Jump to content

User talk:Justice007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Darrenmong (talk | contribs) at 11:05, 10 March 2014. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

ANI

Just to let you know, I have mentioned your name in this discussion Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Viriditas_and_User:Anupam. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:19, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Juristicweb (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Dear Justice007, thank you for the kindness that you showed to me recently. I really appreciate your efforts to stand up for me and ensuring that the community realizes that my intention is to make Wikipedia a better place. It means a lot to me. I hope to see kind spirited editors like yourself editing on Wikipedia. Your friend, AnupamTalk 18:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Final !!!

Mr. Justice, Rather than giving the funny names to article section of Muhammad Iqbal you, kindly do some constructive work to develop the article. If you keep on reverting my constructive edits, You will leave no option for me rather than take your case to Wikipedia:RFC or WP:DRN, where you will be stopped from editing on particular or WP articles until you develop your skills, and the entire article of Muhammad Iqbal will be tagged with multiple remarks if the case reaches at Wikipedia:RFC or WP:DRN, and before reaching Wikipedia:RFC or WP:DRN, I supposed to warn you for the consequences of it, rest is upto you. Best wishes. --Omer123hussain (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orissa and Odisha

Please go through this discussion to know about the name change discussion. thanks for contributions to wikipedia. --Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 14:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not involve in edit warring

You removed template

Main article: Muhammad Iqbal Urdu work

, from the article Muhammad Iqbal, with the edit summary of Copy edit, and main article mentioning as reference for further study is itself stub article unsourced ,not clear notability,and just newly created by Omer123hussain Please discuss on talk page for this [1] and next time you do any edit first discuss on talk page to avoid edit warring. :))--Omer123hussain (talk) 09:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not apply blogs as a Source.

In your recent edits at Tarana-e-Milli, you had applied a blog as an source here, which will put the article in more trouble. Blogs cannot be applied as an source, (except in very rare exceptional cases). Please stop this !!!, Please read and understand WP:MOS before you make any edit. :) Cheers.--Omer123hussain (talk) 12:52, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tarana-e-Milli. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MPhill Thesis for Idris Azad BioGraphy

i have cited or ref the mphil thesis of Abbas, Mohisn (Urdu adab kay faroog may Khushab ka hissa)and it is published from Allama Iqbal Open University. is it not a worthy reference to any content?? kindly plz tell me how can i cite this so that it is acceptable ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qasimyad (talk • contribs) 12:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tehelka

Thanks a tonne , and I would be happy to learn from you. Woh to dost hain nahin jo haste meri gaflat pe hain, Zindadilon se dosti , nacheez ka bhi shauq hai Realnews7 (talk) 10:32, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shreya

Thanks for cleaning up this article. Just wanted to remind you that the formatting should be italics for film titles and quotes "" for song titles. Please don't change that. BollyJeff | talk 13:05, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Nazia Iqbal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharjah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Deity

Please will you explain why you have reverted my edits to this article. If you fail to do so and revert my next edit I will report you to administration. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 22:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Because you added the content without providing reliable sources, and removal of anything needs sources too,and all changes should be first discussed on the talk page of the article, not on my talk page. Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 09:18, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, The Oxford English Dictionary is the most authoritative dictionary of the English language. There simply is not a more reliable source in existence. Secondly, your claim that any change to an article must be discussed on the article's talk page is also untrue. This would be an extremely laborious protocol would it be wikipedia policy. Fortunately no such policy exists. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 17:25, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Seaton Revision

Dear Justice007, I see that you commented on the need for revisions to the article about Sandra Seaton. I just noticed that your recommendation to revise the article by adding more documentation and references has been followed through on. There are now more references and footnotes. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lavender21 (talk • contribs) 23:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
Excellent work keeping out POV and poorly formatted edits out of Pakistan, Allama Iqbal and many other articles. lTopGunl (talk) 16:43, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Comma in Pakistan

Hi Justice007. Actually, TopGun was right to revert it. Commas are only correct where there is one of quite a small number of specific reasons for them. If you're interested, this page gives a very clear, accurate introduction. Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dunes Review

Justice, could you check out my other article, Dunes Review User:Guillaume2303 deleted the whole thing from a starter class down to nothing and then put it up for deletion. Dunes Review is the first and only literary magazine in Michigan NOT controlled by a government educational institution. --David Holmer (talk) 20:09, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Justice, just read your comment about staying away... I'm sure you have the articles best interest at heart. I will stay away. If I made things worse, please be bold and edit it out. --David Holmer (talk) 23:04, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article is notable in my view according to reliable sources.Thanks for staying away, it's better because creator of the subject should not much involve in the discussion, let's do other editors.Justice007 (talk) 23:13, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Please look over my comments did they make it worse? Should I delete? or is it fine the way it stands now?--David Holmer (talk) 23:20, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Remove everything or just my undecided comment?--David Holmer (talk) 23:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Justice, I appreciate it.--David Holmer (talk) 23:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Justice007, it really is very inappropriate to change another user's comments in an AfD discussion. I see from the discussion above that you did this with David's agreement, but people at the AfD will only see that you changed his comments and that doesn't look good. In future, it's better if David would do these things himself. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 08:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Guillaume, I just wasn't sure the policy about removing my inappropriate comments.
Justice, I removed the other comments after thinking about it. They were in response to JoannaSerah's comment about my person. --David Holmer (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The Article Rescue Barnstar
Great job saving Dunes Review from deletion at AFD – David Holmer (talk) 09:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hey, you are involving in edit warring, by reverting poets name here, Kindly clear your misunderstanding that this is a list of poets, but not the list of poets who have article on WP. Please self revert your edit, rather than involving in edit warring. lastly do maintain the adequate and mannerism in your edit summary. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 23:24, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think you need rest, on wikipedia, everthing should be according to wiki rules, and stop posting "Edit warring",that is not, you cannot add the red links, those do not have the notability.Justice007 (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Omer you are mistaken. The talk page clearly prohibits red links, as well as the hidden comments in the list--which you had to have seen. Omer: if you want to add red links you must gain consensus on talk first. Justice: just because someone is ignoring consensus and you know they're ignoring consensus and I know they're ignoring consensus is not a justification for edit warring. Put a warning on their talk, post a message on WPIndia, or go to ANI to report disruptive editing. I'm not watching that article--but feel free to drop a note if there's any more trouble. – Lionel (talk) 02:09, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict):* This is not a first time, that kind of "Edit warring", I am receiving from him every time, which I am ignoring of his lack of the wiki-knowledge. Thank you for your notice of that disruptive behaviour.Justice007 (talk) 09:27, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Justice stop hounding on editors, and I don't think but I believe that you need a complete rest forever :)
@Justice If it is redlink, remove the link, do not revert the work, And one more advice to you, do some research before blindly reverting any edit.
@ Lionelt, you are mistaken, Is it better to revert or to develop the contents? My intention was not to make it a redlink but to correct and restore that poet with reliable sources 1, 2, and before I could work it out, The reverting editor (Justice) jumped in between like an illiterate and without discussing or trying to know my cause, started edit warring, before I could complete the work.
@ Lionelt, I think you missed to read this text on article, according to which I wanted to apply sources, any way If you are talking about this consensus read it properly, the editors agreed for the redlinks if it is a notable poet based on this Wikipedia:REDLINK#When to create red links. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 09:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted simple text, and You are arguing that you reverted REDLINK, (see your brilliant work once again, this one what you placed above), Really it proofs what you are ??? :)
Well if you want details see below :),
  • :: I ( Omer123hussain ) made a edit at 22:57, 13 July 2012.
  • :: and you ( Justice007) reverted that edit at 22:59, 13 July 2012.
  • :: Before I could apply reliable source, with in difference of 2 minutes of my edit you reverted it, is it not edit warring???
Please stop playing on WP, I am really fed up with your non-scene, false blaming and edit warring. and as I advices you above, Please please please do some research before blindly reverting any edit. It is not you but me who is ignoring your edit warring. But this is last time, next time If you blame it will be reported further.
* NOTE: Seen you edit once again what you reverted REDLINK or Simple text, okay I will link it for you here. :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 10:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are realy confused, before reverting I wikified the name, that was red, and it is the name of author or poet but not text, red links or black links have not notability. I am very cool person, I am here to help everyone and improving and expanding the articles. Please think twice before writing or speaking your views.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 13:46, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No one bothers if you are cool or what ever, just discuss according to WP policy, and please as I told you make it your last excuse. And if you do not understand any thing please feel free to discuss. Regards :) --Omer123hussain (talk) 21:08, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Lymari Nadal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ponce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rebecca Hammond Lard

Was curious as to how/how often the wiki-class on articles is checked/changed. I was thinking that this article was getting close to a C-class, but it is still a Stub? --David Holmer (talk) 07:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Justice, the major edit changes were made for the assessment from Stub class to Class-C. Please don't undo... at least discuss before changing it back, it's scheduled for assessment. Thanks. --David Holmer (talk) 10:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is NOT redundant... the info is different. It is a summary look at Walt Whitman PLEASE!--David Holmer (talk) 10:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC) Justice, Why are you NOT communicating with me? Why don't you look at the article I suggested? Why don't you want this article to improve? Please, TALK TO ME !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --David Holmer (talk) 10:37, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YOU DONT OWN IT EITHER... Gillaume was assessing it for C-class until you started undoing all the work of improvement!--David Holmer (talk) 10:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC) You are suppose to IMPROVE the article NOT maintain it at STUB-CLASS !!!--David Holmer (talk) 10:47, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • * Adding multiple sections with redundant content do not make it klass-C, I do not think Gillaume will do that. I do not own it too, but you created the article, leave it to others if you cannot expand and improve it properly.Justice007 (talk) 10:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am NOT going to argue with you, I will ask Guillaume to step in and compare both edits, and will abide by his decision--David Holmer (talk) 11:02, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done with Wikipedia. Spangle has ruined Rebecca Lard... sounds like sh!t because he can't speak English and shouldn't be working on an English site. I am tired of having to argue and explain proper English to people who are too lazy to put forth the effort to listen or learn how to speak it properly. Congrats on the saving of Dunes Review. I just wanted to stop by and thank you for being the sole editor that I truly enjoyed meeting on here. Thanks again for your efforts! --David Holmer (talk) 00:15, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Burden

Read WP:BURDEN and do not restore source misrepresentation and WP:SYNTHESIS--DBigXray 12:55, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

There is a report regarding you at WP:AN3. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 15:24, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

afd

Please read and follow WP:DISCUSSAFD --DBigXray 18:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Hi Justice, you may want to defend yourself here on an SPI report initiated by Omerhussain123. Just bringing it to your attention since he did not notify you. Mar4d (talk) 20:10, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If I can suggest something Justice, don't even bother commenting there unless there is something really egregious. I don't think this will go anywhere, so don't even get upset. Nolelover Talk·Contribs 20:47, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

Salaam Justice007, I noticed that you added your awards to your talk page. I added some additional ones from your archives! I hope this helps! With regards, AnupamTalk 01:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Barnstar

Dear User:Justice007, thank you for your kind barnstar. I'm glad to know that I'm making a difference here and appreciate the fact that editors like yourself notice my work! I hope you have a nice day! With regards, AnupamTalk 06:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikify: July Newsletter and August Drive

EdwardsBot (talk) 21:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jinnah

Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DBigXray 13:04, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have not been through cited sources, I am just copy editing and making layout.What you reverted that passage was not added by me I just reverted someone els edit, and you seem to agree with my concerns. I will look at the references that are not cited to any passage (though not mentioned by you.) Justice007 (talk) 13:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you are reverting/undoing an edit, you should say so in your edit summary , the edit summary here was misleading.--DBigXray 13:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done self reverted and restored your edits, cheers--DBigXray 14:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at TopGun's talk page.
Message added 16:27, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for Helping :) Zunaira jamil (talk) 03:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the Content not on contributors

To prevent the WP:Drama WP:Comment on content, not on the contributor Please read and follow this , You may rephrase your recent comment on Talk:Anti-Pakistan_sentiment--DBigXray 18:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please

Explain how you got to this article and why you reverted me. Darkness Shines (talk) 18:56, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have nearly 2000 pages to my watch list, especially Pakistan related articles, is it objectionable?. I undid your reverting because of illegitimate revertion, while there is reliable source available.I hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have never edited said article with this account before, how does it come to be on your watchlist? Darkness Shines (talk) 19:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes I never edited that, but well I watch every time all edits all of editors who contribute the Pakistan and India related articles, where I think, is appropriate to contribute, I do without any hesitation, assuming of course good faith.Justice007 (talk) 19:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Bull, it is not possible to watch all edits by all editors in this topic area, especially as you have never been to this article before under this account. Given there has been a fair few edit wars on it since you joined Wikipedia it strikes me as strange you should suddenly turn up now. Please disclose any account you used previously with which you edited this article. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Further, to say you saw this on RC rings hollow. Your contributions history shows no evidence of an active RC patrol, nor could you have seen that edit fully three quarters of an hour after I made it on RC, it would have dropped off the list. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:49, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Don't be suspisious, I patrol all pages thoroughly that I have on my watch list,or I glance at. It is not necessary to go everywhere,but you must know every editor has right to be bold to edit everywhere, there are no any restrictions, regulations and limitations about, whether to do or not. If you have any concerns relating that, please go to file at proper notice board rather than wasting my time that I can use to improve and expand other articles.I have replied you in very clear way, if you don't believe me that is your matter not mine. I hope this is enough to help you. Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 22:24, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for not even remotely responding to my questions. All you have managed with your prevarication is to ensure that you are in fact a sock or a rather unfortunate meatpuppet. Darkness Shines (talk) 23:45, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Justice should this persist, take it up to ANI. You might not be aware, but calling established editors a sock is a personal attack and is blockable, esp for some one with the history like DS. You don't have to explain anything to another editor on how you get to another articles. Stalking is only brought into account when the two editors have a history of disputes or when you have a pattern of appearing at new articles one editor edits. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi User, you have reverted my work (rather than discussing it on the talk page) with some abusive and humiliating sort of edit summary.

Omer, I found nothing in WP:MOS to substantiate your position. However WP:IC says "Wikipedia does not have a '"one inline citation per sentence" or "one citation per paragraph"' rule." That said, it is always best to discuss issues on the talk page. And Justice, it's always better to talk about the edit, not the editor. Hope this helps! – Lionel (talk) 01:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
@Lionelt; I clearly mention c/e (copy editing), any way what is the logic of repeating same single source 3 times in the two line sentence? and abusing/discriminating the editors through edit summaries, without discussing or bothering to discuss. Regards :)--Omer123hussain (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not guilty!

The Purple Barnstar
Awarded for bravely asserting your innocence and mounting a powerful defense against the charges brought against you.
– Lionel (talk) 01:52, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on WP:Articles for deletion/India and state sponsored terrorism. Thank you.

P.S. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 09:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justice, updated article on P.K. Kaul

I've been working on a number of India related articles, and have recently updated and improved the article on P.K. Kaul. Would appreciate it if you could take a look and leave your comments on the talk page on how it may be further improved. Any edits and modifications/improvements to the article would be most welcome. I am still looking for a free image to post on Pratap Kishen Kauls wiki page. Any help in this regard would also be welcome. Thanks. -Ambar (talk) 02:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Muhammad Iqbal Page

Dear Justice 007, Not sure why you revert my edit. Iqbal is known as the 'Poet of the East' only among the Urdu-Hindi speakers. Arabs, Farsi-speakers, Chinese, and other Eastern linguistic groups have no clue Iqbal is being hailed as the 'Poet of the East' by the Urdu speakers. Please provide references showing other linguistic groups calling Muhammad Iqbal the 'Poet of the East', if you really have such a belief. warm regards, Cemendtaur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cemendtaur (talk • contribs) 14:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Source 9 states only Poet of East, we have to follow that, not personal view point or description in this regard that you are doing,I have also replied you on the talk page of Muhammad Iqbal. May I ask you why you are especially interested to make him limited??.Justice007 (talk) 14:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Ram

Malik Ram's surname is Baveja and not Ram; Ram is part of his first name; he is to be addressed as Malik Ram. Kindly restore to Malik Ram from Ram. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soni Ruchi (talk • contribs) 03:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • I know, and personally I have no problem what should be the name, our subject of area uses the names differently, but I change the name according to wiki rule WP:surname, about same problem I had once with an editor clashing arguments, because I had same idea that you have now. I am going to ask him for more clarity of the policy, may be we find some solution in this regard.Justice007 (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Malik Ram was always known as Malik Ram in the literary world, not Malik and not Ram. A lot of people in India have Ram as part of their given first name e.g. |Jagjivan Ram (called Jagjivan Ran and not Ram). In fact, even Malik Ram's mother always called him Malik Ram, according to a biography I have read and never Malik or Ram. Malik Ram is listed under M in official literary lists and library catalogues. No one has heard of him as Malik, the Urdu scholar or Ram, the Urdu writer. He is always called Malik Ram. I agree with Soni Ruchi.
In this interview he gave, the interviewers call him Malik Ram and, having read the WP guidelines regarding usage of names, Malik Ram appears to be appropriate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs9iWrPfzhI--Zananiri (talk) 19:14, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for your efforts. I have had a look and don't agree. The WP guidelines say:
"People who are best known by a pseudonym should be subsequently referred to by their pseudonymous surnames, unless they do not include a recognizable surname in the pseudonym (i.e. Madonna, Snoop Dogg, The Edge), in which case the whole pseudonym is used."
Malik Ram is actually one name. Ram, as Soni Ruchi, who created the article, and I have pointed out, is not his surname. Malik Ram should be regarded as one pseudonymous name in this case, according to the guidelines. I consider the remark about the number of edits one has made facetious. Quality not quantity is what matters when editing. I don't think you yourself have to change names elsewhere if you change this!--Zananiri (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I realy do not know any thing other than that, if you think Malik Ram is one name then go ahead and revert that, I will not object, but do not know about other editors what they think. Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 21:54, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. Will do so some time next week, as I am away for a few days. Perhaps Soni Ruchi can do it, if she sees this. Also, do we still need the tag you added yesterday, as all the reflinks have been edited and refined since you posted it?--Zananiri (talk) 22:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poet of the East

The two sources I gave are solid, dunno why that guy is still belaboring the point. Who did you think it was a sock of? Darkness Shines (talk) 06:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Your given sources support the content, but he is not going to understand, why?, that I don't know. Well I consider his act and repeated question as a pretended ignorance. I am going to talk page of Iqbal to comment there too. Justice007 (talk) 18:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And you think he is a sock of? Darkness Shines (talk) 19:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Martand Sun Temple, my recent improvements

My edits (improvements and additions) to the Martand Sun Temple article are in the attempt to make a category A (or better) article. How are the articles rated, btw ? -Ambar (talk) 08:17, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please Note

Please make sure you won't make comments like this ever again.You are supposed to be civil and calm + Make sure you use better language while defending your claim.Remember that you were even dragged to SPI for having similar language as that of some IPs. Cheers TheStrikeΣagle 07:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification

Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!

You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify[reply]

About İlknur Melis Durası's page

Hi there,

Thank you for helping me out with Melis's page. I don't know how to add the citation for her paper. It was at HIBIT conference Izmır/Turkey 2011 and her publication's name was IDENTIFICATION OF TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR BINDING SITES IN PROMOTER DATABASES if you can add it that would be great. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurgu Karga (talk • contribs) 08:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zia Fatehabadi

Greetings. The Mehr Lal Soni Zia Fatehabadi article has had that tag for a very long time. I think it should be removed now. Please have a look.--Zananiri (talk) 16:46, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done.Justice007 (talk) 19:18, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{BLP sources}}

Hi, Justice007. I noticed you reverted my edit to Joseph Noiret, stating in your edit summary, "Of course BLP sources, it is bio article". However, according to Template:BLP sources, "In non-BLP articles that require additional sources, the {{refimprove}} template should be used instead." As Noiret is not living, shouldn't {{refimprove}} be used? HueSatLum 21:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Martand Sun Temple (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to John Briggs
Murray Feingold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United State
Talib Chakwali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Punjab

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed templates

Dear user:Justice007, I for one find it very helpful, in an article that has a template at the top indicating a lack of reliable sources, to see where other editors have recommended the references should be added. I'm sure this helps others aside from me. I often then try to find references to replace the templates. Of course, I also do so regardless of existing templates, but I do find it helpful if others have marked the path (so to speak). Anyway, these are just my thoughts. I hope you don't mind me adding them here. Keep up the great work. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:20, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imran Abbas Naqvi

The edit I made to the above article corrected grammar errors, not factual errors. You have just replaced the errors. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 15:29, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ahmad Adaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to United State
M. Afzal Hossain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bangladeshi
Michele Stratico (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Turkish
Zaytuna College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Guardian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Wildthing61476 (talk) 12:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yusuf Estes

Dear User:Justice007, I hope you are well. I feel powerless to prevent the vandalism occuring on the Yusuf Estes page. An editor -- User:Muslim Online -- repeatedly posts unreferenced and clearly partisan POV material that violates WP:BLP guidelines. I could continue to revert the edits to remove this content in accordance with the ruling that "contentious material about living persons (or recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion", but I am afraid that my own actions might be misconstrued as edit warring and that I could be accused of violating Wikipedia's three-revert rules.

Please see if you can help, or at least give me some useful advice.

Thanks you and best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shafiq-ur-Rehman (humorist)

Could you please make clear your justification for moving Shafiq-ur-Rehman (humorist) to Shafiq-ur-Rahman (humorist). Just saying it's wrong is not a sufficient reason, WP:RS are required. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 15:20, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, SamuelTheGhost, as I am belonging to that part of the world, and I am also much familair to the Urdu, Arabic and Persian languages, and its grammar. "Rahman" is an Arabic word, it pronounces 'Rahman' but not 'Rehman'. Though mostly in India and Pakistan, it is commonly wrong pronouced, and translated into incorrect spelling. Academics do not make the mistake but having poor knowledge writers do that. When I come across that kind of translated wrong spelling, I make that correct, that's all, and for that there is no need of RS. Please take a look at these correct spelling articles of the same name: Ahfaz-ur-Rahman,Hamoodur Rahman, Tariq Rahman, Rahman Syed, Bushra Rahman, Rahman Baba. If you are native speaker of English, then I can imagine, and that makes me no surprise, but if you are from there, then I will suggest you please improve your knowledge of languages. I hope this helps. Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 16:17, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • No I'm afraid it does not help. Editors in wikipedia are self-selected and anonymous except where they choose to identiy themselves. I have not published my qualifications, my native language, or any other languages I know. If I did publish them, other editors would still have no way of knowing whether I had told the truth about them. The only evidence acceptable under wikipedia policy is WP:RS, not personal knowedge. These considerations apply equally to me and to you. WP:RS is the only evidence we can take any notice of.
Of course I am aware that the scholarly transliteration of Arabic: الرحمن is ar-Rahman or, more carefully, ar-Raḥman, but wikipedia policy for names is to use the transliteration found in the sources, whether or not they are "correct". In the case of Shafiq-ur-Rehman, English-language sources are using the form ur-Rehman, and apparently no other, so wikipedia policy is quite clear that that is the form we should be using. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 18:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I do not agree with you, please indicate, that where RS allow the incorrect spelling, there is also a rule WP:common sense, I do not know that we should use or not, before I go futher to discuss this issue with you, first you provide the reliable sources to support your concerns, while the article's subject has no any reliable sources to even pass the notability, I do not see and find any one there. If you are so strict and fair to the policies, you must nominate the article for deletion because it falls under the criteria for proposed deletion.Justice007 (talk) 19:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, on a quick search I found the following three, where the first at least must count as WP:RS
There are plenty more using that spelling to sell his books. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • You even didn't bother to read the common sense, it is waste of time to search the skin of the hair. I have used my best judgment to correct the wrong translated spelling of the name, as I said you it is very common blunder in India and Pakistan, even in the media. There are many articles that need to be corrected , as I have done, Ahmed to correct Ahmad, for both wrong and correct spelling, there are reliable sources, on this point, we have to use common sense and our best judgment. What you have provided the sources, only one is reliable, and that can be use for the notability of the subject to save from deletion, other two are blogs, that are not reliable sources, I have also searched, but there are not much reliable sources, it is a great pity, that that notable and great humorist has no reliable sources?. As you provided, here are from me too, with correct spelling this and that. Again the main purpose is to the correct and best judgment that I have done.Hope this helps. Justice007 (talk) 22:39, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note

I have moved the discussion from my talk page to relevant talk page of the article. Please discuss there. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 22:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harry Gill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bisley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ratan Pandoravi

Brother,this article is not about a living person. The subject died in the year 1998.Soni Ruchi (talk) 09:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VAND

[2] Not vandalism, good faith edits never are. You could lose access to twinke if you use it in such a manner to often, use the rollback AGF option instead. Facts, not fiction (talk) 23:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleting Nandini Sahu

I have been going through the discussion page (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nandini_Sahu) and it amuses me that the administrator Joe Decker assumes there can be only one Nandini Sahu. If someone made a wrong referencing to the TOI article, then it should not be treated as a judgment for deciding the authenticity of the page. The correct referencing to the TOI article is (http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Search&Key=TOIH/2011/01/24/32/Ar03201.xml&CollName=TOI_HYDERABAD_ARCHIVE_2009&DOCID=269529&Keyword=(%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3Enandini%3Cand%3E%3Cmany%3E%3Cstem%3Esahu)&skin=pastissues2&AppName=2&ViewMode=HTML). A few other online references to the subjest are as under :

1) http://www.worldofmanojdas.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=286:on-folk-in-modern-indian-literature&catid=54:interviewcat&Itemid=132

2) http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Writers&WriterID=941

3) http://www.isahitya.com/index.php/english-sahitya/467-secrecy-of-being-a-poet-a-conversation-with-nandini-sahu

4) http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=PoemArticle&PoemArticleID=97

In continuation to the references to the literary work of the subject, please find the below list which are articles in hard copy (might be non-online) :

• “A Symphony For Shanta”, B.Venkateswara Rao, Hayathanagar. Reviewed By Nandini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 1999.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Spring Time”, I. P. Deepti, Bangalore, Reviewed By Nandini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 1999. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • “ Myth as Revelation: A Study in the Poetry of W.B.Yeats”, The Scoria, Chandigarh, May 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Kaleidoscope of the Indian Society-The Voice of Indo-Anglian Women Poets”, The Scoria, Chandigarh, March 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Big Things & Small Things in Arundhati Roy’s The God Of Small Things”, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, July, 2001.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Will”, K.B.Rai, Berhampur, Reviewed By Nandini Sahu & Padmini Sahu, Poetcrit, Maranda, July 2000.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Feminism: Opposing the Binary Opposition”, Pakistan Journal of American Studies, Vol-19, Spring and Fall 2001, Nos 1 & 2, Islamabad, Pakistan.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Rasa, Dhvani & Auchitya in the Indian & Western Poetics”, Modern Literary Criticism, Authors Press, New Delhi 2003.(EDITED BOOK) • “Love Poems: The Historical Alternative---Poems of Sylvia Plath and Kamala Das”, The Atlantic Critical Review, Volume 2, Number 2, New Delhi, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Rethinking Modernity, Rereading T.S.Eliot”, The Atlantic Critical Review, April-June 2004, Vol 3, No 2, New Delhi, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Academics of Teaching-Literary Theory and Practice”, Creative Writing and Criticism, Vol 2, No 1, October 2004.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Wild Urge of a Man on Earth to Touch the Heaven---The Extra-Literary Vision of Mulk Raj Anand”, Asian Quarterly, June- July 2005.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Nostalgic Note in their Flute: A Reading of Arundhati Roy and Jhumpa Lahiri”, Indian Writings in English, Atlantic Publishers & Distributors, New Delhi, 2006.(EDITED BOOK) • “Shakespearean Heroines: The Source of Energy and Vitality”, The Atlantic Critical Review, January –March, New Delhi, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Chemistry Behind Creativity: A Reading of Sylvia Plath and Ted Huges”, Creative Writing And Criticism, Sikandrabad, (U.P.) April, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Poetry for Life’s Sake: Voice of Judith Wright”, Explorations in Australian Literature, Sarup & Sons, New Delhi ,2006.(EDITED BOOK) • “Mother And Other Poems by –Pashupati Jha” Reviewed by Nandini Sahu, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, July, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Emerging Innovations in Technology and Pedagogy” Indian Book Chronicle, March 2006, Vivek Trust Publication, Jaipur, 2006.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “The Concept of Love in Shakespearean Sonnets: A Study”, Creative Writing and Criticism, October, 2006, Sikandarabad, UP.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • “Religious Harmony and Political Cosmos: the Voice of T. S. Eliot; Ripples, Vol-I, Sep.2006 – Feb.2007.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Folk and Tribal Culture of Orissa: Religiosity, Historicity and Oral Traditions; Tribes of India: Identity, Culture and Lore; Angik Prakashan, Guwahati, 2007.(EDITED BOOK) • The Position of Women in Oriya Literature: www.boloji.com; 16th Oct 2007. • Gurudev Tagore; The Visionary with a Mission; www.bolokids.com; 23rd Oct 2007. • Valmiki : January 5, 2008; www.bolokids.com • Panini: 10th February 2008; www.bolokids.com • Two Dispossessed Habitats: A Study of Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies and The Namesake, 17th February 2008; www.boloji.com • Double Colonization for the Marginalized Children A Literary Delineation, 3rd March, 2008; www.boloji.com • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis,18th March 2008, www.boloji.com • Santh Kabir, 3rd May 2008; www.bolokids.com • Need and Strategy for Capacity Building through Communicative Skills in Open Distance Learning – Indian Journal of Open Learning (IGNOU), Vol. 17, November 1, Jan 2008.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Translation as Power; Dialogue,Vol-IV,No-1, 2008, Lucknow, India.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Two Dispossessed Habitats: A Study of Jhumpa Lahiri’s Interpreter of Maladies and The Namesake. The Atlantic Literary Review, October-December 2008, Vol. 9, No. 4.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis, New Urges in Post Colonial Literature: Widening Horizons;Atlantic Publishers and Distributors; 2009. • Words and Silences in the Poetry of Niranjan Mohanty ; Poesie India International, Vol 44,2009.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • The Cultural Designation of Feminism: Theory and Praxis, PARNASSUS:An Innovative Journal of Literary Criticism;Vol.I,2009.(REFEREED JOURNAL) • Gerard Manley Hopkins: The Poet and the Priest: A Study of The Windhover, New Perspectives in British Literature, Atlantic Publishers and Distributors (P) Ltd., 2010 (EDITED BOOK) • Double Colonization for the Marginalized Children A Literary Delineation, Surviving Against Odds: the marginalized in a globalizing world, Ed. D.K SinghaRoy,Monohar Publications.2010. (EDITED BOOK) • Nationalism through Patriotic Books; All About Book Publishing, Aug-Sept 2010. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • Winds of Change: The Voice of Judith Wright and Kamala Das, ;The Atlantic Critical Review, April-June 2010, Volume -9, Number-2. (REFEREED JOURNAL) • Nandini Sahu in Conversation with Manoj Das, published in www.worldofmanojdas.in; 04.102011 (http://www.worldofmanojdas.in/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=286:on-folk-in-modern-indian-literature&catid=54:interviewcat&Itemid=132) • Nandini Sahu interviewed by G.S. Jolly, All About Book Publishing, Vol: II, Issue- VI, December 2011-January2012 • The Shadow of a Shadow, short story by Nandini Sahu in www.isahitya.com March, 2012 • Legitimacy and Homogeneity of Cross-Cultural Experiences—a study on ‘Language Death’, Folklore and the alternative Modernities, Vol.I, Authorspress, 2012(EDITED BOOK) • Gopinath Mohanty’s ‘PARAJA’: A Study of the Folk Culture of Orissa, Folklore and the alternative Modernities, Vol.I, Authorspress, 2012(EDITED BOOK) • Documentation within History—A Study on Language Death; Creative 

Writing and Criticism, Volume 9 Number 2 April 2012

• Children’s Literature: Text and Context , The Atlantic Critical Review 11:1 (Jan-March 2012). • http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=PoemArticle&PoemArticleID=97 (Nandini Sahu in Conversation with S.K.Padhy, August 2012) • The Wild Stream, Short Story by Nandini Sahu, Rock Pebbles, June 2012



P O E M S About 200 poems published in books/journals in India (from 1995 to 2010) (in Indian Literature from Sahitya Akademi, The Quest, New Quest, Kavya Bharati,Scoria,Poetcrit, etc.) and in USA ,UK and Pakistan . o Sabata Basanta; Adhunika, Odia bi-annual journal, Spring, 2011 o Odisha Landscape, Transfire, a literary Quarterly for Translation, Oct-Dec 2011 o Haiku by Nandini Sahu, Indian Book Chronicle, Jaipur, December 2011 o Sabda, Katha Katha, Kavita Kavita,Odisha, December 2011 o Smritira Nirvana,Dhvani-Pratidhvani, 25th March 2012 o Bridge-in-Making, Syndic Literary Journal, California, No.6 , April , 2012. o Two poems, Rock Pebbles, January 2012 o Freedom, Indian Book Chronicle,37:4, April 2012 o Chahala Samaya, Nabaneeta, April-June,2012 o http://www.boloji.com/index.cfm?md=Content&sd=Poem&PoemID=12388 (poem In the Andamans, August, 2012)

BOOKS

i) Recollection as Redemption, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2004.

ii) The Other Voice, A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2004.

iii) The Silence, A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2005.

iv) Post Modernist Delegations in English Language Teaching: The Quixotic Deluge, (Ed: Dr Nandini Sahu)Authors Press, New Delhi, 2005.

v) The Post Colonial Space: Writing the Self and The Nation, (Ed: Dr Nandini Sahu) Atlantic Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, 2007 vi) Silver Poems on My Lips , A Collection of Poems, Authors Press, New Delhi, 2009. vii) Folklore and the Alternative Modernities(Vol. I), Authorspress, New Delhi, 2012. vii) Folklore and the Alternative Modernities(Vol. II), Authorspress, New Delhi, 2012


I think on the account of the above references, the administrator should undelete the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetcritic (talk • contribs) 03:31, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Khurshid Eqbal. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Note that notability has not been established in accordance with WP:GNG or WP:AUTHOR. If you need help, please feel free to ask. Cindy(talk to me) 12:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your cleanup efforts at Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi‎, in the face of considerable adversity! Yunshui 雲‍水 12:05, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Much better now. Well done, my friend. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Cheers, 76.248.149.47 (talk) 14:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Any problem

First of all, this is a stylistic issue and certainly not worth climbing the Reichstag to make my point. It's interesting that you provide Walt Whitman to make your point; that article (as best I can see from a quick look) provides either: more than one subheading per heading, or an introductory paragraph if there is only one subheading. I have no doubt that there are hundreds (I'm not sure about thousands) of articles with examples of poor style; after all, this is the encyclopedia that has no editorial oversight, that anyone can edit, and that relies on volunteers to watch over articles. It is entirely pointless to have one subheading under a heading; the heading alone is quite sufficient to help the reader navigate; subheadings allow the reader to move quickly past other information to get to the desired information; with only one subheading that is not necessary. But as I said, Wikipedia is full of articles with bad style, and I don't intend to argue or edit war over a matter when there are a lot worse problems to deal with. And BTW, as for "I don't know what you are": I have no idea what your point is with that rather bizarre comment, but it is beside the point; on Wikipedia we all have equal status; no editor has authority over content and stylistic issues that do not violate policy. Cresix (talk) 13:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"But it seems to me that you have shown your authority and choice reverting me, is it not so?": No it is not so. Read WP:BRD. One does not have to be an admin or an "authority" to follow that tried and true guideline that is used thousands of time every day on Wikipedia by regular editors such as you and me. Do you honestly think that you are being singled out here? I don't know how long you've been editing Wikipedia, but let me suggest that you read WP:5P if you have not already done so.
"but be fair, access and assess that which style was/is better": Please assume good faith. I made the revert because I thought the style I was reverting to is better. But again, this is not a battle that I find worth fighting. There are many more important things to do, both on Wikipedia and in the real world. Cresix (talk) 15:30, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Indentation

Hello. Just a quick note to suggest you be a little more careful with how you indent your talk page comments - I misread this level-one bullet point as being a level-one indentation and a reply to my comment, when I think you probably meant it as a level-three indentation and a reply to another editor. It's also normal to use colons rather than bullet points, per WP:TOPPOST. --McGeddon (talk) 11:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold!

Re your comment at Talk:Dennis M. Lynch#Sources ... when acting as ordinary editors, administrators are just like any other editors, with no special privileges. If you see something that doesn't look right, be WP:BOLD and fix it. If it's questioned or reversed, it can always be discussed to gain consensus one way or the other from interested editors on the article talk page. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, next time I will be bold and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul-Henri Campbell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page German (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012 wikification awards!

The Working Wikifier's Barnstar
For wikifying the sixth largest amount of articles in the August 2012 drive, Justice007, I am proud to award you with the Working Wikifier's barnstar! Great job!!!
The Bronze Wikification Barnstar
For wikifying 24 articles, I also award you the Bronze Wikification barnstar!!! Congratulations!!!

Wilhelmina Will has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I apologize for the far-too-long waiting period; I forgot that this responsibility rests on my shoulders nowadays! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 22:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My great pleasure, better late than never. Thanks for all.Justice007 (talk) 22:35, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Great Wiki Editor

Justice007 really is a great,noted and hard working editor.We appreciate you and your patience also.Your articles have a loyal research foe wiki readers.cheers--118.103.234.63 (talk) 00:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Rafi ul Haq,Tina_sthi,Jses02,118.103.225.170,111.119.186.84,yunshui[reply]

And I second this :) Nolelover Talk·Contribs 17:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Special Achievements

date of birth famous writer and educationalist Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Date Of Birth of famous writer Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

I think Justice007 has a rest by this link --118.103.235.143 (talk) 01:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Rolf Vessel[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen D. Lovejoy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hollis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Javed Malik

Hello there I see you have also been cleaning up the Javed Malik article. I have made some additions in wiki mark up, and requested some sources to support some facts so that I could help with an email I received. I will advise this new contact to read the Wikipedia:Starting an article and Wikipedia:Writing better articles as they seem to be new to wikipedia. I will also put a request on the WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Pakistan, and WikiProject Journalism talk pages to see if anyone there also wishes to help out as I am not familiar with international biographies and content to know how promotional it is. I feel the majority of sources they provided are new articles and portray a NPOV, but as I say I don't know for sure. Thank you very much for helping SriMesh | talk

Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is really Father Of Pakistani Children Literature

Prof.Dr.Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is reliable called Father Of Pakistani Children Literature.Prof Hamidi is avery noted and hard working teacher and children writer also.The Wikipedia Encyclopedia compiled a great,awasome research thesis on Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi first time,ascension high most rating w.r.to content,writing and all possible reliable references.It is a great effort of wiki team(Editors).Thanks edi, thanks Wiki! Hi justice007 ! Plz further improve it....plz... cheers :)

References Father Of Children Literature

--111.119.185.173 (talk) 04:18, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Elinor Lyon Jr 47[reply]

I am become autoconfirmed user....Aanapk (talk) 09:15, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Wishing you a very happy EID_UL_AZHA ..... Aanapk (talk) 15:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Dear Justice007,

I would like to show my appreciation for your multiple edits.

I would like also to ask you to act on my behalf and to accept my edit request published at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Eric_Dill#Edit_request_on_2_November_2012

I would appreciate you understanding.

Best wishes,

Daniel Dwdimov (talk) 15:02, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Join us at FB

Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: -- Captain Wikipedia! ( T - C - G ) 13:11, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayub Sabir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjab University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting my cleanup of Abhay Kumar

If you are trying to clean up this page, you are not doing a very good job of it by reverting other editors efforts at cleaning up. I would like to know in what way my removal of He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his Indian Foreign Service. He has also written a paper proposing a SAARC University at Nalanda. is "illegitimate". All probationers travel to the SAARC countries as part of their training so in what way is this significant? Similarly, the alleged fact that he has written a paper proposing a SAARC university at Nalanda would be notable only if such a university has come up,not otherwise. And, as I wrote in my edit summary, this piece of information has so far only been attributed to the subject and is not independently confirmed. Sesamevoila (talk) 19:42, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well my job is not very good, that is only your opinion. Why do you think the passage that you removed is not significant??. The source is reliable and third party, (By Ronisha Bhattacharyya (ANI)), is it not independent, then what is your description in this regard. I hope this helps.Justice007 (talk) 20:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I was only trying to remind you that wiikipedia editing is a collaborative exercise and you cannot go around describing other edits as illegitimate. I have already explained why I think the passage I removed is not significant.You have not responded to the points I raised but are harping on the source. Sources are not an end in themselves and content should be added based on reliability and context. The article quoted is evidently based on an interview with the subject and there is nothing to suggest that the reporter has independently verified the claims made by the subject. Moreover, a startling claim like the one made in the passage should be quoted in more than one mainstream publication, going by Exceptional claims require exceptional sources. While you are at it, you could also take a look at Reliability in the context. I hope this helps. Sesamevoila (talk) 05:38, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I just went back to the page and I appreciate your efforts at cleaning up but I still feel the above passage is irrelevant, and not sufficiently sourced.Sesamevoila (talk) 07:47, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have properly responded your raising points, I cannot understand your descriptions of the issue that you are taking serious unnecessarly. Though mentioned wiki rules by you are supporting the descriptions that I draw. To travel as a diplomate different states is not a big claim nor important issue, there is reliable source by third party, no matter as an interview or something else. It is written and published by Ronisha Bhattacharyya (ANI), and writer is telling the subject has been travelled etc, but not the subject. At the other hand if you do not consider it a third party source, then anyhow it is well primary source, that's why I have placed the BLP tag for additional sources for verification, that act exact meets the wiki policies and guidelines. I am moving that discussion on the talk page of Abhay Kumar, and that should be discussed there, not on my talk page.Justice007 (talk) 08:29, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to an Article called Javed Malik

Dear Mr. Justice,

We need your help.

My name is Sandra, I work for Mr Javed Malik's friend, and I have been asked to update some details on the article to ensure that they are accurate. However, for some reason, you keep going into this article and un-doing the changes that we make

Can you please give me your e mail address, so we can discuss this matter.

We would like to have the accurate information on this article, and need your help please.

I am not a professional. This is the first time i am sending a message on Wiki, I dont even know where and how to pick up my reply. But if you can please CC me on Sandraroberts21@gmail.com


Thank you

Sandra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameszapper (talk • contribs) 22:39, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit on the page Abhay Kumar

"He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his Indian Foreign Service."- There is something missing in this sentence. As he is still part of the Indian Foreign Service and is posted in Kathmandu. Generally Indian Foreign Service Officers travel to the neighbouring countries during probation days for training.

It could be -

He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his probation days in the Indian Foreign Service.

or

He travelled to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka during his Indian Foreign Service probation days.

thanks for understanding! 

Kalhause  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalhause (talk • contribs) 22:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have tried to do my best. Justice007 (talk) 23:09, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's much better. May be you can consider changing the following - He visited Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka at the time of his Indian Foreign Service.

into

He visited Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka at the time of his training period in the Indian Foreign Service.

Hope you get it. A sentence has to be complete to make meaning. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalhause (talk • contribs) 11:20, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now it is fine. thanks.

Without going to the discussion earlier, I think the following sentence does not add much value to the article because there is already a SAARC University in Delhi and an International University is coming up in Nalanda. So the following line is not of much value and therefor may be removed along with the BLP tag. "He visited Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka at the time of his training in the Indian Foreign Service. He also wrote a paper proposing a SAARC University at Nalanda.[23]" (Kalhause) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalhause (talk • contribs) 12:12, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please now remove the BLP tag from the page Abhay Kumar as several additional citations have been added. Kalhause —Preceding undated comment added 17:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ruba'i Article

Dear Justice007,

In regards to a nasty comment you posted with your edits to the ruba'i article: Peter Avery and L. P. Elwell-Sutton were both eminent scholars in the field of Persian Literature who taught at Cambridge and Edinburgh, respectively, for many years. If you think they were both "silly person" who "do not know what is Ruba'i," then you are sadly misinformed. In the future, please refrain from disparaging work you clearly have not read.

Writer83175 (talk) 10:45, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have to learn much more about Ruba'i, and do not try to teach me, what you refer the source 4 that support us( me and Spanglej), that "known as ruba'i (four line poem) dobaith (two-couplet-poem"). You, suppose as IP 75.24.202.15 did this. Which books or scholars say "rubaí contians only two lines"???, that's why I said silly, though I was not polite.Justice007 (talk) 11:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion is being moved to the talk page of the article Ruba'i. Justice007 (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writer83175 (talk • contribs) 19:41, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Ruba'i, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Writer83175 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Ruba'i article". Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!

Guide for participants

If you wish to open a DR/N filing, click the "Request dispute resolution" button below this guide or go to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/request for an easy to follow, step by step request form.

What this noticeboard is:
  • It is an early step to resolve content disputes after talk page discussions have stalled. If it's something we can't help you with, or is too complex to resolve here, our volunteers will point you in the right direction.
What this noticeboard is not:
  • It is not a place to deal with the behavior of other editors. We deal with disputes about article content, not disputes about user conduct.
  • It is not a place to discuss disputes that are already under discussion at other dispute resolution forums.
  • It is not a substitute for the talk pages: the dispute must have been discussed extensively on a talk page (not just through edit summaries) before resorting to DRN.
  • It is not a court with judges or arbitrators that issue binding decisions: we focus on resolving disputes through consensus, compromise, and explanation of policy.
Things to remember:
  • Discussions should be civil, calm, concise, neutral, and objective. Comment only about the article's content, not the other editors. Participants who go off-topic or become uncivil may be asked to leave the discussion.
  • Let the other editors know about the discussion by posting {{subst:drn-notice}} on their user talk page.
  • Sign and date your posts with four tildes "~~~~".
  • If you ever need any help, ask one of our volunteers, who will help you as best as they can. You may also wish to read through the FAQ page located here and on the DR/N talkpage.
EarwigBot operator / talk 22:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why are your edits so bad. You give wikipedia a bad name.

It is quite obvious you are building a some sort of paper trail by editing wikipedia pages. With my bio page you have consistently edited without any knowledge about my life or about my work or about the domain of my work. Your English is poor and many times the edits you have made are derogatory, sexist, and damaging.

My last edit add a reference to a published biography on me. Nadja Argyropoulou (Author), Anastasia Aukeman (Author): 'Lydia Venieri: Theogony. Charta 2011. ISBN 978-8-88158-792-6

You removed it with the comment "Not original research please read". What are you talking about????

Do you know who Charta is or who the authors are ? It's quite obvious from the comments of other people that you are very ignorant in many areas.

What authority do you have? I've looked at the edits you have done on many other pages that you claim are yours. They are often trivial and pathetic, and often damaging and irrational. What are you doing? Do you think you have some power?


I'm someone who has a well known documented career, who is recognized by my country and other countries for my work and I don't see why I have to have you editing my bio on wikipedia. Remember wikipedia has now become an important reference and your edits could be damaging. Please keep off my bio page. If you don't I will have to consider legal advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Venieri (talk • contribs) 06:43, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Please help for new created article Iqra Nadeem. Thanks.Waleed.P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.68.48.166 (talk) 17:44, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify, 22:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Reliable source

Dear User:Justice007, thanks for your message on my talk page. The following guideline will be of help to you in determining whether that video can serve as a reliable source: Wikipedia:Video links. I hope this helps! With regards, AnupamTalk 15:40, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks dear Anupam.Justice007 (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cardinal sources

Sorry, my friend, but "cardinal" is a routine adjective which can mean (with no religious meaning) "of the greatest importance; fundamental". Thus, my statement that Zaytuna College teaches from the cardinal sources of Islam -- the Qur'an and ahadith -- was eminently appropriate. Not to worry. I won't change your edit, which is fine too. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 03:40, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well dear, I know already meaning that you mentioned but here in the article, word "cardinal" creates the confusion, it depends not only one meaning, it is commonly related to religious meaning. There are many words with same meaning but where to use is different subject. I do realy neither want to go deep in this regard and nor thinking of your any bad faith. Please just take a look at these articles and sites. Cardinal (Catholicism), Cardinal (bird), The Cardinal

1 2 3. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 09:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying. We can disagree politely with no awkwardness or need to devote time. You are a fine editor. Thanks and best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shreya Ghoshal

I still don't see the problem here. The new source does support her birth date. The other source does support the "Day" honor. The comment about the picture is really old POV, and should be removed anyway. The added supporting text is better than just 'see also'... What else is there not to like? BollyJeff | talk 16:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on you talk page.Justice007 (talk) 17:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Hi Justice007. I didn't actually tag the article with those notices. It was done by User:TheRedPenOfDoom with this edit. I think those references probably count as reliable third party sources so I have removed the notability tag. The Wikify tag was replaced with Underlinked as the wikify tag is being replaced across Wikipedia as a whole. The underlinked means there should be more blue links in the article. I've also removed the BLP sources tag as the article has sources for most statements. Happy editing! Del♉sion23 (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied on your talk page.Justice007 (talk) 23:39, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article has been nominated for deleteion. You may provide your views about whether or not the subject meets the criteria outlined at WP:N by participating at the discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:53, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi ,save it and give protection to this awesome page

My dear Justice007 , please do not delete the page Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.Because Proff Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi]] is a loyal senior teacher.Please re write if possible but not to delete it.This page is helpful to education policy.Please dear Justice007 , Save Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.Please protect Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. Thanks Justice007 . Yours' --Hasbi syed (talk) 13:50, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are actual creater of great page Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Dear ! Don't delete this great page Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.This is a unique page.Please improve it but do not delete this marketing adjusted page.You are the actual writer and creater of this awesome page , named Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. Please save this page and take more protection in favour of world wide literary personality Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. Thanks! --Hasbi syed (talk) 13:56, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Justice007 the great ! Please safe and save Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Dear Justice007 you are the actual writer of noted thesis of Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.This is the best educational article from wikipedia english.My dear Justice007 you have thousands best educational article from wikipedia and you are the symbol of real education,peace,respect of humanities and wel editing for english wikipedia.It is requested you to please save the best literary article of Proffessor Doctor Syed Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi,which is the certified article of your great success also.Please show the photo of Prof.Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi , is a unique photo for wiki lovers also.May God live you long my dear Justice007. A lot of thanks dear! --Hasbi syed (talk) 01:06, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are the real friend of english wikipedia and Proff Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi , we are proud of you Sir !!

This is a cruel act which a person 'Wikipedia' of individual human rights is against policy. Mr. Justice 007 best knowledge, this paper is the creator and owner and their efforts to delete the bastard even care do not be jealous of his fire. wish your ego and ignorance of the ignorant, not scholars take revenge and English Wikipedia articles with the most 'Rush' does not hzf. Prof Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameed SahibDespite this knowledge, the knowledge of the dignity and value of editor with paper money is excellent references. Prof Mujeeb Hamid, the whole world knows, the work considers the wiki owner is unaware. Fraudster you are, in Wikipedia I strongly urge owners of our global paper to protect them from hackers, Prof. Syed Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameed Sahib Dr Allah gave children's education is the top attribute, the 'sury' and 'virtual' fact 'is' every two terms. Prof Mujeeb Zafar Hameed knowledge that the value of investments can not be in this world. several generations of Mujeeb Zafar Anwar known throughout the world and recognize. country Pakistan How lucky that here in ashes Mr Anwar Hussain Professor Mujeeb Hamid Sahib's personality of the ferment. Dear Prof Mujeeb Zafar Anwar al-Hamid and his family always kept intact. Amen! President of Pakistan (Islamabad)

File:Http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:King of Urdu Children Literature Proff Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.JPG
King of Pakistani Children literature Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Please use the inserted foto with article Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi.Thanks Sir! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hasbi syed (talk • contribs) 03:32, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My Dear please have the photo of Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi a new foto for english wikipedia only !

My dear please add this foto with article Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi. Thanks justiceoo7.This is free foto , only for wikipedia and wikimedia.

--Hasbi syed (talk) 04:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]


  • Hi Hasbi syed, first of all, no one is doing wrong, that dispute is in accordance to wiki-rules. We should discuss and it is being discussed. At deletion discussion all editors reach consensus. Please be cool, civil and wait the result and outcome of the discussion. I understand your concerns.

About the image, please again up-load that without any restrictions, giving permission as a copyright holder. (your own work). Your recent up-loaded image violate the policy, that is being requested for speedy deletion.Justice007 (talk) 09:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Justice :)

How are you doing? It's been a while...my studies are really getting tough, so I haven't even thought about Wikipedia for a long time...I hope everything is going well for you, although I see that you've semi-retired like me. :( I hope I can eventually come back, but it probably won't be for a few years, at this point. I'm sure you're glad to be out of college and stuff, but I'm just starting, haha. God bless :) Nolelover Talk·Contribs 19:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi dear, nice to see your comment, it was going good, but as a matter of my own principle, it is impossible to discuss with robots, because they don't have and are not able to use common sense. That's why now I am semi-retired. The articles I improved, are being spoiled, no one is interested to do constructive edits, there are too- much editors who devote their time to tagging the articles rather than improving those. Yes I am out of college but without a degree, because mentors are not having any qualification, so reliability is in question. Anyhow, I am sure you will achieve your goals as you desire. I realy miss you at wikipedia. I will be here just only to watch things off and on. God bless you too.Justice007 (talk) 14:52, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete awesome english wiki article Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi Thanks

Oh !!! Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi is the best article from wikipedia english.Please do not delete it.This awesome article has a huge traffic.Please further improve it with extra links and pages specially Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi's stories and poetry also.I appreciate Proff Dr Syed Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi who is the senior most writer and educationalist also.Please add Proff's new best photo also whis in past.Tanks a lot.

Personality and Work of Dr Proff Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Best Children Story of Prof Dr Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

--119.160.48.67 (talk) 09:39, 26 December 2012 (UTC) Please add these above mentioned external links Thanks my dear wiki editors.I love you all. Teena Smith Canada[reply]

Tom_Stienstra

re: [3]. it is still completely unclear what the merging of the papers has to do with Tom_Stienstra changing from baseball to writing.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok mentor, I have tried my best.Justice007 (talk) 14:21, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Vitti Fans

Hi there, we don't really know how to do it, but we thank you for helping keeping the page which has been created on our favorite singer Tony Vitti. When we heard the page we try to keep alive was subject of deletion, it was a pain in the heart. We appreciate it, whatever the end of this story. Wishing you a happy new year, Tony Vitti's fans family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.197.16.195 (talk) 23:29, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012 Wikification Barnstars!

The WikiProject Wikify Badge  
Thank you for your participation in the December 2012 drive! Also, Happy New Year! benzband (talk) 16:57, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Your work on the Joe Arridy article was splendid! It now looks much better then when I first started it. I like to make the base and then have others perfect it, a great example of why we have so many editors here Hell In A Bucket (talk) 02:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at Talk:Kashmir conflict.
Message added 10:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 10:12, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Would you comment.

Dear User:Justice007, I'd be happy to comment there for you. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 15:27, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 15:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Justice007. You have new messages at Talk:Kashmir conflict.
Message added 16:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mr T(Talk?) (New thread?) 16:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Vitti

Perhaps there has been some misunderstanding.

  • There are several places in France called Saint-Rémy.
  • The source for that sentence does not say which Saint-Rémy he was born in. Meanwhile the infobox says he was born in a different location; Lyon. I realise you are keen to hit the revert button to preserve your version of the article, but this version is bad, because a person cannot be born simultaneously in two different towns.
  • If we don't know what we're talking about, we shouldn't just say it anyway. This is supposed to be an encyclopædia, not a collection of text which looks kinda plausible.

bobrayner (talk) 18:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First, thanks for pointingout the error, I have corrected and second I knew When I wiki-linked the city, that was for me very difficult to decide to add proper name of the city, that's why I did not linked. The clarification needed template is for the phrase or sentence but not name of the persons or states or cities. May be you know better, if there is that description, please provide that, I would like to take a look at.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is it possible to find out which Saint-Rémy? bobrayner (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can realy not guess which one relevant is connected with a subject's birth place. If you can, please help in this regard. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 10:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thank you for editing the article -- Lubna Rizvi 21:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lubna which one you mean, I am editing more articles at a time.Anyhow, thanks.Justice007 (talk) 21:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lol it's Rebecca Masterton-- Lubna Rizvi 21:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that is my pleasure, no problem and again thanks.Justice007 (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. I'm noting that you've been warned a few times so far about assuming good faith like the Tony Vitti AFD when accusing another editor of socking, if you want to know why I posted a COI tag on Rebecca Masterton you should ask me. There is indeed an issue that you can actually find if you take the time to read through the diffs [[4]]. Where else have I incorrectly tagged an article as you see it? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And as far as the Tony Vitti article tag [[5]] part of the reason I tagged it was the Anon IP statement. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:30, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

For all your hard work! Thank you so much! شكريه 

Lubna Rizvi 18:52, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for that and خوش آمدید. Justice007 (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage archives.

We actually archive these notices all the time. Even on article talkspace. See Jehovah's Witness talkpage as an example. You can always start a new thread if you had other concerns but I have everything set to archive and I believe that particular conversation is in Archive 6 on my page. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I understand your point, no problem.Justice007 (talk) 00:14, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In this case I understand what you were saying because when I looked that was not part of the archive, I will put it there manually. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 00:18, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 00:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Vitti : end

Lol. Here my last word for this story. I just went to the page of "Koui2" and "Azurfrog", they were two "wikibros" looking for the end of the Vitti's page ! You can check their discussion after the deletion, they're just loling as two kids for their exploit. That's life. The thing you purposed me for undeletion is not allowed after a deletion, an admin told it to me. I won't fight, they are just submiting my other pages to deletion too : La Grande Battle (french wiki) etc... Don't have the time to bother me on a project like wikipedia if rules are respected this way. The Boss of wikipedia is always sending messages for asking money from users, that's probably why I'll never pay a f*cking cent to this mafia ruled by a few WoW players (exepted you as I can see, but you're not the majority).

Anyway, I thank you again for this thing, it took a lot, you wrote lines and lines when they were just giving some words, contradicting themselves etc... Anyway, wishing you a happy new year.

Frenchytv (talk) 23:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask administrator who closed the discussion, user Sjakkalle (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Make a request in a civil way. There are more possibilities for request. I hope this helps.Justice007 (talk) 00:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I wrote something on the Sjakkalle (talk · contribs) talk page. Thank you Justice007 Frenchytv (talk) 00:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Hi, sorry for this and that, I'm the one who didn't count properly. --Koui² (talk) 11:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation contra Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mujeeb Zafar Anwar Hameedi

Do not repost articles that have been deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion; it is considered disruptive and can get your account blocked. I compared your repost against the previously deleted version and did not find any substantial differences, and so it was subject to being speedy deleted as a recreation of content that was deleted pursuant to a deletion discussion. The way to challenge this is at Deletion Review, where you would be expected to show that the AFD was closed incorrectly or improperly, or that there is new information that, in this case, would establish that the subject is notable according to Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 23:27, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness, I believe (I haven't checked, but I'm basing this on previous discussions with Justice007) that at least one new source had been added. Justice007, I'm sorry that your article got deleted, especially when I know how much work you put into improving the previous version. However, I agree with the deletion - the level of disruption caused by Hameedi's "supporters" (probably just one guy in Karachi, judging by the IPs, but a very dedicated guy!) was substantial, and only died down after the article was removed (aside from one particularly abusive tirade that got copy-pasted to several talkpages before the IP was blocked). I'm not advocating this as a reason for deletion, but given the borderline notability, Wikipedia is better served by not having an article on Hameedi - less Hameedispam means we can get on with more productive tasks.
On an unrelated note, nice work on the Jaine Green article! Yunshui 雲‍水 23:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page.Justice007 (talk) 00:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! User "Ronald zh" keeps deleting my image gallery under 'Indian Coinage'. I explained the gallery was essential to understand the art motifs on coins. Moreover, certain University students in US and elsewhere are using the resource for their study/research purposes and found my image gallery very useful. -ditto- curators from numismatic museums of universities. How do I get him to stop deleting my images? Grateful for your suggestion/help. Rgds. Meluha66 (talk) 09:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, the {{help me}} tag is usually only used on your talk page when you ask your question, and isn't needed when asking a specific editor a question as you appear to be doing here. Secondly in regard to your actual question, your best bet is to discuss it with the user directly, at their talk page, or on the article talk page, remember to assume good faith. If you need anymore help please re add the {{help me}} tag to your talk page. -- Patchy1 09:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Oprea

Hi! I have been involved in editing the article that was replaced by Biruitorul and then wikified by you recently. I am quite unhappy with the present product because it is very incomplete and it also skips the beginning of his career (in the early 80s) and jumps to him being banned in 1987. In the talk of that article I inserted numerous references to the fact that he was notable before he was banned, but that's not the point. I am trying to use the present article and add relevant details, but these are being deleted. I could put the references directly where I insert a statement, but it seems to me irrelevant as if someone has an agenda in keeping this article as sub-standard. I have already given the relevant info in the talk in the last two weeks. I am not sure who is in charge and how to go about it, I saw your page and I believe that you actually are impartial and honest. Unfortunately I am not so sure about others who deal with this page.Could you please advise? Thank youSensei2004 (talk) 03:48, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sensei, it seems to me a kind of ownership, I made the best layout of the article, but some editors gaming the system and I believe here double standard exists. You can take the disput to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard and discuss there to resolve or compromise the matter. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 09:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment. Of course, I also feel ownership on stuff I inserted and I don't want to see it deleted for no reason. The problem is that the article as it stands is missing many details and omits many books and as such it diminishes his extensive work and I brought much evidence for this and waited quietly for it to be inserted. It is someone life achievements at play and I happen to be familiar with his work. I also was careful not to break into User:Biruitorul's edit, but only inserted stuff around it to complement it. (Haven't finished of course). But at the moment it seems to me that User:MSJapan is the one who deleted my text, not User:Biruitorul. And I know that a few of the people who handle that page have an axe to grind against Oprea (for reasons unknown to me). I can see this from their reactions in the past. I also don't understand why the previous article was replaced with the new one just when I finished inserting the missing references to all the statements. But I was ready to accept the new edit, I just want to make it correct. Unfortunately I see that dispute resolution might be the only way.14:06, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Sensei2004 (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please advise if this should be taken to the regular DPN or to BLP dispute noticeboard?I have waited a few more days but nothing has happened. ThanksSensei2004 (talk) 20:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on The Big Bang Theory

Just for an fyi I own The Complete Season Four DVD set of the show and can verify that the information I posted about the music video is correct as the jacket that comes with the DVD advertises the information and the feature can be found on Disc 2 of the DVD set. Amazon.com also supports there is a music video and that it is on both the DVD and Blu-ray. http://www.amazon.com/Big-Bang-Theory-Complete-Fourth/dp/B003L77G6A/ http://www.amazon.com/The-Big-Bang-Theory-Complete/dp/B003L77G6K/

  • In Special Feature section of Amazon.com it clearly reads: "The Barenaked Ladies on Big Bang Theory Featurette - Having created one of the greatest theme songs in recent history, the Barenaked Ladies bring it home when they come to the set of the Big Bang Theory to record a music video for the song. Featuring an interview with the band, behind the scenes footage of the filming of an episode, and clips from the new video itself, this piece carries with it all of the fun and energy you could expect from both the band and the show."

I have readded all this and corrected the information on the release date of this being released as a single with both iTunes and Amazon.com. 184.58.0.27 (talk) 03:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Justice, are you around? Please check in - I'd like to hear from you. LadyofShalott 03:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oh my God, I shocked, who wishes that?, I just login and first I always review that page, if there is no any vandal, I check directly IP address that is from United States State/Region: Massachusetts City: Holden. A bit realy nervous. I am ok and healthly and enjoying life. Thanks lady for your feelings.Justice007 (talk) 16:23, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks both of you. I taking break to have a cup of warm melk because outside is too much cold and vandalism made me more cold. Ya Drmies

eindelijk mannelijk koning. Justice007 (talk) 16:54, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013 Wikification Drive

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

Nomination of Nandini Sahu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nandini Sahu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nandini Sahu (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Bill william comptonTalk 17:04, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Katrina Kaif

Hello! I suppose you are aware of two conflicting theories on Kaif's background, mentioned in the main article. Unless a source confirms self identificaiton by Katrina, adding contents from that src on her background is an evident violation of WP:BLP. That being the case, do you believe in keeping Ayesha Shroff's version when Kaif's self-id on her background is different? Can you explain this? Hari7478 (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on the talk page of Katrina Kaif. Justice007 (talk) 09:25, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and Salaam

I hope you are enjoying your break. Whenever you get back to Wiki can you please look into my sandbox and suggest me whether the article meets up the notability criteria. Regards, -- Lubna Rizvi 14:47, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at Katrina Kaif

FYI, Surya Nair aka Suri is a new editor, struggling to learn how to do things properly. I've been helping her via OTRS. She didn't know how to do a reference, I've given her an example. She may yet again struggle, I hope you will offer her a helping hand.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 13:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 16:37, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013 Wikification awards

The Working Wikifier's Barnstar
For finishing ninth place on the leaderboard during the February 2013 Wikification drive, with a count of 2 articles, Justic007 (tied with Miniapolis and HueSatLum), you are hereby awarded the Working Wikifier's Barnstar. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Oh, is this the Top Secret room? I had no idea... (talk) 13:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

Hey,
We are having some problems with Jinnah's religion. Can you comment on the talk page so that we can end this debate once and for all. Thanks
--Inlandmamba (fruitful thought) 21:17, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Hawkins (Columnist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikify April Drive

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's April Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog size by over 500 articles and we need your help! Hard-working participants in the drive will receive awards for their contributions. If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks!

-- Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:07, 31 March 2013 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Wikify.[reply]

All articles require sources

re your edit summary and action here ALL articles require in line sources. see WP:V and WP:LIST and Wikipedia:BLP#Categories.2C_lists_and_navigation_templates.

A claim that all the content is sourced in the target landing articles is 1) irrel as our policies require the sourcing to be in the particular article where the claim is made, and also 2) patently false. there are dozens of the landing page articles that do not have appropriate reliable sources that identify the subject as being someone who meets the list criteria. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:50, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi RedPen I always thought that you are a experienced editor, but what you are mentioning here, it seems to me your experiernce is not justifying the concerns you are raising. Please consult dispute with someone else who knows better than you. In the list no any red link exists and no any content is to be cite, it is very ridiculous when you add the wiki-links in the articles, and then templating "citation needed", similarly the lists of the articles are wiki-links/articles, there is no need of any tags. What you have mentioned the rules, I do not see anything relating or supporting your personal likeness. I hope this helps, and please discuss the dispute on the talk page of the article, so that other editors can give thier opinion too.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I agree with TheRedPenOfDoom; it's a very long list with lots of claims about poets (including claims about living people) but it has zero sources. That's a problem. Strictly speaking, even just grouping together poets by language (or ethnicity) is original research unless you can provide a source which groups them similarly. It would be unhelpful to axe every unsourced line in the list - then there would be nothing in the article - but I think that following our verifiability policy is the key to fixing the article's flaws and improving it further. bobrayner (talk) 15:03, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Bobrayner and thanks.Justice007 (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

stop vandlization

My edit is true authentic completely refrenced according to guidelines of wiki.you are reverting it with out any reason.it is vendlization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Am Not New (talk • contribs) 07:42, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you questioned my sources

see Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri there are many other things refrenced from official site.BTW For those who were questioning my sources added another refrence from zemtv.com.Dil e Muslim talk 16:03, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mention of Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri issue at ANI

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 08:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Nandini Sahu

Information icon A tag has been placed on Nandini Sahu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Jussychoulex (talk) 17:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Birbal Jha

kindly read through reference links given for social title in Birbal Jha. It sounds good and justified.thanks

Then Jerico

Dear Justice007, I hope you are well. I'll be very grateful if you can please help me keep the Then Jerico page neutral and referenced. One abusive and nasty editor -- whom has previously been blocked for sockpuppetry on this page -- keeps restoring unverified material. He curses and attacks me (including racially) when I try. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 20:21, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are already experienced editors involved, anyhow I will keep an eye on it. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 09:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Shamim Hashimi

Hi Justice,

I am a new editor on wikipedia, Shamim Hashimi is my 2nd article I wanted to confirm about standard of verification source the 2nd reference source is an online government library where the biography of Shamim Hashimi is available at "http://connemara.tnopac.gov.in/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=142451" so there are two sources of online government library and other 4 online libraries. And can I use the reference of the urdu magazines like: Mubahisa, Shayari, Ajkal, shair, rang o boo, funoon etc.? Please let me know if will this help me to keep this Article on Wikipedia? Thanks and regards, Rumi KhawarRumikhawar (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look at all sources later. Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 15:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For Saleem Kausar and your other recent contributions :). I have also given you the "autopatrolled" user right. Ironholds (talk) 16:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Iqbal

I just feel that "British India (now Pakistan)" is not quite accurate. It's either "British India" (as what now consists of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh), "Pakistan" on its own, or perhaps maybe a reference to the modern day states of Pakistan. Just seems a bit inaccurate. The Madras (talk) 14:56, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, you are right, indeed British India, we cannot say now Pakistan---I did not see, I thought ofter "Lahore, British India". I realise my blunder. Especially Thanks to Darkness Shines.Cheers.Justice007 (talk) 15:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I'll have a look at it now :) The Madras (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Najeeb Haroon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Najeeb Haroon''' ([[Urdu]]: ''' ﻧﺠﻴﺐ ﮨﺎﺭﻭﻥ''' (January 1, 1948), is a senior [[politician]] and a [[civil engineer]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:10, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013 Wikification Drive

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Small Token of My Appreciation For You

The Biography Barnstar
For your exceptional work on Biographical articles. Please accept this a small token of my appreciation. I know your work is way batter than this award. Keep it up dude & Stay blessed Crown Prince  Talk


Further reading

FYI, further reading should never be folded into the "References" section: the definition of further reading is that it is material that specifcially has not been used as a reference. Yworo (talk) 20:58, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Yworo. Noted. Justice007 (talk) 21:07, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Justice007, Can you please research more about of Birbal Jha and do justice to the page devoted to him? I'm a fan of him and everything good about him should be displayed on the page. Thanks, Darrenmong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darrenmong (talk • contribs) 04:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Birbal Jha

Respected Justice007, I had made a request to you to do a justice to the page for Birbal Jha. I had given strong links and references in support of my editing on the page. You seem to be biased with Birbal Jha. Kindly do some researches on Birbal Jha and add more information about him for a good cause. Regards Darrenmong: Darrenmong (talk) 17:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Wikify: November Newsletter and December Drive

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To unsubscribe remove your username from this list. EdwardsBot (talk) 22:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Talk:Ahmed Ali

Talk:Ahmed Ali, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Ahmed Ali and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:Ahmed Ali during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Technopat (talk) 13:39, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 03:44, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Celebrate Your Life

The article Celebrate Your Life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK, sourced to a single review (or press release?) - Kenya Star and AniNews articles are identical.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Celebrate Your Life for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Celebrate Your Life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrate Your Life until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 08:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Extended bibliography for Birbal Jha?

Do you happen to know any of Jha's other titles? I'd like to be able to include some other titles in there. I suppose that all 20+ might be a bit bulky even with {{Multicol}}, but it'd be nice to include some others in there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:06, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • First of all thanks for improving very nicely the article, it was a disruptive matter, you have solved, I do not know more titles of the subject, only another article British Lingua has been edited several times in the way of puffery, may you take a look at and improve that too. Thanks once again. Justice007 (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Justice 007, Kindly have a look at the end portion of the article on  the link below and do justice  for the page of Birbal Jha I had edited and you undid. The news article is published on the most reputed newspaper in IndiaDarrenmong (talk) 11:05, 10 March 2014 (UTC)  Thanks Darrenmong[reply]

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/patna/Bank-employee-loses-job-due-to-poor-English/articleshow/31745221.cms

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Justice007&oldid=598968140"