User talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao/Archive 44

The Midnight Hour 1985 Movie[edit]

Hello and good day - I made a minor change on the article about the 1985 made for TV movie The Midnight Hour. The plot states "It is Halloween in the small town of Pitchford Cove located somewhere in New England" not giving any specific state. In the movie, approximately at the 27 minute 43 second time marker there is a quick shot of the back of Phil Grenville's car, showing the license plate number "713 ZKH" and what appears to say "Massachusetts" on top of it. So I amended the plot to say "...the small town of Pitchford Cove, Massachusetts..." please advise if this is okay (here at your discussion page) if not, please let me know. Thanks, btw for all of your contributions at Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.162.60 (talk) 03:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Lucia (please add to 2022 monkeypox outbreak)[edit]

Hello, I had messaged you the other day. But this time it is for a recommendation, Could you please add Saint Lucia to the confirmed countries. Also here is the source proveing it. (MagneticMediaTV) 73.126.133.15 (talk) 15:56, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion[edit]

Hello friend. I hear you're good with categories so was wondering if I could ask a second opinion. Mainly so I can learn. 1) I saw this on my watchlist. Just wondering if it's correct to put a mountain in a category such as Mountaineering deaths or Mountaineering disasters? There's a paragraph about this in the article but doesn't seem like a perfect fit. 2) A visit to Category:Mountaineering_deaths shows some articles sorting under space and *, should their sortkeys be deleted so that they sort normally? 3) Same category, I see a lot of people peppered in. Should this category only include articles specifically about mountaineering deaths, e.g. "Death of X" or "Y accident" instead of articles on specific people? Thanks for your time. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Novem Linguae: Apologies - I've been perambulating all day, and have just now returned home for the evening. To answer your questions.

1) I don't think it's correct to put a mountain in such a category, no. (Possibly "Mountaneering disasters", but only if the incident in question occupies a substantial part of the article text, and even then I think it's iffy.)

2) No need to re-sort; I think everything in the category looks fine as is.
3) No - it's fine as is, I think. "Mountaneering deaths" can be seen as a subset of "deaths by cause", same as "deaths from cancer" or "deaths from pneumonia". And we don't require an article to be about someone's death only to fit in the latter categories.

Hope this is of use to you - happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:47, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick, friendly, expert advice. Much appreciated :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 22:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Albio Sires[edit]

Hello, why did you remove the categories Category:Democratic Party members of the United States House of Representatives, Category:Members of the United States House of Representatives from New Jersey, Category:New Jersey Democrats from Albio Sires?. I'm curious what your reasoning is. I feel they shouldn't have been removed, but I'm open to other opinions. Acebarry (talk) 14:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Acebarry: They have all been collapsed into Category:Democratic Party members of the United States House of Representatives from New Jersey - per Wikipedia:Categorization, there's no need for him to be in all four. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ser Amantio di Nicolao 2001:FB1:119:830A:A807:95FB:4DD7:7ABC (talk) 20:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simonet[edit]

Hello. I have tried to link languages https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simonet and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simonet but I cannot do it, can you do it please? Thank you. 85.60.107.175 (talk) 02:18, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Animated comedy films?[edit]

Hi Ser, thanks for your work to remove the country categories for film articles per the recent discussion. Did you mean to also remove the above category from a number of films? I don't recall seeing a conversation to that effect. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 18:36, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: They were in a by-nationality subcat, so I assumed they should be diffused - unless I've forgotten something, I thought that was the way it was supposed to go. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:43, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The category you removed in a few cases was Category:Animated comedy films, which doesn't appear to be in a by-nationality subcat? See [1], [2], [3] as examples. DonIago (talk) 18:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: They should have been in Category:American animated comedy films, no? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I gotcha now. I thought you were making edits akin to removing the "master" country categories (which most of your edits were at a glance); I didn't realize you were removing that category because the articles in question were already in subcats. Thanks for clarifying! DonIago (talk) 19:01, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: Any time. Thanks for the question - honestly I've been doing so much my head was beginning to spin a bit, so it's nice to have a pause. :-) Happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Related: Could you include a link to the discussion deprecating the practice in your edit summaries? It'd be much more convenient to other editors who weren't following it. I couldn't find it myself, and only saw that Bearcat recently edited WP:MOSFILM to say so. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:10, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul 012: Sure - I can do that. I wasn't aware of a particular discussion myself; I just happened to see it in the edit summaries of the categories, also. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 11:58, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pedro Rebolledo (composer)[edit]

The article Pedro Rebolledo (composer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article lacks sources in all language versions

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Indian films[edit]

Hello @Ser Amantio di Nicolao I hope you're good. I came across your edit where you removed the category (I did check you the link in edit summary but it was an bouncer for me). If not Indian films then what should we include as a replacement. Thanks, stay safe C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:58, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@C1K98V: Is this the link you tried? Seems to be working for me. Regardless: it basically says that having all films in the by-country categories is no longer necessary due to their size. As long as the article is in a subcategory of the parent (as these are in various subcategories of Category:Indian films by language, there's no need to replace the category with anything once it's been removed. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:01, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the relevant quote from the linked page:

Please note that WikiProject Film formerly maintained a consensus of requiring base "Country films" (e.g. Category:American films) to be "all-inclusive" — that is, in order that the base category served as a complete and thorough directory of all films from that country, a film had to be filed there even if it was already in one or more "Country-genre" or "Country-other characteristic" subcategories. However, this is no longer established practice; due to the extreme size that some countries' categories attained, that practice has been deprecated. A film should still be filed directly in the appropriate "Country films" category if its genre is uncertain and/or the appropriate "Country-genre" intersection category does not yet exist, but should no longer be filed there simultaneously with other subcategories within the same country's tree.

--Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ser Amantio di Nicolao okay got it. Thanks C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 06:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing articles[edit]

Dear Ser is it OK if you help out to fix a couple of articles? Guroghviono (talk) 02:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you change the 2010s to present content on the history section of the horror film article into a 2010s content for now? Guroghviono (talk) 02:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And for the history of horror films article can change the 2010s–present section into a 2010s section for now? Guroghviono (talk) 03:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you split 2010s and 2020s for the horror film article next? Guroghviono (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Guroghviono: No - that would leave "2020s" with only a sentence of information. Better to wait until there's more material. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK or you could just remove 2020s for now and I thank you for splitting the 2010s and 2020s for the history of horror films article. Guroghviono (talk) 05:00, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Guroghviono: I'm not going to change the article. I don't feel that it needs changing. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe later? Guroghviono (talk) 05:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Guroghviono: I'm not interested in changing the article. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:04, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Guroghviono (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I wasted your time. Guroghviono (talk) 05:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that Guroghviono is banned user Jinnifer. Strongly recommend deleting entire thread as per WP:DENY--Mr Fink (talk) 05:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Apokryltaros: Personally, I prefer to leave it. I don't like to delete anything from my talkpage (unless there are legal considerations). Maybe I'm peculiar that way, but...well, I'm peculiar in a lot of ways. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Apokryltaros: Blocked for sockpuppetry. (And for playing me for a fool, but that's beside the point.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Everyone is strange, like how Echo and the Bunnymen once opined, and thank you for the help. Their nonsense on my page pretty much confirmed their identity for me.--Mr Fink (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Apokryltaros: Honestly, I'm a teensy bit uncomfortable having done it without a CheckUser, but I trust the judgment of enough of the people involved that I think it was warranted, especially as the individual in question was currently active. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:37, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Film cats[edit]

Hi SADN - hope you are well! Just a note that removing the language categories on film articles such as this don't really do anything, as the language category is also hard-coded from the infobox too. Maybe un-hardcoding it should be done. If there is such a word. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts: I know that's the case for some...I think I've encountered a few, though, where it's not hard-coded (I can't remember which ones, but offhand I know I saw at least two yesterday). To your second point: I think un-hardcoding it isn't a bad idea, but I think that may be something for a little further down the line when we think about getting unwieldy categories under control. The hardcoding has always bugged me a bit - I get its point, but it makes it difficult to pare down unwieldy categories, and I think it might be time to give that some thought. Having said which...I'm going to be going out of town in a couple of days, so it may be something for me to chew over on my return. Or maybe earlier...I do have a laptop, after all... --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:26, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No probs - just so you're aware! Yeah, could well be worth flagging it up at WT:FILM and getting the infobox changed. Enjoy your days out of town. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:33, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts: Looking forward to it - I really need the break. Thanks for the tip. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:35, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can we also do the same for Category:Silent films? Scorpions13256 (talk) 22:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scorpions13256: Personally, I see no reason why not, but I defer to Lugnuts and his longer experience with film categories and articles. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:57, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would be fine by me, Scorps, but best drop a note at WT:FILM first to see what others think. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts:, Scorpions13256 - that goes without saying, to me. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 11:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like there's a movement afoot! Please see Template_talk:Infobox_film#Redundancy_in_categories_added_by_template. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 13:22, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lugnuts: Thanks for the pin tip - I've replied. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:42, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello sir amantio could you please send me your e-mail there is a painting of Maurice logan i will be needing your help Regards sir 154.143.16.154 (talk) 13:39, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@154.143.16.154: You may use the email link on this page to contact me. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:44, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit count[edit]

Hi. Did you calculate this, or what? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: Sort of. I wanted 5 million to be something special, and as it happened I didn't get to start creating the article until close to midnight (I had chores last night, for one thing.) Didn't quite intend for it to happen that way, but it did. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:40, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw the update on WP:RECORDS. Congrats! jp×g 18:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JPxG: Thanks. Ended up working out quite nicely. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:02, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robertson Nunatak for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robertson Nunatak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robertson Nunatak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User:Jonwilliamsl(talk|contribs) 13:25, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Bader Al Shebani[edit]

Hi Ser, This article was previously proposed for deletion for a variety of reasons, including notability and unambiguous advertising.he is a Saudi mountain climber, entrepreneur and author of two books with good coverage by the media (TV, radio, and newspapers), I guess this is enough as notability evidence, but for promotion accusation, we're from different countries and I don't see any evidence for advertising. I just read about him and tried to create an article about him. I hope you can help me with this issue and to check the draft. If you see any problems, I'll respect your opinion. Thanks. Lanm-more (talk) 01:46, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lanm-more: I'm sorry, but I'm afraid I'm not the best person to ask. For one thing, I'm traveling, and won't likely have a chance to consider the article in detail until tomorrow evening at the earliest. For another, the fields involved (mountain climing and business) are really not the sorts of things I know. I would look for another editor...perhaps at WP:TEAHOUSE. Good luck to you, and sorry I cannot be of more help. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Film categories[edit]

Hi Steve, I know you're on holiday but perhaps you or Lugnuts could explain why Category:Argentine films and Category:American films etc has been dispersed from an A-Z and who decided this? I'm not going to find films in "Argentine romantic comedies" if I don't know what genre a film is in. Having an A-Z list of films by country was one of the most important assets to the film infrastructure on here I thought. If we've removed those categories (I can agree on the American category being too big to navigate), I think we should create lists in an A-Z for convenience. We need one place where all films from a given country are listed for quick access and convenience.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:31, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr B - please see this and this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sc2353 Category:Argentine historical comedy-drama films is definitely overkill with categorization. Bearcat and Erik who were involved with approving this, did you not think if we were going to get rid of the categories then we should at least move them to a useful A-Z list by country in the article space? We are now left with articles in the main category which don't yet have genre mentioned and they are the ones most likely to be undeveloped which people are going to see when looking in the main category for films of that country. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

65 genres of film to browse through now to find films?? It's fine if we have one sensible category to list them in too but not as a main page for navigation. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's not ideal, but I'm long past caring about changes like this. One of my fave recent films is the Brazilian film Bacurau. I could never recal the spelling, but knew it was in the parent category of Category:Brazilian films. I was looking for it the other day, and eventually found it in Category:Brazilian science fiction drama films! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:57, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your concerns have to be balanced against the size of the national film categories, because category size is an issue we have to take into account as well.

For example, under all-included rules Category:American films had around 55,000 articles in it — a size that is not acceptable, not manageable and would have been deemed too large and in urgent need of diffusion in virtually any other category tree. This meant, for starters, that it was impossible to actually do any work in that category with WP:AWB, such as making sure that all the films in the genre categories even were being included in the main category in the first place, because AWB has a 25,000 article limit on batches which only got one to the letter I and left any title from J through Z completely unprocessable in AWB. For another thing, in the process of cleaning this up I have caught several dozen films that were in the American films category but didn't actually belong there because they weren't actually American-produced films at all, and only a cleanup attempt to diffuse the category would ever actually have caught such errors.

Category:Argentine films, similarly, had around 2,000 articles in it — and while that didn't rub up the against AWB batching issue, it was still too large for the category to actually be useful to a reader, and would still have been deemed "diffusion required" in virtually any other Wikipedia category tree. Category:Canadian films, Category:French films, Category:German films and Category:Italian films, similarly, were all on the other side of 5,000 films, Category:British films was on the other side of 10,000 films, and on and so forth. There is a point when a category is simply too large and needs to be subcategorized for management purposes, and that point is when the category is populated into the thousands.

Films, further, don't need a "one-stop A-Z category" more than TV shows, novels, albums or people do. Category:Television series by country categories have never been deemed "all-inclusive", such that the base category would need to comprise a comprehensive A-Z list of all television series from that country even if they're extensively subcategorized for genre and time period and originating network — and films don't have a special need for something that television series wouldn't also need. Category:Novels by country categories are not deemed "all-inclusive", and films don't have a special need for different treatment than that. And on and so forth: there's simply no pressing need for film categories to work differently than novels or television series or albums or politicians categories do: if virtually no other category tree in Wikipedia is deemed to require its base country category to function as a comprehensive "all-included" A-Z list of every Wikipedia article in the subcategories, then films simply don't need to be handled any differently than any other topic.

A-Z lists can certainly be created anytime somebody deigns to take on the job, and can still be compiled just as readily from the subcategories as they could from the main category, but that's not a job you get to force other people to do against their will. Bearcat (talk) 18:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the article says it's a western initially? Looks a good film, I'll have to check it out. The problem now even if we create A-Z lists most people who create the articles won't add them to the list so it'll quickly not become comprehensive. Was there really wide consensus on this involving all members of the FILM project? How many decided this Bearcat? Something of this importance to the infrastructure, all project members should be alerted and asked to participate in a discussion. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree on 55,000 being massive, but if there is an index table so editors can quickly go to S or Z etc, what was causing the problem? Most of the film lists like Lists of Argentine films now say "visit Category:Argentine films" for an A-Z list... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reread what I said about AWB batching being impossible if a category surpasses less than half of 55,000.

And again, why would films need special treatment that other similar categories aren't getting? Why do films need the base national categories to be all-inclusive A-Z lists if television series don't need that, and albums don't need that, and novels don't need that, and politicians don't need that, and actors don't need that, and musicians don't need that, and lawyers don't need that, and lakes don't need that, and rivers don't need that, and mountains don't need that, and on and so forth? Why would it be uniquely more necessary when it comes to films than it is for any other class of topic that isn't handled that way?

And just for the record, the discussion took place on the project talk page, and was open for more than long enough that anybody who cared enough to comment had ample opportunity to contribute their two cents to the discussion, so I'm not engaging in any debate or discussion about that. Bearcat (talk) 18:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Albums we typically go by artist and genre but I would argue that it would be very useful to have a big parent category or A-Z list by country of TV series too. We do have Categories for mountains, rivers and lakes etc by country, and I would argue that even if we split into regions one big A-Z category is great for navigation for those who want it. I have argued that Categories of settlements should try to list settlements in a comprehensive way too as Populated places in xx by area but the system has gone back to people creating village categories. OK, the American list was too large, agreed, but was there technically any real issue with the index for most of the categories including the Argentine one? When you have to browse through seven categories to find films in Category:Argentine thriller films alone, that's not useful IMO.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I do think an A-Z list in the article space would be better than a category, as they would be more visible on one (or a few pages in the larger list cases) page instead of scrolling through 200 each page, I argued that 15 years back and people said it was redundant because of the categories. The issue is that many editors will create articles and not know about the list. Coding a bot to add new entries to a list could technically be done but could also cause problems with films produced involving a lot of countries. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnuts and Bearcat: thanks very much for answering in my stead, and my apologies for being unavailable all day. (I've been crossing three states today, beginning in a fourth and ending in a sixth after lashings of a fifth, and I really should be abed by now.) I think you've stated the case better than I can. I will only add that it always troubled me, a bit, that the films-by-nationality categories were non-diffusing given their size; I think many of them, not just the ones listed above (I'm thinking French, for instance, and German, and Spanish as well) rapidly became too large to wade through comfortably. I think paring them down is much more helpful in the long run. That said...I do agree with Dr. Blofeld that some of the newer categories are a tad too narrow, and may want reconsidering. But I think that's an argument for another day, and I think the current system is, in the long run, an improvement over its predecessor. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 07:58, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Too big to wade through if you are browsing it in 200 per page, I agree. Some with a few thousand like the Argentine one with the index I think was still OK. I don't object to splitting by genre but I think there should be the option on here for editors to view all films from that country in an A-Z format. In terms of browsing I think we'd be much better off with lists than categories for this, but I wish I had known about this change as I would have said to copy the category to a list before you start splitting. Is there any way now to generate a list of films from all the sub categories? We should have an A-Z list of films by country if we no longer have categories.. Enjoy your break Steve, no Dominican Republic this year?.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:47, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps Erik can suggest a way in which we can create A-Z lists of films by country?♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Nope - Iowa and points west. (About to go to West Branch to visit Herbert Hoover.)

I would say: if you want a list of all films from a certain country, it's generally fairly easy to generate using a couple of the available tools. Shouldn't take too long if you want to work it up.

And I hear what you're saying, but to me 1,000 articles in a category is borderline problematic at best; if we have a category that large (and we do, quite a few) I think it's important to start thinking about how it can be broken up. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Well, I was thinking in terms of using the index feature to quickly go to a letter rather than scrolling through each page. I suppose if you have to scroll through over 5 pages it starts to get tedious and you have a point. If somebody could use one of the tools to create lists by country which can be put in the mainspace that would be a great help. As long as we have something which allows editors and readers to be able to view the films in one place.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:35, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: That's a possibilty, certainly, but I think those lists are going to have to be broken down alphabetically, at least for some of the larger countries. I don't see a list of 50,000+ items for American films, for instance, being viable. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What about something like Category:2010s Argentine films by decade? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: I seem to recall discussion of something of the sort, but perhaps my wits are woolgathering. I need to look into it further when I have a moment, but that's certainly one possibility.

I just asked at WP:Film. I think most countries would be doable by decade. Maybe not the US though. There'd be 12 or 13 decade categories typically for many countries, more or a bit less for others. Roseman Covered Bridge looks a nice place BTW, Madison County, Iowa. Clint and Meryl! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was drinking cider in Madison County last night. Didn't go looking for any of the bridges, though. I'm spending a couple of nights at the opera in Indianola. I'll take a look at the film discussion. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:29, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CATV[edit]

Regarding frequent and pervasive edits such as this one, I would kindly request that you check what facts are documented in the article and backed by reliable secondary sources. In this particular case, there was absolutely no mention of Zucker's heritage or religion in the article at all, so I'm bewildered as to how you decided to attach that category to him. Elizium23 (talk) 03:08, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Elizium23: He was listed in Category:Jewish American state legislators in Maryland, which is how he came to be in my list. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... yeah, I'd advise caution there, considering how I was able to decimate that category. Since Wikipedia is not a reliable source, we can't depend on existing categories to adhere to WP:CATV. Without existing material in the article to support them, categories should be removed rather than multiplied, IMHO. Elizium23 (talk) 04:38, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a tendency to assume good faith, as I've frequently seen the category supported by a piece of information that has since been deleted, leaving the category a stray. But I take your point, and I do try to catch stuff when I can. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:39, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chatting[edit]

Hey Ser Amantio di Nicolao how are you doing tonight? Quentbon Zemro (talk) 05:33, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do something for the horror film article since there's already a history of horror films article can you remove all the decade contents from its history section it'll make much more room on there same thing for the history section of the science fiction film article. Quentbon Zemro (talk) 05:37, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Quentbon Zemro: No. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:39, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the decade contents is taking up much room on the history sections of both articles that's why there's articles about their history. Quentbon Zemro (talk) 05:39, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have a better solution why don't you break the 2010s to present content into a 2010s content and a 2020s content for the history section of the horror film article just like what you did for the 2010s section and the 2020s section of the history of horror films article you've done it before. SantioSpawn (talk) 06:00, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SantioSpawn: I am not going to edit horror film articles. I will not do it. Stop pestering me. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2022[edit]

Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239

Online events:

New: Alphabet run: C and D | Indigenous women | Refugees | Comedians, Comics and other Performers
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

See also:

Interwiki Women Collaboration focus on UEFA Women's Euro 2022, August 8–21

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for your work <3 <3

Ahmed0112 (talk) 17:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmed0112: You're quite welcome. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 08:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Denamax 05.01 DENAMAX (talk) 03:01, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DENAMAX: You, too, are quite welcome. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:31, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trolls[edit]

Sorry! I did not mean to revert your edit on Trolls. I was trying to revert what looked like a vandal's edit immediately above yours. EEBuchanan (talk) 16:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@EEBuchanan: Perfectly alright - I've had plenty similar slips of the finger. No harm done. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:40, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WHY?![edit]

Why in the world would you write this???

'Saudagar uses Manjeet to get the diamonds himself in the climax. The diamonds turn out to be fake replicas planted by the Queen of England. So Saudagar exchanges them for a fart. Sanjay attacks Saudagar using a rocket launcher, but misses. The rocket hits Manjeet, who is wearing a bullet proof jacket. The police arrive in the end and arrest the dacoits. Manjeet thanks the lord for saving him and breaks into a love song.'

Don't disrespect a classic! Shame on you!!! R.D Burman's Reincarnation (talk) 08:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@R.D Burman's Reincarnation: I am unsure of what caused you to attribute this passage to Ser Amantio, but it did not originate with him. It was added last October by an IP user, who made no other edits. Elizium23 (talk) 08:59, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sorry I made mistake please forgive me. R.D Burman's Reincarnation (talk) 07:27, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a great movie. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:35, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ser Amantio[edit]

Enjoy your vacation! - I meant to send flowers to you when I saw Ser Amantio on stage, in 21st century-outfit ;) -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:45, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ps: 17 July, and Gianni Schicchi was world class, also in Il tabarro, and Giorgetta the same - had written her article a while ago. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: That's an awfully good cast. I've never actually seen Il tabarro or Suor Angelica live; both times I've seen Schicchi it was paired with something else.

Just got home after a nine-hour-plus drive from Indianapolis, so I'm headed to bed shortly. But I had a nice trip - three performances at Des Moines Metro Opera and two at Santa Fe Opera. My first time at both - I'll be back, definitely. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

that's good news, what did you see where? - I heard Andreas Scholl yesterday, in concert - article written with Eric Corbett (who changed his user name during the process) - those were the days --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: At Des Moines:

A Thousand Acres by Kristin Kuster and Mark Campbell - reasonable, as far as contemporary operas go. Don't see it having much of a future. Excellent cast.
A Midsummer Night's Dream by Benjamin Britten - my first exposure to the piece. An absolute delight. Again, excellent cast (keep an eye out for Tamara Gura, if you have the chance - a very fine contralto.)

American Apollo by Damian Geter and Lila Palmer - intriguing, has a lot of potential. I was quite taken with the short version. DMMO has commissioned an evening-length version for 2024 and I'm seriously considering attending.

At Santa Fe:

Falstaff - a disappointment. Rather pedestrian all around, to be honest; I wanted more from the performance.
M. Butterfly by Huang Ruo and David Henry Hwang - I wanted more from this. It has potential, but I think it requires a fair amount of reshaping before it will be a more viable work. Good, solid cast with a stunning countertenor at center - Kangmin Justin Kim. I look forward to hearing more from him.

Not a bad haul, all told. And next weekend we have Susannah at Wolf Trap. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You remind me of a friend who came to visit from Canada, and wanted opera, and I asked Otello in Frankfurt or La Traviata in Wiesbaden? and he said: both, of course. - We had two in common, did you see? I'll write about the Ukrainian baritone who was Demetrius one of these days. Our Madama Butterfly and the director were already on the Main page, - not the tenor yet, - problem: he was sick in the premiere so no review. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:34, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Ah, no. Not Madama Butterfly...M. Butterfly, after the play by David Henry Hwang. It was a world premiere, actually.

As for Midsummer, it was my first prolonged exposure to the piece, and I'm in love - I always loved most of Britten's operas, and it's no exception. And it was beautifully done, too. DMMO performs in the round, and that makes for a very engaging evening. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:28, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - today: "my" concert of the year (so far) is on the Main page, but not pictured, and I don't understand why --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:06, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: For variety, perhaps? It's been ages since I did anything with DYK, honestly - I don't get involved there any more. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:20, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One reason given was that the pic of the choir isn't about the bold topic (the piece Salmo 150), and another that the choir wasn't pictured singing that piece, - as if they'd look any different singing another. (I'd never disturb a concert by picture taking, so it was of course of the encore, Dona nobis pacem, an arrangement that Bach's 16th successor had made of Bach's Air.) - I'll try again with the next piece, Mendelssohn ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Good luck. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:34, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the church where I heard VOCES8. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Very nice. :-) Nothing new to report for me here, but I'm currently thinking about going to see Lawrence Brownlee in Philadelphia at the end of next month. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xizi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xizi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xizi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ghrenghren (talk) 11:01, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mrs. Pierre Bacot (Marianne Fleur Du Gue).jpg[edit]

The file File:Mrs. Pierre Bacot (Marianne Fleur Du Gue).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Mrs. Pierre Bacot (Marianne Fleur Du Gue) MET DT2795.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:26, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for 'List' categories, please?[edit]

Dear Ser Amantio di Nicolao,
At your convenience, please would you assist me by adding one or more appropriate categories to the list article I have just moved: List of candidates for the Man in the Iron Mask? I have looked for categories such as "Lists of prisoners" or "Lists of people imprisoned for life" but don't seem to be able to find any such. Thank you so much for your consideration and helpful support, whenever convenient.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^{(become old-fashioned!)} 00:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pdebee: Came up with a couple of likely candidates. There may be more out there that I can't think of, but these should do for a start. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:35, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleague,

Thank you so much for your prompt and most helpful assistance with this! I can see the new categories you put in place, and I have now propagated them into all the relevant articles. I am so grateful to you for taking the time to help, as I am certain I would have struggled to do what's required, or even to understand how to do it! Maybe one day I'll learn how to use HotCat but, for now, thank you once again for your much-valued assistance!
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^{(become old-fashioned!)} 13:30, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar for you! ... ;-)) ...[edit]

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		Dear colleague, Thank you so much for your willingness to assist your fellow editors with your in-depth knowledge and expertise in setting up categories in Wikipedia articles. Please know that your prompt and most helpful support is very much appreciated. Please keep well and joyful. With kind regards; Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^{(become old-fashioned!)} 13:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pdebee: Thanks very much. I can highly recommend HotCat - I have learned a lot about categorization from using it over the years. And what I especially like is that it automatically suggests categories when you begin typing...so if you're not sure of a title, it can help you figure that out. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're most welcome. And thank you also for recommending HotCat; I'll invest some time in learning about it and see what happens, although I only worry about categories when I am creating an article and, this time, the arcane nature of the subject made it somewhat difficult to find the appropriate ones. Thanks once more for your helpful assistance!

With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^{(become old-fashioned!)} 16:37, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henson Cuffie for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Henson Cuffie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henson Cuffie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Bulbophyllum kupense[edit]

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bulbophyllum kupense".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:30, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Junior Paul for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junior Paul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junior Paul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marvin Frederick for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marvin Frederick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marvin Frederick (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dwayne Leo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dwayne Leo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwayne Leo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:22, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marc Marshall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Marshall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Marshall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Desmond Noel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Desmond Noel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Desmond Noel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kimron Redhead for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kimron Redhead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimron Redhead until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:49, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shanon Phillip for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shanon Phillip is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanon Phillip until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2020[edit]

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2020. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2020. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are just getting caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply (with a ping) to let us know not to send you any more. Also, we notice you haven't been very active here recently, and hope you will consider increasing your participation. The backlog is relatively high and we could really use your help. Regardless, thanks again for your past effort. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:15, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Why thank you kindly for this. I'll attempt to look in some on new pages in the near future - no promises, though. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With the high backlog at NPP, we will absolutely take your "will attempt (no promise)" :-) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Wiley[edit]

Wiley’s latest novel, The Grievers’ Group, was published by Stay Thirsty Press in paperback on July 24, 2022. ISBN: 979-8218045258. 2601:240:D700:C840:1058:B047:5F5B:1A71 (talk) 12:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:240:D700:C840:1058:B047:5F5B:1A71: You can add that to his article, as long as it's sourced. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Travis Mill, Virginia[edit]

The article Travis Mill, Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this was an unincorporated community, and no significant coverage for the mill to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:38, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mill Creek, Albemarle County, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mill Creek, Albemarle County, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mill Creek, Albemarle County, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Reedy Mill, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reedy Mill, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reedy Mill, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 03:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Colemans Mill Crossing, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Colemans Mill Crossing, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colemans Mill Crossing, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:00, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded non-neutral language/description[edit]

To the article Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs has now been added an inappropriate and non-neutral "racist" in the introduction: "Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs is a 1943 racist Merrie Melodies animated short directed by Bob Clampett." Could you do something about it and remove said word, please? 151.37.20.71 (talk) 15:05, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the place to negotiate such a change, far less if you're using an IP to avoid a block. Acroterion (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@151.37.20.71:, Acroterion: That's number one. Number two: you've attempted to rope me into this before, and I'm not interested. If you want to discuss changes to the article, go to the article talk page and do so there. Don't keep coming around to other editors with the begging bowl asking them to make changes for you. (For the record: I reverted similar changes before. Not because I agree one way or the other with them, but because they were done out of process by someone refusing to seek consensus.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lawthorne Mill, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawthorne Mill, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawthorne Mill, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 15:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to A Certain Magical Index: The Movie – The Miracle of Endymion, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 04:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2019[edit]

		The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award
		For over 1,000 article reviews during 2019. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Once again - thank you kindly. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in September 2022[edit]

Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241

Online events:

New: Alphabet run: E and F | Women writers and their works
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

Request for help:

Participate in preparations for our trend-setting contest in November

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Bridget (Guilty Gear)[edit]

Hey man, I wanted to ask an unbiased admin to come in and help with this page. There's been multiple back-and-forth arguments since the character has been released, but the bottom line that was established is that there's not a concrete answer due to lack of information from the Japanese version from how they're marketing Bridget and how it conflicts with the English version. User:Yndtbt made a very in the middle change to the article and User:TheresNoTime, who I found out is an admin, almost immediately changed it and shut down any attempts to listen to reason. User:TheresNoTime also identifies as Trans, which leads me to believe that they are letting their personal bias and feelings affect their decision-making and ability to listen to reason, and as such, I don't feel they should have the ability to abuse their admin power. Until Arc System Works comes out and gives an official answer, there's been enough of an argument to change Bridget's page back to the way it was, especially since the primary people who keep insisting that the page be left the way it attack other users like this, "cope harder dip shit sockpuppet that only ever posts on this one page. FemaleCorrin (talk) 04:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]" (this was on the Talk page for Bridget). I would greatly appreciate if you, an unbiased 3rd-party, could come in and help out with this and allow the changes of Bridget's identifiers back to male and allow the revision that User:Yndtbt did for Bridget's page. SPiR1000 (talk) 22:16, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SPiR1000: This is not a field in which I have any particular interest or knowledge, so I'm going to defer to other editors. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:22, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SPiR1000: What's your relation to Yndtbt, given that you're a brand new account immediately wading into this dispute? Is this making the rounds on Twitter/Reddit/etc. again, or were you specifically asked to come make this comment? — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 00:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, grow up, Sammy. Wikipedia accounts can be made any day, but the people behind them weren’t born yesterday.

As a Japanese transgender woman, I find your utter lack of neutrality conspicuous. My edit reverted Bridget’s gender to the factually supported one given the original Japanese version of -Stride-, and even conceded that the localization of it seems to change him into a trans female (and pointed out how it’s transphobic). I could discuss this matter with you on some other platform, but the gist of it is that whatever can be explained by Bridget struggling with a female transgender identity can be explained better by Bridget struggling with his female outer appearance not matching his internal male gender identity.

Judging by the fact that you resort to ad hominem about the ages of the people arguing against your position, instead of countering the contents of their arguments, you’re not in any position to exercise moderation on Bridget’s article. Conflict of interest and everything.

And even if you’re trans as your Userpage says, and assuming that Bridget was intended to be a trans woman in the English version, you SHOULDN’T support how the character is written. The character was raised as a girl unwillingly, a pretty close parallel to gender conversion therapy, an inhumane and discredited form of “therapy”. Yndtbt (talk) 10:36, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"And even if you’re trans as your Userpage says" — my user page does not say that? "you SHOULDN’T support how the character is written" — I have no idea how the character is written. Not read a single bit of whatever this series is. First I heard of it was when this disruption started. I have no motive in this, as I couldn't care less how a fictional character is written — you clearly do, and you're allowing your fandom to dictate how you edit to push a point of view. — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 13:08, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, then can you at least defer to other editors who can be unbiased in this matter? I brought this to your attention because I felt an admin is abusing their authority in regards to this page and is purposely letting their emotions dictate their thoughts. It's seen as plain as day when they dismissed the user I mentioned revision and called it "disruptive editing" and said people were just making their rounds again. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you kindly and have a great day. SPiR1000 (talk) 22:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SPiR1000: I am not going to get involved one way or the other. Furthermore, I don't know TheresNoTime, but I have no reason to believe that they are allowing personal bias to get in the way of their behavior, and I am not going to revert them simply because you feel that way. I would caution you in future against assigning motives to other editors like that; it does not reflect well on you, and makes other editors far less likely to be sympathetic to your position.

I do agree that certain language on the talkpage is less than ideal, but I would prefer to let other editors already involved in the discussion deal with that. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TheresNoTime: I'm gonna respond to both inquires you left. I have no relation to Yndtbt. I'm just tired of seeing this shit continue on. I figured after a certain point, where we didn't have concrete confirmation from the Japanese devs, who kept avoiding the issue, that Bridget's page can be reverted back to how it initially was; enough arguments had been made in favor of it. Yndtbt had made neutral enough changes to satisfy both sides until an official consensus was brought to light and yet, you came in, both times it happened, and reverted changes both times. Your user page doesn't say your trans, but it does say you're part of the LGBT community, so it doesn't make sense why you keep fighting this, especially when the person who has been changing Bridget's page to occupy both sides of the argument COMPLETELY OUTED THEMSELVES AS A TRANS PERSON.

You say you don't have any interest in this character or series, only heard about it when everything started going down, and that you have no motive and couldn't care less how a fictional character is written. If that is the case, then why do you keep reverting back changes made to make the page ultimately more neutral?! Since you said you don't care, let me remind you: there is no clear consensus for how Bridget is supposed to be referred to. Even if he is referred to as a girl for the English version, it's hotly debated that him referring to himself as a girl in the Japanese version is a tongue-in-cheek way that feminine boys do in Japan (as in, not seriously at all), and nobody, not even the Japanese devs who made him, refer to him at all as a girl in Japan. You wouldn't care about this, but you care enough to revert back changes made by people with no ill-will. Otherwise, why would you go out of your way to block Yndtbt's editing privileges, since you viewed it as a "personal attack"?

Nothing I said was a personal attack, I was simply stating facts. You clearly have some bias on this subject, otherwise you would have left the changes as they were. That article you listed at the end of your 2nd message had a very good point: "All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic." Both times that Yndtbt made changes were with this principle in mind, which you didn't seem to care about. I didn't want to bring this up to you, because it would have been the same as talking to a wall, plus you would have just tried to ban me or shut me down because you would have taken any criticism for how you're handling things as an attack. That's why I went to an unbiased 3rd party to try and get some help, because nothing would have changed with you constantly looming over Bridget's page like a hawk. I don't care how long you've been an admin, how long you've been on Wikipedia, or how many thousands of edits you've made, people change over time and you're showing that by going against the very principle of Wikipedia, shutting down any attempts of discussion and abusing your authority because of ill-conceived notions you think we have against you, when all we're trying to have is discussions and have you listen to reason. You think I'm wrong on everything I've stated? Then prove me wrong and let Yndtbt's changes stay until we have a clear concise answer on how Bridget should be referred to. Until then, you can try to silence me in any way you want, but nothing that I've stated is wrong and you can't change or revert that no matter how much you try. SPiR1000 (talk) 16:39, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SPiR1000: What do you want me to do, honestly? The above is now just accusing me of The Wrong Version — that, I'm afraid, is something I can do nothing about. If there is there is no clear consensus (something which I agree with you on) then I am very sorry, but the onus is on you to get consensus to make the changes. In a dispute, which this is, the status quo remains. I would caution you to calm down, stop shouting, and quit with attributing malice where there is none. — TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 16:52, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SPiR1000: my above comment notwithstanding, I'm not going to edit the article again and will remove the edit protection from it — consider my hands washed of the damn thing

— TheresNoTime (talk • she/her) 16:55, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding BOM into Box Office Mojo[edit]

Your edits keep on expanding BOM into Box Office Mojo in citations. I shortened it to save on the space, why do you keep restoring it? Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 08:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Roman Reigns Fanboy: It's likely being expanded by AutoWikiBrowser as one of the automatic changes whenever I add a category. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doraemon: Nobita's Little Star Wars 2021[edit]

I don’t know why you are catagorizing this as an 2020s American film when the film is Japanese. Can you please explain me? DoraShin15, 12:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DoraShin15: It's in the category Category:Parody films based on Star Wars, so it got pulled into my list when I was making it. I do usually try to exclude things, but this one slipped through. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing all the video game articles from the "Video games developed in Japan" and "Taito games" categories?[edit]

Lately, I have a feeling that you've removed most of the video games from the "Video games developed in Japan" and "Taito games" categories. It kinda bugs me to no end. Are you removing the categories for a reason? Please let me know, okay? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 23:42, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Angeldeb82: The articles from which I have removed categories are already in subcategories of those categories. For instance - all of the Taito games I removed are in the subcategory Category:Taito arcade games. Similarly, with the articles from the categories such as Category:Taito games: that category is a subcategory of Category:Video games developed in Japan, so there's no reason for them to be in both, per WP:Categorization. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:29, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1767 in Africa[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1767 in Africa indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:30, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You would have thought something notable might have happened on the continent in a year wouldn't you...♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Travis Mill, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Travis Mill, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Travis Mill, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 00:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chenaults Shop, Virginia[edit]

The article Chenaults Shop, Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this is or was a community; could not locate significant coverage to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 02:47, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2018[edit]

		The New Page Reviewer's Iron Award
		For over 360 article reviews during 2018. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: Once again - thanks for the hardware. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Names of towns[edit]

I want to report user:Mai-Sachme who changes names as he wants at towns which stay in Italy such as Ortisei and Bressanone: I moved titles of articles in correct manner but he is an edit warrior. Under Italian law, official name is Bressanone-Brixen or Brixen-Bressanone but that person ever removes Italian name and same situation persists on Ortisei. Ciao Staiolone (talk) 7:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC) 5.90.5.170 (talk) 07:18, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am user Staiolone: in this moment my IP is 5.90.5.170 Staiolone (talk) 07:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Staiolone: Have you attempted to discuss this with the user, either here or on the talkpage for the article? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The official website [4] for Ortisei does call it Chemun de Urtijëi though has comune.ortisei in the web address and I would have thought that Ortisei would be preferable for an Italian place name on En Wikipedia.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:05, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Staiolone, there is a Wikipedia policy, that deals with the question. Please read WP:NBZ. Cheers, Mai-Sachme (talk) 15:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your link confirms that you are wrong: you have to use two languages that are Italian and German according to Italian law regarding names of towns because South Tyrol is a territory in Italy. Furthermore I did not remove names in double languages, but you are obsessed against only Italian names of towns which stay in Italy: your hate against Italian language is blatant and absurd regarding this point, which is under laws by Italian government. These are links of official sites https://www.brixen.it/it%20 and https://www.comune.ortisei.bz.it/it Ortisei is only in Italian language and Brixen-Bressanone is in double languages--Staiolone (talk) 17:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the last sentence on WP:NBZ: Therefore, articles about locations in South Tyrol are placed according to the language of the linguistic majority. The policy has been implemented consistently for one and a half decades by now. Mai-Sachme (talk) 18:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rule is this: "We recommend choosing a single name, by some objective criterion, even a somewhat arbitrary one. Simple Google tests are acceptable to settle the matter, despite their problems; one solution is to follow English usage where it can be determined, and to adopt the name used by the linguistic majority where English usage is indecisive".--Staiolone (talk) 06:26, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5,000,000+ edits... how?[edit]

I am in awe over your ability to have made 5,000,000+ edits. Can you teach me your ways? It is not simply about "making a high number of edits", but I am impressed by this level of productivity and would love to help build on the encyclopedia in some manner as you have! — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 04:34, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Oopsemoops: Thanks for the kind words, but really, there are no "ways" to teach. Part of it is that I've found a manner of editing that works for me; part of it is simply that I've had this account for 16 years, so there's been plenty of time for me to rack edits up. The best way to contribute is to find something that works for you and to plug away at it. What I'd recommend for starters is simply to lurk on a few pages and watch - that way you can learn the editing syntax, and you can suss out what sorts of things you'd most like to be involved in. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:33, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Grazi. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:20, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see you use AWB and add cats or something? Can you tell me more about how you find what you'd like to add cats to and how you use AWB perhaps to that end? — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:21, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Oopsemoops: Information about AutoWikiBrowser is here. As for categories: it's really a lot of watching and learning, simple as that. Trial and error - figuring out what articles make sense in which categories, which I usually do by observing the kind of categories that exist on other articles. That's the best place to start with understanding categorization, I find. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There was an article written about you in 2018, as I am sure you know, that said that you were able to use some tool to do 500+ edits per day, I am assuming that tool was AWB. Also, that you were able to publish multiple edits without actually hitting the "publish" button 5,000,000+ times. Is that true that AWB will publish multiple edits with a single click, if configured correctly, and that the article that mentions your work was referring to AWB? TY. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 21:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Oopsemoops: Yes, AutoWikiBrowser is one tool that I use. Another is Cat-a-lot, which is the tool that can publish multiple edits simultaneously. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinating. I had not heard of cat-a-lot, but maybe I'd like it a lot. I suppose I should give it a try, why not? — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 01:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am also impressed by the amount of edits you have contributed. 5000000 is a lot. P.s. I have already made a post about this on your talk page. I am 2001:8003:B1B8:BF00:DC70:AC4A:4821:E057 Just with a different IP. 2001:8003:B1B8:BF00:9541:78E9:CB4:9EE4 (talk) 07:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lawthorne Mill, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lawthorne Mill, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawthorne Mill, Virginia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 15:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aylett Mill, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aylett Mill, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aylett Mill, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 15:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fletcher Mill, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fletcher Mill, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fletcher Mill, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

–dlthewave ☎ 15:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metropolis (1927 film)[edit]

Are you familiar with this film? If so, why are you adding categories which are wildly inappropriate for it? It is neither an "adventure film" nor a "horror film" by any reasonable definition of those terms Can you provide sources which describe the film that way? Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:33, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: Looks like there's a bug in the category tree I was using...I'll do some digging and try to figure out how it got in there. That said: I have some (barely) passing familiarity with the film, and seeing it on a list of "horror" films struck me as not inappropriate, which is why I didn't think of removing it. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carters Store, Virginia[edit]

The article Carters Store, Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Newspaper searches show that this was literally just a store, not a community. Not enough coverage to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Smith Store, Virginia[edit]

The article Smith Store, Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Newspaper searches show that this was literally just a store, not a community. Not enough coverage to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 03:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poarch Store, Virginia[edit]

The article Poarch Store, Virginia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Could not find any coverage to verify the existence of a community (or anything else, for that matter) at this location. No newspaper results, nothing on topos until the 2010s.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 04:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September music[edit]

Thank you for sorting categories all around! - Today I met two places of higher education that don't have cats yet: Musikhochschule Lübeck and Leopold Mozart Centre. - This rose pic was taken on 11 Sep 2021, and that day in 2022 was full of music, Tag des offenen Denkmals, not only singing in church and rehearsals for Verdi's Requiem, but two concerts at special places pictured, one a synagogue (pictured on its wall). Today three DYK: a piece we'll perform on Sunday, a violinist we heard in June playing the Berg Concerto (my brother played in the orchestra), and a Youth Orchestra shaped by a conductor who recently died. Almost too much of a good thing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Ack, sorry, this fell through the cracks yesterday. I don't have much to report at this end, except that choir rehearsals have started up again; we're looking at Magnificats by Isabella Leonarda, Dietrich Buxtehude, and an anonymous Bolivian (edited by Piotr Nawrot). Also some Ukrainian things and a couple of other small pieces by composers like Margaret Bonds and Kevin Siegfried. (Three of those previously listed are my own articles, incidentally. :-)) The concert season is just starting, but now I've got to figure out what I want to see and where. I'm still thinking of going up to Philadelphia to hear Lawrence Brownlee sing Rodrigo in Otello, but that's the most concrete thing I can think of at the moment. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:20, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you - our organ is organ of the month in the diocese - more later --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:34, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that Otello, with three leading tenors! - I usually write the articles about the music we sing, including the two coming up. For the psalm, I even tackled lilypond, at least for the first 2 measures without text, - DanCherek did the rest, and Michael Bednarek the finishing touch. I couldn't find much about the mass. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:12, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: To be honest, it's less Otello that interests me and more Brownlee - I have been a fan for as long as I can remember, and his performance in Zelmira with Washington Concert Opera in 2019 was one of the most transformative evenings I've ever spent in the theater. He made me reconsider several long-held opinions about Rossini as a composer of serious opera.

We don't usually do any individual pieces important enough to warrant an article, but I've written a few things about some of the composers whose music we've done over the years - Roland Carter, for instance, last year. Piotr Nawrot is a colleague of our director's at Georgetown University - we've performed some of the Bolivian Baroque pieces that he's edited over the years. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - Today, we sang old music for two choirs at church, pictured, scroll to the image of the organ of the month of the Diocese of Limburg (my perspective), and if you have time, watch the video about it --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC):::: ... and today I wrote an article about music premiered today, Like as the hart. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I would say "very nice", but I'm afraid I have more than passing familiarity with Weir's work, so I'll reserve judgment until I hear for myself. :-) I must say I'm intrigued by the James MacMillan, though, that appears to have also been on the program. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:15, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The other now also has an article ;) - travel and strings sound --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I created Category:Kronberg im Taunus, but feel there should also be "People from ..." and "Buildings ..." and "Culture ...", - it would be strange to have a town cat for a person. I also believe the town should have more parents, such as Rhine Main so-and-so --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:44, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I can try and have a look. Unfortunately, I fell and broke my arm on Saturday, so I don't know what my editing will look like for the foreseeable future. And Philadelphia's out, alas. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the best for recovery! I'm impressed that you still edit! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Using the tools isn't so bad; I can manage those one-handed fairly well. It's the one-handed typing that gets me every time. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 12:20, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you also sort categories on the commons? Returned from singing Verdi's Requiem with conductor Johannes Schröder on his 31st birthday, I find commons cat Johannes Schröder occupied by a chemist who has no article in English. Help? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:28, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Sure...I can take a look in a bit. Shouldn't be too difficult to sort out. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I think it's all sorted out now. It may take a little time to show up, thanks to lag, but it's there. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I gave him a few cats. I wonder about "conductors". Once a year, such a person is a Conductor (of an orchestra), therefore I left him in Choral conductors. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: That seems reasonable to me. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Gilley for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Gilley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Gilley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tom Reedy (talk) 02:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Verna Rose[edit]

The article Verna Rose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:BASIC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Meena • 13:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Names of towns 2[edit]

I restored correct names in Italian language of Ortisei and Bressanone but user:Mai-Sachme persists in edit war. What to do? Staiolone (talk) 06:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Staiolone. Mai-Sachme (talk) 07:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Staiolone: I'm not interested in getting involved - please stop asking me. Please read Wikipedia:Edit warring, and listen to other editors when they give you advice. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy[edit]

Hi. We're under a mass attack again. If you could stop for a moment making a million edits a minute, that'd be great--thanks! Drmies (talk) 00:53, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: Got another set of categories to work up now. That should cool things down for a bit. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Look in recent changes and you'll see this a thousand times. I need a fucking filter manager to get on this. Are you on IRC? It's just me and Discospinster cleaning it up. Drmies (talk) 00:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I'm not, sorry - and in a few minutes (soon as my radio program is over) I have to head out on an errand, I'm afraid. But I'll see what I can do in the meantime. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:57, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New wiki article suggestion[edit]

Hi there, I saw that you have been working on several wiki articles on classical music. I think it would be great, if there would exist a Wikipedia Article on German (Hamburg) pianist Alexander Krichel and I was wondering if you would want to create one? I already added him to the requested articles list (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles/music/Performers,_bands_and_songwriters). All the best Natalie 2003:E4:F23:1200:1155:DBF3:D993:A762 (talk) 13:18, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@2003:E4:F23:1200:1155:DBF3:D993:A762: I'm afraid I'm not familiar with his work, sorry - so I wouldn't be the best person to ask. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:52, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oklahoma songwriter[edit]

Can you add Oklahoma singer songwriter from Oklahoma Jeremy Castle to singer songwriter page. His music is seemingly influential to state of Oklahoma. Dreamerofdreams124 (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamerofdreams124: He doesn't appear to have an article, sorry. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add a basic one of him? Dreamerofdreams124 (talk) 19:06, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamerofdreams124: Sorry, but I'm not especially interested in singer-songwriters. Also, I did a cursory search online for information, and I don't think there are enough sources to establish notability. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks. Dreamerofdreams124 (talk) 19:28, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to do a discography only?

I know “You Ain’t Met My Girl” has millions of views and I found him on all music Dreamerofdreams124 (talk) 19:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamerofdreams124: It depends very much on what sources are available. I would say no...if there's not enough information to write an article there won't be enough to compile a discography. But I would do a Google search to see what turns up. Remember that views are a potentially usable metric, but won't mean anything if there isn't any more information available online. Se here for more information. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am finding some articles May I send them to you those wise I can find Dreamerofdreams124 (talk) 19:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamerofdreams124: Again...I'm not interested in creating an article. Country music is not a field of interest for me, particularly. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you do you hear contact who might do so Dreamerofdreams124 (talk) 19:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamerofdreams124: It's generally frowned upon to ask other people to create articles for you. What you can do is work on creating one yourself. You can ask for help over at Wikipedia:Teahouse. I might also look around Wikipedia:WikiProject Country Music and see if there's someone there who could help you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Don’t know how to Dreamerofdreams124 (talk) 20:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamerofdreams124: Again - I would direct you to Wikipedia:Teahouse for more information. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:03, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you![edit]

hi Rosedaler (talk) 17:32, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosedaler: Hello. Thanks very much. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:50, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Verna Rose[edit]

The article Verna Rose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of meeting GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male YouTubers removed from Roland (entertainer[edit]

Hello, I am curious as to why this category was removed. The subject has a very active YouTube channel which is frequently reported in other media. Does the article not have enough content to support this yet? Thanks, Londonbeat41692 (talk) 19:24, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Londonbeat41692: He's now categorized under Category:Japanese male YouTubers, which is a subcategory of Category:Male YouTubers. No need for him to be in both. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 19:27, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I’m impressed.[edit]

Day 2 of editing, and I found a Wikipedia editor with 5000000 edits. I can’t believe anyone has succeeded. If you want to see the very large amount of edits I have done [for an IP user], go to my contributions. 2001:8003:B1B8:BF00:DC70:AC4A:4821:E057 (talk) 11:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question about copyright violation[edit]

Primefac has accused me of copyright violation and deleted about 23 of my blockquotes. I feel as if I have walked into a store and been accused of shoplifting. Why am I not totally banned from Wikipedia? I am completely baffled. Please consider the "View history" entries for Birdsey Renshaw. How is the blockquote that has been deleted from the Birdsey Renshaw article not fair use under copyright law? Consider the following Wikiquote article https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Drift_seed — is that copyright violation? Suslindisambiguator (talk) Suslindisambiguator (talk) 08:02, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Suslindisambiguator: It looks alright to me, but I've never been the best at figuring out the boundaries for copyright law on Wikipedia. For advice on something like this I usually turn to Diannaa. Personally, I see nothing wrong with the judicious use of blockquotes now and again, but I don't want to steer you wrong. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 12:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response — very helpful. Suslindisambiguator (talk) Suslindisambiguator (talk) 12:33, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Suslindisambiguator, Ser Amantio di Nicolao. Excessive quotations are not a violation of the copyright policy per se, but rather a violation of our non-free content guideline. Wikipedia has a very strict copyright policy, stricter in some ways than copyright law itself, because our fair use policy does not allow us to copy material from copyright sources when there's a freely licensed alternative available. In this case the freely licensed material is prose that we write ourselves. In other words, Wikipedia is not intended to be a massive collection of quotes, but rather original prose written by Wikipedians, prose that is eligible to be released under our Creative Commons license, not restricted by copyright in any other way, and available for re-use under license. You hopefully can see why quotations cannot be our default way of editing.

I personally would not perform revision deletion on quotations (though I have done so in the past), but I have removed lots of them myself over time. — Diannaa (talk) 12:37, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not so much concerned about the deleted blockquotes as I am about the deleted references. The actually number of deleted references seems to be rather small (5 to 10 altogether?) — but I would like to examine them. I still think that the questionable articles should have been moved to draftspace. Suslindisambiguator (talk) Suslindisambiguator (talk) 12:49, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to ask the person who removed the quotes. — Diannaa (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2022[edit]

Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244

Online events:

New: Alphabet run: G and H | Women in STEM / Ada Lovelace Day | Geofocus West Asia
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

See also:

Women in Green's "Wildcard Edition" Good Article editathon

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of Village Creek (Neches River tributary)[edit]

The article Village Creek (Neches River tributary) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

an article referring to the same water body exists here

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women rabbis and Torah scholars[edit]

Hi. If/when you have time and inclination, would you please add {{WikiProject Women in Religion}} to the articles in Category:Women rabbis and Torah scholars and its subcats? I started doing so by hand about a week ago but stopped when I realized that there was the snafu with shift in wikiproject name (which is now resolved). Thanks. --Rosiestep (talk) 12:09, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also Category:Women Buddhist clergy and subcats, but NOT Category:Fictional Buddhist nuns as I don't know if the wikiproject includes fictional characters within its scope. --Rosiestep (talk) 12:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Done. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:09, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Rosiestep (talk) 13:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Photographs from Williamsburg[edit]

Last we spoke, I think you mentioned you might want pictures of the Wren Building. Are there any other sites within 10 miles of CW/WM that might need images? I plan to grab one of the new Hearth: Memorial to the Enslaved and another of a rare 17th-century prayer book, but as of now don't have any other specific photo objectives. ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:03, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti: I can't think of anything else offhand, except maybe a few general campus shots (I'd love eventually to have pictures of every building on campus on Commons); if I do I'll let you know. That being said: do you ever use the "Nearby" feature on mobile? (There's something similar on Wikidata, too, I believe.) I find that useful for noting locations that require illustration.

Give my regards to the 'Burg; I'm sorry to miss it this year. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:24, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kentucky[edit]

Just looking at Loretta Lynn's birthplace, can't see the road on google street view unfortunately. I'm sure you've driven through Kentucky, looks a delightful place. I'd love to drive southwest from where you are down to Nashville! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: The mountains of eastern Kentucky are quite lovely, as is the Ohio River and its surroundings. Nashville, too. Been a while since I went out that way - this summer I drove west via Ohio instead. And I haven't been in Tennessee in a few years, sadly. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:51, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October music[edit]

Food for thought: I just added Category:Roman Catholic churches completed in the 1080s to today's pictured church. Questions: our article is Catholic Church, - do we need "Roman"? If yes, can we have redirects without that, because who would search for it? When this church was built, Catholic had a different meaning, + this church is no longer Catholic, - wouldn't simply "Churches completed ..." be better, at least for the centuries before the Reformation? Still no end: it was consecrated that year, incomplete. So perhaps "Churches from ...". Last: How about a cat "Churches dedicated to Martin of Tour", - there's St. Martin's Church? -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:16, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I know there was a long discussion a few years ago about the terminology, and the upshot was that "Catholic" is preferred to "Roman Catholic". Why the inconsistency, I don't know, but it's more complicated than I want to get involved in. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understand, and what do you think about this "completed" thingy. Many churches were never completed. I could imagine just "1083 churches", as we say Category:1971 songs without specifying if that means written or published. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I believe the categories used to be like that, actually - Category:1994 architecture and the like. I do understand why they were changed...regardless, nothing's perfect, I suppose. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably right ;) - today's DYK: two facts from the two concert of this years Rheingau Musik Festival I liked best, both a cappella singing. If you follow the songs, you see a circus, where I performed singing, and in the end the whole tent joined for Dona nobis pacem. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Very nice. Still not much to report here - I did attempt to write an article this weekend; it worked, but was an unpleasant experience. I'll try again in a couple of weeks. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

thank you - who shall separate us? - I thought the motets could use more individual categories, at least by century, also sacred vs. secular, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I'll give it some thought, but I suspect by composer would be likelier - I don't know if there's precedent for by-date, except for opera. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hymns in German go by century - leaving the month with reformation and a cat treat --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: I thought I detected your hand in at least one of those. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Osvaldo Moles[edit]

Good morning, dearest Alexius, how are you? me I'm fine.

Please, do you have 5 minutes to read the new page I've opened? may be I wrote some mistakes.... thanks a lot for your important help. Rei Momo (talk) 08:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women theologians[edit]

Hi there. If/When you have time/inclination, would you please add {{WikiProject Women in Religion}} to the talkpages of Category:Women theologians and its two subcats? Thanks! Rosiestep (talk) 17:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And to Category:Female religious leaders and its subcats? (Till just now, it was missing from Alice Curwen, who has the Category:Women Protestant religious leaders, which is what led me to making the boarder request.) Thanks! --Rosiestep (talk) 17:46, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Sure - I should be able to do it tonight. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:56, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Done. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:21, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're the best. Thanks, Ser! --Rosiestep (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosiestep: Anything for you. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:30, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you![edit]

thanks for all the work you do! Kadeblade (talk) 19:47, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kadeblade: Thanks very much - you're very kind. I'll save it for dessert. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greek footballers[edit]

Hey, what's up with the mass removal of entries at Category:Greek footballers? Is this intentional or a mistake? Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:19, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499:: They're in subcategories of Category:Footballers by city or town in Greece; per Wikipedia:Categorization, there's no reason for them to be in the parent category. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:24, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This change involves hundreds of thousands of football bios. An RfC probably needs to be opened. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nehme1499:: I'm fine with that, and will hold off on doing any more for now. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The head category is non-diffusing - particularly given the serious BLP issues with placing people in 'location' categories. Please self-revert. Giant Snowman 18:22, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: It'll have to be this evening, but I will do so. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:13, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, appreciated. Giant Snowman 20:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman: All have been returned to the parent category. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Giant Snowman 09:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:20th-cntury women philanthropists[edit]

Heads up, you have added this redlink with a typo to quite a few articles in your latest AWB run. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Premeditated Chaos: Yeah, just spotted it myself, thanks. I guess I'm not as awake as I thought I was. *sigh* --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:57, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are any of us ever? :) ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Premeditated Chaos: That statement is entirely too philosophical for my current frame of mind. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Press recognition[edit]

Might as well show recognition of your work since I don't think anyone posted this on your talk page. Keep up the good work. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 14:22, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiCleanerMan: Thanks very much - I'm afraid I've been a bit preoccupied these past few weeks. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:42, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sissons Corner, Virginia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sissons Corner, Virginia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sissons Corner, Virginia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reywas92^Talk 17:55, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Namsky District has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:People from Namsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Oymyakonsky District has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:People from Oymyakonsky District has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 08:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Columbia Encyclopedia[edit]

I just bought a single volume Sixth and last edition of this, huge book, over 3100 pages. About 51,000 articles. I wanted a good book I could use for finding a very broad range of traditional topics on here. Amazing to think that in print form we'd currently be like 131 volumes of that in terms of number of articles! Though maybe much less given that many articles are still stubs. I don't think you voted on the Wikipedia:Seven-million pool. Sadly my March 5 2023 guess is going to be way off... Unless I get back into sub stubbing again ;-). Now if we could create decent new articles at the rate you edit with AWB we'd do it!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a stylish silver book with a box, was valued at $125 in 2000, though I got it for a bargain. Weighs 13 pounds LOL. Enables me to find articles I wouldn't think of searching for on here. Love it. Somebody created 1960s to present categories for that Category:Indian films by decade BTW. You've already done most of the big countries though I think, thanks for that, I appreciate it. 7 million article mark, probably won't be until well into 2025 now I think... ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: When I started my last job, I treated myself to a remaindered copy of the New Grove Dictionary of American Music - eight volumes. I haven't used it as much as I'd like, largely because it's so damn heavy I can barely manipulate it. I regret nothing. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love that, I have the New Grove Dictionary of Jazz, the most comprehensive book for finding jazz musicians. I've already used the Columbia book as a source in Vesoul. I was reading about Uruk earlier. Missing a lot of important articles of course, but very useful for finding core biographies, places and topics I would never find in browsing. It's the most valuable single volume book I've ever seen in my life, a real treasure trove. The box is damaged, that's how I got it cheap! The book is otherwise in near new condition. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:21, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Nice. The same source had a remaindered copy of the New Grove Dictionary of World Music as well, but I only have room on my shelf for one. Still, there's plenty for me to d with the other one. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Told you it was a gem, look what was missing! Jose Glover.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:03, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Nice. Sorry I missed this the other day - I've been nursing a broken left arm, and I find that my ability to pay attention (or to remember to respond to things) is spotty at best these days. It's improving - I actually wrote this message with two hands, which would have been a chore last week. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch! Hope you have a speedy recovery! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: It's getting better - I saw the doctor for the second time yesterday, and I think he was impressed at my progress. I'll have to be in the brace for another month, but it looks like I can get it off once and for all at the end of November. I've been weaning myself off of painkillers for a few days now. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 00:12, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cats question[edit]

Hey, you're removing numerous English language tv shoes from the Category:English-language television shows. I reverted a few because I thought they may be errors, but then figured I just ask instead. Are these removals correct? Examples:

The Witcher (TV series),

Midnight Mass (miniseries),

Another Life (2019 TV series) &

Jupiter's Legacy (TV series).

Thanks - wolf 14:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewolfchild: All are in the subcategory Category:English-language Netflix original programming - I don't think they need to be in the parent as well, per WP:CATEGORIZATION. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 14:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I will self-revert those. Thanks again - wolf 14:59, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Thewolfchild: Any time - happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 15:20, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adding African-American category[edit]

Hi, I saw you added a couple of African-American categories to Russ Nixon. Based on some googling, I do not think he was Black or African-American, so I have deleted those categories. I did want to check if you had a source for that information, though. SS451 (talk) 22:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SS451: Offhand I'm not sure - I'd have to look back over the category history to see where it came from. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

House[edit]

Hello, I was wondering if you could actually add the real photo of our house, or most recent photo.

Olaf Lee House

I think you edited it last….

Thank you. 75.168.246.18 (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@75.168.246.18: It would be better if you added it yourself. I don't have any pictures. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting REVDEL[edit]

Hello Ser Amantio. I'm requesting REVDEL for this edit to the film Supporting Characters. I saw that you were the last person to edit the page before the IP. Seems like a major violation of WP:BLPCRIME, and I couldn't find any information supporting such a bold claim. Thanks. Novemberjazz 17:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Novemberjazz: Thanks for letting me know. I agree - what you showed me is quite problematic-looking. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:31, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1997–98 in English ice hockey[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:1997–98 in English ice hockey indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2001–02 in English ice hockey[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:2001–02 in English ice hockey indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:16, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ethyl lauroyl arginate Modifications[edit]

Dear Ser Amantio di Nicolao,

I have been through this wikipage Ethyl lauroyl arginate and I think there is some non-accurate information.

The E243 number displayed corresponds to the molecule Ethyl Lauroyl arginate HCl, so HCl should be included in the description and title. As well as in the UPAC name and Other names sections.

The CAS Number that corresponds to E243 is 60372-77-2 not the 48076-74-0.

Could you be so kind to make these changes?

Thank you very much.

MCF19 (talk) 08:41, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MCF19: You may make the changes if you wish, as long as you can provide a source for them; I have no particular interest in editing the article, especially as I have scant knowledge at best about chemistry and other sciences. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2022[edit]

Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247

Online events:

New: Alphabet run: I and J | Women in Education | Geofocus Central & Southern Asia
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

See also:

Wikipedia Asian Month November Contest

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Category diffusion and bot-like editing[edit]

In this edit, it appears that you violated WP:CATDIFFUSE. Given that you are editing at a rapid pace (e.g. you made 40 edits during the single minute of 04:35, 27 October 2022), the impact of potential errors is magnified. Could you clarify your process and the approvals you received for the task? {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 04:42, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb: Sometimes I catch myself going faster than I intend given the speed of my tools, and I try to slow down when I see it happening. As for diffusion, I'm currently working on a few tweaks to Category:20th-century American academics. I'll be checking it for diffusion in a few minutes. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:46, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are making 40 edits per minute, I presume you are not checking each individual one. And if you are not checking each edit, per WP:BOTDEF, this would make your editing fall into the bot category, not the semi-automated category. Did you receive approval from the bot approvals group for this task? I know that you do this sort of thing regularly, and that getting approval can be a hassle, but we have a process precisely to ensure that errors don't happen once a task is launched at scale. {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 04:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdkb: I have not - frankly, I'm rarely asked about it. I try to keep my editing pace cooler, as I say - sometimes I forget, and I need a reminder to slow down a bit. As for the category diffusion, I've just completed taking care of that. I do have a method there that I prefer to follow. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.}

Nomination for deletion of Template:Teleiodini-stub[edit]

Template:Teleiodini-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. YorkshireExpat (talk) 21:07, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maaherra[edit]

The article Maaherra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability per WP:GEOLAND. The sv.wiki article to which this is linked only makes a single passing mention of the name Maaherra, so it is unclear whether this is actually even a place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copycat[edit]

Someone really likes your userpage. Roundish ⋆t c) 00:24, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Roundish: Awwwwwwwwwww, it's gone. And I was so looking forward to bothering them about it... --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	For being the Best Editor On Wikipedia. Waylon111 (talk) 23:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Waylon111: That's far from the case, certainly, but thank you nonetheless. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Waylon111 (talk) 23:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	An appreciation for your outstanding contributions to wikipedia since Jan. 2006. :-) Wikipedian10282 (talk) 20:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikipedian10282: Thank you kindly. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:13, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creating new Wikipedia page[edit]

Hello,@Ser Amantio di Nicolao I have a question, is it possible that you create a wikipedia page for an artist music producer from Macedonia because the artist already has Macedonian wikipedia and my question is, is it possible that he also has it in English, the artist's name is Xsoundbeatz Mirjanjanku3 (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mirjanjanku3: Sorry, but that sort of thing isn't a subject in which I have any interest. You can always create the article yourself. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fyi: this is another crosswiki spam attempt, see de:Benutzer:Pentachlorphenol/XSoundb and multiple sockpuppets at Draft:Xsoundbeatz --Johannnes89 (talk) 17:17, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Johannnes89: Figured it might be something like that. But I like to give the benefit of the doubt if possible. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:19, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sulaiman Qabazard[edit]

The article Sulaiman Qabazard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has berm around for many years yet the only thing anyone can say is he participated in one Olympics and placed 27th. Not notable at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BostonMensa (talk) 13:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Media Inquiry[edit]

Hi Steven, I'm working for a national radio station called Newstalk based in Dublin Ireland. I am fascinated by the amount of voluntary work you have done over the course of your life through Wikipedia. I was hoping to contact you for a conversation about your work. Looking forward to hearing from you, John Byrne (john.byrne@bauermedia.ie) Irishgob (talk) 11:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

go[edit]

go Tanish Bainad (talk) 13:48, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Himmler[edit]

Hi. Himmler studied, and received a diploma in, agriculture, not agronomy, but he was never employed as such - the closest he came was a short-lived job with a fertiliser company. I have changed the article to remove any mention of "agronomy", and removed the cat. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 16:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: Sorry - looks like you replaced the cat, and didn't remove it - am I missing something? (It's been the kind of morning that makes me doubt my own existence.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aargh! You are right, thanks for pointing that out. (It looks like I'm having one of those mornings as well!). Beyond My Ken (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: Haven't we all? (I swear, the past couple of years have been one long variation on that theme.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled[edit]

I have requested autopatrolled permission at above from November 9, 2022 but there is no comment or change in my permission so please can you give me autopatroll permission on that page. I have created more that 200 articles in wikipedia in which 99% are notable so please. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ 04:09, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@LordVoldemort728: Sorry, I don't get involved with giving permissions - I'd look for someone who's been more active on that page and ask them for advice. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:30, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thanks 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk} ! 06:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Thanksgiving![edit]

@Dr. Blofeld There's always room for more Thanksgiving! Megalibrarygirl (talk) 14:33, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aw thanks. Hope the kids are doing well! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:42, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Thank you kindly. You know, you can actually introduce the tradition yourself if you want to. :-) We're actually having turkey tonight for the first time in forever...got it at a huge discount from the supermarket. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 22:02, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Dr. Blofeld; and Happy Thanksgiving from my heart to everyone who wants to celebrate it in theirs. --Rosiestep (talk) 06:25, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to start a government petition to get it introduced to the UK!! :-) It seems kind of unfair! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Doc. We always have our British friends over for Thanksgiving. Seems so odd y'all don't have a harvest festival, but they all assure me their first Thanksgiving was here in Mexico with me and Pops. I am thankful that you are all part of my WP network. Wouldn't be here if you and others hadn't pushed me to continue. SusunW (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy (belated) Turkey Day! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:28, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer: Thanks very much - you as well. I hope you've recovered nicely from the food coma. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:02, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in December 2022[edit]

Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250

Online events:

New: Alphabet run K & L | Geofocus Southeast Asia | Women who died in 2022
Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman

See also:

Women in Climate Change collaboration runs 1 December 2022 - 31 January 2023

Tip of the month:

Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name,
like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Come to japan![edit]

Sorry if this is a waste of time for you but I can’t help but notice that in your big list of countries you’ve been to,(truly huge) there is no flag of japan. You should come check it out! I think (know) you will love it! InfernaIBaze (talk) 04:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@InfernaIBaze: I hope to get there someday - not sure when, though. But it'll happen. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 16:28, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That’s great to hear! I’ll be looking forward to it. :) (though I probably won’t be in Japan by the time you come) InfernaIBaze (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please just STOP!?[edit]

See the deletion log on Special:Undelete/User_talk:Xaosflux/UBX/User_cowbell2 for example; why do you repeatedly recreate unwanted pages? — xaosflux ^Talk 12:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: Apologies - it won't happen again, as I'm done with the task once and for all now. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:08, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sinpar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sinpar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinpar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Slatersteven (talk) 13:45, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of an article on Wikipedia[edit]

Hello!

I really like the articles you create, publish or edit on Wikipedia. I’m not a Wikipedia specialist, so I would like to collaborate with a professional who has experience in this field. I would like to publish an article about one entrepreneur, business angel and international investor, on the German or English version of Wikipedia.

I see it as a text about his professional career, investments and philosophy of life. Not PR or advertising articles. My name is Emma Rogers

Let me know if you are interested in describing Hartmann's biography as an author, please. I can give you more information RogEmma (talk) 08:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 13[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jane Aitken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Vaughan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ser Amantio[edit]

December songs
happy new year

I thought of you because this singer was Ser Amantio. - We have now a portrait of our new conductor (by his predecessor) - you may remember the cat question. File:Dr. Johannes Schröder.jpg. Could you add that to his Wikidata box, please. (I can't sign on there.) Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Done. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Enjoy the season, dreaming of peace! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you very much - and the same to you always. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 21:14, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! - Today, pictured, the soprano of our choral concert of the year. More in the context: User talk:Gerda Arendt#DYK for Talia Or, in case of interest. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Nice. We can't usually get anyone of that caliber for our concerts, I'm afraid, although we do get quite a few high-quality soloists from the surrounding area. :-) We're off for Christmas now - we start up again on the third of January with an all-Ukrainian concert for March. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:15, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how our conductor got the quartet, - only the bass had an article (which had been proposed for deletion), but now all four, - she was last. For Verdi, you better have excellent soloists. For our last, our regular bass who was a member of NDR Chor, brought in two colleagues, a married couple who both did it for the first time, and the soprano was from our town, and now sings in Bayreuth. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:52, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gerda Arendt: Our director has begun a relationship through his university with the young artists program at Washington National Opera, so we could be getting some future stars out of that. You did the Requiem? One of our other groups here did it a few years ago with all-local, young soloists - it went very well I thought. (The choral program of the Friday Morning Music Club - I'm not a member, but I have a lot of friends who are.) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Christmas jazz albums[edit]

Hi, surprised there isn't a category or a list. Would it be possible to use AWB to scan jazz artist albums and categorize those with Christmas in the title? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:35, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Should be, depending on the category intersection. I'll take a look in a day or so, once I've gotten through another task. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start a List of Christmas jazz albums list I think, a category would be useful if you feel like doing it. Currently listening to A Dave Brubeck Christmas ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:44, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah we have Category:Jazz Christmas albums... Should there be a redirect as I didn't find it initially? Christmas jazz albums sounds correct, "Jazz Christmas+ doesn't sound right, might just be me.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr. Blofeld: Yeah, I think a redirect would be the right idea. I'll create one in a sec. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 17:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Electrical engineers[edit]

Why are you removing American electrical engineers from Category:American electrical engineers? SpinningSpark 23:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Spinningspark: I only removed the ones in the subcategory Category:American electronics engineers, because they're in the subcat. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:15, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok I see. But that raises a problem I've seen a number of times before; when a person has worked in multiple sub-fields but we only have one sub-category. For instance, Nikola Tesla has worked on radio transmission and remote control so can arguably be counted as an electronics engineer (although he is not categorised as such) but is best known as an electrical power engineer. What is the right thing to do in such cases? SpinningSpark 13:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Spinningspark: Ideally, there should be multiple categories, assuming the multiple fields have had enough notables to populate a category. (i.e.: "American radio engineers", "American electrical engineers", that sort of thing.) Assuming that's not the case...if there are multiple intersecting cases, then I'd consider putting a hatnote up on the category page, so that the casual viewer sees it before attempting to empty the page. Something like "A person might be in category X and category Y at the same time, so please consider that before proceeding further." Otherwise, I might consider marking the category as non-diffusing, though I'd only think of that as a last resort.

Any of that make sense? I'm sort of spitballing here. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:52, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

~~~ Merry Christmas! ~~~
Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа!

Hello, Ser Amantio di Nicolao! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove and leave other users this message by adding {{subst:Multi-language Season's Greetings}}

@Ozzie10aaaa: Why thank you kindly - you as well. :-) --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:06, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phil Ondich for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phil Ondich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Ondich (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:30, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Browns Corner, Virginia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Browns Corner, Virginia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hog Farm _Talk 19:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Writing my Wikipedia page[edit]

Greetings. I would like to know about having a full wikipedia page written. Thanks. Luis 71.117.130.151 (talk) 23:58, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@71.117.130.151: This is not a request I'm prepared to fulfill. Furthermore, I suggest you check out WP:COI before making similar requests. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Touhfat Mouhtare for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Touhfat Mouhtare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touhfat Mouhtare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BD2412 T 05:00, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AWB problem[edit]

In this edit, you broke the hatnote because AWB does not know about {{hatnote group}} and you let it make a change. There is phab ticket on this, but until it is fixed please watch out for this. MB 03:55, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MB: Huh. Thanks for the tip - I don't think I've run into this before. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 03:58, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again at Deimos (deity). MB 04:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@MB: Rats. Thanks for spotting - I completely forgot to check. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:55, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year![edit]

Dear Ser Amantio di Nicolao,
Thank you for being such a helpful colleague to me earlier this year, with the assistance you gave me in defining some tricky categories correctly. I very much appreciated your prompt and effective guidance, and wanted to record my appreciation at this time, when we have the opportunity to look back on what we learned and accomplished this past year. So: thank you once again for your sense of collaboration, and for your help to me.
I send my very best wishes to you and yours for a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year in 2023, in good health, joyful spirits, and a sense of achievement in all that you do, here and in real life.
With kind regards;
Patrick. ツ Pdebee.^(talk)^{(become old-fashioned!)} 11:49, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Pdebee: Thanks very much for the kind words. I'm always happy to be of help - especially as regards something as arcane and esoteric as categories, which can give even the most longstanding of us editors conniption fits. Merry Christmas and happy new year to you and yours as well, and happy editing into 2013 and beyond! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 13:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons greetings[edit]

Ohara Shoson (Koson), Egrets in Snow, Ohara Koson, 1927	Have a wonderful holiday season filled with peace, joy, prosperity and wonder.
	Hi Ser Amantio di Nicolao, Thank you for all your contributions during the year. Your productivity and helpfulness is awe-inspiring! May your 2023 be filled with creativity and good health. Image: Egrets in Snow, Ohara Koson, 1927 Netherzone (talk) 22:52, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Netherzone: Thanks very much for the lovely image and the kind words. Happy editing into 2023 and beyond! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 23:13, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

And a Happy New Year!

May your holidays be filled with peace and joy. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:50, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.

@CAPTAIN RAJU: How lovely - thank you so much for the wonderful sentiment and the kind words. Merry Christmas to you and yours, and happy editing into 2013 and beyond! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:55, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Christmas![edit]

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Magi by Luca Signorelli is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 18:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnbod: Thanks kindly for the sentiment, and for the image - well-chosen as always (though I would expect no less from one of your tastes :-)). Merry Christmas to you and yours, and happy editing into 2023 and beyond! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.}

Women in Red January 2023[edit]

Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254

Online events:

New: Peace and Diplomacy (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run M & N | Geofocus East Asia
Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2022

See also:

Editing For Effie collaboration with the Smithsonian, January 8 & 9 (global event)

Tip of the month:

De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications.
Join the conversations on our talkpage.
Help us plan future events.
Follow us on social media:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Happy New Year, Ser Amantio di Nicolao![edit]

Happy New Year!

Ser Amantio di Nicolao,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 18:10, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 18:10, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Abishe: Thank you kindly - the same to you and yours. Happy editing into 2023 and beyond! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:11, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "File:name of file.jpg" page.[edit]

Hi, you have added this message in bulk to a lot of RPG cover images that I added the infobox image to eg File:AH-Troll-Gods cover 1989.jpg. Please note that these images are deliberately small and of poor quality to fulfil to "The use of the cover will not affect the value of the original work or limit the copyright holder's rights or ability to distribute the original. In particular, copies could not be used to make illegal copies of the book. It is a low resolution image." If a larger image / better quality image is submitted, it is always deleted by the system.

Could you please revert your talk page edits, before someone does try to upload a bigger image and it's auto deleted thanks. Sciencefish (talk) 18:33, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sciencefish: I can look, but I honestly don't know that having a talkpage is going to make a whole lot of difference if someone decides to upload a larger image. Is this something that you've encountered before? --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 18:35, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]