Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Machel Waikenda: new section
Line 587: Line 587:
*{{revisions|The_Crown_Inn_Coalway‎}}
*{{revisions|The_Crown_Inn_Coalway‎}}
It was not made clear why the page was deleted. It was a factual page regarding the last of its kind in a village. -[[User:Wassj93|Wassj93]] ([[User talk:Wassj93|talk]]) 16:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
It was not made clear why the page was deleted. It was a factual page regarding the last of its kind in a village. -[[User:Wassj93|Wassj93]] ([[User talk:Wassj93|talk]]) 16:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

== Machel Waikenda ==

*{{revisions|Machel Waikenda}}
Hello everyone. The article was deleted under [[WP:G5|G5]] because the article was created by an user who's account got blocked later because of Sock Puppetry. But I think the article had the notability to be enlisted on Wikipedia. So, is there any way to restore this article? I can fix it if it has some neutrality issues. -[[User:Sourov0000|Sourov0000]] ([[User talk:Sourov0000|talk]]) 20:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:20, 12 January 2014


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Coyoteism

This page shouldn't be deleted because we are writing about a real religion and I'm feeling offended when you delete it like our religion is fake! i wasn't done with the page when you deleted it i just saved it because i wanted to see how it looked for other people, I'm going to add that it is a religion and more, when I'm done with the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coyoteism (talk • contribs)

  • Not done - Wikipedia isn't for things you've made up. Acroterion (talk) 04:46, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Since the article creator asserts this is a real religion it may or may not fall under WP:NOTMADEUP -- unable to see the article I have no way of knowing. However, in the spirit of WP:DONTBITE I will offer to the user that his/her personal involvement in the religion ("...our religion...") makes his/her creation of this article problematic due to a personal conflict of interest (see WP:COI). I strongly suggest the user request assistance for creating this article from the Article for Creation team, BUT ONLY AFTER CAREFULLY STUDYING the fundamentals of article creation (see WP:Simpleintro and WP:YFA). There is no guarantee that the article can be created, especially if reliable sources cannot be provided, but if the user fails to study and understand "the basics" then his/her article will definitely not get created at all. F6697 FORMERLY 66.97.209.215 TALK 19:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Shields

The initial article was deleted because the subject of the article did not appear to have sufficient notoriety due to an incomplete article. The notoriety of the article's subject has increased dramatically since the article's initial submission. Also, additional enhancements to the original article will be submitted that will be compliant with Wikipedia's policies. -Babelfisher (talk) 20:22, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Nothing to undelete. That article has never existed in main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
However, you are welcome to continue improving the version sitting as a rejected AfC submission found here: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tim Shields. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 03:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Phantasy Star images

Phantasy Star Gaiden - Cover.jpg

Deleted following undiscussed redirect of the article, article needed cleaning up. Not redirecting. -ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phantasy Star Gaiden-sshot1.png

Fair use image deleted after discussion-less redirecting of the article. Article does need clean up, but not deletion. -ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phantasy_Star_Adventure_-_Cover.jpg

Fair use image deleted following redirect of article. The article was not discussed prior to redirecting. -ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Phantasy Star Adventure-sshot1.png

Fair use image deleted following redirect of article. The article was not discussed prior to redirecting. -ChrisGualtieri (talk) 16:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The relevant articles were deleted after AfD (and recreated as redirects). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 04:52, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steel Core

Page was deleted with the nominator and ONE PERSON voting. The one person voting suggested that the page be moved to the Transformers wiki, but the article is not about a Transformers character, so I doubt he read or understood the article. The creator of the page was not notified of the proposed deletion, which is usually standard procedure. -Mathewignash (talk) 20:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This article was deleted at AfD, and as such, may not be restored here. Consider taking the article to deletion review, but please consult with the deleting administrator first before doing so. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 02:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The opening sentence of this page read: "Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages... in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator." - As stated the nominator and one person (who didn't even know what the article was about!) were the only people in the AFD, and the nominator didn't follow proper procedure in notifying the article creator that the article was up for deletion. The nominator has even been warned to notify the creator of articles when he AFDs them, it's on his talk page. The failure to follow proper procedure, and lack of any real feedback on the AFD clearly negates the AFDs validity. I believe it can be undeleted here for these reasons. Mathewignash (talk) 03:15, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Good point - truly forgot 'bout that, sorry (I've been accustomed to seeing AFD'ed articles getting thrown about to DRV that I didn't realise REFUND applied to discussions with participations that only derived from one other participant). Still, having looked at the subject on a G-search, there are relatively few hits regarding the subject. If you can point to a number of reliable sources containing significant coverage of the subject, this may give cause for undeletion. hmssolent\You rang? ship's log 10:13, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That can be easily overlooked, and can also be easily discarded when one reviews the "caliber" of those involved in the discussion. I can understand userfication here, but not undeletion into articlespace ES&L 12:23, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The circumstances of this AFD CLEARLY put it within the range of an undeletion request. I'd prefer the article get undeleted, and if the nominator wishes to have a PROPER deletion nomination, let it be his burden to prove it's not a worthy article. The article itself has sources from a half dozen toy news podcasts, and several stories cited from toy new web sites which have been deemed as reliable in other AFDs, like Entertainment News International. Mathewignash (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, in your opinion. Now, with the arguments you're placing, you've just pushed yourself into DRV mode. Good luck there. Cheers ES&L 16:29, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
If you doubt notability by reliable third party sources, perhaps you should read Transforming Collections by Philip Reed, who is the editor for Steve Jackson Games, who devoted two pages of his book to Steel Core.Mathewignash (talk) 16:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Two points:
  • Matthew, you wrote above "the article is not about a Transformers character, so I doubt he read or understood the article", but the article itself said "Steel Core is an original third party Transformer character"
  • The first port of call if you disagree with the outcome of an AfD should always be the closing admin, in this case Mark Arsten (talk). Have you consulted him? I suggest you ask him if he is willing to userfy the article for you to work on.
JohnCD (talk) 17:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I came here because the circumstance followed exactly what was stated in the opening sentence of this page. I will edit the page to be more accurate than calling it a "third part Transformer" once it's restored. Mathewignash (talk) 17:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just a word, if this comes to DRV you will get nowhere by attacking other users as it will get summarily closed. If you make a nomination stick to sources and policy. Thanks. Spartaz Humbug! 20:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/SUPERIOR Magazine

I, Artofstyle, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Artofstyle (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - there is no point undeleting this AfC submission, because the actual article exists at SUPERIOR Magazine. JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jim Dow

I, Saucemon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate.

Please undelete the page so I can revisit my research and solve the issues related to citing the material. However, I believe you need to reconsider allowing me to use the Guggenheim as a source for it's fellowship recipients. It is a world renown institution that houses fine art and awards fellowships every year in multiple categories. I would have used the already existing Wikipedia page, "List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1974" for an already published source, but when you click the hyperlink to Jim Dow, it brings you to another Jim Dow, who was not a photographer, and died two years before the award was given. Please understand, I am trying to be completely accurate. This man deserves a complete page, for he is an incredibly inspirational exhibiting artist who is the forefront of hybrid photographic methods. Please help me with this. Please undelete my work thus far. -Saucemon (talk) 19:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - there is no point undeleting this AfC submission, because there is already an article about him at Jim Dow. You are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Afterthought - if you would like access to your material, I can email you a copy. JohnCD (talk) 20:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nair & Co.

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I was editing this to remove promotional content when it was deleted. —Anne Delong (talk) 20:11, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Raymond Suchy

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Arpistria (talk • contribs) 20:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Egon Ranshofen-Wertheimer Award

reasoning -Nwoak (talk) 21:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC) I would like to rewrite this article but can't create it, as it has been deleted in 2008.[reply]

Userfied. The title was salted - protected against creation - because in 2007/8 it was repeatedly created without any evidence of notability. I have restored it to User:Nwoak/Egon Ranshofen-Wertheimer Award where you can work on it. I will re-protect the title, so you should submit it via Articles for Creation, by clicking the "Submit the page" link in the box at the top when it is ready. What you have to show is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Randy Rolfe

I, Rayevsky, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Rayevsky (talk) 23:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ewa Domzala (Ewa Lilla Domżała)

This was requested by 95.49.9.93 (talk · contribs), but the request was malformed. I am merely restoring it on their behalf and have no opinion one way or another on the merits of the request. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:51, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1965 – Through the Looking Glass

Notability. I don't know what userfy is but you may need to attach me as the author - I certainly authored the original article, but may not have been logged in when I did that. -Sa cooke (talk) 02:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! After 6 years away a lot of my articles have been deleted, so I'll be back asking for more undeletions in due course. Sa cooke (talk) 03:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Planixs

I, 92.25.180.205, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 92.25.180.205 (talk) 03:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The submission is written like an advertisement and meets speedy deletion criteria G11. I suggest you start from scratch if you wish to write an article on this topic. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Album_Network_Expando_Tuneup_24

Notability - This is one of a number of compilation albums The Stairs contributed songs to. During my 6 year absence from Wikipedia it was deleted. I contest the justification. -Sa cooke (talk) 04:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Album Network Expando Tuneup 24, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 04:56, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Salvidrim!: If you had read the discussion you will have seen I was not part of that. You might call tht a discussion, but to discuss without any input from the original author seems not to be a discussion at all. I want to take part in it now as I was not informed at the time either of the discussion nor of the impending deletion. I have not logged in to Wikipedia in over six years. Sa cooke (talk) 05:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I understand, however, Wikipedia articles don't have authors. You may have initially created the page but it was available to be worked on by everyone, and other users contributed to the article prior to its deletion; for this reason, there is no requirement for an AfD discussion to involve any of the contributors to the article being discussed, and the page creator is as often involved in the discussion as he is not. At the present time, the community's consensus (as it emerged from the discussion linked above) is that there should not be an article on this topic, and this Requests for undeletion page specifically cannot go against the community's consensus and restore pages deleted following a discussion. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 05:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, it consisted entirely of an infobox and a track listing, without a single reference, so there is really no significant content to be restored. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 05:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Salvidrim!: Understood; however, how can I tell who deleted the article? it's deleted, along with the talk page. And don't tell me it's Cirt, as he is no longer an admin. And why is that not significant content? I don't want to waste my time typing content again when it's within your (or another admin's) power to restore. Sa cooke (talk) 05:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Cirt was indeed the one who closed the AfD and deleted the article, and he indeed isn't an administrator anymore. I agree that you should not waste your time typing the same content again, because your recreation of the article would make it elegible for speedy deletion under criterion G4, which covers the recreation of material against the previously established community's consensus. If you disagree with the consensus that emerged from the discussion linked above, which demonstrates the community's belief that the subject of the article is not notable, then you need to submit it for deletion review, saying why you believe the consensus is incorrect. The only other option for you is to create a new article, supported by significant coverage in reliable, independent sources in order to demonstrate its notability. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 05:21, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Belligerence, sarcasm, and rudeness is not needed thank you very much. You need to consider what you say to people buddy. And how that might be interpreted. Ok, I'll take the issue up elsewhere as you suggest. The article will be restored, and I will then have the opportunity to expand it. Sa cooke (talk) 05:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I... I frankly have no idea what to reply. I've started to type 3 replies and deleted them while blankly gaping at my monitor. If you genuinely think my above reply was belligerent, sarcastic and rude, you're in for quite a surprise in your future Wikipedia communications. Good luck! ;) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 05:30, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sa cooke, I don't think Salvidrim!'s reply was rude. He/she clearly pointed out the two possible paths: (1) write a new, differently worded article, and (2) ask for a review of the deletion, pointing out new sources of information that may change the consensus. This reply may have saved you from wasting your time with another approach, so it was actually helpful, and I hope that you will reinterpret. —Anne Delong (talk) 16:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just want to note for the sake of archival that this has now been opened at DRV. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 17:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit DSP

The article was deleted due to "lack of notability". We spotted that it was proposed for deletion too late, and didn't have a chance to improve it. Please get it back and we will have it editted properly within a week. Thanks in advance! -91.226.161.173 (talk) 10:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:33, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mobile Monitoring

I, Jschweizer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jschweizer (talk) 11:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Table Of The Sun

I, 71.21.155.91, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Still researching this subject for additional citations and references 71.21.155.91 (talk) 14:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Escargot Brothers

I, GeeBeeY, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. GeeBeeY (talk) 14:53, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 15:29, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dawna Lee Heising

I, 98.191.205.186, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 98.191.205.186 (talk) 16:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done this was too promotional. It can however be recreated using less promotional language. If your are the subject I would suggest that you do not write about yourself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:33, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Foley Belsaw

I, Wvamark, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Wvamark (talk) 17:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Foley Belsaw

I am continuing to research -Wvamark (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GamedayHousing.com

2602:306:BC52:DF20:CA2A:14FF:FE31:25AF (talk) 18:32, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Theodoros Moschonas

reasoning -Manos H. Scorer (talk) 20:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC) The player made professional debut with his new team. I have accurate links for that.[reply]

 Done. Please update it quickly with links to show how he now meets WP:NFOOTY, or it is likely to be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 22:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sixtiers

I, Etolpygo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Etolpygo (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. There is no point undeleting this AfC draft, because an article exists in the main encyclopedia at Sixtiers. You are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Han Bangqing

I, 69.203.71.100, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 69.203.71.100 (talk) 20:46, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tin Lizzy's Cantina

reasoning -Msbmla (talk) 21:07, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SMS_gateways

reasoning -108.33.151.18 (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC) The list of all US and Canada SMS gateways was removed please find and replace. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_SMS_gateways[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of SMS gateways, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Coffee (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tnaturningpoint2005.jpg

It was removed from TNA Turning Point and deleted as maintenance. I have expanded the article it belongs in at User:Wrestlinglover/Turning Point (2005) and with lucky I will be finished today. I previously had a filed reinstated for the same reasons with Genesis (2005). -WillC 22:32, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Wrestlinglover: Fair use images cannot be used outside the mainspace and you have the image markup in the draft. Once in the mainspace there should be no problem with undeletion of the file, but do that first please. Just drop a note here that you've done it and I or anyone else can take care of it then (you can prefix your post with a ping template to draw my attention here more quickly, just as I did for you in this response). Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna place it in Turning Point (2005 wrestling) when I have expanded. It is just gonna sit outside of any article until I'm finished. I'll have a week before it is deleted again. I understand the rules. I just wanted to get ahead of it and not have to wait. Last time I asked for an undeletion it took a day or so.--WillC 23:15, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As a fair use image it really shouldn't sit orphaned either. We treat that as a necessary evil and wait when it was in use to see whether it will become un-orphaned but with a deleted file, it really should be ready to go when undeleted. It's not likely to take a day and even if it does, that won't hurt the article.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:44, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Fuhghettaboutit: Alright, I have created the article and nominated it for GA. Now the image can be undeleted and I'll place it in the article.--WillC 16:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Wrestlinglover: Undeleted! Cheers.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done For the bot —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Walter Orr

I, 172.12.173.119, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 172.12.173.119 (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anchor Managed Hosting

Admin executing the CSD cites unambigous advertising or promotion as their reasion for deletion. It has been the custom to give more leeway in the Articles for creation space with respect to G11 and to only use that method when the submission is hopelessly advertising and to a much higher standard than the main article namespace. Admin who deleted the page is retired and is in a potential catch-22 situation currently. They can't use their admin privileges because they were accused of misusing them, but to not use them denies a anonymous editor the privilege of an appeal and time to improve the submission (User_talk:Kafziel#Information_regarding_deleted_page_-_Anchor_Managed_Hosting). I request that either the page be restored to it's original location so that the anonymous editor can work on improving the article or a explanation of how bad the advertising/spam is on the draft. -Hasteur (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request.
I agree that this is not bad enough to qualify for speedy deletion from AfC space, but it is not an acceptable article: is very clearly the company using Wikipedia to "tell the world" about itself and its services: "their US support team allow them to provide 24x7 support... provides a range of services including... Anchor's infrastructure is highly scalable... a complete hands off solution... " etc.
I have advised the author, user Anchorsystems (talk), to change username (not that an individual username will remove the clear conflict of interest here), and suggest following the excellent advice of a very experienced Wikipedian at User:Uncle G/On notability#Writing about subjects close to you:

"When writing about subjects that are close to you, don't use your own personal knowledge of the subject, and don't cite yourself, your web site, or the subject's web site. Instead, use what is written about the subject by other people, independently, as your sources. Cite those sources in your very first edit. If you don't have such sources, don't write."

JohnCD (talk) 12:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

QSI_International_School_of_Phuket

I, 180.180.124.181, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 180.180.124.181 (talk) 03:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The AfC submission Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/QSI International School of Phuket has not been deleted, though as it has not been touched since May 2013 it may be deleted soon. If you make any edit to it, that will prevent immediate deletion.
However an actual article has today been posted at QSI International School of Phuket and you may like to improve that, otherwise it may well be nominated for deletion. It needs references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 13:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Jersey Syndicate (2)

Kaylanicole (talk) 04:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:30, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dolma Lhakang

Hi! I note that the article I was watching, 'Dolma Lhakang' () was speedily deleted. I believe that it shouldn't have been, but that is just my personal opinion. Since the deletion, further references have come up. I would be grateful if there was some way of 'restoring' this article to my own namespace (so it doesn't appear in Wikipedia), so that I can update the content and make it worth of Wikipedia inclusion. Please let me know how I should go about this, and if there is any more information I should give. Thank you (and Happy New Year!) :) ). Buckethed (talk) 06:26, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Please repair your request - we cannot process malformed requests. Please use the code {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request). ES&L 10:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CART-WHEEL.org

I, CARTWHEEL1000, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. staff member managing the request left organisation and was not replaced for 11 months. Now have staff to manage this process. CARTWHEEL1000 (talk) 07:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Allegaeon

I, Heath24green, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Heath24green (talk) 09:49, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:13, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rousseau Metal

NB: The user making the request below reverted the page to a version from November, when she had asked the first time, and I reverted that change - I am now reinstating her two requests on her behalf. --bonadea contributions talk 16:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Rousseau Metal · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions] As discussed with Mark Arsten I updated the page with new links and references. Thank you. -Isabellelf (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's been over a month, I see that other people received some kind of answer, I didn't. Can you please let me know the status of this request? Thank you Isabellelf (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that you have got rather lost in our complicated system, and I do not know why your first request here was overlooked. This is in fact not the right place to ask for the result of an AfD discussion to be reversed: Mark Arsten actually said: "Ok, now you can apply for undeletion at WP:DRV" - Deletion review, a different forum. By way of amends, I have now made the necessary entry there for you - see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 January 7. You are welcome to make any additional comment there. JohnCD (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your help is very much appreciated. 206.162.159.82 Isabellelf (talk) 19:43, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 19:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

King of Europe Series

reasoning -Mprocureur (talk) 16:07, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reekrit Serai

Based on available sources of third-party reliable sources, all information in the article is not unsourced. I request a clean-up of the article, with only sourced information being presented. We should not discourage young people. I will be created more pages on young artists within the following few weeks. -Radzee (talk) 17:28, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reekrit Serai, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ymblanter (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.
One comment in reply to yours: Wikipedia is not here to encourage the "up and coming". As an encyclopedia, it covers only those who have already arrived, and whomeet the notability standard of WP:ARTIST. JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Quilla

Michi44 (talk) 19:17, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/John_Albert_Matthes

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 76.77.121.224 (talk) 01:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Unauthorized Autobiography of Samantha Brown

I am interested in this musical and want to learn about it, but there are no sites to find it on. Originally deleted through PROD. -66.30.84.204 (talk) 04:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. This may well be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion unless more references can be added showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. The only references are from the authors and the venue where the musical was performed. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steve Phillips

I, 99.65.240.112, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 99.65.240.112 (talk) 05:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please edit it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. "I know Steve Phillips" is not enough as a reference - if the article is to be accepted, you will need to add at least one reference to a reliable, published source to verify what the article says and confirm that he meets the notability standard of WP:NHOCKEY. JohnCD (talk) 10:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

H. V. Kumar

Please undelete this article, I've some updates from credit worthy articles. Thanks -Aarganesh (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/H. V. Kumar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ES&L 10:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Telekomunikasi_Indonesia_International_(TL)_S.A.

I already edited the article follow the guidance but still deleted? what is the problem. Please consider again. Thanks -Wharyadi (talk) 08:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...and I already see that you have recreated it, which means it will soon be deleted again. Wikipedia is not a business directory, it is an encyclopedia of notable topics, see especially the notability guidelines for businesses. Wikipedia will at no time accept anything that looks like promotion ES&L 10:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How to delete an Article manually?

StaxRip

This is not spamming. First I created the article Staxrip, then I realised that the R should be capital and created this one. Admins may have thot that it is spamming. Delete the Staxrip, but not StaxRip. -AkilaDJ (talk) 18:05, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the speedy delete, but I will not restore the copyright violation deleted before.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:57, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of corporations with a major presence in Birmingham, Alabama

Although somewhat outdated, this list is quite useful. -160.109.27.16 (talk) 18:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Emeraldcities (talk) 20:35, 8 January 2014

I have have restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emerald Cities Collaborative. I suggest you change you username as it looks as if you are not an individual. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RJ Parker

I, Author RJ Parker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Author RJ Parker (talk) 22:09, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Lemay

This article was deleted through AfD in 2011. I'd like to have the content restored to my user space to see if I can improve upon it. -Gobōnobō + c 02:35, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Isuru Prabath

This page is about a real person living in Sri Lanka -Slispra (talk) 03:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spring of life ministries thane

Samsonharrison (talk) 05:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - This has not been deleted and you are welcome to continue working on it. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 05:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Playdale Playgrounds Ltd.

I, Rbeachplaydale, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Rbeachplaydale (talk) 10:22, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:14, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And now Not done. I was on the fence over whether to permit this or not due to its content - since another admin has since deleted it under G11 (and then restored it after noticing this thread) I have come to the conclusion that I should have come down on the other side of that fence. I've therefore deleted the page again, as overly promotional. Note that the user is now also blocked for promotional editing. Yunshui 雲‍水 14:45, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Playdale Playgrounds Ltd

because we have recently expanded our business and have received national coverage that we can include in our entry. This was the reason why we were refused last time. -Rbeachplaydale (talk) 10:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, this article has never existed in mainspace. Please use the AFC draft, above, to make your

Articles for creation/Bottle of Smoke Press

Nanla Turner (talk) 13:36, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done The page was entirely promotional, and would qualify for speedy deletion for that reason. While we do generally allow more leeway in Articles for creation than actual articles, Articles for creation is not a place to indefinitely store pages that would be unsuitable as articles. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sligo Live Music Festival

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I found some news reports, but while I was looking the page was deleted. —Anne Delong (talk) 18:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done Thanks again for your good work, Anne! ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:32, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Andrej Prskalo

The player was played in full-pro league. -Jolicnikola (talk) 01:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Please update the article and add a reliable source to show that he meets WP:NFOOTY, or it may be deleted again. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Carabello

reasoning -Mkwhi2 (talk) 01:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added a sentence or two to this article and found it to be accurate. I do think that the name should be Michael Carabello, however, not Mike. He goes by Mike to friends, but his stage name is Michael.

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. I have moved it to Michael Carabello and also reverted to the last good version before it was re-written as a PR puff piece which, as the PROD nomination said, "reads like a summary page from a press kit used to promote artists/musicians". Even then, part of it was unsourced gossip, which I have removed. I have added refs, but it could do with expansion. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

scientific analysis instruments

I wish to have this article undeleted for either one of two reasons. Firstly, I do not believe it qualifies for deletion under "A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". I feel that the presence of the article on the company its self adds to the completeness of Wikipedia as it contains articles detailing other companies that manufacture mass spectrometers and that when looking into mass spectrometry, it is helpful to link to pages about companies activly involved in the research and development of mass spectrometry. The fact that the company in question manufactures and develops mass spectrometers is justification enough to the scientific community to warrent its inclusion. Secondly, if the article still warrents deletion as it is not properly referenced or still does not indicate its relevence, I would request that the script is sent to me by email or sent to my sandbox so I can improve the quality of the content -DrMNairn (talk) 09:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:DrMNairn/Scientific Analysis Instruments. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact RHaworth (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. Notability in Wikipedia's sense is not a matter of saying so, but has tom be demonstrated by references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 11:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Udita Tyagi

to get the backup -Munishwar Gulati 09:53, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Not done too promotional. But you can rewrite in a neutral tone using reliable sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quillan Roberts

Quillan Roberts has been backup keeper for Toronto FC for 2 years, and although hasn't played a regular season match, has been on the bench for many, has received media coverage, and even played in the 2012 match against Liverpool. There's no way that this long-standing article should have been prodded - should at least have gone to AFD for discussion Nfitz (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC) -Nfitz (talk) 13:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:19, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manjunath Aradhya

There is a need for that person to be known to many people in this world.Many of his students search about him to know what he is doing right now. SO i think it is important that the page is undeleted -PoorneshYalamuri (talk) 14:05, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Ohnoitsjamie (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Amatulić (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sean Burch

I, 70.208.165.109, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 70.208.165.109 (talk) 14:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Data as code

The related concept code as data is sound and refers to several techniques found in computing. I want to review the text to see if a broad concept article can be created covering both terms, please userfy or move to Draft. -Diego (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. This was a PROD deletion so could have been restored directly, but it is so extremely thin that I have put it in Draft:Data as code as you suggested. If you decide not to use it, let me know and I will re-inter it. JohnCD (talk) 16:12, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:MD Sonic the Hedgehog.png

While this may seem paradoxical, I am requesting undeletion for a previous version of this picture because the new version is higher quality. The picture was originally kept at a lower resolution on purpose in order to properly represent the fact that this is a Sega Genesis game, where visible pixels would be a given. However, User:HappyLogolover2011 appears to have used an emulator and/or a photo editor to provide a picture that smooths out the graphics which, while it does techincally make a "better quality" picture, misrepresents the game. It was originally deleted after HappyLogo put up a "Orphaned non-free revision" tag after uploading his new version, resulting in an admin promptly deleting it. -TheStickMan[✆Talk] 17:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was meant to smooth out because we need better results. Also, it was upscaled using the xBRz alithogram to present a smooth picture used from an emulator with their graphic settings.--HappyLogolover2011 (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As I (and others) have already said, the point of these pictures is to accurately represent the game. The attempts to improve their quality are appreciated but not needed at all. TheStickMan[✆Talk] 19:02, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Surrender The Fall

I, Anne Delong, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. I found quite a few 2013 reviews for this band, but while I was looking the submission was deleted. —Anne Delong (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 22:50, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mahmoud Elshal

I, Tahroy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Tahroy (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Boxing Hall of Fame Las Vegas

I, Boxinghalloffame, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Boxinghalloffame (talk) 22:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The article needs references that show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ruturaj Prajapati (Member)

reasoning -Ruturaj Prajapati (Member) (talk) 10:23, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - user blocked as block-evading sock, here only for self-promotion. JohnCD (talk) 10:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Child Rights Information Network

is a well-known and notable organisation in children's rights, cited by the UN and others. I looked for Google Books citations, and stopped at 20. -Rbreen (talk) 11:48, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Boleyn (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 21:33, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Okada

Marie Megumi Okada is a television announcer from Wakayama,Japan.She is represented by the Okayama Broadcasting/OHK. She Started her career after she earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Tourism at Wakayama University.Aside from being an anoouncer,She is also a MC and a broadcaster.Okada is a half-Japanese and half-Filipino. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chantaru (talk • contribs) 12:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:12, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slimeballs1.jpg

Deleting admin now inactive. Want to add image to Slimeballs ---evrik (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dorce Sardoc

I, Cimok78, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. FlavioB 13:58, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/C.L.G. An Tearmainn

I, CLGAnTearmainn, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. CLGAnTearmainn (talk) 20:11, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I would like to add this page to Wikipedia. I'm not sure how to link to other pages but there are pages about other Donegal GAA teams so I would like to add Termon to this list. Serches for "Ardara GAA", "Glenswilly GAA" and Donegal GAA in general will show this.

Thanking you in advance for your help, Connell McGrenra CLG An Tearmainn

The_Rapsody_Overture

article was relevant and referenced by several other pages -Tdejong67 (talk) 00:45, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Boleyn (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please add references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 12:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Erick Kaffka

Administrator failed to research credits given through SAG-AFTRA, Erick Kaffka has 6 acting credits given by the productions in addition to a starring role on an entire season of Welcome to Paradox, and starring roles on 2 episodes of Untold Stories of the ER. His charity work and advocacy with the disabled through show business is highly notable. He is also the only double AK amputee actor in North America. The administrator stated in his reasons for deletion that the "actor known to date exclusively for extra or stunt double roles" is potentially damaging to this person's career as this is not a researched fact. See IMDB and notice the CREDITED roles. Erick Kaffka has not done background work since 1999. For future reference, a Stunt Double is a recognized credit by the The Academy of Motion Pictures & Sciences, and The Academy of Television Arts & Sciences and is not an unimportant job. Also I am not his agent, his original bio was taken from my fundraiser website that he was the keynote speaker for by someone unknown to me and placed on IMDB. Your administrators need to do more research on subjects (especially pertaining to people). All you have to do is google this person to see all of the articles written about him across the globe. Perhaps you should allow more time for other contributors to add. If you are going to leave it deleted, then please remove the part about him not only doing "extra or stunt double roles" This is clearly not the case.-Paraisoevents (talk) 04:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Please note that Wikipedia has a very specific definition of notability - only subjects that multiple third-party reliable sources with no connection to the subject have written about are notable by Wikipedia's standards. See also our username policy, because irrespective of whether or not you are his agent, your username gives the impression that you are editing on behalf of a company. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 09:10, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PASACAT

I, Datamonger, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Datamonger (talk) 05:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ZenDay

I was not familiar with the PROD process and did not remove the PROD notice to avoid deletion. However we did add missing information, including external links to third-party discussions that prove notability. Thanks! -Richardfr74 (talk) 09:15, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user NatGertler (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. JohnCD (talk) 11:53, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sara Eisen

I, Marki10024, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Marki10024 (talk) 15:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Crown Inn Coalway

It was not made clear why the page was deleted. It was a factual page regarding the last of its kind in a village. -Wassj93 (talk) 16:07, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Machel Waikenda

Hello everyone. The article was deleted under G5 because the article was created by an user who's account got blocked later because of Sock Puppetry. But I think the article had the notability to be enlisted on Wikipedia. So, is there any way to restore this article? I can fix it if it has some neutrality issues. -Sourov0000 (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=590406438"