Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GIGGAS2 (talk | contribs) at 03:05, 4 April 2007 (→‎Current requests for protection: requested semi-protection for WWE SDVR08). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    WWE SmackDown vs. Raw 2008 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. IP addresses are coming in and posted fraudalent roster data and location data. Thank you. ---- GIGGAS2 | Talk 03:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Armenia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect.. User:Ararat arev and his army of socks is wreaking havoc.. The page got fully protected, along with another article, four times in the last days for the same precise reason. Check user was done and apparently his proxies were blocked a couple of hours ago, but he seems to have found a way to sneak right back in.. Baristarim 02:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    2007 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy personnel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection - Being a current event and linked from the front page, this gets a lot of attention. One or two anons think that calling the sailors detainees is "Pro Iranian POV" and keep changing the wording to "hostages" (see talk page). There is also the problem of American anons "correcting" the Commonwealth English spelling. --Imroy 02:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Dora the Explorer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protection - Recent additions to this article have included the addition to Trivia that rumours exists (Dora the Explorer is an illegal immigrant), and the last edit by Princedebonair blanked the whole page and replaced it with a full statement that Droa was an illegal immigrant. There have been several reversions of this nature in last 72 hours, and request is now for this page to be semi protected. Thor Malmjursson 01:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC) (CVU)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - sorry (and I just reverted vandalism there myself) - Alison☺ 02:53, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Bud Abbott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection Full protection: Dispute, there seems to be an issue with the birth date of Bud Abbott. A new user continues to change Abbott's birth date to 1895, when all official sites and biographies contest that it is actually 1897. Unless the user can provide substantial proof, using the date referenced on a site run by Abbott's own children is more factual than the often cited (by no proof) date of 1985. I have reverted the change a few times, but I wanted to avoid an 'edit war' by requesting protection. I think I went over the "3 edit rule" by mistake and I will not make any more changes until a decision has been made. Thank you. Donaldd23 01:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    George's mom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    protection to prevent recreation - already recreated twice - we don't need this nonsense article around here. BlackBear 01:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected Húsönd 01:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Faggotry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full protection Full protection: Dispute, redirect page has been the recent subject of an edit war between anonymous IP editors who want it to redirect to various sites to disparage them, vs. editors who (properly) wish it to redirect to Homosexuality, since "faggotry" is an antiquated term for it. Yksin 00:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected Although this redirect is not under an intense attack at the moment, it is a fact that it is edited for vandalism purposes only. Anyway, full protection is not required.--Húsönd 01:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Rush Limbaugh‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi Protection - History of frequent IP vandalism, seems to have recently increased. --Dual Freq 23:50, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of five days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --Deskana (ya rly) 00:23, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Dana Altman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect - Coached bailed out on Arkansas fans at the last second and they're now attacking the page. Corpx 23:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined I see some vandalism but I also see some anons not only reverting the vandalism, but helping with improving the article. I'm not willing to sprotect it. --Deskana (ya rly) 00:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Sunshine Coast, Queensland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi Protection - recent attempts by IPs to spam their links onto a region article. A temporary semi-protection of a week or two may be needed. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 23:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. - blocked for spamming multiple articles past final warn - Alison☺ 23:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Turkey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism by banned user, Lakers 23:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected. semi-protected by Khoikhoi. -- zzuuzz(talk) 00:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Tottenham Hotspur F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism as soon as and ever since semi-protection was removed. Mattgibbins 22:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Alison☺ 22:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    This is following directly on from a previous protection. The protection was removed and it started again instantly. It's a continuation of what was happening before. Mattgibbins 23:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    I see three, maybe four IP editors over the last three days. That doesn't warrant semi-protection as this will block out genuine IP contributors. I note that at least two of the anons have not been contacted re. their edits - Alison☺ 23:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Death date and age (edit | [[Talk:Template:Death date and age|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    High risk template which should be protected (Gnevin 21:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

    Fully protected --Deskana (ya rly) 22:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    The template now needs fixing as a result.. Now fixed. - Dudesleeper · Talk 22:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Done Sorry about that. --Deskana (ya rly) 00:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Ryan Seacrest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    I would like to request semi-protection of this biography page because daily anonymous users add "is gay" somewhere in the page and it is annoying to have to go in to correct. Perhaps there could be a standard of having the page protected during American Idol season and unprotected the rest of the year? Thanks. Gillian416 19:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected - by User:Mike 7 - Alison☺ 19:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Rex Germanus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Maybe this is not the correct place for it, but where should I complain about the fact that user:Rex Germanus keeps removing items from his talk page?

    Govert Miereveld 19:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. This was not a request for page protection. In addition, removal of comments is not against any rules. --Deskana (ya rly) 19:22, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    300 (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism, either ideologically motivated or just plain stupid.--Javits2000 19:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - previously protected Alison☺ 19:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Roncalli High School (Indiana) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, persistent ip vandalism of the same user — zero » 18:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. - Alison☺ 18:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined - Alison☺ 18:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:UEFA5Star (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    Semi-protection, Recurrent, on-going vandalism by different IP accounts. --Mais oui! 18:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. --Deskana (ya rly) 19:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Dutch Declension System (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    This is not a POV. Several users are moving, reverting and vandalizing this page. If I revert it back to its original contents, saying this reflects the views and articles on the Dutch wikipedia, they even say I shouldn't cite the Dutch wikipedia! As if they could put rubbish onto the English wikipedia that does not support the views on the Dutch wikipedia at all. Furthermore it could be usefull to block some of these users.

    Ik weet niet waarom die zeveraars die pagina de hele tijd vandaliseren, maar ik ben Nederlandstalig en dat wil ik nu wel even duidelijk maken. Ge kunt misschien uiteindelijk toch uw zinneke op wikipedia doordrijven, maar daarmee zult ge de Nederlandse spraakkunst toch niet veranderen.

    If the page cannot be protected, I demand that this page and the page Dutch declension (created by user: Rex Germanus, Non erat pecunia quid olebat, sed erat Rex Germanus quis oluit, olet et semper olebit; after he removed the original contents, he kept uploading this garbage, so the I couldn't care less about the page ) be deleted, because they just contain a lot of bullshit.

    Govert Miereveld 18:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: - wasn't this requested yesterday? Leaving for another admin as I processed yesterday's request - Alison☺ 18:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    This was requested yesterday, but today it worsened. Furthermore user: Rex Germanus keeps removing comments and questions from his talk page.

    Govert Miereveld 18:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Repeatedly requesting it will get you nowhere. --Deskana (ya rly) 19:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Queen's College, Hong Kong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection, Recurrent, on-going vandalism by different accounts. - INTELer 18:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined only two other editors involved and most edits look reasonably constructive. Please discuss and warn/report for 3RR if revert-warring persists - Alison☺ 18:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Rosie O'Donnell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection Long term-- ongoing vandalism, BLP concerns in a major way over her fringe POV 9/11 statements that are gettings tons of media coverage and attention. - Denny 17:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of another week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - heavy and persistent anon vandalism. Just came off a protect from last week - Alison☺ 18:53, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Marc Garneau (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection +expiry 2 weeks, Semi-protection: Vandalism, constant vandalism Aiyda 17:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. - Alison☺ 18:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Alison☺ 18:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    England (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-Protect due to frequent vandalism. About three-quarters of edits in the last 50 are reversions or vandalism,

    — superbfc [ talk | cont ] — 16:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - previous prot ended and vandalism restarted - Alison☺ 17:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Ann Althouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. During the last week, following blogosphere controversy, this article has repeatedly been vandalized and/or dragged into NPOV by unregistered and new users, and would seem to sit squarely within the scope of a Semi-protection remedy (disabling editing from anonymous accounts and those accounts less than four days old). See history page. I fully support edits being made to this page, and thus request those edits be confined only to registered users in good standing, rather than anonymous users and socks. Simon Dodd 15:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Alison☺ 15:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, Alison - I've not used this process before (in two and a half years here, I have never seen behavior towards an article so meretricious as to demand such a remedy), so my follow-up question would be that if a pattern of abuse recurs after the protection lapses, is it appropriate to renominate the page afresh, or is there an alternative procedure that should be followed? Simon Dodd 16:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    No problem. And yes, if the vandalism takes off again, it's okay to re-request protection where it will probably be extended. Hopefully, they'll get bored, though :) - Alison☺ 16:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Basketball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection. This previously protected page could now stand some more protection, due to excessive vandalism and blanking by the minute over the last few days. Anthony Rupert 14:18, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected - by User:Michaelas10 - Alison☺ 15:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fleet captain (Star Trek) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    This page is in need of full protection due to an edit war turned nasty. Two users are going at eachother big time, one calling the other names, a liar, etc, and the other one placing in unsourced disputed material over and over again. -213.42.21.79 12:10, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined - not as bad as all that. Editors are at least in dialog. - Alison☺ 15:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Fully protected The decision to decline this request has been overturned at Alison's talk page. Michaelas10Respect my authoritah 16:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: agreed - Alison☺ 19:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Privacy (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Privacy|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Request full protection over a tag war. This is the exact same issue (forest fire) as at Protecing Children's Privacy and Youth Protection which were protected yesterday. >Radiant< 11:21, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined I see the historical tag being added on February 19, removed on March 8, added back on the same day, and removed on March 31. The merge tag was added on March 8 and removed on April 1, while the guideline one was removed on March 8. I don't see an edit war, at least for now. -- ReyBrujo 12:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:User wikipedia/RC Patrol (edit | [[Talk:Template:User wikipedia/RC Patrol|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Only semi-protection necessary, getting a lot of vandalism (ironically). Abeg92contribs 14:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. - Alison☺ 15:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Alison☺ 15:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Jamestown, Virginia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protected since December 2006. I'm not explicitly requesting unprotection but rather a review of whether the protection needs to continue. It was protected without any template, which probably explains why its status has lain dormant for so long. However looking at the history it appears to be a hot target for IP vandals for some reason. Any ideas? --84.68.162.114 23:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Heather Wilson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    This page has been protected since March 26. The name of the politician's husband's name needs to be removed from a controversial section heading.Therefore 20:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Mao: The Unknown Story (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    One of the participating editors have personally verified a source[1], and discussion seems to have died down. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 17:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected John Reaves (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia:Notability (films) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    There is no longer any reason for protection. Tom Harrison Talk 12:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected - seems to be reasonably okay now - Alison☺ 15:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Avril Lavigne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Why is her article protected and is whatever the reason still valid? Could it be unprotected? I haven't seen it suggested that it was due to vandalism... Mpassman 11:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined The protection will expire in a few hours anyway[2]. -- zzuuzz(talk) 12:29, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Devaneya Pavanar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    The intial article had strong evidences to prove that, but this article has been edited towards favour óf Anti-Tamils. This needs to be corrected according to the facts. I have given all references/proof/evidences from the Government Virtual Library(www.tamilvu.org). To remove the baised edtion, please unprotect this article.Rajan 09:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    it is semiprotected because Acrajan (talk · contribs) used a blatant sock to restore his copyvio version. He can edit it under his established account. dab (𒁳) 09:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Discordian Works (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Edit warring has died down, needs to be subject to the editing process again. People need to be able to provide sources. Moreschi Request a recording? 08:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    The_Indian_Institute_of_Planning_and_Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    User:Ponytailsnipper has broken the 3RR repeatedly, and now the page has been protected with his attack-page version. He has been repeatedly going against consensus, and unilaterally reverting. Sunilalagh 04:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected by User:Rama's Arrow - just yesterday - Alison☺ 15:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: - the edit war is far from over. Please reach consensus on the talk page - Alison☺ 15:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Claudette Colbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    I want to change the image size to 240px. 219.104.30.92 09:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Anchor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    This article recently fully protected following edit war and vandalism (content deletion under pretense of spam) from Russeasby (now 24-hr blocked for 3RR violation). The deleted content in question is sourced and perfectly NPOV. Third party opinions in Talk:Anchor are against this deletion, e.g. that from Hoof Hearted, and advice from one other solicited third party (Shell Kinney) warned cessation of these edits. Protection fell upon final revert by Russeasby before revision could take place. Suggest this be rolled back. Badmonkey 15:31, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    July 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Lots of anon user vandalism. Mostly people adding silly birthdays and stuff. --Julian (http://beautifulrecords.org/) 06:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    This type of vandalism is fairly common for dates of the year. I'm not suggesting that it's ok, but I think that if we protected this, we'd have to go through an protect the other 364. That's not really a feasible option. Regards, alphachimp 06:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Tiffany Pollard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Large amount of anon / new user vandalism on this page. -- Semper discipulus 06:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected due to heavy vandalism. alphachimp 06:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    University of Florida (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Requesting a semi protect until March madness is over. Many vandalism attempts from various random ipsShindo9Hikaru 02:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Alison☺ 06:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Ziaur Rahman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Today's featured article is under a 20-hour semi-protection. I realizes there is anon-vandalism but for today's featured article it it not particularly extreme. Doesn't WP:PROT say to avoid protecting TFA if at all possible? The subject is deceased anyway so there's no BLP issue. —dgiestc 06:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected - per WP:NOPRO, article is on the main page - Alison☺ 06:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Spite & Malice (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    I would like to request unprotection and unblocking for this account (both user and talk pages)so that the User can apologise to those offended, as well as to attempt redemption through exemplary conduct. Ta. 87.65.39.240 11:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Who are you, exactly? Your contributions say nothing about you. It's not possible to rule out that you're a sockpuppet or meatpuppet acting on behalf of the user in question, trying to get them unblocked. If you truly do have concerns, contact the administrator responsible for protection/blocking the user. Anonymous users are, of course, welcome to post here, but they must be willing to accept a certain amount of suspicion from administrators regarding certain cases. --Deskana (ya rly) 16:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry, I should have explained better, I am actually the former user:spite & malice. I would like to apologise to those I offended at least, as well as trying to make amends if allowed. I would basically like either 24 hours to apologise or permanent unblocking to allow me to make up for my stupid behaviour. I have contacted the admin but she has not replied. Thanks. 87.65.39.240 07:13, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Jennifer Aniston‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Persistant anon or new user vandalism usually with offensive comments about Aniston‎ herself. This occurs at least once a day or sometimes more. ~~ Peteb16 06:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Alison☺ 06:11, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Vince McMahon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Persistent heavy anon vandalism. I have been watching this page for a month or so, last temporary semi-protection for a week expired 31 March 2007, but vandalism revives after this. See its history page for details. I think it needs permanent semi-protection, or vandalism would just continue. --Raphaelmak 04:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected - by User:Can't sleep, clown will eat me - Alison☺ 06:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Bigfoot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protection +expiry 5 days, Semi-protection: Vandalism, Numerous contribs from IPs. Many are unconstructive and not helpful. -- Hdt83 Chat 03:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - heavy and persistent anon vandalism - Alison☺ 06:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Association of Members' Advocates|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Full protection a discussion that is already over and closed, still edit warring going on. Wooyi 03:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined Appears to be an accidental edit war, and resolved at that. John Reaves (talk) 05:02, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Greg Oden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    requesting semi-protect, random IP nonsense vandalism. until tomorrow or so after the Final Four. thanks. --Rajah 03:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Alison☺ 03:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Wal-Mart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Sr13 (T|C) 02:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Alison☺ 03:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Renaissance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Sr13 (T|C) 02:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 7 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- ReyBrujo 02:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


    Big Fat Awesome House Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protect. Continuing addition of a code-list, something I've removed more times than can count. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 01:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined User(s) blocked. --Deskana (ya rly) 01:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Chi-Chi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    semi-protect. Frequently vandalized by mostly IP's with some "new users" thrown in. In most cases, I've been the one catching and reverting the vandalism. Ranma9617 01:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. WinHunter (talk) 01:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection - One of those articles that should never be without semi-protect: Incessant random vandalism, blankings etc from multiple sources, the whole page history is basically vandalism and "rvv's".. Baristarim 00:56, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for 3 weeks due to heavy vandalism. WinHunter (talk) 01:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

    Lloyd Banks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    can you make the lloyd banks page protected

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - Alison☺ 19:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=120140502"