Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
ChrisO~enwiki (talk | contribs)
43,032 edits
Line 57: Line 57:
:With respect, if SirFozzie desired it protected for a longer duration, would he not have reprotected it himself? Unless there's something that requires immediate protection, I'd suggest you ask SirFozzie to clarify his intentions. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]] 23:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
:With respect, if SirFozzie desired it protected for a longer duration, would he not have reprotected it himself? Unless there's something that requires immediate protection, I'd suggest you ask SirFozzie to clarify his intentions. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]] 23:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
::SirFozzie protected it for a month in the belief (which everyone shared at the time) that the case would be over by then. Unfortunately the completion of the case was delayed beyond that timeframe. The article has been the target of extremely abusive anonymous editing for a long time, which has made it necessary to semi-protect it for almost all of its existence. Unfortunately this has expired along with the full protection. At the very least, it needs to be re-semi-protected to return it to the state immediately before SirFozzie's full protection, until SirFozzie can get around to reading his email. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] ([[User talk:ChrisO|talk]]) 23:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
::SirFozzie protected it for a month in the belief (which everyone shared at the time) that the case would be over by then. Unfortunately the completion of the case was delayed beyond that timeframe. The article has been the target of extremely abusive anonymous editing for a long time, which has made it necessary to semi-protect it for almost all of its existence. Unfortunately this has expired along with the full protection. At the very least, it needs to be re-semi-protected to return it to the state immediately before SirFozzie's full protection, until SirFozzie can get around to reading his email. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] ([[User talk:ChrisO|talk]]) 23:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

The page has now been protected, so this request is superseded. -- [[User:ChrisO|ChrisO]] ([[User talk:ChrisO|talk]]) 09:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


===={{la|James Toney}}====
===={{la|James Toney}}====

Revision as of 09:26, 29 August 2010


"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit



    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    semi protection till november Always a vandalism target. refer to protection history Dre (album) and The DeAndre Way (album). Red Flag on the Right Side 08:30, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection This page is a regular and repeated target of vandalism which is not getting any better without semi-prot. Tvoz/talk 06:01, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 06:23, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, This page has recently been a target by various vandals, using different IPs. Shenhemu (talk) 05:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Besides, it's currently PC-protected. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, same as last RfA - vandalism. Connormah 02:55, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Airplaneman ✈ 02:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    long term semi - long term vandalism target; just never ceases. Paralympiakos (talk) 02:17, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    one day semi - competing right now, being vandalised. Paralympiakos (talk) 02:16, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Airplaneman ✈ 02:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, OK, I'm actually requesting semi-protection for this article or that the "pending changes" feature is added to it. The reason is that the article is currently high profile due to the series ending this week (Tuesday for England and Wales, I think the following Monday for Scotland) after 27 years on TV. I know that when it was announced that the series was axed the page suffered a lot of unconstructive edits and I just know the same will happen again this week. Is it possible to request this for the article? . 5 albert square (talk) 02:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    COMMENT - I originally answered a question regarding requesting adding Pending Changes here. I thus directed the user here with the suggestion of semi-protection as I presume no pages are currently being added to Pending Changes, and that they were requested here in any case. If I am mistaken and PC is still being added to pages, please let me know. I do know it's under review ATM. CycloneGU (talk) 02:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    COMMENT - Sorry I should have pointed this out before. I'm aware that there is currently a protection template of some sort on the page, however the protection has now expired. Just the bot hasn't taken the template off yet, the protection expired on 25 August --5 albert square (talk) 02:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined – Pages are not protected preemptively. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite full protection vandalism, Uncooperative IP user continues to make unconstructive test edits without edit summaries after last protection. serioushat 01:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected. for two weeks by Skier Dude. For future reference, semi-protection is what you want to prevent anonymous editing; full-protection stops everyone except administrators from editing the page. sonia♫ 02:20, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection, Constant addition of unsourced information from various IPs. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:52, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of a fortnight, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Skier Dude (talk 02:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, As soon as the most recent semi-protection status expired, IP users started committing vandal-edits again. Shearonink (talk) 01:25, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Airplaneman ✈ 02:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect for two days. High level of IP activity inserting varying random numbers and contradicting results. Results are to be published on Aug 31st, which on this site means night Aug 31st - Sep 1st around midnight CET. Ulkomaalainen (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined, I'm not convinced the IP activity is disruptive, much less that it's being done in bad faith, so there doesn;t seem much cause for protection, but you may consider this leave to re-request if there is a significant spike in disruptive activity, though. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    This article was full-protected by an arbitrator, SirFozzie, until a currently ongoing arbitration case was closed.[1] However the case's resolution has been delayed and the protection has expired in the meantime. This is therefore a procedural request for re-protection, per SirFozzie's wishes to have it protected until the case's closure. As the case is nearing completion (a proposed decision was posted a week ago), I suggest a re-protection for a period of two weeks. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    With respect, if SirFozzie desired it protected for a longer duration, would he not have reprotected it himself? Unless there's something that requires immediate protection, I'd suggest you ask SirFozzie to clarify his intentions. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    SirFozzie protected it for a month in the belief (which everyone shared at the time) that the case would be over by then. Unfortunately the completion of the case was delayed beyond that timeframe. The article has been the target of extremely abusive anonymous editing for a long time, which has made it necessary to semi-protect it for almost all of its existence. Unfortunately this has expired along with the full protection. At the very least, it needs to be re-semi-protected to return it to the state immediately before SirFozzie's full protection, until SirFozzie can get around to reading his email. -- ChrisO (talk) 23:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    The page has now been protected, so this request is superseded. -- ChrisO (talk) 09:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    temp semi - Can't believe this isn't already. It's a fairly heavily targeted article due to his controversial nature. Is due to compete in about 4/5 hours and vandalism will be MASSIVE. Paralympiakos (talk) 23:19, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    Indefinite create-protection, See deleted history; this was a soft redirect to Wiktionary, but has been frequently overwritten with nonsense, hoaxes, etc. We aren't going to have an article on this, so we lose nothing by preventing the creation of nonsense here. . — Gavia immer (talk) 21:54, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Creation protected TNXMan 22:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary move-protection, Following unconfirmed reports of an alternative title some made efforts to move the page today. There have already been issues with other users changing the direct of Kelly Rowland (album) to One Woman Show (album). Kelly Rowland (album) is the best confirmed name, and although Rowland has said she is allowing fans to suggest other names unless one is decided upon the album will remain titled Kelly Rowland. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 21:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – One attempt to move the page doesn't really justify move protection. If the problem persists, feel free to re-request protection or come directly to me. — ξxplicit 22:00, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, it's a BLP with IPs saying he's dead. Blast Ulna (talk) 21:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — ξxplicit 21:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection vandalism, It keeps getting vandalized, and I think a temporary protection to see how it does would be nice. Endofskull (talk) 20:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection Vandalism Page is common target for IP original research and the page has a long standing history of vandalism and OR. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 20:34, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stifle (talk) 20:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection dispute, Intense edit war. Jerzeykydd (talk) 20:28, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    I have a better idea. The next one of either of the two of you who reverts the page gets blocked for 24 hours. How's that? :( Stifle (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined Per Stifle, and the edit-warring has ceased for now. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:17, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, A high volume of vandalism relating to staff names, and the quality of services provided in the school, some of which may be considered offensive. I've just rolled one back, and every time I come back to this page there seems to be another thing to be deleted.

    I appreciate you reading this. TGLewis (talk) 20:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined. Indefinite semi-protection is only applied where multiple increasing periods of temporary semi-protection have failed. Stifle (talk) 20:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, This article has been constantly hit and vandalized by IP's since last December whenever individual semi-protection periods end. Temporary protection is only a temporary solution it seems. DrNegative (talk) 19:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    I second the request. The film has just been re-released so the article is being hit all the time. Betty Logan (talk) 19:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Courcelles 20:36, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, indef would be great, as this article is constantly protected over and over again. IP vandalism. WhiteWriter speaks 19:18, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Stifle (talk) 20:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection. Recurrent disruptive edits have being made by IPs in the last ten days. • H☼ωdΘesI†fl∉∈ {KLAT} • 18:42, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stifle (talk) 20:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protection vandalism, lots of vandalism also some edit wars. Inka 888 18:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected indefinitely. Courcelles 20:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary full protection dispute, Constant warring over POV tag. King Öomie 18:14, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Elockid (Talk) 18:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Subject to extensive edit wars due to the nature of the Scientology. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 17:46, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Elockid (Talk) 18:33, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: The above requesting-user had previously vandalized the page, immediately before requesting protection on it. -- Cirt (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism and harassment by indef banned User:Joehazelton. — goethean ॐ 14:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Question: Is there a specific duration you want your user page to be protected? Elockid (Talk) 14:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Enabling this editor allows him to continue his wike thugry unabated. See this link for some

    history and background http://www.strippingthegurus.com/stgsamplechapters/integralcensorship.asp Note his editing history and his contentious style of ownership of wikipedia articles. Goethean considers Wikpedia his personal blog.76.203.2.26 (talk) 14:40, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Indef. This user has been using IPs with total impunity to harass me for years. Any draconian measure that you can use to decrease the amount of time that I have to spend reading his illiterate bile will be welcome. — goethean ॐ 15:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Already protected. It appears your userpage was already indefinitely semi-protected by Abecedare. TNXMan 15:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Investigating a little more, I semi-ed your talk page for a month. Please do, however, set up an unprotected sub page for IPs that legitimately want to contact you. TNXMan

    Temporary semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Dan56 (talk) 12:24, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (talk) 12:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Race (classification of humans) and Talk:Race (classification of humans)

    Requesting temporary semi-protection. Article subject to recent arb comm editor bans/restrictions and ever since an itinerant UK IP user has been cruising internet access points to post nuisance edits on both article and talk pages. Professor marginalia (talk) 07:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC) Adding Race and intelligence and Talk:Race and intelligence. Same reasons. Professor marginalia (talk) 07:11, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked.. 146.179.213.0/24 rangeblocked. Elockid (Talk) 14:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=381658480"