Jump to content

User talk:Tajotep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 173.66.2.216 (talk) at 17:51, 3 December 2018 (Mass reversions of Gaiseric to "Genseric"). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

A cartoon centipede reads books and types on a laptop.
The Wikipede and the Picture Tutorial. (image credit)

Welcome!

Hello, Tajotep, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Grayfell Grayfell (talk) 00:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Contents

Thanks

Hi Boleyn. Thanks a lot for reviewing my new pages. I come from eswiki, and policies are differente from there and here. How are mi two news articles? Aren't they bad, are them? Sorry if my English isn't fluently. Regards. Tajotep (talk) 21:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Tajotep, thank you for working on English Wikipedia as well. Your creations are good, I've been happy to review them. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi Lfstevens. Thanks for checking the copyedit of the two first articles I created (A cognitonibus and Ab epistulis). I'm Spanish so I sometimes commit grammar and orthography mistakes. Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Happy to do so. Cheers! Lfstevens (talk) 21:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple issues in Europa Press

Hi Crisco 1492. Some time ago (2011) you marked the page Europa Press like an article without sources. Now I'm contributing in the article and I added some references. Can you check it and eliminate that template? In particular, how can I correct the notabilty of the article? Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

  • Tajotep, notability isn't something you "correct". It's either there or it's not. For Europa Press, you'd need at least one (preferably more) reliable, independent source that deals with the subject in-depth. A contemporary newspaper profile, a chapter (or subchapter) in a biography on Reavey, or something similar. Just saying that something exists is not enough for notability.  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Modigliani

Hello Tajotep, in the article about "Modigliani" I have changed the name "Modigliani" in one case in "Amadeo Modigliani" because the sentence mentions the painter was the fourth child of his eltern and therefore the brother of several other children with the last name Modigliani. In the next sentence the form "Amadeo" is used, following the same logic. I believe, my change is justified and I would be pleased if you would allow me this small alteration. In case you have a good reason for using "Modigliani" without the first name, I would be grateful if you could explain this to me.Opzwartbeek (talk) 22:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's my error. I've just looked quickly and I observed which all paragraphs start in "Modigliani", so I supposed that your edit wasn't necessary, but when you left the message I read the info in the section and I realised I was wrong. Sorry for that. Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Labordeta (talkcontribs)

Your reversions of User:CEpley

I have reverted some of these, and may do more. I have also messaged his talk - he is adding too many books, and making other mistakes. But I don't think his edits amount to WP:BOOKSPAM - these are just the sort of books FR should have, just rather a lot of them. Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and thanks for checking my contributions. I'm new on enwiki and I can commit some mistakes. Recently my contribution on "Etruscan history" has been reverted. Since you didn't revert it, I ask you... It's a good edition, or that user is right?. Same to you. Tajotep (talk) 18:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
I commented at [[1]] on problems with his edits, but on the whole I think they are better there than not there at all. I'm working through adjusting them somewhat, without having personal knowledge of all these works. that there too. Johnbod (talk) 18:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Socrates

The reason why all the years are included is because different sources show different years for birth, which indicates the sources don't agree, which necessitates inclusion of all the years shown by sources, since there isn't agreement. Your criticism, reiterative, is not the correct choice because, if you would like to verify for yourself, the definition of the word you used does not apply to difference but instead to the same thing repeated - [2], [3]. This would therefore allow me to return your edit to the previous version. 23h112e (talk) 20:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted some part of your edition because if you add three times (at the top of the article, in the infobox person and in the section of "Early years") it's redundant. I never doubt the references, so I added it again. If you want to discuss anything, you can write on the talk. Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 11:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Labordeta (talkcontribs)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Talavera de la Reina (1936), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Año/Cero for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Año/Cero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Año/Cero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 23:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Fioretta Gorini) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Fioretta Gorini, Tajotep!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I have made some minor improvements. Please see the article history and diffs for details.

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Bianca Riario (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Rizzoli
Giovanni dalle Bande Nere (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Giovanni Cavalcanti
Medjay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to National police

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Law vs. Billy the Kid, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Griffin and Bill Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Information icon Hello, I'm SteveMcCluskey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Mexican inventions and discoveries have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have added links to the phrase "first civilization", which redirects to the article Cradle of civilization, in many articles, which is inappropriate when it merely refers to the "first civilization to...." Would you please edit more selectively in the future and remove the many inappropriate edits that you have made. SteveMcCluskey (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On my talk page you said:
I don't find them inappropiate. "First civilization" is a term, and it doesn't matter where it's accompanied by. In addition, some of the words I linked redirected to "civilization", so I linked to "first civilization". Tajotep (talk) 10:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As the Wikipedia Maual of Style makes clear, links are intended to "provide instant pathways to locations … that are likely to increase readers' understanding of the topic at hand." More specifically, it notes that editors should "beware of linking to an article without first confirming that it is helpful in context."
A link from Alpha Centauri in fiction to "First civilization" does not link to an article that is helpful in understanding "the first civilization to send a colony ship to the Alpha Centauri system." It would be tiresome to give other examples of inappropriate links from your list of contriburions. Please stop this practice of thoughtless editing. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 02:36, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The link to First civilization is indeed misleading in the given context. Talking about the "the first civilization of all civilizations in the game, that does something" is not the same as talking about "The first civilization" here on Earth in particular. Mere fact that words "a" and "b" appear next to each other doesn't mean they should be automatically linked to an "a b" article. It would be sensible to unlink that. Martinjanda (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here is an alternative statement that should help to understand the context: "One of the potential victory conditions involves being the third civilization to discover electricity.". Such statements have nothing to do with the First civilization. Also, being familiar with the game helps to understand the difference. Martinjanda (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tajotep. You have new messages at Talk:Beauty and the Beast (2017 film).
Message added 01:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shearonink (talk) 01:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, just 17.37% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
  • Our priorities for January:

[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/64|Prisoners]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/65|Fashion designers]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/66|Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for adding your name to the WiR mailing list. If you want to become a full member of the project, you should register using "Join WikiProject" in the box on the right hand corner of the main WiR page.--Ipigott (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And thank for finally deciding to become a member. If ever you need any assistance or run into any problems, please let me know or post a message on the WiR talk page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Monro (British Army officer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"foolishness"

Wikipedia aims to be encyclopedic and its Manual of Style guidelines help it to fulfil that function and avoid becoming a fan site. If you are not prepared to abide by them, you run the risk of having your editing account blocked. Bring the matter up in the Ballerina (2016 film) talk page and I'll make sure an administrator is there to comment. Sweetpool50 (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Islamophobia

The tags cannot be removed until the concerns are addressed. What part do you not understand? see Talk:Islamophobia#"...especially when seen as a geopolitical force or the source of terrorism" Al-Andalusi (talk) 19:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feburary 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/67|"Black women"]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/68|"Mathematicians and statisticians"]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/69|"Geofocus: Island women"]]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Captain Phillip a "survival" thriller?

Hi Tajotep. Do you really consider this movie a survival film? Please check/comment/join our discussion with some valuable arguments. Thanks. [[4]] Syncrow (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reversing an edit

How are you going to revert information off of the EMD MP15DC article that I wrote? I work for the railroad and know more about these Locomotives than anyone else on here. If you don't believe what I wrote. Look it up for yourself. DudleyJJenkins409 (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Tajotep! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 11:07, Sunday, February 4, 2018 (UTC)

Athena Parthenos

Pardon, but may I ask why you reverted my edit on the Athena Parthenos? The cited article itself uses "26 cubits", which is also what was noticed by Pliny the Elder (according to Mary Beard's The Parthenon, page 40); 26 cubits is also exactly 39 feet. Reversinator (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why you're replacing external links to the IMDb with archived versions? This prevents people from seeing the latest version of the page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with this? It's just adding an additional fact covered in an existing reference.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry—apologies. More on article talk page. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about franchise

I'm so sorry about franchises! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.77.116.78 (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.


Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative. [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/70|Women's History Month 2018]]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hercules

Talk about what? All of the Hercules episodes are underdeveloped, overwritten plot summarries without an ounce of real-life world information, lacking any significance or citations. All of these things I just wrote have been written at the top of those articles since 2011. They don't need a discussion. It's a pretty non-controversial merge & redirect. PanagiotisZois (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sharp-Shooting Twin Sisters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Conroy and Guillermo Méndez
Ricardo Palacios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to James Hill

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sharp-Shooting Twin Sisters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to William Conroy and Guillermo Méndez
Yginio Salazar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Lincoln Cemetery

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

minecraft: story mode

why do you prefer aired if it wasn't broadcasted on television?204.153.155.151 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Escuela de rateros, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mario García and Jesús Gómez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valentino Macchi

Hi there, I'm an italian user. I have removed the pic of Macchi you put in his WP pages in italian, french and english. That man is not Macchi at all... you can easily find Macchi on google images, btw he was much younger at that time. Bye --Vergerus (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, that man you posted is NOT Valentino Macchi at all. Did you check on google images, at least? --Vergerus (talk) 13:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, yes, that man on pollanetsquad page is Macchi, when he was 30 y.o. I think. Cheers --Vergerus (talk) 08:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tonic

Hello. Ive fixed the copyright issue by sending proof of copyright ownership to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. In the following email generated by the WIKI permissions email generator:

I hereby affirm that I, Tonic, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tonicbandshot.jpg. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Tonic 2018-03-24

[generated using relgen] — Preceding unsigned comment added by TonicWiki (talkcontribs) 15:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Earls of Orford

The removal of my edit has removed much relevant information from the page Earl of Orford, Edward Russell 1st Earl of Orford already has another page with links, this page is generic for all the Earls and you have deleted all their links. Please reinstate. Prawnmob200 (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons.


Focus on: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/71|April+Further with Art+Feminism]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Meetup/72|Archaeology]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Meetup/73|Military history (contest)]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Meetup/74|Geofocus: Indian subcontinent]]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred --Rosiestep (talk) 12:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Content removal from talk pages

Just leaving you an FYI that users are allowed to freely remove warnings from their own talk pages. It is allowed. Let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cite journal

Hey there, judging by recent edits of yours to various Lego video games, you really like to use the {{cite journal}} te plate for citations. Quite interestingly, as it is one of the less commonly used ones. However, I sceptical whether the template is appropriate for content that is displayed online (not in a journal), especially when there is no printed counterpart (e.g. the IGN source you changed on Lego The Incredibles just now). The rendering might not be very different (if different at all), but for alignment's sake, please consider using {{cite web}} for such sources in the future. Cheers! Lordtobi () 22:29, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Order of Charles III recipients

Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page List of Order of Charles III recipients to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you.

Bienvenido, y gracias por contribuir a la página List of Order of Charles III recipients de Wikipedia. Aunque añadió la página a la versión en inglés de la Wikipedia, el artículo no está en inglés. Le invitamos a traducirlo al inglés. En la actualidad, ha sido incluida en las páginas que necesitan traducción , pero si no se traduce en dos semanas, el artículo será incluido para su eliminación. Gracias. wbm1058 (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cook (dog)

Hello Tajotep,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cook (dog) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

EROS message 02:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sociedad Limitada listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sociedad Limitada. Since you had some involvement with the Sociedad Limitada redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Ammarpad (talk) 04:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalities

Catalan and Basque are nationalities. The 1978 Spanish Constitution states "The Constitution is based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish Nation, the common and indivisible homeland of all Spaniards; it recognizes and guarantees the right to self-government of the nationalities and regions of which it is composed and the solidarity among them all."

Now please stop peddling that falsehood. There's no reason for you to object to these changes unless you have a sinister political motive.ApolloCarmb (talk) 08:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts on Hypercorrection

Hello, Tajotep. I have left a warning for IP User talk:5.41.185.76 not to violate the three-revert rule. They already have reverted multiple times, so if a user from that IP changes the page again without discussion, you may want to bring the edits to the attention of WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.

You may also want to take care, though, not to violate the rule yourself. In the past I have seen well-intended editors get in trouble for violating the letter of that rule, even when they were acting for the best interests of the project. Thank you for your contributions, and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
File:Soraya Aghaee4.jpg



New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/75|"Women of the Sea"]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/76|"Villains"]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/77|"Women in Sports"]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/78|"Central Eastern European women"]]


Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Wiki Loves Food

Curd Rice
Curd Rice

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Film scores by Spanish composer has been nominated for discussion

Category:Film scores by Spanish composer, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 13:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Disney had released a press release and no actor was established playing Roo. At this point we can’t 100% authenticate who’s playing the character as Disney has yet to announce it. Rusted AutoParts 14:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miguel Blesa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gürtel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aristotle

Please motivate your choice when you undo section. Plato alone is not "one of the most important philosophers of the Western Tradition". In terms of impact and number of studies, Aristotle and Aristotelianism outperform any Platonic tradition by a great deal. At the very least, therefore, it is right to say that they were both very influential. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristotele1982 (talkcontribs) 20:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mimmo Poli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giorgio Bianchi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Hateful Eight

This is, in my opinion, WP:UNDUE for this page, if you want to have this information published, I'm all for it, but you really think it needs to be on every page with his name ? Put it here Harvey Weinstein and be done with it. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 01:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Ninurta edit

The IP user you reverted was correct; the relief of the bird-headed figure is definitely not Ninurta and I have no idea how it came to be identified as him here on Wikipedia, since that erroneous identification is not found anywhere else to my knowledge. I have replaced it with an image of a relief from Ninurta's temple at Kalhu that almost definitely really depicts him and have provided a citation in the caption underneath the image to a reliable, scholarly source explaining this. --Katolophyromai (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thunderbolt image

Hi Tajotep, thanks for getting in touch. As far as I can tell, it is a photo of Thunderbolt. It has been reproduced in reliable sources as Thunderbolt (eg 1, 2, 3), and given that Westwood died in 1846, it is highly unlikely to be him since photography was still in its infancy. It would seem the filename and details over at Wiki Commons will have to be corrected. - HappyWaldo (talk) 12:32, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jews in Spain

In my review about Spain's religion I added that Spain was granting Spanish citizenship to Sephardic Jews who could prove to have their ancestors in Spain. You erased this sentence because I didn’t add the link. Here it is. Unfortunedly I don’t know how to do it. Could you please do it for me? Muito obrigado. Ibn Gabirol

https://elpais.com/elpais/2016/01/22/inenglish/1453467510_159674.html Ibn Gabirol (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Diadumenian

Hi, I saw your edit on Diadumenian so this is my account. I started a convo on talk page so you kind discussing there? PrinceofFrancia (talk) 00:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aitana and Vicente

The article says "[...] it is said they broke up on March", that is the definition of speculation. Anyway, why is Vicente relevant? We do not even know his last name. Why is Aitana's teenage relationship with a guy named Vicente encyclopedically relevant? How is the fact that she unfollowed some guy on Instagram encyclopedically relevant? Sar2de (talk) 16:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reworked the wording based on what your response and moved the piece of information to a new "Personal life" section. Sorry if I caused you disturbance, we can open the discussion on the talk page if you have further concern over this issue. Sar2de (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red June Editathons

Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons.



New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/79|WiR Loves Pride]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/80|Singers and Songwriters]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/81|Women in GLAM]]

New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/82|Geofocus: Russia/USSR]]


Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

May 2018

Information icon Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sergio Ramos. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jean Charles Davillier

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Tajotep, thanks for creating Jean Charles Davillier!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This looks potentially interesting. Please expand this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate Revert

Hi, Re:[5]. This revision was properly inappropriate. Because Sonu Ke Titu Ki Sweety flim is not a science fiction film or Robot film. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 07:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noel G. listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Noel G.. Since you had some involvement with the Noel G. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Onel5969 TT me 23:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Portugal,

please, the display of the links was fine as it was. For example, when you wikilink Mundo Deportivo one time, no need to do it again.

Thank you. --Quite A Character (talk) 21:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notbroken

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matthew_Perryman_Jones&curid=6834723&diff=847517265&oldid=821709613 WP:NOTBROKEN. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry, I just removed your recent addition as it was added to the 'Kits and crest' section so wasn't relevant. Perhaps this would be better suited to the History of the Argentina national football team article? Nzd (talk) 17:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in study

Hello,

I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.

Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018 at Women in Red

Hello again from Women in Red!


July 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/83|Sub-Saharan Africa]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/84|Film + stage]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/85|20th-century]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/86|Women Rock]]
Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00|Notable women, broadly-construed!]]


Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, Tajotep. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Luis Cepeda, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Cepeda moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Luis Cepeda, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Arno Dorian.png

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Arno Dorian.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 18:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tajotep. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Leonora Summers, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 TT me 12:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Frank Kesson

Hi, I'm Onel5969. Tajotep, thanks for creating Frank Kesson!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be nice to have a filmography for this cinematographer.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Onel5969 TT me 12:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Flirty Four-Flushers) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Flirty Four-Flushers, Tajotep!

Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article about this silent film. If you're going to create articles about films/people from early cinema, you might want to check out: http://mediahistoryproject.org/collections/ -- it's a great resource, although it can be a bit time consuming.

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Onel5969 TT me 12:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (May Boley) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating May Boley, Tajotep!

Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Very nice job on this article. Keep it up.

To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Onel5969 TT me 01:02, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Kesson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page How I Play Golf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tom O'Brien (actor, born 1890)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Tom O'Brien (actor, born 1890), Tajotep!

Wikipedia editor In Memoriam A.H.H. just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work on the article! However you should include a biography about O'Brien in order to get it off stub class. Good work!

To reply, leave a comment on In Memoriam A.H.H.'s talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

In Memoriam A.H.H.What, you egg?. 12:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Leonora Summers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonora Summers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonora Summers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hippodrome of Berytus

Sorry, but we seem to have had an edit conflict, and my resolution of the same has inadvertently undone most (if not all) your work in the "History" section (that's the only section I've edited). Regards, Haploidavey (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2018 (UTC)done[reply]

OK, thanks for the note. The Wiki is unbreakable! Haploidavey (talk) 02:02, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of suicides in the 21st century, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Williamsburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines

Information icon Hello, Tajotep. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Chilton Company, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

While you haven't edited the Chilton Company article itself, you've added dozens of wikilinks to it from other articles. This is fairly unusual, and caught my attention. If you have any connection with the Chilton Company, please disclose it. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 02:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018 at Women in Red

An exciting new month for Women in Red!


August 2018 worldwide online editathons:
New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/87|Indigenous women]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/88|Women of marginalized populations]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/89|Women writers]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/90|Geofocus: Bottom 10]]
Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative
Notable women, broadly-construed!
]]



For the first time, this month we are trying out our Monthly achievement initiative

  • All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
  • It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in August.
  • Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Şahkulu

Referring to your edit;

1) He was a Turkmen, not an Azerbaijani.
2) The Latin Azerbaijani script didn't exist at the time (anachronism).
3) It was added by a drive-by IP without any explanation/edit summary in 2016.[6]
- LouisAragon (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Roscoe "Rustling Bob" Bryant) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Roscoe "Rustling Bob" Bryant, Tajotep!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your new article on Roscoe "Rustling Bob" Bryant.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:52, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018 at Women in Red

September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!



New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/91|Women currently in academics]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/92|Women + Law]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/93|Geofocus: Hispanic countries]]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

Check it out: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Monthly achievement initiative: September 2018|Monthly achievement initiative]]

  • All creators of new biographies can keep track of their progress and earn virtual awards.
  • It can be used in conjunction with the above editathons or for any women's biography created in September.
  • Try it out when you create your first biography of the month.

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Pointless reverting

Exactly why did you do this? 146.90.125.77 (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of Order of Charles III recipients, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Michael Copeman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable actor lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Fails WP:ENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 03:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Copeman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Copeman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Copeman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 13:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited El País, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Podemos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just clearing up a recent edit...

I recently noticed that you undid two edits I did to the Incredibles 2 page (one of which was to restore plot fixes I accidentally reverted from the first one). According to WP:FILMLEAD, the lead states that the primary genre and/or sub-genre can be used, and animation is really more of a format than an actual genre. As for the AllMovie link, it was the only one I could find that properly identified the genre. Just wanted to clear things up regarding my edits. IceWalrus236 (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tajotep, I noticed you reverted a fixed link to an article "Why do cats purr?" on a page about Purr to a previous dead link. The link I provided is currently working for me. Was it intentional? Martinjanda (talk) 21:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Foreshortening redirect

Hi. The redirect you edited, Foreshortening, points to Perspective (graphical)#Foreshortening. There isn't enough info to make Foreshortening its own article, so please edit the target section instead of the redirect.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  16:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virgilio Fossati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montefalcone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of suicides

Hi. Thanks for adding a citation for Jason Hairston. Just so you know, though, I removed the method of suicide, because it isn't mentioned in the cited source, and mistakenly attributed that info to you in my edit summary. Only now do I see it was added by User:73.223.15.78. Sorry about that. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source, The New Encyclopedia of Islam, by Cyril Glassé, page 129, "The conscription system used by the Ottomans. It consisted of taking male children from subject Christian populations, chiefly in the Balkans, forcibly converting them to Islam, and raising them to join the ranks of an elite military corps, the Jannissaries..." --Kansas Bear (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was changed to "willingfully" by User:Cybertroopers.[7] --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018 at Women in Red

Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!



New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/94|Clubs]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/95|Science fiction + fantasy]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/96|STEM]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/97|The Mediterranean]]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Undo please

Before you undo something talk to me first why l removed them in the beginning. I removed the references because they are errors. It was l who wrote them in the beginning, and now it shows error on the references.

//Nemrud91

Modern Archaeology

Hi, modern archaeology redirects to Contemporary archaeology which "is a field of archaeological research that focuses on the most recent (20th and 21st century) past". In almost all cases this is not what is meant by "modern archaeology", which typically refers to modern archaeological techniques. I have reverted a few of your changes to incorrectly link to modern archaeology, but as you have made so many changes please could you revert the rest of your changes yourself. Thanks. BabelStone (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting the "Snoke" edit

When I edited that item, I checked the reference....the Wiki article was missing the end parenthesis that was in the reference. I was putting it. Never will there be a beginning parenthesis, without an end one. Not in English, anyways. Hockeycowboy (talk) 03:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EMENDATION: When I edited that item, I checked the reference....the Wiki article was missing the end parenthesis that was in the reference. I was putting it **back in**. Never will there be a beginning parenthesis, without an end one. Not in English, anyways. Hockeycowboy (talk) 03:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC) Hockeycowboy (talk) 03:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assassin's Creed Odyssey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Get ready for November with Women in Red!

Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives



New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/98|Religion]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/99|Deceased politicians]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/96|Asia]]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Please read it, and follow it. Johnbod (talk) 02:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Red Dead Redemption 2: difference about favorite (U.S.) / favourite (U.K.) spelling

Hello Tajotep,

My edit on Red Dead Redemption 2 had been done because the article is specifically written in American English which it has own words, as indicated on its talk page.

On Wikipedia, every article has own spelling conventions. For example, for British related topics, they are written in British English, and for Indian related topics, written in Indian English. Please read this article, in case if you didn't know that.

Regards, --176.137.222.240 (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.
I've noticed your contributions to articles related musicians from Spain and thought you might be interested. Erick (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

More than a plot

Hi Tajotep, I seem to be moving uphill with this, but the content I removed was far more than a plot description [8]. It includes the writer's intent and reason for cancellation. Thank you, 2601:188:180:1481:E08B:61B7:5650:EA7E (talk) 17:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lopetegui

Hey, he is not sacked yet. He was active at the training session today. Kante4 (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is why we wait for official sources. And that edit was way too detalied. Kante4 (talk) 16:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To Tajotep

I am politely asking you to stop undoing my constructive edits without rhyme or reason. It seems to me like deliberate antagonism on your part (why would you otherwise also undo my DuckTales edit out of the blue) and if you keep this up I'll report you for edit warring. Thanks. 186.31.11.33 (talk) 23:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tajotep. Unfortunately I had to remove the plot section from the above article, as it's a match for the content at http://natgeotv.com/in/da-vinci-s-demons/about. I have also removed this and several other plot summaries from List of Da Vinci's Demons episodes as they're copyright and thus not available for us to copy. Sorry, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced birth dates

Please don't add unsourced birth dates, as you did in this edit. Since you didn't cite your source, I don't know where you're getting your information from. But if it's the IMDb, please be aware that this is not a reliable source. Nor is filmreference.com, another commonly cited website for actors. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To Tajotep, again

If you want to discuss this and explain your unconstructive, vandalizing behaviour, I refer you to Clementine's talk page to hash this out. Thanks. 186.31.190.188 (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Victims of the White Terror

This article presupposes that any of us have a clue what the White Terror was. We don't have a clue. Please write an introductory paragraph which provides a context for the remainder of the article. In general, all articles should be written based on the presumption that the reader does not know the subject area; the article should explain the subject to the user. thx. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:02, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tajotep. That's very much better; and I appreciate that sometimes you have to leave an article half-done because of a shortage of time. Thank you for your work.
I have a copy of 'The Spanish Civil War' by Hugh Thomas, which seems to be the (English language) definitive text, on my bookshelf, but I confess I have yet to make much headway through it. Must do so; such a fascinating and sad epoch of history with - again sadly - so much contemporary resonance. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tajotep. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018 at Women in Red

The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.



New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/101|Photography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/102|Laureates]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/103|Countries beginning with 'I']]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Rosiestep (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
[reply]

December 2018 at Women in Red

The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.



New: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/101|Photography]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/102|Laureates]] [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/103|Countries beginning with 'I']]

Continuing: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/00/2018|#1day1woman Global Initiative]]

Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
[reply]

Hello, Tajotep,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jacqueline Cantrelle, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept, either in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. At any case, please consider improving the page to address the issues raised or it may be deleted later anyway.

If you have any questions, leave a comment here and ping me.

Onel5969 TT me 14:06, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mass reversions of Gaiseric to "Genseric"

Hi,

At my suggestion, the Gaiseric article is now at Gaiseric (instead of Genseric). Since it is my responsibility to make sure wikilinks point to the correct article, and since Gaiseric is the most common name in recent scholarly sources, I have tried to fix some of the articles which refer to "Genseric" and wl there. Why are you mass reverting these fixes? If you disagree with the name change, please explain on talk:Gaiseric. 173.66.2.216 (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I see you have also changed all references to Gaiseric, on Gaiseric, back to Genseric. 173.66.2.216 (talk)