Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rcolbert80 (talk | contribs) at 20:27, 10 February 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Ali Pabrai

This Article is deleted while made few edits/updates/enhancement as per few references or sources from other websites. Unfortunately it was totally deleted. Please review this article again. Uday Ali Pabrai is an Indian-American entrepreneur based in Newport Beach, California, USA. He wrote few best selling books. (please check below links). Please check the following sources from other websites or old wiki sources. We have request you to republish at least the page was before the year 2013.

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Pabrai, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mike V (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
Furthermore, none of the sources listed above meet all three requirements of giving significant coverage, being reliable, and being independent of the subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:17, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Matt Segal

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. It disappeared while I was adding references. —Anne Delong (talk) 14:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:20, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jawjawgal/sandbox

I, Jawjawgal, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jawjawgal (talk) 15:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. See WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion of Floors To Your Home article

Deleted for: Expired PROD, concern was: Advertising for nonnotable business. The article was a description of a 93 year old business similar to Home_Depot or Allied_Carpets, both of which have articles. Being a national business and one founded in 1921, notability cannot be grounds. It is a description, not an advertisement, citing individuals known to their city communities in their times, and relating how the business shifted with trends and developments in the industry. -50.195.132.94 (talk) 15:42, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user MrOllie (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Oz Principle

I, 98.112.44.82, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 98.112.44.82 (talk) 16:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nicky_Taylor

Camerateck (talk) 16:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Questel

Reason to undelete the page Alan Questel

First and foremost, if the page was not written according to the neutrality spirit of Wikipedia, it can be edited to make it more informative and less promotional.

There needs to be a bit if history here to support the un-deletion of the page Alan Questel.

extended content
The Feldenkrais Method was developed by Dr. Moshe Feldenkrais (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosh%C3%A9_Feldenkrais) who is now deceased. It was Dr. Feldenkrais’ intention that his work be developed beyond the scope of what he did in his lifetime.

There are presently around 7000 practitioners of the Feldenkrais Method in the world today in 35 countries, but only a very small number of them (probably about 20) are in the position of training people to become practitioners and developing programs that continue and further the work of Dr. Feldenkrais.

Alan’s Wikipedia article was based on his contributions to the ongoing development of the Feldenkrais Method as one of the foremost experts worldwide, as a developer of programs that receive recognition worldwide (ie Pregnant Pauses with over 150 teachers in 21 countries), his published articles in several languages and his book, which is currently being translated into Spanish.

Alan’s career prior to the Feldenkrais Method was as an actor (past member of Actor’s Equity) and he worked with Paul Sills in Story Theatre and with Jerzy Grotowski and the Polish Theatre Laboratory in the US, France and Poland. When his page was active on Wikipedia he was listed and linked under “Living American Actors”

Another leading contributor of the method, Ruthy Alon, also had her page deleted. While it was not the most well written page, it is evidence of others who have continued to develop the work of Dr. Feldenkrais and create there own body of work gaining recognition worldwide. Ms. Alon’s page (upon being rewritten) deserves to be undeleted as well.

As mentioned above there are number of others who continue to develop the Feldenkrais Method and its varied applications and they too deserve to listed on Wikipedia too if they ever so desire. These are not simply practitioners of the method but a few who have gained worldwide recognition in their own right.

-189.182.191.134 (talk) 17:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Alexbrn (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. What is needed to establish Wikipedia:Notability is references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The present references are all from within the Feldenkrais system. JohnCD (talk) 17:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MetaGer

Its an article about a german hosted meta search engine, not an advertising -18:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Bluimlilac (talk)

 Not done. This was not deleted as advertising, but because it did not explain the importance or significance of the subject. To have a Wikipedia article would require references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." to establish Wikipedia:Notability. The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it important enough to write substantial content about? See also WP:Notability (summary) for how that is interpreted. If you think you can provide such references, contact the deleting administrator, user Alexf (talk); if you have already done that, you can apply at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 23:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lion vs. Tiger

I just started the page last night, and some jerk deleted it on me already. I want to retrieve my saved material, and I will finish the page today. I realize it is incomplete, but I just started it last night. I will finish it today. -EasyTherePilgrim (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to have had content other than an introductory sentence, and would be speedy-deletable as a clone/fork of the long-standing Tiger versus lion article. I'm not sure this is a good way to resolve your editorial dispute on that article. DMacks (talk) 19:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
EasyTherePilgrim, I could also advise User:Peridon that you called them a "jerk" if you would like? personal attacks of any kind are not usually a good way to request favours from others ES&L 19:13, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A similar page Tiger versus lion already existed and it already covered the same content. I don't see why a duplicate is necessary. BigCat82 (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is the contents deleted by me: "Who would win in a fight, a lion or a tiger? This question has fascinated people since ancient times....and the debate still rages on today. Since these two cats don't naturally meet in the wild, the answer of who would win comes down to conjecture. History, fights in captivity, fights with other opponents in the wild, hunting skills, and the tail-of-the-tape are all evidence that need to be considered." I didn't know we already had an article on the subject (and didn't think it a particularly encyclopaedic subject). EasyTherePilgrim probably didn't know, either. Or didn't know that we don't have two articles on one subject, maybe. I've been called worse than that before, by the way. Probably get called worse again too. Peridon (talk) 20:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
EasyTherePilgrim had edited the existing page prior to starting this new one, and appeared to be not-succeeding in getting some preferred edit into it. I'm not making any call further than that. DMacks (talk) 20:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. We do not need a WP:POV fork. The page should stay where it now is, as a redirect to the existing Tiger versus lion Any disagreement about the content of that should be settled by discussion on the talk page, or if necessary WP:Dispute resolution. JohnCD (talk) 22:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Military Technology During WWII

I, Mars3725, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mars3725 (talk) 21:58, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JRPskits

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gubbles12 (talk) 22:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC) This person wanted me,a business person, to make a Wikipedia context for them I need this back so I can edit and repost if I don't do this I could be fired. This is the biggest one this year. Please help and do this.[reply]

 Not done. Wikipedia is not for promotion. If your business involves being paid to write articles, you should read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Also, there is no indication that this group of Youtubers is anything like notable enough to have an Wikipedia article, which would require references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bianca Biasi

I am ready to add sources -AS_Sydney (talk) 23:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. I have reset the ten-day clock on the PROD-BLP notice, which may be removed once a reliable source has been added. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note that if the article is to be kept it needs to establish WP:Notability by references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, see also WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:CREATIVE. JohnCD (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Izaline Callister

I, 92.22.124.52, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 92.22.124.52 (talk) 23:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TheSkyNet

TheSkyNet should be a page about the distributed computing project by the same name, www.theskynet.org The origonal article was deleted for (A3: Article that has no meaningful, substantive content: G1: Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible), as I am unsure what was on the deleted page it is hard for me to procede. If it is possible for someone to provide it to me as a userfied page or emailed to me that would be great. -Eckley (talk) 02:34, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All it had was "is a computer program that decided the fate of the human race in a microsecond". I think a fresh start might be advisable. Peridon (talk) 09:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, cheers for checking that out, a fresh start it is. Eckley (talk) 03:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hardy Haberman

Hardy Haberman is a notable person and it would be useful to have an article specifically about him. I believe an article about him can easily meet notability requirements. I saw that the delete log indicated the deleted article did not meet those requirements but I'd be happy to work on it and correct any shortcomings; there are plenty of verifiable sources from which to draw information. -Steevithak (talk) 05:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request by Georgewilliamherbert. JohnCD (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Armorial Register Limited

I, Kiltpin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Kiltpin (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have had to wait till references from the Lord Lyon were available. They have now been obtained and I am able to proceed. Thank you. Kiltpin (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

adityaram

Adityaram is a very good Film Producer and he selects the stories to entertain the audience. He given Good Telugu Movies like Kushi Kushiga, Sandade Sandadi, Swagatam, Ek Niranjan. I found his profile few years back, now it is missing. -122.164.198.177 (talk) 14:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adityaram, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kithira/Course Pages/BIOL 15/Assignment 2 pages

Kithira (talk) 16:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. What is the purpose of these pages? They have not been touched for more than a year, and rather than contributing to building the encyclopedia, they seem to be using Wikipedia as a class project work-space - see WP:NOTWEBHOST. JohnCD (talk) 17:04, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muqit Hawa

Wikipedia is about getting to know about different personalaties and that is what I have done here -Kuttabest (talk) 17:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. No, Wikipedia is about building an encyclopedia, so it only has articles about people who are notable. That word is used in Wikipedia to mean that other people have already written about them, so that there is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:MUSICBIO for the notability standard for singers. JohnCD (talk) 20:24, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bazic Products

The company has existed for 15 years in USA, and I see their products everywhere (even in other countries!) but there is not one article on wikipedia about this mystery company? I would think wikipedia of all websites, would have information about this company. -EricC2013 (talk) 17:58, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
The company will have an article when someone is interested enough to submit an acceptable one; evidently you are the first contributor to have a go. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need to give references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christiane Robbins

GeoLewis (talk) 18:28, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: this draft page has not been deleted, and you are welcome to continue working on it. Note the comments left by others. When you are ready to send it for review, click the "Resubmit" link at the bottom of the "template" (large pink box) at the head of the page. JohnCD (talk) 19:48, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shivkrupanand swami

I, D3m, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. D3m (talk) 21:14, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This page cannot be restored because it is a copyright violation from https://plus.google.com/103193142134260725345/about. JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vision Films (2)

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. It was deleted as I tried to add references. —Anne Delong (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Anne Delong:  Done. JohnCD (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colton Sissons

Please restore the edit history for this recently re-created article -Dolovis (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:55, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Royal Franchising Group Of Canada

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Bresley (talk) 02:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My page request was deleted and I don't understand the reason. I think there is a misunderstanding here somewhere. Please provide me with instructions or what we need to send you to fix this.

Thank you in advance,

 Not done That article was repeatedly deleted, and would be deleted for multiple reasons including notability WP:CSD#A7, and promotion WP:CSD#G11.
Also this user has been indef blocked for posting a legal threat on the article talk page. ~Amatulić (talk) 03:43, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

bonjour Technologies

This shouldn't be deleted as I had already provided associated reference for the article, Please visit external links (company site) to review the details. In case you need any further information please revert back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raju.bhagat (talk • contribs) 07:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Treepodia

I, Mikedarnell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mikedarnell (talk) 08:48, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/S. B. Jain Institute of Technology, Management & Research, Nagpur (SBJITMR)

Narendrabawane (talk) 09:52, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Negotiation Mastery: Tools for the 21st Century Negotiator

I, Shilabetek, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Shilabetek (talk) 15:13, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. See WP:Notability (books). JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Responsible Mining (ARM)

This was a project for an internship that documents the actions towards building a responsible artisanal mining community. I was unable to edit it over the rest of the year, but would like to make sure that it gets edited and approved-- and finally on to Wikipedia! Thank you! -2601:9:6800:2A1:D1AD:AAC6:193C:B9A3 (talk) 15:50, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored your other G13-deleted submission, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Fairmined Standard at the same time. Both of these read as though Wikipedia is being approached as a noticeboard for the organization to tell the world about itself and its work; but that is not what an encyclopedia is for. Read Wikipedia:Your first article for advice, and note particularly that references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources are required to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steve Fossen

I, Mothetoed, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mothetoed (talk) 22:08, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Please restore the version of 18:36, 28 January 2014 and delete the current version. Hasteur (talk) 17:19, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Doc Jazz

I, Justice1st, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Justice1st (talk) 18:10, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Al Birr

It actually was about piety and righteousness and Allah Subhanahu wa ta'ala is the person to whom every act of obedience is to. -عمر چودھری 19:30, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

It also had no meaningful substantive content. Therefore: Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Alexf (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ASD Learning Ltd

The page was deleted due to not having 'Links to a site not controlled by the organization', however I have now found several qualifying pages to link to and would like to undelete and edit this page so it can be considered a helpful contribution to Wikipedia. Could you please undelete this page to my User section, so I can make the necessary edits before it goes live. Thanks. -B.hygate (talk) 23:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: as this was deleted after a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/ASD Learning Ltd, it would be better if you asked the administrator who closed that discussion, user Tone (talk) to "userfy" the page for you - move it into your user space for you to edit. You will need to ask Tone for permission to post it when you have worked on it. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pocket Tripod

I, RambodR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. The article wasn't accepted at the time of submission because the Pocket Tripod wasn't an actual product yet, it was only a prototype. The product as been manufactured and proven, and I would like to re-submit this page for review -RambodR (talk) 02:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mailcoms ltd

It displayed a speedy deletion message and i had contested but did not recieve a reply. I was willing to edit the article to meet Wikipedia standards as stated in my message on the talk page. It was deleted minutes ago. -Monkeypope (talk) 12:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Monkeypope/Mailcoms ltd. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Yunshui (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. You need references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability JohnCD (talk) 23:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cai Carney Media

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Footballwhizz (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. That article was deleted under WP:CSD#A7 (no assertion of notability) as well as WP:CSD#G11 (spam), as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cai Carney Media. Any of those reasons makes the article ineligible for undeletion by request on this page. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Biogerontology Research Foundation

The previous page was deleted for unambiguous copyright violation. As the Biogerontology Research Foundation [1] is a legitimate UK charity, it should have a WP page - which I am happy to write from scratch, avoiding the previous contributor's copyright issues. -Henry Stanley (talk) 13:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Two points: charities don't automatically get articles, and this article can't be deleted as it was a violation of copyright rules. Feel free to try again with fresh wording and referencing that is reliable and independent - and shows notability (see WP:GROUP and WP:RS). Peridon (talk) 16:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List Of Notable Yu-Gi-Oh! Cards

I participated and requested for the deletion of the above topic but would like the contents of the article placed here please: User:titusfox/LONYGOC —Preceding undated comment added 16:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Do you want List of Yu-Gi-Oh! cards · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]? the List of notable Yu-Gi-Oh! cards was only a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Thank you! Regards, TitusFox 13:43, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TouchCommerce

I, 12.232.165.2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 12.232.165.2 (talk) 17:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

infodemiology

Deleted du to lack of notability. However, over 6700 hits on Google for infodemiology, and over 20 articles in the medical literature (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=infodemiology) make this a questionable decision. -173.35.247.99 (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. That article was speedy deleted back in 2006, under WP:CSD#A7, but I think our rules have evolved since then, as the article does not qualify for speedy deletion under that A7 rule.
Please add references to the article to improve it. Currently it relies on primary sources, which is not acceptable. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:16, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sequential Circuits Prophet VS

I, Vapeur, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Vapeur (talk) 22:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - @Vapeur: as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:51, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That American Life

The podcast is wildly popular in the U.S. and has ranked as high as number 6 on iTunes comedy podcasts, only a few months after the show's debut. It has over 100,000 subscribers, and has a 4.5/5 star rating (based on 191 reviews) on iTunes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe3guy (talk • contribs) 04:13, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sydney Alliance

The Sydney Alliance is a partner of the Industrial Areas Foundation[1], the oldest and largest community organizing network in the world. It launched at Sydney Town Hall on 15 September 2011[2].

The Sydney Alliance uses community organizing to help make Sydney a better place for everyone to live. It is made up of over 52 diverse partner organisations[3], ranging from the Archdiocese of the Catholic Church to the Cancer Council of NSW, the Arab Council of NSW to UnitingCare [4], to the NSW Jewish Board of Deputies and the Nurses Union[5].

The Sydney Alliance has nine districts[6] across the suburbs of Sydney, where it brings together local parishoners, unionists and community leaders to identify and solve local problems. For instance, in 2011, the Liverpool-Fairfield district successfully campaigned for Medical drop off zones to be built outside 6 health centres[7], and in 2013 the St George-Sutherland district has been campaigning for a lift at Arncliffe Train Station[8]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.33.28.11 (talk) 05:12, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please edit it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." to establish WP:Notability, see also WP:Notability (summary) and Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. JohnCD (talk) 10:13, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny & The MoTones

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -JanineRivers (talk) 05:40, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I started the page and then fell ill for many months. The page was never finished and I wish to complete it now.

India in Love: Marriage and Sexuality in the 21st Century

Can you please tell the reason for deleteing it. As it is my first time and the book is genuine. -Indiainlove (talk) 06:18, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Hossain Shimul

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Shimul.ruet.ce10 09:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

sarah shearer

Entering further information on an upcoming author — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purple Pict (talk • contribs) 14:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

checkY Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Wikipedia does not generally cover the "upcoming", only those who have arrived. Check out WP:AUTHOR for the notability standard for authors, and WP:Your first article for general advice. JohnCD (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grace Arents

Deleted after prod expiration in 2007. Definitely notable. I want to expand whatever was there.. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 16:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The entire text of the article was "A Richmond, Virginia philanthropist and niece of Lewis Ginter." I hope you can do better than that. --Orlady (talk) 17:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/දැදිගම වී. රුද්‍රිගු

I, Bhagyapwc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bhagyapwc (talk) 18:24, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This article has never been submitted for review, but it cannot be accepted here on the English-language Wikipedia unless you translate it into English. Perhaps you should submit it to the Sinhalese Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:58, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SF-7x Super Fruit

I, Superfruit1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Unlike six months ago when there weren't legitimate outside sources for information regarding SF-7x and its Super Fruit products (i.e., the reason the page was turned down in the first place), currently, those outside sources are in place. Superfruit1 (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: in its present form the draft is hopelessly promotional and needs a complete rewrite. Wikipedia is not a platform for free advertising, and anything like that is liable to speedy deletion. If, as your username suggests, you are connected with the company, please read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. 23:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)JohnCD (talk)

Global Commercial Credit

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mvivthirteen (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC) 1= Global Commercial Credit 2= I would like the page that was deleted back, if only for a moment, so I may try and figure out why it was deleted. I felt as though I was following the guidelines for an informative company page. Our client requested we create an informative page for consumers to help them understand the industry. I was trying to mirror an existing page on wikipedia. It seemed simple and straightforward.[reply]

Could you please explain more specifically about the infractions. I am happy to make the appropriate changes. This is my first time creating and I am trying to get the hang of it. Mvivthirteen (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done @Mvivthirteen and RHaworth: Besides being written in a promotional manner, this was a blatant copyright violation of the content found here, here and here. Please also note that this type of paid advocacy for clients is anathema to Wikipedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anamika Mishra

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Iread8 (talk) 19:57, 7 February 2014 (UTC) Reason for deletion was that it doesn't have any significance etc. Anamika Mishra is an author of best selling novel Too hard to handle. She is from India. Here is the link of Amazon author page of Anamika Mishra - http://www.amazon.com/Anamika-Mishra/e/B00B348PDG And here's is the link to Anamika Mishra's interview on a popular newspaper Millennium Post - http://www.millenniumpost.in/NewsContent.aspx?NID=48011[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Repeated A7 deletion, protected. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:45, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Re-created, deleted again and salted. Any further request should be addressed to the deleting administrator, user DangerousPanda (talk). JohnCD (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Awitenista

Awitenista is the biggest annual songwriting competition in Ateneo de Davao University. It showcase local Filipino artists' skills and talents in the field of music. -Indiecollector (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mehal Rockefeller

174.57.84.189 (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) No rationale given, G13. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:49, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Albert Henrichs

Was deleted seven years ago for reasons I can't quite recall. Henrichs is a notable scholar at Harvard University. See also [1] or de:Albert Henrichs. -bender235 (talk) 11:59, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: It was an unsourced biography of a living person - the only "ref" was to Harvard's website. It was a single line stub anyway. Note also that the German Wikipedia has very different notability standards. There's little of value to obtain from the deleted version, and if you choose to try and draft something, use either a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or WP:AFC DP 12:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Duff

According to the editor, the page was deleted for Reason A7: not important. Gerald Duff is a noted author with 13 Books currently available on Amazon. I wrote the Wikipedia article with an attempt to be humorous in Duff's style. Perhaps this put the reviewer off. -Jread 21205 (talk) 17:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Number of books available on Amazon doesn't automatically confer notability; whether the author has been written about or their books have achieved critical acclaim or a movie deal does. Also, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, so I do somewhat agree with your suspicion that the levity was inappropriate, but it wouldn't have, in and of itself, triggered a speedy. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: if you click on the "redlink" Gerald Duff again, you will see that the A7 deletion was in 2006; that article was about an American lawyer. Your article is still at User:Jread 21205/Sandbox where you wrote it, and has not been submitted for publication.(Mistake - see below.) I have added a {{User sandbox}} template at the top which has a link for you to submit the article, when it is ready, to WP:Articles for creation, where an experienced user will review it and either accept it or give you feedback. Before you submit it, though:
JohnCD (talk) 18:14, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The article in question was Gerald duff with a small d. It was deleted as blatant advertising (G11), but I think A7 would have been possibly more appropriate. Opinions vary. Peridon (talk) 20:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
BTW being available on Amazon merely indicates existence. They'll list almost anything so long as it's available on demand and they don't have to buy in a stock. I've seen a 20 page book on there with an asking price of £97. I don't know how many it sold... Peridon (talk) 20:03, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Self-trout). I saw the sandbox in the user's contributions, assumed that was the explanation, and didn't look in his deleted contributions. Regardless, I think his best plan is to revise the sandbox article and submit it via AfC as I suggested, so as to get it checked and get feedback. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

outpsyjah

This psytrance project needs its wiki article undeleted so that it can be referenced in coordination with other projects from Australian artist Tom Vallance, who is responsible for numerous unsigned music projects -Tomahawk333 (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
You would do best to start by making an article about Vallance, with references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to show how he meets the WP:Notability standard of WP:MUSICBIO. Individual projects will also need to show their own WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article on Tom Vallance http://western-riverina-arts.blogspot.com.au/2014/01/tom-vallance-rides-again.html, http://www.irrigator.com.au/story/199937/art-space-a-dream-for-artist/ (Australian artist) can be addressed in coordination with the outpsyjah article. The outpsyjah mixes comprise a saga, which is a notable feat in itself - also, they are not signed to any label and no revenue is being gained from the music, so to label this as advertising or promotion is to misinterpret the importance of outpsyjah's music — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahawk333 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can link you to a number of external sources that reference the works of Tom Vallance ^^^ - if that information will be seen to legitimize the existence of this article.

And there are multiple sources of information on the outpsyjah psytrance project, which cite its importance; https://soundcloud.com/outpsyjah, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr64G9k1jUA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomahawk333 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for any kind of promotion, even of non-commercial enterprises - see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. The inclusion criterion is called WP:Notability, and requires evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Blogs, Twitter, Youtube, Soundcloud etc don't count as reliable, because anyone can post anything there. See WP:Notability (summary). The test is, have people not connected with the subject thought it important or significant enough to write substantial comment about? More detail at WP:MUSICBIO and WP:CREATIVE. Once other people have written about these projects, Wikipedia can summarise what they say, but an encyclopedia is not the place to announce new things. JohnCD (talk) 09:28, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The skill full person on online

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vijayannamalai.wiki (talk) 05:54, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. We have never had a page with that name. If you mean Vijayannamalai the master of online internet service provider the answer is no, because Wikipedia is not a social-networking site like Facebook, Twitter and all the others where you have made yourself accounts. Those are all places for people to write about themselves, but Wikipedia is quite different - a project to build an encyclopedia. Read the WP:Welcome page, the WP:Introduction and Wikipedia is not about YOU to find out more about it. JohnCD (talk) 09:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Grupo de Capoeira Beribazu

I, 115.187.228.108, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 115.187.228.108 (talk) 10:18, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:55, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

R.a.G.e

This page was deleted via WP:Prod on 21 September 2006. It has breviously been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R.a.G.e. Per WP:PROD, PROD should only be used for articles previously discussed on AfD and hence PROD should not have been used here. N.B. I checked the version of WP:PROD in force at the time of deletion and it said the same thing then. -Op47 (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • You're right that PROD should not be used on articles that have been to AfD, even if the result was keep or no consensus. However, if this is restored, it is very likely to get sent straight to AfD again. If you are intending to work on it, it can be restored into your user space. Peridon (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I think your post should read "not previously discussed on AfD". Peridon (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done The PROD vs AFD policies were very different in 2006 when this article was deleted. That, and for temporal reasons alone (I mean seriously - you want an article undeleted that was deleted 8 years ago??) this is unwise to undelete (except for possibly to a draft somewhere) DP 10:41, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Performance Nissan

I, FbachmanII, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FbachmanII (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question: User:FbachmanII, although we're typically more lenient with G13's, it's not "references" that are the issue - it's notability. It was a car dealer ... they're not notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. Is there something somewhere that grants any inkling of notability??? DP 17:45, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The dealership sold to the public company for reportedly the highest multiple of earnings in the history of United States Nissan dealerships, after it was started from scratch. Please advise as to what else would make it notable, as it WAS a record-breaking breaking one-price dealership for Nissan before it was sold. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FbachmanII (talk • contribs)

Do you have a valid, third party reference for that claim? "Highest earnings for a Nissan dealership" seems pretty specialized and non-notable overall when considering that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of notable topics DP 10:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geva Salerno (Geva Ledezma Salerno)

I, 70.193.196.24, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 70.193.196.24 (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey Baek

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. We also don't need the whole of the article posting here, please. Peridon (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is deleted now as blatant advertising per WP:CSD#G11, and will not be restored. Talk to the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sydney alliance, again

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -101.170.85.80 (talk) 22:36, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Already  Done two days ago, see WP:REFUND#Sydney Alliance about twenty items above this. JohnCD (talk) 22:58, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Platform505

This entry needs revision. Platform505 exists. I did not get any notice of it being deleted by wikipedia - just an email on Feb 9 after it had been deleted on Feb 8. Please reinstate it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icecream53 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Terranigma box.jpg

This image was replaced by the PNG version in Terranigma. However, the PNG is smaller than the JPEG version, and I'm sure that (per WP:IUP) JPEG can display better colors than PNG, despite JPEG's lossy compression and PNG's lossless quality. Also, 300px JPEG's 300-pixel display of image may be more superior to 250px PNG image's 300-pixel display. -George Ho (talk) 03:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sheikh Tariq Al Qassimi

I, Rak Holding, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rak Holding (talk) 05:16, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read Wikipedia:Your first article for advice, and note particularly the need for references to reliable sources to verify what the article says and establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teon

re-edit -Ottofung (talk) 05:45, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:21, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kcal Healthy Fast Food

No real reason why it has been deleted, follows closely to macdonalds and other fast food chain wikipedia pages -AzizaComm (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ~Amatulić (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: User AzizaComm is apparently Aziza Communications, a PR firm editing to promote clients. The account is now blocked for promotion and username policy violation. ~Amatulić (talk) 10:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
...aaand, sockpuppet account Jill downie (talk · contribs) recreated the article, and is also now blocked. ~Amatulić (talk) 10:19, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Brock

I, 50.136.245.219, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to update this page without creating a new one entirely. Jason Brock is a famous SF artist who gained popularity in the show X-Factor. He is a notable advocate for gay rights.50.136.245.219 (talk) 07:53, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, note the need for references, and cut out promotional language like "humble, yet extravagant style... highly talented... extremely likeable..." An encyclopedia article should not contain your personal opinions, only facts, neutrally stated and cited to reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 17:02, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stockopedia

I, 94.193.160.185, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 94.193.160.185 (talk) 08:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Annakshetra

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Anitaagarwal (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Question: what is the name of the page you want undeleted? JohnCD (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment:: I see you have now re-created this and submitted it. I have added the name above, for anyone else interested. It looks better than the previously-deleted version, so no action required here. JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taxila Business School

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 180.215.198.77 (talk) 15:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

<content added from duplicate entry--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2014 (UTC)>[reply]

This is for the benifit of general public as this is information about top ranked aicte govt of india approved business school -180.215.198.77 (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done This was a blatant copyright violation of the school's website and so cannot be undeleted and must not be recreated with copyright infringing content. Note also that, as is normally the case with such pages copying an organization's promotional material, the content was absolutely unsuitable for an encyclopedia article. Note that I have also deleted what I presume is your userpage, which also infringed on the school's copyrighted material.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 16:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buenvenida

I, 112.207.158.121, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 112.207.158.121 (talk) 15:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC) ,[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/KGLR FM

I, Rcolbert80, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rcolbert80 (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Areas_Foundation
  2. ^ http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011-09-15/sydney-alliance-campaigns-for-better-city/2901324
  3. ^ http://www.sydneyalliance.org.au/about-us/partners-2/
  4. ^ http://unitingcarenswact.org.au/advocacy/sydney_alliance
  5. ^ https://apheda.org.au/printversion/35072.html
  6. ^ http://www.sydneyalliance.org.au/about-us/districts/
  7. ^ http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/win-for-the-people-as-liverpool-council-installs-medical-dropoff-zones-20121025-2888n.html
  8. ^ http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/win-for-the-people-as-liverpool-council-installs-medical-dropoff-zones-20121025-2888n.html
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=594876984"