Jump to content

User talk:Cirt: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 391851605 by 80.179.37.179 (talk)
Undid revision 391848035 by SineBot (talk)
Line 366: Line 366:


Thanks a lot
Thanks a lot
Ido
Ido <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/80.179.37.179|80.179.37.179]] ([[User talk:80.179.37.179|talk]]) 14:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 15:33, 20 October 2010

WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia.
AFD/TT-7T-2RelistedAFDOWP:DRVWP:MFDAIVRFUBUAA/CATRFPPPERCSDABFARFAC urgentsTFARRSNBLPNFTNGAN Topic listsGoogle Search
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Other neat portal ideas for longer term

  • Longer term ideas to think about from other portals:
  1. Events section, like: "On this day" e.g., Biography, Religion, United States; "Selected anniversaries" e.g., War; "Calendar" at Holidays. Interesting idea of "Month selected anniversaries", at Oregon.
  2. Model intro with some rotating images, after Portal:Oregon, Portal:Indiana, Portal:Iceland/Intro and Portal:Philosophy of science/Intro.
  3. Revamp DYK sections w/ free-use images, model after Portal:Criminal justice and Portal:Oregon.
  4. Portal palettes at User:RichardF/Palettes/Portals. Comparable color schemes can be developed from the various hue lists at User:RichardF/Palettes. Also see Portal:Box-header.
  5. If there are a lot of categories, then categories section to 2 columns, like in Portal:Indiana.
    Also take some time to check out style/formatting at Portal:Indiana Cirt (talk)

Note to self

independent reliable secondary sources

Refs inside scroll box
<div class="reflist4" style="height: 200px; overflow: auto; padding: 3px; border: 1px solid #ababab">{{reflist|2}}</div>
Cite templates
<ref>{{cite book| last =  | first =  | authorlink =  | coauthors =  | title =  | publisher =  | year =  | location =  | page =  | url =  | doi =  | id =    | isbn = }}</ref>

<ref>{{cite news| last =  | first =  | coauthors =  | title =  | work =  | language =  | publisher =  | page =  | date =  | url =  | accessdate =  }}</ref>

<ref>{{cite journal|last =| first=| authorlink=| coauthors=|title=|journal=|volume=|issue=|page=|publisher=|location = | date = | url = | doi = | id = | accessdate = }}</ref>

<ref>{{cite web| last =  | first =  | authorlink =  | coauthors =  | title =  | work =  | publisher =  | date =  | url =  | format =  | doi =  | accessdate =  }}</ref>
Citation model

The Simpsons (season 3)

Body text in-cite
<ref name="REFNAME">[[#LASTNAME|LASTNAME]], p. PAGENUMBER</ref>
References section

(reference template from WP:CIT)

*<cite id=LASTNAME>REFERENCE</cite>
Different model

See models at The General in His Labyrinth and Mario Vargas Llosa.

More info. Cirt (talk)

More at Wikipedia:Harvard citation template examples.

And Template talk:Harvard citation no brackets.

Cirt (talk)

Dispatch

Cirt, Awadewit suggested that you might be interested in writing a Signpost Dispatch article on Featured portals (the only area of featured content we haven't covered). Sample previous articles are at {{FCDW}}. We've covered:

None of them start out looking like that: if an editor initially just chunks in some text, many others chip in to tweak it up to Signpost standards. For example, someone wrote this, which Karanacs, Royalbroil and I turned into this, so if you just chunk in some text as a start, others can help finish it off. Another example, I put in this outline, and Karanacs brought it up to this. Other editors have written almost complete and clean Dispatches without much need for other editing. If you're interested, please weigh in and coordinate at WT:FCDW In case you're interested, you could just begin sandboxing something at WP:FCDW/Portals and pop over to WT:FCDW to leave a note when you're ready for others to help out. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Will mull this over and most likely draft something up. Cirt (talk) 11:54, 18 November 2108 (UTC)[reply]

Razzies progress

Cirt (talk)

/* Your assistance please */

I request userification of Associated Press library of Guantanamo Bay detainee dossiers to User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Associated Press library of Guantanamo Bay detainee dossiers. I'd like the full revision history and talk page please.

IIRC I suggested userification on Talk:Associated Press library of Guantanamo Bay detainee dossiers over a year ago.

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 02:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. -- Cirt (talk) 03:40, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to ask additional assistance. Could you merge the history of User:Geo Swan/working/AP List with User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/Associated Press library of Guantanamo Bay detainee dossiers. Back in 2007 I didn't know one could move a page from user space to article space.
Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 02:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Miscavige

What is the purpose of improving David Miscavige' page ? --Japarthur (talk) 11:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will reply at user's talk page. -- Cirt (talk) 19:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

G8

Hi. Could you please let me know why this page (Comparison_of_knowledge_management_software) has been deleted? It seems to be a normal page like Comparison_of_FTP_client_software or Comparison_of_file_managers. And I do not see anything related to the G8. Please elaborate. Thank you in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The.aloner (talkcontribs) 12:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was deleted after WP:AFD discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of knowledge base management software. -- Cirt (talk) 12:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your quick answer. I believe there are two main problems with the page: links to external websites that make it a link farm, and non-neutral characteristics for some features. In other aspects is seems to be valuable because it gives some comparison for software in this industry. I'm learning several examples of comparison pages and it seems to me that solving these two problems may make this page more appropriate. I think I can start remaking the page. How do you think, is that better to make changes to the currently moved page or it is better to apply changes if page is undeleted? -- The.aloner (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've modified the page and removed link farm and non-neutral parts. I believe it can be undeleted now and further imporoved. The.aloner (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not seeing any WP:RS secondary source coverage. -- Cirt (talk) 11:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for EXtremeDB

An editor has asked for a deletion review of EXtremeDB. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 15:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notice, -- Cirt (talk) 20:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

129.94.130.81

Thanks for checking out the report and blocking them. The IP is rather annoying he loves to attack TeaDrinker--iGeMiNix/What's up?/My Stuff 20:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. -- Cirt (talk) 20:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No they don't

"direct quotations need cites at end of sentences. The citations cover everything that precedes them; it's unnecesary clutter to repeat the same citation after every sentence. Malleus Fatuorum 23:17, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong, but not going to revert over it. The FA will just remain in a sub-standard level of quality. -- Cirt (talk) 23:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
One of us is certainly wrong, but it isn't me. Let me just say that I find your general attitude to be apalling, and I now fully understand why Giano refused to have anything to do with your vindictive FAR campaign against him. I on the other hand will continue to work on improving this article instead of idly criticising it, despite your best efforts at sabotage. Malleus Fatuorum 23:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I have seen from your behavior in the past, that on your user talk page you do not appreciate users being impolite towards you, when they choose to go over and comment there. -- Cirt (talk) 23:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that you don't have a fucking clue what you're talking about. Malleus Fatuorum 23:32, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[1] -- Cirt (talk) 23:36, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please, I request that you do not use such language at my user talk page. -- Cirt (talk) 23:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for National Foundation for Women Legislators

RlevseTalk 06:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bacon WikiCup 2011

Pages
History
Ideas
  1. Films? — Bacon Grabbers, Canadian Bacon, Slaughterhouse (film) (aka Bacon Bits)
  2. Books? — search on authors from prior year, also: Don't Forget the Bacon! by Pat Hutchins; Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon by Craig Fass, Brian Turtle, and Mike Ginelli
  3. Drinks? — Bacon and Tomato Sandwich, Bacon Liquor & Tomato
  4. Quality upgrade? — quality upgrade on articles from prior year: Everything Tastes Better with Bacon, The Bacon Cookbook, The BLT Cookbook, Bacon: A Love Story

-- Cirt (talk) 10:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Started peer review for one from prior: Wikipedia:Peer review/Everything Tastes Better with Bacon/archive1. -- Cirt (talk) 10:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
WP:WikiProject Bacon, {{WikiProject Bacon}}, {{User Bacon}}. -- Cirt (talk) 20:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Addressed most of the stuff from the peer review. Next up: book, portal. -- Cirt (talk) 17:11, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Portal done, at Portal:Bacon. -- Cirt (talk) 11:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A word of advice

- I didn't see the Malleus/Cirt affair until today, but I have now read it and the FAR that preceded it. Without expressing any opinion on Malleus' definitions of what on earth might constitute incivility, I would like to point out that your posts throughout the FAR are exactly the kind of thing that make me dump any involvement in a FAR. In fact I've walked away from FARs, though without comment, for far less. I appreciate you were just trying to list the faults of the article as you saw them but can I ask you to read that FAR again from the mindset of someone who is trying to effect actual improvements. Can you try and understand how your tone and apparently peremptory demands may well lead an editor to just write sofixit in huge letters across the page and then push off? It's human nature. If someone instructs you to do something that you were doing anyway, you think "no, I won't!". Yours with the best of intentions, Fainites barleyscribs 10:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fainites, I thank you for the input, and especially the respectful and polite way in which you have imparted it. I will take your words under advisement in the future. -- Cirt (talk) 10:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I issued an apology to Malleus [2]. -- Cirt (talk) 06:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Nackman wiki page

October 15, 2010

Cirt,

I have made the changes you had requested and added a number of references. I was hoping we could re-instate the Alex Nackman wiki page. Please let me know.

Thanks.

Page and changes are here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Musicman5/Alex_Nackman

Musicman5 (talk) 16:49, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Mark[reply]

Please format the cites, using WP:CIT templates. -- Cirt (talk) 20:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Bacon Challenge 2011!

Since you signed up, you get an official Bacon Challenge welcome message:

Hi, Cirt, and welcome to the Bacon Challenge 2011! The goal of this event is to expand as much bacon-related content as possible, so get started whenever you can! A side event to the Bacon Challenge is the Bacon WikiCup 2011, an event where participants in the Bacon Challenge have a chance to score points for creating and expanding bacon-related content, all while trying to score as high as they can. Be sure to submit all your bacon-related contributions to the submissions page in order to score points. At the end of the Cup, the winner will get a nice trophy along with all other participants receiving a medal for their efforts (virtual, of course; don't go waiting by your mailbox for it). For any questions or comments regarding the Challenge, please head on over here, and for any questions or comments relating to the Cup, go here. Thanks and good luck. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 17:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:19, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

Another user has made the almost the same edits to 90210 (season 1) as this IP: User talk:24.18.37.151 that you blocked. User:99hgbh is the one I'm thinking is a sockpuppet of the IP. Could you please review the summary of 90210 season 1 and check out the comment here made by user:99hgbh. What do you think? I've gone ahead and reverted the edits, but I won't post on their talk page until I get your opinion on if you think it's a sockpuppetry case. Jayy008 (talk) 18:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest WP:SPI. -- Cirt (talk) 20:19, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. How active are they? Jayy008 (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I mean I would suggest you file a request for investigation at WP:SPI. -- Cirt (talk) 22:19, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have done, HERE, how long will it take you think? Jayy008 (talk) 22:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was thinking more to file it as a full, separate, actual case page. -- Cirt (talk) 22:28, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bacon!

Hi Cirt, I think you may have left a message for Dmries on my talk page (or maybe ya did a copy and paste to a few people and forgot to change the name... I've done that a few times). Either way, checking out the upcoming Bacon Challenge to see how I can participate. Best, Rob ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/CNTRB 19:40, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it, I had meant it for you too, sorry. :) -- Cirt (talk) 20:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why'd my comments get deleted?

I entered some comments in a discussion for deletion about a page I created , and the comments I made were removed, and not ony was the page deleted, it was deleted out of my profile as well. What gives? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Erafalko (talkcontribs) 05:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments were removed, apparently accidentally, by another user here: [3]. Cirt's stalker = --Jayron32 06:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing home the bacon!

The Bacon Barnstar
For all you do, this bacon's for you. Thanks for taking the bull by the horns (or the pig by the tail) and creating the most deserving WikiProject of all. Cheers. kelapstick (talk) 08:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much! Most appreciated, -- Cirt (talk) 08:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate canvassing

Posting an invitation to join the bacon project on 70 user talk pages (I think I did two edits on that page over three years ago) is inappropriate canvassing, in my opinion. Han-Kwang (t) 10:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Um, it is just an invitation, take it or leave it. There is no ongoing discussion that could be seen as being influenced. -- Cirt (talk) 10:48, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Hi Cirt, Please explain what does 'relist' for more discussion mean on the Catholic views on Mary AfD? Thanks.Malke 2010 (talk) 16:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Means it will continue to be discussed for seven days, or until another admin comes by and determines there is a consensus and able to close it. -- Cirt (talk) 20:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Afd close

Per your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Hakim Jan (Argandab druglord), you may want to have a look at Abdul Hakim Jan (Argandab warlord). Thanks! Location (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. -- Cirt (talk) 20:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Silvio Pollio

Hi, Thanks for protecting the page. I sure picked an interesting one to learn about wikipedia editing. LOL. Anyhow, I was wondering why you added the refimproveBLP tag to the page. 3 different major canadian newspapers, plus a couple smaller locals are referenced. I even found the court documents via google search, but thought I read somewhere those should not be used? However: Policy shortcut: WP:WELLKNOWN clearly states = "In the case of public figures, there will be a multitude of reliable published sources, and BLPs should simply document what these sources say. If an allegation or incident is notable, relevant, and well-documented, it belongs in the article—even if it is negative and the subject dislikes all mention of it. So could the refimprove BLP tag be removed please. Or could you clarify for me what would need to be improved? Thanks.Bluebadger1 (talk) 17:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC) Also commented on BLP boards for reference. [4] Bluebadger1 (talk) 17:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at WP:BLPN. -- Cirt (talk) 20:17, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bacon

Congrats on making WikiProject Bacon. I joined too. I saw you use the Bacon Donut image i got to VP status for the Project, i thought it was a good image too.Spongie555 (talk) 19:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and yes it was. ;) -- Cirt (talk) 20:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portal move

I'm currently checking into doing this, however, I believe it is possible for me to complete the task. Please note that this may take a little bit of time, as I must set it up and get it approved; perhaps around 2 weeks (I'll see if I can move it through BAG faster because it's a smaller task). THENEWMONO 04:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deshastha Brahmin

A while back you reviewed Deshastha Brahmin in response to a GA nomination but it didn't pass at that time. I've re-nominated it after a peer review, copy-edit, and the changes you had recommended. Just wanted to let you know of the nomination since you had mentioned back then to notify you of the re-nomination. Zuggernaut (talk) 06:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 19:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just wondering if you had an interest in reviewing it again. Zuggernaut (talk) 04:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Cirt, I owe you a couple of apologies. After we spoke off-wiki, I realized that it would have been better to post a question about your behaviour at FAR to your talk page, as Fainites did above. There was no reason for me to complain about your behaviour at Sandy's page without trying your talk page first, particularly since you and I are not complete strangers and have occasionally interacted in the past. I read a quite negative construction into your actions instead of assuming good faith, and I apologize for that too. The off-wiki conversation has made it clear to me that you did not intend your actions to be construed as they were. I hope that we can avoid any more misunderstandings. Thanks, and I hope you can forgive me for not talking to you first. -- Mike Christie (talk) 16:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. This is most appreciated. -- Cirt (talk) 16:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

De brief voor de Koning

Sure and it's my pleasure; happy to be of help. Excellent article; keep up the good work! --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:16, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ;) -- Cirt (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cirt. I apologize for bothering you repeatedly ... I left a comment at the Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons, however, my note remained unnoticed. Should I move the section to the bottom of the noticeboard? Thanks for any help/advice. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. -- Cirt (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay thanks. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:07, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me please?

The article Tom Quinn (Spooks) quickfailed GA because the article was in a need of a copyedit. Since you previously worked on Adam Carter. I was wondering if you can copyedit that article for me. Thank you. -- Matthew RD 14:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will take a look. -- Cirt (talk) 14:48, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest you follow the advice of the GA Reviewer, and take the article to peer review before going for GAN again. The GA Reviewer in particular is one I have come across to have sound judgment, so I would advise against contesting the review itself. -- Cirt (talk) 14:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Email...

Hi Cirt, I got your email. I prefer not to take part in off-wiki discussions if I can help it; it's rare that I'm up on my emails anyway - sometimes I go weeks without checking it. Karanacs (talk) 14:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. No worries, -- Cirt (talk) 14:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

You deleted the access date. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 16:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I deleted the URL as well, so there is no longer a need for an accessdate to state when the URL was last accessed. -- Cirt (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No you didn't... OrangeDog (τ • ε) 16:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thank you for pointing that out.  Done! -- Cirt (talk) 16:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pennsylvania Chronicle

Hi Cirt, I was thinking about creating the page Pennsylvania Chronicle and discovered that a page with this name was deleted once before. Before and if I take on such an undertaking I would be interested in knowing why the previous article was deleted. The approach for the article I have in mind will be on an historic level, covering the paper's involvement in the American Revoulution and will highlight people like William Goddard, the paper's founder, and Benjamin Franklin who also was associated with the publication. Any advice and other information you may have would be greatly appreciated. All the best. -- GWillHickers (talk) 21:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was deleted, after AFD, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Chronicle. -- Cirt (talk) 06:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IP 82.5.224.162 is now 86.29.113.118

Hi there. Just wanted to let you know that the IP address you blocked 82.5.224.162 has resurfaced under the IP 86.29.113.118. S/he seems to be vandalizing the same articles on the new IP. 90.201.150.226 (talk) 22:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest you try WP:AIV or file a report, at WP:SPI. -- Cirt (talk) 06:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've just noticed that there seem to have been two organisations of that name, one in England (... Centre, redirecting to Scientology in the United Kingdom), and the other one founded by Mayo (... Center). Do you know if they were somehow related? --JN466 23:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am not yet certain, but it would seem to be the same or similar or related. I note you have still yet failed to place a notice at the talk page of Advanced Ability Center regarding material taken from the article David Miscavige, in order to satisfy copyright? -- Cirt (talk) 06:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We would like your help concluding the FAC for Roger Waters. — GabeMc (talk) 03:31, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will try to take a look. -- Cirt (talk) 06:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article

Hello.

Just wondering how I can get an article up? I mean, someone tried, a pro writer, and it was deleted. I have all links and facts proving the article. Please help. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oplexicon (talkcontribs) 11:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note to self - portal Bacon

Portal:Bacon -- additions, help, etc. -- Cirt (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on making Portal Bacon it looks good. Spongie555 (talk) 23:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see your really good with Portals. Could you help me in Portal:Bhutan. I made it but I'm bad with portals and the only help I'm getting is from someone in Russian wikipedia. Spongie555 (talk) 23:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you liked my efforts at Portal:Bacon, I would suggest you look there for ways to reformat Portal:Bhutan. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 02:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jason calling...

Cirt, since you're on duty (haha), what to do about this, The Bourn Legacy (film)? Simply blank and redirect? Merge and redirect? What I mean is, what are you going to do, with your administrative and moral powers, since I'm going to bed? Thanks! (Oh, you'll be pleased to know that my daughter went shopping with me and picked the most expensive bacon they had in the supermarket, thick-sliced and applewood-smoked.) Drmies (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, merged the two page histories together. -- Cirt (talk) 05:19, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI

Nom here was actually a banned editor - Alison 06:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, thanks! -- Cirt (talk) 06:22, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question about a deleted page

Hi,

My name is Ido, C Few month ago we added our page to Wikipedia, and for some reason it was deleted and cannot be edited now. Page location was: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shvoong

We accept your concern about high quality in Wikipedia, and would like to know how can we improve our page to be acceptable, high quality, and suit the Wikipedia site. Any remark, demand or suggestion will be treated, and actions will be taken as necessary.

Thanks a lot Ido