Jump to content

User talk:Hipposcrashed

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Hipposcrashed, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Christie bartram, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Non-Dropframe talk 02:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christie bartram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Non-Dropframe talk 02:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Christie bartram

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, thank you for taking the time to create a page here. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you created yourself. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the deletion tag you removed from Christie bartram. Please do not continue to remove the deletion tag, instead, if you disagree with the deletion, you can follow these steps:

  1. Go to the page by clicking this link. Once there, select the button that says Click here to contest this speedy deletion.
  2. This will take you to the talk page, where you can make your case by explaining why the page does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do. For further help about the deletion, you could contact the user who first placed the tag or a highly active user who is willingly to help with deletion. This message was left by a bot, so please do not contact the bot about the deletion. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:23, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christie bartram requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. StewartNetAddict (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Christie bartram

[edit]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Christie bartram. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 04:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Miss Chinese International Pageant 2001 has been reverted.
Your edit here to Miss Chinese International Pageant 2001 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://misshongkongpageant.tripod.com/chinese2001.htm%20Johnny's%20Pageant%20Page%20-%20Miss%20Chinese%20International%20Pageant%202001) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Chinese Montreal Pageant

[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Miss Chinese Montreal Pageant, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012 II

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Next Great Baker. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. azumanga (talk) 04:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Leisure Talk, you may be blocked from editing. azumanga (talk) 04:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Miss Chinese Toronto Pageant, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. By simply adding the Fairchild TV website as your reference does not necessarily mean that it is a reliable source. Please follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources to properly cite your edits. This goes for edits on other pages you have contributed as well including, but not limited to Miss Chinese (Vancouver) Pageant, Miss Chinese International Pageant and its corresponding pageants, Fairchild TV and its programming pages, etc. The section on Crown Design on Miss Chinese Toronto Pageant is now reverted. If you have proper citation, please feel free to edit the article again. If you need further help on proper citation, add {{Help me}} to this page and a senior editor will come to your rescue. Happy editing! Music + Pageants (talk) 08:35, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pacific Mall, you may be blocked from editing. Owen× 17:39, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Miss Chinese (Vancouver) Pageant, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Music + Pageants (talk) 07:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Christine Kuo.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 02:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Christine Kuo.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Christine Kuo.jpeg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:01, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Christine Kuo.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Making Subsections

[edit]

Hello there! Just a quick note as I was coming across your edits... When making subsections in articles, instead of using just one equal sign on either side of the title, please use two. (Eg: ==Subheader One==) Thank you. Happy editing! Music + Pageants (talk) 08:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Ontario Band Association, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb -MeMyEarsMyMouth- timed 03:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012 II

[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Miss Hong Kong Pageant, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding unsourced trivia notes to articles such as the phrase "It should be noted that Hong Kong often has a friendly streak, winning Miss Friendship consecutively for a few years in MCI, and Miss International." as well as the Pageant Records section that you inserted into the aforementioned article. You have been previously warned three times within this month about this matter. Please cease and desist in adding original researched trivia into articles. If you have any questions about Wikipedia's policy on Trivia articles, please check Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections for more details. Thank you. Music + Pageants (talk) 08:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Nadia Lun. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please note that personal blogs such as the one you listed as a citation at Nadia Lun and Candy Chang [1] is not considered a reliable source and has been deleted. Please see WP:BLOGS for more details. Thank you. Music + Pageants (talk) 08:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Suet Nei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Only You, Some Day, Phoenix Rising and Happy Ever After

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cilla Kung has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Suet Nei has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chow Chung has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 05:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Four (TV series). When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 05:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Suet Nei. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:45, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Chow Chung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Point Of No Return
Cilla Kung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to The Four

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research / Trivia Sections

[edit]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Lee Heung-kam. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Please remember to properly cite your edits, especially trivia points which point to original research. I do not mean to play police and watch and revert your edits all the time, but most of the articles you edit are just on my watchlist. I also don't mean to sound like a broken record, reminding you almost daily of this, but it's just following Wikipedia standards. And please read up on WP:NOTRIVIA and stop inserting "Trivia", "Notes" or "Records" sections into articles. They will most certainly be removed. It is hard enough having tons of existing Trivia sections to clean up. We do not need extra ones. Anyways, I do see some improvement on a few of your recent edits in regards to referencing and citation so continue on that path! Happy editing! Music + Pageants (talk) 11:07, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012 IV

[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Hong Kong Pageant. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Please do not add personal blogs to articles as external links. Thank you. Music + Pageants (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Miss Chinese Toronto Pageant. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Once again, you made 7 edits to the article without a single citation. Please remember to cite what you added to avoid reverts to your contributions. Thank you. Music + Pageants (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Miss China Europe Pageant, you may be blocked from editing. Music + Pageants (talk) 07:05, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Miss Chinese Toronto Pageant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Ma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Miss Chinese Toronto Pageant, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been warned many times and even blocked once because of such. Please cease and desist with your continual additions of random unsourced and originally researched trivia items into articles immediately and contribute positively to Wikipedia by adding only sourced material. Thank you. Music + Pageants (talk) 20:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When providing references and citations, it is important to cite properly. Your recent citations at Miss Chinese Toronto Pageant were too vague and do not provide enough description. Please note that by simply stating "Official Website", it is not enough to identify how your references are relevant to the information in the article. Please look at Help:Footnotes to properly cite your references and fix your citations. Otherwise, they may be callenged and removed as per Wikipedia:Citing sources. Thank you. Music + Pageants (talk) 10:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Miss Chinese International Pageant 1998. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Music + Pageants (talk) 10:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Don Li

[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Music + Pageants's talk page.

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Casper Chan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Four (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lily Leung has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Scopecreep (talk) 05:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lily Leung (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to ATV and Not Just A Pretty Face
King Kong Lam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Man's Best Friend

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alex Lam has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 05:05, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cecilia Wang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheLongTone (talk) 06:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carl Ng. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 10:58, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Carl Ng, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 10:59, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012 II

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Candy Chang. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have undid my editing out of "Chang is noted by viewers as Bernice Liu's possible successor as they have many similarities, although Chang speaks Cantonese more fluently than Liu.She is also 10 years younger than Liu." in the aforementioned article. Statements like these, espeically unsourced ones, are trivia that belongs in fansites and not on Wikipedia. Please refrain from adding unsourced trivia on Wikipedia; it is not the place to boast a celebrity's resume or "starpower". I have been REPEATEDLY reminding you since February to stop adding original research and trivia on Wikipedia. Please consider following WP:NOTRIVIA when editing from now on as you may be blocked from editing again for future offenses. Music + Pageants (talk) 09:47, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on King Kong Li requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Seduisant (talk) 02:33, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Shit. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The section you added on Asia's media usage of the term is completely unsourced and is original research. Please do not continually add unsourced statements to articles. Music + Pageants (talk) 01:30, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Chinese Toronto Pageant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sherry Chen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miss Hong Kong Pageant has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 22:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miss Miss Hong Kong Pageant has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NSH002 (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Longhua (collar)) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Longhua (collar), Hipposcrashed!

Wikipedia editor LukeSurl just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A good start! Please expand with additional sources. A picture would be great!

To reply, leave a comment on LukeSurl's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello there, just a heads up that the current disambiguation policy states:

"Disambiguation is required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might search, there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead." (emphasis mine)

Please do not recreate the page without first establishing a page for the second meaning and showing that the links to the current page are, in fact, ambiguous.

Thanks. Sasquatch t|c 23:39, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo's of Danish Royals

[edit]

Could you please confirm these are actually Creative Commons, by linking to a page with the relevant permission on it?

Editorial use only does not automatically mean Creative Commons.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:16, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is quite safe to assume that they are not. Judging by this talk page, you should not expect an answer. I have removed them from every article they were added to. Someone should delete them as soon as possible. Surtsicna (talk) 09:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just deleted all of these images. Please note that you can only claim a creative commons licence if the same license is stated by the copyright holder. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zara Phillips may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zara Phillips may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peter Phillips may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Prince Sverre Magnus of Norway may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |28= 28. Johannes Samuelson Tjessem <ref>{{cite web|title=Sverre Johannesson Tjessem (1899 - 1966|url=http://www.geni.com/people/Sverre-Tjessem/6000000001827551168|accessdate=24 May
  • |29= 29. Elisebet Tollaksen Mysse <ref>{{cite web|title=Sverre Johannesson Tjessem (1899 - 1966|url=http://www.geni.com/people/Sverre-Tjessem/6000000001827551168|accessdate=24 May

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:45, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Royal Family Orders of Sweden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An unofficial, unannounced order, in an unsourced article. No evidence that this is a notable subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Royal Family Orders of Sweden for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royal Family Orders of Sweden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Family Orders of Sweden until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 06:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Family Orders of Sweden. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. –Davey2010(talk) 01:43, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits to Letizia of Spain appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Origamite\(·_·\)(/·_·)/ 12:34, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Leonor, Princess of Asturias may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *(The coat of arms used as princess was the whole differenced with a label of three points Azure (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:44, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CoA of Queen Sonja

[edit]

Thanks. No More 18 (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 5 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Princess Märtha Louise of Norway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lisa Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 27 September

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:18, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Consorts

[edit]

Could you please remove the duplication of "born" if you replace nee on further articles? Thanks. DrKiernan (talk) 15:58, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ARMS.PNG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ARMS.PNG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wedding of Pavlos, Crown Prince of Greece, and Marie-Chantal Miller photo.PNG

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wedding of Pavlos, Crown Prince of Greece, and Marie-Chantal Miller photo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DrKiernan (talk) 07:33, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wedding of Guillaume, Hereditary Grand Duke of Luxembourg, and Countess Stéphanie de Lannoy.PNG

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wedding of Guillaume, Hereditary Grand Duke of Luxembourg, and Countess Stéphanie de Lannoy.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. DrKiernan (talk) 09:32, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image problem at Elizabeth II

[edit]

There's a systemic problem somewhere: see Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 131#Image problem. DrKiernan (talk) 21:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Knights of the Order of the Seraphim may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:34, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Really?

[edit]

Your move to Wedding of Victoria, Crown Princess of Sweden and Daniel Westling‎, made Victoria the princess of "Sweden and Daniel ...", - I don't think that's what you mean. Consider to revert yourself, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wedding of Frederik, Crown Prince of Denmark, and Mary Donaldson.PNG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wedding of Frederik, Crown Prince of Denmark, and Mary Donaldson.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 21:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Arms

[edit]

Hi. I saw your wonderful work on Sarah, Duchess of York's coat of arms. Because of that I want to give you some requests for making more coat of arms:

Of course all of these are requests and I can't force you to do them. But please do them every time you can. It will be wonderful. Thank you so much. Keivan.fTalk 06:17, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Right now, I don't have the time to do these (these things take hours and even days). But when I have the time, which will probably be in a really long time, I will.--Hipposcrashed (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. But please create them whenever you have time. I'll wait to see these coat of arms made by you in the future. Keivan.fTalk 14:42, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also I wanted to tell you something. When I searched in internet I found some versions of Sarah's arms that have motto: "EX ADVERSIS FELICITAS CRESCIT". This sentence is also written in her article on Wikipedia. If it is true then it should be written under her coat of arms during her marriage, like Diana, Princess of Wales or Sophie, Countess of Wessex. Please find out what's the real version of her coat of arms. With motto or without motto. Keivan.fTalk 16:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At last please create the shield of arms of Sarah, Duchess of York. Like the shield of arms of Diana, Princess of Wales and other members of the royal family that you can see an example of it here. Keivan.fTalk 17:42, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the text. Unfortunately there is a rendering issue that I am not familiar with so the text is not displayed properly. I have restored it to the original.--Hipposcrashed (talk) 02:49, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Finally you added the text. Thanks a lot. But I think you should remove that grass from the coat of arms. Like the arms of Diana, Princess of Wales and Sophie, Countess of Wessex. Keivan.fTalk 08:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics Lab (request 11.13.2014)

[edit]
Hello, Hipposcrashed. Greetings from the Photography workshop. A reply has been made to your request. You may view the reply here.
If you are satisfied, please copy/paste the following code and add it to your request: {{resolved|1=~~~~}}

   --Victor•talk 19:07, 21 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]


You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Photography reply}} template.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Day of Monaco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Nicholas Cathedral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pronouns in article and business titles

[edit]

Is there any reason you are renaming official titles such as chairman to chairperson, as well as moving businesspeople articles? If the company uses the title chairman for their presiding officer, then that is what it should be used.--Tærkast (Discuss) 20:29, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TaerkastUA: I query these edits too. Hipposcrashed, you did the same at École Polytechnique massacre, here, changing "His father, a mutual funds salesman ..." to salesperson. Additionally, you did not provide an edit summary to explain why. As the person was male than it is quite proper to call them a salesman. If there is a policy that discusses, allows or promotes these changes please link to it. As it is, these edits seem rather NON-NPOV. --220 of Borg 11:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princess Lilian, Duchess of Halland.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Lilian, Duchess of Halland.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:03, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

[edit]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Hi there.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220 of Borg 11:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Why don't you join WikiProject Microsoft?

It seems that you have been editing Microsoft-related articles, so why don't you consider joining WikiProject Microsoft, not to be confused with WikiProject Microsoft Windows. WikiProject Microsoft is a group of editors who are willing to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Microsoft, its technologies, Web-based sites and applications, its important people, and share interests regarding Microsoft. This WikiProject is in the process of being revived and is welcoming any and all editors who are willing to help out with the process. Add your name to the list at Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Participants and/or add the userbox {{User WikiProject Microsoft}}. Thanks! STJMLCC (talk) 17:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Mumford, 15th Lady Herries of Terregles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suo Jure

[edit]

FWIW, both Lady Wentworth and Lady Anne Blunt held the Wentworth title in their own right, not by marriage. I don't know if that makes any difference in the edits and categories you added/removed there, but thought I'd let you know. (I'm mostly interested in their work as horse breeders, I'm not up on Peerage stuff). I'm all for gender neutral language when possible, so I'm OK with your changes, just wasn't sure from your edit summary if you knew they held the titles suo jure... Montanabw(talk) 05:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese Imperial Family

[edit]

Hi. Did you give a move request for changing the titles? I understood recently that the titles have been changed. I gave a message to that administrator but he doesn't seem to be online. I think a move request should be given. What do you think? Keivan.fTalk 19:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I left a message on DrKiernan's talk page. Please visit the page and tell your opinion about moving the articles. Keivan.fTalk 16:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I gave a move request on Prince Akishino's talk page. You can participate in the discussion if you like. Keivan.fTalk 15:01, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please check my refs for both Lupton family page and Roger Lupton page Thanks Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.105.232 (talk) 07:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great work you're doing - thank you! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For consistency, please do the singles, such as Jämtland, also. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanx! I did this just now because the current king is not still Duke of Jämtland, as far as I know. Have you ever seen a source that says he is? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanking you again for all the good work you did, I have now brought the charts you created into line for consistency, made some corrections (mainly where you missed things when you copied & pasted) and added clarifications. Hope you like how great the whole thing looks, mainly thanx to your efforts. Now, whould you like to apply your listing skills to Finland too? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Camilla (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camillo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Style (manner of address) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *His/Her [[Ducal Serene Highness]] (abbreviation ''HDSH'', oral address, ''Your Ducal Serene Highness'' – members of some Ducal houses.
  • on a [[Danish passport|Danish diplomatic passport]] by the name ''Constantino de Grecia'' ([[Spanish language|Spanish]] for "Constantine of Greece".

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste move

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Lalla Salma, Princess Consort of Morocco a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Princess Lalla Salma of Morocco. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Nacho (Talk page)15:31, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:S-official

[edit]

Template:S-official has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Reach Out to the Truth 14:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Rare Chinese Characters

[edit]

𠊎㑚儂侬

Replaceable fair use File:Throne norway.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Throne norway.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:35, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Swedish family order carl gustav.JPG

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Swedish family order carl gustav.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lady in Red.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lady in Red.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Royal family orders has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Royal family orders, which you created, has been nominated for upmerging to Category:Orders, decorations, and medals. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Queen Máxima of the Netherlands may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[File:1977 Máxima Zorreguieta.jpg|left|thumb]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:38, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your addition of File:Crown Prince Akihito and Crown Princess Michiko with three children; Prince Naruhito, Prince Fumihito and Princess Sayako. (September 1969).jpg to Naruhito, Crown Prince of Japan because the image cluttered up the section to which it was added. There is already another image of him in that section, and there is not really room for more. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:12, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Finger food, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chuan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Hipposcrashed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improving images

[edit]

Hi Hipposcrashed. Would you please improve the quality of this new image of the Japanese princess Mako? I thought as you had done the same thing for the rest of the images in the past you might be the best choice in order to do it again. Thanks. Keivan.fTalk 07:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Emblem of Queen Jetsun Pema of Bhutan.PNG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Emblem of Queen Jetsun Pema of Bhutan.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Microcalligraphy (Chinese).jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Microcalligraphy (Chinese).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bhutanese Title

[edit]

Template:Bhutanese Title has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:33, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Hipposcrashed. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of Robert Watt (2007-).PNG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Robert Watt (2007-).PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wedding of Charles, Prince of Wales, and Camilla Parker Bowles photo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Signature of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.PNG listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Signature of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 06:37, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miss Asia Pageant (ATV)Logo.JPG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miss Asia Pageant (ATV)Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Deborah Moore (presenter) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Fails WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 06:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh photo.PNG

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh photo.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:13, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Hipposcrashed. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wedding of Charles, Prince of Wales, and Lady Diana Spencer photo.PNG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wedding of Charles, Prince of Wales, and Lady Diana Spencer photo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Cici Chen. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 15:08, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh photo.PNG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh photo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Frontman830 (talk) 00:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh photo.PNG listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh photo.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Frontman830 (talk) 22:29, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh photo.PNG

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wedding of Princess Elizabeth and Philip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh photo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion for First Lady of Sri Lanka

[edit]
Notice

The article First Lady of Sri Lanka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:HOAX Article. Fails WP:RELIABLE. The sources present doesn't atleast himt about a title called "the first lady" while also being non relevant to the article. The origin section states the origin of the office of the president; no proof or statement about the origin of the "first lady" title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MihirNak007 (talk) 21:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Estelle Order of the Seraphim.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, unnecessary crop. No obvious use. Replaceable with File:Royal 8040 (7251519856).jpg and files at c:Category:Badges of the Order of the Seraphim.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]