Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
PhilS223 (talk | contribs)
28 edits
→‎Phil Sokowicz: new section
Line 616: Line 616:
Their work as a producer is continually growing and more references are becoming available soon. —[[Special:Contributions/76.89.243.88|76.89.243.88]] ([[User talk:76.89.243.88|talk]]) 19:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Their work as a producer is continually growing and more references are becoming available soon. —[[Special:Contributions/76.89.243.88|76.89.243.88]] ([[User talk:76.89.243.88|talk]]) 19:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
:<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px|link=|]] '''Done''' – as an [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]], the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.<!-- End Template:UND - afc --> &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
:<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:Yes check.svg|18px|link=|]] '''Done''' – as an [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]] submission deleted under [[WP:CSD#G13|CSD G13]], the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.<!-- End Template:UND - afc --> &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 20:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

== Phil Sokowicz ==

*{{revisions|Phil Sokowicz}}
I want to work on it using edit-request. —[[User:PhilS223|PhilS223]] ([[User talk:PhilS223|talk]]) 21:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:18, 30 April 2020

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests to unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests to unprotect, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.
    This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here).

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:

    Enter the page's title:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion


    User:Kudpung/Anti vandal centre

    To move it to a new location to fix red links. —Wylie39 (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorry, no. A deletion in my user sub space stays deleted unless it is required as evidence in a serious, major issue . The community should not benefit from my work in my sub pages. Red links can be simply removed. And I note the lack of courtesy, Wylie39, in not asking me directly in the first place. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Prisoner of Heaven

    I, Themrkiko, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Themrkiko (talk) 11:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Brandon Tatum

    Could I please have this entry restored and moved to draftspace? I'd like to have a look at it. There's been some news coverage since it closed. The closing admin doesn't do restorations and sent me here. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:11, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The deleting administrator, User:Sandstein, sent me here. I am not seeking to overturn the deletion outcome I would like to work on the deleted article in draftspace. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:38, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    FloridaArmy, I get wary about this sort of request due to my fear it'll be used as an endaround around the AfD. But if Sandstein sent you here, I'll do it. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:46, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks. Not sure if it matters but the deletion was I think a year ago and there has been some coverage since. I wasn't involved in the deletion discussion and have never seen the article. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:54, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    FloridaArmy, oh duh. I thought the AfD was 2020. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:09, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Anirudh pratap singh baghel Semariya

    Anirudh pratap singh baghel Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anirudh pratap singh baghel Semariya (talk • contribs) 04:32, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Rooster

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Fredsmäklare (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done The page isn't deleted. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:41, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Dinatriuminosinat

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Fredsmäklare (talk) 05:27, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Fredsmäklare, what page are you wanting undeleted? – Muboshgu (talk) 18:43, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Gerard Drieman

    I, Hjlindhout, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hjlindhout (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    The information of this man, Gerard Drieman, is about a curious way of composing in the Netherlands. As far as I know, there was no one else composing in this style. This fact is important so musicologists may be triggered to have a starting point about composing in the Netherlands around WWII. Because I don't understand the rules of Wikipedia how to put the page in the right mode or: what I need to change to get this information as accepted, it would be great to have help about this. There is not so many information which can be proved by documents except the score themselves and the Phd Research he made. So, there is no commercial intention or whatsoever... —Hjlindhout (talk) 07:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Medea7/Family Justice Center

    I, Medea7, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Medea7 (talk) 11:21, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:45, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Central Asian-American Enterprise Fund

    I, Stevenmitchell, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:48, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Elmer T Lee

    I, 96lt1ss, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96lt1ss (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello! The revised versions of this article were deleted for copyright violations. This was entirely correct, and I’m legitimately sorry for any trouble which I caused. It was not my intention, and I definitely should have realized my mistake. Is there any way to make it possible for me to see the most recent deleted version of the page, before anything was removed (I believe the last such revision was made by a user called Rodw). There was a lot of legitimate good content added and edits done to the page in the last month. But sadly they were all lost (even the ones which didn't violate anything), because of the restoration that was needed. I’m 100% willing to add everything again, this time entirely properly done and reworded. But it makes it much more difficult without being able to actually see the differences. But of course, it requires special user permissions to see those deleted versions. Which makes it much more difficult to fix the article, and also make it so the additions which came from users that weren’t me will probably be entirely lost. If there is any way possible, may I please get access to compare that deleted article with the current edition? —BorderRegions (talk) 12:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Looking at the history it does look like there was selected removal of content from https://www.theindychannel.com/news/local-news/indianapolis/indiana-school-shootings-a-comprehensive-list-of-the-last-130-years and https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/13/africa/uganda-school-fire-intl/index.html.
    What I see removed, not done by you is adding Januuary 27, 2019 Naperville, Illinois; someone added some punishments; everything else was minor. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:50, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:CaseTalk

    I, Marco.wobben, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Marco.wobben (talk) 15:47, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Marie-Claire Saindon

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Figtua (talk) 19:24, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lectrodryer

    I, Jeepsportster, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jeepsportster (talk) 20:55, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Clint Basinger

    I, Daemonspudguy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Daemonspudguy (talk) 00:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Tufelhundin/Frost call

    I'm not finished working on this page.Thanks. —Tufelhundin (talk) 07:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Athribis Project

    I, Henqet, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Henqet (talk) 09:39, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Thomas Greene Rankin

    I, Mollyz11953, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mollyz11953 (talk) 13:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:16, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    cosmicbeats

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Cosmicbeats (talk) 14:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Malia Obama

    I, Paintspot, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paintspot Infez (talk) 14:34, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:15, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Pemberton Holmes Real Estate

    I, 99.243.125.25, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 99.243.125.25 (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:16, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Lee Everett.jpg

    File was being used on the fict. character page Lee Everett. The image was replaced in the article on Sept 25 2019 [1] but based on the logs for the replaced image [2] this was from a banned use under evasion, so the new image was deleted and the image stripped from the infobox. This left the original image (being requested here) as unused, never brought back to replace the deleted image, which was deleted as orphan 7 days later. This image was "fine" for NFCC use (though looking at the deleted page history, the rational could be improved a notch but it is being used for an infobox pic of a notable fictional character. —Masem (t) 17:16, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a non-free file deleted as orphaned, this has been restored upon request. Please note that the file needs to be de-orphaned within 7 days, otherwise it may be deleted again per CSD F5. Once the file is in use on an article, please remove the {{di-orphaned fair use}} tag. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Category:Users who are new to WP: Mac Henni

    I am using this as a self-maintnence category. —Maccore Henni Mii! Pictochat Mii! (Note: respond on minha (my) talk page) 19:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G2. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:31, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Next.js

    Circumstances have changed — there are multiple quality sources about the subject and I'd like to request publishing —Sarupbanskota (talk) 21:46, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Elise By Olsen

    I, Loveolsen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Loveolsen (talk) 05:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:32, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Aaron Martin

    I, JoshsNow, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JoshsNow (talk) 08:59, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Alexey Youssef

    This page should not be speedily deleted because The person the article talks about meets the notability criteria. I went through the notability criteria and I would like to highlight that Alexey meets both the basic and additional criteria: Basic criteria: Alexey has been covered in the following secondary sources: Printed and online press (In Arabic):

    https://www.sana.sy/?p=806199

    https://www.arabstoday.net/498/013347-أليكسي-أول-سوري-يحصل-على-منحة-رودز-للدراسة-في-أوكسفورد

    http://pen-sy.com/?p=25053

    http://esyria.sy/sites/code/index.php?site=latakia&p=stories&category=ideas&filename=201810151235121&fbclid=IwAR0puBfwc-WQVeTG2wOCHJVW3- ajjPlg_VkEwmfJvmqBvMLT3sunRqRQGAk

    http://www.alwehdaonline.sy/index.php/since/19308-2017-11-26-16-23-51

    http://www.alwehdaonline.sy/index.php/news-2/17449-2017-04-05-10-40-16 Primary sources TV:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DZ0XpQNW-4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATxh6xGe4ac&feature=youtu.be Articles, weblinks: https://www.rhodeshouse.ox.ac.uk/scholars/rhodes-scholars-class-of-2018/alexey-youssef/ https://rhodesincubator.com/blog/2020/3/2/rhodes-incubator-entrepreneur-highlight-alexey-youssef-founder-of-keea-inc https://europeansting.com/tag/alexey-youssef/ https://international.weill.cornell.edu/alexey-youssef https://www.imtj.com/articles/lessons-front-line/

    Additional criteria

    Alexey fulfils the first criteria in the additional criteria list: ("The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for such an award several times.")

    1. He is the first Syrian to be awarded the Rhodes Scholarship, which is considered the most prestigious scholarship globally with previous scholars like President Bill Clinton and secretary Condoleezza Rice (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodes_Scholarship)

    2. He has been granted an Exceptional Talent in Digital Technolgy visa from the UK (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Points-based_immigration_system_(United_Kingdom)#Tier_1_(Exceptional_Talent))

    Here is an example from Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hila_Levy

    She is basically covered only because she is a Rhodes Scholar according to her references Thanks for your time! 

    —Nabila4535 (talk) 11:15, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
    Assuming you mean User:Nabila4535. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Francisco Varlcarcel

    The page was deleted without any prior notification or discussion and sources were easily found and available. —The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 13:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done The article was converted into a redirect. Check the edit history. It's all there, no edits were deleted. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Muboshgu: Sorry about that. I did see that but was in a haze when I created the request. In a haze. Thanks.--The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 06:18, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Arjoccolenty

    User:Arjoccolenty · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

    Not sure that I am doing this right but if I'm not maybe somebody will be able to help me since what happened was out of the blue and I didn't expect it to happen. On my user page in my history I had pages that I had saved because I was working on a personal project but out of the blue they got deleted by an administrator with no warning. The information that I lost I was gonna come back to and I did manage to get some of it back after I asked the administrator but I am asking for all of it back. If I can't get it back, can I at least have the content e-mailed to me? I will acknowledge that I used Wikipedia as a web host but I didn't know it was against the rules and if I get the information back I will never do it again. Arjoccolenty (talk) 15:29, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:39, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Cavitycolors

    I, MatthewHoobin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Matthew - (talk) 17:36, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:40, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Benjamin GASIGWA

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —O.G.n.T.B.D.ME 21:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    It exists as Draft:Benjamin Gasigwa – Muboshgu (talk) 23:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    No longer, deleted as an advert. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:25, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:TechRyde

    I, Mahalsandeep, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mahalsandeep (talk) 22:57, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 23:43, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:Archive box/doc

    Please restore the edit history of this page and then redirect the page to Template:Archives/doc. Template:Archive box/doc serves as a historical archive of the template's former contents in the event more may want to be used later ... which is what I was attempting to do in order to see how this template formerly worked, but then found out that this documentation page was deleted... —Steel1943 (talk) 23:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 23:45, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Oneasia2011/sandbox

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Oneasia2011 (talk) 04:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Oneasia2011/sandbox

    I have been leaving the unfinished manuscript of the page, thinking that it would be there at all times and not face deletion, as it had been done.

    I would like to continue to update the manuscript to complete it for your evaluation. Looking forward to receiving a confirmation of the un-deletion notice.

    George Kunihiro Author of Oneasia2011/sandbox

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Sulphur Springs (TV series)

    Creator Amaury has asked me to request on his behalf that this be undeleted, but at User:Amaury/sandbox/Sulphur Springs (TV series) rather than being restored to Draft:Sulphur Springs (TV series). He wishes to continue working on this draft. Thanks. —--IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Toys “R” Us Canada Logo.jpeg

    PD-ineligble per File:Toys "R" Us logo.svg. Please undelete previous versions. —Jonteemil (talk) 23:35, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Is the maple leaf PD as well? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Graeme Bartlett: When reading the legal documents my interpretation is that Canada does not enforce copyright on the maple leaf, but they do however enforce the trademark. Therefor it is PD however the trademark issue seems to be a bit more complex.Jonteemil (talk) 12:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jonteemil: Is there any reason you need this raster file given that File:Toys “R” Us Canada logo.svg exists? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:18, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @King of Hearts: I personally don't need the file, however I never nominate superseded files with different filetypes for deletion. If you want to you may though. Until then, the previous versions should be undeleted.Jonteemil (talk) 14:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Graeme Bartlett: Also File:Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet Logo.svg and File:TikTok logo.svg.Jonteemil (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I have unhidden the previous revisions of those two (but they were all smaller) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Graeme Bartlett: Thanks. Why not on the Toys r us logo as well?Jonteemil (talk) 19:29, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lee Munnich

    I, Tzi80, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tzi80 (talk) 01:05, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    I am interested in updating this draft page with some new information about the subject, to submit for review. Is it possible to restore the page? Thank you! —Tzi80 (talk) 01:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Salah Eddin Zaimeche Al-Djazair

    This article was deleted via an expired WP:PROD and I ask for it to be restored. —MarkZusab (talk) 02:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Dr. Johannes Vrana/sandbox

    I was in the very beginning of drafting this article about Prof. Dr. Ripudaman Singh in my Sandbox. Ripudaman Singh is one of the most forward seeing and notable persons in Nondestructive testing and Innovation management. He started the areas of reliability and PoD within the American Society for Nondestructive Testing. He is currently leading the activities for the new area called NDE 4.0. Dr. Singh has authored 4 Books and dozens of papers. He was an invited key-note speaker at multiple conferences. Therefore, please undelete this draft of an article. It will take a couple more weeks for me to work on it and to collect all the necessary references. —Dr. Johannes Vrana (talk) 07:46, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    For a U5 speedy delete, you should consult the deleter user talk:Spencer. To me it looks as if you trying to draft an article. You can use WP:DRV if you wish to take it further after that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    IEEE 1914.1

    I, StuartWhi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. StuartWhi (talk) 08:45, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    That page isn't deleted and never has been. ‑ Iridescent 09:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I have history merged the Draft:IEEE 1914.1 to the article, since it appears you did not write most of it! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:16, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Shotbow

    {{subst:refund|1= Shotbow |2= Shotbow Network was Minecraft's first "network" https://shotbow.net/presskit/, making use of new technology and APIs in 2012. They were featured at the Minecon event (offical Mojang event) panel, multiple times https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWTRfaiSG1E Similar size to Mineplex and Hypixel who both have their own Wiki articles. )} — Preceding unsigned comment added by NPCtom (talk • contribs) 10:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jamia Salafia (India)

    I, 43.245.122.28, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 43.245.122.28 (talk) 14:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:13, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Abhimanika K. Yadav

    I, Aamertheultimate, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aamertheultimate (talk) 15:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Michael Echols

    This page is of a public official in Louisiana. We were waiting on his election in order to make the page live. Since he was elected, he now needs the page up. —Johnrodrigo1980 (talk) 16:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Johnrodrigo1980, who is "we"? WP:SHAREDACCOUNTS are not allowed. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:48, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Guilin North Railway Station

    I, CaradhrasAiguo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CaradhrasAiguo (leave language) 19:06, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:10, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hugh Blumenfeld

    There exist news sources for the subject: [3] [4] [5] [6] —grendel|khan 21:36, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm

    I am Dr. Honey's research coordinator, and I believe that the Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm page should be considered for undeletion. Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm (HeLPS) is a disease, and is not original research. Seeing as Wikipedia contains information on the majority of human diseases, I believe that HeLPS should be able to have its own page on Wikipedia. As HeLPS was recently discovered in 2016, I believe that having its own page on Wikipedia will allow the disease to gain increased widespread recognition. HeLPS is often misdiagnosed as a psychiatric condition, therefore the majority of patients with HeLPS will never have the chance to have the surgery that is available for this disease. Having a platform on Wikipedia will potentially offer help to patients suffering from HeLPS who have been misdiagnosed to find the answers that they deserve, as more patients are turning to the internet for answers. The Wikipedia page is of course not a substitute for a neurological examination. However, it may help patients to discover what it is that they are truly suffering from.

    I believe that having a HeLPS page on Wikipedia allows for increased public awareness of the disease. Patients are often asking me as a research coordinator for an online source of information outlining their disease so that they themselves can have a better understanding of it. Wikipedia is an easily accessible venue for patients to reference, and it thus allows for further understanding and awareness of HeLPS and the impact that it may have on those affected. I believe that this page will be highly beneficial to those who are struggling to either find a diagnosis or to better understand their diagnosis.

    For the reasons outlined above, I am requesting for the Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm Wikipedia page to be nominated for undeletion. —Leahpoly (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. There must be some form of recognition before we can even entertain having an article on a topic, and diseases and disorders aren't any different. "Increas[ing] widespread recognition" is something we explicitly do not do. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Onward to 2020 22:02, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hemi-laryngopharyngeal spasm, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 22:04, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Chaudry Mohammad Aslam

    Soft deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaudry Mohammad Aslam. The subject played a crucial role in defining the borders of Pakistan, he is pictured with Chairman Mao Zedong at the conclusion of the Sino Pak treaty of 1965 in the famous book Shahabnama authored by Qudrutullah Shahab, he is also pictured in the December 1951 edition of National Geographic Magazine drawing the first maps of Pakistan"Publish changes" button below —Cancerspec (talk) 21:57, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    High Blumenfeld albums

    Hugh Blumenfeld has been recreated; this article was deleted because it was (temporarily) a redlink. —grendel|khan 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hugh Blumenfeld has been recreated; this article was deleted because it was (temporarily) a redlink. —grendel|khan 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hugh Blumenfeld has been recreated; this article was deleted because it was (temporarily) a redlink. —grendel|khan 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hugh Blumenfeld has been recreated; this article was deleted because it was (temporarily) a redlink. —grendel|khan 23:23, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    TechnoArt LIVE

    My Wikipedia page does not contain any violating words and does not hurt any wiki policy and please republish it —Socialterminals (talk) 02:34, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I see, I was looking at the userpage. See below. The page name was Draft:TechnoArt LIVE.

    Draft: Atlas (video game)

    Please restore as I intend to work on this (found few sources). —Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Lifoti Magazine

    I, Jarish9, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jarish9 (talk) 12:41, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Parable Fifteen

    I, Brycebreeds, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Brycebreeds (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:48, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Todos os llamáis Mohamed

    This page was deleted because it said the content was not of "relevancia enciclopédica," but there are many Wikipedia entries (even on Wikipedia.es) about movies or short films, so would argue that this page does meet the criteria for an encyclopedia entry. To find out more information, I also tried to speak with the administrator who deleted the article and blocked me, Taty2007, but even though it says I can still edit my own user page, I am not allowed and I am also not allowed to email the administrator. I would love to be able to speak with Taty2007 and have the article reviewed since I think it contributes valuable information about the short film Todos os llamáis Mohamed. —Tpoggi (talk) 16:22, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Tpoggi, I don't know what page you're referring to. There is no record of that page existing in mainspace or draft space, and you have no deleted contributions. Is this supposed to be for the Spanish-language Wikipedia? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    MuboshguIt is on wikipedia.es. is there a different forum where I could dispute the deletion for that? the issue would be that it seems that i've been blocked from editing a page or even my own page--essentially being able to dispute the deletion. Thank you! – Tpoggi (talk) 5:57, 28 April 2020 CT
    There was a page here: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todos_os_llam%C3%A1is_Mohamed . The deleter's talk page is here es:Usuaria discusión:Taty2007. We cannot assist you on English Wikipedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:54, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    RDH Architects

    Article seems to have been deleted in error —Elsalam01 (talk) 22:07, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    I am making this request in response to the reply I got for the same article. The reply stated that there were only three revisions undone, two from me and one from another user.This is incorrect, however, There were actually dozens of revisions undone, most of them by me, but also from multiple other users. It was an article I worked on for quite a while. Originally just going through and fixing minor issues I saw, but eventually I decided to start adding entities and removing improper entries as well. The article was reverted back to the state it was right before my first revision, around a month beforehand. I think what might be happening is because I’m one of the users who’s revision’s got undone, only I can see the deleted revisions in the history. But here are links to what I see.

    https://imgur.com/AfY6OmN.png

    https://imgur.com/HsSHgox.png

    https://imgur.com/J2eAhpL.png

    https://imgur.com/mjkZy9z.png

    https://imgur.com/m8rdRCm.png

    https://imgur.com/jh6Xtxv.png

    I’m asking for access to the highlighted version. The one which was lasted edited by Rodw. This access makes re-updating the article much easier. It’s essentially impossible to do without access. There were A LOT of changes, both large and small, which I made (most of which didn’t break the rule, but where undone in the reversion). That’s is why is extremely hard to re-update the page (property this time) without having acces a go the deleted version, —BorderRegions (talk) 23:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    These revisions were deleted because they mostly consisted of copyright violations. We don't restore those, especially not here. However it looks like almost all the content which was removed was added by you, so I'm very dubious about giving you access to the deleted version in case you reinstate the copyright violations. Hut 8.5 07:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Robust geometric computation

    G13; Google tells me this is a valid topic; e.g., [[7]] —Taku (talk) 23:25, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Anatoly Shirshov

    G13; note the corresponding Wikipedia article already exists but I don’t know if there is anything that can be merged from the draft (as I don’t have an access to the draft content) —Taku (talk) 23:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing

    G13; may or may not be notable (access to the content could help make the determination) —Taku (talk) 23:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Tom's Organization

    I originally prodded this as failing GNG/NORG. Further review of sources shows I was wrong and the topic is notable. Please undelete and interwiki to pl:Organizacja Toma. If there are any outstanding issues (unreferenced, etc.) I'll try to fix them shortly. —Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done @Piotrus: I've moved this to draft space at Draft:Tom's Organization, you said in your PROD that the cited source doesn't mention the subject so it sounds like it needs more references anyway. I'll let you decide what (if anything) to transwiki, the Polish article looks much better developed to me. Hut 8.5 07:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Interpretability of Machine Learning Models

    I, Cibiarjun, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cibiarjun (talk) 05:00, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Oronzo Persano

    I, FabioNogarotto, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FabioNogarotto (talk) 07:06, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. this has been restored several times before, future requests may not be accepted if it doesn't get improved. Hut 8.5 07:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Hoaxed

    As noted in the the deletion discussion, this page was essentially a mainspace copy-and-paste from a currently rejected draft at Draft:Hoaxed (2019 Film). I'm requesting undeletion and a history merge with Draft:Hoaxed (2019 Film) so that subsequent work isn't lost, in the hopes that more reliable sources can be found as the film ages. —Netoholic @ 12:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hoaxed, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Muboshgu: This is not true per WP:REFUND above which specifically says that this page can be used for this - This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft... This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you. The only slight complication is that I'm asking for a history merge because the draft was clearly the source for the mainspace page, and there were improvements made to it in its time there. -- Netoholic @ 20:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
     Done Spartaz Humbug! 05:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Netoholic, I was just coming back to as Spartaz if he'd do it. I'm no good at the history merges. Glad to see it's done. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Xentrifuge

    I, Greg.madro, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Greg.madro (talk) 13:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Superkombat Fighting Championship

    The article and the years 2011-2018 of this kickboxing promotion established by Eduard Irimia (World Promoter of the Year in 2011 and 2013 Medalist of Honor of the Italian Republic) were wrongly deleted because the first SUPERKOMBAT articles were created in the beginning of 2011. At that time some MMA users were deleting a lot of kickboxing, since then there were established some rules for all the combat sports. Following the dissolution of Europe's No 1 promotion It's Showtime, SUPERKOMBAT was considered the No 1 promotion on the continent and until the creation of Glory World No 1 for a short time. In the article it was even written that SUPERKOMBAT won in 2011 World Promotion of The Year in Kickboxing, in front of Ultimate Glory (future Glory and Europe's formerly No 1 It's Showtime). All the events used to be Eurosport broadcasts, highly popular show (then also on CBS Sports Newtork in the US). You can check on the article's multiple sources from the largest newspapers and the kickboxing sites! Furthemore, SUPERKOMBAT co-promoted with K-1 in their last big year (2012). SUPERKOMBAT promoted the next Glory champions and challengers such as Rico Verhoeven, Alex Pereira, Pavel Zhuravlev, Benjamin Adegbuyi, Errol Zimmerman, Mladen Brestovac, Yousri Belgaroui, Yoann Kongolo etc and K-1s Albert Kraus (K-1 WGP MAX Champion), Ismael Londt (runner-up), Hesdy Gerges, Bob Sapp, and many more ranked to the top 10 of the world - some even World's No 1 and even p4p No 1 like Verhoeven and Pereira. In 2011 the promotion was unknown and new, although many, many big K-1 and It's Showtime stars were joining it even then. Please correct this injustice! Superkombat is on Wikipedia Japan, Germany, France, Italy, Romania, Poland and Portugal. Many top Glory fighters were formed by SUPERKOMBAT and in the only kickboxing rankings available right now on CombatPress many are ex-SUPERKOMBAT fighters. If you decide to reinstate, please undelete it but also move the main page to Superkombat Fighting Championship instead of SUPERKOMBAT Fighting Championship. As per UFC. Some sources on that article which prove it was wrongly deleted: * TeessideLive: "Contender Promotions finalise deal with Romanian fight sport giants Superkombat" 1 * Daily Mirror announces a "partnership with European elite organisation SuperKombat" 2 * MMA Plus names a fighter "a veteran of world renown kickboxing shows such as GLORY and Superkombat" (GLORY being world no 1 kickboxing promotion, he puts Superkombat on the same level) 3 * Bloody Elbow names it "Superkombat is one of the biggest kickboxing organizations in the world" 4 * Libertatea publishing WIPI awards photos and results like Academy Awards in film (Andre Ward, Jose Suleiman of WBC boxing, Mike Tyson, Evander Holyfield receiving prizes, PLUS Superkombat for World's Best Kickboxing Promotion in 2011) Eduard Irimia a fost premiat alături de Mike Tyson şi Andre Ward * Superkombat Comănești Breaks European Attendance Record, The record setting attendance that garnered an astounding 34,000 people in Comănești * Superkombat was able to invest 5 million dollars only the development of youth "Superkombat starts new $5 million innovative model to develop young fighters" 7 * ANOTHER author from Bloody Elbow published dozens of articles about the TOP organisation Superkombat and its fight cards, schedule, news and results https://www.bloodyelbow.com/2013/4/17/4235446/superkombat-news-fight-cards-results-kickboxing Follow all the news on top kickboxing organization Superkombat, including fight cards, results, and more. * K-1 co-promoted with Superkombat in their last 2 golden years [K-1 Announces Agreement With SuperKombat K-1 Announces Agreement With SuperKombat] - agremeent announced from Los Angeles, in the K-1 finals most the heavyweights were coming from SuperKombat * From K-1 announcement: "Superkombat WGP is the industry leader in fight production throughout Europe. The company currently produces live combat sports events in 75 countries across four continents. Irimia and his team will work closely with K-1 in the format and production of its 2012 series of live arena events in America, Greece and Japan. SuperKombat WGP will also assist K-1 in securing the biggest and best new kickboxing talent coming out of Europe." * Eduard Irimia CEO Superkombat on Forbes cover in Romania for his running 50.000 tiraj şi copertă cu promotorul galelor Local Kombat * Evenimentul Zilei writes Superkombat will be broadcast in prime-time in the US and Canada on CBS Sports source * LARGEST SPANISH SPORTS NEWSPAPER announces Frank Muñoz became WGP champion in Superkombat Frank Muñoz, campeón mundial de Superkombat * Pages about Superkombat also in Gazeta Sporturilor number 1 sports newspaper of Romania [8] - THERE ARE OTHER 15 POORER KICKBOXING PROMOTIONS THAN SUPERKOMBAT WHICH WAS WORLD NO 1'S, THEN EUROPE'S NO 1 FOR YEARS, BUT NOT SUPERKOMBAT —.karellian-24 (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superkombat Fighting Championship, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:11, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you very much! I will try with this admin, but he is not very helpful so far or maybe he was busy. If not, I will request what you say. Have a nice day! —.karellian-24 (talk) 18:27, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Bahman Ansari

    Hello

    I created a page for Iranian writer, poet and researcher Bahman Ansari. He is an Iranian postmodernist writer. He has more than 15 books and scientific papers.

    You can see the link to see a list of some of his books: GoodReads.com

    in ResearchGate: ResearchGate

    And to see one of his books on Google Books: Google Books

    or Persian website like: دانلود کتاب

    Searching for his name in Persian: بهمن انصاری , you can see many photos and books of him.

    I created this page to appreciate this Iranian author and to acquaint non-Iranians with him. I first referred the article I wrote to Iranian news agencies. But the article was deleted. I wrote this article for the second time and this time I referred it to reputable sites like English Goodreads and Persian Goodreads, but again my article was deleted.

    Please retrieve the article and if there is a problem in referring to the resources, please guide me to solve them.

    Thank you B.sooshiant (talk) 20:17, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahman Ansari, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Kőszeghy Károly

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) KoszeghyLea (talk) 20:39, 29 April 2020 (UTC) Draft:Kőszeghy Károly[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Template:LaptopScreen

    I, ThisIsNotABetter, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 00:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Also, if you cam move this draft page to my personal namespace, can you create only the User:ThisIsNotABetter/Template:LaptopScreen page with these content? ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 00:02, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks! ThisIsNotABetter (talk) 13:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Chữ khoa đẩu

    "Chữ khoa đẩu" version by Xuyền is certainly a hoax, but this hoax is still circulating among many Vietnamese fundamentalist nationalists. This is exactly why there should be an article about it, including the arguments refuting it, in the first place. Beside that, there are some other speculations, though still debatable, about what chữ khoa đẩu mentioned in ancient documents really was. We just do not delete an article about a hoax just because that is a hoax. Greenknight dv (talk) 05:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC) —Greenknight dv (talk) 05:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Austrian Business Aviation Association

    I, Cuba98, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cuba98 (talk) 06:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    As the article exists in German language and the content is accurate I expect future publications to prove the validity of content —Cuba98 (talk) 06:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Adventure

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Atarian 13:14, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

    I should not be punished for kindnness and wanting to meet new people and make new friends

    If you are talking about User:D Rhindle, then we won't be restoring the call to join a club. Instead, based on your noble aspiration, you should be improving and writing some Wikipedia articles. Also I note that your signature does not match your user name, so you were harder to track down! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Robin Christopher

    Christopher's page was deleted by a prod nomination because there were no refs other than an IMDB link. The article should be restored because she meets WP:ENT for having significant roles on Soap Opera's; she played her popular role Skye Chandler for over a decade on three different shows All My Children, One Life to Live and General Hospital where she received two Daytime Emmy Award nominations (ref), as well as playing the role of Lorna Devon on Another World for three years. Christopher also has gotten WP:SIGCOV for her soap roles so her reinstated article could be easily well-sourced. A sampling of those. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 —GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 14:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Terissa Kelton

    I, 76.89.243.88, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.89.243.88 (talk) 19:39, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


    Their work as a producer is continually growing and more references are becoming available soon. —76.89.243.88 (talk) 19:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:22, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Phil Sokowicz

    I want to work on it using edit-request. —PhilS223 (talk) 21:18, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=954134656"