00, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Your reference for the 1928 creation is a 1928 map, which only means it was assigned by 1928. Similarly, we know that the new alignment is shown as complete on a 1935 map, which means it was complete by then if PennDOH didn't jump the gun. But its non-presence on the 1934 map means that, if PennDOH never forgot to add a minor realignment, it was opened in either 1934 or 1935. Also, unless the 1934 and 1935 maps are more detailed than the 1930 map, there's no basis for assuming that it used Perryville Road. Finally, this is not interesting. Roads are realigned all the time, and there's no evidence here that this was anything but a normal realignment, built about eight years after the route was designated (and some more years after the road was first added to the state highway system as LR 311). --NE2 21:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Its a bad wording. I guess I am an idiot at this too. I mean construction and paving, not realignments.Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 21:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    It's still extremely common for a route, in the early days of state highway systems, to have not been paved when it was first designated. Maybe you could say something about how it no longer meets its "parent" (better term for that?) due to a truncation that eliminated an overlap? --NE2 21:53, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Little more boring, but fine.Mitch32(Go Syracuse) 14:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:34, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I'm not sure about Wikipedia politics, but it was McChrystal's job to catch terrorists, and most people would consider his success to be a "credit". I don't think the phrase goes out of its way to take sides. Art LaPella (talk) 03:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, catch them, but not kill them. I'm not saying it's not NPOV, I just have a hard time using the word "credit" when taking someone's life. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • While that's his job, this hook implies he went out and killed Zarqawi himself, which is not the case. The article and references confirm that Bush "credited" him with killing Zarqawi, but it just meant he commanded the forces that did, he didn't actually kill anyone, and it has probably been a long time since he did (if he ever did). I think, as is, the hook is too misleading and awkward to use.--IvoShandor (talk) 06:59, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 20:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

OK. We reword it as follows.CeeGee (talk) 20:03, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alt: ... that Turkish female aviator Nezihe Viranyalı was educated in civil aviation at the University of Tennessee following an invitation by the renowned American pilot Jacqueline Cochran?

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:12, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The article looks great, and has several references. But I think the hook is a bit to pessimistic for such an interesting subject. I'd prefer (I'll try to come up with an alt hook, soon) a hook that focuses on how ALA differentiated itself from the established TU centre (for example its attempts to align with anti-war movement or concentrated efforts to organize black workers). --Soman (talk) 10:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1: ... that when the Alliance for Labor Action was formed, the AFL-CIO denounced it as a dual union? - Tim1965 (talk) 15:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT2: ... that Alliance for Labor Action supported universal health care in the late 1960s, boosting efforts to pass federal legislation on the issue? - Tim1965 (talk) 15:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
ALT3: ... that Alliance for Labor Action launched a $4 million organizing drive targeting African American workers in Atlanta, Georgia, in the fall of 1969? - Tim1965 (talk) 15:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
, all alt hooks accepted with offline ref on the basis of WP:AGF. I would endorse all three ALT-hooks, perhaps preferring ALT3. --Soman (talk) 20:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unable to verify first hook. One of the two inline citations gives nothing and the other leads to a subscription-only page. Similar problem with second hook; inline citation leads to the same subscription-only page. Length and rev date are okay. Truthanado (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I think that to be grammatically correct the hook should say anonymously, rather than in anonymity (the second would apply people didn't know him; the first that they didn't know he wrote the book) Other than that, things check out. - Mgm|(talk) 10:54, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Personally, I think the tournament wording is an important part of the hook. I would go with
... that DeShawn Sims is the first Michigan Wolverines men's basketball player to have at least 20 points and at least 20 rebounds in a single game since Phil Hubbard did so in the 1977 NCAA Tournament?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 14:37, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:42, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:41, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I've forgotten most of my undergraduate toxicology, but "dose" and a mass unit like "milligram" don't look right together. You might want to check with a toxicologist about the wording, but I suggest shortening the hook to simply "... that as little as five...?" just to avoid that combo. --PFHLai (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Altered hook, accordingly, I have only had some undergrad chem and organic chem myself, so your suggestion is much appreciated. --IvoShandor (talk) 07:37, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:52, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 01:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:57, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:41, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 22

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The citation for him being arrested is at the end of the paragraph, not immediately after the fact, as required by the rules. Note also that one of the sources, [1], appears to be an advocacy site and may not be reliable for our purpose. Length and date OK.  Sandstein  09:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I shifted two of the refs now, so it's directly after the sentence. As per the PUCL link, I think that it passes within WP:RS. It is used to back the claim that Jwalamukhi had been arrested under the AP Preventive Detention Act 1970, I don't think that claim is controversial. See also [2]. --Soman (talk) 11:05, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:00, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The hook's assertion that production "has increased dramatically in recent years" is not supported by the source provided, [3]. That source says nothing of an increase in production, much less a "dramatic" one.  Sandstein  09:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:09, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:10, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Date, hook length and article expansion check out; the statement has an inline citation at the end but I do not understand cricket statistics and cannot verify the hook properly. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

The country was not known as Benin (but Dahomey) when Maurice was in charge. Did he take the title "President"? The wikipage List of heads of state of Benin didn't say so.
Click on "heads of state" in the hook, and you'll find Kouandété there. How Kouandété's wikibio is fixed is up to Editorofthewiki. --PFHLai (talk) 14:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:54, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

In the "Civil War service" section, in-line citation is provided for "he was brevetted to major general in the Union Army on March 13, in recognition of his performance at Winchester in September 1864." There is no requirement that there must be a reference after each full stop. It is meaningless to duplicate a reference two or more times in the same paragraph, just to make sure each sentence is referenced. For the other two aspects - judge and legislator in the Indiana Senate - I've added in-line citations. Please see the "Postbellum" section. AdjustShift (talk) 13:10, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I've also added an in-line citation in the lead section. AdjustShift (talk) 13:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK now, thanks!  Sandstein  13:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:09, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Take your pick. There's probably loads more but these are the best five in my opinion. (new article, self nom) --➨Candlewicke  :) Sign/Talk 02:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
All good to go. I recommend "... that the Irish TV show Hanging with Hector was criticised ..." if the last hook is chosen.  Sandstein  08:28, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:57, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Two Class AA minor league baseball players attended the same college. Is that the best hook there is?? Also, at 1300 characters, the article isn't long enough to qualify for DYK at this time. Cbl62 (talk) 01:40, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Unfortunately, Cbl62 is right; it's about 1277 characters right now, and the minimum is 1500. Is there any way you can expand it several hundred characters (which is really just a couple sentences) within the next couple days? —Politizer talk/contribs 02:24, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Okayed. Ecoleetage (talk) 04:43, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
... that Nolan Reimold led the Mid-American Conference (MAC) in home runs (20), runs batted in (60), total bases (137), on-base % (.496), and slugging % (.770) throughout the 2005 baseball regular season? I think it needs the season year. Sam Blab 14:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Old Albany Post Road
Old Albany Post Road


Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:01, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

No problems here. 2,132 characters.  Sandstein  08:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expiring noms

Articles created/expanded on December 21

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:24, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

  • ALT2: ... that Phil Ochs' song "Outside of a Small Circle of Friends" was set to a cheerful arrangement despite the fact that it was inspired by a brutal murder? — [[::User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] ([[::User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]] · [[::Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]]) 19:25, 23 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Need to make it clear that the pic is of an "old" Routemaster, perhaps with (old Routemaster pictured) or similar wording. There is an array of pictures here on Commons. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 21:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 02:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)



a 4-crazie stamp from Tuscany, 1851
a 4-crazie stamp from Tuscany, 1851

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Is anyone interested in making this a double-DYK hook? That lion statue may deserve its own article. --PFHLai (talk) 11:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done: see Marzocco. how about "... that when Tuscany issued its first postage stamps (example pictured) in 1851, Donatello's heraldic Marzocco of Florence was featured?"-Wetman (talk) 18:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whoa! So fast! I was thinking of doing this tomorrow! Thank you, Wetman. BTW, I'm adding a link to "Florence" to your double-hook. --PFHLai (talk) 23:02, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Second hook OK too.  Sandstein  12:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC) AGF verification for off-line source. Ecoleetage (talk) 04:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that when computer scientists and others treat questions such as "Would you like chicken or roast beef for dinner?" as yes-no questions they are exploiting a real linguistic ambiguity in such questions?

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • For DYK purposes, we rarely accept instances where a single reference "covers" an entire paragraph; we require that there be an inline citation next to each fact. For example, in the paragraph you and I are looking at in this article, the content of that footnote is ambiguous: it's at the very end of the paragraph, so a reader doesn't know if it's "covering" the whole paragraph or just the comment "Such questions are labelled declarative questions, and are also available as an option in those languages that have other ways of asking yes-no questions" (or, for that matter, the comment about intonation in Jakaltek). These referencing issues are exacerbated more, even, in cases like this, where the references are offline books so the reader can't easily check for himself to see what's in there. Therefore, a hook talking about the cross-linguistic variation or listing examples of other languages would not be accepted right now, with the reference the way it is; there would have to be separate inline citations for each example given in that paragraph (even if all the inline citations are all to the same source). —Politizer talk/contribs 21:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then it's your own self-imposed loss. You make daft hoops to jump through, that actually make articles look terrible, and you'll end up with no-one jumping through those hoops. Such overlinking is patently unnecessary for actual readers, who don't need umpteen links to the same citation in a single paragraph. If DYK (or, more properly, the individual people at DYK such as you) require such silliness, then that is simply bureaucracy, rather than anything aimed at making a good article. You'll find plenty of discussion about this dotted around Wikipedia on people's talk pages and elsewhere, where it has been repeated time and again that one doesn't need a link to a citation on every sentence, and that it is a quite reasonable and normal idea that links to citations at the end of a paragraph cover that entire paragraph. I suggest that you start with Wikipedia talk:Footnotes/Archive 4#Every sentence should have a reference?, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ailanthus altissima, the several times this is listed at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources/Archive Index, and this. Your bureaucracy here isn't to the betterment of the actual Wikipedia articles themselves. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (talk) 22:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • As you wish. All I'm saying is, when you have a paragraph like that and then a single book reference at the end, if I as the reader don't have access to the book then I have no idea whether it's 5 (or however many) sentences all covered by one reference, or 4 bits of unreferenced OR followed by one other sentence that happens to have a reference. —Politizer talk/contribs 22:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • DYK requires that the DYK hook be inline cited in the article for the article to appear on the Main Page. The inline discussions mentioned above likely do not address the circumstances where the article will be linked from the Main Page, which receives 3,000,000+ hits a day. -- Suntag 04:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Generally when I use a single source for an entire paragraph I just note that this is the case in citation itself, I did something like that on 1st Gas Regiment. I am inclined to agree that if the fact is easily verifiable and the submitting editor goes that extra length to make sure a reader knows that the entire graf is cited to that one source then it really shouldn't be a problem for DYK purposes.--IvoShandor (talk) 05:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with you, but in this case the fact isn't easily verifiable; the paragraph is a list of several examples, which in theory could come from anywhere, and the reference at the end of the paragraph is an offline source so most readers have no way to check. —Politizer talk/contribs 05:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • A simple solution is a note in the citation that it is for all examples. Offline really hasn't a thing to do with it, as most readers in the western world would have easy access to a local or university library, while its not as easily verifiable (being offline), it's still not difficult. If a citation is truly redundant there isn't much of a point in demanding multiple cites, especially if it could easily be solved with a note in the actual citation itself, as I did on the gas regiment article. Just my thoughts. --IvoShandor (talk) 06:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC) Not that I even think this is that big of a deal or anything, if it were me I would just add the citation, because who cares? It's Wikipedia, but if we can make it easier for nominators, we should.--IvoShandor (talk) 06:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • As near as I can tell, the hook doesn't come from the Cruttenden supported paragraph. It comes from Greg W. Scragg (1996). Problem Solving with Computers.[4] Since the source was presented in the article as off line, Jonathan could have made the hook a little easier to verify through the wording in the article text. -- Suntag 07:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think Jonathan took your above 21:43, 21 December 2008 post to mean that DYK wouldn't accept the original hook unless Jonathan added an inline reference on the end of each sentence in the Cruttenden supported paragraph. It looks like this thread resulted from a missundersdanding. (It would really be ironic if the missundersdanding were from a linguistic ambiguity.). -- Suntag 13:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I located the "chicken or roast beef for dinner" quote in this source. The hook should be revised to say something like "when computer scientists and others intentionally treat". The phrase "linguistic ambiguity" should appear some place in the article. The idea that "all" computer scientist are "exploiting" the ambiguity when they treat the question as a yes-no question is based on author Greg W. Scragg's opinion about computer scientist. However, it is presented as a fact in the hook. -- Suntag 07:16, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]



Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 10:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

And some alternate hook ideas, someone else may have a better one:

--IvoShandor (talk) 10:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Note sour plums, licorice root, and sweet osmanthus are in the Rocky Li reference; sugar and rose petals in the Li-chʻên Tun. Different sources seem to refer to the plums as "sour plums," "smoked plums," or "sour prunes," but AFAIK it's all pretty much the same thing. —Politizer talk/contribs 07:35, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FAST-TRACKED for #DYKs for December holidays other than December 25, 2008 holidays? Suanmeitang is a popular drink at Hot pot, which is a popular format of a Reunion dinner on Dongzhi Festival, which is TODAY. --PFHLai (talk) 13:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seems good to me. Can we work that into the hook? Shimgray | talk | 13:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Re BorgQueen, suanmeitang is not a brand name, but just what the drink is called (like saying "orange juice" in English)...I don't know if that makes a difference or not. Re PFHLai: I don't have a problem if you fast-track it...I never knew it was drunk at hot pot places (in my experience, I would always get it at one of those nasty yanjiu shops when it's super-hot out, and drink it while I'm walking around or riding the bus)...if you can think of an ALT that works that in I'll take a look.Politizer talk/contribs 15:20, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder if it's a HK/Canada phenomenom. I have no refs for the popularity of suanmeitang at hot pots (hence no hook for fast-tracking), but I look forward to having some suanmeitang tonight. Oh, well... Happy Winter Solstice, everyone. Cheers! --PFHLai (talk) 20:53, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm jealous...I was getting seriously thirsty writing this article. Have a good one! —Politizer talk/contribs 21:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Length, date and hook OK.  Sandstein  12:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:58, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Article length and date check out. Hook length also checks out, although it is on the long side at 196 characters. Note that ref 4 needs a subscription to be able to be read in its entirety. Also, are you sure that it is the Upper East Side? The free article only says "East Side". Shouldn't there be a mention in the article that Colt Industires was "a firm founded in 1836 by Samuel Colt"? Forgive my ignorant pickiness, Dabomb87 (talk) 16:07, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... that the stems of Asclepias cordifolia, or Heart-leaf milkweed, were made into rope and string by the Native American Miwok and used for skirts and capes? (5X expansion, Self-Nom)

Here are online Google book links to verify the references, for the first hook[5] and the second.[6] First Light (talk) 03:41, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 15:58, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 20

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:12, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:30, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:23, 21 December 2008 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 23:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:19, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • It occurs to me just now that the Siege of Bastogne took place over Christmas 1944, so if someone wants quasi-seasonal filler for the 24th or 25th this might well work, with an appropriate comment in the hook. Shimgray | talk | 16:54, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 23:13, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Text at cite 2 says "When they overpowered the San Diego Padres in the World Series, they matched the '27 Yankees of Babe Ruth and the '55 Dodgers of Jackie Robinson to become just the third team in major-league history to lead wire-to-wire and also win the World Series." Inline cite 3 on line containing hook appears to cite the book itself, not an independent source. - Dravecky (talk) 05:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've clarified the hook by substituting American League for Major League. The book does say they were the first team since the 1927 Yankees to lead wire to wire, but I've limited the assertion to the American League (Dodgers are National League) to make sure it's accurate. Cbl62 (talk) 07:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:29, 20 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 21:06, 20 December 2008 (UTC)



Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Hook okay (fixed typo in "Guinness") and ref checks out but article needs cleanup to fix numerous typos and grammar errors, expansion is close enough to 5x for me but a more precise check is in order. - Dravecky (talk) 05:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the comment. The article was expanded from this to now. The expansion as per my calculations on MS Word is as follows:
Words - earlier 665 - now 3,445
Characters (no space)- earlier 3,419 - now 18,286
Characters (with space) - earlier 4,073 - now 21,668
The size of the article earlier 7,322 and now it is 38,889. The calculation in MS Word may differ if you include the numerous templates the article had earlier. I will look into the typos. Cheers Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 07:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • But there are still serious issues, not the least of which being the lack of references in the articlein general (there are only two references to anything other than the case itself) and the specifically the lack of a source for this fact. —Politizer talk/contribs 23:16, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There is a source for it, at the end of the third paragraph: the Australian Human Rights Commission website. Exploding Boy (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • But that source isn't presented in a context saying the laws repealed were the last sodomy laws in Australia. That information might be in the source (might because I haven't taken the time to read the entire thing), but it has to be presented in the article as well. —Politizer talk/contribs 01:32, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Article says "Fanning admitted that he did no work on the show" which while this phrase can be sourced it cannot be taken literally as he was the presenter. Fanning is quoted as saying "hardly even kn[e]w where the 2TV office [wa]s, and that's God's honest truth" and there's a long way from "hardly even" to "didn't even" as, again, Fanning is speaking colloquially, not literally. - Dravecky (talk) 04:37, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The article is very good and meets all our standards (the only minor thing it needs is work on the lead-in, which I mentioned at the talk page). But this hook seems a little dry. Are there any crazy little facts or anything that you could suggest as an alternate hook? —Politizer talk/contribs 23:22, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's not the most exciting subject ever. How about:
  • ALT1: ... that the sovereignty of Canada has become an increasingly relevant issue in recent years as Arctic ice in Northern Canada has melted?
or something along those lines. I never was great at grammar. Oh, and I'm working on the intro right now. Bsimmons666 (talk) Friend? 17:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I verified this a moment ago, but I just realized we will have to check it a little more closely...since it was originally made mostly by combining other articles, I think we'll have to see how much of it really is "new" content. I'll try to take a look sometime soon, but if any other reviewers are reading this it would also help to have a second opinion, as always. —Politizer talk/contribs 06:43, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:41, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 14:18, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Please be reminded that DYK articles must be at least 1500 characters long to qualify. You need about 200 more in Autonomous Agrarian Union. Happy typing! :-) --PFHLai (talk) 22:32, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Impressive job of expanding the article (from about 550 text characters to over 4,000, not including spaces). I prefer the second hook. Hook fact sources are not of the highest reliability, but there are multiple independent online sources supporting this fact, so I think it's good to go. --Orlady (talk) 16:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 08:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

So it's a bestseller. A lot of books are. We need something a bit more oomph-y (and I know, there's not a lot to work with here). Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 11:07, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Length and history verified; registration-requiring Norwegian ref accepted IGF. Daniel Case (talk) 17:42, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Length and history verified; offline ref accepted IGF. Daniel Case (talk) 17:40, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:24, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Length and history verified; Polish-language ref accepted IGF. Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • That doesn't still quite match. The word "liberal" is used in the hook, but not in the article. The article says that it "had the most local autonomy", which is not the same thing. With that in the hook, it would work.  Sandstein  15:57, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:23, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

  • The ref (online) preceding the hook and giving exact numbers for the Russian partition in fact gives numbers for all three partition in that para. It doesn't say that Russian was the largest, but the numbers are few, clear and simple. I have indicated this in the article now. A ref for "Russian partition" plus an entire section to describe the origins of the term, also added. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 15:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:49, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I like ALT2 the best, but it isn't cited where it's stated so there's no way to verify it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I prefer the second, but it could be reworded considering he probably didn't write it in the shower. BTW, source is a 25 min. podcast so good faith is probably the go. :) —97198 (talk) 08:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on December 19

Template:DYKsuggestion at 17:08, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:58, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Could we have a hook about something about him, or something he did, not just who his grandfather was? Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree with you that the hook should focus on him, but after looking at the article I can't find a single interesting thing in there—the guy is notable and everything, but not very interesting (as far as I can tell from the article). This hook is probably the best we can do (I would replace "Christopher Gadsden, the designer of the Gadsden flag" with "the man who designed the Gadsden flag" to take a tiny bit of the attention off the grandfather)...unless the article gets expanded soon, I think we'll just have to choose between using the grandfather hook or just not passing it. —Politizer talk/contribs 04:56, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:05, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Looks like Johnbod. I've added his name as creator. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:19, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Sorry! Johnbod (talk) 21:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good article, but the hook's assertion that "no one work is universally accepted as his" is not in the article. It should be put in the lead and cited.  Sandstein  14:34, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Malouel's oeuvre on panel remains controversial; the most generally accepted work of his to survive is the Pietá tondo in the Louvre, the first true tondo of the Renaissance, though this is not accepted by Châtelet.[8]" seems pretty clear, and the following para adds more. Although Châtelet was a leading scholar of the period, his remains a minority view & I don't think it should go in the lead. Malouel's other surviving work, apart from panels, is painting sculptures by others, which is not "paintings". Johnbod (talk) 15:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, saying "the most generally accepted work of his to survive is X" is not exactly the same thing as "no one work is universally accepted as his", but I think it will do dor DYK purposes. Maybe you should change "work" to "painting", because painting statues is also a work of art.  Sandstein  16:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you mean in the hook, the hook is restricted to "paintings", which excludes the painted sculptures, and it would repeat the word too soon I think. I'd say "panels" but that might be confusing. I'll change it in the article. Johnbod (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 19:52, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 06:38, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Is this an appropriate subject for the main page? I don't think so myself, but I am willing to accept that views may be different on this. Still, this should be discussed. --Nlu (talk) 14:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I thought about that before nominating the article. I am personally opposed to suicide or assisted suicide except in the most extreme situations and recognize this is a topic on which people have strongly differing viewpoints. However, Ratel has put together a well-written and well-researched article on an inportant topic of public debate that is not done in a expolitative way. So I thought it worthy of a DYK nomination. On reflection, the hook may be interpreted by some as having a promotional tone, which I did not intend. If someone wants to propose an alternative hook for this, feel free. Cbl62 (talk) 14:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • DYKs hooks shouldn't be put in a negative way, but this hook is simply telling where they are marketed from. If the hook was something like... oh... I don't know... "... that suicide bags are used to assist people in committing suicide?" (I don;t even know if that is true since I didn't thoroughly read through the article)... then that would be negative. This hook seems fine. I'm open to anyone who disagrees... – RyanCross (talk) 01:53, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To say that this article is an endorsement of suicide is to say that articles about war represent an endorsement of military conflict. Ecoleetage (talk) 02:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where did I (or anyone else) say that this is an endorsement of suicide? But while articles on sexual behavior do not represent an endorsement to engage in such behaviors, sexually-related articles are, while not prohibited, still generally avoided on the main page. I do believe this article presents a problem; whether that problem is big enough to prevent it from being a DYK article is the question. --Nlu (talk) 22:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is important to consider that suicide is illegal in most countries. Of course many people think it should not be, but that's another question. Steve Dufour (talk) 07:55, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The "illegal" part doesn't bother me so much. Murder and marijuana use are also illegal in most places, but we regularly feature hooks on cannabis and murder. So long as it's not perceived as advocacy of the position, I'm ok with it. Cbl62 (talk) 16:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think the main page would feature an article on, say, a burglery tool.Steve Dufour (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The hook seems creepy to me, mostly because it comes across as an advertising blurb (compare "Did you know that Sony plasma TVs are marketed by Sears and Circuit City?"), but additionally because the product it advertises is one that might appeal to unstable people. A different hook is needed. --Orlady (talk) 17:05, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At least I didn't nominate it as a Christmas hook. Cbl62 (talk) 23:07, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, though, I noted my reservations to the subject at the outset, but if the initial hook is found to be creepy, I'm not sure what hook about this subject would not be found creepy. A hook describing the design or mechanics of how it works would likely be found even creepier. Cbl62 (talk) 23:13, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I like ALT2 because it avoids most of the problems people have brought up...but it's not sourced right now. If someone can provide a reference for it quickly, I would be in favor of using that hook. If not...I guess we can go with the hook that Chamal verified. —Politizer talk/contribs 03:08, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 06:20, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 05:27, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Length and history verified; offline ref accepted IGF. Reworded for clarity. Daniel Case (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:24, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Correction made

Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:58, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles created/expanded on December 18

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

So a commission is created and given something to do. That's not a catchy hook. I realize this comes from the slush pile of current-events articles that didn't make ITN, but as a former/not really former journalist I know you need a catchy lede, and our hook should focus on the corruption aspect. Something like:
ALT1 ... that the Konovalyuk Commission has claimed that Ukraine's arms sales to Georgia before and during the 2008 South Ossetia War adversely affected the country's defense capabilities? Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The "catchiness" of my proposed hook stems not from a commission that is given something to do but from Ukraine's (alleged) involvement in the conflict. Note that this is a highly controversial commission, so I did not want the hook to mention its findings, as they are fiercely denied by the Ukrainian government. Thus, a hook that only mentions one side of the argument might not be in line with NPOV. Óðinn (talk) 23:45, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, I changed the hook so it reflects that this is the commission's claim. Daniel Case (talk) 16:40, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also, most of the sales are thought to have occurred prior to the war... Óðinn (talk) 17:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that should work.Óðinn (talk) 05:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ref #4 as a primary source (in the beginning of the investigation and findings paragraph). Ref #2 as an English source as well. Óðinn (talk) 17:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Those refs don't support the ALT hook. Specifically, the place where there needs to be a reference is at the end of the sentence beginning "The report also claims that some weapons exports were conducted in a manner detrimental to Ukraine's defence:" (I've marked it with a {{fact}} tag to make it easier to find). —Politizer talk/contribs 17:14, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
<=============
Added.Óðinn (talk) 17:45, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion Cavila (talk) 10:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"bad press"? Even if someone threw a printer into the time tunnel, I doubt there was enough suitable ink or any experienced operators at that time in Norway to get the "press" going. --74.14.21.52 (talk) 16:17, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the expression is also popularly used to sum up any kind of negative coverage in written sources or otherwise, not necessarily newspapers and other mass media. But if it makes people giggly for all the wrong reasons, then perhaps the more neutral word 'publicity' will be more appropriate. What about:

... that King Cnut's first bedfellow was Ælfgifu of Northampton, whose political roles in England and Norway excited hostile publicity? Cavila (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 00:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: The author is continuing to expand the article to hopefully meet the 5x requirement – I'm leaving this entry here for at least a couple more days to give the nominator some time to work on it. JamieS93 04:04, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Request for Review': I have recently expanded the article further. Please review this article's recent expansions and efforts to meet the DYK length concerns. If it does not meet the length concerns, I will gladly continue my efforts.Sirkevinalot (talk) 23:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:02, 19 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 04:14, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Length and history verified; offline ref accepted IGF. Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion at 22:18, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

  • ALT1 ... that Itzamnaaj K'awiil, king of the Classic Period Maya city of Dos Pilas in Guatemala, was so embarrassed about being born in exile that the calendar dates recording his birth were altered?
  • ALT2 ... that B'alaj Chan K’awiil, the Classic Period Maya king of Dos Pilas in Guatemala, dramatically switched sides to become the vassal of his long standing enemy after 20 years of loyal service?
I hate to say this despite such a lot of work being poured into this very well-done article, but ... based on the byte count alone it hasn't been expanded enough. If there's someone willing and able to compare the text size, would they be willing to see if it makes it under that standard? Daniel Case (talk) 20:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Based on prose text alone as per unwritten rules, excluding headings, references etc. etc. I have expanded this article more than the 5x required, if someone can check it.
  • Unfortunately, for the next week or two I have extremely limited internet access so can't check back here as regularly as I would like, so if anything needs changing in the hooks, go ahead and change it... Simon Burchell (talk) 15:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yep, the expansion is good, and the article appears to meet all the standards. But I don't really like any of the hooks (the two ALTS are about the kings rather than the city itself, and the first hook sounds too abstract). —Politizer talk/contribs 02:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • ALT3... that a principal work of mathematician Wilhelm Cauer was twice destroyed during World War Two and was only published after his death by his family who reconstructed it from the table of contents?
  • References good for all three hooks (offline, accepted in good faith). I prefer the original, and then ALT2, and ALT1 the least, although they're all acceptable (I just think the referencing for the others is more robust). The person promoting this nom to Next may choose. —Politizer talk/contribs 02:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:21, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

  • Date and 5x+ expansion verified. Not a very hooky hook, but OK. A combination of an on-line (for the government post) and off-line (for having been the mayor) refs accepted. Nsk92 (talk) 14:23, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Template:DYKsuggestion Cbl62 (talk) 03:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I added two additional references for the connection between Freedom House and Operation Exodus, both of which were founded by the same person. As for the Activities section "bugging" you, it's hard to respond without more specific input. Cbl62 (talk) 07:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on December 17

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Have tried to address some of the cleanup issues with the entry.Dgabbard (talk) 04:30, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Added an additional reference to the article quoting from the doumentary that used footage of Ringer and showcased his photos that sums up his significance. Hope that provides more verification as requested. Dgabbard (talk) 23:05, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 23:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 18:12, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Length, reference and history verified. Daniel Case (talk) 16:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The hook misrepresents the situation. It states that the program somehow reduces the value of the home, when all it does is reduce the portion of the home's value that is subject to property taxation. --Orlady (talk) 21:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then ALT1 ... that New York State offers a school tax rebate program that offsets the tax burden on homeowners by lowering the portion of a home's value that is subject to property tax? —Politizer talk/contribs 02:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]




Articles created/expanded on December 16

Template:DYKsuggestion at 13:49, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I don't have a problem with the article itself, as it does seem to have plenty of reliable sources asserting that people do really study this stuff...but I agree with your concerns about the neologism thing; those sources verify that people study this, but not that it's a recognized "field," which is what the hook suggests. Therefore, I think the article is eligible and just needs a new hook. I can't make any guarantees about thinking of one myself, as my activity is very sporadic right now and soon I'll probably be inactive for a week or so. —Politizer talk/contribs 02:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:11, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

  • I almost made this same comment yesterday. I agree with Sherurcij; this hook is obviously meant as veiled criticism of the person. Combined with the problems in the article itself, I would strongly recommend removing this nom if it doesn't get improved within 24 hours (and by "improved" I someone other than me cleaning up the refs and any other problems in the article, and someone suggesting a new hook). —Politizer talk/contribs 00:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles created/expanded on December 15

Template:DYKsuggestion at 16:41, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Notes 4 (which had a note interpolated) and 15 cover these points. Both are online, though 15 is in French. Johnbod (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]




  1. ... that Charles Edmond Knox (pictured) chased the elusive Boer General Christiaan de Wet eight hundred miles, but never caught him?
  2. ... that James Henthorn Todd said of Archbishop Robert Knox that he was "...very foolish, without learning, piety, judgment, conduct, sense?" Strawless (talk) 03:41, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I think it's possible to do a still-interesting double hook and focus on an interesting fact about just one of them. For example, here is a template for how it might go (I can't for real suggest a hook yet, since I haven't read the articles closely):
ALT *example ... that Archbishop Robert Knox, father of Lieutenant-General Sir Charles Edmond Knox, founded the Belfast Church Extension Society? (not sure if it's "something awesome" but it fits the bill. Mjroots (talk) 07:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYKs for December holidays other than December 25, 2008 holidays

Note: As we did at Halloween, we are "breaking the rules" (including the unwritten ones) in that these articles were prepared in under 5 days but are being delayed. Post your DYK suggestions here on topics related to holidays of this season that are not listed at December 25 Holidays.

Suggestions:

File:Imag0005.jpg
  • Two issues:
    1. LENGTH. This does not appear to be a 5x expansion (based on an eyeball estimate; I haven't counted characters).
    2. HOOK FACT. Verification of the hook fact requires the reader to do their own arithmetic to determine the difference in sizes, based on the reported 122 x 59 ft dimensions for the Rockefeller Center rink. Furthermore, I notice that http://www.ppgplace.com/rink.shtml gives the PPG rink's dimensions as 104 x 104 ft, which is more than the 9600 ft2 number given in the article (based on a different source). Revise the article so that it walks the reader through the story behind the hook fact. For example: "At 104 ft on each side (10,016 ft2), the square rink is more than 2800 ft2 larger than Rockefeller Center's 122- x 59-ft rink." --Orlady (talk) 22:16, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Character count has gone from 1619 to 4505 so far. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 12:38, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Year's Eve

  • Comment Since Champagne is a big part of New Years Eve celebrations, I've been working on several Champagne/sparkling wine related articles for DYK. My goal is to try and get one related hook on each set that runs throughout Dec. 31st (I'll have more suggestions coming over the next week or so). I would understand if there are constraints with other hooks needing to be featured. Normally wine articles don't fit into our DYK "theme days" like Halloween/Christmas, etc so I thought I would have fun with this one. :) AgneCheese/Wine 06:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • This seems an appropriate request and seems do able. Once it is determined which queue will post at 18:00 to 24:00 (UTC), then your three other hooks can be posted to the queues that follow that one. -- Suntag 13:39, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:57, 21 December 2008 (UTC)


Template:DYKsuggestion at 07:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Template:DYKsuggestion at 03:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

  • References for hook include the Oxford ref in the lead and the Johnson Vintage ref under the "Early history" section. Feel free to propose an alt if you see something more eye catching in the article. -- AgneCheese/Wine 03:34, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • None of the sentences containing "pink" had an in line citation, so the hook can't be verified at present. Also, which sentence in the article supports the idea that "for most of its history, Champagne was pinkish"? -- Suntag 13:30, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The "most of its history" part is a summarization of the entire article which talks about the evolution of wine in Champagne and the relatively recent phenomenon of white sparkling wine. Essentially every reference used in the article give verification to that summary. The main part of the hook comes from the very first line of the lead which is sourced to the Oxford ref (currently footnote #1) as noted and the second to last sentence of the third paragraph in "Early history" to the Johnson Vintage ref (currently footnote #2). When I write articles I ensure that everything is sourced. When the entire paragraph is sourced to the same reference, it is redundant to add the same footnote to every other line. Hence the reason I point you in the direction of where the refs are. Besides, all my sources are offline anyways and so it is going to get an AGF tick. There is even less reason to add redundant duplicate footnotes for that. AgneCheese/Wine 17:10, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Looks fine to me. Gatoclass (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article doesn't seem to say anything about "that for most of its history, Champagne (pictured) was pinkish and non-sparkling". I asked for the inline ref in case I'm wrong and it is standard typically applied on this DYK page. WP:OR states "Synthesis occurs when an editor puts together multiple sources to reach a novel conclusion that is not in any of the sources". While it may be true that the change from 5th century pinkish Champagne in the 17th century (or when ever) may mean that "for most of its history, Champagne (pictured) was pinkish," without such information being source to a reliable source, I don't think it appropriate to include such information on the Main Page as a Wikipedian editor summarization of the entire article. -- Suntag 17:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think that is a rather bizarre injection of OR synthesis. If published sources are saying that a region has been making still pinkish wine for roughly 1300 years compared to the 200 years that sparkling white has been popular, it is fair to say that those sources view Champagne as a being a still pink wine for "most of its history". OR synthesis would be if I try to create an entirely "new thought" from among the sources, not if I regurgitate what was it is already published in the sources, just phrasing it differently. There is no "new thought" being put forth here. But for appeasement, I added the redundant "for most of its history" phrase to the lead paragraph for you. AgneCheese/Wine 18:09, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I think it's clear from the text that for most of its history, champagne was non-sparkling. I admit I didn't pay much attention to the "pinkish" bit. I'll probably have to read it again to satisfy myself that is the case. But I do think Agne could have made the article a little easier to verify. Gatoclass (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that an editor or reader can put together the information in the article to reach the DYK hook conclusion. It still seems to be OR and with so much well sourced information in the article, I don't think we need to use OR on the Main Page. -- Suntag 18:10, 18 December 2008 (UTC) Struck per edit conflict. -- Suntag 18:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
There's a sourced statement which says the region's wine was pinkish until Dom Perignon devised a technique to make white wine from red grapes in the 17th century. Since the article also states that wine has been made in Champagne since Roman times, I can't see much reason to challenge the hook statement. Gatoclass (talk) 08:10, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DYKsuggestion at 06:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)


Queues

Queue 1
T. acutiloba flowers
T. acutiloba flowers


Queue 2


Uniform of Capital Bicycle Club
Uniform of Capital Bicycle Club


Queue 3


Queue 4


Queue 5


6

Caption goes here
Caption goes here
  • ... that ... (pictured) ...
  • ... that ...
  • ... that ...
  • ... that ...
  • ... that ...
  • ... that ...
  • ... that ...
  • ... that ...
  • ... that ...


See also

zh:Wikipedia:新條目推薦/候選