|Languages||Old English and Old Frisian, sometimes Latin|
|5th through 11th centuries|
|This article is part of the series:|
Society and Culture
|Power and organization|
Anglo-Saxon runes are runes used by the early Anglo-Saxons as an alphabet in their writing. The characters are known collectively as the futhorc (or fuþorc), from the Old English sound values of the first six runes. The futhorc was a development from the 24-character Elder Futhark. Since the futhorc runes are thought to have first been used in Frisia before the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain, they have also been called Anglo-Frisian runes. They were likely used from the 5th century onward, recording Old English and Old Frisian.
After the 9th century, they were gradually supplanted in Anglo-Saxon England by the Old English Latin alphabets introduced by Irish missionaries. Runes were no longer in common use by the year 1000 and were banned under Cnut the Great (r. 1016–1036).
There are competing theories about the origins of the Anglo-Saxon futhorc. One theory proposes that it was developed in Frisia and from there spread later to England. Another holds that runes were first introduced to England from Scandinavia where the futhorc was modified and then exported to Frisia. Both theories have their inherent weaknesses, and a definitive answer may come from further archaeological evidence.
The early futhorc was identical to the Elder Futhark, except for the split of ᚨ a into three variants ᚪ āc, ᚫ æsc and ᚩ ōs, resulting in 26 runes. This was necessary to account for the new phoneme produced by the Ingvaeonic split of allophones of long and short a. The earliest ᚩ ōs rune is found on the 5th-century Undley bracteate. ᚪ āc was introduced later, in the 6th century. The double-barred ᚻ hægl characteristic of continental inscriptions is first attested as late as 698, on St Cuthbert's coffin; before that, the single-barred Scandinavian variant was used.
In England, the futhorc was further extended to 28 and finally to 33 runes, and runic writing in England became closely associated with the Latin scriptoria from the time of Anglo-Saxon Christianization in the 7th century. The futhorc started to be replaced by the Latin alphabet from around the 7th century, but it was still sometimes used up until the 10th or 11th century. In some cases, texts would be written in the Latin alphabet, but runes would be used logographically in place of the word it represented, and þorn and wynn came to be used as extensions of the Latin alphabet. By the Norman Conquest of 1066, it was very rare and disappeared altogether shortly thereafter. From at least five centuries of use, fewer than 200 artefacts bearing futhorc inscriptions have survived.
Several famous English examples mix runes and Roman script, or Old English and Latin, on the same object, including the Franks Casket and St Cuthbert's coffin; in the latter, three of the names of the Four Evangelists are given in Latin written in runes, but "LUKAS" (Saint Luke) is in Roman script. The coffin is also an example of an object created at the heart of the Anglo-Saxon church that uses runes. A leading expert, Raymond Ian Page, rejects the assumption often made in non-scholarly literature that runes were especially associated in post-conversion Anglo-Saxon England with Anglo-Saxon paganism or magic.
|Rune image||UCS||Old English name||Name meaning||Transliteration||IPA|
|ᚦ||þorn||"thorn"||þ, ð||[θ], [ð]|
|ᚩ||ōs||"[a] god", also "mouth" following the Latin||o||[o], [oː]|
|ᚳ||cēn||"torch"||c||[k], [kʲ], [tʃ]|
|ᚷ||gyfu||"gift"||g||[ɡ], [ɣ], [j], ([x])?, ([gʲ])?|
|ᚻ||hægl||"hail (precipitation)"||h||[h], [x], [ç]|
|ᛇ||ēoh||"yew"||eo||[ç], ([eo, eːo])?|
|ᛝ||Ing||"Ing (a hero)"||ŋ||[ŋg], [ŋ]|
|ᛡ||īor||"eel"||ia, io||([jɑ, jo], [jɑː, joː])?|
The first 24 of these directly continue the Elder Futhark letters, extended by five additional runes, representing additional vowels (á, æ, ý, ia, ea), comparable to the five forfeda of the ogham alphabet.
The letter sequence, and indeed the letter inventory is not fixed. Compared to the letters of the rune poem given above,
- f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i j eo p x s t b e m l ŋ œ d a æ y io ea
the Thames scramasax has 28 letters, with a slightly different order, and eðel missing:
- f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i io eo p x s t b e ŋ d l m j a æ y ea
- 30. ᛢ cweorð kw, a modification of peorð
- 31. ᛣ calc "chalice" k (when doubled appearing as ᛤ kk)
- 32. ᛥ stan "stone" st
- 33. ᚸ gar "spear" g (as opposed to palatalized ᚷ ȝ)
Of these four additional letters, only the cweorð rune fails to appear epigraphically. The stan shape is found on the Westeremden yew-stick, but likely as a Spiegelrune. The calc rune is found on the Bramham Moor Ring, Kingmoor Ring, the Ruthwell Cross, and Bewcastle Cross inscriptions. The gar rune is found on the Bewcastle Cross inscription, along with the doubled calc rune in select locations.
Cotton Domitian A.ix reaches thus a total of 33 letters, according to the transliteration introduced above arranged in the order
- f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i j eo p x s t b e m l ŋ d œ a æ y ea io cw k st g
In the manuscript, the runes are arranged in three rows, glossed with Latin equivalents below (in the third row above) and with their names above (in the third row below). The manuscript has traces of corrections by a 16th-century hand, inverting the position of m and d. Eolh is mistakenly labelled as sigel, and in place of sigel, there is a kaun-like letter ᚴ, corrected to proper sigel ᛋ above it. Eoh is mislabelled as eþel. Apart from ing and ear, all rune names are due to the later scribe, identified as Robert Talbot (died 1558).
Another futhorc row is found in Cotton Galba A.ii.
The 9th-century Codex Sangallensis 878 (attributed to Walahfrid Strabo) records an abecedarium anguliscum in three lines. The first two lines list the standard 29 runes, i.e. the 24 derived from Elder Futhark, and the five standard additional ones (á, æ, ý, io, ea). The listing order of the final two of the "elder" 24 runes is dæg, éðel. A peculiarity is the "asterisk" shape of eolh. The third line lists gar and kalc(?) before a doodling repetition of other runes.
The Old English and Old Frisian Runic Inscriptions database project at the Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany aims at collecting the genuine corpus of Old English inscriptions containing more than two runes in its paper edition, while the electronic edition aims at including both genuine and doubtful inscriptions down to single-rune inscriptions.
The corpus of the paper edition encompasses about one hundred objects (including stone slabs, stone crosses, bones, rings, brooches, weapons, urns, a writing tablet, tweezers, a sun-dial,[clarification needed] comb, bracteates, caskets, a font, dishes, and graffiti). The database includes, in addition, 16 inscriptions containing a single rune, several runic coins, and 8 cases of dubious runic characters (runelike signs, possible Latin characters, weathered characters). Comprising fewer than 200 inscriptions, the corpus is slightly larger than that of Continental Elder Futhark (about 80 inscriptions, c. 400–700), but slightly smaller than that of the Scandinavian Elder Futhark (about 260 inscriptions, c. 200–800).
Runic finds in England cluster along the east coast with a few finds scattered further inland in Southern England. Frisian finds cluster in West Frisia. Looijenga (1997) lists 23 English (including two 7th-century Christian inscriptions) and 21 Frisian inscriptions predating the 9th century.
Currently known inscriptions in Anglo-Frisian runes include:
- Ferwerd combcase, 6th century; me uræ
- Amay comb, c. 600; eda
- Oostyn comb, 8th century; aib ka[m]bu / deda habuku (with a triple-barred h)
- Toornwerd comb, 8th century; kabu
- Skanomody solidus, 575–610; skanomodu
- Harlingen solidus, 575–625, hada (two ac runes, double-barred h)
- Schweindorf solidus, 575–625, wela[n]du "Weyland" (or þeladu; running right to left)
- Folkestone tremissis, c. 650; æniwulufu
- Midlum sceat, c. 750; æpa
- Rasquert swordhandle (whalebone handle of a symbolic sword), late 8th century; ek [u]mædit oka, "I, Oka, not made mad" (compare ek unwodz from the Danish corpus)
- Arum sword, a yew-wood miniature sword, late 8th century; edæboda
- Westeremden A, a yew weaving-slay; adujislume[þ]jisuhidu
- Westeremden B, a yew-stick, 8th century; oph?nmuji?adaamluþ / :wimœ?ahþu?? / iwio?u?du?ale
- Britsum yew-stick; þkniaberetdud / ]n:bsrsdnu; the k has Younger Futhark shape and probably represents a vowel.
- Hantum whalebone plate; [.]:aha:k[; the reverse side is inscribed with Roman ABA.
- Bernsterburen whalebone staff, c. 800; tuda æwudu kius þu tuda
- Hamwic horse knucklebone, dated to between 650 and 1025; katæ (categorised as Frisian on linguistic grounds, from *kautōn "knucklebone")
- Wijnaldum B gold pendant, c. 600; hiwi
- Kantens combcase, early 5th century; li
- Hoogebeintum comb, c. 700; […]nlu / ded
- Wijnaldum A antler piece; zwfuwizw[…]
- Ash Gilton (Kent) gilt silver sword pommel, 6th century; […]emsigimer[…]
- Chessel Down I (Isle of Wight), 6th century; […]bwseeekkkaaa
- Chessel Down II (Isle of Wight) silver plate (attached to the scabbard mouthpiece of a ring-sword), early 6th century; æko:?ori
- Boarley (Kent) copper disc-brooch, c. 600; ærsil
- Harford (Norfolk) brooch, c. 650; luda:gibœtæsigilæ "Luda repaired the brooch"
- West Heslerton (North Yorkshire) copper cruciform brooch, early 6th century; neim
- Loveden Hill (Lincolnshire) urn; 5th to 6th century; reading uncertain, maybe sïþæbæd þiuw hlaw "the grave of Siþæbæd the maid"
- Spong Hill (Norfolk), three cremation urns, 5th century; decorated with identical runic stamps, reading alu (in Spiegelrunen).
- Kent II coins (some 30 items), 7th century; reading pada
- Kent III, IV silver sceattas, c. 600; reading æpa and epa
- Suffolk gold shillings (three items), c. 660; stamped with desaiona
- Caistor-by-Norwich astragalus, 5th century; possibly a Scandinavian import, in Elder Futhark transliteration reading raïhan "roe"
- Watchfield (Oxfordshire) copper fittings, 6th century; Elder Futhark reading hariboki:wusa (with a probably already fronted to æ)
- Wakerley (Northamptonshire) copper brooch, 6th century; buhui
- Dover (Kent) brooch, c. 600; þd bli / bkk
- Upper Thames Valley gold coins (four items), 620s; benu:tigoii; benu:+:tidi
- Willoughby-on-the-Wolds (Nottinghamshire) copper bowl, c. 600; a
- Cleatham (South Humbershire) copper bowl, c. 600; […]edih
- Sandwich/Richborough (Kent) stone, 650 or earlier; […]ahabu[…]i, perhaps *ræhæbul "stag"
- Whitby I (Yorkshire) jet spindle whorl; ueu
- Selsey (West Sussex) gold plates, 6th to 8th centuries; brnrn / anmu
- St. Cuthbert's coffin (Durham), dated to 698
- Whitby II (Yorkshire) bone comb, 7th century; [dæ]us mæus godaluwalu dohelipæ cy[ i.e. deus meus, god aluwaldo, helpæ Cy… "my god, almighty god, help Cy…" (Cynewulf or a similar personal name; compare also names of God in Old English poetry.)
- the Franks casket; 7th century
- zoomorphic silver-gilt knife mount, discovered in the River Thames near Westminster Bridge (late 8th century)
- the Ruthwell Cross; 8th century, the inscription may be partly a modern reconstruction
- the Brandon antler piece, wohs wildum deoræ an "[this] grew on a wild animal"; 9th century.
- Kingmoor Ring
- the Seax of Beagnoth; 9th century (also known as the Thames scramasax); the only complete alphabet
Related manuscript texts
- Codex Vindobonensis 795 (9th century)
- the Anglo-Saxon rune poem (Cotton Otho B.x.165)
- Solomon and Saturn (Nowell Codex)
|Part of a series on|
- "THE ANGLO-SAXON RUNES". arild-hauge.com.
- Page, Raymond Ian (1989), "Roman and Runic on St Cuthbert's Coffin", in Bonner, Gerald; Rollason, David; Stancliffe, Clare, St. Cuthbert, his Cult and his Community to AD 1200, Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer, pp. 257–63, ISBN 978-0-85115-610-1.
- "Texts and Contexts of the Oldest Runic Inscriptions". google.be.
- Flickr (photograms), Yahoo!
- "Silver knife mount with runic inscription", British Museum.
- Page, Raymond Ian (1999), An introduction to English runes (2nd ed.), Woodbridge: Boydell, p. 182.
- Bammesberger, Alfred (2002), "The Brandon Antler Runic Inscription", Neophilologus, Ingenta connect, 86: 129–31.
- Bammesberger, A, ed. (1991), "Old English Runes and their Continental Background", Anglistische Forschungen, Heidelberg, 217.
- ——— (2006), "Das Futhark und seine Weiterentwicklung in der anglo-friesischen Überlieferung", in Bammesberger, A; Waxenberger, Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 171–87, ISBN 3-11-019008-7.
- Hines, J (1990), "The Runic Inscriptions of Early Anglo-Saxon England", in Bammesberger, A, Britain 400–600: Language and History, Heidelberg, pp. 437–56.
- J. H. Looijenga, Runes around the North Sea and on the Continent AD 150–700, dissertation, Groningen University (1997).
- Odenstedt, Bengt, On the Origin and Early History of the Runic Script, Uppsala (1990), ISBN 91-85352-20-9; chapter 20: 'The position of continental and Anglo-Frisian runic forms in the history of the older futhark '
- Page, Raymond Ian (1999). An Introduction to English Runes. Woodbridge: Boydell Press. ISBN 0-85115-768-8.
- Robinson, Orrin W (1992). Old English and its Closest Relatives: A Survey of the Earliest Germanic Languages. Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1454-1.
- Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45 (1996).
- H. Marquardt, Die Runeninschriften der Britischen Inseln (Bibliographie der Runeninschriften nach Fundorten, Bd. I), Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Phil.-hist. Klasse, dritte Folge, Nr. 48, Göttingen 1961, pp. 10–16.
- Looijenga, Tineke (September 2003). Texts & Contexts of the Oldest Runic Inscriptions (Northern World, 4). Brill. ISBN 978-9004123960.