User talk:SPACKlick: Difference between revisions
dablink notification message (see the FAQ) |
|||
Line 477: | Line 477: | ||
::::: I saw only one editor making [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]. I apologise if you feel it was an insult but I saw one pending edit, accepted the edit but posted a note to your talk page because that edit and one previous that caught my eye had nasty edit summaries. Following your message here I looked into the history of it and have mentioned to the other editors involved that they ought to be discussing on a talk page, that they ought not to edit war and have raised the matter at the project cycling board. I'm not sure which step in this you think was unreasonable. I would recommend stepping back, calming down and hopefully you'll see there's been no attack. Now to move this forward, I would recommend bringing the case that David Kinjah meets [[WP:GNG]] to the cycling board. [[User:SPACKlick|SPACKlick]] ([[User talk:SPACKlick#top|talk]]) 13:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC) |
::::: I saw only one editor making [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]. I apologise if you feel it was an insult but I saw one pending edit, accepted the edit but posted a note to your talk page because that edit and one previous that caught my eye had nasty edit summaries. Following your message here I looked into the history of it and have mentioned to the other editors involved that they ought to be discussing on a talk page, that they ought not to edit war and have raised the matter at the project cycling board. I'm not sure which step in this you think was unreasonable. I would recommend stepping back, calming down and hopefully you'll see there's been no attack. Now to move this forward, I would recommend bringing the case that David Kinjah meets [[WP:GNG]] to the cycling board. [[User:SPACKlick|SPACKlick]] ([[User talk:SPACKlick#top|talk]]) 13:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
::::::See [[Non-apology]]. You are not sure which step was unreasonable? How about the step where you blundered into a situation you hadn't bothered to research, and left a form letter to lie about me on my talk page? [[Special:Contributions/179.210.105.123|179.210.105.123]] ([[User talk:179.210.105.123|talk]]) 23:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC) |
::::::See [[Non-apology]]. You are not sure which step was unreasonable? How about the step where you blundered into a situation you hadn't bothered to research, and left a form letter to lie about me on my talk page? [[Special:Contributions/179.210.105.123|179.210.105.123]] ([[User talk:179.210.105.123|talk]]) 23:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
::::::: I'm aware it was a non-apology. I have already said the template was imperfect, however you had made unhelpful edits, by their edit summaries, so it wasn't inappropriate. If you don't take talk messages personally and don't jump to ranting and playing the victim on other people's talk pages maybe you'll develop as an editor, work better collaboratively. Anyway, I'm done with this. I tried to be nice, I tried to get the ball moving towards dispute resolution. If you just wanna be angry at people please do it elsewhere. [[User:SPACKlick|SPACKlick]] ([[User talk:SPACKlick#top|talk]]) 07:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC) |
::::::: I'm aware it was a non-apology. I have already said the template was imperfect, however you had made unhelpful edits, by their edit summaries, so it wasn't inappropriate. If you don't take talk messages personally and don't jump to ranting and playing the victim on other people's talk pages maybe you'll develop as an editor, work better collaboratively. Anyway, I'm done with this. I tried to be nice, I tried to get the ball moving towards dispute resolution. If you just wanna be angry at people please do it elsewhere. [[User:SPACKlick|SPACKlick]] ([[User talk:SPACKlick#top|talk]]) 07:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
::::::::you didn't try to "be nice". You deliberately weren't. You left a dishonest template to attack me for making a clearly described edit while encouraging the person reverting for '''no reason'''. If a template doesn't say what you want to say, '''don't use the template.''' If you don't want to be insulting, '''don't lie with a template''' and '''don't make pretend apologies'''. You approved of personal attacks and unexplained reverts but attacked me. You're a disgrace to the encyclopaedia and you should be ashamed of yourself. [[Special:Contributions/179.210.105.123|179.210.105.123]] ([[User talk:179.210.105.123|talk]]) 13:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
=RFC's= |
=RFC's= |
Revision as of 13:28, 24 July 2015
I hat discussions that I believe have finished, please feel free to turn them back into active discussions where needed.
Older Discussions
2012 x2
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
2014 x25
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2015 x 19
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May x 1
| ||
---|---|---|
|
June x 1
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Current Discussions
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
|
---|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. QuackGuru (talk) 03:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
Notice that you are now subject to a community sanction
|
---|
The following sanction has been imposed on you:
You have been sanctioned because of your disruptive image removals on Electronic cigarette in the face of apparent consensus. This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator as authorised by the community's decision at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Electronic cigarettes, and the procedure described by the general sanctions guidelines. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. You may appeal this sanction at the administrators' noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. —Darkwind (talk) 09:18, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
|
July 2015 [Civility notice re:Quack]
|
---|
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a comment on the page talk:Chemicals in electronic cigarette aerosol that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
|
Edit warring at Electronic cigarette aerosol [Quack RE: non-specific]
|
---|
At the Electronic cigarette aerosol page you are currently engaging in edit war. QuackGuru (talk) 20:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
|
Stop spamming [CFCF re:e-cigs]
|
---|
Please refrain from posting on my talk page with copied messages that bear no connection to the actions undertaken. I do not want to be spammed. Consensus is not created through:
Drowning out others with more words or more messages isn't going to win you the discussion. I have made my point and it is clear in the talk page, so is the point of several other editors. Churning your dislike over and over again is just a waste of time. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 17:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
There is clearly no consensus for inclusion, that has clearly not been spammed by one user. Get over yourself and edit per consensus and policy rather than your POV. You have made NO point on the talk page, your one post, in full is |
hi [Ozzie10aaaa re:CFCF at AN:EW]
I don't know you or why you helped, but if you ever need a hand my door is open to you, thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
- I had been looking at this problem with this user on the page I pointed to and Domestic violence against men and been considering reporting, when I saw their name had already come up I figured I had to add. that said, I don't think your original report does constitute an edit war, but there may be some not listening on CFCF's part, I haven't looked in detail - SPACKlick (talk) 09:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- I thank you , in any event, sincerly--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:19, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Misused template
What exactly made you feel it necessary to leave me a message accusing me of making "unhelpful edits"? 179.210.105.123 (talk) 12:23, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, that template may not have been quite the right fit, however it was close. Leaving personal attacks, such as you have done at Chris Froome in edit summary's is unhelpful, calling others edits pointless in edit summaries is uncivil, lacks good faith and is also unhelpful. The reason I left the message was to say "Welcome to wikipedia, play nice." So play nice. I'd recommend taking the RedLink to David Kinjah to the talk page before the dispute becomes an edit war.SPACKlick (talk) 12:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- The template was an insult. It was a personal attack against me for making a clearly described sensible edit. Your implicit support for the editor who is repeatedly and disruptively reverting the change with no explanation at all is quite disgusting. 179.210.105.123 (talk) 12:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- No insult was intended and no attack was made. As can be seen from the fact that I advised all parties to stop reverting and discuss, and accepted your pending edit, I have not supported the reverting editor. I have also counselled that editor that their behaviour is likely leading to an edit war and dispute resolution steps should be attempted before further mainspace edits are made. Please try not to take talk page notices personally, they are advisories, usually on methods rather than contents. SPACKlick (talk) 13:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Whatever you intended, it was an insult and an attack. You have left no messages on the other user's talk page. Your intervention is entirely one sided.179.210.105.123 (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- I saw only one editor making personal attacks. I apologise if you feel it was an insult but I saw one pending edit, accepted the edit but posted a note to your talk page because that edit and one previous that caught my eye had nasty edit summaries. Following your message here I looked into the history of it and have mentioned to the other editors involved that they ought to be discussing on a talk page, that they ought not to edit war and have raised the matter at the project cycling board. I'm not sure which step in this you think was unreasonable. I would recommend stepping back, calming down and hopefully you'll see there's been no attack. Now to move this forward, I would recommend bringing the case that David Kinjah meets WP:GNG to the cycling board. SPACKlick (talk) 13:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- See Non-apology. You are not sure which step was unreasonable? How about the step where you blundered into a situation you hadn't bothered to research, and left a form letter to lie about me on my talk page? 179.210.105.123 (talk) 23:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm aware it was a non-apology. I have already said the template was imperfect, however you had made unhelpful edits, by their edit summaries, so it wasn't inappropriate. If you don't take talk messages personally and don't jump to ranting and playing the victim on other people's talk pages maybe you'll develop as an editor, work better collaboratively. Anyway, I'm done with this. I tried to be nice, I tried to get the ball moving towards dispute resolution. If you just wanna be angry at people please do it elsewhere. SPACKlick (talk) 07:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- you didn't try to "be nice". You deliberately weren't. You left a dishonest template to attack me for making a clearly described edit while encouraging the person reverting for no reason. If a template doesn't say what you want to say, don't use the template. If you don't want to be insulting, don't lie with a template and don't make pretend apologies. You approved of personal attacks and unexplained reverts but attacked me. You're a disgrace to the encyclopaedia and you should be ashamed of yourself. 179.210.105.123 (talk) 13:28, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- I'm aware it was a non-apology. I have already said the template was imperfect, however you had made unhelpful edits, by their edit summaries, so it wasn't inappropriate. If you don't take talk messages personally and don't jump to ranting and playing the victim on other people's talk pages maybe you'll develop as an editor, work better collaboratively. Anyway, I'm done with this. I tried to be nice, I tried to get the ball moving towards dispute resolution. If you just wanna be angry at people please do it elsewhere. SPACKlick (talk) 07:57, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- See Non-apology. You are not sure which step was unreasonable? How about the step where you blundered into a situation you hadn't bothered to research, and left a form letter to lie about me on my talk page? 179.210.105.123 (talk) 23:53, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- I saw only one editor making personal attacks. I apologise if you feel it was an insult but I saw one pending edit, accepted the edit but posted a note to your talk page because that edit and one previous that caught my eye had nasty edit summaries. Following your message here I looked into the history of it and have mentioned to the other editors involved that they ought to be discussing on a talk page, that they ought not to edit war and have raised the matter at the project cycling board. I'm not sure which step in this you think was unreasonable. I would recommend stepping back, calming down and hopefully you'll see there's been no attack. Now to move this forward, I would recommend bringing the case that David Kinjah meets WP:GNG to the cycling board. SPACKlick (talk) 13:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Whatever you intended, it was an insult and an attack. You have left no messages on the other user's talk page. Your intervention is entirely one sided.179.210.105.123 (talk) 13:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- No insult was intended and no attack was made. As can be seen from the fact that I advised all parties to stop reverting and discuss, and accepted your pending edit, I have not supported the reverting editor. I have also counselled that editor that their behaviour is likely leading to an edit war and dispute resolution steps should be attempted before further mainspace edits are made. Please try not to take talk page notices personally, they are advisories, usually on methods rather than contents. SPACKlick (talk) 13:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- The template was an insult. It was a personal attack against me for making a clearly described sensible edit. Your implicit support for the editor who is repeatedly and disruptively reverting the change with no explanation at all is quite disgusting. 179.210.105.123 (talk) 12:50, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
RFC's
2014
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
January 2015
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
February 2015
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
April 2015
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
May 2015
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
June 2015
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tony Abbott. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2015 (UTC) |
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Copyfraud. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2015 (UTC) |
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC) |
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Same-sex marriage in the Pitcairn Islands. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC) |
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Dennis Hastert. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2015 (UTC) |
Thefeedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blazing Saddles. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of forestry journals. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chemicals in electronic cigarette aerosol. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 8 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Brian Leiter. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 9 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Derry. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political positions of Jeb Bush. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bias in reporting on North Korea by Western news media. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Veganism. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Microsoft Surface. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carlos Latuff. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 16 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Infinite monkey theorem. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 19 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Comparison of Asian national space programs. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Greek government-debt crisis. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Transhumanist politics. Legobot (talk) 00:01, 22 July 2015 (UTC) |
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (software). Legobot (talk) 00:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC) |
Please comment on Talk:Deluge (software)
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Deluge (software). Legobot (talk) 00:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wanderer of the Wasteland (1945 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Holt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 24 July 2015 (UTC)