Jump to content

Talk:Main Page: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Appeal re ITN candidate: fix Kevin's link
Line 114: Line 114:


:::Never mind, then! [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 23:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
:::Never mind, then! [[User:Sca|Sca]] ([[User talk:Sca|talk]]) 23:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

== Drupal website development makes your work easy! ==

For any company, a website is the most essential part for the exposure of a company. In today’s world, internet is the most popular and widely visited area by all consumers and hence it is proved to be the most affordable and easy on pockets when compared to advertisements and Publicity. Let it be an official website or a personal blog, a website is not only a medium of accurate information and source of knowledge but also a website which gives a person a better mind set about the company and presentation. If you are wondering what Drupal is, then yes, it’s an open source content management service (CMS) which is written in PHP language. It is the much easily assessable when implied for any website. Drupal Development gives you vast source of data and information will let you help in creating a very friendly and simple website no matter what kind of field your website belongs.
'''Outsource your project with Openwave'''

When it comes to [http://www.openwavecomp.com/drupal_website_development.html Drupal Website Development], it is the main requirement for any basic website. For any website, domain registration, design, theme for your web page and tabs you would have in your page and of course page structuring is important. And the content you post on your website needs to be important, accurate and free from grammatical spelling errors. You can find applications through which you can work by adding proper codes and then incorporating it in your website. If you understand the applications as you have to, this will be helpful in structuring a website for your company or even your own blog. In the market, there are many website development companies which will help you in outsourcing their projects within your budget yet varied in designs and structure of every website. At openwave, we provide you with in-depth detailed information about the design layouts of web pages and even design structures available for you and which can be used for your website.

Revision as of 07:22, 1 August 2012

Archives: Sections of this page older than three days are automatically relocated to the newest archive.

001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 010 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063 064 065 066 067 068 069 070 071 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 085 086 087 088 089 090 091 092 093 094 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207

Main Page error report

To report an error in content currently or imminently on the Main Page, use the appropriate section below.

  • Where is the error? An exact quotation of the text in question helps.
  • Offer a correction if possible.
  • References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error.
  • Time zones. The Main Page runs on Coordinated Universal Time (UTC, currently 17:30 on 25 December 2024) and is not adjusted to your local time zone.
  • Can you resolve the problem yourself? If the error lies primarily in the content of an article linked from the Main Page, fix the problem there before reporting it here. Text on the Main Page generally defers to the articles with bolded links. Upcoming content on the Main Page is usually only protected from editing beginning 24 hours before its scheduled appearance. Before that period, you can be bold and fix any issues yourself.
  • Do not use {{edit fully-protected}} on this page, which will not get a faster response. It is unnecessary, because this page is not protected, and causes display problems. (See the bottom of this revision for an example.)
  • No chit-chat. Lengthy discussions should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as the talk page of the relevant article or project.
  • Respect other editors. Another user wrote the text you want changed, or reported an issue they see in something you wrote. Everyone's goal should be producing the best Main Page possible. The compressed time frame of the Main Page means sometimes action must be taken before there has been time for everyone to comment. Be civil to fellow users.
  • Reports are removed when resolved. Once an error has been addressed or determined not to be an error, or the item has been rotated off the Main Page, the report will be removed from this page. Check the revision history for a record of any discussion or action taken; no archives are kept.

Errors in the summary of the featured article

Please do not remove this invisible timestamp. See WT:ERRORS and WP:SUBSCRIBE. - Dank (push to talk) 01:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Errors with "In the news"

Errors in "Did you know ..."

This looks like an error
Promoted to Prep 2 here on 18 December
Swapped to Queue 6 here on 20 December by Crisco 1492 but not removed from Prep 2 TSventon (talk) 11:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh, that's my bad. When I promoted that queue, I recognized that as something I had reviewed earlier, but didn't notice we had just run it. Good catch! I'll pull it. RoySmith (talk) 14:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • now-lost: I think "lost" is sufficient here. — RAVENPVFF · talk · 15:52, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in "On this day"

(December 27)
(December 30)

General discussion


Of our four above-the-fold items, two have relatively static content: TFA is chosen well ahead of time, and OTD only covers events of previous years. Meanwhile, DYK has a link directly to the proposals page, but ITN has no link to WP:ITN/C. Why don't we add one? Nyttend (talk) 03:41, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it's difficult to find where to make a proposal for ITN. I only found it by doing a search for "in the news", which isn't really very user friendly. Richerman (talk) 12:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You mean apart from the link in the whopping great yellow tag on the top of this page and in the box above the edit window for this page? — foxj 13:48, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose. There is a long-standing consensus that the Main Page is aimed at readers, not editors. Anyone who wants to nominate an item can find the link at the top of this page, and in the edit notice for this page, and in the toolbox above. Note that we don't have links to the equivalents for other days e.g. WP:TFAR and TT:DYK. Modest Genius talk —Preceding undated comment added 15:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Err, yes we do: see the footer of the DYK slot. "Archive – Start a new article – Nominate an article" (linked to WP:Recent additions, WP:Your first article and TT:DYK respectively. BencherliteTalk 15:55, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, that's news to me. My mistake. Modest Genius talk 16:05, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I never would think to come to the Main Page's talk page to look for links to the ITN candidates page, and even after the whopping great non-yellow tag was mentioned, it took me a while to find the links to ITN/C. Despite my familiarity with DYK (or perhaps because of it), my first proposal at ITN/C required me to search essentially every non-archive page associated with the ITN process before I found the candidates page. The other sections aren't comparable, because their nomination processes work very differently from those of ITN and DYK. Nyttend backup (talk) 17:02, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't imagine why it would have taken you so long to find ITN/C. Like DYK, every page has a template linking to the key pages in the process. -- tariqabjotu 21:06, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
While it's not discussing this page, a portion of WP:RFD#KEEP is relevant here: "If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful [, but] this is...because you browse Wikipedia in different ways." If we need to provide a link for nominating newly created articles for DYK, why would it be bad to provide a link for nominating newly updated articles? I understand David Levy's comment (although I disagree with his belief that it will cause substantial problems), but unless you say that you agree with him or you provide another rationale, I won't be able to understand your opposition. Nyttend (talk) 02:41, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Where did I say I opposed your suggestion? I simply questioned the fact that you found it so difficult to find ITN/C, even though it's linked from so many pages. We can lead a horse to water, but we can't force it to drink. You, involved in a similar process on the Main Page and apparently familiar with Wikipedia as a whole, were incapable of finding WP:ITN/C despite it being linked at the top of numerous relevant pages in a box — e.g. Talk:Main Page, Portal:Current events, Portal talk:Current events, Template:In the news, Wikipedia:In the news. If all those links were insufficient to get an experienced editor to this page, I don't know why or how you believe one more will make the difference. And, frankly, if someone can't find this page, despite being linked through all these pages, I don't see why we desperately need to get him or her to that page. ITN/C already receives a large number of nominations that ultimately aren't accepted for ITN. Why on Earth should we be encouraging people, who can't follow a simple link found on many relevant pages, to just waltz in and make a nomination? The criteria for DYK are a lot more straightforward. Contributing to ITN at least requires that people understand its purpose and its international scope. At the same time, there are far fewer blurbs that could possibly make their way into ITN (i.e. it's impossible to keep track of all the new and updated articles for DYK, but one just needs to glance at certain news sites to get an idea of what may be put onto ITN). Putting a link that says "Click here to nominate" right on the Main Page will cause many people to bypass reading about the section and result in an even greater number of nominations being rejected. Honestly, it's linked in enough places already. Squeezing another link in ITN to appease people who need to "search essentially every non-archive page associated with the ITN process" before a page that was probably linked on all of them is downright unnecessary. -- tariqabjotu 22:27, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see this is basically what David Levy said below. -- tariqabjotu 22:33, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Umm, when you tell me that I'm an idiot for being unable to find the page and don't deserve to make a nomination because I can't find it, why am I supposed to take that as meaning that you agree with the suggestion? Even more, when you say "what I said is basically what another opposer said", why am I supposed to understand that as support? I suggest that you read this page and adjust your comments accordingly — stop thinking that people who don't navigate the way you do are less capable. Nyttend (talk) 02:01, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Saying that you feel there's already plenty of links to somewhere doesn't necessarily mean you oppose a suggestion for another link. Note that Tariqabjotu remark was clearly addressed at their earlier comments where they said nothing about not 'deserve to make a nomination' only commented that they didn't understand why it took you so long to find ITNC. Note also that you can be neither in support or opposed to a suggestion. In fact it's perfectly resonably neutral about a suggestion when you don't understand the reason it's felt necessary. (Note as well even if someone doesn't feel something is necessary it doesn't mean they're opposed to a suggestion but that wasn't even what TA said. In fact plenty of times I've said I'm not opposed to a suggestion but don't don't see it as necessary.) Nil Einne (talk) 06:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's much easier for newcomers to understand why an article should be nominated for DYK. ITN is commonly mistaken for a news ticker, even among some of the editors arriving at WP:ITN/C now. A direct link from ITN probably would cause the nomination page to be flooded with requests that [insert news story not covered in the encyclopedia] be added. —David Levy 17:50, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No Olympics?

Excellent decision on choosing an American baseball player instead of the precious Olympics

No Olympics even in In The News? Considering that both Olympic Games and Cotswold Olimpick Games are Featured Articles, it seems wilfully perverse to have Today's Featured Article be on one of the few sports that isn't featured in the Olympics, on the day that most sports fans would agree is the most important day in the sporting calendar. 78.149.153.211 (talk) 07:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In The News usually waits until the opening ceremony occurs to post the Games began, which seems to be the consensus again this year.Boznia 08:18, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Those are good suggestions to post at WP:TFA/R for the day of the closing ceremony. Go make the suggestion! --Dweller (talk) 08:30, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, it's been cancelled. See you in Rio. Lugnuts (talk) 08:46, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Watch out, Boris will get you. The geiger counter of Olympomania went zoink. --Dweller (talk) 09:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently this was suggested at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests#Olympic games as early as 2 July, but no one seemed to notice. Having Olympic Games as TFA on the closing day would be better than not at all, but still it's a shame that today's opportunity was missed. Not enough people seem to know about WP:TFAR. --202.28.181.200 (talk) 09:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's a shame, but the comment on the talk page wasn't as helpful as it could have been. --Dweller (talk) 09:54, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Watch out - I doubt the Wikimedia Foundation is an official sponsor of the games, might get sued. - filelakeshoe 09:58, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If Olympic Games went to the main page as WP:TFA, it would almost certainly end up before WP:FAR because it isn't. Olympics will be more than adequately covered to a degree by Did You Know to the point where people will hate on it. --LauraHale (talk) 10:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't what? --Dweller (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It wasn't selected for Today's featured article. --LauraHale (talk) 11:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weren't you saying it wasn't up to FA calibre (i.e. isn't a FA)? That's what it sounded like to me. Nil Einne (talk) 12:33, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't worthy of being referred to as 'featured'. It's in poor shape. Full of the poor referencing mechanism using {{rp}}, for example. That thing should be deleted. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 11:02, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We have a procedure. Until it's delisted, it's eligible for TFA. --Dweller (talk) 12:27, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't looked in to the article but is it really that bad? I thought may be it was promoted a long time ago but in fact it was promoted in 2009 (it was promoted and delisted earlier). I'm not that familiar with the citation wars but my impression is there's no requirement to use any particular style in an article, as with many areas of wikipedia the only requirement is for intra article consistency and not changing without good reason. Definitely if rp is depriciated both the template and Wikipedia:Citing sources surely should say this. Yet I seem to remember someone seeking consensus for change to rp in an article a few weeks ago. (Editors are of course entilted to their own personal preferences, but they should make it clear these are their personal preferences which won't generally actually affect things like whether or not an article is an FA.) Nil Einne (talk) 12:31, 27 July 2012 (UTC) P.S. I do agree give the DYK and likelihood of a sticky ITN, an Olympics FA isn't that important. We do try to avoid an item beig in too many areas anyway. Nil Einne (talk) 13:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
At the risk of hijacking this thread, what's wrong with {{rp}}? I use it all the time. howcheng {chat} 17:21, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing. If you object to it, nominate it for deletion and prepare for the discomfort of those of us who rely on it heavily. Nyttend (talk) 02:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is a very poor decision for today's featured article. Rather than some baseball player we could have post the Olympic Games, but no, the nitpickers must always butt in. The article is totally OK and no citation corrections should be made...--GoPTCN 12:38, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    It might have been an active consideration given the huge surge of Olympics DYKs prepared for the coming days and weeks; plus ITN is likely to post the opening ceremonies. It's nice to have some corner of the main page not be about whatever current event is going on. GRAPPLE X 12:43, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What's the rush? Articles only ever get featured once. There will be other Olympiads. Wikipedia will still be around. APL (talk) 19:19, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Google has an Olympic theme every day. Would have been nice to do the same here rather than random pages every day. What's the rush to feature Giraffe or Aries? There's always next month. 2.28.96.100 (talk) 16:27, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We do have an Olypmic theme every day; scroll down to DYK or look to ITN and there's a constant Olympic presence. GRAPPLE X 16:30, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately the main page is too stuffy and too cluttered. Most users aren't going to see them that much. Even if for just two weeks the front page was given a makeover for an event like this. 2.28.96.100 (talk) 16:52, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

its symbol is [image] (Unicode ♈)

Why do we need the image and the reference to unicode? Wouldn't "its symbol is ♈" do just as well? Formerip (talk) 00:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And really ... a phallic symbol on the Main Page! What do we think we are, the German Wikipedia? Daniel Case (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We'll have those "Chinese twin inspectors" after us! and sorry to see the Marshall Islands not linked. In fact where, exactly, do these Chinese twin inspectors come from? Can't actually find any other reference anywhere in Wikipedia. Bond (Chinese constellation) gives us "the Train of a garment" and "the Left Watch", but no mention of Chinese twin inspectors. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The image overshoots the ascenders and descenders of the text and is as clear smaller: can it be reduced in size to align with the text? 86.185.178.114 (talk) 11:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. Raul654 (talk) 13:34, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A change from sports- or country- centric complaints about the main page. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nobody seems too bothered someone who knows about the Chinese Zodiac, has now pointed out that they were, in fact, "an inspector of ponds and marshes" and a "an official in charge of pasture distribution", not in fact "twin inspectors" at all. All explained by Julius D. W. Staal (1988), well mostly anyway. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sports events on the main page

I have started a request for comment here about what sporting events should be automatically posted to In The News. Formerip (talk) 01:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest 'emphasis on obscure sports' - eg Trobriand cricket - thus fulfilling the Main Page's remit to alert people to topics they didn't know existed (but find interesting). 93.97.45.17 (talk) 09:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal re ITN candidate

I'm sorry but although I've been editing on Wiki for years, the ITN candidate process is too confusing for non-techie old analog me. I wanted to nominate Rūta Meilutytė's gold medal in the 100m breaststroke on Aug. 31, making her the first Lithuanian swimmer since Lithuania's Declaration of Independence from the Soviet Union in 1990 to earn an Olympic medal in swimming. At age 15, she is also the youngest Lithuanian athlete to win an Olympic gold medal. (Ref: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/olympics/18906960) (Pic: Meilutyte.jpg) Perhaps one of you cyberwonks could take this on? Sca (talk) 22:27, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ITN/C would be the place, but it stands not the remotest chance. Kevin McE (talk) 23:09, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, then! Sca (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Drupal website development makes your work easy!

For any company, a website is the most essential part for the exposure of a company. In today’s world, internet is the most popular and widely visited area by all consumers and hence it is proved to be the most affordable and easy on pockets when compared to advertisements and Publicity. Let it be an official website or a personal blog, a website is not only a medium of accurate information and source of knowledge but also a website which gives a person a better mind set about the company and presentation. If you are wondering what Drupal is, then yes, it’s an open source content management service (CMS) which is written in PHP language. It is the much easily assessable when implied for any website. Drupal Development gives you vast source of data and information will let you help in creating a very friendly and simple website no matter what kind of field your website belongs.

Outsource your project with Openwave

When it comes to Drupal Website Development, it is the main requirement for any basic website. For any website, domain registration, design, theme for your web page and tabs you would have in your page and of course page structuring is important. And the content you post on your website needs to be important, accurate and free from grammatical spelling errors. You can find applications through which you can work by adding proper codes and then incorporating it in your website. If you understand the applications as you have to, this will be helpful in structuring a website for your company or even your own blog. In the market, there are many website development companies which will help you in outsourcing their projects within your budget yet varied in designs and structure of every website. At openwave, we provide you with in-depth detailed information about the design layouts of web pages and even design structures available for you and which can be used for your website.