User talk:Jeremy112233

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jeremy112233, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ifnord (talk) 20:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Well, thanks for the new page! ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 23:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.2.110 (talk) 18:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, that put a smile on my face! Jeremy112233 (talk) 18:29, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks

You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for creating the new article Roger Brooks and for your work to improve the encyclopedia for the public. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Jeremy112233 (talk) 16:33, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MMA

Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you havn't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page. Kevlar (talk) 03:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For writing EC Harris - rare to find a business article so wonderfully referenced! Ironholds (talk) 10:20, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for making my day! Jeremy112233 (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The happiness of this season to you

	Winter solstice 2012–2013
	- GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:16, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New Editorial Level

This editor is a
**Yeoman Editor**
and is entitled to display this **Service Badge**.

Talkback

Hello, Jeremy112233. You have new messages at TheOriginalSoni's talk page.
Message added 00:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 00:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jeremy112233. You have new messages at TheOriginalSoni's talk page.
Message added 00:28, 29 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

TheOriginalSoni (talk) 00:28, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Editorial Level

"Experienced Editor, awarded for being a registered editor for at least 1.5 years and making at least 6,000 edits" — This editor is an
**Experienced Editor**
and is entitled to display this
**Service Badge**.

Biocentric universe

Hi, you edited the main page of Biocentric universe to close the AfD as keep. Could you also post the usual message in the usual place on the talk page too? Thanks. Aarghdvaark (talk) 01:51, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback Request

Hi; per your request for permissions I've added the rollback flag to your account. If you need any help with the tool feel free to ask. Pedro : Chat 19:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I definitely will :) Jeremy112233 (talk) 19:49, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:18, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I will be very cautious in my use of the tool.Jeremy112233 (talk) 19:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

		The Disambiguator's Barnstar
		The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. You came second in the dab challenge of September 2013, where you fixed a total of 3471* links. Rcsprinter (talk to me) @ 21:46, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]*

Thank you! I actually came in first, but the judge stopped counting the votes before midnight :) I'm just happy to help though! Jeremy112233 (talk) 21:47, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File mover permission

I have granted file mover rights to your account following either a request for those rights or a clear need for the ability to move files. For information on the file mover rights and under what circumstances it is okay to move files, see Wikipedia:File mover. If you do not want file mover rights anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. —Darkwind (talk) 01:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! This will allow me to contribute much more to the project. Jeremy112233 (talk) 13:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for creating Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act! Your work is greatly appreciated. ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 19:46, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Christopher Helt

On 5 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christopher Helt, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Christopher Helt represented retired Army colonel Richard J. Thomas in a 1997 lawsuit against his wife, claiming that her smoking was a violation of the Clean Air Act? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Christopher Helt. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Lindhout

Hi Jeremy112233. There seems to be some more disruptive ip editing here. I'm not sure if it's the same user, but two separate editors were blocked on the page some time ago [1]. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 18:45, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for letting me know. It is likely the same person as it's a bit of a coincidence that multiple IPs have been trying to add the same type of content. Thanks for intervening :) I do feel the additions are slanted, so there are BLP issues at hand in my eyes when it comes to those recent page edits. Jeremy112233 (talk) 19:04, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and no prob. Cheers, Middayexpress (talk) 19:13, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Karate Kid

Hello! I noticed that you changed The Karate Kid to redirect to The Karate Kid (1984 film) last September. This essentially terms the film as the primary topic for this term. Since this seems to be the case, I am requesting a move. You can see the discussion at Talk:The Karate Kid (1984 film)#Requested move. Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 14:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Jeremy112233. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 17:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 17:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jewish Rock Radio

Hello! Your submission of Jewish Rock Radio at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 11:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jewish Rock Radio

On 25 February 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jewish Rock Radio, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that musician Rick Recht was inspired to create Jewish Rock Radio after seeing how Christian rock radio stations operated? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jewish Rock Radio. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it may be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 11:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Criss Angel

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Criss Angel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 10:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Hunter

Hi Jeremy, I was trying to update my wikipedia page, which is very out of date. It has been cut now, how can I get my page to be in date? best tom hunter artist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomhunterart (talk • contribs) 17:18, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there User:Tomhunterart. Generally you should avoid editing your own page on Wikipedia as the rules can be very complex in terms of producing content that is neutral, properly sourced, and in line with style protocols. I would suggest that you do the following: Prepare a list of items that you believe should be added to the page and ensure each item is supported by a newspaper or magazine article (provide these as well), and then add a section on the talk page of your article asking for another editor to add that material to the page for you. Hopefully, another editor will review your request and see whether or not you have the right kinds of sources and if the material is notable enough to be added. Given how your recent edits were received, I would avoid editing your page further at the very minimum, as you are likely to be blocked from editing further if you persist in adding information that is not in accordance with Wikipedia rules. Jeremy112233 (talk) 17:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jeremy112233. You have new messages at JMHamo's talk page.
Message added 21:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

JMHamo (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed changes to the Ipanema Technologies page

Hi Jeremy,

Thanks so much for your feedback ages ago to the [Technologies] page. I'm just posting here because we've taken the insight that both you and Neil916 offered, and have made updates along what I hope are the correct lines.

It would be lovely to have your feedback. Hopefully we got it right this time.

Thank you again!

DianneDianneDianne (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your DYK nomination of Criss Angel

Hi, the maximum allowed length of a DYK hook is 200 characters, but the original one you supplied is 230. It will have to be edited, split into two hooks, replaced with a shorter one, or simply abandoned in favor of the existing ALT, which is already an acceptable length. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 22:32, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you User:Mandarax, I have now cut down the length--I didn't know that spaces were counted as characters. Jeremy112233 (talk) 22:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doug Clark (investor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SkyWest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Asare Akuffo

Hi Jeremy112233 thank for reviewing my DYK on Asare Akuffo, I have addressed your concerns please see if the DYK is ready for the main page now. Template:Did you know nominations/Asare Akuffo Thanks. God bless.#CrossTemple Jay 11:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Criss Angel

The article Criss Angel you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Criss Angel for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Casliber -- Casliber (talk) 18:45, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you know about ORTS

Can you talk to Strikertype (talk · contribs)?

I don't understand ORTS - it's like the black arts to me. Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly :) Jeremy112233 (talk) 14:17, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Criss Angel

On 28 March 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Criss Angel, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Criss Angel has been on primetime television more than any other magician, including his series Criss Angel Mindfreak – the first weekly magic show to air in over 40 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Criss Angel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Frankie

That edit of mine was a glitch, sorry. μηδείς (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I figured as such! Jeremy112233 (talk) 20:20, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information about Amanda Lindhout.

So she never gave birth to a baby while in captivity. Thank goodness. I did find it odd that when she was released, a baby wasn't with her. --96.59.223.143 (talk) 21:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's always the problem with journalists reporting on rumors; once they're disproven retractions rarely follow :) Jeremy112233 (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mass Transit Project=

I interpret this as a program, or group of programs within a company; A7 does therefore not apply--see WP:CSD. Whether it is notable or not may well be another matter--try AfD DGG ( talk ) 00:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014 disambig contest: let's do it again!

Greetings fellow disambiguator! Remember back in February when we made history by clearing the board for the first time ever, for the monthly disambiguation contest? Let's do it again in May! I personally will be aiming to lead the board next month, but for anyone who thinks they can put in a better effort, I will give a $10 Amazon gift card to any editor who scores more disambiguation points in May. Also, I will be setting up a one-day contest later in the month, and will try to set up more prizes and other ways to make this a fun and productive month. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely considering this if I have time! Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 22:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for William Stadiem

On 15 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article William Stadiem, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that William Stadiem's book on Frank Sinatra was based on thousands of pages of notes taken about Sinatra's everyday life by his valet George Jacobs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Stadiem. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Heramba

Can you please take a look again at the hook. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ed McGowin

On 30 June 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ed McGowin, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that American artist Ed McGowin changed his name and identity twelve times over an eighteen-month period? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ed McGowin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 16:20, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TSO content

Hi there,

You had written "Unfortunately the sources you have been using to add negative content about the biographies of living people to Wikipedia are not allowed. If you would like your content to remain up on the site, I suggest that you find more reliable, third-party sources, or else the content will continue not to comply with Wikipedia's strict referencing rules."

That is not MY content, as you infer. I merely restored it because it was explaining what happened to two of the long-time performers, and it was coming from a direct interview from those performers. Those interviews have been quoted and referenced in many online articles as well. Meant no harm, and also restored the information about their "Dream Child 2010" release with an added reference. 174.57.209.235 (talk) 06:52, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. The interviews are not RS, however, and cannot be used on Wikipedia. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 13:59, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Informal note

Hey, I notice that you have HighBeam access and you seem to have a few topicons. That being said, if you are interested, I've created {{Wikipedia:HighBeam/Topicon}}. No reply to this message is necessary (and I won't see it unless you ping me), just wanted to let you know it was available. Happy editing! — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} 23:57, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help with accusation of browser hijacking?

Hi there. We noticed your very balanced, even-handed and nuanced participation in a discussion regarding accusations of browser hijacking on the Conduit talk page and were wondering if you might be willing to have a look at this edit on the page Surf Canyon. Unlike Conduit, we have never participated in any browser hijacking activities. Our application is also very easy to remove using standard methods, with instructions provided on our FAQ. The edit, by a single-issue IP editor, may be nothing but linkspam for the referenced blog, which, by the way, refers to both the Bing and Yahoo! toolbars as "viruses."

We would prefer not to undo this ourselves because of the potential for the appearance of a conflict of interest; given your understanding of these issues, we're hoping you might be willing to just back that edit out. You likely would find that none of the verifiable sources mentioning Surf Canyon as a product or a company say anything about hijacking, and malwaretips.com fails to meet the documentation criteria listed at WP:RSE. Thanks very much if you have a moment to look into this, or if you can recommend someone else. —SurfCanyonInc (talk) 23:12, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SurfCanyonInc. I've removed the non-RS links from the page, one was also a previous one supporting other content. The one piece of advice I would give is to close this account and open a different one. While your admittance of COI is very laudable (!), unfortunately Wikipedia does not allow usernames that indicate that the user represents a group or institution, instead of being an individual. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 19:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the edits and for the tip. FWIW, "our" account is only used by one individual. I haven't seen that particular bit of policy, and I read quite a bit before contacting you; could you point me to it, or just let me/us know if it would be sufficient to make it clear on the User page that it's "an employee" rather than a group account? Password has not been shared. Either way, than you for your kind assistance. —SurfCanyonInc (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Any username will work, so long as it cannot be misconstrued as a group. Not to worry, many people make this mistake. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 20:16, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Upload directly to Commons

Hi Jeremy. Would you mind uploading your images directly to Commons, where applicable? it would reduce administrator workload, as they're all being transferred over there anyway, and the copy here has to be deleted. Thanks, -- Diannaa (talk) 01:34, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'll upload them there where applicable. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 17:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- Diannaa (talk) 18:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

UAA

In reference to the usernames you recently reported to UAA, I just wanted to let you know that those types of usernames are permitted by the username policy: usernames are acceptable if they contain a company or group name but are clearly intended to denote an individual person, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA". Regards, -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:52, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Well then I'll withdraw the requests. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 16:54, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help with a new section for Verizon article?

Hello Jeremy112233, I am reaching out to you for some help as I noticed that you recently made a helpful edit on the Verizon Enterprise Solutions article. As you may have seen on that Talk page, I am an employee of Verizon, and I don't make any direct edits to Verizon related articles myself. However, from time to time I have offered drafts to update the Verizon article and other articles, including that for Verizon Enterprise Solutions. I am wondering if you could help me with a new draft that I am suggesting for the Verizon Communications article.

I have offered a new draft to add a section regarding the company's "Corporate responsibility," which currently is not covered in the article at all. You can find the draft in my userspace. On the Verizon Talk page, here, I have left a more detailed request. To date, I have not had any replies from the Wiki Project and editors I have reached out to, so I am hoping that you might be interested in looking at this draft. If you have the time, would you be able to look over the draft and move it into the article if it looks good? I am open to any suggestions or questions.

Thanks so much, VZBob (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flash Art

Hello there! Nice to meet you! Just giving you a heads-up (as you've been a frequent editor to this article) that I removed the internship controversy section given the refs used were wholly non-notable or didn't even exist. A more adequate treatise on the issue can be found on the magazine editor's article, although I've still to find adequate sources (something which may be entirely impossible given the little transcendence of the issue). Please let me know if you have any thoughts. Regards, FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Agnona

added links pointing to Balmain, Yves Saint Laurent, Cashmere, Valentino and Joyce

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

COLIN CALLENDER

Hi Jeremy. Reaching out to you regarding your reverted change to Colin Callender's page. You reverted a former change, saying that:"At ITV, Callender worked on several television epics, such as Brideshead Revisited and Jewel in the Crown." While he was at Granada when these programs were made, he didn't explicitly work on them so it would be unfair to say this. As a result I have deleted the comment. I hope that is ok with you.

Ddapr (talk) 13:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dancho Danchev

I have received a number of emails from Dancho Danchev requesting the re-instatement of his bio. You created the article in 2015 August and then in April this year you requested its deletion. Dancho claims to have contacted you about this. Do think that he has become notable enough for Wikipedia in the four months since the article was deleted? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:RHaworth Was just trying to avoid a conflict of interest when he sent a private message, feel free to reinstate it (I hate to stand in anyone's way in terms of opposition, so returning it would be fine). I think he is pretty notable as a blogger, was just iffy on whether or not there was enough non-negative balance--not a notability issue. One of only a few times I've ever heard from someone I wrote about; didn't know how to respond. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 01:50, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Motoparking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scooter. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TAFI

If you want to, take a look at the article about Marie Serneholt which is this weeks TAFI article. Regards.--BabbaQ (talk) 19:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Diesel logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Diesel logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Diesel Logo 2015.png

Thanks for uploading File:Diesel Logo 2015.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jack Mohr

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jack Mohr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 10:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Panopto Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Panopto Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your 2013 edit

Hi,

Just to let you know I removed your edit because I could not find support for it in the article. Ottawahitech (talk) 20:31, 24 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

Nomination of Ideas42 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ideas42 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideas42 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ireneshih (talk) 06:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RedViking for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RedViking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedViking until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ireneshih (talk) 06:35, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jack Mohr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Mohr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Mohr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Society for Clinical & Medical Hair Removal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Society for Clinical & Medical Hair Removal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Society for Clinical & Medical Hair Removal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New York Loan Company for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New York Loan Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New York Loan Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordan Tabach-Bank for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Tabach-Bank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Tabach-Bank until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:22, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of StartupValley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article StartupValley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StartupValley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Grossman (consultant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Grossman (consultant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Grossman (consultant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:25, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Advanced Skin Fitness for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Advanced Skin Fitness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Skin Fitness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:28, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NYLC Logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NYLC Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Society of Clinical & Medical Hair Removal logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Society of Clinical & Medical Hair Removal logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RedViking Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RedViking Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ASF logo RGB.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ASF logo RGB.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reward Gateway logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reward Gateway logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Shopgate company logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Shopgate company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Mossack Fonseca.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo Mossack Fonseca.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Charlie Walk photo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Charlie Walk photo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:06, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo For Zevia.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Logo For Zevia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charlie Walk photo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Charlie Walk photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 00:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aspinal of London logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aspinal of London logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ball and Chain (restaurant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ball and Chain (restaurant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball and Chain (restaurant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roger Brooks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roger Brooks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger Brooks (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Grossman (consultant), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Company. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MotoParking for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MotoParking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MotoParking until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AVI Systems for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AVI Systems is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AVI Systems until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex and Ani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alex and Ani, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wefi logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wefi logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ideas42 (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Promotional with unclear notability. The first step in a proper revision so the article can be fairly judged is to remove all the references that are the consulting firm's own publications,and all of the many that are trivial notices.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ideas42 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 03:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Jeremy112233, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 03:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AVI Systems (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AVI Systems (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jenks24 (talk) 09:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tipsy Elves logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tipsy Elves logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hoorsenbuhs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hoorsenbuhs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoorsenbuhs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:40, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alex and Ani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex and Ani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex and Ani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:52, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Trustmark Website logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trustmark Website logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Van Day Truex

Jeremy: Referring to the Wikipedia article on Van Day Truex. I am his cousin (1st, once removed) and knew him personally. Having unsuccessfully submitted an article on him to Wikipedia I entered a new copy on March 30, 2014 as seen in the revision history under his name. This was soon superseded by your entry, and I do not know if this was in regard to content or some violation of Wikipedia methodology. There were later revisions apparent in the "history" column. The article on Truex now in Wikipedia contains several errors. My article its based on my personal knowledge and on the biography by Adam Lewis, with whom I had personal contact. I would like to get it reinstated, but I find Wikipedia's publishing route so complex that I do not know if I can succeed. I am a retired college librarian. wpease@mail.sdsu.edu

William J. Pease (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)William J. Pease[reply]

You have already made the first positive step, which is to make public your connection to the subject. It appears that I reverted the edit due to two issues: 1) it was improperly sourced and 2) it was not neutrally worded. If the content comes from a biography, you might want to cite each sentence by page number. Then, so long as you aren't using flowery language, your content would likely become a welcome contribution to the page. Just make sure to respect the other contributors as well. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 14:56, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brigitte Gouin

The article Brigitte Gouin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article violates the WP biography notability guideline. There is an absence of any significant information regarding this person, and generally the amount of information contained in this article do not meet the requirements of a Wiki page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tseung Kwan O (talk) 11:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pharmacy2U logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pharmacy2U logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douglas Glynn Bolitho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Glynn Bolitho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Glynn Bolitho until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 16:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agnona logo.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agnona logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ideas42 (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would not resubmit as I'm still not seeing anything actually close to establishing a convincing independent notability along with substance.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ideas42 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 21:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for a period of indefinite for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremy112233. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 21:26, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam Goldberg (food writer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Goldberg (food writer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Goldberg (food writer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light21 07:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Light2021 (talk • contribs)

Orphaned non-free image File:Testees DVD Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Testees DVD Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:34, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TriumphOfTheWill DVD front big.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TriumphOfTheWill DVD front big.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:43, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jinx (clothing) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jinx (clothing) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jinx (clothing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 23:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeremy112233, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Shirt58 (talk) 10:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Axioma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Axioma, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jeremy112233. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Minute After Midnight album cover .jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Minute After Midnight album cover .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:04, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Retro Chic - A Guide to Fabulous Vintage and Designer Resale Shopping in North America and Online cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Retro Chic - A Guide to Fabulous Vintage and Designer Resale Shopping in North America and Online cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Other Planets album cover by Erik Scott.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Other Planets album cover by Erik Scott.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Reflections logo.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reflections logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ambrosia - About A Culture (James Cummins book - front cover).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ambrosia - About A Culture (James Cummins book - front cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Explorer's Code novel cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Explorer's Code novel cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Chaikin PT.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chaikin PT.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ideas42

Hello, Jeremy112233. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ideas42".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 07:58, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Burning Cold book cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Burning Cold book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Yes I'm a Ho album cover.jpg

The file File:Yes I'm a Ho album cover.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover art being used in a decorative manner in Wendy Jo Smith#Entertainment career. Non-free album cover art is generally condsidered acceptable to use when it serves as the primary means of identification in a stand-alone article about the album itself, but a much stronger justification is expected when it is used in other articles as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3. This particular cover art is not itself the subject of a sourced critical commentary within the article, so the context required by WP:NFCC#8 is lacking.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Suggestivism Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Suggestivism Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jackson Design and Remodeling logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jackson Design and Remodeling logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Flex Magazine cover featuring Rick Valente.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Flex Magazine cover featuring Rick Valente.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Urban Retail Properties

The article Urban Retail Properties has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of EntertainmentCareers.net

The article EntertainmentCareers.net has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure advertising created by a sockfarm and maintained since then by a few drive-by single-purpose accounts. Delete per WP:NOTPROMO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ThinkTank Learning

The article ThinkTank Learning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete as pure promotion with no purpose on Wikipedia; created by sock and expanded only by several SPAs Dcstup and KickItWithK and probably one of above logged out as 108.238.128.47.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:53, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The-dead-matter-movie-poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The-dead-matter-movie-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:First Suggestivism exhibition poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:First Suggestivism exhibition poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beverly Loan Company logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beverly Loan Company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:New logo for GSF.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:New logo for GSF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marriage Fitness DVD cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marriage Fitness DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TubeStart logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TubeStart logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 888casino

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 888casino, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 19:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Galia Lahav

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Galia Lahav, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 19:38, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jade Signature for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jade Signature is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jade Signature until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 888casino for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 888casino is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/888casino until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:53, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Presidential Task Force

The article Presidential Task Force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

inadequate didcdef

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 19:54, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shopgate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shopgate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shopgate until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:59, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bird Barrier America for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bird Barrier America is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bird Barrier America until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Galia Lahav logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Galia Lahav logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShowBiz Cinemas logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShowBiz Cinemas logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Online Therapy Institute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Online Therapy Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online Therapy Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:04, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ThinkTank Learning.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ThinkTank Learning.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Jeremy112233/My sandbox/HC

User:Jeremy112233/My sandbox/HC, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Jeremy112233/My sandbox/HC and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Jeremy112233/My sandbox/HC during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 23:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Janson Media Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Janson Media Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bible is.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bible is.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MobiCart logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MobiCart logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lamboo LOGO 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lamboo LOGO 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bird Barrier logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bird Barrier logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MiaDonna logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MiaDonna logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Miss You Can Do It film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miss You Can Do It film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Once Upon a Treehouse logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Once Upon a Treehouse logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Prospect Equities logo new.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prospect Equities logo new.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Online-Therapy-Institute.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Online-Therapy-Institute.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adrian Van de Mosselaer

The article Adrian Van de Mosselaer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A ton of WP:ROUTINE sources and mentions do not meet WP:GNG. Far below any criterion of WP:NHOCKEY. (Also possible COI).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yosemiter (talk) 01:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EntertainmentCareers.net for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EntertainmentCareers.net is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EntertainmentCareers.net until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:06, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brad Hall (producer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brad Hall (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad Hall (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrew Nisker

The article Andrew Nisker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

highly promotional article on producer of minor films, written by now banned undeclared paid editor and sockpuppet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guavus

The article Guavus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

highly promotional article on producer of minor software, written by now banned undeclared paid editor and sockpuppet.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of TechExcel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TechExcel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TechExcel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:27, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Verengo Solar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Verengo Solar, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 02:45, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MetaCommunications

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MetaCommunications, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 02:47, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andrew Nisker

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrew Nisker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 19:33, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of PowerSteering for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PowerSteering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerSteering until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:57, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Cummins (author)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Cummins (author), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:17, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Olympian Swim Club (Canadian swim team)

The article Olympian Swim Club (Canadian swim team) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An oranization with strictly local note, who apparently paid to have this article created. Fails WP:NOT on several counts. Media from outside the immediately local area merely mention an individual who once coached for this group (Montreal paper) or a swim event that happened to occur there (Edmonton paper) or in-passing mention of the club when discussing a winning swimmer (Regina).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:51, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert S. Dixon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert S. Dixon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert S. Dixon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lorne Akins Junior High

The article Lorne Akins Junior High has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Junior high schools don't inherit notability because somebody spoke there once, or some athletes came from the school.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Upper Playground

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Upper Playground, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 08:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Home Star

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Home Star, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 08:05, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pizza Cuz

The article Pizza Cuz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 08:05, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Rainmaker Institute

The article The Rainmaker Institute has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orchid Recovery Center for Women

The article Orchid Recovery Center for Women has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no notable center with relatively minor press coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juan Pablo Cappello

The article Juan Pablo Cappello has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

apparently paid promotional article for mid-level entrepreneur, makignthe most out of minor awards and press releases. Not actually notable, and the paid nature of the editing makes it appropriate for deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eric R. George

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Eric R. George, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 02:32, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Rainmaker Institute

The article The Rainmaker Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence for notability--minor firm, and the lawsuit is 1E

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Choi (professor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on David Choi (professor), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 17:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Envelopes Logo Squared.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Envelopes Logo Squared.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jason Saltzman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jason Saltzman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Saltzman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 17:03, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Independent Day School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Independent Day School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Independent Day School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:33, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maria Elena Ibañez for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Elena Ibañez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Elena Ibañez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:38, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rick Schwartz (domainer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rick Schwartz (domainer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Schwartz (domainer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 02:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hazem Farraj

The article Hazem Farraj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

promotional article by undeclared paid editor based on press releases

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:40, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Independent Day School logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Independent Day School logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Software companies of Turkey

A tag has been placed on Category:Software companies of Turkey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^{T go beyond} 18:17, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hazem Farraj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hazem Farraj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazem Farraj until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 09:06, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Choi (professor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Choi (professor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Choi (professor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dan Bilzerian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Bilzerian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Bilzerian until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jacqueline Newman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jacqueline Newman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 00:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boa Technology

The article Boa Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

promotional and non notable - -just listings and PR -- the articles oin the individual sports publications are fundamentally their advertising . Created by now banned paid editor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 00:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boa Technology logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boa Technology logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sergio Alonso Fernández de Córdova for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sergio Alonso Fernández de Córdova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergio Alonso Fernández de Córdova until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lori Allen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lori Allen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Training camp logo.png

The file File:Training camp logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 08:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Logo-EPMLive.png

The file File:Logo-EPMLive.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TechExcel logo.jpg

The file File:TechExcel logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:11, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Faith Comes By Hearing Logo.jpg

The file File:Faith Comes By Hearing Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 16:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:G.L. Homes.jpg

The file File:G.L. Homes.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 12:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Buckfire lawyer logo.png

The file File:Buckfire lawyer logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neil Seeman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neil Seeman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neil Seeman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 22:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark Whiteley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark Whiteley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Whiteley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 18:40, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kenneth Arredondo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kenneth Arredondo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Arredondo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 11:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:TheAudience logo.png

The file File:TheAudience logo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:4thElevator3.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:4thElevator3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Target page's file is on commons, so redirect doesn't work here (G8)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DannyS712 (talk) 07:23, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brian Riordan (judge)

The article Brian Riordan (judge) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has been around for several years and nothing presented in the article indicates he is any more notable than any other judge. No indication of scholarly work or notable cases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ThurstonMitchell (talk) 22:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brownie Brittle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brownie Brittle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brownie Brittle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Desertarun (talk) 21:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Portvision

The article Portvision has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mainly prodding because of apparent WP:UPE by prolific sockmaster, but notability seems borderline anyway.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:48, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yvan Roy (justice) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yvan Roy (justice) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yvan Roy (justice) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stephen Shooster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Shooster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Shooster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theredproject (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebel Eats

The article Rebel Eats has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable pilot, no sourcing

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:04, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rebel Eats for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rebel Eats is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebel Eats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:59, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Treasure Detectives

The article Treasure Detectives has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only one passing mention, very few sources found, possible COI

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Urban Tarzan

The article Urban Tarzan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability and sources 5+ years with none forthcoming

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:32, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Treasure Detectives for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Treasure Detectives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Treasure Detectives until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BodyShaping cast shot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BodyShaping cast shot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karma's A B*tch

The article Karma's A B*tch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

reason for proposed deletion Undisclosed paid article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Silvio Pestrin Farina

The article Silvio Pestrin Farina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, should redirect to FictionCity

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]