Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:55, 25 September 2020

This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here).

This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

Do not request that pages deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

Instructions for special cases:

G13. Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.
For JavaScript .js or .css pages, please request on the Wikipedia:Interface administrators' noticeboard.

Enter the page's title:

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Tristan Connelly

Tristan Connelly · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

I want to take the contents of the page and make it into a draft —HeinzMaster (talk) 05:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftified – the page has been restored to the draft space at Draft:Tristan Connelly. @HeinzMaster: It's time to get to work on these drafts you have requested! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett Most of these pages will reach notability in the next months (You need to reach some criteria to become MMA notable) so I can't post them now but it's good to have a template to work off when the time comes so I am not working from square one. Sorry I flooded yall with the requests at the same timeHeinzMaster (talk) 05:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vince Murdock

Vince Murdock · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I want to take the contents of the page and make it into a draft —HeinzMaster (talk) 05:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftified – the page has been restored to the draft space at Draft:Vince Murdock. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roe Green (disambiguation)

Roe Green (disambiguation) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

There are 4 uses of this term including 2 settlements linked at List of United Kingdom locations: Ri-Ror#Roa-Ror [1]. Also Sandon, Hertfordshire which was a red link then is now a blue link and mentions Roe Green. The 2 places in Hertfordshire were removed without explanation shortly before deletion without explanation presumably because the links were red but DAB pages can have red links as long as there is a blue link. —Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Crouch, Swale: I suggest that you write about those others. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:53, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Graeme Bartlett: thankyou I have added blue links for both of the red links, could you also restore the talk page please. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Banshi Bigha

Draft:Banshi Bigha · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, सीमा1, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. सीमा1 (talk) 05:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:22, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Nigger

The request has been declined. Mz7 (talk) 19:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Nigger · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Incorrect use of CSD. If deletion is wanted, the page should have been sent to RfD. See also User_talk:Drmies#Um_.... —–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 05:42, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose this per WP:NOTBURO and just on common sense. Leave the garbage in the garbage can where it belongs. John from Idegon (talk) 07:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page is designed for uncontroversial process; this page is not the proper forum for disputed speedy deletions, especially not ones for which many (most) administrators would object to undeletion and especially not ones which have an arguable basis for G10. See WP:DRVPURPOSE. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 07:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done You could talk to user:Writ Keeper about it. But also consider the CFD: Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 November 29# More from User:Clarenceville Trojan at the bottom. There does not appear to be any justification given to overturn the CFD by re-creation or undeletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:18, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should have been done per WP:G10 This is hideous. See you at WP:DRV. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What User:John from Idegon said. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:30, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to third the decline on this. I can't see where a category by this name would be beneficial even if you ignore that a category by this title is offensive and awful on so many levels. If this comes up on DRV, I'll endorse the deletion. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ReaderofthePack, L235, Deepfriedokra, and Graeme Bartlett:, ignoring why it was recreated in the first place, is there a way to prevent its use? Red link or not, it is still possible to use it in article space, no?--- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coffeeandcrumbs, you can watchlist the category and it will generate a watchlist entry whenever the category is added to any page. That's how I keep watch of these kind of things and I've already watchlisted this cat too. With a couple more regulars doing the same, it will be caught almost immediately. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:20, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I only asked because I have seen it used for attack before and deleted it. I never brought up this idea of preventing its use because of WP:BEANS. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 14:34, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The latest iteration was stopped by the edit filter. The edit filter was overridden at WP:AfC. Apparently, the edit filter allows the addition of the cat. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:47, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, it was stopped by the title blacklist, not the edit filter, which only works on page/account creations. Hence why it wouldn't stop anyone from adding a cat to an existing page. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:51, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Draft:Wendell Hanes

Draft:Wendell Hanes · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Lionelane, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lionelane (talk) 15:04, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Enslaved Families Remembrance and Personhood Restoration Day

Draft:Enslaved Families Remembrance and Personhood Restoration Day · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Harveyturney, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Harveyturney (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Harveyturney: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Mz7 (talk) 19:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jadgali language (disambiguation)

Jadgali language (disambiguation) was deleted per WP:G14 as a redirect that doesn't target a dab page. The trouble is that G14 does not apply if the target is a non-dab page that serves a disambiguation purpose. See also discussion on my talk page. I've contacted the deleting admin but they have not responded. – Uanfala (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've recreated a redirect at this title – it's got incoming links that I don't want to continue seeing broken, but the request still stands, as I would still like to see its history restored. No big deal if it doesn't get restored. – Uanfala (talk) 10:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page (disambiguation)

Also asking for Main Page (disambiguation) to be restored: it was deleted while still being discussed at RfD. I personally wouldn't think there should be anything wrong with holding an XfD discussion about a deleted page, but various well-meaning people keep coming and trying to procedurally close it. – Uanfala (talk) 21:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- For that Main Page (disambiguation), I don't think we need it for the discussion, as long as the discussion is not closed prematurely. If you want it to be a redirect, then argue that in the discussion. It was created twice as a joke. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - But the page is being discussed as a redirect: Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_11#Main_Page_(disambiguation). I don't know what its previously deleted content might have been, but its most recent incarnation, judging from the nomination, is an obviously non-joke redirect. Again, I don't mind if the link at the top of that discussion stays red, it's just that people keep trying to be helpful and close it: it happened twice in the space of a few hours: [2] [3]. – Uanfala (talk) 00:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, a part of me wants it to stay red, just so we can see how much more bizarre it can all get. – Uanfala (talk) 00:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Yes I think that discussion should stay open, the previous content was {{humor}} and then it was a redirect to Main Page. The first creation of it stated "Main Page is the most important page of a book." by Porgem and it was deleted 10 minutes after creation without reason given. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:31, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - So, the page did get recreated by a third editor, but three minutes later a fourth one procedurally closed the discussion again, though this time they apparently realised their error and re-opened it. – Uanfala (talk) 10:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Helen Lackaye

Draft:Helen Lackaye · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sharon Ply

Draft:Sharon Ply · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 182.74.219.222 (talk) 04:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sharon Ply · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 182.74.219.222 (talk) 04:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It is looking like an advertisement at present, so it needs a lot of work to make it like an encyclopedia article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Marina Toybina

Draft:Marina Toybina · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Heartfox, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Heartfox (talk) 04:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Heartfox: Some puffery also needs removing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:38, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Memory-unsafe programming languages

Category:Memory-unsafe programming languages · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The person that removed the page though that was a test edit. —Jcarlosmartins (talk) 09:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Jcarlosmartins: Please add articles to these categories Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

False pretenses. Where is the evidence that "The person that removed the page though that was a test edit"? The user has been told "Please do not rush with creating new programming-related categories, discuss them first at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing.[4] and agreed to do so.[5]

This is being discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing#I would like to create Category:Memory-unsafe programming languages and Category:Memory-safe programming languages --Guy Macon (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Materialscientist, Graeme Bartlett. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:14, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I updated discussion link above. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:28, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Memory-safe programming languages

Category:Memory-safe programming languages · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The person that removed the page though that was a test edit. —Jcarlosmartins (talk) 09:36, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

False pretenses. Where is the evidence that "The person that removed the page though that was a test edit"? The user has been told "Please do not rush with creating new programming-related categories, discuss them first at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing.[6] and agreed to do so.[7]

This is being discussed at #I would like to create Category:Memory-unsafe programming languages and Category:Memory-safe programming languages --Guy Macon (talk) 12:11, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ping Materialscientist, Graeme Bartlett. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted with "(G2: Test page)", I assume that the deleter logged their thoughts as the reason. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:25, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:D-Lithic

Draft:D-Lithic · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Derek Schmidt, request the undeletion of this draft submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 70.64.89.104 (talk) 10:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Uzabase

Draft:Uzabase · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 1.Ayana, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 🌸 1.Ayana 🌸 (talk) 11:29, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:TimeSlot

Draft:TimeSlot · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Arnielong101, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arnielong101 (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Arnielong101 currently, the draft has no inline citations at all. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:01, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chris Barrett (filmmaker)

Draft:Chris Barrett (filmmaker) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Jasonemrich, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jasonemrich (talk) 17:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. Jasonemrich this will take significant work adding reliable, independnet sources and removing promotional content. Please read Your First Article if you have not previously done so, as well as WP:NBIO. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Louis Armstrong's All Time Greatest Hits

Draft:Louis Armstrong's All Time Greatest Hits · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, LukeLovesEditing, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. luke loves editing (chat) 19:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. LukeLovesEditing This draft currently has no cited sources, and reads as rather promotional. It will need significant work before it can be approved. If you want help, feel free to ask on my talk page, or at the Teahouse. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:13, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Soil Conservation Authority: Victoria. Australia

Draft:Soil Conservation Authority: Victoria. Australia · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, CuriousElder, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I had not proceeded with the making of the initial draft as I had not understood the process, nor knew how to get back to the draft. Pardon! CuriousElder (talk) 20:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. CuriousElder It needs several additional source citations and additional content befiore it is ready for the main article space. If you want help or advice, please ask at [[[User talk:DESiegel|my talk page]] or at the Teahouse. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 23:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Risk.manager/Pleasure boat international travel formalites

User:Risk.manager/Pleasure boat international travel formalites · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to continue working on this if possible. Thanks —Risk.manager (talk) 00:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done: @Risk.manager and Robert McClenon: G'day, Risk manager, responding following the ping I received on User talk:Robert McClenon. Your draft was moved a couple of times from the original location you link to above; I have restored the draft's final location for you: Draft:Comparison of marine tourism laws. Good luck with improving the draft further. Welcome back to Wikipedia! Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 04:27, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elovay

Elovay · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I, Entla, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Entla (talk) 01:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elovay, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tails Skypatrol

Draft:Tails Skypatrol · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Namcokid47, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 02:13, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Red Phoenix ^talk 03:58, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bittrex

Bittrex · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Deleted from PROD. I've seen this article before and I would have removed the tag if I saw it. I will see what I can add to it. —Ҥ (talk) 03:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PotCoin

PotCoin · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

"Expired PROD, concern was: notability not established, all sources from launch or they are primary. just a one-time event, it is now discontinued and new sources will not appear"

Deletion rational is wrong. The following sources are not from launch nor are they primary.

"Dennis Rodman's North Korea trip is backed by a digital currency for weed" (CNN)

"PotCoin Says That Dennis Rodman Was Totally Behind The Release Of A US Prisoner" (BuzzFeed News)

"A cryptocurrency for marijuana is backing Dennis Rodman’s trip to Singapore" (Washington Post)

"What is potcoin? Marijuana cryptocurrency flies Dennis Rodman to Trump-Kim summit" (The Independent)

Also it's not discontinued and even if it was that doesn't mean new sources will never appear. —Ҥ (talk) 06:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Judo at the 2005 Jeux de la Francophonie

Draft:Judo at the 2005 Jeux de la Francophonie · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Sczipo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sczipo (talk) 08:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Omar, Kunar

Draft:Omar, Kunar · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

An article on an apparently notable topic. – Uanfala (talk) 10:35, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Uanfala: can you get hold of references for the topic? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I did a quick web check and there were results for a place in Afghanistan with this name. Just noting this was not an AfC submission, but an article that had existed for almost a decade before getting moved to draft and six months later getting deleted. – Uanfala (talk) 12:04, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Omar, Konar

Omar, Konar · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please also restore this redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 12:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo-popmatters.png

File:Logo-popmatters.png · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

To transfer to Commons after re-licensing —– Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done unlike the current visible logo, the hidden one is quite different, and would not be public domain. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Moncrief Park

Draft:Moncrief Park · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FloridaArmy: This has been restored twice before for you with no action. So what will you do with it if restored a third time? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:31, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's difficult for me t9 comment 9n an entry I can't see, but ex0anding and submitting or merging are certainly options. Coverage such as here show it's quite a notable and interesting subject. Why was the draft deleted? Seema misguided. We can do better. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FloridaArmy, the draft was delete because it wasn't edited for six months. Based on how often you're here, I'd think you'd be aware of that provision. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Houghton Townley

Draft:Houghton Townley · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Henry Sedley

Draft:Henry Sedley · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:RenRen070193/sandbox

User:RenRen070193/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, RenRen070193, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. RenRen070193 (talk) 04:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vaden Earle

Draft:Vaden Earle · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Lictor4, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Lictor4 (talk) 04:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pinnacle Industries

Draft:Pinnacle Industries · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Vmaske, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vmaske (talk) 05:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nitesh khare

User:Niteshkhare1/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Niteshkhare1 (talk) 10:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khumoyunmirzo Iminov

Khumoyunmirzo Iminov · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Football player made his fully-pro debut in Belarusian league, thus meeting NFOOTY. —BlameRuiner (talk) 12:00, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Salty Dog Cafe

Draft:The Salty Dog Cafe · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Saltydogmktg, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Saltydogmktg (talk) 12:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vinod Surana

Vinod Surana · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 106.51.0.67 (talk) 13:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:POOJYA SHRI PUNITACHARIJI MAHARAJ

Draft:POOJYA SHRI PUNITACHARIJI MAHARAJ · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Ansuthar, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ansuthar (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War

Saudi support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please refund a draft in my userspace, I want to work on the subject. —Pahlevun (talk) 15:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Pahlevun/Saudi support for Iraq during the Iran–Iraq War. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Front (company)

Draft:Front (company) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Heatheratfront, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Heatheratfront (talk) 16:40, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Milroy Goes, September 2020.jpg

File:Milroy Goes, September 2020.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

OTRS ticket from photographer is now available at Ticket:2020090410001893 —ww2censor (talk) 16:56, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done -FASTILY 22:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Flag of East Jerusalem

Draft:Flag of East Jerusalem · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A00:23C7:811C:6901:45F2:FF23:8C38:BA9C (talk) 18:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Ad Orientem (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Teji Johal

Draft:Teji Johal · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Vikiyord, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vikiyord (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tiffany S. Chism

Draft:Tiffany S. Chism · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Mhammond12, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it for improvements and resolve necessary issues.

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne

Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. —FocoCasti (talk) 22:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Austro-Hungarian throne, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Afghan throne

Line of succession to the former Afghan throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. —FocoCasti (talk) 22:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former Afghan throne, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Malcolmxl5 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Former throne of Dungarpur

Line of succession to the former throne of Dungarpur · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 22:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of Dungarpur, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Malcolmxl5 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FocoCasti, the only "outrage" that I see is your tone. Be WP:CIVIL. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mempool

Draft:Mempool · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Aseoconnor, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aseoconnor (talk) 23:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Aseoconnor: Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Power of 6

Draft:Power of 6 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

G13; we have power of 3, etc. So this may be notable. —Taku (talk) 00:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Taku: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!.--ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:12, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mareeg Media

Draft:Mareeg Media · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Joe-streatham, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joe-streatham (talk) 00:45, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Former monarchies

Template:Former monarchic orders of succession · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Rampur · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Rajpipla · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Iraqi throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Hyderabad · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Hanoverian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Jodhpur · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Waldeck and Pyrmont · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Idar · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Kutch · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Jammu and Kashmir · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Tunisian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Vadodara (Baroda) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Travancore · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Anhalt · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Hessian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Bharatpur · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Württemberg · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Georgian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Russian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former German throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Russian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Bavarian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Baden · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Bulgarian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Portuguese throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Iranian throne · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Egyptian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Brazilian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Albanian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Romanian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Saxon thrones · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Nepalese throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Italian throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former Greek throne · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Line of succession to the former throne of Bhopal · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

What the hell do you think you are to get rid of those articles about the disappeared monarchies worldwide? What does it matter if those monarchies were for X reason overthrown and can or cannot regain the throne of their respective countries? I respectfully ask you to have these items restored, at least for me they are important. And please do not get that argument out of the Wikipedia discussion and policies because that is only proving me right. What was done with these items is an arbitrariness, an outrage. —FocoCasti (talk) 03:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@FocoCasti: Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Line of succession to the former throne of Hyderabad, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Malcolmxl5 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

This is the wrong place for this, as has been stated earlier. REFUND is only for articles that have been deleted through avenues such as a proposed deletion. Articles like this, where they were deleted through deletion discussions where multiple people participated will never be restored through REFUND. To be very blunt, requesting restoration through this page is a waste of time because if an admin restored these articles via a REFUND request the articles would be quickly re-deleted and the restoring admin reprimanded. This is the wrong area. I will also be blunt in that if you are requesting restoration at deletion review (which is the right area) or via the deleting admin's page, it is better to ask politely. Being hostile will only greatly decrease the chances of the pages getting restored. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It actually looks like you've had a history of being warned for abusive language. Given this, along with warnings for unhelpful edits and a limited editing history, I'm just going to indef you and revoke talk page access, given that attempts by others to warn you and help has just been met with more abuse. You can request an unblock via the ticket system. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ReaderofthePack, indef was my exact thought when I saw this wall of copy-paste incivlity. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Axel Mansoor

Draft:Axel Mansoor · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bamooney7, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it and have significant changes that should make it eligible. Bamooney7 (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Bamooney7: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Eigopop

Draft:Eigopop · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Loggeson, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Loggeson (talk) 06:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:NoVNC

Draft:NoVNC · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Cendiosamuel, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cendiosamuel (talk) 11:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nazar Pankiv

Draft:Nazar Pankiv · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Nazarasvitlo, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nazarasvitlo (talk) 15:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:09, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Halleregina/sandbox

User:Halleregina/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Halleregina, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Halleregina (talk) 17:02, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lionel McColvin

Draft:Lionel McColvin · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Perseus25, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Perseus25 (talk) 03:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Perseus25: Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tanzania Tech

Draft:Tanzania Tech · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Amanijoseph87, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Amanijoseph87 (talk) 03:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Amanijoseph87: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rajasthan Royals Logo.svg

File:Rajasthan Royals Logo.svg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The file will be used on Rajasthan Royals. —CptViraj (talk) 04:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CptViraj: Done ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Slowdog

Slowdog · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Page was deleted without the creators defence. Subject is notable with credible references provided. Nominator may have done so for personal reasons. —DoctorNigeria (talk) 10:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DoctorNigeria: Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slowdog, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Sandstein (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I also want to note that when requesting undeletion, it is not really a good idea to claim that the nominator was doing so in WP:BADFAITH. Always assume good faith, at least at first, when it comes to other editors. In this situation what happened is that the article was nominated and ran for two weeks (typically it's one week), during which time no one came forward to provide an argument as to why the article was deleted. You were notified on your talk page of the deletion - it is up to you to keep on top of these notices. Pinging Sandstein in case they want to restore this to AfC. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the nominator was blocked for sockpuppetry so that does argue against good faith, but it's typically better to focus on notability when contesting deletion as that's going to be the crux of the matter: whether or not the article topic has received enough coverage in reliable sources to pass notability guidelines. If you can prove that, then most other arguments becomes somewhat of a moot point. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:27, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ReaderofthePack, thanks for the ping, but I don't undelete articles. Sandstein 10:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Dammers.jpg

File:Hans Dammers.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

File was deleted as F5 "Unused non-free media file" when article Hans Dammers was redirected, now restored and expanded so would be good to get image restored as well. Cheers —MisterBee1966 (talk) 12:00, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Hut 8.5 18:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Giles Duley at home 2020.jpg

File:Giles Duley at home 2020.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

OTRS ticket Ticket:2020082410006451 has been received —ww2censor (talk) 13:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Ww2censor: could you tag the image with the OTRS ticket please, I don't have OTRS access. Hut 8.5 18:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tea9

Draft:Tea9 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Itstea9, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Itstea9 (talk) 14:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 18:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Drabs

Draft:The Drabs · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Ssideff, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ssideff (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 18:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Drew Dosch

Drew Dosch · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleted by G7 in 2019, is notable because he has played in a major league game. This is an odd case because I am not the one who requested G7. Would this still be eligible for undeletion? —Ghinga7 (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ghinga7, sure. I'll draft-ify it. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at Draft:Drew Dosch. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jim Barfly/sandbox

User:Jim Barfly/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Jim Barfly, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jim Barfly (talk) 19:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Danny O'Flaherty

Draft:Danny O'Flaherty · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, GulfSouthScribe, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GulfSouthScribe (talk) 20:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Varley Roberts

Draft:John Varley Roberts · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Baker1952, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Baker1952 (talk) 20:45, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luthfur Rahman

Luthfur Rahman · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article deleted due to lack of notability, notability of the subject has since increased and there are now numerous reliable references available to add to the article —James Keir Hardie (talk) 00:06, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@James Keir Hardie: Done The original author that requested deletion is no longer active, so I'm going to treat this as if it's a proposed deletion. --ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The 100 (season 1)

Draft:The 100 (season 1) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Franar8, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Franar8 (talk) 04:03, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:08, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The 100 (season 4)

Draft:The 100 (season 4) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Franar8, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Franar8 (talk) 04:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 07:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The 100 (season 5)

Draft:The 100 (season 5) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Franar8, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Franar8 (talk) 04:05, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 07:51, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eileen Gunn bibliography

Eileen Gunn bibliography · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Juniperpaul, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Juniperpaul (talk) 04:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Juniperpaul: I've moved this to Draft:Eileen Gunn bibliography as it was marked as a draft going through the articles for creation process. Hut 8.5 07:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Margueritte Harmon Bro

Draft:Margueritte Harmon Bro · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, SL93, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I found sources in newspapers.com, with information about her and reviews of her books. I also have a physical copy of Who's Who in the Midwest book with an entry, an obituary, more reviews, and her contributions to school curriculums. SL93 (talk) 06:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 07:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nenad Njaradi

Draft:Nenad Njaradi · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Mmbtys, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mmbtys (talk) 10:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:42, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Beresnev Games

Draft:Beresnev Games · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Oxana Beresneva, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Oxana Beresneva (talk) 14:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:27, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Purnima Devi Barman

Draft:Purnima Devi Barman · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 22Hajdasz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 22Hajdasz (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Scruffs (video game)

Draft:The Scruffs (video game) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, EnterOnce, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. EnterOnce (talk) 16:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Pan American School of Bahia

Draft: Pan American School of Bahia · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, ThiagoWinters, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G11. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ThiagoWinters (talk) 13:48, 24 September 2020 (GMT -3)

Hey, my article was recently deleted due to "Unambiguous article". A moderator, or article reviewer, then proceeded to write a recommendation message of what to do. The article was not written by a person with a conflict of interest. The article was written by me. A citizen of the same city, with knowledge of the school. I request the undeletion or copying and paste the whole article into my Talk Page so I re-submit the article. I am a student at another school, in the same city. The last time I ever visited the school was in 2016, and I did it once. You can ask me for evidence that I do not go to school. In addition, you can definitely look me up anywhere. Reminder: It is not disallowed to write an article about an organization in the same city as you, as long as you are not biased or affiliated, and I am not.

I am not the school; This is obvious, I am not the school, I am a person. I do not work for the school; I have never worked for this school, or for anyone for the matter. I have never had any projects with the school, paid or unpaid. I do not represent the school; I am 16 years old. I do not represent the school, have never represented the school and I have never represented anyone. I am not related or directly or indirectly affiliated to any faculty or school representative; I am not related as a friend or a family member of any faculty of the school. If I was, I would be a student at that school by now, but I never attended that school. In addition, my username does not imply that I am from that school. In fact, when I created this Wikipedia account in 2014 I did not know that the school existed. My name is my real-life name.

It was deleted under G11 and G12. The G12 reasoning is incorrect because the "copyright infringement" was related to the article having the sections Mission, Vision Statement and Core Values. The sections were deleted, therefore there was no copyright infringement at the time of deletion

The article was not biased. I added sections such as Mission, Vision, Core Values, but then I deleted it and added "Activities". All information I added received its corresponding reference/source. All added information sections were inspired by existing articles such as The American School of London, Graded School/Associação Graduada (São Paulo), Pan American School of Porto Alegre and Pan American Christian Academy. All schools located in this country, with exception of The American School of London

I request you to un-do the page deletion or copy and paste the article so I can re-submit it.

Best Regards, —ThiagoWinters (talk) 16:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Wikipedia is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:29, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kamal Ghaffarian

{{subst:refund|1= Kam Ghaffarian |2= This was a draft that was mistakenly deleted before it could be published. I am happy to do whatever changes are required to maintain it, and hopefully to publish it in the near future. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.213.203.52 (talk) 16:58, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see no edit history at Kamal Ghaffarian or Draft:Kamal Ghaffarian. Did you misspell it? – Muboshgu (talk) 17:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It may have been Kam Ghaffarian, apologies. It was definitely a draft though.

Draft:Kam Ghaffarian exists. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:37, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

American Gothic

American Gothic · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This image of New American Gothic was incorrectly deleted claiming a copyright violation. As I indicated when I uploaded it, I painted the picture and I own the copyright —Gordon Bell 18:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Note This file was deleted from the commons not English Wikipedia. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:11, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There's also a question of self-promotion here - the editor has only edited Wikipedia in order to add their paintings to a couple of articles. It's not the worst case of self-promotion I've seen on here, but it's still a COI issue. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lallu

Lallu · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Article that I created and deleted without discussion due to sources, but now sources exist [8], [9], [10], [11], and [12]. TamilMirchi (talk) 21:47, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Deleted via WP:CSD#G7, which was requested by you. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shane Fennessey

Draft:Shane Fennessey · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Bmajeski, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bmajeski (talk) 22:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jenna Laine

Draft:Jenna Laine · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Dwightforrm, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it at least so I can save the draft elsewhere. Dwightforrm (talk) 22:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:10, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of civilisations in the Culture series

List of Civilizations in the Culture series · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I believe that this article functions within a less-academic subset of Wikipedia. There are many good articles on Wikipedia that compile fiction, such as this one, in a way to promote greater interest in said concepts. This is not an academic article, and it should be made known as such, but that does not remove the need for a general re-cap of the Culture novels for those interested in them. —Naboo64 (talk) 03:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Naboo64: I can't see where there has been an article by this title in the draftspace or on Wikipedia in general. I also didn't see any deleted articles or drafts in your edit history. If this deals with an existing article, you need to discuss this on the article's talk page or (if up at the Articles for Deletion process) on the deletion discussion page. If this deals with the removal of content on an existing article, you would need to discuss this on the article's talk page or on the talk page of the editor who removed the content. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, found it at List of civilisations in the Culture series. I'm going to tag the deleting admin (@Jo-Jo Eumerus:). It was deleted at AfD and they stated that you could ask for its restoration at REFUND, but I'm a little hesitant to restore this given that there looks to have been a relatively lengthy discussion. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It'd be best if they restored it, plus I'm a little leery that you're not addressing the notability issues brought up. --ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Naboo64: if you are happy to have this as a draft, or merging or exporting, then we can restore it as such. AFD is here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of civilisations in the Culture series Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I am thinking that the notability concerns need to be addressed prior to any restoration as an article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have never actually seen this article, so I could merely judge these concerns by the discussion board. The discussion board stated that there was a lack of citations, but that is why in my prompt I mentioned that there should be a flag given identifying that this is not an academic piece. I believe that an article in this vain would be beneficiary to general non-academic research upon this topic. Personal research is shunned, but I have seen many other lists like this with minimal sources for other fictional universes. It is not personal research, merely a different type of compilation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naboo64 (talk • contribs) 12:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Girdawary

Draft:Girdawary · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Sugeeth Jayaraj, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sugeeth Jayaraj (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. @Sugeeth Jayaraj: Please improve this with references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sean Si

Draft:Sean Si · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Zed Pascual, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zed Pascual (talk) 06:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Latrop Biometrics

Draft:Latrop Biometrics · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Chri3633, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chri3633 (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. @Chri3633: you can take out the promotional core values section! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Islamabad Capital Territory

Draft:Flag of Islamabad Capital Territory · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —89.28.170.89 (talk) 11:21, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa

Draft:Flag of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —89.28.170.89 (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Flag of Islamabad Capital Territory

Draft:Flag of Islamabad Capital Territory · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 89.28.170.89 (talk) 11:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is Already done ? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Gilgit–Baltistan

Draft:Flag of Gilgit–Baltistan · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —89.28.170.89 (talk) 11:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Actually see Draft:Flag of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Balochistan, Pakistan

Draft:Flag of Balochistan, Pakistan · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —89.28.170.89 (talk) 11:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:53, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Federally Administered Tribal Areas

Draft:Flag of Federally Administered Tribal Areas · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —89.28.170.89 (talk) 11:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find any file named like this. But there are deleted pages for Draft:Flag of Hyderabad State, Draft:Flag of Punjab, Pakistan and Draft:Flag of Junagadh State. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Flag of Punjab, Pakistan

Draft:Flag of Punjab, Pakistan · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, null, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 89.28.170.89 (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Flag of Punjab, Pakistan exists. —C.Fred (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sue Robins

Draft:Sue Robins · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Mike Waddingham, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 97.107.188.243 (talk) 14:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Roman Davidovich Timenchik

Draft:Roman Davidovich Timenchik · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Anna Balestrieri, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anna Balestrieri (talk) 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jerusalem School of Slavic studies

Draft:Jerusalem School of Slavic studies · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Anna Balestrieri, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Anna Balestrieri (talk) 16:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Punjab, Pakistan

Flag of Punjab, Pakistan · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2A00:23C7:811C:6901:7925:C1E4:F58D:E6BF (talk) 17:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This page has never been deleted. —C.Fred (talk) 17:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Hyderabad State

Draft:Flag of Hyderabad State · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —2A00:23C7:811C:6901:7925:C1E4:F58D:E6BF (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cân i Gymru 1991

Cân i Gymru 1991 · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I had accidentally pressed publish changes instead of Preview. I have now prepared a full page of information —Jonbonjela (talk) 17:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 880: / Line 880: @@
 *{{revisions|Draft:Flag of Hyderabad State}}
 Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —[[Special:Contributions/2A00:23C7:811C:6901:7925:C1E4:F58D:E6BF|2A00:23C7:811C:6901:7925:C1E4:F58D:E6BF]] ([[User talk:2A00:23C7:811C:6901:7925:C1E4:F58D:E6BF|talk]]) 17:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
+== Cân i Gymru 1991 ==
+*{{revisions|Cân i Gymru 1991}}
+I had accidentally pressed publish changes instead of Preview. I have now prepared a full page of information —[[User:Jonbonjela|Jonbonjela]] ([[User talk:Jonbonjela|talk]]) 17:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

v t e Noticeboards
Wikipedia's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General	Administrators Main Incidents Bots Bureaucrats Centralized discussion Closure requests Education Interface admins Main Page errors Open proxies VRT Oversight User permissions
Articles and content	Biographies of living persons Copyrights Questions on media Problems Dispute resolution External links Fringe theories Neutral point of view Original research Pending changes Reliable sources Resource requests Scalable vector graphics Spam Blacklist Whitelist Style Titleblacklist Translation
Page handling	History merges Mergers Splits Moves Protection Importation XfD Articles Redirects Categories Templates Files Miscellany Undeletion
User conduct	Conflict of interest Contributor copyright Edit warring and 3RR Sanctions Personal restrictions General sanctions Contentious topics Sockpuppets Usernames (Requests for comment) Vandalism
Other	Arbitration Committee noticeboard Requests Enforcement Edit filters Requested False positives Questions Help desk Teahouse Reference desk New articles Requests for comment Village pump Policy Technical Proposals Idea lab WMF Miscellaneous WikiProject proposals Discussions for discussion
Category:Wikipedia noticeboards