Jump to content

User talk:SwisterTwister

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Margot.irvine (talk | contribs) at 03:58, 6 March 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).

PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

Talk page watchers are welcome to answer if I am unavailable at the time.

Wikipedia ad for Wikipedia:WikiProject France
Wikipedia adsfile info – show another – #108

Hi SwisterTwister,

A couple months ago you reviewed my article and had said it looked notable but needed more sources and to notify you once I have made the proper changes. I have made revisions to the article (Hubbell Water Heaters) and would appreciate if you could look over it again. Thanks for your time. Carrierc (talk) 14:49, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SwisterTwister. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— CharlieJamesTennant (talk) 22:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your thorough (and often unappreciated) efforts at AfD! Thanks so much! —МандичкаYO 😜 07:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for your tireless and thoughtful !votes at AfD, an area that desperately needs more people (like you) participating. Kharkiv07 (T) 01:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

dineshyazz

Thanks for your appreciation.I need separate privacy for my page mudichur. Thank you ( k Dinesh 04:55, 21 February 2016 (UTC) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshyazz (talk • contribs)

A barnstar for you!

The Minor barnstar
For seeming to always be there to patrol and tag Hypericum articles and many others, as well as your helpful behind-the-scenes minor edits. Cheers! Fritzmann2002 13:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for your review! Rqfa42 (talk) 03:11, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
thanks for making Wikipedia better ,great job maybe some day people will actually use this site for studying Alainamakeitreal (talk) 17:01, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Purple Star The Purple Star
If you are feeling down, it means the world owes you one of these: The Purple Star, for Wikipedians who have been wounded/flamed/harassed or generally annoyed by those who should have known better. It's an imperfect world (and project) - I hope this nice collectible will make you feel a bit better about them today. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:33, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
thx so much for your advice i really needed it did not know how to make an article at first thx again 8) United kingdoms my home (talk) 21:40, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you :) जैन (talk) 13:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Ihemadu

Hi David,

Seasons greetings to you. You nominated the above article for deletion and it was deleted. Although, I participated in the deletion discussion, supporting its deletion. After another look, I think it meet WP:BASIC and per Beacrat suggestion and the reliable sources I found, I will like to re-create the page. I'm glad to let you know. Regards. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 09:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dineshyazz

SwisterTwister 😊..Thanks for your appreciation..i need to have separate privacy in edit section for my page mudichur.Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dineshyazz (talk • contribs) 04:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Working Man's Barnstar
I've noticed that you've reviewed a lot of my articles, which is a pretty thankless task, so I reckon you deserve a barnstar! Thanks for the hard work! Alarichall (talk) 16:17, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you for the patrolling Prof. Manna (talk) 01:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yo Ho Ho

MarnetteD|Talk is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec15b}} to your friends' talk pages.

Make sure to click on both pictures to see them full size SwisterTwister as they will give you a chuckle. May your 2016 be full of joy and special times. MarnetteD|Talk 04:45, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks a lot for the hard work. Prof. Manna (talk) 09:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 10:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

Just wanted to recognize your efforts in Page Curation. I never seem to be able to get to one before you so I checked the log and it is almost all you! Happy Squirrel (talk) 20:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikiclaus greetings
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you the happiest of Wikiclaus' Wikipedian good cheer.
This message is intended to celebrate the holiday season, promote WikiCheer and hopefully to make your day just a little bit better, for Wikiclaus encourages us all to consider our options, use due diligence in evaluations, spread smiles, fellowship, and seasonal good cheer by wishing others a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Share the good feelings and the happiest of holiday spirits from Wikiclaus !

A kitten for you!

Thanks for your review of my article, cheers!

CounterTime (talk) 17:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas!!
May you and your family have a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year,

Thanks for all your help and support, and of course all your work, on Wikipedia!

   – Onel5969 TT me 03:50, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Each of the last few pages I've created has been reviewed by you, which, I think, goes to show how hard you've been working at NPP. Your efforts are much appreciated; so here's a beer to help you relax afterwards. Vanamonde93 (talk) 07:40, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Seasons Greetings

Seasons Greetings

Christmas! Christmas, everywhere,
on every talk page, I do dispair
Seasons being greeted and Wikibreaks told,
but still time for a little more editing, for being WP:BOLD!
So go on, go forth and enjoy beyond concern
Your Wiki will be waiting for when you return.

Thanks for all the hard work you do at AfC! -- samtar whisper 07:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Your work at AfC is appreciated. CatcherStorm talk 12:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Christmas Wishes

Arbol Navidad 03 Christmas wishes Always :) (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Holidays


User:Denisarona (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Happy New Year!

Denisarona (talk) 11:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing you all the best . . .

ST, may you continue to make Wikipedia a better place in the New Year. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:12, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2016

Happy New Year 2016!
Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unneccessary blisters.
   – Cullen328 Let's discuss it 08:15, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!


Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Quis separabit? 17:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, SwisterTwister!

Happy New Year!

SwisterTwister,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:50, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
thx for your help i really need it and also thx for your thoughtfulness to help me have a happy holidays and a magical new year :) :) United kingdoms my home (talk) 14:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, SwisterTwister!

SwisterTwister, I wish you and those dear to you
golden days of love and joy in a

Happy New Year 2016!

Best regards,
Sam Sailor Talk! 01:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pass on!
Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages.
Information icon Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.
(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

AfD efforts

The Working Man's Barnstar
Just wanted to reach out and thank you for all the efforts you put forth at AfD. While I may not always agree with you, your contribution to helping to keep that backlog down is an asset to the community. Keep it up, and don't let all the negativity that can come along with your efforts get you down! Onel5969 TT me 16:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for all the AfC work you do. You make this place a better place. Keep it up: the more you do, the less I have to do. Drmies (talk) 04:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Dear SwissTwister,

How are you? I hope you are well and enjoying your weekend! I added all coverage and relible source on Riabenkova. I would like to get help and her draft profile available! Please let me know!

Thank you! HBX978 (talk) 19:53, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
Well, it isn't really just a new page patroller thing: this barnstar (in this instance) is also for the simple business of regularly participating in deletion discussions (of new pages and not-so-new). Because we both know isn't so simple, and it is good to know that there are others consistently working on these things too. Mostly thanklessly. But not you, not anymore, because I offer my thanks. And a barnstar. Woo hoo! KDS4444Talk 00:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: Jeezuz, you need to archive this stuff again soon! The page is a mile and a half long!! Just a thought! --KDS4444Talk 00:42, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you

Wiae has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. †

/wiae ★ /tlk 03:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for patrolling List of people from Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Coolabahapple (talk) 07:14, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank you for the barnstar, and especially for all the tagging and clean-up! I see your name all over the place doing helpful things.--Mojo Hand (talk) 02:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for being so diligent and reviewing my articles! I hope you enjoy them. Best wishes;--Nephiliskos (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Oh boy, chocolate chip! Philbutler (talk) 17:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are a tireless contributor and an inspiration

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You are a tireless contributor and an inspiration Talk to SageGreenRider 02:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thank you for reviewing the article that I posted, and for the list of great resources. I'm looking forward to reading them! ComicsAndMovies (talk) 05:37, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks! Long live La Graham and modern dance. A fellow Texan Feralpearl (talk) 14:29, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
I seem to be seeing you everywhere. Thanks for the enormous about of work you are doing with MfD, CSD and areas I probably do not see. S Philbrick(Talk) 13:19, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thank you for a heads-up on an AfD last month. sadly, I was busy working the holiday season and then went on a two-week vacation, so I never saw that.

Bearian (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

I appreciate your reviewing the pages I made! It's not every editor who will do the background stuff, that so thanks for stepping up to help maintain the quality standards of the encyclopedia. CaseyPenk (talk) 19:56, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Star Gazers

Swister Twister, did you start the page for the 2016 season of "Star Gazers" (the astronomy show)? I was rather surprised to see it. I've been working on the episode listings for that show for a number of years now. There was once another person who worked on "Star Gazers" as well; but, he has since retired from Wikipedia (so, I had been "going it solo" ever since). I'm glad to see new interest in the TV show. Brianhass (talk) 00:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lisa Christine Holmberg

First of all, I'd like to say thank you for reviewing several of my pages that I started, Metalheads, Rising Falcon Cinema, and Gregory Cahill. Secondly, I'd like to start a page called Lisa Christine Holmberg, but it seems that I can't due to former deletions. I've found ten notable newspaper articles in my research to reference on the page, which exceeds the necessary four or five sources to prove basic notability. Not to mention that the page is already referenced on another Wikipedia page. How should I proceed? Thank you for your time. WikiConqueror (talk) 04:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiConqueror Hmm, frankly, it would depend whether it now better satisfies WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister It does. I'm just unsure how to create the page since it seems to be somewhat protected. WikiConqueror (talk) 05:48, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WikiConqueror One path is WP:Articles for creation, where third-party users including myself (I'm a reviewer) can review it before accepting it or not. SwisterTwister talk 05:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister Okay, thanks! I'll do that. WikiConqueror (talk) 05:55, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister I submitted the article Lisa Christine Holmberg. If you have any suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! WikiConqueror (talk) 07:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:BlackBerry Soul Radio

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:BlackBerry Soul Radio, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: no AfC template, so not within G13. Thank you.

This does not come within the definition of G13, which says "any userspace drafts and drafts in the Draft: namespace that are using the project's {{AFC submission}} template" (my emphasis). I don't know why that qualification was added, but unless there is consensus to remove it, abandoned drafts like this one must either go to MfD or simply be left alone. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:03, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

JohnCD - I think the difference is that these drafts are under an older AFC process. I can't think of a good reason why G13 shouldn't be expanded to include these drafts as well. Can you? I'm considering raising this at WT:CSD.--Mojo Hand (talk) 16:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
JohnCD. I use G13 on these--I read it more inclusively, exactly the same way as SwisterTwister does. I think that was the intent of the rule. I'm very reluctant to use anything like IAR at Speedy, but this is simply a technical problem in the wording. I support ST's use of G13, and I delete any such nominated article I see.
But to eliminate ambiguity, see my proposed change at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13 Drafts - [1] DGG ( talk ) 17:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see the reason for the words "that are using the project's {{AFC submission}} template" in G13, but they are there, I assume for a purpose; part of the compromises when G13 was first agreed? I have commented at WT:CSD that I'm happy to see them removed. JohnCD (talk) 19:29, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G1 speedy deletion again

Hi. You have tagged a number of user space pages with WP:G1 again, despite my having previously explained your errors in doing so. Firstly, if a page is written in readable English then it is not applicable for G1. Secondly, G1 does not apply to user space pages anyway. Please read the speedy deletion criteria properly and please stop tagging readable English user pages with G1. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:17, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft deletions

As I recently told you, every single one of your G13 nominations is being posted in incorrect format. Please learn how to do it. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 11:36, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To actually explain the issue, Template:Db-g13 states that you need to add the |ts= parameter to indicate when the page was last constructively edited. Sam Walton (talk) 17:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies: I should also have said that. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:02, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G6

I do not think I would use G6 on userspace drafts as an additional reason, U5 is sufficient (but I do add G11 sometimes to the worst of them to prevent it being restored on request) DGG ( talk ) 17:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dave! If you haven't noticed, I'll add it as a "non-controversial housekeeping" and also for the new G6 which would be applicable, "Deleting userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text if the user who created the page has been inactive for at least one year". Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 19:47, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Around the World by Horse Drawn Caravan

I've done more research online and added in more sources from multiple newspaper reports, let me know if there's enough for the article to be published. Thanks Fsmgrant (talk) 22:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thank you for the kind reviews. Prof TPMS (talk) 01:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry about speedy deletion of Lanwar

I missed the notification about this being nominated for speedy deletion. I have no idea what was on the page that made it look like advertising. Would it be possible for me to see the deleted page contents? Sparr (talk) 09:09, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:23:24, 25 January 2016 review of submission by Bodysurfinyon


Thank you for reviewing my article. Can you give me some guidance as to how much context I need to provide? I strongly believe this is a hugely important topic and it might take a while to make it something that a lay person could understand. My hobby has bee reading books about consciousness for the past 15 years. Could it be a stub? Thanks for any more guidance you can offer. Bodysurfinyon (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew_E_Checkley

Would you mind taking a look at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Andrew_E_Checkley

I responded to a query from the editor at OTRS – I don't like nominating an article for AfD in such cases, so thought you seemed to be on a user space review roll – if you are going through them in alphabetical order and want to wait until it comes up in rotation, that's fine.--S Philbrick(Talk) 13:30, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:07:15, 25 January 2016 review of submission by Wdaellenbach


More sources from credible sources have been added in order to coopt the news article regarding Chris RIvers winning two major Toronto music awards and should qualify him as a notable artist. Numerous sources have been added and information improved upon and his page should be created.

Berenstain Bears (Atari 2600 game)

SwisterTwister Thank you for taking the time to review the article Draft:Berenstain Bears (Atari 2600 game). I am disappointed, however, that you found this article to not meet the notability threshold. As a highly collectible video game, and one that has been covered in many books and magazine articles (as shown in the references), I am wondering what more you find necessary to approve this article. Many revisions have taken place to expand the article and remove any information or references from non-reputable sources or wiki pages, with all seven current references being published books or magazine/journal articles. As a start-class entry, I believe the article to be well-sourced, accurate, and definitely notable both in the world of video game collecting as well as children's literature. Any additional feedback you could provide would be appreciated. Darb02 (talk) 02:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:51:09, 26 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by MESA po


Following-up on the feedback received on a draft article


Dear Sir,

Thank you very much for reviewing my article about the MalERA Eradication Research Agenda. Your feedback has been very useful. I have updated the reference,adding citations that are independent of the subject. I would be grateful if you could have a look at it and let me know whether this is acceptable.

Thank you very much

MESA po (talk) 08:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Hi

Thank's for help me MPoss110 (talk) 09:19, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:41:21, 26 January 2016 review of submission by Beshestephens


Every Miss New Jersey since 2008 has their own individual page - can you explain why this titleholder is less notable than the rest? Beshestephens (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:51:31, 26 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Haitimovieawards


Hi,

Our article was recently declined. I believe it's by mistake, because we are not infringing any copyright materials. The information is coming straight from our website www.mpahaiti.org. The article is about our organization I'm sorry for any confusions or misunderstandings.

We would appreciate if you could accept our article/page on Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding.


Haitimovieawards (talk) 18:51, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you for your help and for the warm welcome. It is appreciated. ArtsMonaro (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04:47:22, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Lemurian.in


Hi SwisterTwister, This is my first article on Wikipedia. Sorry that I couldn't meet our norms, the sources as far referred are main newspaper and magazines here in India. How can I improve my article from here. Whether need to get more reliable citation? Please guide me in right direction to complete the article in a better way. And Interested to contribute much more.

Lemurian.in See my comment at the draft, the article simply needs any further available sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 04:59, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you SwisterTwister. I have not used some references I collected in Article. I will update and let you know. Lemurian 05:05, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister. I have improved the article, please take a look into and also collected a book link and newspaper cuttings. Also will include that soon. Lemurian.in (talk) 04:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister. I have improved article with some more sources collected. Is it good to submit now? Please guide me regarding. Lemurian.in (talk) 07:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05:19:07, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Racinggold


Hello, I am very new ti submitting a wiki article, i would like to get more clarity as to why my submission was declined as i feel the independent sources shown in the references is adequate however i feel i have not tagged then correctly with the right ref tags and this is your reason for declining the article?

All references are independent for this article.

Tom. Racinggold (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Racinggold See WP:Your first article and WP:Referencing for beginners, the article will need further available information and sources overall to be acceptable. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:22, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05:23:19, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Kasturika


Added 2 external links to confirm notability.

Kasturika Unfortunately, that's still not enough. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06:11:28, 27 January 2016 review of submission by Percocetpistolpete


I have added links, and tried to source out as many links as I can without adding spam. It seems that this person is notable, and should have a wikipedia page, but maybe my process of creating it wasn't done right the first time. This person is on CBS Radio in the greater NYC area, he is often on television, see links and sources and additions I have made. Now I had to link this person's youtube page which you can see HERE, but that is because I couldn't find the direct link or any link that would have it on TV. If such a link/source does exist, maybe you can help me find it.

What's funny is as I was working on this, kind of taking a break, I see him pop up on TMZ sports on my TV. So I linked the TMZ article that mentions his show, and I am waiting for the TV clip to be up so I can source that. I just thought that was ironic, lol.

Ok so he is regular guess on the Arise Network...but again, mostly seen on his own youtube as they are a TV station and run live....here is one article I found but the video links are dead

ARISE TV LINK

And here is again the clips but they are on his youtube, which I don't feel like it should be a problem since they are real clips, but should I try to get them another way?

Scoop B on Arise Youtube Link

Then he is a guest on the BEN Network Show talking about Isiah Thomas joining the Liberty as their coach. LINK

but again, his own youtube is the source....so is that a problem?

Then I found a link to the audio for when he was on ESPN Radio discussing the Hoop Hall of Fame and Alonzo Mourning ....Here is the AUDIO LINK and then here is a SHORT WRITE UP The first link went down, then back up, it was at www.CatfishHughes.com which is just a page about that person I assume.

Ok then I added his education which includes his attendance to the youth camp ran by famous Ian Eagle and Bruce Beck. He didn't just attend, but they also had a write up about him being a famous alumni which I linked and you can see I added the link to the page LINK HERE

Then he was already on the Hofstra Page but it was red meaning no wiki page, as a graduate, it is also on the last link it lists his masters degree.

Now is there anything else that I should add or that is needed for this to move forward? I understand that not every sports journalist should have a wikipedia page, but this person is constantly on TV weekly and on air with a radio show that gets stories from it picked up onto other shows for example see the Samakia Walker story....

Please advise and hopefully we can get this moving forward....then once I get all the links for the Evansville Hoosier wiki page I am working on that will be another story LOL!

thanks

edit: added a link to the Evansville Hoosier page I am working on because that is starting to get hard lol!

(Percocetpistolpete (talk) 06:11, 27 January 2016 (UTC))[reply]

John Saul

Thanks for plowing through my draft. I just need a little more guidance. I supplied five authoritative and reputable references detailing him and eleven in the bibliography: ten of which mention him. (There is also a book on him coming out in March, but one never rely on publisher's promises!) As a rough guideline, how many more citations referring to him would be needed to assure notability? A Google Scholar search under his name brings up plenty, so that's no problem. However, I thought the number I'd supplied was adequate for a starter stub, so now I'm puzzled. Engleham (talk) 08:01, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuts User:SwisterTwister

Somehow, I get the feeling that this article should be notable just from the reasons you keep denying that the Blazers are not notable. Just how many multimillion dollar judgements have to be awarded by the courts for discrimination before you get it? (They did get the first, that alone should get by the issue of notability.) Would you care to see the list of discrimination judgements from 1973 to now? Robco311 (talk) 17:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability and references

A firehouse renamed is notable. See: The City of Baltimore issued a proclamation on June 5, 2003, that at 11:00 a.m., Mayor Martin O'Malley, Chief William J. Goodwin, Jr. and the Board of Fire Commissioners will rename the quarters of Engine #33, Truck #5, located at 801 E. 25th Street, in honor of former Chief of Fire Department Herman Williams, Jr.

The Chief, one of the Vulcan Blazers founders, was cited by the Baltimoresun. a daily newspaper, here: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2001-01-04/news/0101040188_1_fire-department-city-fire-fire-deaths

and cited on the gov website here: https://archive.baltimorecity.gov/Government/AgenciesDepartments/Fire/NewsPressReleases/tabid/231/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/4535/Chief-Clack-Promotes-Fire-Departments-First-African-American-Female-Battalion-Chief.aspx News CBS affiliate cbslocal: http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2013/05/22/baltimore-city-fire-department-promotes-first-african-american-female-battalion-chief/ also cited here: http://rnia1.org/battalion-chief-charline-b-stokes/

The LODD of trainee Wilson, a black woman who was not a VB, resulted in the resignation of BFCD head Goodwin, whose ouster was publicly called for by the Vulcan Blazers over systemic failures that failed to protect her, here: http://www.firefighterclosecalls.com/news/fullstory/newsid/48276/layout/no -on pg 5/7 and by the IAFF fire union here: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2007-11-14/news/0711140332_1_goodwin-dixon-resignation Henry Burris, the head of the Vulcan Blazers, requested federal intervention in 2011 and called the dept 'racist', here: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2011-11-15/news/bs-md-ci-chief-clack-20111115_1_chief-clack-fire-department-vulcan-blazers

NIOSH investigation into the death of f.f.trainee wilson is found here: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/fire/reports/face200709.html The incident is covered here: http://cfbt-us.com/wordpress/?p=217 and here; http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bal-wilson0210-story.html f.f. injuries at that fire cited here: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bal-wilsonside0210-story.html f.f. Wilsons promotion cited here: http://boards.ancestry.com/topics.obits/83328/mb.ashx The completed investigation is here: http://api.ning.com/files/m3L7vihSP*vBdQeJzt5KLHWG8knVGxBHk2rDxuBx*dL2PYo0WEOhmzvJfLH*bEKdBKdBh3ntTk1mP-ms9v-jChIj3FqoRqsQ/BaltimoreTrainingLODDFinalReport82307.pdf

Then see also all about Lt. Bethea, who was a Vulcan Blazer for all of his 41 years as a f.f. with BCFD, in fact, as 5th in his academy class, he was one of the blacks to be ordered hired as a result of Judge Young finding for the aggrieved class of firefighters in that class action lawsuit, here: http://www.leagle.com/decision/19731546359FSupp1187_11346/HARPER%20v.%20MAYOR%20AND%20CITY%20COUNCIL%20OF%20BALTIMORE

For more of the Lawsuit that began the whole affirmative action consent decree thingy, see here: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2013-04-22/news/bs-md-ci-fire-recruitment-cut-20130422_1_all-white-class-vulcan-blazers-recruitment

At this point it's fairly redundant, The VB have been at the heart of Baltimores diversity efforts from their founding in 1970 to the present day. All of the news stories about the group were negative calls the news media trumpeted as the only thing they seemed capable of, namely calling out the racist policies of the BFCD. So positive stories of the Vulcan Blazers did not make the news. But cites are found aplenty of individual VB's whom are feted for their contributions, or their loss. Other than the 3 editors whom have declined the article as notable, is there any one whom sees this article as notable, possessing context, is timelined and can be streamlined by further editing? Robco311 (talk) 17:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me in a timely fashion Robco311 (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Editing

Hi,

I was wondering if you might be able to help me with an article that has a... (This article or section may have been copied and pasted from http://ceocfointerviews.com/interviews/nfrastructure13.htm (DupDet · CopyVios), possibly in violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please remedy this by editing this article to remove any non-free copyrighted content and attributing free content correctly, or flagging the content for deletion. Please be sure that the supposed source of the copyright violation is not itself a Wikipedia mirror.) tag on it. I have since made some edits to correct but the tag is still there. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

Jeffreykenneth79 (talk) 14:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:40:59, 28 January 2016 review of submission by Biancabartolo1992


Hi! Thanks for taking the time to read this request for a review.

I'm a little confused as to why the article was rejected. The reason cited was in regards to the sources and them not being reliable, however there are more than 10 sources listed that are from external and independent sources. None of them are paid for, all of the written articles are written by factual and well respected media sources.

Could you give me some ideas about what would need to change in order for this submission to be accepted?

Thanks!

16:54:47, 28 January 2016 review of submission by DJLondenBuckner

I am requesting a re-review because I made this article-wikipedia on behalf of my client, Londen Buckner (DJ L) . I feel like the reasoning for declining his submission is inaccurate. If you look below for the article I have listed several sources from one of the most popular blogs in Chicago, FakeShoreDrive, which does have an actual editor. Not to mention it is noted on youtube and known throughout Chicago and the music industry culture that DJ L produced for artists lil herb, lil bibby, tink, plies. All people who have wikipedia pages. He is even in the studio and working right now with the producer, C-sick, who also has a wikipedia page. If he is collaborating with these individuals and made the sound for these individuals to achieve this level of fame/notoriety. I don't see why he can't have his own wikipedia page that he is rightly due for his work and contribution to hip-hop culture. All the credits I listed on his page can be found on the credits on the record. He was just credited on Lil Durk's last album as a producer with C sick. Lil Durk also has a wikipedia page. With all due respect I just feel like the person reviewing this article didn't have an indepth knowledge of hip-hop culture/chicago hip hop culture. DJ L was even listed as one of the top 25 producers in hip hop in 2015- http://watchloud.com/best-rap-producers-in-2015/ so I don't understand what the issue is. I look forward to hearing back from you. Thank you.

Mark Furman

[Mark Furman] Edit Hello,

I am requesting a review of the edit for the Mark Furman page, While "Mark Fuhrman" is notable I feel that "Mark Furman" also has enough sources online to verify his own notability as an author. I request that your changes be reconsidered. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrhatman (talk • contribs) 03:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mrhatman, I would suggest seeing WP:Your first article so you know how articles work. If you have further questions, please ask here. SwisterTwister talk 03:12, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CSD nominations

Please consider checking main namespace for articles about topics and subjects that you are nominating for deletion in user namespace. For example, you nominated User:Ellemac99/Enter your new article name here for deletion per WP:U5 with the edit summary "Unlikely notable" (diff), but the draft's content is about Max Irons, who is notable per Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I have declined your speedy nomination and redirected the userspace draft to the Max Irons article. Please consider performing source searches for subjects and topics to determine notability, rather than assuming non-notability. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 09:35, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:30:49, 29 January 2016 review of submission by GreyFoxBluegrass


Hello: The Grey Fox Bluegrass Festival has been identified in news articles in several publications, including the New York Times, as a festival akin to some of the biggest and most well known bluegrass festivals, including Telluride Bluegrass Festival, which has a Wikipedia Page. In other words, both Telluride and Grey Fox have proven to be noteworthy or notable. I have amended the draft to add two more newspaper citations for a total of 6 footnoted citations. Please reconsider your rejection. Further, I have had trouble upload photos to the site which were provided to me by the Grey Fox Blue Grass Festival staff from photographers that gave the organization full use permission. I am not sure why they are not uploading. Thank you for reviewing this page and for your reconsideration.

GreyFoxBluegrass The draft still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 22:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Money pump reverts?

I could not figure out why you reverted my edits on the Money Pump argument, which provided history, explanation, differentiated it from the Dutch Book, and cited sources for this information. Asaduzaman (talk) 04:18, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]




I have gone through the Referencing for beginners. All the references given are from independent sources i.e., newpapers, TV channels, websites etc. about Indian Tigers Group. Kindly elaborate as what other references are required to support the article.

Commented at draft. SwisterTwister talk 07:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07:22:11, 30 January 2016 review of submission by Indiantigers



Dear SwisterTwister,

I have read your comment and as advised i have gone through the Referencing for beginners and submission guidelines. All the references given in the article are from third party independent sources i.e., Notable Newpapers, TV channels, Websites etc about Indian Tigers. I am looking to further improve the article so need your help so kindly elaborate and advise as what other references you believe are further required to support the article so that same can be added.

Thanks in advance.

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for helping me editing wikipedia! Warren Leywon (talk) 14:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:37:04, 30 January 2016 review of submission by Mirialova


Hello, I would appreciate more specifics regarding your question of the subject's notability and my use of references. I have cited several articles from The Washington Post, including an editorial on the occasion of Scheiber's retirement. To my knowledge, for the Washington Post to run an editorial about the end of someone's career is very rare, and speaks to the subject's notability. The interview of Walter Scheiber by Don Nicoll was taped for the Edmund Muskie Archives at Bates College, and resides in those Archives. If your concern is with my citations of material from the MWCOG and NARC websites, I would be happy to remove them and I believe there would still be sufficient material to establish notability. I have added a few sources in the City Management section, and have another source from the Washingtonian Magazine. Before I resubmit this, I would very much appreciate more detailed feedback to guide my revision.

Question on Citation.

LInda878988 (talk) 23:41, 30 January 2016 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivienne_Hu[reply]

Dear Swister Twister,

A little confusion on the "page curation " tag you put on "Vivienne Hu". I edited this page before, can you please specify the which sentence should be changed, Please let me know. Thank you !

Wiki Loves Nigeria Writing Contest

Hello SwisterTwister, and happy Wikipedia @ 15. This is to notify you of Wiki Loves Nigeria Writing Contest organized by the Wikimedia User Group Nigeria to commiserate the 15th anniversary of Wikipedia. The contest will start on 28 January 2016 and end on 29 February 2016. Please help to suggest articles on notable Nigeria-related topic here and if you like to be part of the jury, add your name here. Thanks for your participation. Warm regards Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 02:16, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

U5 does not apply to stale drafts

Hi SwisterTwister,

criterion U5 does not apply to stale drafts. Most of what you have been labelling as such are attempted drafts, not a dubions web hosting. The only one I delete with U5 was a political candidate statement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett Yes, unfortunately, I noticed that but the fact is several other users (at least close to 20) have in fact deleted these type of articles as U5 because, for example, User:Er.abinkurian/Abin kurian is an obvious autobiography and has no actual meaningful draft materials. Furthermore, the fact that these accounts are SPA with no further activity and improvements may it applicable for U5 (see WP:U5). I hope you will reconsider as you can basically ask any other user such as, RHaworth, DGG, Boing! said Zebedee, Jimfbleak, Liz, Northamerica1000 and several others. SwisterTwister talk 18:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If it is a stale draft of something already in WP, I usually delete it as G6, specifying unneeded duplicate. If they were coded U5, I delete them nonetheless. but I change the reason. DGG ( talk ) 18:48, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep up the good work. Here's a suggestion: instead of U5 slap the following at the top of offending pages: {{subst:AFC submission/draftnew}} {{db-g13}} .
But one request - check CAT:CSD from time to time and when its main section exceeds about 200 artices, suspend your operations to give us poor admins time to catch up. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:15, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Most of the stale drafts I've deleted are clear G13s and have been marked as such. I'm not aware of deleting a stale draft with a U5 criteria but it might have happened. Sometimes, when the page is a biography of an editor, it's clear U5 material but the author might have intended the page to be a draft for a future article. Liz Read! Talk! 21:08, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:51:40, 31 January 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Racinggold


Hi

i have decided to not use this account as it does bias the reporting. i will establish my own independent account and start afresh. this account is not my account merely one i am using on the owners behalf.

there is a lot more to this than initially thought and i see why you have to scrutinise self promotion articles versus informative ones. this is duly noted.

i hope my next submission is more favourable.

tom

Racinggold (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Racinggold (talk) 10:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

07:04:35, 1 February 2016 review of submission by DutoiuSorin



Dear SwisterTwister, Would you be so kind as to re-review the edited article about Amadeus Electric Quartet I resubmitted 15 days ago. I have included more references such as newspapers, magazines and online news websites that wrote about the band. Amadeus Electric Quartet is one of the most famous Romanian bands internationally, therefore the international public needs a proper English Wikipedia page, one I have been trying to publish for the past month. Thank you for your help! Regards!

Hmm, there are several sources listed but I will let someone else, perhaps familiar with that subject area, review it instead. SwisterTwister talk 07:08, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:57:58, 1 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Sstan19


Help with my page; references. Hi. So can you help me understand why my page wasn't allowed? I have seen many other pages for race tracks of similar or less notoriety with far less info and background about the track. I'm new to Wikipedia contributing, so I admit there are violations of the "independent of the subject" rule. If I can find some other sources from other newspapers or what have you, will my page be good to go or are there other hoops to jump through?

Thank you for your time, Sean Sstan19 (talk) 07:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC) Sstan19 (talk) 07:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned, I believe it simply still needs any further available sources overall, see the draft for my comment. SwisterTwister talk 07:59, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Review of WideOrbit page

Ahoy, SwisterTwister!

What's the good news about your discussion with DGG?

Many thanks, Entroporium Entroporium (talk) 00:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

06:32:10, 2 February 2016 review of submission by 112.210.43.241


I wonder what verifiable sources does it still needs to make it as a official entry into the Wikipedia index. The sources I have came from the official websites of Dinagyang Foundation itself as well as official wordpress site of local radio station in Iloilo where the Dinagyang is being held.

I commented there. I do not think it possible to make an article on individual years of this festival. DGG ( talk ) 21:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Luzki (Lucki), Simḥah Isaac ben Moses & Ilya Ilyich Kazas

Thank you for reviewing my first article David! :) YuHuw (talk) 06:38, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for reviewing my Ilya Ilyich Kazas translation too :) I was a bit disappointed that there were no in-line footnotes in the original Russian page but hope someone will drop by who is familiar with it. Do you know how to link to the original Russian wiki article [2] in the Languages section? YuHuw (talk) 17:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@YuHuw: you link like this [[:ru:Казас, Илья Ильич]], which produces ru:Казас, Илья Ильич.-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:03:40, 2 February 2016 review of submission by Jake at REELCANADA


Hi SwisterTwister! Thanks for your consideration on the article. I'm hoping I have put in enough citations, but please let me know if you think there need to be more. There are plenty of links related to Reel Canada, but some of them are small newspapers and they generally say the same thing that other links have done. Reel Canada is a non-profit charity on the ground in every single Canadian province, so the team is tiny but dedicated.

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at 333-blue's talk page.
Message added 07:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

333-blue 07:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Mads Munk: Can you help me?

Hi SwisterTwister! Thanks you for reviewing the article on Mads Munk. I can see that you declined the submission of the article based on your opinion that the article does not adequately show the subject's notability. Can you help me with a little more guidance here, since I am not quite sure why the article doesn't meet the required criteria? The article has recently been updated with references to coverage on IMDb.com, Financial Times, Wallpaper Magazine, and Scandinavian Traveller as well as a all major Danish Business papers - Business, Borsen, Morgenavisen Jyllands-Posten, Aarhus Stiftstidende (which I understand can be hard to verify for a non-Danish speaking person, but I see that Wikipedia aknowledges non-English sources as reliable too). I have seen a number of articles on film producers with much less documentation than this, e.g. Georges Dancigers, Lars Jönsson, M. Saravanan, Erik Crone and many more. Thank you very much if you can give me a bit of advice on this! Tpm1973 (talk) 08:39, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hi SwisterTwister

How is one firm less notable than another, especially when Wikipedia has a whole Category for these kinds of companies (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Private_equity_firms_of_the_United_Kingdom), all of which have less sources than the post I am writing, and none which are noted as needing more sources. (And all of which are 100% written by employees, even though they have not noted themselves as so!)

Aung2015 (talk) 15:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:49:17, 3 February 2016 review of submission by Axb697


I strongly believe that the sources I have provided prove notability. As LaMona suggested, they were unable to access jstor website, because of their password and the like. This is not a sufficient reason to decline. You can see notability through the Arab Writers Union website and also through jstor, which is the official publication of the French Institute of Arabic Studies. Add to this the dedication of different authors in the 20th century, all are named and referred to, and also the reputed Le Monde journal. Take this for example: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41608456?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents Which is by itself a proof of notability. Hope to take it into consideration. P.S I am a doctoral researcher in the University of Birmingham.

Stefano Secco

Hi, dearest SwisterTwister, thanks you've reviewed this page!

Rei Momo (talk) 19:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:55:50, 3 February 2016 review of submission by Clive729


Hello SwisterTwister - No, I'm not requesting a re-review of my pieces on the various artists Ruth Cobb, Ruth Cobb and Frank Adams but due to Wikipedia inexperience could not figure out how to reply via your talk page.

Thanks for looking at my submissions. I accept your decision and am trying to post my disambiguation on my own website in the hope that search engines will pick it up and save other researchers the confusion I had. Sorry to have troubled you. Clive729 (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Clive729 (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:14:26, 3 February 2016 review of submission by DeanHamer


Why are you rejecting a major PBS docuemntary on a completely unique subject, who herself is already in Wikipedia? The film was nationally broadcast on the most important docuemntary strand in the USA. Its been nominated for a GLAAD media award, aka "the Gay Oscars", and its the only one of that list that isn't in Wiki. Do you have a problem with trans people?

DeanHamer The article simply needs any further available sources overall as mentioned at the draft. SwisterTwister talk 20:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Twinkle

Hi SwisterTwister,

Noting Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abeiku Okai/Senya Beraku Akumase Festival, where it was noted that you failed to notify the page creator of the nomination to delete, have you considered enabling and using Wikipedia:Twinkle? It makes the fairly complex steps of XfD nominations very easy. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

SmokeyJoe I suppose but frankly the account only edited a few times making me think they were an SPA. At best, they may remember their article immediately and thus see the MfD listing. Should they come soon, they can simply ask the article be moved to Draftspace. FWIW, I like the Twinkle concept but it seems it individually logs the daily nominations and I prefer to log them all at once. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Georgia DCS

I need some help with a wikipedia page I created Georgia Department of Community Supervision. I am trying to add the Georgia DCS seal to the infobox, but it's not centering (I am modeling it after the Georgia Bureau of Investigation page) and I've been warned twice about the copyright status of the seal. I don't want to lose edit rights, but I need to get the seal up there. Any advice on how to do it? Phinson2 (talk) 14:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No Answer

I have not received any response to the question of why my explanation of Money Pump was reverted by you.

Note that Money Pump is NOT the same as a Dutch Book, so this REDIRECT is misleading. Furthermore the Dutch Book does not mention Money Pump, although I did put it in in the edits which I made there [which are still current] Asaduzaman (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article had nothing to convince there's a solid article yet, see WP:Your first article for a how-to for starting articles. Please ask if you have questions and comments, SwisterTwister talk 05:09, 7 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asaduzaman (talk • contribs)

Dear Sister Twister -- I have many publications on this subject in advanced academic journals. Please see list of my contributions to highly technical topics. Ask someone who knows the difference between Money Pump and Dutch Book to evaluate whether or not it is a solid article. Note that the current main paragraph of explanation of Dutch Book is also my contribution, as well as many other technical sections in many other wikipedia articles. See my Google Scholar Profile, where my articles on technical topics have more than 700 citations: https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=U9Cl-pgAAAAJ&hl=en&oi=ao Asaduzaman (talk) 06:33, 7 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asaduzaman (talk • contribs)

Patrick The Miniature Horse Article approval

Hi there SwisterTwister! Thank you for reviewing my article on "GTR Patricks Vindicator" a notable miniature horse. You requested that I add more resources, which I have done. I have provided citations (with links) to magazine and newspaper articles and outside websites. I hope this is enough legitimate proof of notability to have it approved. If there is anything else I can do to improve it, please let me know! Thank you! PatrickTheMiniatureHorse (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

PatrickTheMiniatureHorse (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:57:17, 4 February 2016 review of submission by Gjuette


I believe that the subject of my draft Márta Gulyás is notable and fit for an encyclopedia. I wonder what more I can do to avoid an other decline.


The person has received several prizes and awards as pianist, is professor on two major music academies and on numerous prestigious international master classes, worshipped and adored by numerous present and past students, and juror on international competitions. I have included four references behind text portions and a list of about a dozen external links. Both seem to prove unquestionable notability. I can try do do more, but this may take time. I shall be grateful for any practical advice or help on this matter. Thanks, Gerhard Juette Gjuette (talk) 17:57, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kosmos. Problemy Nauk Biologicznych

Thank you. I have added sources to the article about Kosmos. Problemy Nauk Biologicznych. Greetings K8mf35 (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the news

See [3] DGG ( talk ) 19:29, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, now that's way cool. Nicely done gents... Onel5969 TT me 21:10, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merla

Hello SwisterTwister; I was wondering about your review of this page... I stumbled on it earlier today and noticed it had been created out of a re-direct relating to the surname Merla by a very new editor (account only minutes old) who initially blanked the page. Another editor then restored the re-direct, but the new editor then re-created the page for a company named Merla. It seems to me that there may be a COI (just a suspicion) and the page appears promotional and is unreferenced as far as I can tell. I wonder if the page should be allowed to stand as it is. I did at one point consider just restoring the re-direct. On another note thanks for always reviewing my submissions so quickly! :) Regards, Eagleash (talk) 21:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: never mind...the re-direct has been restored and the editor concerned left help on his talk-page. Eagleash (talk) 14:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the mention in techinsider

http://www.techinsider.io/wikipedia-longest-running-hoax-2015-10 --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 01:32, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prrrrr

Thanks for the kitty. I appreciate it, and so do my four parakeets. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 03:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for helping me with my first wikipedia page!

Xutech (talk) 14:13, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:46:48, 5 February 2016 review of submission by Vanaheimr


Hi! I'm not exactly trying to request a re-review yet, but this is the page I was brought to so I could ask you some questions/for some help with my article. So, first I'll try to replace the links to their website with some more 3rd party sources, I do see where you're coming from there. I was wondering though, are there any sections that you think are entirely insignificant or unsuitable and I should just remove them? I think the page is an interesting read, but if you feel that some of the info should just be deleted that's fine with me.

Thanks!

Vanaheimr (talk) 16:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Vanaheimr[reply]

Kirby Allan (Pittman)

I've been struggling with an article about Kirby Allen. He worked with Chaino in the late 1950's and their work has been re-released many times since then.

The primary issue with the article seems to be in regard to the specific citations, or their placement within the article. I'm fairly sure that Allen meets the following criteria of notability:

If disagreement remains about this article, I'd like to suggest the possibility that a link be provided for Allan, to Chaino's article, or that portions of this article be {merge}d with Chaino's.


(To keep your page tidy, I'm placing a ref section below. Please edit or delete as needed.)

References

  1. ^ "Mondo Exotica: Sounds, Visions, Obsessions of the Cocktail Generation". Francesco Adinolfi -Duke University Press, (April 4, 2008) p.105.
  2. ^ "Kirby Allan Presents Chaino: New Sounds in Rock N' Roll". Media Network, LLC - AllMusic.com.
  3. ^ "Forces of Nature (1999) - Soundtracks". IMdB.com.
  4. ^ "Forces of Nature (1999)". Turner Entertainment Networks, Inc - TCM.com.

Curley Wolf (talk) 23:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Curley Wolf The article still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 23:16, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm just not finding anything more about him, SwisterTwister. Do you think it would be possible to just link his name to Chaino's article? Curley Wolf (talk) 23:31, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, if there's not enough for a solidly independently notable article. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 23:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with review?

Hey, just saw that you reverted one of my patrol on Rhodes Lynx football. May I know the reason? Thank you, Mr RD 19:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mr RD Nothing of course, simply another case of us reviewing the exact article. SwisterTwister talk 19:14, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you use archives? My hands got tired scrolling down on your talk page.... :D Mr RD 19:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Good Humor
For your good humor and tireless contribution on page patrolling. Mr RD 19:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I see that you reviewed my draft submission on Crelow and objected to its lack of notability and insufficiently "solid" third-party references. To address the notability issue, I have rewritten the lead section, which now says that Crelow is the first online marketplace for commercial real estate. It is the first, but perhaps out of excessive modesty, I did not assert that in the original draft. As far as references go, I should have thought the leading newspapers in Minneapolis, Denver, and Houston would be sufficient, along with the primary business journals for those cities and Seattle. But there will shortly be articles about Crelow in the San Jose Mercury News and the Los Angeles Times as well. Would that be sufficient? If so, I will resubmit the article when those additional news stories appear. Thanks, Burgo Fitzgerald Burgo Fitzgerald (talk) 20:59, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

help understand National Trust paintings

There is a set of Paintings by Jane Hawkins - one of Mary Catherine Stanley, Lady Derby and I would be delighted if it was possible to upload them to commons and use them in the articles - but I don't understand the rules about if they are possible to use or not. I noticed you mention you have added images and thought you might be the person to ask about it? The paintings are referenced on the page about Jane Hawkins if that helps? 🍺 Antiqueight chat 22:08, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Antiqueight I would suggest visiting WP:UPLOAD which will explain. I have loaded images myself but looking at that page may explain better. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi SwisterTwister,

How are you today? I trust you're fine. Will you like to participate in Wiki Loves Nigeria Writing Contest, an on-going contest I organized to improve the coverage of Nigeria-related articles on Wikipedia. Your contributions will be appreciated by the community. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:51, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08:56:44, 8 February 2016 review of submission by Benm182

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Hey,

I am trying to create a few pages on Litigation funders. I am currently writing my PHD around the industry, which is really quite pivotal, but very few companies are listed on Wikipedia.

The only company which I have seen on Wikipedia so far is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harbour_Litigation_Funding and I cant tell what makes that page more worthy of note than the one I wrote. I wondered if you could please offer me some guidance?

Thanks

Ben

Benm182, WP is an encyclopedia, summarizing information published elsewhere. Therefore, we need references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. They have to be about the firm itself. Unlike a Ph.D thesis, Wikipedia does not do analysis or write articles based on primary sources such as H of Commons hearings. Nor does an analysis of case where the firm presented an analysis of the evidence show a major role of the firm, unless there are specific third party statements that specially saw how their information was critical or decisive. Please see our explanation about original research, WP:OR, and our page about WP:Reliable sources. It is in fact possible that this will be difficult to do for this firm,; it often is for small specialized companies of vartious sorts.
This is very different from academic writing, which is expected to be original research. The nearest analog in the academic world to a WP article might be a section in an advanced textbook, which is expected to just present the accepted view, based on documentation from published studies.
By the way, once your thesis has been accepted and is publicly available, then it can be used as a source. DGG ( talk ) 19:56, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing articles

Hi SwisterTwister. May I ask what you do when reviewing articles (normal articles, not AfCs)? Your page curation log sometimes lists up to 5 reviewed articles per minute, but I can hardly believe that you can check entire articles in 12 seconds, let alone tag them for problems. The BLP about Julito Buhisan Cortes for example was merely an infobox and should have been PRODded for a lack of references (I have done so by the way), but despite the issues, you plainly marked it as reviewed. - HyperGaruda (talk) 11:42, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But it's trivial to add it,I just did in less than one-minute. T We've never deleted an article on a RC bishop. hey all have findable sources. DGG ( talk ) 19:39, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DGG: That particular BLP was not my point. I am merely wondering how one can properly check a new article for problems in the nigh impossibly short span of <12 seconds. Yes I am aware of page curation tools, but it should take some time for a human mind to finish e.g. a checklist of potential issues. That is all, of course, dependent on SwisterTwister's definition of "reviewing", but I was under the impression that reviewing meant checking an article for errors and addressing them by either fixing or tagging. - HyperGaruda (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Honestly, I waited because I believed the author would continue working because the article was imaginably not finished. It's worth noting I actually watchlist any articles I find to need close examination and work. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 21:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
My own top rate is about 2 per minute , but sometimes a little faster when there are obvious problems, or an obvious lack of problems. And of course often slower, sometimes much slower like 2 a day, when it takes some thinking. DGG ( talk ) 02:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:44:03, 8 February 2016 review of submission by Ninskip


Hi SwisterTwister, you can see I've been working on this article for a while - its an info article on TransRe (inline with many reinsurance companies like Swiss Re, Munich Re, etc). We had a recent exchange with your articles creation team and therefore I toned down the language and removed some references. I can imagine you guys are really busy, proving a invaluable reference for the world, but I was wondering if there were any further pointers or guidenance you could provide, or even if you could assist I'd be really grateful.

many thanks,

Neil.

Ninskip (talk) 13:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ninskip, you might start by integrating the 3rd party external links into the references, and writing in paragraphs, not tables. Then you might want to remove those references which are essentially press releases. unless they are needed to document specific uncontroversial facts. And some financial information would help show the importance. DGG ( talk ) 19:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

White_pixelization

Hi there, I've just been linked to the AFD for this article, I didn't realise there had been a second one after the first AFD was decided to keep. Anyway, I've provided a credible source and request to keep the article perhaps with a better outside of Sweden rewrite of the article (Which I'm willing to do) as this is done also in Germany. In Germany it is done to keep anonymity of suspects prior to conviction as per German Law. There isn't really a race aspect to it, more just to make every pixelated person look the same regardless. The fact is even prior to the refugee crisis, images were pixelated in this was for exactly the same reason, not to protect refugee crimes as the original article claimed. Thanks in advance. Projectmayhem666 (talk) 14:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've compiled a list of sources mainly from Germany so I'll be able to rewrite and fully source the article this weekend. I will give until Friday for you to reconsider the deletion on the basis I will rewrite and fully reference the article with official sources, mainly the 12.1 Press Code section 5 which deals with keeping the identities of perpetrators completely anonymous from any profiling, including racial profiling. After Friday I'll be putting in an undeletion request to userfy the page so I can completely rewrite it. Projectmayhem666 (talk) 20:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help!

Thanks for for your help and guidance. You have been great!

Sleaver2 (talk) 16:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:57:05, 8 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Writingasaghost



Writingasaghost (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

<-- 1. This company has a significant presence in the EU, Middle East and Asian markets through wholesale coffee sales and through company owned and franchised coffee houses. 2. The company's heads have made important contributions to the study of coffee roasting, including publishing articles in scientific journals. 3. The company's coffee has been recommended to consumers through off-line consumer magazines. Because other recommendations of the coffee are through blogs (which do not qualify as acceptable sources), they have not been included in the article. 4. Its partnerships with foreign businesses have been reported on in both English and non-English industry journals/newspapers (online or off-line). 5. With Google translate, it is possible--if you possess a copy of the offline magazines--to understand the nature of each article. The articles cited are not mere mention. I could upload the PDFs to Wikipedia, however, I can't do so until the article leaves draft. The PDFs are of published articles, so I can only upload them using fair-use copyright rules.

While I have included references which are 'mere mentions' and don't weigh in, I understand that consumer magazines do qualify under the rules. While "The National Enquirer" would not, I believe a European equivalent to "Good Housekeeping" should.

I included the 'mere mentions' primarily to back up the coverage of their expansion.

I recognize this article requires ongoing improvements, however, I believe this draft qualifies for entry at the lowest level permissible.-->

Writingasaghost (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

schools

Is it really your intent to challenge the compromise on schools? I'd think that we have quite sufficient articles that really need deletion to waste time on debating what would quite literally be tens of thousands of these. Before the compromise, we sometimes had 10 or 15 of these every day,about a 20% increase in the number of afds to consider. The results weren't even deleting the worst of them--the results were essentially random in terms of importance or quality, depending on who showed up and how strongly the article was attacked & defended. DGG ( talk ) 19:32, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I thought boarding schools were not applicable for notability from the schools notability. SwisterTwister talk 20:13, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:15:43, 8 February 2016 review of submission by CommsPro123


Hello:

I submitted the page "Xavient Information Systems" a few weeks ago and it was denied on the grounds of a lack of notability. However, I understand notability is dependent upon having significant coverage in several reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Based on these criteria, Xavient's page should be reconsidered regarding notability, as

  • a) we provided 10 references, showing sufficient "significant" coverage and
  • b) the coverage is from reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

Xavient's coverage in CableFax, Investor's Business Daily and Broadband Technology Report especially should provide substantive evidence of notability, especially compared to the following companies' pages:

CableFax and Broadband Technology Report have been used as sources on multiple other company pages (CableFax: INSP (TV network), Full Channel, Blackboard Wars; Broadband Technology Report: Integrated Broadband Services, Pixelmetrix, Comcast Business) which supports the claim that Xavient's presence in these outlets constitutes a higher degree of notability than has been recognized.

Please reconsider Xavient's notability.

CommsPro123 (talk) 21:15, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CommsPro123 Hello and thanks! However, the current article is still not satisfying notability guidelines. It will also need any further available solid in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 21:21, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister. I'm still working on the Xavient draft page but I need more help and was hoping you could direct me to a Wikipedia user who specializes in editing IT/technology pages and who would be able to provide a steadier stream of input as I continue to work on Xavient's page. I tried to use the Teahouse with little success and despite having a "Request for Adoption" sticker on my user page for several months, no one has adopted me. Could you put me in touch with an IT/Tech editor or someone who might adopt me? Thanks. CommsPro123 (talk)

Help

I need you to submit this article with a salted title to the AfC process, R. J. Helton.The Cross Bearer (talk) 05:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Cross Bearer Hmm, the article would seem acceptable but I still question whether he's solidly independently notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How do I submit the draft to AfC?The Cross Bearer (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Cross Bearer Adding {{AFC submission}} but I still believe the article is questionable. SwisterTwister talk 07:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your opinion is one I respect, while I believe he meets notability in multiple ways (e.g.: charts, reviews, stories, another encyclopedia), and thank you for the direction regarding the submission process, love you editor have a great editing day.The Cross Bearer (talk) 07:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:15:49, 9 February 2016 review of submission by Force2006


Hi, I am new to the editing process and am viewing this entry ("Andreá Cassar). It appears there are many third party sources validating the material contained within the entry. Why was this entry rejected? And, if because of sources, why aren't the sources listed valid? --- If that is the case, what are better sources I should look out for when editing/viewing entries on Wikipedia? Thank you. - Andrew

Question

Are you a wikipedia bot?

THE PALE EMPEROR XV I am not. SwisterTwister talk 22:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Article appears to have been taken down

Hi,

I previously submitted an article for publication, Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold, and it was created in December (you sent me a message notifying me on Dec. 16). The article seems to have been taken down, as that link now redirects to Drug-eluting stent. I didn't receive a notice that it was being taken down or redirected. Is there something that can be done to bring the page back? Thank you for your help. Tom at Manifest (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

Hi, i'd made the page named [Dreams (2016 film)]. So please help me by adding some useful words and poster in it.

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for reviewing pages about many of the small communities and ghost towns of Florida and helping me preserve history. Cassini127 (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, A couple of days ago you left comments on my article informing me that I should improve my citations. I've just done that recently and I invite you to check it once more. Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markpedia1 (talk • contribs) 12:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, A couple of days ago you left comments on my article informing me that I should improve my citations. I've just done that recently and I invite you to check it once more. Thank you very much!≈≈≈≈ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markpedia1 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:30:30, 10 February 2016 review of submission by Jackieloebach


I would just like some clarification regarding why the references provided are insufficient. Some of the references listed include government websites and a published book. The newspapers listed are well-renowned publishers. Any direction or insight you can provide would be much appreciated. Thanks!

I'm going to respond to this, as I tend to specialize in school notability questions. We have a standard practice that any degree-granting high school or secondary school can have an article. It is not clear from the article whether this is indeed a degree-granting school, or a school that offers individual remote courses. I've examined the school's website in detail, and I finally did find the [4] and it does. The article needs to clarify this. It also needs some numbers: I see some approximate numbers on the web site for the number of people taking courses, but not for the number of people completing their full high school program atthe school. If nobody or almost nobody has done so, there may need to be a discussion. DGG ( talk ) 21:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

18:48:56, 10 February 2016 review of submission by Swelch12


Hello - I would like to better understand why my submission (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Artec_3D) was rejected. The feedback says that the references do not adequately show the subject's notability, but I've included references from LiveScience, NBC News, Forbes, ComputerWorld and Desktop Engineering. I would really appreciate any additional information you could share on how I can improve my submission and have it be accepted.

Swelch12 Looking atthe references, they show much mor clearly the notability fo the product than the company. I'd rewrite it in that manner using the article title Shapify. DGG ( talk ) 21:14, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gmuhwezi/African Virtual University

You apparently didn't notice we have an article on the subject, which he wrote. I deleted as G6, , as a preliminary draft with an existing article. Upon seeing an apparently promotional draft, it's always good to see whether there is also an article. I haven't checked it. DGG ( talk ) 19:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stuck in review mode?

Hey there,

I noticed my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Adrienne_Kress seems to be stuck in review mode for the past few days. It's says to say something after 12 hours.

I was wondering if you were waiting for me to change something? The review notification asks me not to change anything until after the review.

Thanks!


Sleaver2 (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re Agarwal Packers and Movers - thank you

Hi SwisterTwister, Thank you for taking the time to give some feedback. I will persevere with the article then. Ravi — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alokibees (talk • contribs) 23:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abradable Powder Coatings

Alrirght, so can we get this page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abradable_Powder_Coatings) up finally. It's more than ready to be up and literally every detail has been sourced. Would be swell to have it done so i can move on to my next project/contribution :) Fauxtoez (talk) 02:45, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Fauxtoez[reply]

10:43:47, 12 February 2016 review of submission by DeanHamer


Please re-review KUMU HINA asap. It's been nominated for a major media award (GLAAD) and put forward for two Emmy Awards (by PBS). It's the only major PBS film WITHOUT a Wiki this season. Very strange given the major presence in the media word. Mahalo.

Deletion of userspace pages

Hello, David. I've been deleting userspace pages which you have tagged for speedy deletion. I see that you have been systematically working through the alphabet, and are now up to H. You must have put quite a lot of work into checking huge numbers of pages, and you are to be congratulated on dealing with a lot of junk which really should have been deleted years ago, but nobody put in the work of checking. In my opinion, some of your most useful work is tagging unambiguously promotional pages. However, I am less sure about the value of tagging a page "because it is a userspace draft containing only the default Article Wizard text, and the user who created the page has been inactive for at least one year". The huge number of pages you have tagged take up a considerable amount of administrator time, which could be spent on other things, and while in my opinion the time is worth spending when it is removing such things as spam, I am less convinced that taking time away from other work in order to delete essentially empty pages is a good idea. You may therefore like to consider leaving those pages. Obviously, it's up to you, but that's a suggestion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:46, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:35:11, 12 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Kantonus


Submission declined for Netop Remote Control

Hi SwisterTwister,

Some time ago you declined the submission of this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Netop_Remote_Control&redirect=no with the reason of lack of notability. I just want to point out that Netop Remote Control has been on the market for around 30 years and is one of the most widespread remote access tools in the world. Netop has millions of users and and cannot be regarded as not notable. Netop Remote Control is far more notable than most of the tools you can find on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_remote_desktop_software!

Many IT magazines and IT related web pages have produced reviews and comparisons where Netop Remote Control has been regarded as one of the best remote access tools. So I should think that it is fair to say that Netop Remote Control can be listed among all the other tools for remote access.

I should be happy to do whatever I can to improve the article and have more people contribute and elevate its content.

Thanks Kantonus Kantonus (talk) 14:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delta-convergence

Hello! You have patrolled the page Delta-convergence that I edited, and it remains tagged as orphan, despite having other pages pointing to it. Is there anything I can do to remedy the situation? Cyril CyrilTintarev (talk) 11:23, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CyrilTintarev Now removed. SwisterTwister talk 19:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: The above text was added manually to the bottom of the previous section without a section header. I added a section header just to help the user out so the comment does not become lost. I will also point the user to help on using Talk pages correctly. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 15:39, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:02:31, 13 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Labrodorite


SwisterTwister: Thank you for reviewing my page on the International Ocean Discovery Program. You noted that "this still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall." Could you please tell me where in the article additional references are needed? The majority of the references are third party, so I'd greatly appreciate any additional details you could provide. Thank you for your assistance.Labrodorite (talk) 14:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Labrodorite (talk) 14:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding Draft:Adrienne_Kress

I noticed you recently declined the above draft article for lack of notability. I am not sure I understand the logic of that considering the article has a number of highly reliable sources cited. I agree there are other reasons the article is not ready for primetime but notability does not seem to be an issue from my analysis. What am I missing? Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 15:30, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Koala Tea of Mercy The article simply still needs any further available in-depth third-party sources overall for solidity, as mentioned at the draft. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 19:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cheeseburger for you!

Thanks so much for reviewing the Dwayne Perkins page. As I am neither an experienced editor nor an experienced cook, the best food I can prepare is a cheeseburger. However, I do make very good cheeseburgers.

(This one is prepared diner style, not pub style. It is flattened and made with American cheese, which is the only cheese for a real cheeseburger, as other cheeses do not melt properly.) Marknashtx (talk) 18:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Hello, I'm Dat. I'm from Vietnam. Nice to meet you. Thank you for your review in my page Innocent but you can not delete my picture. it's all my work, okay? Baby cute01 (talk) 04:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Money Pump

It seems that you are quite busy, so let me be brief.

I occasionally consult Wikipedia, and fix mistakes when I find them in my own area of expertise. Recently, I looked up and fixed Dutch Book by adding a paragraph of clear explanation to central idea. I was surprised to find that Money Pump redirects to the Dutch book, and is not mentioned in the Dutch Book. The Dutch Book is an argument about preferences over lotteries which lead to subjective probabilties. The Money Pump is used within this argument to show that preferences must be transitive. These are two separate, but related arguments.

The redirect is wrong, since it confuses two similar arguments. My explanations provide a good introduction to the topic. If someone can do better, they should improve upon it. Reverting to the REDIRECT of Money Pump is goes back to a mistake and a confusion, abandoning an important clarification. Asaduzaman (talk) 06:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asaduzaman If you want to start an article, see WP:Your first article. You'll need to give it another title instead of simply going over that article. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 06:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister, please see the (long) message I left for Asaduzaman on my Talk page in response to his AGF request for assistance. After reading that please tell me what you think about moving the article in to the Draft namespace ? Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 07:03, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Koala Tea Of Mercy Of course, it can be moved to draft. Ah, that's quite a long message and thanks for commenting of course. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 07:07, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister, Normally I would not expend such time and energy on a new user, but IMHO Asaduzaman seems to be a skilled academic and if I can help him to become a skilled contributor to WP, that too is improving the encyclopedia. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 07:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Money Pump is a legitimate term and topic, and deserves an explanation. Furthermore, the writeup I made on it satisfies all the criteria discussed in the "First Article". I think a revert to my edits on MOney Pump would be perfectly satisfactory -- please note that I am ONLY FIXING A MISTAKE which I could do easily because the topic is one I am very familiar with -- I do not have time to write new articles for Wiki at the moment Asaduzaman (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winter Plummer

Hi, I see you marked Winter Plummer as reviewed. Her fate is really tragic, but do you think she is notable enough for inclusion? Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Arthistorian1977 I noticed and that's why I watchlisted it when I saw it. I'm certain so I'll search and investigate. SwisterTwister talk 17:32, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Great, thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 07:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Arthistorian1977 - Hi ST. They template you used didn't ping A so I added one that does. My apologies if I have made a mistake here. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 18:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I2PD, Delete as questionable for the applicable notability

1000+ i2pd router in the I2P network is "questionable for the applicable notability" for sure. Because people just use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by I2porignal (talk • contribs) 14:23, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello~

Hello SwisterTwister, Did you like reading about the amount of Portuguese castles I created? Wintery Time on the Grassland (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BT MyDonate

Hi SwisterTwister, I see that you have reviewed BT MyDonate which I created. Is it ok? Steven :)

- Steven (Editor) (talk) 00:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Steven (Editor) It seems to be but still add any further available in-depth third-party sources overall. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 00:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister Thank you for replying and if I can find anything else, I will do :) - Steven (Editor) (talk) 12:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review!

Hello! How can I fix the tables in this article I've created? List of World Champions in Judo Thanks for the help!

Pink-seoul-judo (talk) 16:09, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:41:39, 16 February 2016 review of submission by Cakulig


Hello, SwisterTwister! I've gone ahead and added additional sources from various places to compliment this article as suggested and have resubmitted the article for review. Do you have any further recommendations? Thanks!

Similar accounts

This user's name is opposite of your username. User talk:TwisterSwister — Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Spark (talk • contribs) 01:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ellery Sprayberry

Hi! I explained my edit. I also took it to the talk page. Blind reverts like yours are useless to all involved and a waste of time.Cebr1979 (talk) 09:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Question about a draft

Dear SwisterTwister,

Thanks for reviewing my submission !

I’ve read your comments and the guidelines that Wikipedia provides but I’m still not sure what exactly needs to be improved.

You pointed out that Wikipedia requires significant coverage and reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I tried to include various reliable articles about the Varkert project, both from conservative and liberal newspapers and magazines. There are more articles about the subject but most of them are unfortunately only in Hungarian and I haven’t managed to find more articles in English, as this was a local/national project. Also, I’m not sure if this was a problem or not, but because the project and the case started 14 years ago, these articles are not available on the internet.

I would really appreciate if you could give me specific examples about what was wrong with my article and what kind of reliable sources you were (or I should be) looking for.

Thanks a lot for your help!

(Hbsz2014 (talk) 12:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC))[reply]

13:07:03, 17 February 2016 review of submission by 69thstreet


Keeping the article Bars4Justice in draft mode seems odd due to the subject matter and historic significance of the film. I reviewed the sources and found that the film is in The Los Angeles Sentinel which is the only and most prominent long running African American Los Angeles newspaper. Reliable doesn't mean popular or mainstream or does it?

This was written in the Arizona Republic "ASU Black History Month ASU has a many events planned out during the month of February and many are open to the public. Options include a storytellers series, lectures, a session on traditional African dances, a mural project and a discussion on race and social injustice, which will follow a viewing of the documentary Bars4Justice. The short film was shot on location in Ferguson, Missouri, during the one-year anniversary of the shooting of Michael Brown. A full list of events can be viewed at eoss.asu.edu/student-engagement/culture/black-history."

I also found Reliable sources including University of Arizona newspaper written by a Professor who is using the film as a teaching guide.

Blacklivesmatter wiki lists the film.

19:40:10, 17 February 2016 review of submission by Ubskjt


I have set more deep references as per your suggestion so kindly accept my request !!! many thanx in advance

Agrarian Bonds in Peru

Hi SwisterTwister,

This page had been submitted for deletion when it was what I'd consider a stub article. At that time I made many additions to the page by adding enhanced verbiage, factual sources and citations. Rather than suggesting to delete the page and having that work go to waste, could you please provide me with some tips to improve the article? I appreciate the advice you can provide! PagoJusto (talk) 19:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trearddur Bay

Thanks for reviewing my AfD request on Trearddur Bay. I'm finding the instructions a bit confusing - do I have to do anything else, or just wait for the page to be deleted? Thanks. Tony Holkham (Talk) 20:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Holkham No, it will be deleted soon. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 20:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oops. I've done a bit more research, and it seems the name should be left as it is, especially as Commons just calls it Trearddur, and now the OS does, too, distinguishing it from the bay. Do I just delete the tag on the redirect page, or is it too late now? Sorry to be a nuisance. Tony Holkham (Talk) 20:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Of course you still can remove if you want. Cheers and alwqys happy to help, SwisterTwister talk 20:41, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Think I'll stick to what I know... Thanks again. Tony Holkham (Talk) 20:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04:32:03, 18 February 2016 review of submission by 76.19.85.215


This meets the criteria as defined, and as far as third parties go this seems to be all very reliable sources of recognition, including the New York Times.

See my Cleanup Discussion comments on the article's Talk page. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 15:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

11:02:48, 18 February 2016 review of submission by 120.60.134.85



Hi

Need to know how i can rectify it, as you have commented not enough depth from third party source, plz guide

17:29:46, 18 February 2016 review of submission by Solus2016



would like to know more about why the sources references on this text were deemed by this reviewer as not credible enough in terms of the subject's notablility as the are magazine and newspaper articles like in many other wikipedia articles. Thank you

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I really like your page. :) just wanted to give u a barnstar :) Ilovebeaniebabies8804! (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

?

Can you please explain this? Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jytdog I assumed it was obvious and self-explanatory as Onel5969 must not have been aware he voted twice. Also, I would've changed it to comment if it was not for that they were symmetrically alike. That's all, cheers. SwisterTwister talk 20:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see now. No it wasn't obvious to me. That is why I asked. Thanks for fixing that and for explaining. Jytdog (talk) 21:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. My bad. I don't know what happened there. At least I was consistent in my reasoning. Wouldn't it have been embarrassing if they were opposing votes? - Thanks for carrying my water, Swister. Onel5969 TT me 23:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia for World Heritage.
Message added 23:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Comment for you there from another user. North America1000 23:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject FUAlabama

Hi, this is not the first time that you have added {{WikiProject FUAlabama}} to a talk page (see here and here): it does not exist - WP:PREVIEWing your edits would have shown you that it's a redlink. --Redrose64 (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

01:42:33, 19 February 2016 review of submission by Muzilon


The "Notability" criteria here would seem to be WP:NACTOR rather than WP:CREATIVE? The subject had significant roles in two Oscar-nominated movies ("The Sullivans" and "Sweet and Low Down"), one Locarno Award winner ("He Walked By Night"), and one NBR Award winner ("A Walk In The Sun"). I have also added further references to bolster the article. Muzilon (talk) 01:42, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
I write this on thanks for the tireless reviews you do in new pages, especially toward the Portuguese articles I have translated. Winterysteppe (talk) 16:04, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

22:12:03, 19 February 2016 review of submission by Mimiwilcox


School Project page updated! Mimiwilcox (talk) 22:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Орден для вас!

Орден за заслуги
You have been a great Wikipedia user! WIKIPEDIARUS (talk) 00:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request intervention

P. G. George has been tagged for deletion. You had reviewed it earlier. The tagger has not even put any cautionary tag for improvement but straightaway deletion. Request you to review it once more.Meher Mansion (talk) 03:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help with a research project

SwisterTwister,

I am currently working with a group of professors at the University of Virginia and I would love to enlist your help. We are using Wikipedia as a source for our research, but I am curious to learn more about how the site works: how and who edits them, how and who flags mistakes and makes corrections, how and who decides the layout of a page?

I would greatly appreciate any help that you can give me, as you seem to be a seasoned contributor. If you are willing to discuss this further, please let me know.

Best — Preceding unsigned comment added by WatsonWahoo (talk • contribs) 17:46, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@WatsonWahoo: Please see Wikipedia:Research help and treat all information in Wikipedia articles with caution. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
Thank you for your untiring and diligent reviews of pages on South India. Prof TPMS (talk) 04:30, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Winifred Green

What kind of a rejection is that, "may be notable," but who cares, add more sources to satisfy your unwillingness to say it is or isn't notable?

How many more, 2, 5, 600?

Please link to the policy page that gives the exact number of sources I should add. 2600:380:992B:448B:882F:F3AE:A6A2:87C9 (talk) 12:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skip it, just delete the draft. I won't waste any more time on it. 2600:380:992B:448B:882F:F3AE:A6A2:87C9 (talk) 12:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Federal Way Public Academy

Hi SwisterTwister. You participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Federal Way Public Academy, where you supported a merge. The discussion is now at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2016 February 20#Federal Way Public Academy. You marked Federal Way Public Academy as reviewed. Does my rewrite change your mind about a merge? Would you support a standalone article? Cunard (talk) 01:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

For your quick patrolling of new articles that I've recently created. DPdH (talk) 08:43, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:24:40, 22 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Ilonam23


Could you please detail exactly what isn't notable? I have put in many references supporting the article. It would be good to know if it is just one bit of the page rather than the whole page that isn't notable so I know what to change. Thank you Ilonam23 (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)ilonam23Ilonam23 (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ilonam23 (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 15:47:48, 22 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Tractracccc


Hi, I submitted the draft and it was not accepted. May I ask for your advice on what I may be do more so that my article can be accepted? The comments are that the article did not show the notability of the organisation. However, I cited quite a number of sources about the organisation, which are books, websites, newspapers, etc. It seems to me that the organisation is quite notable regionally and internationally, and it is the only sizeable public relations organisation regionally, which made me have the interest to write the article. May I please ask for your help so that I could edit my article to meet the requirements?Tractracccc (talk) 15:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tractracccc (talk) 15:47, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

15:48:53, 22 February 2016 review of submission by Solus2016


Dear SisterTwister I have used references from several media outlets, including newspapers and magazines. I was hoping you could please elaborate on why you deemed these sources unreliable and not to prove the subject's notability. Thank you very much.

Apology for my confusion

I'm afraid I can't figure out whether the page John Goldsmith, whose speedy deletion you reviewed, should be contested or not — you can probably see I went back and forth trying to address the issue correctly. Maybe you can help. My feeling is that "John Goldsmith" should redirect to "John Goldsmith (disambiguation)" since none of the John Goldsmiths on the disambig page are of primary prominence. I apologize for my confusion and for asking for help; I've also asked User:Some Gadget Geek, who tagged the page, for help. Thank you for any clarification / guidance. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amy-Leigh Hickman

Hi,

I've made improvements to Draft:Amy-Leigh Hickman, so I was wondering could you. please check ot whenever you can?

Thanks Grangehilllover (talk) 10:15, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

12:58:08, 23 February 2016 review of submission by SarahDigitalDoctor


This is the first time I've written a Wikepedia page so some direction as to where I've not been neutral would be really appreciated. SwisterTwister I really appreciate your help. All advice most welcome!SarahDigitalDoctor (talk) 12:58, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

16:11:53, 23 February 2016 review of submission by Amanda Paul


Hi SwisterTwister, thanks for taking another look at my entry.

I'd understood from @Tokyogirl79: (original rejection) that if the film had been taken into the Museum's Collection that would make it notable in its own right and therefore there wasn't a need to confirm its notoriety in the press?

If that is the case, I believe it has been evidenced that the film is in the collection due to the ShowSpace it was exhibited in.

But please advise?

Thanks

Amanda Paul (talk) 16:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amanda Paul As mentioned, the article has potential but simply still needs any further available sources. Sincerely, SwisterTwister talk 19:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister I'm sorry, but that didn't address my question at all. What I was asking was, that the fact that it's been taken into a globally recognised Museum Museum of London is surely sufficient enough to establish its notability. The work, which is used to example how Londoners record their lives in the 21st Century (hence the title of the exhibition) had been compared by the curator to the likes of Samuel Pepys and James Boswell dairies in it's reflection of contemporary London Life.
As it will never receive a general cinema release, it cannot be expected to garner large press as a Movie would. But should that make it any less notable as a piece of work as it will be archived for the access of future generations?
Which additionally would appear to concur with the following:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(films)#cite_note-4
Other evidence of Notability "The film was selected for preservation in a national archive.[4]"
I believe editors are treating this as a commercially produced movie which would be open to reviews etc. but it is not that type of film.
Any further assistance gratefully received?

Review of submission by KatieTakacs

Draft: Highfive Technologies, Inc. If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list. "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it need not be the main topic of the source material. "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent. We have listed sources that meet these requirements. Please identify those that do not meet these requirements. KatieTakacs (talk) 17:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 20:49:52, 23 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Cagcgeospatial


The article I submitted was rejected because the reviewer was not convinced the subject was notable. I can't understand how this can be--the person is an academic professor and the article clearly demonstrated the following:

1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.

2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.

3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g., the IEEE).

5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon).

I'm not clear on what more you need. Please help!

Thanks, Cagcgeospatial (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC) Carol Crawford, cagcgeospatial--Cagcgeospatial (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC) Cagcgeospatial (talk) 20:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page curation

I just wanted to say, I noticed you are pretty often the person who curates my new pages. And I wanted to say thanks. And let you know that if you see something that needs attention - or any bad habits, please do drop me a note and let me know. 🍺 Antiqueight chat 01:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and a question.

Thanks for reviewing my Curt Massey article. I appreciate that.

I have one question related to the article. Soon after I posted it, an editor changed the "Death" section to a subsection under "Personal life." Until now, I have been putting "Death" as a separate main section in the biographical articles that I created. Is that incorrect? Should I have been putting it as a subsection of "Personal life" all along? Eddie Blick (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teblick Either can apply I suppose but it may also be beneficial to separate it to make each section exactly for its own. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 02:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah I see now. Frankly, it's nothing serious regardless and the current state is also acceptable. Wikipedia is not always like complex rocket science, SwisterTwister talk 02:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I appreciate the feedback. I think I'll continue to use a separate section. That seems to me to be a better approach. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:39, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Editor's Barnstar
Thank you very much for your reviewing my edits. May the Blessings of the Triple Gem always be with you !!! Mudithachampika (talk) 02:17, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

04:45:45, 24 February 2016 review of submission by 2602:306:BCD4:8610:CD0F:A592:6ED7:4213


Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for editing and your comments. I just want you to be clear that very few sources are available this township in China. I have am working on a PhD on this place and so I am the definitive expert on this writing in English anyways. Can you provide a number of sources required so that I can get you to approve of this article?

Thanks

---

2602:306:BCD4:8610:CD0F:A592:6ED7:4213 Simply add any further available. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:13, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Men On The Border

Hey, I was wondering if you could weigh in at Draft:Men On The Border. The user (PCMorphy72) has been very nice and patient and there's currently four sources that I think would be considered notability-giving reliable sources. This and this are reviews for their work. They're brief, but they're written by Arbetarbladet and Sunday Mercury. I know that the Mercury is a tabloid and they're sources that I tend to avoid using, but there's never any sort of set thing against tabloids unless they prove themselves to be out and out untrustworthy and this is a review, not an article about the band. This is an article that talks about an upcoming performance and this is a review of that performance. Both are published in the Gefle Dagblad, which is categorized as a major media outlet on the Gävle article, but they're written by different people.

This isn't heavy, but I think it's enough to where the group could weakly pass NBAND. There's supposed to be an event in October that could result in more coverage, but of course that's not a guarantee. My inclination is that we could accept it, but I'm just somewhat concerned about its survival in the mainspace since AfC articles do tend to get heavily scrutinized. I figured that a second opinion would be good before making any major moves. What do you think? I'll trust your opinion in this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyogirl79 My initial thoughts are that there's simply not enough and, at best, this could simply be accepted as such and wait for further better coverage but I'm still questionable about it, so we may have to draft it where it currently is for now. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
All right, thanks. In the meanwhile, since you thought a number of 4 sources could have been enough to justify notability, could you suggest (although you considered as "in passing" the mentioning on the very popular NME magazine) if it's the case to add one (or more) further source "till now" from this list? (for the notability of the last event mentioned in the article, i.e. an 8th source after sources [6] and [7]):
From other countries' news magazines, music news magazines, radio websites, etc., sometimes used as sources on the local version of Wikipedia:
http://www.lametiniweb.com/musica/syd-barrett-a-cambridge-un-tributo-live-per-il-10-anniversario-della-morte/
http://www.vandohalen.com.br/tributo-a-syd-barrett-sera-realizado-em-outubro/
http://kissfm.com.br/noticias/9646
http://www.conversationsabouther.net/syd-barrett-to-be-honoured-with-a-memorial-and-tribute-concert-music-news/
http://www.futuro.cl/blog/2016/02/confirman-concierto-en-homenaje-a-syd-barrett-en-cambridge/
http://www.radioacktiva.com/2016/syd-barret-de-pink-floyd-sera-homenajeado-127244.html
http://radiovirgendeitati.com.ar/?p=44216
http://www.elciudadano.cl/2016/02/18/258012/syd-barrett-sera-homenajeado-con-un-monumento-y-un-concierto-en-cambridge/
http://www.yamp.com.uy/noticia/syd-barrett-sera-homenajeado-con-un-monumento-y-un-concierto/
http://estaciondelsiglo.net/?p=37455
http://canchageneral.com/un-homenaje-a-la-altura-de-syd-barrett/
http://www.redfm.gr/to-cambridge-etimazete-na-timisi-ton-syd-barrett-ton-pink-floyd-me-ekdilosis-ke-sinavlia/
http://warp.la/cambridge-hara-un-monumento-a-syd-barrett-113569
  • I've skimmed down the long list, removing those which looked like pretty personal blogs (although about news), but finding these below more relevant than others:
http://folking.com/tag/men-on-the-border/
http://www.tvcrun.com/pink-floyd-founding-member-syd-barrett-to-be-honoured-with-memorial-and-tribute-concert/
http://celebrità.com/syd-barrett-a-cambridge-un-tributo-live-per-il-10-anniversario-della-morte/
http://www.sopitas.com/583181-syd-barrett-sera-homenajeado-con-un-monumento-y-un-concierto-en-cambridge/
http://www.trucosnoticia.com/syd-barrett-sera-homenajeado-con-un-monumento-y-un-concierto-en-cambridge/
http://www.plasticosydecibelios.com/101800-2/
http://bluefm.com.ar/2016/02/17/homenaje-a-syd-barret/
http://noticiastraffic.com/noticias/homenaje-a-syd-barrett-en-cambridge/
PCMorphy72 (talk) 21:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tuleap (project management)‎‎

Care to comment at the AFD for Tuleap (project management)‎‎. I would like to check if I'm out-to-lunch or not. I suspect that a user forum or similar exists for the subject as it appears that several editors have arrived to protest its deletion. I could be wrong about its notability, but it clearly has fans. If you can find anything, then I am clearly mistaken. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Special:NewPagesFeed favour

Hey there, I have 2 pages waiting on the Special:NewPagesFeed and I am wondering if it is that they are not good enough or have just been missed - since I patrol a little I know they could slip by easily - but I also don't approve pages when they have a problem but I don't know enough to comment or fix so I skip on to the next. Since you patrol I was wondering if when you are doing it next you could filter for my pages and see if they are ok? Martina Devlin and Kerry Hardie. Pages created before and after have been patrolled so I'm curious...This is totally a favour - I won't be remotely insulted or upset if you don't/can't. I'm just being impatient. 🍺 Antiqueight chat 13:32, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thank you for your work on the new page patrol 🍺 Antiqueight chat 17:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rod Silva (businessman).
Message added 08:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America1000 08:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:Kgilchrist99/Donald Gilchrist

Hello SwisterTwister. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Kgilchrist99/Donald Gilchrist, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: David, it appears there is or was a Canadian figure skater of this name, who might possibly be notable. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the templated message. For similar reasons, I'm not going to link BITE. Maybe you could have talked to the new editor first or googled up that name or moved it into daftspace? (Ooh, I hate, hate, hate doing this sort of stuff... We are still WP:NPP wiki-friends, yeah?) Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

14:16:26, 26 February 2016 review of submission by DragonSnake


The proposed draft (A.G. Huntsman Award) page is no less notable than other similar existing wiki pages on named awards in the fields of oceanography and ecology. Such as:
G. Evelyn Hutchinson Award
A.C. Redfield Lifetime Achievement Award
Robert H. MacArthur Award
Maurice Ewing Medal
Roger Revelle Medal
DragonSnake (talk) 14:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, DragonSnake - there are quite a few articles on Wikipedia that suck. Doesn't mean that new ones should also be allowed which don't meet Wikipedia standards. Over time, standards have improved, 5-10 years ago, almost anything was allowed on. As time goes on, we weed out the articles which shouldn't be here. But there are only about 2500 active volunteer editors, and over 5 million articles, so some crap still remains. Your argument is called other stuff exists - not a valid argument for inclusion. We need about 3 in-depth articles from independent sources to show the award is notable. Hope this helps. Onel5969 TT me 14:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

19:47:21, 26 February 2016 review of submission by Steve Vengrenovich


19:53:12, 26 February 2016 review of submission by Steve Vengrenovich


21:30:44, 26 February 2016 review of submission by Bonanza425


Can reviewer please further clarify his/her comments(give examples if possible)Thank-YouBonanza425 (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help with editing.

Hi SwisterTwister,

Recently I translated an article, but I have a problem to finish the article. Can you help me?

Grettings, LuisComonfort (talk) 02:46, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

08:49:04, 27 February 2016 review of submission by George Li


My reference source is mainly in Chinese media, as the person is famous in China, as one of the top scientists. Is the notability an issue due to media language? George Li (talk) 08:49, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First thanks, after, This user Gareth Griffith-Jones is deleting big informations

Hi, for start i dont know how to say a big thank you for all your contributions, but, look this please, to the user User:Gareth Griffith-Jones want delete all that i am improving, and like i imagine with other articles that i not edit, he want to delete information with or without sources. Look at the edit war of the Spanish Mastiff: Revision history, and after came this Pointing breed: Revision history. help now with this please. thanks--Vvven (talk) 18:07, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vven I actually seen no serious concerns with him and he has actually explained why with most of his contributions. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 18:27, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

but check what he delete and ok, they say his cause, but the mine too, he delte information with sources of the dog breed club source, of spanish kennel club source, or the breed official association, or books, affirmating that it says, and he just delete, and in the pointing breed article even not let put links to the breeds i add, check please--Vvven (talk) 18:32, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
I want to give you a star for the amount of work you do. and please, do go on vacation. Winterysteppe (talk) 04:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05:59:36, 29 February 2016 review of submission by LAH109



The reason given for rejecting the event is that it's not notable enough. I beg to disagree. In addition to the references already in the submitted WIKI article, there have been more attention to this event in the last 3 weeks.

On the 30th anniversary of the walkout, 17 of the 35 tabulators held a reunion in Manila. The Filipino media was clamouring for interviews with the tabulators, and they agreed to several requests from many media organisations. The walkout by the tabulators was described as a pivotal event leading to the people power revolution at EDSA which saw the overthrow of dictator Ferdinand Marcos.

Here are links to print and TV interviews and commentary over the past three weeks:

http://www.interaksyon.com/…/never-forget--30-years-later-c…

http://www.interaksyon.com/…/neverforget--we-didnt-do-it-to…

http://news.abs-cbn.com/…/poll-tabulators-in-1986-snap-elec…

http://news.abs-cbn.com/…/what-1986-snap-polls-tabulators-s…

http://news.abs-cbn.com/…/…/02/09/16/teditorial-unforgotten…

http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/767885/1986-comelec-tabulators-fear-marcos-return

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GOgONxqaHE

http://www.gmanetwork.com/…/edsa-30-series-comelec-35-mulin…

http://www.gmanetwork.com/…/comelec-35-umalis-sa-kalagitnaa…

http://www.gmanetwork.com/…/flashback-feb-9-1986-nag-walkou…

https://www.facebook.com/historywithlourd/videos/1058792730849865/?__mref=message#

http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/video/360319/balitanghali/comelec-35-walkout-30-taon-na-mula-nang-maganap


Please reconsider and I would appreciate any help to get it across the line. Thanks.

LAH109 First, please carefully see WP:Referencing for beginners as I mentioned earlier and also please incorporate any solid in-depth third-party sources overall to improve the article. Afterwards, I may be able to see if the article is better acceptable. Sincerely, SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is WP:ANI#User:SwisterTwister U5 nominations. 103.6.159.86 (talk) 08:13, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Horvath (actor) article

@SwisterTwister firs of all thank you very much for your massage, and for your dedication to the community of wikipedia,I really appreciate it. As you can see I have made the article about the actor Daniel Horvath from the Spanish language and really used all the valued sources in order to make perfect contribution to wikipedia and to its community. Therefore if you can go through the page and if you see and approve it I kindly ask you to take out the pop up window about the orphan article (because it has all the necessary links to the related articles) and the biography has all the necessary situation ( the article in Spanish and Russian all have been approve) Thank you very much again for your time and grateful contribution for the society of wikipedia. Looking forward.--Anonimoushh (talk) 15:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anonimoushh What the article actually needs are other articles, not WikiProject or talk pages, but other actual encyclopedia articles, because there currently are none. For example, linking his current article at articles for his films will connect his article and thus no longer be orphaned. Sincerely, SwisterTwister talk 19:36, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@SwisterTwister thank you so much for your answer I really appreciate it, I made all the links for the official webs and his films therefore I really hope you will like it and accept it as a good job. Thank you and looking forward to hear from you.--Anonimoushh (talk) 11:51, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh SwisterTwister sorry I didn't put the link, here it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Horvath_(actor) Hope you'll Like all the additional work, by the way I did what you've recommended. --Anonimoushh (talk) 23:08, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

17:10:54, 29 February 2016 review of submission by Cakulig


Hello SwisterTwister, I think I forgot to sign my previous message and my request for re=review may have fallen through the cracks. Can you please have a look at this article and let me know if anything further is needed? Thanks!


Cakulig (talk) 17:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Abramski v. United States

Thanks for patrolling my article. As this is my first complete article, I would very much appreciate any constructive criticism. Additionally, do you think it is a good idea to nominate this this article for Wikipedia:Ga? Do you see anything that needs any work before I nominate it? Thanks. WannaBeEditor (talk) 05:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WannaBeEditor Hmm, the article is informative and sourced but I'm not entirely certain of "Good Article" so you could ask at the Good Article page and see anyone comments. Sincerely, SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you comment on what you don't like (the cause of the Hmm. lol)? WannaBeEditor (talk) 05:37, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There's actually nothing of concern for me, the "Hmm" is because I'm simply uncertain of what people would think GA-wise. Sincerely, SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Hi David / SwisterTwister and thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia. I am new at Wikipedia but very passionate about art, nature and science. So I plan to contribute much more to Wikipedia in the following years ! Pablo Dominguez Klein (talk) 08:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:26:16, 1 March 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by AlexisCarlson


Hi SwisterTwister,

In November you reviewed my page and declined it due to the lack of showing the subjects notability. The page was then deleted by your colleague Anthony Bradbury. We have made a lot of edits since to the copy with the guidelines from Wikipedia. Please could you be so kind and review the updated version?

Look forward to hearing from you.

Best wishes Alexis AlexisCarlson (talk) 14:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


AlexisCarlson (talk) 14:26, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stale

I would like to start a discussion at CSD:Talk to discuss how best to handle some of the stale userdrafts which do not currently fall neatly into any of the existing CSD categories.

I wanted to start with a brief history and started to write that you undertook the enormous task of going through Category:Stale userspace drafts to identify pages which deserve deletion. However, even as I started writing those words I realize I did not know the precise history. I’m not sure with your recent efforts started with that, started with something else and it became that or if your process is something other than I just described. Would you be so kind as to give me a brief history so that I can introduce the subject appropriately?

My intention is to point out that almost all of your nominations are quite clear-cut, but there may be a few that deserve further discussion. At the moment, it isn’t clear to me whether the best approach is to simply accept the current CSD criteria which might mean that a few of the useless drafts should simply be retained, whether we ought to tweak the current criteria to cover some of these useless pages, whether we ought to identify a new CSD to cover the situations or something else entirely. I hope to open up a discussion but I’d like to make sure I start with facts.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:50, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sphilbrick When I started at Unused Drafts, I simply skipped or watchlisted anything that was questionable and may need MfD. Now recently, when I noticed so many of these were obvious starting companies and thus unlikely notable, I simply tag it as U5 if I believe it's simply not needed.

For example: John Jones started an article for his company with only the basic information (Jones & Associates Company was founded in 2011 by John Jones in Cleveland, Ohio) with nothing but their own websites and a few press releases. If it was of serious concern, I considered tagging for G11 and U5 especially because some of these cases, the article was started the exact year or shortly before the company started (I.e. Company started in 2011 and the article was started in 2011). Also, this was the same case with bands also, where it was obviously a band member who started the article with nothing else.

It's worth noting I would execute my own searches to find any available sources and if I found only their press releases and own websites or perhaps simply nothing at all, I would tag it as G11 or U5. This goes for MfD also, where a user would nominate an article with nothing but basic information, I would speedy tag it instead. If some of these were main article space, A7 would be applicable but but it is not (at least for user and draftspace). I know someone would think that some of these are a "work in progress" and it's still a draft with potential but some of these simply seem obvious enough to not be notable and not needed.

I know there's some talk at CSD:Talk about applying an expiration date (think of it as a close G13) and also to where drafts can also be deleted if the user had no enthusiasm for Wikipedia or any serious interests. It's also interesting to mention that WP:G13 actually mentions it could be applicable for user drafts but my understanding of it is that it needs to be explicitly tagged as AfC (not simply the Article Wizard itself). It's also worth noting that I would search to see if there was and currently still is a Wikipedia mainspace article and, of these, I would notice they had actually been deleted years before, so naturally, I would speedy tag it as G11 if that's how the original deletion went. Recently, a few cases, I'll simply redirect it to the existing article if it seems convincing enough.

Sincerely and thanks for your work and attention, SwisterTwister talk 21:23, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thanks for reviewing the Helen Claire page that I created. I appreciate your help. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:04, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, for the welcome. I'm looking forward to expanding wikipedia with information about my local music scene. Rockenthusiast1979 (talk) 01:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breanne Düren.
Message added 10:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Question for you there from another user. North America1000 10:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Mach (2nd nomination).
Message added 10:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America1000 10:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

Hi, I just wanted to say thanks for the welcome and for reviewing my recently added content. I'm very new to this and just finding my way, so the welcome was appreciated. Labrowp (talk) 16:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, SwisterTwister. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khurshid Ali Khan - Ghazal.
Message added 10:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

A question has been posted at the discussion for you (by another user). North America1000 10:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
thanks! JW McGill (talk) 13:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hardap Nature Reserve

Hi SwisterTwister. I resubmitted the article about the Namibian park. Originally it was lacking reliable sources. It has sources from the South West African Administration, the Namibian Ministry of Environment and Tourism, the University of Pretoria, The Nambian Newspaper and the New Era Newspaper among others. The article should be moved to "Hardap Recreation Resort" though, since this seems to be the offical name. There are 2 interwikis btw: de:Erholungsgebiet Hardap and uk:Рекреаційний курорт Гардап. Best regards, --Gereon K. (talk) 15:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Muzzo evaluation

Thanks. There's no rush and you are probably right he lacks notability.Oceanflynn (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gyges’ ring

You might like to look at Frame harp as well. Biscuittin (talk) 19:48, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi, sorry for bothering you but do you know how I can change my Wikipedia username? I know I can change it but I really don't know how to... Noxiuzpr (talk) 07:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noxiuzpr See WP:CHU. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Noxiuzpr (talk) 07:35, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 08:41:47, 5 March 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Vikash rajendran


Vikash rajendran (talk) 08:41, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Question (2)

Hello there,

I saw that you reviewed this page, there is only one issue at the page namely the elevation has an error in the infobox, how to fix this?

Regards, BerendWorst (talk) 12:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme sundar page has been modified according to your review

Hi User:SwisterTwister,

Draft Supreme sundar is modified according to your review, please review that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vikash rajendran (talk • contribs) 20:33, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

20:47:31, 5 March 2016 review of submission by Vikash rajendran



Hi,

I have given reliable sources only, please review once again. all sources are from reputed links example-hindhu, times of india, deccan chronicle, even his name is in wikipedia also i have added that link also. i have got the whole information from what you have replied below there itself there is a find source option. From there only i have collected. please go for the links once again.

21:16:05, 5 March 2016 review of submission by Vikash rajendran



Hi,

I have again added some more informations. please review this now and revert back. thanks

A cookie for you!

Thanks! Shftin2gear (talk) 21:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:56:46, 5 March 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Bttfreporter


Thanks for the review. The Flux Capacitors have countless references. I just didn't think that anything amounts anywhere close to CNN contacting the band to feature them, bringing them into their Los Angeles bureau, shelling out money for the story, and having Rocsi Diaz do the interview. CNN's interest should eclipse all the small fries. Or is that not the case? If not, I'll add a bunch more references. Just can't get more credible than CNN.

Bttfreporter (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

02:36:58, 6 March 2016 review of submission by Techapto


May I submit that the references cited are from extremely credible media sources few of which date back to the year 1857 (The Times Of India) which is India's leading English daily. Also online media properties have published in-depth coverage on the subject. I would request you to kindly review the suggested references as these are not trivial and have been acknowledged for their depth and substance. Seeking your support.

హౌరా - మాల్డా టౌన్ ప్యాసింజర్

Looks like that although you tagged హౌరా - మాల్డా టౌన్ ప్యాసింజర్ as not English it didn't show up on the pages that need translating page! Wgolf (talk) 03:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind greeting! Margot.irvine (talk) 03:57, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SwisterTwister&oldid=708537050"