Jump to content

User talk:Dale Arnett

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gficery (talk | contribs) at 14:47, 31 August 2012 (→1903-06 Massillon Tigers / Bob Shiring: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives (dates approximate):

List of Major League Baseball managers

Regarding your changes to the above article: Herzog has not yet been inducted, and your additions create potential for this article to be unstable. It is currently in the middle of a featured list candidacy, so I would ask that you please refrain from making changes of a potentially unstable nature until that time has passed or the induction ceremonies are complete. Thanks. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:14, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Okie dokie. Revert away. However, note that the individual team descriptions need to carefully distinguish between election and induction. For example, the Cardinals have had 13 managers elected to the Hall, but only 12 will have been inducted until the 2010 ceremonies. The problem is that individuals are elected several months before actual induction. It's a known fact that Whitey Herzog will enter the Hall on July 25, 2010 (barring any earth-shattering Pete Rose-style revelations). — Dale Arnett (talk) 01:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • As far as I'm aware, I did check those; if you see any mistakes, please feel free to correct them. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • No mistakes—just an issue of definition. I did find an interesting thing when I looked into the Baseball-reference.com manager lists for each team. Herzog is listed as a Hall of Famer by that site even though he hasn't yet been inducted. The main discrepancy that creates in our article is that the statement that "two Hall of Famers" have managed the Royals is accurate right now, but the underlying reference (the Baseball-reference.com list) includes Herzog as a third Hall member, which he won't be until July 25. — Dale Arnett (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Line-ups in the Six Nations articles?

When did we decide that this was a good idea? I think this ought to be discussed somewhere first, before making such a large-scale addition, especially since adding the line-ups for each game will make the article HUGE! – PeeJay 23:13, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Team lineups removed. The one question I have on this: If it's such a bad idea to have them in a 6N season article, then shouldn't lineups be removed from all articles on each year's June and November Tests? Now that I've thought of it, that's something that really needs to be hashed out on WP RU. — Dale Arnett (talk) 00:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I wasn't going to remove them, as I actually quite like the idea, but I do think it should be discussed. Tbh, I haven't been following rugby articles as much as I used to, mostly because of the Ireland flags issue, so I dunno what the situation is with the June and November Test articles. Basically, my major concern is with the eventual size of the article, since we have 15 matches to do line-ups for, but if the June and November Test articles look OK with the line-ups included, then I don't see why we shouldn't on the Six Nations articles. Nevertheless, we'd better discuss it with the Project. – PeeJay 00:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Tennessee Volunteers women's basketball

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found a number of concerns which you can see at Talk:Tennessee Volunteers women's basketball/GA1. I have immediately de-listed the article as the referencing is so poor. When these issues are fixed the article can be re-nominated at WP:GAN. If you disagree with the reassessment please contest this at WP:GAR. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic terminology

The term "title" was used since the start of the Olympics. If you insist on changing it to "gold", do so for all days. --Nitsansh (talk) 21:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tie break in rugby union European nations cup

According to my calculation, either Portugal or Romania could get level with Russia on 23 points. Does Russia hold the tie-break advantage against both?--Nitsansh (talk) 21:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Russia hold all the tiebreakers. Russia have swept Portugal and have a win and draw with Romania. —Dale Arnett (talk)
OK, I wasn't sure the tie-break is head-to-head. So now it's only the race between Romania and Portugal for 3rd place that remains unsettled...--Nitsansh (talk) 00:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I THOUGHT that was the situation. I looked further, and apparently the IRB's official site doesn't say that Russia are in. In fact, this story specifically states that Russia needed a win to secure their berth in this round. It may be that head-to-head results aren't used in a tiebreaker in the qualifying procvess. I'll remove Russia as a qualified team in the current events portal, and you can handle the other articles. — Dale Arnett (talk) 02:37, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, it turned out I was right all along. The IRB was just slow in updating its own site; it posted Russia's qualification later that day (28 February). The tiebreakers were exactly as I said. All relevant articles, including the current events portal, now correctly list Russia as in. — Dale Arnett (talk) 19:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Fixed Thank you for posting on my talk. I have fixed this error. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:29, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009–10 Kentucky Wildcats women's basketball team on T:TDYK

I'm not going to approve it for DYK myself, since I've been working on related article topics recently. However, FYI, it is at 5x expansion, but the "orphan" tag at the top of the article is a problem. See what you can do about de-orphaning the article and then remove the "orphan" template. Once that's done, it should be good for DYK. cmadler (talk) 14:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Now de-orphaned. I count 7 incoming links, with one more to be added once the postseason bids come in. Potential for a few more because several 2009–10 SEC women's team articles don't have opposing team links added. — Dale Arnett (talk) 18:50, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for updating the WBB tournament pages. Just didn't want you to think it went unnoticed. --SPhilbrickT 12:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conference Standings on 2009–10 NCAA Division I men's basketball season

Dale- Wanted to get your opinion/expertise on something. I get time out errors every time I update CBB season page and have seen others comment taht this happens to them as well. I suspect it may be that the page has gotten too complex with all of the links, templates, etc. Should we cut back the standings or eliminate them? I made an offer to create season pages for each conference after the Final Four, we could house the standings there and just link the season pages from the conference table. What do you think? Rikster2 (talk) 02:22, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm getting the same errors you've been getting. I think you may be on to something with respect to the complexity of the page. You have a good idea when it comes to housing standings on the conference season pages, but it's not enough. I think a couple of other sections could be split off into their own pages—(1) coaching changes and (2) conference champions and honors. Matter of fact, (2) could be an alternate place to put all of the conference standings in a single place, along with housing each conference's standings on its own page. — Dale Arnett (talk) 02:38, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2009–10 Kentucky Wildcats women's basketball team

Updated DYK query On March 18, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2009–10 Kentucky Wildcats women's basketball team, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Happy Dale Arnett's Day!

User:Dale Arnett has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Dale Arnett's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Dale Arnett!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:59, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:59, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jargon of The Rush Limbaugh Show (4th nomination)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jargon of The Rush Limbaugh Show (4th nomination). patsw (talk) 03:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}}) I saw you edited this page and have a high edit count. patsw (talk) 03:34, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

College Football Project request

Hello! You are listed as an active member of the College Football Project! We have a large number of unreferenced biographies of living persons, but it works out to be just two or three articles per active participant. I've divided up the articles that need help and put them in a table on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football/Unreferenced BLPs. Please assist the project by researching and sourcing the articles that have been "assigned" (so to speak) to you.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:45, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Atletico Madrid

I think they are guaranteed a spot in the Europa League because Sevilla qualified for Europe. Kingjeff (talk) 17:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Actually, no. The loser of the Copa del Rey final only gets a Europa League place if the winner qualifies for the Champions League. If the winner qualifies for the Europa League through its league position, the cup winner's place does NOT pass to the defeated finalist, but instead goes to the highest-placed team not already qualified for Europe. What this means:
    • If Sevilla wins the Copa del Rey, Atlético would get the cup winner's place only if Sevilla maintain their current fourth-place position and qualify for the Champions League.
    • If Sevilla finishes fifth, Atlético could not earn the extra Europa League place through La Liga because they can't improve on their ninth-place position.
Hope this helps... — Dale Arnett (talk) 18:20, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation


Eastern Mountain Coal Fields task force 		An invitation to join us!
You're invited to be a part of the Eastern Mountain Coal Fields task force, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Eastern Kentucky Coal Field region of Kentucky. To accept this invitation, click here!

J654567 (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

participation in teh top flight

u need to add one to all those in 2010/11 season not just exeter, otherwise it doens't add up does it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.144.124.248 (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For the improvement to the Kamie Ethridge DYK hook.--SPhilbrickT 20:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with an administrator

Dale, I am having a problem with an administrator, User:Pats1, who is under the impression that project-wide formatting and standards do not apply to WP:NFL, and seems to be engaged in enforcing his own formatting preferences and possible violations of WP:OWN. I would be grateful if you would watch Fred Taylor (American football) and User talk:Pats1. I am tired of having perfectly valid edits reverted because the admin in question did not make them himself. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Southeastern Conference, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --APShinobi My Contribs 01:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, I restored your edit. I was quickly going through recent changes and reverting vandalism and your edit with "KFC Yum!" made my anti-vandal tools throw a fit. I read over it again and realized it was not a vandalization. My mistake, restored your edit. --APShinobi My Contribs 01:53, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Important!!! -- Please pay attention

Dear Mr Arnett,

I am contacting you because you are an admin and involved in various sporting related articles, particularly rugby.

Let's just stick to the pertinent facts here: ohnoitsjamie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has deleted the following articles: 1988/89 Courage League and template:1988/89 Courage League Table, 1990/91 Courage League and template:1990/91 Courage League Table, 1991/92 Courage League and template:1991/92 Courage League Table, 1992/93 Courage League and template:1992/93 Courage League Table, 1993/94 Courage League and template:1993/94 Courage League Table, 1993/94 Courage League and template:1993/94 Courage League Table, 1994/95 Courage League and template:1994/95 Courage League Table, 1995/96 Courage League and template:1995/96 Courage League Table, 1996/97 Courage League and template:1996/97 Courage League Table, Hill, Back, Dallaglio, English top flight rugby union league tables since 1987/88.

I believe such information was not previously available on the internet; I spent considerable time and effort as part of the collaborative wiki in writing up these league tables and leagues from RFU yearbooks.

User:Noq politely asked user:ohnoitsjamie for these articles to be undeleted but he was refused

Ohnoitsjamie has also unilaterally decided to ban me from Wikipedia. This means that I am forced to create new accounts in order to speak to you.

In my very humble opinion, these articles were deleted as part of a concerted, petty, vindictive campaign of intimidation against me.

Could you therefore please review such articles and undelete (unvandalise) them where you consider necessary?

Please note that this message may be vandalised from your talk page. If it is I apologise -- people deserve to know the truth about this vandalism.

Thank you for your attention - your considered attention would be most welcome. Vice Admiral Drake (talk) 20:29, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you could do as user:Noq requests and undelete them and then move them to his user spage that would be useful for the Wikipedia project. Thx. Vice Admiral Drake (talk) 18:02, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The templates were deleted per G5. Creations by a banned or blocked user(s); the above user was blocked for attacks and edit warring, and now repeatedly creates socks and moans about it. Please contact me if you have further questions. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad ohnoitsjamie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has posted here Mr Arnett because I can expose him here much better than when my complaints are censored from his own talk page or other noticeboards. He is hiding behind "G5 bla bla bla" is just an excuse. While I understand that admins might want powers to delete crap that was patent nonsense, blatant vandalism, self promotion, etc, these were legitmate articles legitimately created. He could have done the honourable thing and used his discretion (funny how that link is red btw) but for once recognised good quality work. But no, he chose the dishonourable, petty, vindictive way out which is why I made the reasonable, civil request above.
If ohnoitsjamie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) can come up with a better excuse than "G5 bla bla bla" and explain in detail why those deletions were for the good of Wikipedia (as opposed to just satisfying his petty ego), then people might start listening to him. Unfortunately, I don't think they can.
If you could therefore do as user:Noq requests (now there's a man with a million more honour than some admins I could name), I'm sure Wikipedians of the future would be extremely happy with you. Drake no walky planky (talk) 18:15, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I thought I might offer my input here: While it may seem nonsensical to have an article deleted for no apparently because of something called G5, this is in fact a part of Wikipedia's policies. G5 says that we don't allow banned/blocked users to contribute, and since you are evading your block to continually try to recreate these articles, you are then violating the policy on sock puppetry. The articles were originally deleted after a discussion, whose result was a decision to delete. I hope this may help you better understand what is going on. Brambleclawx 18:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I thank Brambleclawx for his input, but Dale, I'm afraid he's basically missing wrong. OK, there was a decision to delete the perfectly adequate article Hill, Back, Dallaglio at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill, Back, Dallaglio (actually I think the voting was some stacking of votes and other votes were simply misguided but I'll deal with that later -- it's not important that right now). But the articles on the Courage League Division Ones? There was no discussion there. ohnoitsjamie (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) took it upon himself to vandalise those articles, and he still has not tried to explain why, hiding behind bureaucracy. Although the policy is no doubt well intentioned, it does permit in circumstances like this, admins to act basically as bullies to satisfy their own egos. He has not used his discretion. The articles were clearly legitimate had anyone else other than me created them. Indeed as I noted to user:Noq, before I was censored, the French language Wikipedia already has such articles. Yet when they were created in the English language Wikipedia -- these is the English leagues remember, they are vandalised by one of their own admins, who happens to know bugger all about rugby (Canada are easily the worst of the former dominions at rugby, having a record of P4 L4 v NZ, P6 L6 v Aus, P2 L2 v SA, P6 L6 v Eng) and is sticking his nose in where he's not welcome.
Therefore I ask you again to please kindly comply with user:Noq's reasonable request and undelete theese articles. Thx. Ohyesitssirfrancis (talk) 21:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy request

Dale, could you do me a favor? I'd like the code from these deleted templates put in my userspace, if that's possible:

These were deleted (navboxes with redlinks) while I was inactive for an extended period of time. I'd like to fill them out with links, without having to reinvent the wheel... Thanks in advance. Strikehold (talk) 22:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Input needed

at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of NCAA Division I men's basketball players with 13 or more blocks in a game. Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 14:08, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 U.S. Women's Open

I did understand why you listed the U.S. Women's Open qualifiers the way you did. You did it because that's how it has been done on the articles for the Men's U.S. Open. However, I did not believe that replicating a bad article design was a good idea. The format used in the Men's U.S. Open articles is merely copied from the way the USGA displays the qualifiers in their publication. And, while, it may work there, I don't believe it is a format that is easy to understand in the very different context of Wikipedia. Sometimes just copying the way things have always been done is not the best way. I hope you understand. --Crunch (talk) 11:49, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 FIBA World Championship rosters

Some guys on their keep editing the names of Greek clubs to the incorrect Greek language form. I have fixed it several times and the keep changing it back and the one guy is getting aggressive about it. They are not adding the English names of the clubs, but the Greek ones. But the clubs officially use the names in English everywhere in the world outside of Greece. For an English website they definitely use the English names, which are the official ones of the club. Like Olympiacos, not Olympiakos. Can you discuss this with those people that keep changing it and explain it to them?74.194.176.82 (talk) 14:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tommy Amaker GA

Thanks for helping to get this article started

This user helped promote Tommy Amaker to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UConn Huskies vs. Connecticut Huskies

Check out Category_talk:UConn_Huskies and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2010_July_17#University_of_Connecticut_athletics_categories. Not sure where you'd stand on this.--Mike Selinker (talk) 05:30, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball squad template

Hi there. I just read your message at Template talk:Football squad player. Unfortunately I was on wikibreak at the time, but I was wondering if you were still interested in adapting it for basketball articles? I've coded a prototype, which has an optional |basketball parameter. An example of it in use can be found here (columns are optional, all I did was cut and paste from Watford F.C.)

I notice that WP:BASKETBALL has its own roster template. But at Olympiakos B.C. the football one is still used for roster changes, so it might be worthwhile to do this. Let me know if you still think it would be worthwhile, and if so I'll ask an admin to make the amendment. Regards, --WFC (talk) 00:12, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note to you

I just found out you were from Kentucky, I'll I gotta say is, Wildcats Suck and GO VOLS --Nascarking (talk) 04:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darts

There is a proposal for a Wikiproject on darts, so why don't you join the proposal or discuss a Wikiproject for darts. Just click here and sign the proposal or discuss it. Mr.Kennedy1 (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as per WP:PIPE I have reverted your change to perfect round. It is generally unnecessary to bypass redirects, so there is no problem having the links the Nike Tour. Regards, wjematherbigissue 22:24, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the FIBA Hall of Fame article

Hey - just wanted to say "nice job" on the changes you made to this entry. I looked at it this morning after the 2010 inductee release went out. It was a mess and is much clearer now. Keep up the good work! Rikster2 (talk) 01:09, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Happy Dale Arnett's Day!

User:Dale Arnett has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Dale Arnett's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Dale Arnett!

Peace,
Rlevse
00:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:21, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portal: Current events/Sports way too big!!!

Hi Dale

I know this has been discussed in the past but with no conclusions. I feel that now we have grown a real monster. The August article ended with 371KB! It takes ages to load and difficult to edit such enormous files! It's nice that people like to contribute more and more news and results, but I think we should find a way to filter the items with a net of bigger holes, if you see what I mean...--Nitsansh (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have to agree. I know one thing that was discussed was creating a subportal for North American (US/Canada) sports; maybe it's time to revisit that idea. Also, August is always a busy month because it's the start of Champions League and Europa League qualifiers, not to mention other major soccer competitions. This year, the Youth Olympics sent it up another notch. I think it also might be a good idea to create subportals for specific sports, especially soccer and basketball. — Dale Arnett (talk) 23:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think there are just months who are bigger (like Aug 2010) and some who are a lot smaller like mentioned above. In the Summer months there is more traffic in most sports, so more is added of course. Don´t know if there is a need to split... Kante4 (talk) 21:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't explain how the pages have doubled in size from the same months last year. The number of events worthy of reporting on these pages didn't grow that much. For example: I don't recall all the junior basketball championships in Europe (there are 6 of them!) even mentioned in previous years. --Nitsansh (talk) 22:09, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I just found out that August 2010 in sports ranks in 4th place on the Long pages list. Two more articles this year (March and July) made the top 30. I definitely won't like these articles to become regular features on this list....--Nitsansh (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 FIBA World Championship squads

Thanks for that catch on the New Zealand Breakers...I knew they were in the Australian league, but completely spaced out when I was counting the flags! Bds69 (talk) 16:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chase for the Cup question

Aren't there ten Chase races?

The 2009, 2008, and 2007 articles don't seem to list results for all ten. 2009 lists seven, 2008 lists six, etc. Enigmamsg 18:27, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FIBA

Hey, thanks for fixing 2010 FIBA World Championship for Women squads. I took the infos from FIBA.com site and surely made some misstakes. ;) Kante4 (talk) 21:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Gal

Hi, I just gave your hook the go-ahead at DYK. Please note that footnote 8 of the article doesn't lead to the page you cite; perhaps you could fix that. Best, Yoninah (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give it a look. FYI, that item was actually in the article before I ever got to it. Up to now, I took it on good faith. — Dale Arnett (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Edward Gal

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo upc.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo upc.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:24, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NCAA Division I men's basketball coaches wins list for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article NCAA Division I men's basketball coaches wins list, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NCAA Division I men's basketball coaches wins list until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jrcla2 (talk) 15:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans

Thanks for your editorial contributions. You may want to post this on your user page:

This user helped promote 2009 NCAA Men's Basketball All-Americans to featured list status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SI's MLB all-decade team

Thanks for the great "catch" (excuse the pun), re the starting rotation in the online cite. When I was doing the draft of the article (in or about Jan. 2010), I had based it on the December 28, 2009, print issue of Sports Illustrated, which only had a starting pitcher, relief pitcher, and closer. It did not have a starting rotation. When I finally was ready to convert the draft to an actual Wiki page ( a few months ago), I checked to see if there was an online cite and then added it as a footnote. Unfortunately, I "assumed" that SI's online page would be the same as the Dec. 28 print issue. Obviously I was wrong. Thanks again for spotting that. Eagle4000 (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I've just suggested merging True Family into List of Unification Church members since the information in the first is mostly aready in the second. Please discuss if you like: Talk:List of Unification Church members#Merge in True Family. Kitfoxxe (talk) 09:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the extinct species of Lady Paladins, Ladybacks, and Lady Rebels

I've posted various nominations on CFD today and yesterday about no-longer-Lady teams. You created some of these categories. Weigh in if you like.--Mike Selinker (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PEDs and 500 HR club

I replied to your comment, I think your issue with my response was mostly a result of my unclear language! :) Staxringold talkcontribs 17:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 end of year rugby tests

Hi Dale,

Just to let you know I undid your update on the Spain/Canada match about the blood replacement as it wasn't a blood replacement. A Canadian prop got sin binned on 28th minute. On 34th minute a scrum occurs. As an experienced front row must be on the field when a scrum occurs, Canada's number 8 left the pitch to allow a replacement prop to enter. On 38th minute the sin binned prop re-enters the pitch but as no other scrum occurs until half-time, the replacement prop stays on the pitch and the number 8 stays out. At half time, the other starting prop comes off, being de facto replaced by the replacement prop, and the number 8 rejoins the pitch.

Betamarco (talk) 09:11, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Super Rugby logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super Rugby logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wooden Award Winners Men

Template:Wooden Award Winners Men has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Naismith Award Winners Men

Template:Naismith Award Winners Men has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 21:57, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball Hall of Fame websites

You have edited several articles about baseball Hall of Fame selections. Recently a robot has marked many of the references [dead link], primarily because the NBHOFM has a new website this year or last year. Many of those targets are press releases.

I don't know how many of the press releases or other pages have been republished somewhere on the new site. If not, the Internet Archive may be useful. old website, baseball Hall of Fame (NBHOFM) --P64 (talk) 23:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject NASCAR invitation

Hello there! I would like to invite you to Wikipedia:WikiProject NASCAR. I have seen some of your NASCAR related edits and they are very valuable. To become a member please add your name here. By joining the project you may also recieve a award for your contributions. If you would like to get a production of the Project Newsletter please add your user name recipients list. If you so wish, you may also display the {{User WP NASCAR}} userbox on any page in your userspace. Thank you and happy editing.

P. S. On your edit to 2011 NASCAR Nationwide Series, I moved the information from the introduction to a new 'Changes' section. Nascar1996 20:19, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thought process

1. Make change 2. Read discussions on talk page 3. Wait, hold on, I could have sworn I looked at the article as I was spelling that -- tariqabjotu 03:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Super Rugby logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Super Rugby logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent edit to Interstate 70 in Colorado

Dale, FYI, in your most recent edit to this page, among other things, you updated the date from 2009 to 2010 for the claim "As of 2009, the Eisenhower Tunnel is the highest vehicular tunnel in the United States". The problem is that this sentence is sourced to this page [1], which was last updated in 2009. As such this citation is no longer valid, as it cannot be used to source a claim dated to 2010, being last updated in 2009. Do you have a source for 2010? or should the data be rolled back to 2009 in the article? Dave (talk) 17:11, 15 December 2010 (UTC) PS, per WP:NOTBROKEN, it is not necessary to "fix" links to redirect pages.[reply]

51 (number)

I got confused when I read this. In your change on Sept 20, you stated that a number of leagues have retired the number 51, then say that only one league has retired the number. Please clarify. Obankston (talk) 16:57, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Nice catch on Jason Isringhausen. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 02:32, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Good day.

I have recently nominated an Article that you have contributed to, for deletion at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fingerpoke_of_Doom_(3rd_nomination) Seeker of the Torch (talk) 15:01, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of foreign NBA players

I like the recent edit you made to the list. It makes the list more accurate. Though, I have a question. I wonder why you add periods to several notes. I am under the impression that incomplete sentence should not have period.—Chris!c/t 04:44, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Dale Arnett! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Baker Street

Your addition to Baker Street (song) has been reverted. Whenever adding possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, please include sources. RadioFan (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you're referring to the statement that Ravenscroft claimed to have originated the story that Holness had performed the sax solo, the BBC story about the Holness urban myth—which is already used as a reference—explicitly states that Ravenscroft made that claim. As for the report that Rafferty was still making £80K a year from the song, I cited it explicitly from an obituary in telegraph.co.uk. — Dale Arnett (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If you could make those references clearer in your edit, that would help. I didn't read that BBC story quite the way you characterized it, as a joke.--RadioFan (talk) 04:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Brees 400 yard game

Thanks for finishing up my work on List of NFL quarterbacks who have passed for 400 or more yards in a game. Matchups 11:58, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Black Canadian categories

Hi there, first, let me say that I am an admirer of the fine edits you regularly contribute on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and effort here, especially on the sports articles. Anyway, my reason for writing is that I am concerned with your addition of the "Black Canadian" categories to articles, which seem to be sometimes based on something other than reliable sources. I am specifically thinking of Joel Anthony. While it may seem like he is Black, I feel that adding any categories based on ethnic, ancestral, religious or other possibly controversial fields are not helpful and should be avoided. See WP:BLPCAT for more details. Thanks and happy editing.--TM 03:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

David Campese

Hello Dale, it's Sergio from it.wiki. While writing the Italian article for Campese I noticed that the English one is on unsustainable state since 2007... I left an entry into the talk page and signalled the fact to the Project Rugby Union also. Definitely not an article to be left that way for a rugby player who won a World Cup and is the first-tier top try scorer. -- SERGIO aka the Black Cat 20:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Six Nations Championship squads

While you have done a fantastic job on this page, I do not see the need for the players ages to remain 'frozen'. I understand that caps should not be updated but it just looks inaccurate for their ages to stay the same. Please consider changing this, thanks. --MSR-Liverpool (talk) 21:38, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 NASCAR Sprint Cup Series

You used the wrong prose for the rule change section. It needs to be in normal written form, and not in points. Thanks, and since I didn't have time to reword it I reverted. Sorry. Nascar1996 03:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I reworded it. Also, thank you for updating the Rules and Regulations page. Thanks! Nascar1996 03:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program is looking for new Online Ambassadors

Hi! Since you've been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, I wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.

If that sounds like you and you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors during the current term, which started in January and goes through early May. If that's something you want to do, please apply!

You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).

I hope to hear from you soon.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:56, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question regarding 2010-11 Top 14 article

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010%E2%80%9311_Top_14_season#Key Quick question, how do you create the green border in this section (signifying defensive and offensive bonus points)? It seems one is needed but I'm not sure how to create it. Thanks CalBears99 (talk) 23:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I just realized a team can't get both types of bonuses in one match in French rugby. Sorry CalBears99 (talk) 23:59, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Bill Dague

An article that you have been involved in editing, Bill Dague, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Paul McDonald (talk) 13:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I noticed you worked on the Outline of basketball. Thank you. This outline has special significance in the Outline WikiProject, because it is being developed to serve as an example to the sports WikiProjects. Many sports don't yet have an outline on them, including the major sports of soccer, American football, baseball, ice hockey, and golf.

Our plan is to complete the Outline of basketball, and then contact the various sports WikiProjects and show it to them, as an example of the type of outline they could have for their sports.

By all means keep up the good work. The Transhumanist 09:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Courtney Vandersloot

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:National football team women

Template:National football team women has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jameboy (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Real tennis

Now that Federer and Nadal are showing signs of burn-out, perhaps we can get them to change courts! As they enter history, they might step back a few centuries, and keep the old forms alive.Nishidani (talk) 15:26, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 02:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final of 2010-11 Heineken Cup

Thank you very much for info. I was thinking as Ireland Leinster won the first semi-final they would be declared the "home team" but finally not. It was a mistake and sorry ;).

And well, thank you again.

Congratulations for your works in Wikipedia. -- TheSoccerFanAmericanista (talk) 19:00, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Armbrust has given you a cupcake! Cupcakes promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cupcake, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. †

College football help

Thank you for everything you have done for pages relating to college football over the years. I have been updating college football pages for the last 3 or 4 years now and your profile comes up all the time on pages I am editing and you always make very good edits and additions. Right now I am I'm the process of creating a page for every Division I team for the 2011 season (FBS and FCS) and have noticed that you have helpped with additions/changes to categories. I very much appreciate that because I try my best but sometimes miss categories or don't start necesarry ones when creating these pages. I just wanted to say thank you for your contributions to the cause and hope you will contiune to help me as I help the wikipedia football world this summer. Thank you and hope to see your great contributions as time goes on.Bsuorangecrush (talk) 09:03, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Portal comment

Thanks for adding in the reference. I meant to do it when originally adding in the note but it seems to have slipped my mind. --Kevin W./Talk•CFB uniforms/Talk 19:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2011 China Floods

Hi Dale, I noticed you added the 2011 Missouri Floods to the sidebar for ongoing events - disasters section So I wondered whether you might consider doing the same for the 2011 China floods article? The article itself needs work - but it's an ongoing event so it will always need work, I've started progressing the article via it's talk page, but I'm a bit out my depth dealing with such a large subject at my limited Wikipedia experience level. So I'd value your feedback both on the article, and on what level of article (stub/start/good etc) an article needs to be before it can be added to the sidebar without people complaining about that action. EdwardLane (talk) 17:25, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • My immediate thought is that while the article needs to have a certain level of quality—definitely more than stub—the criteria for inclusion in the sidebar are more related to the magnitude of the event than the quality of the article. I didn't get any feedback, up or down, for adding either the recent Mississippi River floods or the Joplin tornado to the sidebar. The Mississippi River flood was among the largest in American history. By some measures, it was larger than the legendary 1927 flood, the most destructive in the US. As for the Joplin tornado, it caused more deaths than any US tornado in more than 60 years. — Dale Arnett (talk) 17:37, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the feedback. I'm going to upgrade the article a bit and then try adding it to the sidebar, see what happens. EdwardLane (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women Squads

Hey, the FIFA-list is at times completely different like you mentioned. They had Angerer with 40-something caps while the dfb.de has her with 92 and so on, i did not change the US, Frence and German caps/goals. What do we roll with? Kante4 (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • My gut feeling is that I'd go with the individual federation's numbers IF they can be confirmed for each player. By "confirmed", I mean that all caps credited to each player are indeed against full national sides. This can easily be determined for Canada; I suspect the same would apply to the the other countries you named. I'm getting ready to work out and maybe shop a bit... I'll think it over while I'm out.  :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 20:06, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nikola Mirotić

Oh, I'm actually very sorry for reverting your edits. I have been trying to edit other sections of the page and must have accidentally reverted your edits. Thank you for letting me know. — (talk) 5:50, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Women's FIFA Group C standings

Dale,

You say that Sweden must win by 3 goals to win the group. Is that right?! Why?

If Sweden wins by any score they will have 9 points and the USA 6 points. Why isn't that a win for Sweden? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tumb (talk • contribs) 18:03, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

8 (number)

Cool update. Cheers, JoeSperrazza (talk) 19:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P:CE/S matters... what's your say?

Hi Dale... I would like your opinion regarding the latest discussions on my talk page... in particular the last one... Thanks--Nitsansh (talk) 18:13, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please point out to me where in the MOS it indicates that duplicate links can be present in tables? Since I do considerable about of work on Fraternity chapter lists and Fraternity National Convention lists, knowing that I *don't* need to go through and make sure only the first convention in Chicago gets a link to the city would be *very* useful. Also, most of my tables are sortable, so I can't always guarantee that if it is sorted on the host chapter (for example), that the first Chicago in the coding ends up as first in the sorted table...Naraht (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your triple DYK nomination

Hi Dale, I have reviewed your triple nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Festus Ezeli and I have an issue with the tone of the articles. Could you see my comments at the nomination page and reply there? Thanks. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:31, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Festus Ezeli

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jeffery Taylor

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2011–12 Vanderbilt Commodores men's basketball team

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of college football coaches with a .750 winning percentage

Thanks for updating this list. Jweiss11 (talk) 06:20, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sint Maarten

That was an absolutely heroic series of edits to fix Sint Maarten country code/area code change. Just when you think 'all done' there's one more that was missed... -- 80.42.236.111 (talk) 19:33, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Olympiacos B.C.

Hi. Can you please make it where only registered users can edit that page and can you please put an auto review roll back on it? People keep messing with the depth chart on that page endlessly for so long now now and it's just ridiculous and absolutely impossible to keep it correct because of much trolling of that team's depth chart goes on at that page. Either that or can you just have the depth chart removed? Because it is just ridiculous how people just mess with that depth chart endlessly by over and over and over putting players at the wrong positions very blatantly and obviously on purpose.173.216.237.132 (talk) 09:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject College Basketball discussion

Dale, I know that you created Template:Gonzaga Bulldogs men's basketball, but some of us are starting to feel that those types of navboxes need some standardization and re-tooling. There's a new discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College Basketball#College basketball program navboxes - standards that might affect your Gonzaga template. I'm sure that you're not super attached to the template and would be fine with any agreed upon changes, but we always welcome opinions on these issues. Thanks. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain West Conference and Conference USA football alliance

Thanks for the help on Mountain West Conference and Conference USA football alliance. It is appreciated. --SportsMaster (talk) 18:11, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Coaching lists

Thanks again for keeping those coaching lists up to date. Jweiss11 (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Dale Arnett! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Orphaned non-free image File:Girondins bordeaux.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girondins bordeaux.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do you add internal links in an article to another article in wikipedia?

  • Article title#Section title — Dale Arnett (talk) 22:02, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • One more detail I forgot. If there is more than one section of an article with the same heading, add the sequential number of that heading after the title. For example, if there are three sections in an article that have the heading "Foo", link to them as follows:
    • First section "Foo": Article title#Foo (I think "Foo 1" will work as well)
    • Second: Article title#Foo 2
    • Third: Article title#Foo 3
Hope this helps... — Dale Arnett (talk) 22:06, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dale, I saw your edits to you Don Nehlen. You're 100% right about team links in the infobox. That is the standard for Infobox college coach. As for the body of an article, it's a little bit more nuanced. If you're writing "Bowling Green State University" then that should link to Bowling Green State University. If you think a link to Bowling Green Falcons football is more appropriate, then the copy should be changed accordingly. It's not good practice to write "Bowling Green State University" and have that wikilink to Bowling Green Falcons football. That's sloppy and misleading to the reader. My general practice with coaching biographies to start off with mention and a link to a given university, then then work in a link to the team article in the supporting detail. I think it's worth mentioning and linking to university articles in coaching bios because the universities are the organizations that hire and pay the coaches, and the coach's influence tends to extend to the university at large. Jweiss11 (talk) 18:24, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I figure you've already changed that part back... if you haven't, be my guest.  :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 18:29, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done indeed. Jweiss11 (talk) 20:53, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sandusky edit

Part of your recent edit has been reverted because it violated Wikipedia's Biography of Living Person's Policy. Please review the policy before continuing to edit. jheiv talk contribs 03:24, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but

Thank You for sharing my view regarding this [2] [3]. But if you want to be thorough, you have to change all this, as I did here [4], because you left the medal table uncorrected. Howard the Duck seems good cooperative guy, but FIBA's pages are complete mess. Pantagana (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duke of Marmalade

Just to let you know that Duke of Marmalade to which you contributed, has made GA.Tigerboy1966 (talk) 00:06, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 04:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NBA salary cap

I think some of my edits were lost with your last major change. Not sure if it would have prevented this, but there is {{inuse}} tag that you can add to articles when you are doing major edits. I'll wait before restoring the lost changes, in case you were still working. BTW, for historical purposes, was the info on pre=2011 CBA retained in the article? Thanks for updating the article.—Bagumba (talk) 20:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch my comment, I think all is intact.—Bagumba (talk) 20:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I know why I was confused. The article text seemed to be cut and pasted an extra time in the article. I was bold and chopped off the bottom half. Hope that was correct.—Bagumba (talk) 20:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You got it right. :) What happened was that I messed up my cut-and-paste. When I noticed an edit conflict, I copied my edit to my Mac's clipboard. When I re-edited, incorporating your changes (I had the edit history up in a second window, so I had access to your work), I forgot to select the contents of the edit window so that my clipboard contents would replace the current version. — Dale Arnett (talk) 21:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of acronyms and initialisms: P (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to PG, PF and Power forward
List of acronyms and initialisms: B (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bul
List of acronyms and initialisms: T (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tan
List of acronyms and initialisms: U (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to USAP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Lists#List of acronyms and initialisms: P

FYI; you seem to be one of the more prolific contributors to these lists, so I thought I'd give you a heads up about that thread. postdlf (talk) 06:01, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Gonzaga Bulldogs men's basketball team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Three Rivers Community College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of acronyms and initialisms: M, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mass Rapid Transit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Dale Arnett,


My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.


So a few things about the interviews:

  • Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
  • Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
  • All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
  • All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
  • The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.


Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 02:46, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Kentucky Coal Fields

You may want to take a look at this article. If the anon editor is correct, it may need to be moved. Bms4880 (talk) 15:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Phantom

Good job spotting the inbreeding in Phantom's pedigree. I missed that.  Tigerboy1966  20:40, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

I noticed your edits to Template:1994 Big West Conference football standings and Template:1978 Division I-A independents football standings. While your efforts to clean up links are appreciated, please refrain from replacing instances of {{cfb link}} with hard-coded links to programs. One of the main reasons for using the cfb link template is to allow the link to convert from one that points to the program/team (Arkansas State Red Hawks football), to one that points to a team season automatically when that article is created (1994 Arkansas State Indians football team). Your edits would prevent this from happening. Please feel free to correct team names in these situations, but please leave cfb link in place while doing so. DeFaultRyan 04:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Louisiana Tech University athletic directors

Category:Louisiana Tech University athletic directors, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Sonny Liston, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chihuahua (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

advice requested

I'm interested in improving the presentation of the membership timelines for the various DI conferences.

I started a draft writeup at User:Sphilbrick/sandbox for latest project

I'd love to hear your feedback on whether this idea has merit, but I'm especially interested in thoughts on where I should present this. I was originally thinking the Wikiproject basketball page, but it has broader impact than just basketball. I tentatively plan to pick one location, then either write up a an RfC, or add notices to various obvious places. However, I am not sure how best to reach out to everyone who might care, so I'm looking for your advice.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I may regret being impatient, but I went ahead and posted at Talk page of Project College football--SPhilbrick(Talk) 01:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think your idea has a LOT of merit. And, I wouldn't lose too much sleep over posting it at the college football WP—it's just the kind of thing I believe they'd go for.  :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 02:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I'm more of a basketball fan, but I was frankly worried that the football folks might be miffed if I proposed changes at the basketball board, and since most of the changes are football driven, that seemed like a good place.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 03:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the cleanup. I did know that The Summit League was formerly the Mid-Continent, but failed to consider that I should use the name at the time in the AE section. Good catch.
I honestly thought there would be more discussion. I'll give it a few more days (I've posted to all of the conference pages affected) then go ahead and make the changes, if there's no objection.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:36, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of people with surname Johnson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gus Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the alternative WCC timeline. I think I'm going to go ahead and move the proposed timelines into the articles, as enough time for discussion has elapsed. Not all the timelines have the new conferences included, but I think it does add a lot of useful information. I was a little worried it might be too much clutter, but it doesn't seem to be a problem. I'm intrigued about the idea of backfilling, so we can see where each team came form, but I'll leave it to others to tackle that. The main open issue is whether to display the count. I was originally in favor, but agree with the editor who (presumably) thinks it looks clearer without. I plan to add a comment to each timeline, so if individual conferences choose differently, it is easy enough to change the code.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Big West

Was wondering if you could fix the BWC timeline. The color for Hawaii says men's soccer, while previously it was for all women's sports. Also thanks for the history edits. hbdragon88 (talk) 05:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jamie Moyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to WGN
List of Men's Basketball Academic All-America Team Members of the Year (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ripon College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:45, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question about master table

I posed a question here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_College_Basketball/Master_Table which maybe I should have asked at a more trafficked page. I'm guessing you might know.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 19:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Change in format of Qualified teams on tournament pages

Dale, I'm working my way through the NCAA Women's basketball tournaments, starting with 1982, adding a list of the venues, and maps. I just reached 1998.

You already had added a table of the regional locations, which I replaced using the common format now present in many men's and women's tournament pages.

When I get to the present, if I haven't run out of steam, I plan to start adding lists of Qualified teams, using the format used in 2012 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament. That is, list by region, identifying whether at large or automatic and conference affiliation. I may also add maps of each qualifying team. I also plan to show the summary map identifying how many from each state, although I plan to use a different color scheme.

I'm mentioning this to you, because you added the tables of qualifiers to the 1998, and I would probably simply replace them using the 2012 format. I think this will add useful and interesting information, but I don't want to simply remove your contribution without informing you, in case you aren't a fan of the 2012 formats, and want to discuss.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:40, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. I'm not wedded to any particular format, and I kind of like the 2012 format. — Dale Arnett (talk) 15:57, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 16:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

in re: Larry Joe Inman

I'm glad that you knew there is no Lebanon High School. I was going by multiple bios and press releases that are in large part identical. All said that Inman had been coaching "...at Lebanon HS".

If you knew that one, might you also know in what fields Inman received his bachelors degree from Austin Peay and his masters from Tennessee State? I looked at even more sources without finding those tidbits, including searching both school's websites. (TSU's only reference to his getting his masters there is in the announcement of his coaching appointment.) GWFrog (talk) 23:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know about his educational background. The only reason I knew about the high school is because I'm from Kentucky. — Dale Arnett (talk) 02:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of the most common U.S. county name etymologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary piping in

One of the recent edits you made at Major League Baseball in part reverted an edit I'd made to remove some piped links (specifically to Los Angeles Angels and to Minneapolis-St Paul). There was no reason to re-add the piped links, since the unpiped ones redirect to the same articles as the ones for which you added the pipes. (WP:NOTBROKEN) Just pointing it out, I'm not changing it back in the article (also NOTBROKEN) since if I did, it would just take up space storing the article history and not really have any effect on the result of the links. I only made the change in the first place since I was editing the same part of the article anyway, and just took advantage of an opportunity to reduce the number of characters in the source wikicode. --LarryJeff (talk) 02:15, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of NCAA conferences

Thank you so much for helping keep that page updated! It's been hard for me to track everything that's been happening as the end of the semester approaches. Thus, I won't be making any edits for the next 2 weeks, but I trust that you will update that page as more moves are made. Thanks again! Dafoeberezin3494 (talk) 17:47, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I figure that since I'm one of the main contributors to the realignment article, I might as well update the conference page as well.  :) — Dale Arnett (talk) 18:04, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

City/state in Kentucky newspaper titles

I moved The Independent (Ashland) and The Times-Tribune (Corbin) back to their previous titles, without "Kentucky" inside the parens. Wikipedia appears to have only one "The Independent" in a town called Ashland, and only one "The Times Tribune" in a town called Corbin, so there's no need to disambiguate further. The Wikipedia: Article Titles policy asks us to be concise. ``` t b w i l l i e ` $1.25 ` 03:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Watt Powell Park

I was there once, long ago. Other than the light towers, is there any visible remnant of the ballpark? Any idea why they didn't remove the lights? Are they going to use them to illuminate a parking lot or something? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:01, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Help Survey

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of acronyms and initialisms: C, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral notice of an RfC

A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:List of African-American firsts# Request for Comment: Pro wrestling. --Tenebrae (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitravel/WikiVoyage/WMF Travel Guide

I'm assuming you're the same Dale Arnett that has an account at Wikitravel. Just checking to see if you are aware of the proposal to move the travel wiki to Wikimedia due to ongoing issues with the current owner of the Wikitravel site, Internet Brands. There is currently am RfC open asking for people to state their support, opposition, or neutrality regarding the proposal. Also, due to spambot issues, lack of patrolling, among other things, Wikitravel content ceased to be backed up around August 2 (I myself only found out recently). In relation to this, there is a proposal to move the English travel wiki (and possibly other language versions) to WikiVoyage on an interim basis in preparation for a big move to WMF. Eco84 | Talk 20:36, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help with FIBA Basketball World Cup Yugoslavia/Serbia issue

The FIBA Basketball World Cup and related articles to it keep getting falsely edited to show that Serbia won medals that were actually won by Yugoslavia. This also happens on the article page of Serbian national team. On one of the articles, Russia is also credited with the medals of the Soviet Union. If you try to fix this, someone else just edits it back. The Serbian national team article totally takes credit for medals that are not officially theirs, and you can't edit it to fix it, without it being reverted. Can you help with this? Here are the official records from FIBA --> [5] [6] [7] - the same problem exists at the Serbia and Montenegro national team article, which was even redirected, but FIBA counts it as a separate team --> [8] - and again, FIBA counts Soviet Union and Russia as separate teams, with separate medals, but in some articles Russia is getting credited with those medals, but here is how FIBA counts it ---> [9] [10] - the same problem exists at the articles of individual tournaments, where the wrong teams are listed, trying to credit medals won to countries that don't actually get credited with them, or simply placing the wrong country in the tournament competition. Can you help with this problem? Because no matter how much editing you do to fix it, the edits just get changed back, especially the ones related to the Serbian and Yugoslavian national teams.Bluesangrel (talk) 11:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sounds like those pages need to be protected. The level of protection will depend on where the edits are coming from. If they're coming mainly from IP users, then it shouldn't be hard to get semi-protection (i.e., edits allowed only from registered users) approved. If registered users are involved, then it gets trickier. — Dale Arnett (talk) 16:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for List of international rugby union tries by Shane Williams

Orlady (talk) 08:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of acronyms and initialisms: F (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to FIG
List of acronyms and initialisms: M (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to MCU
List of acronyms and initialisms: S (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to SAA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1903-06 Massillon Tigers / Bob Shiring

My great-grandfather, Bob Shiring, played center for the Massillon Tigers from 1903-06. He was from the Pittsburgh area and was one of four "ringers" paid to play by Massillon. He also played for the J.F. Lalus Athletic Club in Pittsburgh in 1899-1900, Homestead Library & Athletic Club in 1901, and Pittsburgh Stars/Pros in 1902. I have inherited a collection of original photos from these teams and and have collected other photos and articles. Sports Illustrated ran a story in the 2/6/12 issue called The First Super Bowl on the big game in 1906 between Canton and Massillon. I helped the writer with the story and SI gave me a photo credit for the picture postcard of the Canton team that I provided them for the article. I am working on some related projects, including with the Hall oF Fame, and would enjoy connecting with anyone interested in sharing information, asking questions, etc. Please feel free to contact me at gkficery@comcast.net. Thanks! Gregg Ficery

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dale_Arnett&oldid=510120692"