User talk:Sky Groove: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:57, 18 June 2016

Sky Groove, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Sky Groove! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Rakul Preet Singh, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 01:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Sky Groove, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires sources

Please stop adding model heights without providing a citation to a reliably published source that verifies the claim. It is particularly important to source claims about living people. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:14, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swati Kain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trainer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radhika Bartake (January 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Radhika Bartake.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:20, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zabina Abdul Rashid Khan

The article Zabina Abdul Rashid Khan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Comatmebro ^{~Come at me~} 07:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zabina Abdul Rashid Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Miss India Worldwide India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Indian and Asian

Miss India Worldwide (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Asian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Radhika Bartake (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Radhika Bartake.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rinkle gorge (talk) 20:02, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Femina Miss India 1994 (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Femina Miss India 1994.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prateik Jain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Femina Miss India may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| ((n/a|Unplaced}}
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:20, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miss Progress India

Hello, Sky Groove. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Miss Progress India, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rob (talk) 07:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mister United Nations India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Indian and Asian

Mister World India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Femina

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Femina Miss India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Femina

Femina Miss India 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lansdowne

Yasmin Daji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nicole Faria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Debut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Swati Kain

A tag has been placed on Swati Kain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shilpa Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Femina Miss India Delhi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lansdowne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Iona Pinto may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

] (Winner) (Eve's Weekly Miss India World 1960) Eve's Weekly Miss India International 1960) [[Miss International 1960]] (1st Runner Up) [[Miss World 1960]] (Unplaced)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anukriti Gusain may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{s-bef|before=[[Vanya Mishra}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Miss Young India

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Miss Young India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Flat Out let's discuss it 06:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Young India, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Aditi Gowitrikar

added a link pointing to Doctor

Mugdha Godse

added a link pointing to Model

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Femina Miss India may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

entries - one white and one black - in conformity with the apartheid policy of racial separation.}}
|}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sushant Divgikar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VJ. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mink Brar

added a link pointing to Producer

Radha Bartake

added a link pointing to Pukar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Puneet Beniwal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lara Dutta Bhupathi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss India Tourism Pageant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pageant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Manasvi Mamgai may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Miss World 2010]] (Unplaced) [[Elite Model Look India|Elite Model Look India 2006]] (Winner}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alankrita Sahai may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| competitions = [[Miss Diva - 2014]] (Miss Diva Earth 2014} (Miss Perfect Body) (Miss Talent) (Miss Style Icon) [[Miss Earth
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:36, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elite Model Look India

The article Elite Model Look India has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

minor contents; no significiance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Elite Model Look India

added a link pointing to Gujrat

Femina Look of the Year

added a link pointing to Gujrat

Indian Princess

added a link pointing to Gujrat

Noyonita Lodh

added a link pointing to Indian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Himalaya Pageant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dharamshala. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Diva for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Diva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Diva until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 11:20, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Femina Miss India 2014

As I said on the article's talk page, I've removed irrelevant trivia for which no third-party sources exist. Since at least some of those trivia concern living persons, arguably the rather strict policy on biographies of living persons applies. While I'd welcome a beauty pageant expert to take a look at that article and improve it, re-adding those trivia, such as the order of announcements or the heights of the contestants, will not aid our readers' understanding of that particular pageant. If you think some of that content should be added to the article, please explain your rationale at the article's talk page. Huon (talk) 08:59, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Indians who won international beauty pageants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lansdowne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Gladrags Manhunt and Megamodel Contest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Abraham

List of Indians who won international beauty pageants (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Abraham

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Indians who won international beauty pageants, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Miss Diva - 2014. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Banner talk 14:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Miss Diva. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Banner talk 12:21, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Diva - 2014, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 16:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Miss Diva. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Banner talk 17:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miss Diva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Femina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Diva, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. The Banner talk 18:35, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Miss Diva, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. The Banner talk 12:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Gladrags Manhunt and Megamodel Contest. The Banner talk 12:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr United Nations India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr United Nations India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr United Nations India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 12:51, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Miss Progress India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Miss Progress India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Progress India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 12:56, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Diva

Miss Diva is not "your" article. WP:G7 only applies when the editor created the article is the only significant contributor. There are to many other contributors to delete this article that way. You can list it using either the WP:Prod or WP:AFD process. -- GB fan 10:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The reason you gave this time to delete the article is a reason to edit the article, not delete it. If you don't have the time or ability to fix the article don't worry about it. Someone will eventually come by and fix the article. As I said earlier, if you feel the article should be deleted you really have two options, WP:PROD or WP:AFD. Please click the links and see how to use those processes. -- GB fan 11:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I gave you bad advice. I missed that the article had been nominated at WP:AFD before. That act invalidates the use of WP:Prod. Your only option to would be to nominate it using WP:AFD. Some advice though, the reason you gave is not a reason to delete the article, it is a reason to edit the article and fix it. -- GB fan 11:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I completed your AFD nomination for this article before I saw this note. It is not your article, and there is no deadline - if you cannot get to it right away, other editors may. Deleting it would mean that they can't - or that they have to start a new article, from scratch, which isn't worthwhile when we already have the beginnings of one now. Regardless, per your request, there is a deletion debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Diva (2nd nomination). Please go there and explain why the article should be deleted. If you don't post a rationale within a day or so, the debate will be closed on a procedural basis, at my request. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article should be deleted because the neutrality of the article has been disputed and it has now become impossible to restore it moreover the article cite so many issues. Since past 1 year I have beem trying my best to make it issue free and neutral article but all the efforts went vain. Other users have also tried to improve the article to make it more reliable and encyclopedic but all their efforts also went vain for proof you can see the edit history. So its better that someone with better wikipedia knowledge and experience creates a new one from scratch for betterment of the users who are interested in the field of beauty pageants. At last its my humble request to delete this article as soon as possible for the betterment of the people who cannot get complete info.about the topic regarding this field from this article as the main/crucial info. Is missing from the page some other users have also tried to complete it but no effect was seen. Since past 1 year the article is at the sane stage where it was 1 year ago. So I would want to have it deleted for the sake of people who would not get any proper info. From it and let a more knowledgable and experienced user recreate it. Regards. Sky Groove (talk) 15:39, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. —SpacemanSpiff 13:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sky Groove (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

it is my humble request to the admin that please unblock me. I was blocked because of sock puppetry, something I had no idea about until I got blocked. I only contribute in the fields of modelling and pageantry. I created multiple accounts because I wanted to create articles of some specific model or pageant winner from one account and others from.a different one. I did it for my convienence. But eventually I lost the track and it all became hodge podge. But as you can see most of my wiki creations have been accepted. And I dont provide any false info. Or create any false article. I just write the facts that have a reference to support it. I do it as a leisure activity. So please unblock me I promise I will not commit this mistake again. Sock puppetry was something I did unknowingly. Now I really want to come back on wiki. I want to create articles on significant subjects related to.pageantry and modelling. Please please unblock me.Other accounts I used were Grovver Sky, Zack Martin 2000, Zeke Miguel and Lucas Spencer

Decline reason:

It's interesting to read, on more than one talk page, your claims to have used multiple accounts innocently, not knowing of the policy on sockpuppets. It may or may not be true that you did not know of that policy at the time when you first started using sockpuppets, but when you had had seven accounts blocked for sockpuppetry and you then went ahead and created another one, you knew full well what you were doing. Telling lies so blatant that the administrator reviewing your unblock request would have to be an idiot to believe them is not a good way to get unblocked. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:11, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sky Groove (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please list the other accounts you have used and are using. Another account of yours was just blocked a few days back. —SpacemanSpiff 04:09, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts I used were Groover Sky, Lucas Spencer, Zeke Miguel and Zack Martin 2000. Please unblock me afer I came to know about this block and sock puppetry I created only one account and have been editing and creating articles by it until now. I understood about the sock.puppetry it is evident from this fact and did not cause any vandalism in past after getting to know about wiki properly. Please please unblock me. I have to create more notable articles. Sky Groove (talk) 04:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you should be unblocked but as I have blocked or reviewed one of your socks in the past I will let another admin make that call. It is also disconcerting that you claim to have not been the cause of any disruption in the past when quite the opposite is true. —SpacemanSpiff 04:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I mentioned earlier that I am still learning and not much active on wiki. So I did not know whether I caused any disruption. But if you see my recent work I have improved a lot I think, so please please unblock me. Just give me one chance. I have come a long way since I started and all of us learn from our mistakes. And I learnt too. Please give me one chance. I did not take it seriously in past. But now I m pretty much serious. If i caused any disruption then I apolpgise about that. Give me one chance please. If you think I made any mistake then you can block me again. Atleast give me one chance. I just dont edit any random article. I have only edited articles related to modelling and pageantry. That pretty much describes my vision. Please please give me one chance. It takes a lot of time and efforts to create articles and seeing those articles being deleted after being reviwed makes me feel that all my efforts have gone vain. Please please give me one chance. I promise I will not cause any disruption again. Sky Groove (talk) 04:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Sky Groove (talk) 07:48, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You do not need to specifically request admin help like this - the unblock request is sufficient to bring it to the attention of admins who review such things. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou so much for replying. Sky Groove (talk) 10:37, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I really apologize for the disruption i caused in past as mentioned earlier I was still learning and was not familiar with norms of wiki. It feels really bad and heart wrenching to see my 11 articles who were successfully accepted being deleted for the sock puppetry which I caused unknowingly in past. But now i have come a long way since then and have improved a lot. It takes a lot of time and effort to create an article and losing 11 of your successful creations is a big deal I really really want to cone back please whosoever comes to this page kindly help me out in unblocking. I will be really grateful. I need to get unblocked as soon as possible as I have more articles to create. Please please try to understand my situation. Sky Groove (talk) 11:13, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what you mean by "I need to get unblocked as soon as possible as I have more articles to create. Please please try to understand my situation."? Is this part of your job requirement or a freelance project that you've taken up on behalf of someone? It's difficult to understand if you don't explain it.—SpacemanSpiff 15:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to spiff: Neither, the reason I wrote it because I am one of the very very few editors who have been contributing in the fields of Indian pageantry and modelling. It was something which was still not fully covered or there on wiki till I started doing it. A lot of notable subjects were there and I thought I should put them on wiki. And most of them got accepted thats how I started doing it. But the block got in my way. And I did prepare a few articles to publish before getting blocked besides investing so much time and effort in creating articles and seeing 11 of then deleted even after accpetance, it really kinda felt bad but its ok. I asked to get unblocked because i was having a good amount of time these days due to less work load so would love to contribute more as wiki is the easiest provides access to getting to know anything. Sky Groove (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sky Groove (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reply to the admin who just reviewed my request: I did not know about the unblock policy till my latest account got blocked. Secondanly if i were doing sockputtery intentionally and knew all about it I would have created more accounts after my previous accounts got blocked last year and would have continued to edit using newly created accounts. But did i do so no. I continued to contribute with a single account. Secondly If i were fully aware of sockputtery then i would not be using the same pattern of writing my articles and editing habits, I could have used a different style but did I do so, 'no. So if anyother admin wishes to review it kindly review it

Decline reason:

You say you did not know about the unblock policy. Presumably, you mean the sockpuppet policy. You try to provide evidence of this, but don't explain how you could possibly be unaware of the policy after being blocked for sockpuppetry in late 2015. No, it's very clear you knew exactly what you were doing. You had at least six accounts blocked for sockpuppetry and so set up a seventh account to get around your block, knowing full well what you were doing. Yamla (talk) 13:00, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sky Groove (talk) 19:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Sky Groove (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reply to admin who just reviewed my request: I knew about the sock puppetry thing a bit but Did not know that there was a way to get unblocked. I did not open this account until now. You can also check it on my latest account that I posted the unblock request there first and in response to that request an admin posted that I had to make the request here. If I would have known all about the way to get unblocked I could have made a request here in the first place but did I do that, NO. Besides if causing disruption or sock puttery would have been my prime objective then why would I have invested so much time and efforts in creating 11 or 12 wiki articles which have now been deleted. And why would I have posted them with a single account. I could have created multiple accounts like I did previously but did I do so, No. Moreover why would I be only creating articles related to the fields of pageantry and modelling if my prime objective was to cause disruption. I could have randomly picked up something but did I do so, No. And in my mind there was a difference in sockputtery and unblock policy. If some other admin wishes to investigate all the things I wrote then please do.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Reply to admin who just reviewed my request: I knew about the sock puppetry thing a bit but Did not know that there was a way to get unblocked. I did not open this account until now. You can also check it on my latest account that I posted the unblock request there first and in response to that request an admin posted that I had to make the request here. If I would have known all about the way to get unblocked I could have made a request here  in the first place but did I do that, '''NO'''. Besides if causing disruption or sock puttery would have been my prime objective then why would I have invested so much time and efforts in creating 11 or 12 wiki articles which have now been deleted. And why would I have posted them with a single account. I could have created multiple accounts like I did previously but did I do so, '''No'''. Moreover why would I be only creating articles related to the fields of pageantry and modelling if my prime objective was to cause disruption. I could have randomly picked up something but did I do so, '''No'''.
And in my mind there was a difference in sockputtery and unblock policy. If some other admin wishes to investigate all the things I wrote then please do. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Reply to admin who just reviewed my request: I knew about the sock puppetry thing a bit but Did not know that there was a way to get unblocked. I did not open this account until now. You can also check it on my latest account that I posted the unblock request there first and in response to that request an admin posted that I had to make the request here. If I would have known all about the way to get unblocked I could have made a request here  in the first place but did I do that, '''NO'''. Besides if causing disruption or sock puttery would have been my prime objective then why would I have invested so much time and efforts in creating 11 or 12 wiki articles which have now been deleted. And why would I have posted them with a single account. I could have created multiple accounts like I did previously but did I do so, '''No'''. Moreover why would I be only creating articles related to the fields of pageantry and modelling if my prime objective was to cause disruption. I could have randomly picked up something but did I do so, '''No'''.
And in my mind there was a difference in sockputtery and unblock policy. If some other admin wishes to investigate all the things I wrote then please do. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Reply to admin who just reviewed my request: I knew about the sock puppetry thing a bit but Did not know that there was a way to get unblocked. I did not open this account until now. You can also check it on my latest account that I posted the unblock request there first and in response to that request an admin posted that I had to make the request here. If I would have known all about the way to get unblocked I could have made a request here  in the first place but did I do that, '''NO'''. Besides if causing disruption or sock puttery would have been my prime objective then why would I have invested so much time and efforts in creating 11 or 12 wiki articles which have now been deleted. And why would I have posted them with a single account. I could have created multiple accounts like I did previously but did I do so, '''No'''. Moreover why would I be only creating articles related to the fields of pageantry and modelling if my prime objective was to cause disruption. I could have randomly picked up something but did I do so, '''No'''.
And in my mind there was a difference in sockputtery and unblock policy. If some other admin wishes to investigate all the things I wrote then please do. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Sky Groove (talk) 14:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eve's Weekly Miss India for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eve's Weekly Miss India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve's Weekly Miss India until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 404: / Line 404: @@
 [[User:Sky Groove|Sky Groove]] ([[User talk:Sky Groove#top|talk]]) 19:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
+{{unblock|Reply to admin who just reviewed my request: I knew about the sock puppetry thing a bit but Did not know that there was a way to get unblocked. I did not open this account until now. You can also check it on my latest account that I posted the unblock request there first and in response to that request an admin posted that I had to make the request here. If I would have known all about the way to get unblocked I could have made a request here  in the first place but did I do that, '''NO'''. Besides if causing disruption or sock puttery would have been my prime objective then why would I have invested so much time and efforts in creating 11 or 12 wiki articles which have now been deleted. And why would I have posted them with a single account. I could have created multiple accounts like I did previously but did I do so, '''No'''. Moreover why would I be only creating articles related to the fields of pageantry and modelling if my prime objective was to cause disruption. I could have randomly picked up something but did I do so, '''No'''.
+And in my mind there was a difference in sockputtery and unblock policy. If some other admin wishes to investigate all the things I wrote then please do.}}
+[[User:Sky Groove|Sky Groove]] ([[User talk:Sky Groove#top|talk]]) 14:57, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 == Nomination of [[:Eve's Weekly Miss India]] for deletion ==
 <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Eve's Weekly Miss India]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].