Tesla Autopilot is a suite of advanced driver-assistance system features offered by Tesla that has lane centering, traffic-aware cruise control, self-parking, automatic lane changes, semi-autonomous navigation on limited access freeways, and the ability to summon the car from a garage or parking spot. In all of these features, the driver is responsible and the car requires constant supervision. The company claims the features reduce accidents caused by driver negligence and fatigue from long-term driving. In October 2020, Consumer Reports called Tesla Autopilot "a distant second" (behind Cadillac's Super Cruise), although it was ranked first in the "Capabilities and Performance" and "Ease of Use" category.
As an upgrade to the base Autopilot capabilities, the company's stated intent is to offer full self-driving (FSD) at a future time, acknowledging that legal, regulatory, and technical hurdles must be overcome to achieve this goal. As of April 2020, most experts believe that Tesla vehicles lack the necessary hardware for full self-driving. Tesla was ranked last by Navigant Research in March 2020 for both strategy and execution in the autonomous driving sector.
Tesla's Autopilot can be classified as level 2 under the SAE International six levels (0 to 5) of vehicle automation. At this level, the car can act autonomously, but requires the driver to monitor the driving at all times and be prepared to take control at a moment's notice. Autopilot is suitable only on limited-access highways, and sometimes will fail to detect lane markings and disengage itself. This system also does not detect pedestrians or cyclists, and while Autopilot detects motorcycles, there have been two instances of HW1 cars rear-ending motorcycles.
Elon Musk first discussed the Autopilot system publicly in 2013, noting "Autopilot is a good thing to have in planes, and we should have it in cars.".
All Tesla cars manufactured between September 2014 and October 2016 had the initial hardware (HW1) that supported Autopilot. On October 9, 2014, Tesla offered customers the ability to pre-purchase Autopilot capability within a "Tech Package" option. At that time Tesla stated Autopilot would include semi-autonomous drive and parking capabilities, and was not designed for self-driving.
Software enabling Autopilot was released in mid-October 2015 as part of Tesla software version 7.0. At that time, Tesla announced its goal to offer self-driving technology. Software version 7.1 then removed some features to discourage customers from engaging in risky behavior and added the Summon remote parking capability that can move the car forward and backward under remote human control without a driver in the car.
In March 2015, speaking at an Nvidia conference, Elon stated:
- "I don't think we have to worry about autonomous cars because it's a sort of a narrow form of AI. It's not something I think is very difficult. To do autonomous driving that is to a degree much safer than a person, is much easier than people think." "... I almost view it like a solved problem."
In December 2015, Musk predicted "complete autonomy" by 2018.
On August 31, 2016, Elon Musk announced Autopilot 8.0, which processes radar signals to create a coarse point cloud similar to Lidar to help navigate in low visibility, and even to 'see' in front of the car ahead of the Tesla car. In November 2016, Autopilot 8.0 was updated to have a more noticeable signal to the driver that it is engaged and to require drivers to touch the steering wheel more frequently. By November 2016, Autopilot had operated actively on HW1 vehicles for 300 million miles (500 million km) and 1.3 billion miles (2 billion km) in "shadow" (not active) mode.
Tesla states that as of October 2016, all new vehicles come with the necessary sensors and computing hardware, known as hardware version 2 (HW2), for future full self-driving. Tesla used the term "Enhanced Autopilot" to refer to HW2 capabilities that were not available in hardware version 1 (HW1), which include the ability to automatically change lanes without requiring driver input, transition from one freeway to another, and exit the freeway when your destination is near.
Autopilot software for HW2 cars came in February 2017. It included traffic-aware cruise control, autosteer on divided highways, autosteer on 'local roads' up to a speed of 35 mph or a specified number of mph over the local speed limit to a maximum of 45 mph. Software version 8.1 for HW2 arrived in June 2017, adding a new driving-assist algorithm, full-speed braking and handling parallel and perpendicular parking. Later releases offered smoother lane-keeping and less jerky acceleration and deceleration.
In August 2017, Tesla announced that HW2.5 included a secondary processor node to provide more computing power and additional wiring redundancy to slightly improve reliability; it also enabled dashcam and sentry mode capabilities.
In April 2019, Tesla started releasing an update to Navigate on Autopilot, which does not require lane change confirmation, but does require the driver to have hands on the steering wheel. The car will navigate freeway interchanges on its own, but the driver needs to supervise. The ability is available to those who have purchased Enhanced Autopilot or Full Self Driving Capability.
- I think we will be feature complete, full self-driving, this year. Meaning the car will be able to find you in a parking lot, pick you up and take you all the way to your destination without an intervention. This year. I would say I am of certain of that, that is not a question mark. However, people sometimes will extrapolate that to mean now it works with 100% certainty, requiring no observation, perfectly, this is not the case.
As of December 28, 2019, on Tesla's order page for "Full Self-Driving Capability" it states that:
- Coming later this year:
- Recognize and respond to traffic lights and stop signs
- Automatic driving on city streets.
In January 2020, he pushed back his projection to be feature complete to the end of 2020, and added that feature complete "doesn't mean that features are working well."
In July 2020, industry experts said that Musk and Tesla's autonomous driving plans lack credibility, and their goal of achieving level 5 autonomy by the end of 2020 isn't feasible.
In September 2020, Tesla reintroduced the term "Enhanced Autopilot" for a subset of features which provides full autopilot on highways, parking, and summon. Compared to this, Full Self Driving adds automation on city roads with traffic lights.
Tesla requires operators to monitor and remain responsible for the vehicle at all times, including when Autopilot is enabled. Autopilot features including self-driving functionality are classified as level 2. Tesla's owner's manual states that Autopilot should not be used on city streets or on roads where traffic conditions are constantly changing; however, some current full self-driving capabilities ("traffic and stop sign control (beta)"), and future full self-driving capabilities ("autosteer on city streets") are advertised for city streets.
|1.0||2014||Traffic-aware cruise control|
|1.0||2014||Lane departure warning|
|1.0||2014||Max speed||In 2017, changed to 90 mph (140 km/h)|
|1.0||2014||Summon||Requires FSD or Enhanced Autopilot|
|1.0||2015||Autopark||Requires FSD or Enhanced Autopilot|
|1.0||2014||Forward Collision Warning|
|2.0||2016||Navigate on Autopilot (Beta)||Requires FSD or Enhanced Autopilot
Navigation is on-ramp to off-ramp
|2.0||2019||Blind Spot Collision Warning Chime|
|2.0||2019||Lane Departure Avoidance|
|2.0||2019||Emergency Lane Departure Avoidance|
|2.0||2019||Smart Summon||Requires FSD or Enhanced Autopilot|
|2.0||2019||Automatic lane change||Requires FSD or Enhanced Autopilot[a][b]|
|3.0||2019[c]||Full Self-Driving hardware||[d][e]|
|3.0||2019||Traffic light/stop sign recognition||Requires FSD|
|3.0||2020||Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control (Beta)||Requires FSD
Requires driver confirmation
|3.0 (planned)||2020 (planned)||Autosteer on city streets||Requires FSD|
|3.0 (planned)||Future||Full Self-Driving||Requires FSD|
- Driver initiates the lane changing signal when safe then the system does the rest.
- Autosteer is disabled with a manual lane change.
- Year is continuously updated. Tesla initially claimed full self driving hardware in 2016.
- Tesla claims "full self driving capability" with future software updates.
- Upgrade from HW 2 or 2.5 to HW3 is free to those who have purchased FSD.
HW1, HW2, HW3 and all listed software versions
Autopilot-enabled cars receive Autopilot software updates wirelessly, as part of recurring Tesla software updates.
If Autopilot detects a potential front or side collision with another vehicle, bicycle or pedestrian within a distance of 525 feet (160 m), it sounds a warning. Autopilot has automatic emergency braking that detects objects that may hit the car and applies the brakes. The car may also automatically swerve out of the way to prevent a collision.
Autopilot includes a video display of some of what it sees around it. It displays driving lanes and vehicles in front, behind and on either side of it (in other lanes). It also displays lane markings and speed limits (via its cameras and what it knows from maps). On HW3, it displays stop signs and traffic signals. It distinguishes pedestrians, bicyclists/motorcyclists, small cars, and larger SUVs/trucks.
Front-facing cameras detect speed limit signs on HW1 vehicles and display the current limit on the dashboard or center display. Limits are compared against GPS data if no signs are present or if the vehicle is HW2 or HW2.5.
Traffic-aware cruise control
Also known as adaptive cruise control, traffic-aware cruise control has the ability to maintain a safe distance from the vehicle in front of it by accelerating and braking as that vehicle speeds up and slows down. It also slows on tight curves, on interstate ramps, and when a car enters or exits the road in front of it. It can be enabled at any speed between 0 mph and 90 mph. By default, it sets the limit at the current speed limit plus/minus a driver-specified offset, then adjusts its target speed according to changes in speed limits. If road conditions warrant, Autosteer and cruise control disengage and an audio and visual signal indicate that the driver must assume full control.
Autosteer steers the car to remain in whatever lane it is in (known as lane-keeping). It is able to safely change lanes when the driver taps the turn signal stalk. HW2 was limited to 90 mph (145 km/h) on highway roads or to five miles over the speed limit or 45 mph (72 km/h) on non-divided highways. If the driver ignores three audio warnings about controlling the steering wheel within an hour, Autopilot is disabled until the car is restarted.
HW1, HW2, HW3 with advanced software versions
Autopark parks the car in perpendicular or parallel parking spaces, with either nose or tail facing outward.
HW2, HW3 with advanced software versions
HW3 with advanced software versions
Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control (Beta)
When using Traffic-Aware Cruise Control or Autosteer, this feature recognizes and responds to traffic lights and stop signs. This feature will slow and eventually stop for stop signs and all detected traffic lights (regardless of color, or being off). To continue through a green light, the user must push down the gear selector once or briefly press the accelerator pedal.
Full self-driving capability
Tesla has made claims since 2016 that all new vehicles have the hardware necessary for full self driving; however free hardware upgrades have been required. Tesla is claiming that the current software will be upgraded to provide full self driving (at an unknown future date) without any need for additional hardware.
Need for LiDAR
There is controversy over whether LiDAR is needed for full self-driving capability. Tesla vehicles don't have LiDAR. Some news reports in 2019 state "practically everyone views [LiDAR] as an essential ingredient for self-driving cars" and "experts and proponents say it adds depth and vision where camera and radar alone fall short." However, Elon Musk has called LiDAR "stupid, expensive and unnecessary", and in 2019 researchers at Cornell University "[u]sing two inexpensive cameras on either side of a vehicle's windshield ... have discovered they can detect objects with nearly LiDAR's accuracy and at a fraction of the cost." Tesla also claims it has achieved close to LiDAR accuracy using just cameras.
|Hardware||Hardware 1||Hardware 2||Hardware 3|
|Initial availability date: Name||2014: Autopilot hardware 1||October 2016: Enhanced Autopilot hardware 2.0[a]||August 2017: Enhanced Autopilot hardware 2.5 (HW2.5)[b]||April 2019: Full self-driving computer (FSD) hardware 3[c]|
|Platform||MobilEye EyeQ3||NVIDIA DRIVE PX 2 AI computing platform||NVIDIA DRIVE PX 2 with secondary node enabled||Two identical Tesla-designed processors|
|Forward Radar||160 m (525 ft)||170 m (558 ft)|
|Front / Side Camera color filter array||N/A||RCCC||RCCB|
|Forward Cameras||1 monochrome with unknown range||3:|
|Forward Looking Side Cameras||N/A|
|Rearward Looking Side Cameras||N/A|
|Sonars||12 surrounding with 5 m (16 ft) range||12 surrounding with 8 m (26 ft) range|
- All cars sold after October 2016 are equipped with Hardware 2.0, which includes eight cameras (covering a complete 360° around the car), one forward-facing radar, and twelve sonars (also covering a complete 360°). Buyers may choose an extra-cost option to purchase either the "Enhanced Autopilot" or "Full Self-Driving" to enable features. Front and side collision mitigation features are standard on all cars.
- Also known as "Hardware 2.1"; includes added computing and wiring redundancy for improved reliability.
- Tesla described the previous computer as a supercomputer capable of full self driving.
Vehicles manufactured after late September 2014 are equipped with a camera mounted at the top of the windshield, forward looking radar in the lower grille and ultrasonic acoustic location sensors in the front and rear bumpers that provide a 360-degree view around the car. The computer is the Mobileye EyeQ3. This equipment allows the Tesla Model S to detect road signs, lane markings, obstacles, and other vehicles.
Auto lane change can be initiated by the driver turning on the lane changing signal when safe (due to ultrasonic 16-foot limited range capability), and then the system completes the lane change.
Upgrading from Hardware 1 to Hardware 2 is not offered as it would require substantial work and cost.
HW2, included in all vehicles manufactured after October 2016, includes an Nvidia Drive PX 2 GPU for CUDA based GPGPU computation. Tesla claimed that HW2 provided the necessary equipment to allow full self-driving capability at SAE Level 5. The hardware includes eight surround cameras and 12 ultrasonic sensors, in addition to forward-facing radar with enhanced processing capabilities. The Autopilot computer is replaceable to allow for future upgrades. The radar is able to observe beneath and ahead of the vehicle in front of the Tesla; the radar can see vehicles through heavy rain, fog or dust. Tesla claimed that the hardware was capable of processing 200 frames per second.
When "Enhanced Autopilot" was enabled in February 2017 by the v8.0 (17.5.36) software update, testing showed the system was limited to using one of the eight onboard cameras—the main forward-facing camera The v8.1 software update released a month later enabled a second camera, the narrow-angle forward-facing camera.
In August 2017, Tesla announced that HW2.5 included a secondary processor node to provide more computing power and additional wiring redundancy to slightly improve reliability; it also enabled dashcam and sentry mode capabilities.
According to Tesla's director of Artificial Intelligence Andrej Karpathy, as of Q3 2018, Tesla has developed large neural networks for Autopilot that cannot be used due to the lack of computational resources in current Tesla vehicles. HW3 provided the resources to allow for improved accuracy in predictions.
HW3 includes a custom Tesla-designed system on a chip. Tesla claimed that the new system would process 2,300 frames per second (fps), which is a 21x improvement in image processing compared to HW2.5, which is capable of 110 fps. The firm described it as a "neural network accelerator". Each chip is capable of 36 trillion operations per second, and there are two chips for redundancy. The company claimed that HW3 was necessary for "full self-driving", but not for "enhanced Autopilot" functions.
Tesla claims HW3 has 2.5× improved performance over HW2.5 with 1.25× higher power and 0.8× lower cost. HW3 features twelve ARM Cortex-A72 CPUs operating at 2.6 GHz, two Neural Network Accelerators operating at 2 GHz and a Mali GPU operating at 1 GHz.
According to Elon Musk, full autonomy is "really a software limitation: The hardware exists to create full autonomy, so it's really about developing advanced, narrow AI for the car to operate on." The Autopilot development focus is on "increasingly sophisticated neural nets that can operate in reasonably sized computers in the car". According to Musk, "the car will learn over time", including from other cars.
Comparisons and awards
In 2018, Consumer Reports rated Tesla Autopilot as second best out of four (Cadillac, Tesla, Nissan, Volvo) "partially automated driving systems". Autopilot scored highly for its capabilities and ease of use, but was worse at keeping the driver engaged than the other manufacturers' systems. Consumer Reports also found multiple problems with Autopilot's automatic lane change function, such as cutting too closely in front of other cars and passing on the right.
In 2018, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety compared Tesla, BMW, Mercedes and Volvo "advanced driver assistance systems" and stated that the Tesla Model 3 experienced the fewest incidents of crossing over a lane line, touching a lane line, or disengaging.
In 2019, Tesla Autopilot's navigate-on-autopilot feature won the Connected Car Innovation Award in Germany for "best innovative automotive solution".
- Highs: Best user interface, most versatile, extremely capable.
- Lows: Dramatic steering inputs when it makes an occasional mistake, no more hands-free capability.
- Verdict: One of the best, but can it really evolve all the way to self-driving?
In October 2020, the European New Car Assessment Program evaluated automated driving technologies for cars from 10 car manufacturers. It rated the Tesla Model 3 Autopilot as the highest of all (95%) on "safety backup", but the lowest of all (35%) on "assistance competence", resulting in an overall "moderate" score.
Also in October 2020, Consumer Reports evaluated 17 driver assistance systems, and concluded that Tesla Autopilot was "a distant second" behind Cadillac's Super Cruise. Autopilot was ranked first in the "Capabilities and Performance" and the "Ease of Use" category; but it tied for last place in "Clear When Safe to Use" and tied for second to last place in "Keeping the driver engaged".
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has cited Tesla's Autopilot as a probable cause in at least three deadly crashes. The NTSB has criticized Tesla for failing to foresee and prevent "predictable abuse" of Autopilot. The Center for Auto Safety and Consumer Watchdog have called for federal and state investigations into Autopilot and Tesla's marketing of the technology, which they believe is "dangerously misleading and deceptive", giving consumers the false impression that their vehicles are self-driving or autonomous. UK safety experts have called Tesla's Autopilot "especially misleading." A 2019 IIHS study showed that the name "Autopilot" causes more drivers to misperceive behaviors such as texting or taking a nap to be safe, versus similar level 2 driver-assistance systems from other car companies. Tesla's Autopilot and full self-driving features have also been criticized in a May 2020 report on "autonowashing: the greenwashing of vehicle automation".
Drivers have been found sleeping at the wheel and driving under the influence of alcohol with Autopilot engaged. Tesla hasn't implemented more robust driver monitoring features that could prevent distracted and inattentive driving.
Detecting stationary vehicles at speed
Autopilot may not detect stationary vehicles; the manual states: "Traffic-Aware Cruise Control cannot detect all objects and may not brake/decelerate for stationary vehicles, especially in situations when you are driving over 50 mph (80 km/h) and a vehicle you are following moves out of your driving path and a stationary vehicle or object is in front of you instead." This has led to numerous crashes with stopped emergency vehicles. This is the same problem that any car equipped with just adaptive cruise control or automated emergency braking has (for example, Volvo Pilot Assist).
Dangerous and unexpected behavior
In a 2019 Bloomberg survey, hundreds of Tesla owners reported dangerous behaviors with Autopilot, such as phantom braking, veering out of lane, or failing to stop for road hazards. Autopilot users have also reported the software crashing and turning off suddenly, collisions with off ramp barriers, radar failures, unexpected swerving, tailgating, and uneven speed changes.
Ars Technica notes that the brake system tends to initiate later than some drivers expect. One driver claimed that Tesla's Autopilot failed to brake, resulting in collisions, but Tesla pointed out that the driver deactivated the cruise control of the car prior to the crash. Ars Technica also notes that while lane changes may be semi-automatic (if Autopilot is on, and the vehicle detects slow moving cars or if it is required to stay on route, the car may automatically change lanes without any driver input), the driver must show the car that he or she is paying attention by touching the steering wheel before the car makes the change.
Regulation and liability
Some industry experts have raised questions about the legal status of autonomous driving in the U.S. and whether Tesla owners would violate current state regulations when using the Autopilot function. The few states that have passed laws allowing autonomous cars on the road limit their use for testing purposes, not for use by the general public. Also, there are questions about the liability for autonomous cars in case there is a mistake. A Tesla spokesman said there is "nothing in our autopilot system that is in conflict with current regulations...We are not getting rid of the pilot. This is about releasing the driver from tedious tasks so they can focus and provide better input." Google's director of self-driving cars said he does not think there is a regulatory block as long as the self-driving vehicle meets crash-test and other safety standards. A spokesman for the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said that "any autonomous vehicle would need to meet applicable federal motor vehicle safety standards" and the NHTSA "will have the appropriate policies and regulations in place to ensure the safety of this type of vehicles."
Tesla's Autopilot was the subject of a class action suit brought in 2017 that claimed the second-generation Enhanced Autopilot system was "dangerously defective." The suit was settled in 2018; owners who had paid US$5,000 (equivalent to $5,327 in 2019) in 2016 and 2017 to equip their cars with the updated Autopilot software were compensated between US$20 and US$280 for the delay in implementing Autopilot 2.0.
In July 2020, a German court ruled that Tesla made exaggerated promises about its Autopilot technology, and that the "Autopilot" name created the false impression that the car can drive itself.
In 2016, data after 47 million miles of driving in Autopilot mode showed the probability of an accident was at least 50% lower when using Autopilot. During the investigation into the fatal crash of May 2016 in Williston, Florida, NHTSA released a preliminary report in January 2017 stating "the Tesla vehicles' crash rate dropped by almost 40 percent after Autosteer installation.":10 Disputing this, in 2019, a private company, Quality Control Systems, released their report analyzing the same data, stating the NHTSA conclusion was "not well-founded". Quality Control Systems' analysis of the data showed the crash rate (measured in the rate of airbag deployments per million miles of travel) actually increased from 0.76 to 1.21 after the installation of Autosteer.:9
In February 2020, Andrej Karpathy, Tesla's head of AI and computer vision, stated that: Tesla cars have driven 3 billion miles on Autopilot, of which 1 billion have been driven using Navigate on Autopilot; Tesla cars have performed 200,000 automated lane changes; and 1.2 million Smart Summon sessions have been initiated with Tesla cars. He also states that Tesla cars are avoiding pedestrian accidents at a rate of tens to hundreds per day.
Tesla's self-reported quarterly summary statistics for vehicle safety are:
|Safety Category||2018 Q3||2018 Q4||2019 Q1||2019 Q2||2019 Q3||2019 Q4||2020 Q1||2020 Q2||2020 Q3|
|One accident for every X million miles driven in which drivers had Autopilot engaged.||3.34||2.91||2.87||3.27||4.34||3.07||4.68||4.53||4.59|
|One accident for every X million miles driven in which drivers did not have Autopilot engaged, but with active safety features engaged.||1.92||1.58||1.76||2.19||2.70||2.10||1.99||2.27||2.42|
|One accident for every X million miles driven without Autopilot engaged and also without active safety features engaged.||2.02||1.25||1.26||1.41||1.82||1.64||1.42||1.56||1.79|
As of October 2019, there are five fatalities involving Tesla's Autopilot, though several incidents where Autopilot use was suspected remain outstanding.
Handan, China (January 20, 2016)
On January 20, 2016, the driver of a Tesla Model S in Handan, China, was killed when his car crashed into a stationary truck. The Tesla was following a car in the far left lane of a multi-lane highway; the car in front moved to the right lane to avoid a truck stopped on the left shoulder, and the Tesla, which the driver's father believes was in Autopilot mode, did not slow before colliding with the stopped truck. According to footage captured by a dashboard camera, the stationary street sweeper on the left side of the expressway partially extended into the far left lane, and the driver did not appear to respond to the unexpected obstacle.
In September 2016, the media reported the driver's family had filed a lawsuit in July against the Tesla dealer who sold the car. The family's lawyer stated the suit was intended "to let the public know that self-driving technology has some defects. We are hoping Tesla when marketing its products, will be more cautious. Do not just use self-driving as a selling point for young people." Tesla released a statement which said they "have no way of knowing whether or not Autopilot was engaged at the time of the crash" since the car telemetry could not be retrieved remotely due to damage caused by the crash. In 2018, the lawsuit was stalled because telemetry was recorded locally to a SD card and was not able to be given to Tesla, who provided a decoding key to a third party for independent review. Tesla stated that "while the third-party appraisal is not yet complete, we have no reason to believe that Autopilot on this vehicle ever functioned other than as designed." Chinese media later reported that the family sent the information from that card to Tesla, which admitted autopilot was engaged two minutes before the crash. Tesla since then removed the term "Autopilot" from its Chinese website.
Williston, Florida (May 7, 2016)
The first U.S. Autopilot fatality took place in Williston, Florida, on May 7, 2016. The driver was killed in a crash with an 18-wheel tractor-trailer. By late June 2016, the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) opened a formal investigation into the fatal autonomous accident, working with the Florida Highway Patrol. According to the NHTSA, preliminary reports indicate the crash occurred when the tractor-trailer made a left turn in front of the 2015 Tesla model S at an intersection on a non-controlled access highway, and the car failed to apply the brakes. The car continued to travel after passing under the truck's trailer. The diagnostic log of the Tesla indicated it was traveling at a speed of 74 mi/h (119 km/h) when it collided with and traveled under the trailer, which was not equipped with a side underrun protection system.:12 The underride collision sheared off the Tesla's glasshouse, destroying everything above the beltline, and caused fatal injuries to the driver.:6–7; 13 In the approximately nine seconds after colliding with the trailer, the Tesla traveled another 886.5 feet (270.2 m) and came to rest after colliding with two chain-link fences and a utility pole.:7; 12
The NHTSA's preliminary evaluation was opened to examine the design and performance of any automated driving systems in use at the time of the crash, which involves a population of an estimated 25,000 Model S cars. On July 8, 2016, the NHTSA requested Tesla Inc. to hand over to the agency detailed information about the design, operation and testing of its Autopilot technology. The agency also requested details of all design changes and updates to Autopilot since its introduction, and Tesla's planned updates scheduled for the next four months.
According to Tesla, "neither autopilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor-trailer against a brightly lit sky, so the brake was not applied." The car attempted to drive full speed under the trailer, "with the bottom of the trailer impacting the windshield of the Model S." Tesla also stated that this was Tesla's first known Autopilot-related death in over 130 million miles (208 million km) driven by its customers while Autopilot was activated. According to Tesla there is a fatality every 94 million miles (150 million km) among all type of vehicles in the U.S. It is estimated that billions of miles will need to be traveled before Tesla Autopilot can claim to be safer than humans with statistical significance. Researchers say that Tesla and others need to release more data on the limitations and performance of automated driving systems if self-driving cars are to become safe and understood enough for mass-market use.
The truck's driver told the Associated Press that he could hear a Harry Potter movie playing in the crashed car, and said the car was driving so quickly that "he went so fast through my trailer I didn't see him." "It was still playing when he died and snapped a telephone pole a quarter-mile down the road." According to the Florida Highway Patrol, they found in the wreckage an aftermarket portable DVD player. It is not possible to watch videos on the Model S touchscreen display. A laptop computer was recovered during the post-crash examination of the wreck, along with an adjustable vehicle laptop mount attached to the front passenger's seat frame. The NHTSA concluded the laptop was probably mounted and the driver may have been distracted at the time of the crash.:17–19; 21
Collision Between a Car Operating With Automated Vehicle Control Systems and a Tractor-Semitrailer Truck Near Williston, Florida | May 7, 2017 | Accident Report NTSB/HAR-17/02 PB2017-102600:33
In January 2017, the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigations (ODI) released a preliminary evaluation, finding that the driver in the crash had seven seconds to see the truck and identifying no defects in the Autopilot system; the ODI also found that the Tesla car crash rate dropped by 40 percent after Autosteer installation, but later also clarified that it did not assess the effectiveness of this technology or whether it was engaged in its crash rate comparison. The NHTSA Special Crash Investigation team published its report in January 2018. According to the report, for the drive leading up to the crash, the driver engaged Autopilot for 37 minutes and 26 seconds, and the system provided 13 "hands not detected" alerts, to which the driver responded after an average delay of 16 seconds.:24 The report concluded "Regardless of the operational status of the Tesla's ADAS technologies, the driver was still responsible for maintaining ultimate control of the vehicle. All evidence and data gathered concluded that the driver neglected to maintain complete control of the Tesla leading up to the crash.":25 In July 2016, the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) announced it had opened a formal investigation into the fatal accident while Autopilot was engaged. The NTSB is an investigative body that only has the power to make policy recommendations. An agency spokesman said, "It's worth taking a look and seeing what we can learn from that event, so that as that automation is more widely introduced we can do it in the safest way possible." The NTSB opens annually about 25 to 30 highway investigations. In September 2017, the NTSB released its report, determining that "the probable cause of the Williston, Florida, crash was the truck driver's failure to yield the right of way to the car, combined with the car driver's inattention due to overreliance on vehicle automation, which resulted in the car driver's lack of reaction to the presence of the truck. Contributing to the car driver's overreliance on the vehicle automation was its operational design, which permitted his prolonged disengagement from the driving task and his use of the automation in ways inconsistent with guidance and warnings from the manufacturer."
Mountain View, California (March 23, 2018)
On March 23, 2018, a second U.S. Autopilot fatality occurred in Mountain View, California. The crash occurred just before 9:30 A.M. on southbound US 101 at the carpool lane exit for southbound Highway 85, at a concrete barrier where the left-hand carpool lane offramp separates from 101. After the Model X crashed into the narrow concrete barrier, it was struck by two following vehicles, and then it caught on fire.
Both the NHTSA and NTSB are investigating the March 2018 crash. Another driver of a Model S demonstrated that Autopilot appeared to be confused by the road surface marking in April 2018. The gore ahead of the barrier is marked by diverging solid white lines (a vee-shape) and the Autosteer feature of the Model S appeared to mistakenly use the left-side white line instead of the right-side white line as the lane marking for the far left lane, which would have led the Model S into the same concrete barrier had the driver not taken control. Ars Technica concluded "that as Autopilot gets better, drivers could become increasingly complacent and pay less and less attention to the road."
In a corporate blog post, Tesla noted the impact attenuator separating the offramp from US 101 had been previously crushed and not replaced prior to the Model X crash on March 23. The post also stated that Autopilot was engaged at the time of the crash, and the driver's hands had not been detected manipulating the steering wheel for six seconds before the crash. Vehicle data showed the driver had five seconds and a 150 metres (490 ft) "unobstructed view of the concrete divider, ... but the vehicle logs show that no action was taken." The NTSB investigation had been focused on the damaged impact attenuator and the vehicle fire after the collision, but after it was reported the driver had complained about the Autopilot functionality, the NTSB announced it would also investigate "all aspects of this crash including the driver's previous concerns about the autopilot." A NTSB spokesman stated the organization "is unhappy with the release of investigative information by Tesla". Elon Musk dismissed the criticism, tweeting that NTSB was "an advisory body" and that "Tesla releases critical crash data affecting public safety immediately & always will. To do otherwise would be unsafe." In response, NTSB removed Tesla as a party to the investigation on April 11.
NTSB released a preliminary report on June 7, 2018, which provided the recorded telemetry of the Model X and other factual details. Autopilot was engaged continuously for almost nineteen minutes prior to the crash. In the minute before the crash, the driver's hands were detected on the steering wheel for 34 seconds in total, but his hands were not detected for the six seconds immediately preceding the crash. Seven seconds before the crash, the Tesla began to steer to the left and was following a lead vehicle; four seconds before the crash, the Tesla was no longer following a lead vehicle; and during the three seconds before the crash, the Tesla's speed increased to 70.8 mi/h (113.9 km/h). The driver was wearing a seatbelt and was pulled from the vehicle before it was engulfed in flames.
The crash attenuator had been previously damaged on March 12 and had not been replaced at the time of the Tesla crash. The driver involved in the accident on March 12 collided with the crash attenuator at more than 75 mph (121 km/h) and was treated for minor injuries; in comparison, the driver of the Tesla collided with the collapsed attenuator at a slower speed and died from blunt force trauma. After the accident on March 12, the California Highway Patrol failed to report the collapsed attenuator to Caltrans as required. Caltrans was not aware of the damage until March 20, and the attenuator was not replaced until March 26 because a spare was not immediately available.:1–4 This specific attenuator had required repair more often than any other crash attenuator in the Bay Area, and maintenance records indicated that repair of this attenuator was delayed by up to three months after being damaged.:4–5 As a result, the NTSB released a Safety Recommendation Report on September 9, 2019, asking Caltrans to develop and implement a plan to guarantee timely repair of traffic safety hardware.
At a NTSB meeting held on February 25, 2020, the board concluded the crash was caused by a combination of the limitations of the Tesla Autopilot system, the driver's over-reliance on Autopilot, and driver distraction likely from playing a video game on his phone. The vehicle's ineffective monitoring of driver engagement was cited as a contributing factor, and the inoperability of the crash attenuator contributed to the driver's injuries. As an advisory agency, NTSB does not have regulatory power; however, NTSB made several recommendations to two regulatory agencies. The NTSB recommendations to the NHTSA included: expanding the scope of the New Car Assessment Program to include testing of forward collision avoidance systems; determining if "the ability to operate [Tesla Autopilot-equipped vehicles] outside the intended operational design domain pose[s] an unreasonable risk to safety"; and developing driver monitoring system performance standards. The NTSB submitted recommendations to the OSHA relating to distracted driving awareness and regulation. In addition, NTSB issued recommendations to manufacturers of portable electronic devices (to develop lock-out mechanisms to prevent driver-distracting functions) and to Apple (banning the nonemergency use of portable electronic devices while driving).
Several NTSB recommendations previously issued to NHTSA, DOT, and Tesla were reclassified to "Open—Unacceptable Response". These included H-17-41 (recommendation to Tesla to incorporate system safeguards that limit the use of automated vehicle control systems to design conditions) and H-17-42 (recommendation to Tesla to more effectively sense the driver's level of engagement).
Kanagawa, Japan (April 29, 2018)
On April 29, 2018, a Tesla Model X operating on Autopilot struck and killed a pedestrian in Kanagawa, Japan, after the driver had fallen asleep. According to a lawsuit filed in federal court in Northern California in April 2020, the Tesla Model X accelerated from 24 km/h to approximately 38 km/h prior to impact, and then crashed into a van and motorcycles, killing a 44-year-old man. The lawsuit claims the accident occurred due to flaws in Tesla's Autopilot system, such as inadequate monitoring to detect inattentive drivers and an inability to handle unforeseen traffic situations.
Delray Beach, Florida (March 1, 2019)
In the morning of March 1, 2019, a Tesla Model 3 driving southbound on US 441/SR 7 in Delray Beach, Florida struck a semi-trailer truck that was making a left-hand turn to northbound SR 7 out of a private driveway at Pero Family Farms; the Tesla underrode the trailer, and the force of the impact sheared off the greenhouse of the Model 3, resulting in the death of the Tesla driver. The driver of the Tesla had engaged Autopilot approximately 10 seconds before the collision and preliminary telemetry showed the vehicle did not detect the driver's hands on the wheel for the eight seconds immediately preceding the collision. The driver of the semi-trailer truck was not cited. Both the NHTSA and NTSB dispatched investigators to the scene.
In May 2019 the NTSB issued a preliminary report that determined that neither the driver of the Tesla or the Autopilot system executed evasive maneuvers. The circumstances of this crash were similar to the fatal underride crash of a Tesla Model S in 2016 near Williston, Florida; in its 2017 report detailing the investigation of that earlier crash, NTSB recommended that Autopilot be used only on limited-access roads (i.e., freeway),:33 which Tesla did not implement.
Culver City, California (January 22, 2018)
On January 22, 2018, a 2014 Tesla Model S crashed into a fire truck parked on the side of the I-405 freeway in Culver City, California, while traveling at a speed exceeding 50 mph (80 km/h) and the driver survived with no injuries. The driver told the Culver City Fire Department that he was using Autopilot. The fire truck and a California Highway Patrol vehicle were parked diagonally across the left emergency lane and high-occupancy vehicle lane of the southbound 405, blocking off the scene of an earlier accident, with emergency lights flashing.
According to a post-accident interview, the driver stated he was drinking coffee, eating a bagel, and maintaining contact with the steering wheel while resting his hand on his knee.:3 During the 30-mile (48 km) trip, which lasted 66 minutes, the Autopilot system was engaged for slightly more than 29 minutes; of the 29 minutes, hands were detected on the steering wheel for only 78 seconds in total. Hands were detected applying torque to the steering wheel for only 51 seconds over the nearly 14 minutes immediately preceding the crash.:9 The Tesla had been following a lead vehicle in the high-occupancy vehicle lane at approximately 21 mph (34 km/h); when the lead vehicle moved to the right to avoid the fire truck, approximately three or four seconds prior to impact, the Tesla's traffic-aware cruise control system began to accelerate the Tesla to its preset speed of 80 mph (130 km/h). When the impact occurred, the Tesla had accelerated to 31 mph (50 km/h).:10 The Autopilot system issued a forward collision warning half a second before the impact, but did not engage the automatic emergency braking (AEB) system, and the driver did not manually intervene by braking or steering. Because Autopilot requires agreement between the radar and visual cameras to initiate AEB, the system was challenged due to the specific scenario (where a lead vehicle detours around a stationary object) and the limited time available after the forward collision warning.:11
Several news outlets started reporting that Autopilot may not detect stationary vehicles at highway speeds and it cannot detect some objects. Raj Rajkumar, who studies autonomous driving systems at Carnegie Mellon University, believes the radars used for Autopilot are designed to detect moving objects, but are "not very good in detecting stationary objects". Both NTSB and NHTSA dispatched teams to investigate the crash. Hod Lipson, director of Columbia University's Creative Machines Lab, faulted the diffusion of responsibility concept: "If you give the same responsibility to two people, they each will feel safe to drop the ball. Nobody has to be 100%, and that's a dangerous thing."
In August 2019, the NTSB released its accident brief for the accident. HAB-19-07 concluded the driver of the Tesla was at fault due to "inattention and overreliance on the vehicle's advanced driver assistance system", but added the design of the Tesla Autopilot system "permitted the driver to disengage from the driving task".:13–14 After the earlier crash in Williston, the NTSB issued a safety recommendation to "[d]evelop applications to more effectively sense the driver's level of engagement and alert the driver when engagement is lacking while automated vehicle control systems are in use." Among the manufacturers that the recommendation was issued to, only Tesla has failed to issue a response.:12–13
South Jordan, Utah (May 11, 2018)
In the evening of May 11, 2018, a 2016 Tesla Model S with Autopilot engaged crashed into the rear of a fire truck that was stopped in the southbound lane at a red light in South Jordan, Utah, at the intersection of SR-154 and SR-151. The Tesla was moving at an estimated 60 mi/h (97 km/h) and did not appear to brake or attempt to avoid the impact, according to witnesses. The driver of the Tesla, who survived the impact with a broken foot, admitted she was looking at her phone before the crash. The NHTSA dispatched investigators to South Jordan. According to telemetry data recovered after the crash, the driver repeatedly did not touch the wheel, including during the 80 seconds immediately preceding the crash, and only touched the brake pedal "fractions of a second" before the crash. The driver was cited by police for "failure to keep proper lookout". The Tesla had slowed to 55 mi/h (89 km/h) to match a vehicle ahead of it, and after that vehicle changed lanes, accelerated to 60 mi/h (97 km/h) in the 3.5 seconds preceding the crash.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk criticized news coverage of the South Jordan crash, tweeting that "a Tesla crash resulting in a broken ankle is front page news and the ~40,000 people who died in US auto accidents alone in [the] past year get almost no coverage", additionally pointing out that "[a]n impact at that speed usually results in severe injury or death", but later conceding that Autopilot "certainly needs to be better & we work to improve it every day". In September 2018, the driver of the Tesla sued the manufacturer, alleging the safety features designed to "ensure the vehicle would stop on its own in the event of an obstacle being present in the path ... failed to engage as advertised." According to the driver, the Tesla failed to provide an audible or visual warning before the crash.
Moscow (August 10, 2019)
On the night of August 10, 2019, a Tesla Model 3 driving in the left-hand lane on the Moscow Ring Road in Moscow, Russia crashed into a parked tow truck with a corner protruding into the lane and subsequently burst into flames. According to the driver, the vehicle was traveling at the speed limit of 100 km/h (62 mph) with Autopilot activated; he also claimed his hands were on the wheel, but was not paying attention at the time of the crash. All occupants were able to exit the vehicle before it caught on fire; they were transported to the hospital. Injuries included a broken leg (driver) and bruises (his children).
The force of the collision was enough to push the tow truck forward into the central dividing wall, as recorded by a surveillance camera. Passersby also captured several videos of the fire and explosions after the accident, these videos also show the tow truck that the Tesla crashed into had been moved, suggesting the explosions of the Model 3 happened later.
Taiwan (June 1, 2020)
Traffic cameras captured the moment when a Tesla slammed into an overturned cargo truck in Taiwan on June 1, 2020. The driver was uninjured and told emergency responders that the car was in Autopilot mode. The driver reportedly told authorities that he saw the truck and manually hit the brakes too late to avoid the crash, which is apparently indicated on the video by a puff of white smoke coming from the tires.
- By (2019-03-04). "Does Tesla's Autosteer Make Cars Less Safe?". Hackaday. Retrieved 2019-03-05.
- "Q3 2018 Vehicle Safety Report". www.tesla.com. Retrieved 2018-10-04.
- "Tesla Vehicle Safety Report". www.tesla.com. 2019-01-08. Retrieved 2019-01-08.
In the 4th quarter, we registered one accident for every 2.91 million miles driven in which drivers had Autopilot engaged. For those driving without Autopilot, we registered one accident for every 1.58 million miles driven. By comparison, NHTSA's most recent data shows that in the United States there is an automobile crash every 436,000 miles.
- Monticello, Mike (2020-10-28). "Cadillac's Super Cruise Outperforms Other Driving Assistance Systems". Consumer Reports.
- Golson, Jordan; Bohn, Dieter (2016-10-19). "All new Tesla cars now have hardware for 'full self-driving capabilities'". The Verge. Retrieved 2016-10-22.
- Hawkins, Andrew J. (2019-04-24). "It's Elon Musk vs. everyone else in the race for fully driverless cars". The Verge. Retrieved 2020-04-29.
- Cuneo, Elisabeth (April 8, 2020). "Navigant Research recognizes four leaders in the development of automated driving system". Autonomous Vehicle Technology. Archived from the original on 2020-06-24.(Registration required)
- Golson, Jordan (2016-04-27). "Volvo autonomous car engineer calls Tesla's Autopilot a 'wannabe'". The Verge. Retrieved 2016-07-01.
- Korosec, Kirsten (2015-12-15). "Elon Musk Says Tesla Vehicles Will Drive Themselves in Two Years". Fortune. Retrieved 2016-07-01.
- Abuelsamid, Sam (2016-07-01). "Tesla Autopilot Fatality Shows Why Lidar And V2V Will Be Necessary For Autonomous Cars". Forbes. Retrieved 2016-07-01.
- Lambert, Fred (2016-11-15). "Tesla Autopilot significantly improved pedestrian detection in v8 update tests show, now renders humans". Electrek. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
- "Motorcycle rear-ending raises questions on Tesla vehicle type approval in Europe". New Atlas. Retrieved 2016-12-21.
- Ohnsman, Alan (2013-05-08). "Tesla CEO Talking With Google About 'Autopilot' Systems". Retrieved 2019-06-28.
- "Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability". www.tesla.com. Tesla. 2019-02-13. Retrieved 2020-03-02.
- "Riding shotgun in Tesla's fastest car ever". Engadget. 2014-10-09. Retrieved 2014-10-10.
- "Tesla D is, as expected, an AWD Model S but new autopilot features surprise". AutoblogGreen. Retrieved 2014-10-10.
- White, Joseph B. (2014-10-10). "Tesla Aims to Leapfrog Rivals". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2015-03-21.
- "Dual Motor Model S and Autopilot". Tesla. 2014-10-10. Archived from the original on 2019-12-06. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
Our goal with the introduction of this new hardware and software is not to enable driverless cars, which are still years away from becoming a reality. Our system is called Autopilot because it's similar to systems that pilots use to increase comfort and safety when conditions are clear. Tesla's Autopilot is a way to relieve drivers of the most boring and potentially dangerous aspects of road travel – but the driver is still responsible for, and ultimately in control of, the car.
- Howell, Donna (2015-08-17). "Tesla, Mobileye Rev Up on Future of Self-Driving Car". Investors.com. Retrieved 2015-12-16.
- Bhuiyan, Johana (2016-07-26). "In the wake of a fatal crash, Tesla will quit using Mobileye's chips for Autopilot vision". ReCode. Retrieved 2016-07-26.
- Gitlin, Jonathan M. (2016-09-15). "Mobileye spills the beans: Tesla was dropped because of safety concerns". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2016-11-14.
- Nelson, Gabe (2015-10-14). "Tesla beams down 'autopilot' mode to Model S". Automotive News. Retrieved 2015-10-19.
- "Your Autopilot has arrived". www.tesla.com. 2015-10-14. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
- "Enhancing Safety and Convenience with Summon". Tesla Motors. 2016-02-08. Retrieved 2016-04-18.
- Zhang, Benjamin (2016-01-10). "ELON MUSK: In 2 years your Tesla will be able to drive from New York to LA and find you". Automotive News. Retrieved 2016-01-12.
- "Autopilot - Summon". Tesla Motors – via Vimeo.
- Opening Keynote at GTC 2015: Leaps in Visual Computing, retrieved 2020-06-13
- Opening Keynote at GTC 2015: Leaps in Visual Computing, retrieved 2020-06-13
- "Driverless cars show the limits of today's AI". The Economist. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 2020-06-14.
- Tesla to publish details of v8.0 with “Major improvements to Autopilot” later today August 31, 2016
- "Elon Musk explains Tesla Autopilot's new capacity to see ahead of the car in front of you". Electrek. Retrieved 2016-09-11.
- Tesla’s Autopilot Vindicated With 40% Drop in Crashes Bloomberg, January 19, 2017
- "Automated Flight Controls" (PDF). Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved 2014-02-20.
While the autopilot relieves you from manually manipulating the flight controls, you must maintain vigilance over the system to ensure that it performs the intended functions and the aircraft remains within acceptable parameters of altitudes, airspeeds, and airspace limits.
- Lambert, Fred (2016-11-13). "Tesla has now 1.3 billion miles of Autopilot data going into its new self-driving program". Electrek. Retrieved 2016-11-13.
- Golson, Jordan (2016-10-19). "All new Tesla cars now have hardware for 'full self-driving capabilities'". The Verge. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
- Gene (2016-10-20). "Tesla to roll out 'Enhanced Autopilot' that uses new self-driving 'Hardware 2'". TESLARATI. Retrieved 2019-05-15.
- Lambert, Fred (2017-02-15). "Tesla enables Autosteer on 'local roads' for new Enhanced Autopilot vehicles". Electrek. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
- "First look at Tesla's latest Autopilot 2.0 'smooth as silk' update [Video]". Retrieved 2017-06-14.
- "Discover Software Version 9.0". www.tesla.com. 2018-10-05. Retrieved 2019-09-21.
Dashcam is only available for Model S and Model X cars manufactured after August 2017...
- Lambert, Frederic (August 9, 2017). "Tesla has a new Autopilot '2.5' hardware suite with more computing power for autonomous driving". electrek.co. Retrieved 15 February 2018.
- "FSD Chip - Tesla". WikiChip. Retrieved 2020-03-17.
- "Tesla's New Chip Holds the Key to 'Full Self-Driving'". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2020-07-06.
- "All Tesla cars being built today have the hardware necessary for full self-driving". Twitter. Retrieved 2020-10-18.
- "Introducing a More Seamless Navigate on Autopilot". www.tesla.com. 2019-04-03. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
- "Tesla adjusts Autopilot to comply with new EU regulations". Engadget.
- "Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Equipment and Parts which can be Fitted and/or be Used on Wheeled Vehicles and the Conditions for Reciprocal Recognition of Approvals Granted on the Basis of these United Nations Regulations" (PDF). United Nations. 7 November 2018.
- "First look at Tesla v10 software update features". evannex.com. Retrieved 2019-09-19.
- "Tesla Autopilot & Lane Change Improvements in Tesla Software V10 – CleanTechnica Review". CleanTechnica. 2019-09-17. Retrieved 2019-09-20.
- Keeney, Tasha; Analyst, A. R. K. "On the Road to Full Autonomy With Elon Musk – FYI Podcast". ARK Investment Management. Retrieved 2020-01-10 – via Starts at 9:50 into podcast.
- Lambert, Fred (2019-02-20). "Tesla's Self-Driving system is coming by the end of the year but will require driver oversight, says Elon Musk". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-01-10.
- Elon Musk Podcast Feb 2019 Full, retrieved 2020-01-10
- "Design Your Model 3 | Tesla". www.tesla.com. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
- Weintraub, Seth (2019-02-28). "Tesla says 'Automatic driving on city streets' including responding to traffic lights/stop signs coming this year". Electrek. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
- "Elon Musk: Full Self Driving May Be 'Feature Complete' But That 'Doesn't Mean Features Are Working Well'". Jalopnik. Retrieved 2020-05-05.
- Vanderwerp, Dave (2020-04-30). "Tesla Update Includes Automatic Slowing for Stop Signs, Lights (Even Green Ones)". Car and Driver. Retrieved 2020-05-05.
- "Tesla's plan for Level 5 not feasible, experts say". Automotive News. 2020-07-20. Retrieved 2020-07-20.
- "Tesla Autopilot Innovation Comes From Team Of ~300 Jedi Engineers – Interview With Elon Musk". CleanTechnica. 2020-08-15. Retrieved 2020-08-16.
- Lambert, Fred (2020-09-19). "Tesla reintroduces 'Enhanced Autopilot' - offering cheaper alternative to 'Full Self-Driving'". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-09-19.
- "Enhanced Autopilot is BACK!!". Tesla Motors Club. Retrieved 2020-09-19.
- "r/teslamotors - Enhanced Autopilot option is back... $4k". reddit. Retrieved 2020-09-19.
- "Elon Musk: FSD beta rollout happening tonight. Will be extremely slow & cautious, as it should". Twitter. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
- Baldwin, Roberto (2020-10-20). "Elon Musk Says Autopilot Self-Driving Beta to Start Tonight". Car and Driver. Retrieved 2020-11-01.
- "NTSB Finds Tesla Partly to Blame in Fatal Self-Driving Car Crash". September 22, 2017.
- "MODEL S OWNER'S MANUAL" (PDF). Retrieved 2020-11-07.
Traffic-Aware Cruise Control is primarily intended for driving on dry, straight roads, such as highways and freeways. It should not be used on city streets.
- "NTSB Finds Tesla Partly to Blame in Fatal Self-Driving Car Crash". September 22, 2017.
While Tesla explicitly informed Model S owners that Autopilot should only be used on limited-access highways, it did not incorporate protections against its use on other types of roads.
- "MODEL Y OWNER'S MANUAL" (PDF). Retrieved 2020-11-07.
Do not use Autosteer on city streets, in construction zones, or in areas where bicyclists or pedestrians may be present.
- "Tesla Support: Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability".
- "Autopilot, Processors and Hardware – MCU & HW Demystified | TeslaTap". December 2019. Archived from the original on 2020-01-12. Retrieved 2020-01-12.
- "Full Self-Driving Hardware on All Cars". 2017-08-23. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
- "Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability". www.tesla.com. 2019-02-13. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
- Anthony, Mike (2014-10-03). "UPDATE: Tesla Model S Now With Driver Assist Features". Inside EVs.
- "Model X Owner's Manual 8.0, page 94" (PDF). Tesla. 2017-08-23. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
- Tesla (2018-12-20). "Model 3 Owner's Manual" (PDF). Tesla. Retrieved 2019-03-01.
- Loveday, Steven (2017-05-07). "Tesla Autopilot Update Bumps Autosteer Speed Up To 90 MPH". Inside Evs.
- Lambert, Fred (2017-05-06). "Tesla releases important new Autopilot update removing Autosteer restrictions in new cars". Electrek. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
- Teslarati (2015-10-16). "How Does Tesla 'Autopark' Parallel Parking Work?". TESLARATI. Retrieved 2020-01-06.
- Tesla Autopark Demo, retrieved 2020-01-06
- Tesla Model S Autopilot (Autopark) Demonstration, retrieved 2020-01-06
- "Tesla v7.0 software update boosts self-driving capabilities; Autopilot arrives". Green Car Congress. Retrieved 2020-07-03.
- Lambert, Fred (2016-08-29). "Tesla Autopilot with new v8.0 software update is able to handle highway interchanges". Electrek. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
- "Introducing Navigate on Autopilot". www.tesla.com. Retrieved 4 November 2018.
- Lambert, Fred (2018-09-26). "Tesla Version 9.0: all new features based on your Model 3, Model S, or Model X generation". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-07-03.
- Lambert, Fred (2019-02-10). "Tesla releases new software update with blind spot warning and auto-folding mirrors". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-07-03.
- Lambert, Fred (2019-05-03). "Tesla releases new active safety features powered by Autopilot". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-07-03.
- Musk, Elon (2019-04-06). "Tesla Enhanced Summon coming out in US next week for anyone with Enhanced Autopilot or Full Self-Driving option". @elonmusk. Retrieved 2019-04-06.
- Lavrinc, Damon (2014-10-09). "Tesla Model S Auto Pilot Does Lane Changes For You". Jalopnik. Retrieved 2017-08-23.
- "All Tesla Cars Being Produced Now Have Full Self-Driving Hardware". www.tesla.com. 2016-10-19. Retrieved 2020-09-25.
- Ferris, Robert (2016-10-20). "All Tesla vehicles being produced now have full self-driving hardware". CNBC. Retrieved 2020-09-25.
- Musk, Elon (2019-03-29). "Anyone who purchased full self-driving will get FSD computer upgrade for free. This is the only change between Autopilot HW2.5 & HW3. Going forward "HW3" will just be called FSD Computer, which is accurate. No change to vehicle sensors or wire harness needed". @elonmusk. Retrieved 2020-01-08.
- Musk, Elon (2019-03-29). "Retrofits will start when our software is able to take meaningful advantage of the Tesla FSD computer, which is an order of magnitude more capable. For now, it's slightly disadvantageous to have Tesla FSD computer, as our software is more refined for HW2". @elonmusk. Retrieved 2019-04-04.
- Lambert, Fred (2019-12-09). "Tesla adds stop sign and traffic light 3D renders in move to city driving visualization". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
- Lambert, Fred (2020-04-24). "Tesla releases new, highly anticipated Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control feature". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
- Alvarez, Simon (2018-10-16). "Tesla owners who ordered Full Self-Driving will get free HW3 upgrade, says Elon Musk". TESLARATI.com. Retrieved 2019-02-04.
- Weintraub, Seth (2019-02-28). "Tesla says 'Automatic driving on city streets' including responding to traffic lights/stop signs coming this year". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-09-24.
- "Autopilot". www.tesla.com. Retrieved 2020-01-07.
All new Tesla cars have the hardware needed in the future for full self-driving in almost all circumstances.
- "Design Your Model 3 | Tesla". www.tesla.com. Archived from the original on 2019-03-15. Retrieved 2020-01-07.
The currently enabled features require active driver supervision and do not make the vehicle autonomous.
- Model X Owner's Manual
- "Autopilot and Full Self-Driving Capability". www.tesla.com. 2019-02-13. Retrieved 2020-04-23.
- Hall, Gina (2015-12-16). "Tesla to limit self-driving functions". Silicon Valley Business Journal. Retrieved 2015-12-16.
- "Tesla wants to make self-driving cars a reality by collecting more video data from drivers". The Verge. 2015-12-16. Retrieved 2017-05-08.
- Lambert, Fred (2016-02-18). "Tesla pushes a new update with improved 'Autopark' and 'Summon' feature [v7.1 2.12.22 release notes]". Electrek. Retrieved 2017-02-23.
- "Summon Your Tesla from Your Phone". www.tesla.com. 2016-01-10. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
- D'Orazio, Dante (2016-01-09). "You can now summon your Tesla from the curb". The Verge. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
- "Introducing Navigate on Autopilot". www.tesla.com. 2018-10-26. Retrieved 2019-05-15.
- Hawkins, Andrew J. (2018-11-06). "Tesla's Navigate on Autopilot is like Waze on steroids". The Verge. Retrieved 2019-05-15.
- Plungis, Jeff. "Tesla's Smart Summon Performance Doesn't Match Marketing Hype". Consumer Reports. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
- Hawkins, Andrew J. (2019-09-30). "Tesla's Smart Summon feature is already causing chaos in parking lots across America". The Verge. Retrieved 2020-01-05.
- Going ALL Electric (2019-03-31), Tesla Enhanced Summon | Passes another vehicle, retrieved 2019-04-06
- Lambert, Fred (2020-04-24). "Tesla releases new, highly anticipated Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control feature". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-07-04.
- Golson, Jordan (2016-10-19). "All new Tesla cars now have hardware for 'full self-driving capabilities'". The Verge. Retrieved 2020-01-07.
- Alvarez, Simon (2019-11-18). "Tesla owner upgrades Autopilot 2.5 to 3.0 Hardware: Cost, results, and more". TESLARATI. Retrieved 2020-03-02.
- Musk, Elon (2018-12-09). "Full self-driving option is required with the Tesla designed hardware 3 computer. This is a simple plug in replacement for the NVidia computer, but has over 10X the image processing ability". @elonmusk. Retrieved 2020-01-21.
- Lambert, Fred (2020-01-13). "Elon Musk: Tesla's Full Self-Driving 'feature-complete' is coming 'soon'". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-03-02.
- Tesla. "Tesla HW3: Everything You Need To Know". InsideEVs. Retrieved 2020-06-25.
- Steve (2020-04-22). "LiDAR vs. Cameras for Self Driving Cars - What's Best?". AutoPilot Review. Retrieved 2020-10-07.
- "Researchers back Tesla's non-LiDAR approach to self-driving cars". The Robot Report. 2019-04-25. Retrieved 2020-06-25.
- "Elon Musk calls lidar 'stupid,' but most self-driving cars use it. Who's right?". The Mercury News. 2019-06-17. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
- LeBeau, Phil (2019-05-23). "Autonomous vehicle pioneer doubles down on technology Tesla CEO Elon Musk calls 'freaking stupid'". CNBC. Retrieved 2020-06-25.
- Lee, Timothy B. (2019-08-06). "Elon Musk: "Anyone relying on lidar is doomed." Experts: Maybe not". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2020-07-07.
- "Tesla Achieved The Accuracy Of Lidar With Its Advanced Computer Vision Tech". CleanTechnica. 2020-08-04. Retrieved 2020-10-16.
- Lambert, Fred (19 October 2016). "Tesla announces all production cars now have fully self-driving hardware". electrek. Retrieved 3 October 2018.
- Golson, Jordan (October 19, 2016). "All new Tesla cars now have hardware for 'full self-driving capabilities'". The Verge.
- "The Future of Tesla Autopilot - What Happens After Mobileye?". Wccftech. 2016-07-29. Retrieved 2016-12-31.
- "Tesla Self-Driving Car Built on NVIDIA DRIVE PX 2 | NVIDIA Blog". The Official NVIDIA Blog. 2016-10-20. Retrieved 2016-12-31.
- Isidore, Chris (2016-07-18). "Elon Musk says Autopilot upgrade could be coming". US: CNN. Retrieved 2016-07-19.
- Musk, Elon (2016-07-17). "Twitter". Retrieved 2016-07-19.
- Lambert, Fred (2017-01-02). "Lucid Motors' autonomous tech in its all-electric sedan will be powered by Tesla's former partner Mobileye". Electrek. Retrieved 2017-01-02.
- Lambert, Fred (2017-01-23). "'Tesla will not stop innovating' and introduce 'major updates every 12 to 18 months', says Elon Musk". Electrek. Retrieved 2017-01-23.
require "stripping down the entire car and replacing 300+ parts"
- Shapiro, Danny (2016-10-20). "Tesla Self-Driving Car Built on NVIDIA DRIVE PX 2 - NVIDIA Blog". The Official Nvidia Blog. Retrieved 2016-10-21.
- Lambert, Fred (2016-10-10). "Tesla is about to increase its lead in semi-autonomous driving w/ 'Tesla Vision': computer vision based on NVIDIA's parallel computing". Electrek. Retrieved 2016-10-10.
- Guess, Megan (2016-10-20). "Teslas will now be sold with enhanced hardware suite for full autonomy". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
- "Autopilot: Full Self-Driving Hardware on All Cars". Tesla Motors. Retrieved 2016-10-21.
- Lambert, Fred (2016-10-20). "A look at Tesla's new Autopilot hardware suite: 8 cameras, 1 radar, ultrasonics & new supercomputer". Electrek. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
Musk did say that the new vehicles will eventually be able to upgrade the new onboard Autopilot computer since the access has been made relatively easy
- "Video shows Tesla's new radar detect accident – and avoid it". The Mercury News. 2016-12-28. Retrieved 2020-06-23.
- Gitlin, Jonathan M. (2016-09-11). "Tesla is all about autopilot and radar in firmware 8". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2016-11-21.
- Wang, Brian (2018-08-01). "Tesla claims to have 'world's most advanced computer for autonomous driving' with Autopilot 3.0 update coming next year". Electrek. Retrieved 2018-08-09.
- Lambert, Fred (February 28, 2017). "Tesla Autopilot is currently using only 1 out of 8 cameras of the new hardware suite, still very much in 'beta'". electrek. Retrieved 3 October 2018.
- Lambert, Fred (March 30, 2017). "Tesla's Autopilot 2.0 is now using 2 out of 8 cameras with the new update". electrek. Retrieved 3 October 2018.
- SeekingAlpha, Brian (2018-10-25). "Tesla Q3 2018 Conference Call Transcript". SeekingAlpha. Retrieved 2018-11-28.
- Lambert, Fred (2019-01-04). "Tesla leaks info about new self-driving computer in latest software update". Electrek. Retrieved 2019-01-04.
- Lambert, Fred (2018-12-27). "Tesla to start testing new Autopilot Hardware 3 in employee vehicles". Electrek. Retrieved 2019-01-04.
- Hollister, Sean (2019-04-22). "Tesla's new self-driving chip is here, and this is your best look yet". The Verge. Retrieved 2020-08-24.
- Wang, Brian (2018-08-08). "Tesla's new Autopilot hardware upgrade will be free for owners with the $3,000 to $5,000 'Full Self-Driving' package". Electrek. Retrieved 2018-08-09.
- "Tesla Invites More Employees To Beta Test Hardware 3 Autonomous Driving Upgrade". CleanTechnica. 2018-12-31. Retrieved 2019-01-04.
- Cutress, Dr Ian. "Hot Chips 31 Live Blogs: Tesla Solution for Full Self Driving". www.anandtech.com. Retrieved 2019-08-21.
- "When Will Elon Musk Announce Autopilot 2.0 and the Model 3 HUD?".
- McMahon, Jeff. "Software Is The Last Obstacle To Fully Autonomous Vehicles, Elon Musk Says".
- Musk, Elon (2015-07-31). "The car will learn over time, but there is a min caliber of starting quality". Twitter. Archived from the original on 2015-11-10. Retrieved 2015-08-06.
- Olsen, Patrick. "Cadillac Tops Tesla in Consumer Reports' First Ranking of Automated Driving Systems". Consumer Reports. Retrieved 2020-06-23.
- Barry, Keith. "More Cars Getting GM's Super Cruise Automated Driving Setup". Consumer Reports. Retrieved 2020-06-25.
- Silver, David. "Tesla Model 3 Autopilot Outperforms Competitors in Lane-Keeping Test". Forbes. Retrieved 2020-06-25.
- "Tesla's Navigate on Autopilot wins Germany's Connected Car Innovation Award". September 18, 2019. Retrieved November 13, 2019.
- "Aftermarket Self-Driving Tech vs. Tesla Autopilot, Cadillac Super Cruise". www.caranddriver.com. Retrieved 2020-07-25.
- "Cadillac Super Cruise versus Tesla Autopilot". www.digitaltrends.com. Retrieved 2020-07-04.
- "Assisted Driving Gradings | Euro NCAP". www.euroncap.com. Retrieved 2020-10-06.
- Ferlita, Kyle (2020-11-01). "Consumer Reports says Tesla's Autopilot is a distant second to GM's Super Cruise". DriveTribe. Retrieved 2020-11-02.
- Shepardson, David (February 25, 2020). "Tesla and U.S. Regulators Strongly Criticized Over Role of Autopilot in Crash". US News.
- Muller, Joann. "NTSB says lax oversight of Tesla Autopilot is an accident waiting to happen". Axios. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
- "NTSB Calls Out Tesla, Apple And NHTSA Over Fatal Autopilot Crashes And Sloppy Regulating". Jalopnik. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
- Eisenstein, Paul A. (2019-07-26). "Safety groups want FTC, state probes of Tesla's Autopilot system–and its marketing efforts". CNBC. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
- "Center for Auto Safety and Consumer Watchdog Renew Their Call for the FTC and State Attorneys General to Investigate Tesla for Deceptive Practices After Another Autopilot-Related Death". Center for Autosafety. 2019-07-25. Retrieved 2020-04-30.
- "Tesla Autopilot slammed as "especially misleading" by UK safety experts". Auto Express. Retrieved 2020-07-19.
- "New studies highlight driver confusion about automated systems". IIHS-HLDI crash testing and highway safety. Retrieved 2020-10-03.
- Dixon, Liza (2020-05-01). "Autonowashing: The Greenwashing of Vehicle Automation". Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 5: 100113. doi:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100113. ISSN 2590-1982.
- Video Appears To Show Man Asleep Behind Wheel Of Self-Driving Car On LA Freeway | NBC Nightly News, retrieved 2020-05-02
- "A Sleeping Tesla Driver Highlights Autopilot's Biggest Flaw". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
- O'Kane, Sean (2018-05-14). "Tesla rejected more advanced driver monitoring features on its cars". The Verge. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
- "Why Tesla's Autopilot Can't See a Stopped Firetruck". Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 2020-07-15.
- Steve (2020-01-02). "Why Do Teslas Crash into Firetrucks and Other Emergency Vehicles?". AutoPilot Review. Retrieved 2020-10-07.
- "Tesla on 'Autopilot' hits police vehicle which hits ambulance, driver possibly drunk: police". The Mercury News. 2020-07-14. Retrieved 2020-07-15.
- Marteka, Peter. "Tesla on Autopilot collided Saturday morning with a state police cruiser". courant.com. Retrieved 2020-07-15.
- "Tesla that crashed into police car was in 'autopilot' mode, California official says". the Guardian. 2018-05-29. Retrieved 2020-07-15.
- "Thousands of Tesla Owners Share Their Close Calls With Autopilot". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2020-01-04. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
- at 07:04, Thomas Claburn in San Francisco 14 Nov 2018. "Oi, Elon: You Musk sort out your Autopilot! Tesla loyalists tell of code crashes, near-misses". www.theregister.co.uk. Retrieved 2020-05-02.
- Hutchinson, Lee (2016-05-21). "Cruising with Tesla's Autopilot in Houston traffic". Retrieved 2016-05-21.
- Gitlin, Jonathan (2016-05-14). "Another driver says Tesla's autopilot failed to brake; Tesla says otherwise". Ars Technica. US. Retrieved 2016-05-22.
- Hutchinson, Lee (2016-06-03). "Four hundred miles with Tesla's autopilot forced me to trust the machine". Ars Technica. US. Retrieved 2016-05-22.
- Aaron M. Kessler (2015-03-19). "Elon Musk Says Self-Driving Tesla Cars Will Be in the U.S. by Summer". The New York Times. Retrieved 2015-03-20.
- "Lawsuit labels Tesla Autopilot as 'dangerously defective'". Autoweek. Retrieved 2018-06-08.
- Bellon, Tina. "Tesla agrees to settle class action over Autopilot billed as 'safer'". Reuters. Retrieved 2018-06-08.
- Ewing, Jack (2020-07-14). "German Court Says Tesla Self-Driving Claims Are Misleading". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-07-15.
- Loveday, Steven (2016-04-29). "Elon Musk "The Probability Of Having An Accident Is 50% Lower If You Have Autopilot On"". Inside EVs. Retrieved 2016-04-29.
- "Fatal Tesla Autopilot accident investigation ends with no recall ordered". The Verge. 2017-01-19. Retrieved 2017-01-19.
- "PE 16-007. MY2014-2016 Tesla Model S and Model X" (PDF). NHTSA. 2017-01-19. Retrieved 2017-06-07.
- Mitchell, Russ (February 15, 2019). "An agency hid Tesla crash data for nearly two years". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
- NHTSA's Implausible Safety Claim for Tesla's Autosteer Driver Assistance System (Report). Quality Control Systems Corporation. February 2019. Retrieved 17 May 2019.
- Lambert, Fred (2020-04-22). "Tesla drops a bunch of new Autopilot data, 3 billion miles and more". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-04-23.
- Lambert, Fred (2020-04-21). "Tesla releases impressive videos of cars avoiding running over pedestrians". Electrek. Retrieved 2020-04-23.
- "Tesla Vehicle Safety Report". www.tesla.com. 2020-08-01. Retrieved 2020-08-16.
- "Tesla Fatalities Dataset". datasetsearch.research.google.com. Retrieved 2020-10-13.
- "Dashcam shows fatal Tesla Model S crash in China". CNet. 15 September 2016. Retrieved 18 October 2016.
- Boudette, Neal E. (14 September 2016). "Autopilot Cited in Death of Chinese Tesla Driver". The New York Times. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- Lambert, Fred (14 September 2016). "Another fatal Tesla crash reportedly on Autopilot emerges, Model S hits a streetsweeper truck – caught on dashcam". Electrek.
- "Tesla sued in China over fatal crash". Financial Times. (subscription required)
- Felton, Ryan (27 February 2018). "Two Years On, A Father Is Still Fighting Tesla Over Autopilot And His Son's Fatal Crash". Jalopnik. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- "《新闻1+1》 20180228 "自动驾驶"，如何驾驶？". China Central TV. 28 February 2018. Retrieved 24 October 2019.
- "Tesla confirms 'Autopilot' engaged in fatal crash in China". www.ecns.cn. Retrieved 2020-10-07.
- Yadron, Danny; Tynan, Dan (2016-07-01). "Tesla driver dies in first fatal crash while using autopilot mode". The Guardian. San Francisco. Retrieved 2016-07-01.
- Vlasic, Bill; Boudette, Neal E. (2016-06-30). "Self-Driving Tesla Involved in Fatal Crash". The New York Times. Retrieved 2016-07-01.
- Morris, David Paul (2016-07-01). "Highway patrol found DVD player in wreckage of fatal Tesla accident". CNBC. Associated Press. Retrieved 2016-07-01.
- Crash Research & Analysis, Inc. (January 2018). Special Crash Investigations: On-Site Automated Driver Assistance System Crash Investigation of the 2015 Tesla Model S 70D (Report No. DOT HS 812 481) (Report). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- Office of Defects Investigations, NHTSA (2016-06-28). "ODI Resume - Investigation: PE 16-007" (PDF). U.S.: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Retrieved 2016-07-02.
- Shepardson, David (2016-07-12). "NHTSA seeks answers on fatal Tesla Autopilot crash". Automotive News. Retrieved 2016-07-13.
- "A Tragic Loss" (Press release). Tesla Motors. 2016-06-30. Retrieved 2016-07-01.
This is the first known fatality in just over 130 million miles where Autopilot was activated. Among all vehicles in the US, there is a fatality every 94 million miles. Worldwide, there is a fatality approximately every 60 million miles.
- Simonite, Tom (2016-07-06). "Tesla's Dubious Claims About Autopilot's Safety Record". MIT Technology Review. US. Retrieved 2016-07-07.
- Abuelsamid, Sam (2016-07-05). "Adding Some Statistical Perspective To Tesla Autopilot Safety Claims". Forbes. Retrieved 2016-11-14.
- Liston, Barbara; Woodall, Bernie (2016-07-02). "DVD player found in Tesla car in fatal May crash". Retrieved 2016-07-03 – via Reuters.
- Collision Between a Car Operating With Automated Vehicle Control Systems and a Tractor-Semitrailer Truck Near Williston, Florida | May 7, 2017 | Accident Report NTSB/HAR-17/02 PB2017-102600 (PDF) (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. September 12, 2017. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
- Shepardson, David. "U.S. safety agency says 'did not assess' Tesla Autopilot effectiveness". U.S. Retrieved 2018-05-03.
- Levin, Alan; Plungis, Jeff (2016-07-08). "NTSB to scrutinize driver automation with probe of Tesla crash". Automotive News. Retrieved 2016-07-11.
- "Collision Between a Car Operating With Automated Vehicle Control Systems and a Tractor-Semitrailer Truck Near Williston, Florida May 7, 2016". National Transportation Safety Board. 12 September 2017. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- "An Update on Last Week's Accident". Tesla. 30 March 2018. Archived from the original on 31 March 2018. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
- "Deadly crash involving Tesla on Hwy 101 in Mountain View". KRON4. 23 March 2018. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- Shepardson, David (30 March 2018). "Tesla says crashed vehicle had been on autopilot prior to accident". Reuters. Reuters. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- Lambert, Fred (3 April 2018). "Tesla Autopilot confuses markings toward barrier in recreation of fatal Model X crash at exact same location". electrek. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- Lee, Timothy B. (5 April 2018). "There's growing evidence Tesla's Autopilot handles lane dividers poorly". Ars Technica. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- Lee, Timothy B. (31 March 2018). "Tesla says Autopilot was active during fatal crash in Mountain View". Ars Technica. Conde Nast. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- Noyes, Dan (2018-03-29). "I-TEAM EXCLUSIVE: Victim who died in Tesla crash had complained about auto-pilot". ABC7 San Francisco. Retrieved 2018-03-31.
- Siddiqui, Faiz (1 April 2018). "NTSB 'unhappy' with Tesla release of investigative information in fatal crash". The Washington Post. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
- "Tesla rebuked by death crash investigators". BBC News. 2 April 2018. Retrieved 3 March 2018.
- Lambert, Fred (2 April 2018). "Elon Musk hits back at NTSB's critique of Tesla releasing data of fatal Autopilot accident". electrek. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
- Sumwalt, Robert (April 12, 2018). "Automobile Crash Investigation, Mountain View, California (March 23, 2018; NTSB # HWY18FH011)" (PDF). Letter to Elon Musk. Retrieved 8 June 2018.
- Preliminary Report Highway: HWY18FH011 (PDF) (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. June 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2018.
- Safety Recommendation Report, Addressing Systemic Problems Related to the Timely Repair of Traffic Safety Hardware in California (PDF) (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. August 12, 2019. Retrieved 11 September 2019.
- "Timely Repair of Traffic Safety Hardware Focus of Safety Recommendation Report" (Press release). National Transportation Safety Board. September 9, 2019. Retrieved 11 September 2019.
- "Tesla Crash Investigation Yields 9 NTSB Safety Recommendations" (Press release). National Transportation Safety Board. February 25, 2020. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
- Collision Between a Sport Utility Vehicle Operating With Partial Driving Automation and a Crash Attenuator, Mountain View, California, March 23, 2018 | HWY18FH011 (PDF) (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. February 25, 2020. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
- "Safety Recommendation H-17-041". National Transportation Safety Board. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
- "Safety Recommendation H-17-042". National Transportation Safety Board. Retrieved 26 February 2020.
- Eliot, Lance. "Tesla Lawsuit Over Autopilot-Engaged Pedestrian Death Could Disrupt Automated Driving Progress". Forbes. Retrieved 2020-10-15.
- "Tesla's Autopilot Blamed in Lawsuit for Fatal Accident in Japan". Bloomberg.com. 2020-04-29. Retrieved 2020-10-15.
- Sutton, Scott (March 1, 2019). "Tesla driver killed after crash involving semi in western Delray Beach". WPTV 5 West Palm Beach. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
- Preliminary Report: Highway HWY19FH008 (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. May 16, 2019. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
- Milian, Jorge (March 4, 2019). "Two federal agencies probing fatal Tesla crash near Delray". Palm Beach Post. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
- Chokey, Aric; Krisher, Tom (March 3, 2019). "Tesla crash: Officials likely to probe if Autopilot driving system played role in most recent fatality". South Florida Sun Sentinel. The Associated Press. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
- Hawkins, Andrew J. (May 16, 2019). "Tesla's Autopilot was engaged when Model 3 crashed into truck, report states". The Verge. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
- "NTSB sending investigators to fatal Tesla-semitrailer crash". NBC News. Associated Press. March 1, 2019. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
- "Tesla in Autopilot mode crashes into fire truck". CNN. 24 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
- Baron, Ethan (22 January 2018). "Tesla 'on Autopilot' slams into parked fire truck on California freeway". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- Highway Accident Brief: Rear-End Collision Between a Car Operating with Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and a Stationary Fire Truck (Report). National Transportation Safety Board. August 22, 2019. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
- "Tesla Model S firetruck crash in California: What we know so far". TESLARATI. 25 January 2018. Retrieved 31 January 2018.
- Stewart, Jack (25 January 2018). "Why Tesla's Autopilot can't see a stopped firetruck". Wired. Retrieved 5 April 2018.
- Krisher, Tom; Durbin, Dee-Ann (27 January 2018). "2 federal agencies send teams to probe Tesla freeway crash". Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- Mitchell, Russ (25 January 2018). "Tesla crash highlights a problem: When cars are partly self-driving, humans don't feel responsible". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 1 April 2018.
- "Final Report - Crash involving Tesla Model S – 10400 South Bangerter Highway" (PDF) (Press release). South Jordan Police Department. 16 May 2018. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
- "Utah driver who slammed her Tesla into a firetruck sues the carmaker over Autopilot feature". September 6, 2018. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
- della Cava, Marco (14 May 2018). "Tesla Model S was on Autopilot, Utah driver tells police". USA Today. Retrieved 15 May 2018.
- Winkler, Sgt Samuel (14 May 2018). "Crash involving Tesla Model S – 10400 South Bangerter Highway, South Jordan, Utah" (PDF) (Press release). South Jordan City Police Department. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
- "Tesla driver in Utah crash says Autopilot was on and she was looking at her phone". Los Angeles Times. Associated Press. 14 May 2018. Retrieved 15 May 2018.
- Holley, Peter (16 May 2018). "Federal investigators are looking into Tesla's latest autopilot crash in Utah". The Washington Post. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
- della Cava, Marco (16 May 2018). "Tesla driver in Utah crash kept taking her hands off wheel as car sped in Autopilot mode". USA Today. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
- Hattem, Julian (26 May 2018). "Tesla in Autopilot mode sped up before crashing". APNewsBreak. Associated Press. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
- Raymond, Art (5 September 2018). "Driver in South Jordan auto-pilot crash sues Tesla". Deseret News. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
- "Tesla electric car catches fire after hitting tow truck in Moscow". Thomson Reuters. Reuters. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
- Lambert, Fred (August 11, 2019). "Tesla Model 3 explodes after crash with truck, reportedly on Autopilot". Electrek.
- Siddiqi, Faiz (August 12, 2019). "Tesla on Autopilot bursts into flames after slamming into tow truck in Moscow, reports say". The Washington Post. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
- Alvarez, Simon (August 12, 2019). "Tesla Model 3 fire in Moscow: What we know so far". Teslarati.
- Orf, Darren (August 13, 2019). "Tesla Model 3 Blows Up ... Twice ... on Busy HIghway". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 4 September 2019.
- Tesla smashes into overturned truck while on Autopilot, report says, Fox News, 1 June 2020
- "Testing (Semi) Autonomous Cars With Tesla, Cadillac, Hyundai, and Mercedes". Motor Trend. 2016-07-05.