Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dpapa187 (talk | contribs) at 11:41, 26 June 2014 (→‎A.G Leventis Nigeria PLC: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Zimbabwenewsday

The page should not be delated -Sendasambulo (talk) 19:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evidently it should, and was. And if you are asking for undeletion...
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Alexf (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Malaria Day in the Americas

I received a notification that the page [Malaria Day in the Americas] had been deleted for violating G-11: Unambiguous advertising. I would like to say that this article piece has no intent to advertise or self-promote in any way. The Malaria Day in the Americas article is unbiased and has multiple third party sources in which i wil provide for you. The reason for attempting to publish this article on Wikipedia was to provide information about this particular subject that no known information is given about.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Natsnet23 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. If the intent was not advertising, it was certainly publicity, which amounts to the same thing. Wikipedia is not a publicity platform. Also, Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about some noble cause. I suggest using Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit an article on this topic. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:14, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Limited Runs

I, Jamiwr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jamiwr (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. The article was only three sentences, there were zero sources, and it was promotional in tone. No benefit to the Wikipedia project in restoring this. Please start over, using Wikipedia:Golden rule as a guide for whot is expected for an article. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:18, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Novocastrians RFC

I, 92.30.170.225, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.30.170.225 (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Anderson (filmmaker)

Please restore edit history for this recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 21:39, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Graeme Bartlett. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:09, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr. Ben Fong

I, Sourcenetworks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sourcenetworks (talk) 22:32, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ottawa Fishing Festival

I, Sourcenetworks, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sourcenetworks (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vivartana, the ICFP Kolkata Academic Theme

I, Bidisha Sarkar Datta, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bidisha Sarkar Datta (talk) 01:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I had submitted the request for undeletion of this page a month back. However I am not able to figure out what is the status of that request. Kindly guide. Appologies for inonviniences created, if any.

Not done, as previously declined. See Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 135#Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Vivartana, the ICFP Kolkata Academic Theme. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jesus Is My SuperHero (band)

I, Ashishben, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashishben (talk) 07:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - no need to restore this draft, the article exists at JIMSH (band). I have also made a redirect from Jesus Is My SuperHero (band). JohnCD (talk) 10:04, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I had carelessly not checked the mainspace article, which did not meet Wikipedia's requirements and has been deleted. You can work on this draft, but please read WP:Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. It makes no difference that this is a non-profit and a Good Cause: the question is whether you can show references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to demonstrate WP:Notability to the standard explained at WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 14:55, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

JIMSH (band)

this should not be deleted because this is an non-profit band helping many slums,kids.And have nobody to support, only wikipedia can help us and then click the "Save page" button below -Ashishben (talk) 07:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article has not been deleted, see JIMSH (band). JohnCD (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It likely soon will be deleted, though, as CSD A7. Apparently the article was on AFC and was then deleted as G13, and the author simply posted it to main space. The G13 AFC should have been restored and the main space version deleted. We can still do that. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:07, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Amatulic: ah, sorry about that, I should have checked the article and the history. I have done as you suggest - deleted the article and restored the AfC draft, see above. JohnCD (talk) 14:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jesus Is My SuperHero (band). I wish Ashishben luck with that; at this point it seems unlikely that the band will meet WP:BAND criteria. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The PACE Centre, Aylesbury

Significant new material to add that will result in publication — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sansian (talk • contribs) 12:27, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, because there is nothing to do. The article never existed in main space, and it hasn't been deleted from Articles for Creation. Feel free to improve it and re-submit. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Best You Magazine

I do not have a copy of the work I did on this magazine, and would like to improve it. The magazine is currently seeking to improve its press recognition, and The Best You Magazine therefore hopes to be able to come back to you meeting your notability criteria once this is achieved. You are welcome to email it to me, if that is more suitable than restoring. However you do it, thank you for your help. -90.244.200.207 (talk) 13:50, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We can't email to anonymous IP addresses. However....
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
You really need to remove those garbage sources and add in some better ones. Youtube videos and blogs are not acceptable. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andy Lakey

Dayfornightmm (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wang Haibo (2)

I, Jackbrownie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jackbrownie (talk) 23:42, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Upon looking at the page, it looks like this is a page for a fictional character that someone created for a game. It doesn't look like it's a specific character along the lines of say, Solid Snake, and I can't see where this specific character has received the coverage necessary to meet notability guidelines. WP:NFOOTY does not apply to fictional characters and most will never receive the necessary coverage to merit their own articles. I really get the impression that this character was created by the game player as opposed to the game company itself, which will make it even more difficult to find sources for notability. Everything I found on a search came up as primary for the most part and I didn't find anything that would really back up notability for the character. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:18, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wang Haibo

I forgot my login details and was unable to login but i've now retrieved my user information -Jackbrownie (talk) 23:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackbrownie (talk • contribs) 23:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: For this one, are you looking for a specific edit history? The problem here is that it looks like at one point this page was deleted as an attack page, so I'd have to know what you're specifically looking for. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done Upon looking at the AfC article, it became clear that this is not about a person in real life but a game character that seems to have been created by a player. It doesn't appear to be based on a real person and there's nothing to show that the character is notable enough to merit an entry. Given that part of the article's deleted history was an attack page, I don't think it's appropriate to re-create an article history for a non-notable fictional character. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FK Mladost Bački Petrovac

I'll fix article you can move under the prefix User:Jolicnikola/ -Jolicnikola (talk) 01:26, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ViGna gaNapati.JPG

32 PD-art from the 19th century Sritattvanidhi were uploaded by the user. This one was somehow deleted. See Thirty-two forms of Ganesha. -Redtigerxyz Talk 06:02, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redtigerxyz, the file was deleted because the description did not disclose the source of the image. I can't restore it without that information, else it would simply be deleted again. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:23, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Amatulić, the 32 images were uploaded as a series by the user. First of the series, File:BAlagaNapati1.bmp.jpg has the information. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, file restored. Please check to make sure I got it right. You may want to tag it with {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}}, seeing that File:BAlagaNapati1.bmp.jpg is already there. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:53, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Amatulić, Thanks a lot. Moved to commons.--Redtigerxyz Talk 05:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ashwin Bhosle/sandbox

I, Ashwin Bhosle, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ashwin Bhosle (talk) 08:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nascotours S.A.E

This article is created just to make awareness about the company not for promotional purpose, also we are still working on improving it. Thank you -Peternasco (talk) 12:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done. Not only was the article created for promotional purposes ("to make awareness about the company" is a statement of publicity intent), but it was also a copyright violation. Peternasco, please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest because you clearly have a conflict of interest. When you are done reading that, you should disclose your conflict of interest on your user page. After that, you may submit the article (without copy-pasting text from another website) to Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Do not attempt to create the article directly in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ciaran McKnulty

McKnulty is a well reported Manx footballer, who has played in a recognized league on championship teams and has recieved awards and substantial recognition. -Albiet (talk) 14:01, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Manx League is not a recognised league in line with Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability Kivo (talk) 11:46, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BetMoose

Requesting the page source back - will improve and repost -Gloomfrost (talk) 18:52, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Gloomfrost/BetMoose. DO NOT repost back into main article space. Use the 'submit' button at the top of the draft article to submit it via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:15, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Swisstouches Hotels & Resorts

I, Jbufman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jbufman (talk) 09:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Michael (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

6/21/2014

To the Administrator: 

   I would like to request a motion to undelete the following files that I have uploaded for Lito Mayo's page which were all the found items in "Gallery of Work" section of the artist's stub:


File:Shell 1976.tif File:Untitled Native Face 1976.tif File:Maskara 2 (1976).tif File:Mukha (Face) 1976.tif File:Butiki (Lizard).tif File:Insekto (Insect) 1976.tif File:Hayop (Animal) 1976.tif File:Temptation 1976.tif

The reasoning for the deletion was the Copyright ownership of the images.

Please restore these items. The images are essential to the academic integrity of the wikipedia page for Manolito Mayo. I am giving permission to use these images publicly in Wikipedia. I am the owner of the copyrights of these works by my father, Manolito Mayo. When he passed away, I have been granted all the legal rights to share, publish, or use all or any portions of his works. I inherited the sum of all his works when he died in May 4, 1983 in the Philippines.

Furthermore, I will be adding new images and references for the Lito Mayo in the future to broaden the scope and legitimacy of his influential works.


Regards,


--Michael (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC) Michael Mayo --Michael (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • the deletion reason includes this: "If you are the copyright holder/author and/or have authorization to publish the file, please email our OTRS team to get the file restored". Secondly it looks like files were deleted off commons, so we cannot help you here. Try to email the OTRS as requested. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:10, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Charbel habchi

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Charbelfvkc (talk) 21:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Westshore Town Centre

Requesting refund of the edit history.  Article was deleted today at AfD, and an attempt has been made to talk to the closing admin, link without getting a reply.  Meanwhile, another editor has restored the title as a redirect.  -Unscintillating (talk) 01:42, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anybody can create a redirect over a title previously deleted by AFD. How does that invalidate the AFD decision? The article was deleted only today, and the same day you're posting a REFUND request without following proper procedure? Wait for the admin to respond, and go to WP:DRV if the response is not to your liking. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:24, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The admin has a semi-retired template posted, and is typically gone for days at a time.  So I don't expect to get a timely response there, in fact it has already been more than 24 hours.  I didn't come here to suggest that this was totally non-controversial.  However, I suspect that a refund is less controversial than a DRV.  The people here would know that better than I.  And I was hoping to get a decision, one way or the other.  Thank you, Unscintillating (talk) 00:03, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
"Already" more than 24 hours? When I post a question on someone's talk page, I typically expect a reply within a week. I'm often gone for 2 or 3 days at a time myself. There is no expectation or obligation for any editor, including administrators, to attend to Wikipedia on a daily basis. This is something we do in our spare time. Many of us aren't students anymore, but professionals with real-life demands of career and family. What is the hurry? ~Amatulić (talk) 14:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't realize I'd be asking something difficult.  I will withdraw the request if you want, or continue to wait for a decision.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Unscintillating, it isn't difficult to restore an article history. It's basically a handful of clicks. That isn't the issue here.
An administrator won't unilaterally countermand an AFD decision of another administrator without first having a discussion with that administrator or in an appropriate forum like WP:DRV. That's a Wikipedia policy, summarized briefly at WP:RAAA. Countermanding an AFD decision isn't an uncontroversial act... and this page is for requesting uncontroversial restorations only.
Secondly, article history is routinely restored in cases where it's obvious something changed (common examples you can find on this page concern articles re-created from scratch for individuals who became notable since the original articles got deleted). On the other hand, the act of simply creating a redirect doesn't negate the AFD decision. Wikipedia has established procedures for this, namely (a) talk to the administrator, and if the response is unsatisfactory, (b) take it to WP:DRV.
I hope this explanation makes sense.
FWIW, I have brought a case to DRV after waiting a month for the deleting admin to respond. Wikipedia does't operate on a schedule. Things happen as they happen. Just be patient. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:49, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patricia Gucci

Gregoryjlee (talk) 06:49, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I note that there is an OTRS ticket related to the donation of the subject's website under a license compatible with the one we use, however keep in mind that you still have to prove that she meets the notability guidelines for inclusion. Otherwise the submission will be declined again. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adonnis

Artist has been featured on MTV reality show, recently releasing an album and multiple music videos. -License2Kill (talk) 07:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review..
This article was also deleted last year from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adonnis. We can userfy it for you if you want, but with both an AFD delete and A7 delete, no way we'll restore it to main space. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:06, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/the Funeral Honors

I, DamonWalker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DamonWalker (talk) 08:08, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. GB fan 12:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thejb4u

this is my personal page and then click the "Save page" button below -Thejb4u (talk) 09:51, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 cannot be restored by request here. Wikipedia is not a personal web hosting service. Use Facebook for that. Also see Wikipedia:Autobiography -- you should not write articles about yourself, and even if you do, you shouldn't post them directly to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 13:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

James Moran (ambassador)

I, 158.169.40.7, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 158.169.40.7 (talk) 11:28, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
The article James Moran (ambassador) remains deleted in main space. Please work on the AFC version instead. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dariush Kashani

Hi there, I'm initiating a request to restore the article for the Iranian-American actor, Dariush Kashani. Citing numerous TV/Film credits on IMDB [1], a recent review in the NYTimes for The Off-Broadway play The Happiest Song Plays Last [2]...some recent news from Playbill.com [3] and an overall google search provides more info. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.122.12.79 (talk) 13:29, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. While it is possible that this actor has achieved notability since Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dariush Kashani was closed in 2008, the sources you offered fail to convince that the AFD decision should be overturned. IMDB credits do not confer notability, the New York Times piece gives Kashani only a trivial mention, the Playbill piece gives him a trivial mention, and Google searches are meaningless for establishing notability. You have offered no significant, reliable, independent coverage about this person.
You need to talk to the deleting administrator MBisanz first, and if the admin will not overturn the deletion, then you must take your case to Wikipedia:Deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Synthwave

Genre of music article was deleted due to bias, genre has gained exposure recently due to the film Drive, and the games Far Cry Blood Dragon and Hotline Miami. In the deletion discussion, more points were made for notability, the main contention, and no counterpoints were offered, and yet the article was deleted anyways. -Mfgreth (talk) 18:41, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synthwave, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Dennis Brown (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:59, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Telecom Europe Satellite Ltd.

The site is under construction and will be in future the work reveal about internet topics: light and shadow in the internet security system -80.108.226.89 (talk) 21:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user NawlinWiki (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Please us Wikipedia:Articles for creation to submit articles on topics with which you have an association. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cyclic corrosion testing

OTRS ticket:2014061610008596 allows using http://www.ascott-analytical.com/salt-spray-or-cct.html under cc-by-sa-30 and/or GFDL license terms -Ankry (talk) 08:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I'll leave it to someone else to look at the ticket, but I'll warn you ahead of time: this will need some pretty big editing to put it more in layman's terms. It reads as a little too technical at times and really needs some serious editing for flow. That's kind of the big unsaid thing about using copyvio: even if the original content is given up as fair use, 99.9% of the time the content will need to be re-written anyway in order to meet our writing guidelines. Given that it's taken from a company's website, odds are it will also need to be edited to ensure that it doesn't read as overly promotional. I don't see the company's name listed in the article, but it is a little "yay, CCT" at various points. That's completely reasonable on the company's website, but on here we need it to be more neutral and encyclopedic. I just feel that at some point this would need to be completely re-written, so I really think that it would save more time if you were to re-write it in your own words, and if you get someone from one of the applicable WikiProjects to help you with tone, sourcing, and flow. Articles that are cut and pasted from another website are usually some of the most challenged articles on Wikipedia and the ones that remain are almost always re-written to meet standards and to avoid the usual issues that arise from cut/pasting from somewhere else. (IE, you'll always have someone tagging it as copyvio, advertising, or as a conflict of interest, as well as flow, NPOV, encyclopedic, and layman's terms. It's always easier to just re-write it. I can't stress this enough.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:15, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tokyogirl79: for clarification, the requester is the OTRS agent, not the author of the article. The author is apparently an appointed representative of Ascot Analytical Equipment Ltd, who has released the page http://www.ascott-analytical.com/salt-spray-or-cct.html to the Wikimedia Foundation under the two free licenses, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 license and GNU Free Documentation License.
If this were in main article space, I'd probably object to restoring it, but as long as it's in Draft space, it's a reasonable request, since the article was deleted as G12 and no other reason. I'm in a rush at the moment, so I'll get to this later today if nobody else does. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:33, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have no true objection to it, but I just worry sometimes that working from a pre-existing article (as opposed to re-writing it while using the company's page as a source) just makes it harder to re-write the article or fix things that need to be done. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, draft article restored and properly tagged. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:26, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ron G Holland

Ron is a genuine author who has been published for 35 years, by a major publisher (Harper Collins) and all of the citations that Wikipedia have requested have been supplied. "Save page" button below -92.26.6.13 (talk) 12:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The article has a very, very promotional tone at times and would need to be completely re-written to meet our guidelines. I did look at the sources and I have to share in the PRODer's concern that the sources would not be enough to show a depth of coverage, especially since they were from a specific point in time. We'd also need to be able to verify the sources a little and that the editor could not pull up enough sources to assert notability is also a big concern. I'm familiar with the editor in question (User:Bonadea) and if she couldn't find sources then that is pretty telling, as she is a hard worker. I'm really not sure that Holland would pass notability guidelines if this were to be restored and put through a formal AfD, and I think that deletion would be inevitable. The problem is that just being published through a notable publisher is not enough to pass notability guidelines. There are a lot of authors who can make these claims, some of whom are on the NYT's bestselling list, but has not received enough coverage to merit an article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 14:23, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ChinaNetCenter

These are public articles from other sources which are already in Wikipedia"Save page" button below -Mileweb2014 (talk) 18:08, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The problem here is that the latest version of the article did not have any content. It was just a collection of links to various places. Of the other versions that were deleted, they all had issues with the article reading as promotional. What I'd recommend is that you create the company page via WP:AfC. Not only will this give you more time to work on the article, but you would also be able to get some feedback from people when you submit it. Creating articles in the mainspace can be a tricky thing, as you would have to make a fairly complete, neutral article in what's really a pretty short amount of time. That's why I personally recommend AfC, as it would give you more time to work on the article and learn the basic guidelines, and so on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:57, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Circle Theater of New York

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 207.29.44.2 (talk) 18:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The AfC creation was very, very promotional- so much so that you will have to re-write the entire article from scratch to meet our guidelines for neutrality. It also reads like it was taken directly from a press release or some other WP:COPYVIO type source. I have no problem with you making a new entry, but the previously deleted version was so unambiguously promotional that I'm actually a little surprised that it wasn't deleted as such when the previous person declined it at AfC. I don't mean to sound harsh, just trying to emphasize that it would be better if you were to start from scratch and try to make it better fit our WP:NPOV policy. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:02, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warka water

Warka water is a humanitarian project, I am not promoting or selling any product; I don't understand why my article is subject to speedy deletion. You can kindly find articles about Warka water in the following links: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/this-tower-pulls-drinking-water-out-of-thin-air-180950399/?no-ist http://www.wired.com/2014/03/warka-water-africa/?mbid=social_fb http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-03/31/warka-water-ethiopia I wil be waiting for your response Best regards Andrea Awaida -Andreaawaida (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is not yet deleted, but it is very promotional. Your links help to show importance, but the style of writing and what is presented is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please stick to the facts and not try to make the readers want to support it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:58, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good heavens, that isn't an encyclopedia article, that's a promotional brochure. It's deleted now.
Andreaawaida, please do not re-create this article in main space. Use Wikipedia:Articles for creation instead. You clearly need some practice before we can accept an article from you in main article space. At Articles for Creation, your article will be evaluated by a neutral reviewer prior to acceptance. And you'll have more time to work on it rather than worrying about it being speedily deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Marching Virginians

The Marching Virginians · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This article contained a lot of good information about a large student group at Virginia Tech. It was a good starting point for people wanting to learn more about the civilian band at Virginia Tech, a much newer group than the Highty Tightys. The group is heavily involved in community outreach and a large part of the Virginia Tech sports traditions. The page also had information on a lot of internal traditions that not many know about but make the group so very special. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skanetic (talk • contribs) 00:00, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please address User:RadioFan's concerns given in the proposed deletion: Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. References provided are to a single ESPN article, a letter to the editor of the student newspaper, and the university page promoting the group. I've also notified them in case they want to nominate the article for deletion by discussion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:41, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Labor Camp-Musical Group

The page was deleted because the reviewer believes the band is not notable when the band members and producers are all listed in other Wiki pages. These were referenced in posted article. The article is indicating the status of the musicians involved, from "Nip Drivers" and Rosemary's Billygoat" -Disklxik (talk) 00:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no, none of the members actually have their own Wikipedia articles, and of the two former bands mentioned that contributed members to this band, only Nip Drivers has its own article. WP:BAND criteria don't appear to be met. Also, you need to make your case to the deleting admin, not here. So...
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Anna Liza A. Ramos

She is a good person so that I create her a wiki page I dont promote any product Dr. Marmelo Villanueva Abante (talk) 09:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. Articles deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#A7 are not eligible for restoration by request on this page. Contact the deleting administrator Jimfbleak. Furthermore, the article was promotional in tone, reading more like a personal bio in a university publication than a Wikipedia article. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

R.D. Gardi Medical College ,Ujjain

Page has been deleted for the violation of G11 ,But page contains completely Neutral Point of View Article contains Correct and verifiable figures Google Map's official recognition and Links from Official Government Authority websites and Official website of the college itself, The facilities like WIFI is Clearly stated as NOT AVAILABLE , Qulaity of Mess is clearly stated as Lower than Average ,for the recreation room "TV ONLY in some hostel" is cleraly stated so it is not considered as Advertising ,And By deleting this page wikipedia Lacks Important Article about one of the Important Medical colleges of India , So This PAge should Restored back -MedicalFacts (talk) 14:17, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done. It was indeed promotional, using non-neutral language, such as describing the institution as "premier" and touting its facilities with unnecessary details that would be more appropriate in an advertising brochure. You are welcome to try again at Wikipedia:Articles for creation, but don't re-post this to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lindsay Jones

I, 71.105.91.13, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 71.105.91.13 (talk) 17:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking for additional sources to improve my submission. Please undelete. -71.105.91.13 (talk) 17:06, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MDP Haruge

I, ShumbaGong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ShumbaGong (talk) 17:37, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did'nt recieve a notification to my email about deleting my article. Please undelete it. thank you! "Save page" button below -ShumbaGong (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Admins are not obligated to inform you via email about the deletion of an article. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (It needs a lot of work) --S Philbrick(Talk) 21:23, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2000charge

CJbrian (talk) 23:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC) Creating Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2000charge[reply]

 Not done A single paragraph of material, and given a simple Google search on the subject it's highly unlikely that it meets the notability guidelines for inclusion. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:31, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nightcat

I, Captrobb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Captrobb (talk) 01:47, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global Quizzing Corporation

Its for people on facebook whom is in the group or outside the group can see whats going on. Freedom of Press Amendment 1 US Constitution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmastromonaco (talk • contribs) 01:59, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The First Amendment does not apply to private entities whatsoever, and we are not obligated to keep items that are not compliant with Wikipedia's policies. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:10, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tetsuya Kaida

work in progress -Moodsjp (talk) 02:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done The submission is essentially an unsourced promotional essay about the subject, who likely does not meet the notability guidelines to begin with. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:32, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Connie Bea Hope

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Anro5785 (talk) 04:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why can I not find a record of the article being deleted and if you are going to delete the article on Connie Bea Hope why not delete the article on Estelle Payton?

If the article on Hope is not restored I am requesting that the article on Peyton be deleted as well. Tit for tat is only fair

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The existence of Article X cannot be used to justify Article Y. Please see WP:Notability, which ALL articles need to meet. Also, the article was never deleted; it was redirected to the programme she works for]. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:16, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Then how do you restore the original article. You let Dot Moore have an article of her own and not her when they are the same basic kind of TV personality? How can I find the original text. I have proposed the deletion of a number of Mobile area figures. If you delete her it's only fair you do the same with them. Especially Estelle Peyton and Dot Moore. She certainly reached a far greater audience daily in her time than the reality TV show contestants you let have their own articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anro5785 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

THE EXISTENCE OF ARTICLE X CANNOT BE USED TO JUSTIFY THE EXISTENCE OF ARTICLE Y. I will once again point you to WP:Notability by way of explanation. If you don't like it, try to change it as opposed to complaining that someone should have an article based on the presence of articles on similar topics. (By that logic, I deserve an article because I'm a writer, and Eoin Colfer has an article.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They tried getting rid of the article 5 years ago and I successfully argued against it. They tried using notability as the reason and we did in fact establish she was notable. Go back to that discussion. I analyzed TV trends. This has been done solely because she is a Mobile, Alabama based TV figure from a long time ago even though she was one of the most important media personalities in the Southeast of her time. Which is make more ridiculous by the fact that the same kind of merger was not done to Estelle Payton

One of you could have come down to Mobile and looked at archival footage and old issues of the paper. It's an anti-Southern bias is all it is — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anro5785 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you will not listen to what I am trying to tell you then I will stop bothering to respond to you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done The article is not deleted, so there's nothing to do here. It was redirected. You can discuss the redirect with User:Drmies instead, ideally by addressing the concerns that prompted the redirect to begin with. "you must do X since you won't do Y for me" is not an argument that tends to get much traction around here. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:59, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CertiCon

I, Enkamm, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Enkamm (talk) 07:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:18, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/best tennis players in history

I, 2602:306:3435:920:B1B3:30AC:1D3F:CAD, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2602:306:3435:920:B1B3:30AC:1D3F:CAD (talk) 11:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done There's a few problems with this list, starting with the title. "Best" is very subjective. But I think it might have a future. You will definitely need to be more clear and encyclopedic about what the criteria for inclusion is based on the data on the tables. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sir John Grenfell Nutting

I have been extremely busy with parental issue (they are very elderly and disabled and have been taking up a lot of my time, but I do intend to get back to this and sort it out. "Save page" button below -Grandma-Dorrie (talk) 11:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:49, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Grandma-Dorrie: I think there is some notability there but in its current state the article will likely be deleted again, so you need to work on it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:21, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Time For Change Foundation

I, ProvenceAntiquities, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. SaintClair (talk) 13:03, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The submission was restored by User:Tokyogirl79 and then deleted again because it was too promotional. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:23, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Slapdash (film)

I, Hebert72, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hebert72 (talk) 18:14, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Hebert72: Please follow the recommendations from the AFC reviewers before re-submitting. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:24, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Green Light on the Southern

I, WJRC, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WJRC (talk) 18:31, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @WJRC: Remember that standalone articles on albums must prove notability beyond merely existing. Otherwise they should be merged as appropriate to a "discography" article for the artist. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carbles (Board Game)

I, Mattg889, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mattg889 (talk) 00:38, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattg889:  Done Mike V • Talk 02:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Books Through Bars

Books Through Bars - Philadelphia is an important organization that has been doing what they have been doing for nearly 25 years now. It was deleted through a PROD process apparently. I know I didn't notice it, and I certainly would have contested it. Furthermore the idea as referenced that it was "concern was: Minor charity listed in many directories but virtually nothing actually written about it. Non-notable." is simply absurdly sloppy and seemingly lazy. Amongst the many articles written about them are recent ones referencing them in regards to censorship and prisoner education one of which can be seen at: http://www.pennlive.com/opinion/2014/06/the_dept_of_corrections_is_wag.html In addition, one can easily find many references to them on google scholar, google books as well as news archive and search sites like http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives -Centerone (talk) 07:59, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Magic Thermodynamic Box

I do not believe this was a fair deletion as i am not trying to promote any company or business as this is just an article educating how a certain invention is changing solar energy and how it normally works. -Salihcan97 (talk) 09:06, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A.G Leventis Nigeria PLC

Please go through my talk page and history. I had one of your admins help me out Melanie.She really hleped me with the footnotes, i managed to get all the articles i needed as references and proper references, i even reworded the article, and it was also APPROVED...up to wehre someone decided it was not right, and just bascially DELETED it. Even if i wanted to EDIT that mistake! or whatever he found, i coudn't. I'm not trying to do any harm here...just trying to do my job. And its not helping me if my article gets fully deleted. -Dpapa187 (talk) 11:41, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=614494612"