Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mihalache1990 (talk | contribs) at 16:10, 7 January 2018 (→‎ioana mihalache: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts
    "WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion

    Government High School,Remta

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Connectnext321 (talk) 08:23, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I nominated it for deletion due to the issues you mentioned, Hut 8.5. My reasoning is it is better to leave the title without an article than to have it tied up in a non article like it was. I would suggest that Connectnext321 leave it in user space. I'd have preferred leaving the title vacant and let him take it through AfC. But it was your decision and you made it, so what can we do now? John from Idegon (talk) 21:26, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, both of you...I am going to boldly move the title to Draft. That's what we have draftspace for, ya? I absolutely do not understand why an empty article would be restored to mainspace, especially since it is still essentially empty 5 hours later. There was never any substantial content and I think we need something more than an infobox before it should be in mainspace. John from Idegon (talk) 21:31, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Drone Detector

    This is not an advertisement as claimed by the deleting administrator it is a legitimate entry about the company and the main product in an emerging industry. Saying "Drone Detector" (a registered trademark) is an ad is tantamount to saying "Kleenex" [1] is an ad. Please review and undelete if you concur. —2601:2C1:8600:1BC3:4815:6B32:96E4:ED21 (talk) 19:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Nine point nine nine times out of ten any newer user or anon claiming an article about a company is "a legitimate entry" is defending what they know is a blatant SEO attempt. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:09, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleenex
    Another indicator of promotional intent, is an obsession with the fact that the subject has obtained a trademark. It is possible that an actual impartial article could be written about this firm; but the deleted content was not that article. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:49, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Kuruvi poster.jpg

    Restore legitimate image that was properly uploaded by me, complying with WP:FUR. The one uploaded by the now inactive user has been removed from the article, and the user is unlikely to return anytime soon. —Kailash29792 (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    The Addams Family (upcoming film)

    I want to revive this article as a redirect page, and I also want to use the content that I had put on the deleted article on my upcoming draft page of the same name. The article was deleted because it wasn't through with production yet, and I want to revive this as a redirect page until some time when the film comes closer towards its release date that I can then integrate the draft into the redirect page and make it into an article. Superchunk22 (talk) 03:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Akhil Talreja

    Akhil Talreja is a notable DJ and the content of the article is properly sourced. This article should not be deleted. —103.203.231.174 (talk) 06:32, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Botmetric

    Need to update the content —SakshiGaurav (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Fish and karate (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Sarita Raghuvanshi

    Hello. Article of Sarita Raghuvanshi had been deleted. It was up from several months. No prior notification/clarification was seeked. It mentions 'unambiguous advertising' as the reason, but there was no such content and all the content on her article is verifiable by media links. Still if there is any content that you may find promotional, kindly edit it and restore the page. Thanks! —Anand.bhate1 (talk) 13:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Randykitty (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Corey Maison

    DGG (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) speedily deleted the article under A7 at 00:05 on 2 January 2018 (UTC). Please userfy the last version of the page that I edited to user:fourthords/Corey Maison. —— fourthords | =Λ= | 16:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user DGG (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
    information Note: While the deletion was in error because I had previously declined the A7 request for good reasons, you need to contact him directly for a restore. Regards SoWhy 16:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    the part that didn't need revdel for copyvio was restored to the user space as requested. DGG ( talk ) 23
    26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

    File:What I Can Do For You 1995.jpg

    I would like to reuse this image at What I Can Do for You and then replace the other image. The 1995 re-release was more successful on the UK Singles Chart than the original release. —George Ho (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    OnBuy

    OnBuy.com is the fastest growing UK marketplace, with national ITV TV coverage twice in 2017, and planned more for 2018, 10,000 hits per day and 11,000 most popular website in the UK (Alexa) and growing. Furthermore, BBC national news twice, with one planned for Jan 2018, already recorded and post production. Deleting was unfair and the site is very notable. —UKBizMan (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OnBuy, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Co-operative Socialism

    (no text provided) John courtneidge (talk) 12:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    César Baena

    César Baena is a well know Nordic Skier. The first Southamerican Nordic Skier in the World Cup. Guinness World Record for the longest journey on rollerskis. Many information available in Google that afirmates all this. —Euroski (talk) 14:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Wu Yongning

    move to my user space —Jax 0677 (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC) --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Can do, standby one. A Traintalk 21:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
     Done Now live at User:Jax 0677/Wu Yongning. A Traintalk 21:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Robert C. Jackson

    I, Jpopxfg, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jpopxfg (talk) 18:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Shia Channel

    My page was deleted for proposed deletion, please restore it. —103.196.78.121 (talk) 19:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shia Channel, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 19:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:UnderSecretary-General of the United Nations

    This talk page was mistakenly deleted. It should instead be moved back to Talk:Under-Secretary-General of the United Nations to match the article. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Mg beatz

    The draft was recreated 2 weeks after it was deleted per WP:G13. Since the deletion was only a G13 deletion, the deleted revisions for the draft can and should be restored. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Creating Draft:BFFs (film)

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) JoannaG31 (talk) 01:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:C Moon by Wings pink label UK vinyl.jpg

    The text is too factual for US copyright. Nevertheless, I'm unsure about UK copyright; UK originality threshold is very low, yet copyright of unoriginal typographic works lasts 25 years. The previous versions of the file should be undeleted, so I can revert back to its original, bigger size. —George Ho (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

     Done I don't agree that it is too "factual" for copyright to apply, so that it is public domain. However I have reverted to the older version, as there was excessive reduction. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    The X-Plan Group

    Good morning, This article was marked for speedy deletion by Bishonen on 12/30 for promotional reasons. I have accepted the suggested changes of my user name (new username: Diego Antolini) in order to meet Wikipedia's criteria, so I would like to have the draft restored in order to make the necessary changes into the article to meet the Wikipedia criteria. I understand that the article was not yet reviewed by Wikipedia administrators as it was only in the form of a draft and I hadn't submitted it for review at the time of the block. I have spent hours in uploading the material and wouldn't want to have to start the article from zero. I hope you can accommodate my request. Thanks. Diego Antolini —Diego Antolini (talk) 07:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    @Diego Antolini: I can e-mail the content to you, but I don't think this organization meets our notability guideline for organizations at all. Unless if you can provide some reliable secondary sources, I am inclined to reject this request. Alex Shih (talk) 08:12, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Good morning Alex, The X-Plan Group has written in 5 national magazines (with 2 of them, NEXUS and PUNTO ZERO, the collaboration is ongoing), has been mentioned in several newspapers's articles in Italy, has been mentioned by one article in Argentina, has been hosted in a series of 9 Radio Interviews in Central Italy, and has been invited to talk at International Conferences such as the San Marino Symposium of Ufology. The Group has worked as Regional Representative for the C.U.N. (National Ufology Center) for 5 years, has published two books in Italy (one under my name and one under the name of the three founders), and contributed with an article in two more books in Italy. The X-Plan Group will be mention in a book authored by an Italian photographer living in London for its contribution to the study and research in the "fringe" sciences. Would this be sufficient to meet Wikipedia Notability Guidelines? Of course I can provide links to all of the above if it can help, but please advise whether I can post the links here or just finis my final draft of the page with all reference and submit to you administrators for final review. Thanks a lot for helping me, I strongly believe TXP can be a valid contribution to the Wikipedia Project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diego Antolini (talk • contribs) 15:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    No. We don't cite anything the subject has written/said, anything that has been put out on the subject's behalf, quotables, name-drops, or proxies of the subject. Everything you describe above falls into one of those categories. We also do not accept "notability-by-osmosis". You need to show that the X-Plan Group has been written about in some depth by multiple third-party sources that have no connection, direct or indirect, to the subject. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Abel Sánchez

    I, Jaredzimmerman, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jared Zimmerman (talk) 08:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Hi Hi Hi by Wings pink label A-side 1972 UK vinyl.jpg

    Same reason as #File:C Moon by Wings pink label UK vinyl.jpg, i.e. the file should be reverted back to previous bigger version. —George Ho (talk) 11:09, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Baron & Budd asbestos memo

    I am researching the case of the so-called Asbestos cheat sheet and am interested in the seeing the deleted article for research purposes only. I am also looking into the talk page and the changelog to see if an edit war took place over the content in the past years. Again, this is for research purposes only. —Wikigenstein (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC) --Wikigenstein (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Do you have an email address associated with the account? If so, I think one of the admins would be able to email you the last known revision. (The article won't be unilaterally restored because of WP:Articles for deletion/Baron & Budd asbestos memo, but I would not be surprised if an admin emailed you the contents prior to deletion.) —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 23:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jéské Couriano: I do, will they be able to email me the talk page as well? --Wikigenstein (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Wikigenstein: you can always go to Deletionpedia to read articles that have been deleted from Wikipedia. In this case http://deletionpedia.org/en/Baron_%26_Budd_asbestos_memo is the article you're looking for. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks @Anachronist:! That's a good start but I also want the talk page and generally, want to understand where deleted pages can be accessed --Wikigenstein (talk) 08:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Chennai Super Kings Roster

    The template was deleted last year as the team was inactive for two seasons. The team is back now and the template will be used in three articles: 1, 2 and 3. —Dee03 15:38, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Alan Gandy

    I, Codfillets, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Codfillets (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Mr Gandy has achieved more since the article was originally declined. Any reconsideration so that it can be expanded upon would be appreciated.

    Regards

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:38, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Mhairi Threlfall

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Gogaria2 (talk) 19:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Rebtel logo.jpg

    The previous versions should be undeleted; the logo is ineligible for Swedish and US copyright. —George Ho (talk) 10:04, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    manish om singhania

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Abhiwebby (talk) 15:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (TonyBallioni (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • They have already contacted me. I will not be restoring as a draft because it would immediately be G11 eligible again. I have offered to email them the text if they want, but if they just post it again without changed it will be eligible for deletion in any namespace. It really needs a complete rewrite. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Black Colossus WT.jpg

    Deleted after another copy was uploaded to Commons. However, the Commons copy has now been deleted as nonfree, so this copy should be reinstated. —The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC) The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:DACH

    I, Tcs75, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tcs75 (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Qfennessy/sandbox/Fancy Canadian (cocktail)

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Quentin Fennessy (talk) 19:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC) sandbox/Fancy Canadian (cocktail)[reply]

    An Astronaut's Prayer

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 68.191.115.134 (talk) 20:49, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. This page has absolutely no chance of being accepted as long as it only consists of the text of a prayer, FWIW. Hut 8.5 23:24, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:Lynn Johnson (makeup artist)

    The deletion rationale given was G8; however, this never applied, because the parent page did exist. Not only that, but the talk page also had an archived requested move that I closed. All in all, I think this is a huge TROUT for the deleting administrator. —ToThAc (talk) 23:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Mark John McEncroe

    Page was deleted suddenly without warning or discussion with no opportunity to revise the page. Reason for deletion G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: —Kazbah99 (talk) 00:33, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Athaenara (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences.
    @Athaenara: Your deletion rationale points to three user talk pages with absolutely no information on the page in question as "see also" pages; was this intentional or an autofill blunder? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:58, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Usually (but not always) what's pertinent is self-evident on user talk pages which I link in deletion summaries. In this case, it's not, but can be found in those users' deleted contributions which are visible only to those with the requisite administrator permissions.
    Users Suzo oz (talk · contribs) and Kazbah99 (talk · contribs) wrote most of the page. User Pianolover46 (talk · contribs) added an external link to his/her website; that user's talk page has several messages about what we on wikipedia call link-spamming.
    I won't go on the warpath after anyone who restores it and/or puts it in draft space for de-spamming, but I won't play handmaiden to such an effort either. – Athaenara ✉ 13:29, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Mid-impact Wikipedia essays

    Now that Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews is considered to be of Mid-impact by the WikiProject Essays —RekishiEJ (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:High-impact Wikipedia essays

    The same as the argument I made for the request for undeletion of Category:Mid-impact Wikipedia essays —RekishiEJ (talk) 15:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    ioana mihalache

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Mihalache1990 (talk) 16:10, 7 January 2018 (UTC) I am ioana mihalache, a model, actress, beauty queen from Romania and I won Miss Universe Romania 2017 on 1st November, after I won this competition in my country I saw that I have a Wikipedia page on my name and everything that was there was proven with link and articles. On 3rd January my page disappeared and I followed all the steps to get it back. Now I am sending a message here and hopefully I will have this issue resolve. Thank you[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=819123585"