User talk:Alansohn: Difference between revisions
Bongomatic (talk | contribs) →A good one!: new section |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2,199: | Line 2,199: | ||
Requesting editor obviously inexperienced, now understands and accepts the situation so just an FYI as it was initially phrased with your name directly [[Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Abuse_by_.22Alansohn.22]]. best. [[User:Mfield|Mfield]] ([[User talk:Mfield|talk]]) 19:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC) |
Requesting editor obviously inexperienced, now understands and accepts the situation so just an FYI as it was initially phrased with your name directly [[Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Abuse_by_.22Alansohn.22]]. best. [[User:Mfield|Mfield]] ([[User talk:Mfield|talk]]) 19:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
:See reply there. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn#top|talk]]) 05:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
:See reply there. [[User:Alansohn|Alansohn]] ([[User talk:Alansohn#top|talk]]) 05:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Correct details == |
|||
The new sequal OVA of "Higurashi no naku koro ni" is titled "Higurashi no naku koro ni Rei" NOT "Higurashi no naku koro ni Chikai" the official site states it is titled "Rei", it is mentioned nowhere that it is called "Chikai". Also the OVA has now been released and in the Opening credits, the title song, sung by "Eiko Shimamiya" is listed as "Super scription of data" NOT "Chikai". Please revise your details and check more official sources next time before changing back to "Chikai" again. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Yekim|Yekim]] ([[User talk:Yekim|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yekim|contribs]]) 04:28, 2 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
== DYK for Stanley Dancer == |
== DYK for Stanley Dancer == |
Revision as of 07:57, 5 March 2009
Undoing revisions to Linux article
I left a clear edit summary as to why I made that edit. It was POV-pushing for Linux, and contained innacurate information. I noticed you have some anti-anonymous propaganda on your user page. Please don't allow your prejudism towards anonymous editors to drive your edit decisions. My edit had thought behind it, and if you had taken a second to read the edit summary, you would've seen that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.105.121.125 (talk) 22:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Erlang (programming language)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Erlang (programming language), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erlang (programming language). Thank you. Fikusfail (talk) 04:37, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/78/To_Commons.svg/50px-To_Commons.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading your media there instead. That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaK 07:28, 27 June 2008 (UT
Edits for Glenn Spencer
Please do not revert the edits back to the incorrect information again. If you have any questions, you can contact Mr Spencer personally at the number provided on the American Border Patrol website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.47.186.37 (talk) 17:07, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I stand behind my reversion of this edit, which described that "Glenn Spencer is an activist who is hated by the Southern Poverty Law Center." Alansohn (talk) 19:42, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Paul Kondratuk
I'm the user that keeps deleting the play house 22 section of the East Brunswick, NJ article. It was a relevant and necessary edit because I live in East Brunswick and the it's been announced that the project for rebuilding playhouse 22 has been stopped and the playhouse will no longer be an attraction to our town. So please do not block me for making important edits. If you have any questions or comments please email me @ paulkondratuk@hotmail.com. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.70.48 (talk • contribs)
RfA thank you
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/2c/Broom_icon.svg/75px-Broom_icon.svg.png)
— JGHowes talk - 19 August 2008
Paul Kondratuk is the biggest nerd on the whole web —Preceding unsigned comment added by W1k1p3d1a n3rd (talk • contribs) 17:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey
Don't revert things before i do. --J. Comb (talk) 21:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC) Vadislism is cool drop dead or be dead —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.114.31.86 (talk) 05:08, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Jeff Behar
I didnt know how to email you, for the information about Jeff behar and hillsborogh
Professional bodybuilders | Mister-olympia, see: http://mister-olympia.bganzeige.de/professional-bodybuilders
also see:
http://botw.org/top/Sports/Strength_Sports/Bodybuilding/Personal_Page/
You can also just google him, jeff behar writer, jeff behar bodybuilder, jeff Behar NASA, jeff Behar ceo of Musclemagfitness.com
He graduated from hillsboro, 1983.
U can also see him on TV, on comedy central by googling his name and comedy central or going here:
http://www.comedycentral.com/videos/index.jhtml?videoId=70301&title=golds-gym
U can also confirm by checking the hillsboro area at classmates.com
Sorry for having to wroite in here. I did not know how else to email you back with the information you requested.
December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to World government has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.
Fuck you! read the bloody message. this is not to cite your own info. source it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jor Monn (talk • contribs)
Thank you for reverting the profane vandalism made to my userpage!
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Smiley.svg/62px-Smiley.svg.png)
IRP ☎ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Re: Derek Thompson (sports commentator)
I have recieved a messege from you about editing Derek Thompson (sports commentator), I have never heard of this man, nor have I ever edited his article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.91.20 (talk) 18:56, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Joseph Kahn (shipping executive)
Number 298 (185 create/expand - 113 nominations)
DYK for Howard Pack
Number 299 (186 create/expand - 113 nominations)
wpnj members
What do you think of this? shirulashem (talk) 15:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Replied there. Alansohn (talk) 15:34, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Do you realize wiki-edit power is a paradox - one that no one interest it power, wants! You will never be freed of your ignorance - pitty be unto you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.251.68.7 (talk) 05:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
coordinators for wpnj?
what do you think of this for wpnj? shirulashem (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I guess I have been a de facto coordinator, but there's no downside to having multiple people involved. Alansohn (talk) 17:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- correct. you have been the de facto coordinator. i'm basically trying to accomplish two things: 1- make it easier for newcomers to the project to know who to contact and 2- more importantly, as per the wikiproject guide, give some people responsibility for the administrative tasks involved in maintaining and growing the project. i know i'm new to the project so i hope i'm not speaking "out of turn" it's just that i'm eager to see the project grow. depending on how you feel, i'd like to put the following up on the project's talk page for consideration:
To coordinate the "inner workings" of our WikiProject, I propose the implementation of a coordinator department to be responsible for the maintenance tasks of the WikiProject. Therefore, the proposal is as follows:
|
- We have accomplished a tremendous amount with WPNJ even if things aren't hopping, but I agree that a re-evaluation of our progress can help fill in even more. We've filled in articles for every (or nearly every) municipality, state and federal legislator, school district, public high school, etc. Your efforts on evaluating articles has been a tremendous help. My only suggested change might be to invite any other WPNJ members who might be interested in serving as coordinators, on a more the merrier basis. Please let me know what we can do to reignite WPNJ. Alansohn (talk) 02:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- I like your suggestion and I've made some changes above. What do you think? shirulashem (talk) 13:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- We have accomplished a tremendous amount with WPNJ even if things aren't hopping, but I agree that a re-evaluation of our progress can help fill in even more. We've filled in articles for every (or nearly every) municipality, state and federal legislator, school district, public high school, etc. Your efforts on evaluating articles has been a tremendous help. My only suggested change might be to invite any other WPNJ members who might be interested in serving as coordinators, on a more the merrier basis. Please let me know what we can do to reignite WPNJ. Alansohn (talk) 02:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Oliver Lundquist
Bizarrely, you and Wehwalt (talk · contribs) seem to have written two different articles on the same person, within two hours of each other. They should probably be merged, but I'm not sure which way around - I just thought I'd alert you to it! Shimgray | talk | 20:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have merged the two articles and the two DYK proposals, which were also separated by two hours. I kept mostly your version in both cases, and simply made the DYK for joint credit, if that's OK.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:19, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the initiative. Alansohn (talk) 02:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Obvious solution.--Wehwalt (talk) 02:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Steganography
Greetings. I think removing apparently garbage sections is not destructive, however I explained my reasons on the talk page. If there's a mark for deletion instead of simply erasing a section, please let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.98.218.173 (talk) 22:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
- I apologize for missing your talk page comments. Please understand that seeing an IP editor removing major sections of an article without explanation in the edit summary can appear to be vandalism. Making sure that edits include a clear and concise edit summary will help other editors better understand your actions. Please excuse the error. Alansohn (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Alvah Chapman, Jr.
Number 308 (193 create/expand - 115 nominations)
» \ / (⁂ | ※) 00:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Esix Snead
Number 309 (193 create/expand - 116 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 09:34, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Drew Pickles
It's silly, but true. I provided sources of why it's notable but you removed it saying it was vandalism. The most popular video on youtube about Drew has 95,658 views. Iamthegrant (talk) 15:33, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- The question is if the material is encyclopedic even if "true". The other question is that the interpretation is your synthesis based on your original research, and is not based on reliable and verifiable sources on his status as a gay icon. Alansohn (talk) 15:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just watch a video, he always says "Hello my name is Drew Pickles and I am really really gay" made by several other people. He is not gay in Rugrats, but on the internet, he is. Iamthegrant (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to GWTV has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry about that! Evil Shepreth Monkey (talk) 16:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Miley Cyrus discography has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 16:29, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Unconstuctive? Well, these types of albums should be listed separately by their own types per Article-wide, so we can not add them all in one section. I think you should review what you reverted because you made a mistake. Sparks Fly 16:37, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- My apologies for the warning, which has been removed. The warning was an accident, and in trying to remove the message and undo the removal of content, my browser crashed. When I got back in, I forgot to undo the revert and the warning. Please accept the apologies for my clear error. Alansohn (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Of course I do, do not worry, these things always happen, so take more care in the coming times. Sparks Fly 17:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- My apologies for the warning, which has been removed. The warning was an accident, and in trying to remove the message and undo the removal of content, my browser crashed. When I got back in, I forgot to undo the revert and the warning. Please accept the apologies for my clear error. Alansohn (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your help at Brain fog today. The newbie editor has (finally) found the article's talk page, but so far we're still at the stage of accusing all his opponents of being paid to suppress information. I'm hoping for some progress... and in the meantime, I sincerely appreciate your reversion of his nonsense today. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- I was just trying to make heads or tails and figure out what was going on. Glad I could help. Alansohn (talk) 20:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Vandals and crap
For what it is worth to you, whenever I see that you've made a reversion on a page that I monitor, I have found I need not bother checking the page. Thanks for your efforts in patrolling these pages, and moreso, keeping the inane song and Simpsons/South Park references out of pop culture/media portrayal sections in biographies. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:38, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind note. It's amazing how seeing vandalism on an article just degrades the entire content of the page. I do make mistakes, and I have more than a handful of apologies that I have issued, but I do try to make sure that a revert takes care of all of the vandalism, not just the latest crap. Thanks again for the kinds words. Alansohn (talk) 21:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
- It's appreciated. I know that a Wiki-friend who does anti-vandalism work is frequently targeted herself, mostly by IPs that take exception to her changes. It's too often thankless work. I wanted you to know that I noticed that your name pops up on my watchlist quite often, but is one of the happy few that I'm glad to see there. Keep up the good work. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:21, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Happy Alansohn's Day!
![]() |
Alansohn has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, |
- We go by UTC time here, remember? That means there are 21 hours, 41 minutes until your day is up. bibliomaniac15 02:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- Now I have all Wednesday to celebrate! Thanks again. Alansohn (talk) 02:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Caitlin Sanchez
Number 310 (194 create/expand - 116 nominations)
» \ / (⁂ | ※) 02:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Dorothy Sarnoff
Number 311 (195 create/expand - 116 nominations)
» \ / (⁂ | ※) 02:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
NJSIAA athletic conferences?
I was just wondering if you know of any more NJSIAA conferences besides the ones listed in "Category:New Jersey high school athletic conferences"? If you take a look at the NJSIAA Wikipedia page, go to the bottom and check out all the navboxes I've created over the past week. I'd like to account for ALL New Jersey high schools, including the ones independent of NJSIAA jurisdiction (e.g. St. Benedict's) but I don't know of any other conferences. Could you help me out if you ge tthe chance? Thanks. -Jrcla2 (talk)(contribs) 04:51, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination
Thanks. Considering that the Steelmark article just went up today, it looks like it has been up for a while. Pretty good job. So where would I nominate it at? I'd like to return the favor. Thanks!Jgera5 (talk) 05:26, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Oliver Lincoln Lundquist
Number 312 (196 create/expand - 116 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 09:12, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Donal McLaughlin
Number 313 (197 create/expand - 116 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 09:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Re: Economy of India
Have you gone through the edit? Just because I chose not to have an account, you assume my edit to be a vandalism?! Pity.. --67.180.5.41 (talk) 23:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
- See response on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 22:25, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Added Prod tag to rather excessively complimentary article on a non-notable person. You have edited on it, so I am sending this to you. Thanks! Collect (talk) 12:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Am I missing something?
Why was this edit reverted. It fits right in with the rest of that mess disguised as discussion. --Onorem♠Dil 20:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note on the IPs talk. I figured it was unintentional, but wanted to make sure I wasn't missing some hidden meaning in his comments. --Onorem♠Dil 20:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notification. I was mortified to see that I had deleted someone's rather genuine comments. Alansohn (talk) 00:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Fruity
why did you change fruity >=( fruity is a word
Chronic fatigue syndrome is doomed
I'm done trying to build consensus with that entry --- there are editors with strong narrow POV who do not know the literature and they intend to keep their empire. Example: I attempted to build consensus on who are experts, using the MD's and researchers from the CDC as a starting point, as well as textbooks (Books targeted for clincial use), and they delete without discussion this material. For well known and published articles they deem them to be "unreliable" although the CDC uses the same articles in the same journals...
I trust someone will escalate this issue to someone that can do something. Is there a place to registered complaints against a crew such as this?
- Lassesen (talk) 02:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have looked at the article and you are justified in your concerns. Using WP:3O is a good way to start the process of getting some outside input. I understand your frustration, and I've seen far worse, but getting outside input will help. Please let me know if I can help with anything else. Alansohn (talk) 02:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- With respect Alansohn why is Lassesen justified in calling me and other editors unknowledgeable, with an "empire" and all of other attacks he makes on us here and on talk pages, like saying people that do not agree on him have a pro psychological POV? I do not have any relation on CFS, I am not a patient a doctor and I do not even like psychology! Lassesen tho is a well-known internet activist, he said so on his talk, who opposes proven treatments for CFS and promotes alternative medicine remedies. That is great, I think it is good he is so active and i respect him and his views, but it is not how we write medical articles at WP, it is not a place for activism and experimental research.
- Chronic fatigue syndrome is a medical article, it should be most based from peer review secondary sources in major journals. I have tried explain this. Self published books and obscure primary sources from journals which do not exist any more are not best sources for medical articles.
- I am thinking, Lassesen has alot of knowledge and alot to say on CFS, but i am hoping, he will try and learn more about Wikipedia guidelines and not be so confrontationing. Some times I am not so polite like I should be, I am working on myself, but I am also just trying, follow WP guidelines. Thx, RetroS1mone talk 05:24, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have looked at the article and you are justified in your concerns. Using WP:3O is a good way to start the process of getting some outside input. I understand your frustration, and I've seen far worse, but getting outside input will help. Please let me know if I can help with anything else. Alansohn (talk) 02:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you so much for all your help in reverting vandalism on Go Man Go while it was on the main page. Ealdgyth - Talk 00:04, 8 January 2009 (UTC) |
- Thanks for the recognition, but its a shame that an article like this had to go through so much blatant abuse. Alansohn (talk) 00:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- All part of the main page fun. I knew it would attract some "extra" fun since it has the word "stud" in it... Ealdgyth - Talk 00:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Hell, My addition to Cherlottetown Rural Highschool:
The annual hackey sac competition is very well received from the raiders. They hack using a "Raider Sac." This sport can be very brutal and has resulted in 5 injuries in the past 7 tournaments. The raiders often challenge students of Colonel Gray High School to participate. The Rural and Gray has had a long rivalry and Raiders often refer to it as "The Gay." This is shown as disrespectful. (True)
IS TRUE! Why are you removing it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ARuralRaider (talk • contribs) 01:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please see this page. Wikipedia is about "verifiability" not "truth". You'll need independent, reliable sources. Useight (talk) 01:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism or Plagiarism?
You need to read edits before you revert them and yell at the editor. I deleted plagiarism, which is clearly against Wikipedia policy, and you not only reverted the edit but left a message on my page scolding me. Please pay more attention next time before you create more work for those who are trying to improve Wikipedia. 67.211.130.184 (talk) 03:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
- See reply at user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 14:09, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Project Congress
As a participant of WikiProject U.S. Congress, please consider placing {{Project Congress to do}} to the top of your User_talk page. Thank you. —Markles 16:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
British International School of New York
Hi, we are trying to correct the title of this article to reflect the proper title of this institution, which is 'The British International School of New York'. However, between the bot and yourself it has been reverted and marked as vandalised. Please advise what we need to do. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nylonuser28 (talk • contribs)
- See reply at user talk page regarding move issues and use of "The". Alansohn (talk) 14:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Vincent Ford
Number 314 (198 create/expand - 116 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 05:52, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Agree with dumping poop section on your user page
It seems like it wouldn't be hard to create a tool reverting any edit using "poop" from an anonymous IP. (And add to that "penis", "gay", "fuck" -- where the word isn't otherwise already used in article.)
I created the anti-vandalism "Piano non troppo" account to save my serious work from vindictive vandals. I discovered that I enjoyed the anti-vandalism process. In fact, it made me feel more a part of the community. My other accounts, with hundreds of hours of painstaking work, got no barnstars. The rate at which those accounts have edits reverted is ten times as high as Piano non troppo's. Apparently other editors recognize my "worth" in part by what other community service I've done. Or perhaps what other edits they can readily evaluate. So, strangely, the anti-vandalism patrol has had unanticipated positive consequences for me. And, maybe, somehow (I see Wikipedia as a social experiment) society is indicating what about my work it values. Less my expertise, than my social participation. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 09:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
delta lodge edit
I have provided a neutral and factually backed addendum to the delta lodge page..... However i find my slef under due arrest. It seems every time i edit i get deleted, i just feel that if your going to provide a nuetral and objective explanation of the subject you should include all facts, as i have and provded sources. I also concur wi the sentiment that the delta lodge subject matter is not notable seing as how they are a defunct organization (not in good standing at the university of north texas... this organization is not mandated by any governing body. The statement that they are a "fraternity in good standing at the university of north texas is fraudulent. They posses no charter/mandate; they hold sparse residence at best, and were relocated by the city due to alarming concerns. To reiterate i fing the delta lodge page to be an apologists rendition with not factual evidence to back it up... it contains claims that are unfound and jingoistic at best. If one is to present subject matter with the confines of an encylopedic medium, one would hope that all facts are heralded not just the self promoting smarmy dialoge of advertisers —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeltaLodgeDown (talk • contribs) 21:58, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
The Unborn (film) edit
My edit to this page did not constitute vandalism. Clear shots of a camel toe in a PG-13 movie can be considered objectionable. If you are going to take pride in your monitoring of these pages, please provide some insight as to why an edit is not acceptable. I will now revert the page, with an added citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.63.149 (talk) 00:50, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- In Wikipedia, claims require reliable and verifiable sources. Without sources supporting your claims they were removed. If you can find a reliable source that supports the claim that a cameltoe is clearly visible and is objectionable in a PG-13 film, I will have no objection. Without such a source, it will be removed again. Alansohn (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
use of rollback
You rolled back this edit but it was not vandalism. The cited source indeed supports and carries the term Zionist hence the edit was clearly meant to be in good faith, however PoV or clumsily worded. Please take this as a friendly reminder to only use rollback on vandalism (you should have either used undo, or done what you wanted through an edit window). Thanks and all the best. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:06, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. While I thought I had read the original content in its entirety, the use of the inflammatory term "Zionist enterprise", even though the words were located in the original article, appeared to have been deliberately taken out of context and misused. I appreciate your concern about this edit, and its totality appears to have been made in good faith. Alansohn (talk) 03:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Sourced, good faith edits can indeed come off as untowards and nettlesome to some readers, which is one reason why rollback is so straightforwardly meant only for vandalism. Thanks for your understanding. Gwen Gale (talk) 03:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Véronique Cloutier
You keep on deleting a very interesting comment about the Bye Bye. Please stop doing this and get a life, asshole. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.69.255.41 (talk • contribs)
- The comment is interesting, but unsourced. Alansohn (talk) 05:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
restored to prevandalism version. Dlohcierekim 04:01, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. I was baffled by the new improved version of the article. Alansohn (talk) 05:15, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for watching my back when the vandals bite back by trashing my user page. Cheers! See you in the trenches... Geoff T C 13:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Always a pleasure to help a fellow Wikipedian. Alansohn (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
changing IP vandal
Alansohn you piece of shit, get a life, instead of shitting up wikipedia asshole. Go get a job and PLLEEEASSEE get a life. You motherfucking nigger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.234.113 (talk • contribs)
- Fuck you alansohn. Ill change my IP Adress you fucking gay son of a bitch, suck your boyfriends cock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.234.113 (talk • contribs)
- What is truly amazing is how angry a vandal can possibly get that his vandalism has been removed. If only we good faith Wikipedia editors could get a small fraction as angry about vandals who are "shitting up wikipedia" and started creating a solution to the problem rather than having us waste hours dealing with vandals like this one. Alansohn (talk) 21:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
And I'll be more than happy to protect your user page if he dose. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 21:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the offer. I think I'll be OK. Alansohn (talk) 21:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Emmanuel de Mérode
I urge you to study independent (!!) material about Emmanuel de Mérode, make your mind and act accordingly. All what happens in Kivu stinks starting by the death of Dian Fossey. Greed and arrogance. Avoid any material of National Geographic which TV channel is mostly owned by Fox.
Some people are risking their life to help civilian populations in the park of Virungas, while Emmanuel is apparently safely editing his bio from Nairobi. You should not let Emmanuel de Mérode writing his own bio. Everything in it must be proved. Due to my viligance, it has been reduced to very little because most of it was pretentious or unubtantiated. Please study the history of the article. Please suppress the mention of training as an anthropologist until more precision is given. 82.67.232.89 (talk) 22:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Gurumayi Chidvilasananda
Also, you seem to know the ropes within the wikipedia. I submit you another case, theringess is again and again suppressing any independent material about Gurumayi Chidvilasananda including the transcriptiion of an article of the new yorker. Please study the history of the article. 82.67.232.89 (talk)
You can join me at cognominal@gmail.com
You're invited!
![]() |
New York City Meetup
|
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, look at our approval by the Chapters Committee, develop ideas for chapter projects at museums and libraries throughout our region, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the November meeting's minutes and the December mini-meetup's minutes).
We'll make preparations for our exciting museum photography Wikipedia Loves Art! February bonanza (on Flickr, on Facebook) with Shelley from the Brooklyn Museum and Alex from the Metropolitan Museum of Art.
We'll also be collecting folks to join our little Wikipedia Takes the Subway adventure which will be held the day after the meeting.
In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:35, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Cajunradio
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Cajun accordion. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. Chasingsol(talk) 03:15, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Baton Rouge Cajun Zydeco Schedule cajunradio - STOP DELETING MY LINK !!!!
Why are you objecting to me adding cajun music schedules to cajun music? It is related and appropriate. It is not promotion. If you would look at it, it is a non-profit website strictly preserving cajun culture and cajun music which is directly related to the cajun music. Everyone in Louisiana recognizes that www.cajunradio.org is a cajun community resource and not a personal website. Just because it it maintained by Clarence does not make it a personal website. Please review content of links that you delete prior to deleting them! Cajunradio (talk) 04:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- The website in question is largely promotional and adds little to the articles in question. While it is vaguely relevant on some of the articles, in articles such as History of Cajun music the links add absolutely nothing. The pattern of your edits, which seem to add links exclusively to articles related to businesses promoted on the website in question, adds further concerns that WP:EL is being violated. Alansohn (talk) 04:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of Chief Paul D. Lilly article
Dear Sir or Madam,
I am E. Williams, the firm representing Chief Paul D. Lilly of Texas. We were hired by the Chief to create a Wikipedia Page for him, as he is overwhelmed with requests for information and his background within the Community Policing Field. However, you deleted his page a few hours ago, under the assertion that he was not a "notable" man. The contents of the page are his intellectual property and you are hereby given notice that you must restore the page and its information with 72 hours, or you may be held liable under both USC and International Intellectual Property Laws. Further, because of your actions, a Google search now produces his name and a page that states his profile was removed because you did not feel that he was a notable person. This statement and the posting of such a "flag", constitutes Defamation of Character, and because it is in written form in a public Doman, it also constitutes Slander under both United States and International law (case law and codified statutes).
I will allow you 72 hours to rectify this issue without a demand for compensation for my client's deleted intellectual property. Otherwise my firm will most certainly take appropriate action both against you, and against Wikipedia itself for allowing your actions. If necessary, we will apply for subpoenas to compel Wikipedia to provide your name and complete personal identifiers for appropriate court enforcement action.
Most Respectfully,
E. Williams Firm, LLC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paullillyusa (talk • contribs)
- I am most intrigued by the notion that the E. Williams Firm was "hired by the Chief to create a Wikipedia Page" for Chief Paul D. Lilly of Texas and is now demanding that it be recreated. I'm not sure why a firm that has so little understanding of Wikipedia policy and of the [GNU Free Documentation License]] under which all content is turned over for other readers to copy and edit. It's a shame to have to wait a whole 72 hours to see the legal fireworks that will take place when absolutely nothing occurs in response to these demands. Alansohn (talk) 04:54, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Paullillyusa making legal threat to protest deleted contribution of non-notable person
Thank you very much for reverting this user's vandalism against my user page. I have also reported to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents as I suppose a violation of Wikipedia:No legal threats against my talk page.--Jusjih (talk) 05:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Adding a image to my user page
Hi Alansohn! Happy New Year! I was just wondering how I could add another image or picture from another website to my user page. Could you please help me? Thanks!Neptunekh (talk) 05:55, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
the note at the top of your user page
hi i'm not sure how else to leave you a comment. I am a teacher who has assigned the book "the Winter King" to my freshman students. They have a test tomorrow morning on it so to catch who didn't read and instead relied on Wiki to "read" it I played around with some of the details. Another administator emailed me and promised to leave it as is until tomorrow morning when he/she will revert it back to its originial content, which I had also planned on doing once the test was given. I realize alot of activity has been made on that page today (most likely the work of my freshman boys who know alot of their friends will be reading it tonight) but please leave the changes that "make sense" for now. I promise it will be fixed in the morning. Thanks (originally left at 23:31, 8 January 2009) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.225.189.242 (talk • contribs)
- Please see a message I left for the ed. who deliberately introduced false information into that article, at User talk:76.225.189.242. I invite your comments there. I am not sure how to proceed, and whether publicity is appropriate. DGG (talk) 07:08, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I have replied on the talk page there. Alansohn (talk) 15:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for William Glendon
Number 315 (199 create/expand - 116 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 14:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism reverted incorrectly
The following edit to the Serendipity page:
Reverted edits by 66.230.32.149 to last version by 76.201.16.132 (HG)
Actually reverted a correction of the vandalism. User 66.230.32.149 corrected the vandalism. I will allow you to make the necessary changes --192.43.65.245 (talk) 17:33, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- I could have sworn I picked the correct version to revert back to. I must have serendipitously selected the wrong version. The correct version has been restored. Alansohn (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Lloyd Ohlin at DYK
I've made a suggestion regarding the hook. Please comment as soon as you can, to avoid this article being passed over. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 18:00, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Replied there with two alternate versions. Thanks for the feedback. Alansohn (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your prompt response. I've selected the 1st version (the longer one was somewhat over the length guide). Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 20:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Wow wtf
Wow what the hell man calling my edit vandalism when all I do is rewrite a sentence Wartortle28 (talk) 18:31, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. Please make constructive changes in the future. Alansohn (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- That was a constructive change! You tell me how it's vandalism, or admit you're wrong and remove that warning.Wartortle28 (talk) 18:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Your are referring to this edit in which you changed "At the 1999 census, the population was 683." to "A 1999 consensus logged the area with a population of 683." When making constructive edits in the future, please be careful to use an edit summary to explain the purpose of your edits. Alansohn (talk) 18:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes thank you that is what I am referring to, and as you can clearly see since you just pasted it here, it was not vandalism and it's unfair that I have 2 warnings when I didn't do anything wrong. Wartortle28 (talk) 18:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Omg I just realized I changed census to consensus thanks to that guy on my page, dang even though I went over the edit I didn't notice I incorrectly changed the word. My bad sorry Wartortle28 (talk) 18:49, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Your are referring to this edit in which you changed "At the 1999 census, the population was 683." to "A 1999 consensus logged the area with a population of 683." When making constructive edits in the future, please be careful to use an edit summary to explain the purpose of your edits. Alansohn (talk) 18:37, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- That was a constructive change! You tell me how it's vandalism, or admit you're wrong and remove that warning.Wartortle28 (talk) 18:34, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Frank Prewitt
"It appears the author of the "Frank Prewitt" page is no other than J. Frank Prewitt himself. He is an individual with at least a 15-year history of questionable behavior who has admitted on the stand during a federal trial of one of the criminal defendants that he committed illegal acts. He claims that he did not become a government informant under pressure, but instead acted as a good citizen. Little exists to substantiate that claim. In an extraordinary act of self-justification, he authored a poorly written book to exonerate himself and recast himself as the hero of the whole affair. As part of his page, the book jacket, both cover and promotional text, are included.
I have made attempts to correct his page to reflect reality, but he has it on a watch list and amends each correction to again promote himself." - ACTIVIST (editor)
ALANSOHN: It appears you are well versed in Wikipedia jargon, rules, rights, privileges, and writing. As a fellow user, thank you for your contributions! Two things for you. First, I am not "Frank Prewitt". I do have a spine, and if I was, I would say I was, and not have to deal with the inequities of activist and his/her or its constant barrage of unsubstantiated claims. Like you, I want a fair and true article. Despite my abilities or inabilities according to activist to write such I have really given up. Obviously activist has some type of vendetta against Frank Prewitt. He/she or it continues to subtly change wording to honestly discredit anything and everything I edit. If he or she is so angry they should just call Prewitt (listed in the Anchorage, Alaska phone book)and tell them there feelings instead of blatantly editing in a liable fashion.I have made the section as unbiased as possible given the left leaning opinions of ADN (Anchorage Daily News). In reality the section has all be references and has edited by experienced editors and contributors like yourself, so I see no need for activist continued editing/whining.In my opinion articles are supposed to be fair and balanced stating the good and bad and giving the ultimate reader a real perspective. The article I originally wrote has all of that...not continued "negative press" that has yet to solidify into anything wikipedia worthy, but is hearsay and speculation, as activist continues to edit. I have not idea what kinda of "reality" ACTIVIST believes the Frank Prewitt section should aspire too? I understand and except your edits in regards to Prewitt's book. Point taken, understood. Please advise on additional questions. Again, thank you. Andregen8 (talk) 04:14, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Alexandra Penney
Number 316 (200 create/expand - 116 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Problem with interwiki.py
Thank you for reminding me, but I was just cleaning up the mess which was created by a faulty update of "interwiki.py". So no sandboxing advice is needed. Groucho NL Groucho NL (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Please accept my apologies and understand that the removal of extensive numbers of interwiki links without explanation had appeared as vandalism. Alansohn (talk) 21:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. I was a bit in a hurry and skipped the explanation. Next time I'll be more careful, promised. Groucho NL (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Oh gee, I didn't have to wait long for that! Thanks Alansohn :)
I see the way you are going you will soon become our most prolific DYK creator. Maybe we should press a new medal for you :) Gatoclass (talk) 05:08, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
- I can't imagine that after reaching 200 that any editor would stop participating at DYK and creating new articles simply because of the lack of new awards to reach for. I certainly won't. Writing a good new article is mostly its own reward and I'm glad that DYK provides that little bit more of encouragement. Keep up all of your good work at DYK! Alansohn (talk) 16:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Harry Endo DYK
Hello! Your submission of Harry Endo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Otto4711 (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Rood Bridge Park
Number 317 (200 create/expand - 117 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 15:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Nick Scandone
Number 318 (201 create/expand - 117 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 15:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Lloyd Ohlin
Number 319 (202 create/expand - 117 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 22:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Jack Kuehler
Number 320 (203 create/expand - 117 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 10:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Steelmark
Number 321 (204 create/expand - 117 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 10:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Number 322 (204 create/expand - 118 nominations)
Sounds like someone just forgot to add the nom to the credits list. Here ya go :) --Gatoclass (talk) 16:07, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Need your help
I don't want to engage in an edit war with someone, but I feel like the change that I've made to Ohio High School Athletic Association is completely justified, whereas EagleFan doesn't think so. I don't think that listing all high school state champions in every single sport (regardless of the state) is notable. If someone wants to find out then they go to the OHSAA website, not the Wikipedia page on the organization itself. If anything, the list should be its own separate article (at best). Wasting 80,699 kb of space on an article lags the servers, slows down the page load time and for what? To read about non-notable high school achievements. Can you please respond to EagleFan and otherwise show why I am not in the wrong for this please. Thanks. -Jrcla2 (talk)(contribs) 00:35, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Oh and you can check out the talk page to read others' comments. -Jrcla2 (talk)(contribs) 02:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have been taking a look at the OHSAA article and talk page and I will reply after further research. Alansohn (talk) 15:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I also need your help at Shaukat Aziz page. I am not promoting vandalism and I wish to appreciate the Economic success we made under him. Someone just reverts it and accuses Shaukat Aziz of false dealings. I don't want to engage in edit war also? help me ```` —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brosnan us (talk • contribs) 22:39, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Uncalled for Warning
Alansohn,
I have been attempting to update Callum Ferguson's nickname to reflect his actual nickname, which is "Cheese". However, I believe you have labelled this as a Level 2 warning. Could you please allow this change to go ahead?
I had looked for any source to support "Cheese" as a nickname before issuing the warning and found none. A more thorough search after you left your note also could not find a single reliable and verifiable source that calls Ferguson by the nickname "Cheese". An edit with no edit summary by an editor with very other edits raises red flags and I hope you understand why I had questions about the edit when it was made and have even more concerns now. While it is certainly possible that Australian sources are not as easy to find, their absence would need to be addressed before readding this nickname. Alansohn (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I understand your concern, However I can assure you that Callum Ferguson's nickname is indeed "Cheese". I attended high school with Callum and coined the nickname myself due to the poor quality of his jokes, as well as his love for cheese. Although the internet may be a wonderful place to spend the majority of your spare time (which appears to be plentiful), it does not hold all the answers to life's questions. Again, I request that you leave the nickname "Cheese" on Callum's page next time I change it.
DYK for squad number (association football)
Number 323 (204 create/expand - 119 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 11:52, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I erased the "hardest language" section...
I erased the "hardest language" section in the article "Hungarian language" as it was not scientific in its content but subjective. (As a Wikipedia user I am a novice, and I did not intent any vandalism. Sorry for the misunderstanding.) What about the merging the article "hardest language" within the article "language learning aptitude"? It is strongly urged in that article by Wikipedia for the same reason I mentioned above. Is that acceptable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.104.70.109 (talk) 17:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 18:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Why are you deleting my changes?????? - Stop calling me a vandel!!! - Your article is a load of rubbish so stop spreading garbage about my football club! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.144.130 (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Your edits to Derby County F.C. have been deleting content. Please add content, with required sources, and leave existing content unchanged. Alansohn (talk) 18:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Entropa
Why did you delete my edit on Entropa? I work in the Justus Lipsius building where it is displayed and have been able to take a close look at the work in question. You can check the information on Italy's part by taking a close look at this photo on the BBC website: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/7827747.stm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.247.162.29 (talk) 21:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Gedalio Grinberg
Number 324 (205 create/expand - 119 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 23:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Nathan George Horwitt
Number 325 (206 create/expand - 119 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey
The WWE Alumni did not have any reliable sources so that is why I deleted it it was not vandilizim. Benton Tigers 00:12, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Will reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 04:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
You should not have reverted me. I worked hard and everything I said was true.
24.17.54.159 (talk) 05:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)J. Bag.
DYK Tanen
Hello! Your submission of Ned Tanen at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Eustress (talk) 12:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
asking for help
Noticed that you contributed to B.H. Carroll Theological Institute page
i have created page for it's Chancellor Russell H. Dilday, and due to my inexperience had had trouble getting it to look right.
might you help by taking a look?
thanks
ccirulli —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ccirulli (talk • contribs) 18:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- I have made a number of changes to the article, most notably adding sources. I will continue to moniotr the article and encourage you to add any additional material about Dilday and be sure to include reliable and verifiable sources. If you have any questions about formatting, add the source and I will be happy to tweak it as needed. Alansohn (talk) 23:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for doing the Al Hall (Athlete) page
Just wanted to thank you for putting together the page on Al Hall back in November. I am his son, Shawn, and was very pleased to see it. I did add in the missing birthdate. I would like to add a photo if that meets with your approval.
Again, thank you.
Shawn Hall Ghosttowner33 (talk) 23:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note and correcting any errors. The article was my pleasure to create and to have others read. Alansohn (talk) 23:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for John McGillicuddy
Number 326 (207 create/expand - 119 nominations)
DYKadminBot (talk) 17:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Claude Jeter
Number 327 (208 create/expand - 119 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Ned Tanen
Number 328 (209 create/expand - 119 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 12:20, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for William Thomas Pecora
Number 329 (209 create/expand - 120 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 12:21, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Harry Kinnard
Number 330 (210 create/expand - 120 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 00:40, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Halle Berry's Heritage
I wonder if this should be noted about Halle heritage: Her maternal grandmother was English. Also has other English (distantly related to the Baronets Beresford, Viscounts of Tyrone, Earls of Tyrone and Marquesses of Waterford, to Barons Decies and to Baron Beresford, and to the Marquess of Campo-Maior Count of Trancoso in Portugal), Irish, German and remote Dutch ancestry.. I got this info from here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000932/bio Thanks! Neptunekh (talk) 00:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- IMDb is problematic because the material can be user-update, just like Wikipedia. Try to find the material in reliable newspapers or magazines to confirm the details you found at IMDb. Alansohn (talk) 01:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
A request for a Bob May biography
I know this is a little odd but I know you're really good at creating/expanding biographical articles, especially for folks that have recently died so there's plenty of widely available online sourcing for them. I noticed that nobody has jumped in to expand Bob May (actor), the Lost in Space actor who died this weekend. I'd appreciate it if you could find the time to work up a suitable article for Bob May. It's bound to be just chock full of hook-y facts, perfect for a DYK nomination. Just a thought. - Dravecky (talk) 09:44, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- I will do my best to go through the obis and expand the article. Alansohn (talk) 13:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Evelyn Lauder
Number 331 (211 create/expand - 120 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 19:10, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Incorrect Reversion
The change to Asahi Beer is NOT a vandalism. That IS the translation, and there is no point in providing a colloquialism without providing the translation. If there is no translation, the information is useless to non-Japanese speakers. I know it is a strange thing to call a building, but once you see it, you will understand. Check the discussion page of Asahi where I made comments about my edit.
You should not assume something is vandalism when you don't speak the language in question. I will be reverting the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.228.21.40 (talk) 04:27, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
The history of vandalism is not my fault. This is a public computer. Here are the translations of Kin (gold) and unchi (poop). No is a posessive marker. http://eow.alc.co.jp/%e9%87%91/UTF-8/?ref=sa
http://eow.alc.co.jp/%e3%81%86%e3%82%93%e3%81%a1/UTF-8/
Please revert. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.228.21.40 (talk) 04:39, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Harry Endo
Number 332 (212 create/expand - 120 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 07:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Quotable quotes?
"It's amazing what a small handful of editors with the goal of improving this encyclopedia can do to create properly sourced and thorough articles in the face of the still-festering forces of knee-jerk deletionism." :) ChildofMidnight (talk) 16:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
- I set this quote aside as a possible epitaph on my tombstone. Alansohn (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Jones International
Please don't send me numerous notifications (one was enough ---> more will be considered as abuse) about my mistake with formatting the content. If you want to help, make the explanations about moving pages on wiki easier then they are right now. Wiki became a sea of links in which is hard to find exactly what you need. They should come up with a section of "Help with Wiki's Help"!!!
Alex Enniss 20:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexenniss (talk • contribs)
- The second notification came after the second attempt at a cut-and=paste move. I agree that WP:Requested moves can be a bit daunting the first time, but efforts have been made to make it somewhat self-explanatory. Try to follow the steps as indicated and feel free to ask me for help in the move. Alansohn (talk) 21:02, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Smashing Pumpkins
RE: reverted edit to Smashing Pumpkins page (Dec 2008) - I agree the edit was unconstructive and should be deleted, but the edit certainly didn't come from me or my computer. I've never edited any Wiki page, this edit being my first so I hope I'm doing it properly! Regards, ram1967@bigpond.net.au
- The edit may have been from another editor using the same computer. Alansohn (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Head Shop
RE: Head Shop reverted. I have no idea why you reverted my addition to "head shop". It's a bit of history that is getting lost in our culture. I provided a background, discussion, and signed the post; yet you removed it. I would be very appreciative if you would please put it back or provide a detailed explanation of 'why' it was removed so that I can address it personally. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me 'directly'; larrystalley@aol.com. Tks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.120.56.9 (talk • contribs)
- Entries are not signed in articles, which attracted my attention, but the issue is that it does not have a source. i attempted to search through any reliable source -- especially newspapers and magazines -- that might support the claim, but found none, leading me to the conclusion that this was vandalism. If you have a reference that meets Wikipedia standards on reliable sources to support the claim, I woul be more than happy to assist you in adding the material, with the required reference. Alansohn (talk) 16:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I need to be banned
I can't stop vandalizing pages. If you don't ban me I will do it again. It's a serious problem, I can't stop. Please do me a favor and ban me from editing pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.160.148.51 (talk • contribs)
I'm sorry
I have to apologise for my editing. I can assure you that what i edited was what i thought to be relevant information for viewers of of the page. It won't happen again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.95.179 (talk) 19:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Lipari Landfill
Number 333 (213 create/expand - 120 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 20:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Charles Morgan, Jr.
Number 334 (214 create/expand - 120 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
russell dilday
thanks much for your beautiful work on Russell H. Dilday. your a star ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.94.210.76 (talk • contribs)
- My pleasure to help. The B. H. Carroll Theological Institute article was a formative part of my Wikipedia experience, and I am gald to be able to help. I will keep an eye on the article. Alansohn (talk) 05:30, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Philip De Witt Ginder
Number 335 (215 create/expand - 120 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 07:51, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Schillinger v. United States
Number 336 (215 create/expand - 121 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 13:41, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Blocked for 24 hours
I've blocked you for 24 hours, per your editing restrictions, for incivility. Your comments towards User:Good Olfactory, at this CFD and other CFDs involving him recently, have crossed the line. You have attacked the nominator rather than just commenting on the nomination, and accused him viscious insensitivity and ignorance. For his part, he has repeatedly asked you to refrain from making personal attacks. Such ad hominem attacks are not civil, fail to assume good faith, and are not acceptable, regardless of how emotionally charged the subject matter may be. Nor is it acceptable to target individuals because you disagree with them; this is not the first time you have done so in CFD, but I hope it will be your last. Please think about how you can contribute to creating a more positive and constructive atmosphere during your block. Postdlf (talk) 21:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is a pathetic joke. I can count on you to defend one of the sickest trivializations of the Holocaust I have seen in my entire life. Given that I, relatives, and friends have lost family members due to Hitler and the Nazis, it took me quite a great deal of time to write what I did at an appropriate level of discourse. Whether the block is overturned or not, I do plan to pursue sanctions against User:Good Olfactory for his sickening abuse of process in using his friendship with you to facilitate his efforts to silence criticism of one of the grossest violations of basic decency of the world's greatest tragedy that I have ever seen. That you would so readily by into his abuse of process only reflects even more negatively on you. Alansohn (talk) 23:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Alansohn, I recently struck out your comments at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_January_22#Category:Holocaust_survivors that led to the block and I've explained why underneath. However, judging by the above comments and your challenge to your block, you do not regret these comments and so I have reversed this strike out, as I would guess at this stage that that would be against your wishes. Incidentally, I have no "friendship" with Postdlf; we have had very few interactions on WP in all my time as a user. We happen to both be WP users, and I took my concerns to a person I viewed as an uninvolved administrator. Thanks, Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- My only regret about my remarks is that I did not take a stronger stance against your offensive remarks. I would strongly suggest that the action that should be taken here is to have your despicably offensive remarks trivializing the suffering of those who endured Nazi persecution outside of concentration camps. Your remarks are so grossly offensive and betray an utter disregard of the horrors of the Holocaust. Your previous trivializations of child molestation were similarly offensive, but your Holocaust remarks are beyond the pale of basic decency and good taste. Refactor your nomination at CfD and remove your shamelessly offensive statements or I will have them deleted. Again, I stand 100% by my stand against your trivialization. Let's hear your stand to justify your Holocaust trivialization. Alansohn (talk) 03:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
- I had planned on working on a few articles that I'll create offline while this punitive block passes pointlessly away, one of which is for the forthcoming Anti-Nazi Boycott of 1933 article. Rabbi Stephen Samuel Wise one of the boycott's organizers, was asked what the point of the boycott was if it did not stop the Nazis from persecuting Jews. Wise responded that "We must speak out", but "if that is unavailing, at least we shall have spoken." Some 75 years later, after six million Jews were killed by these same Nazis, the least I could possibly do would be to speak out against those who could have the gall to trivialize the experiences of those who lived through the terror of the Hitler era but were not officially admitted into concentration camps, because "any Jew who lived in Europe during the Nazi-era could technically call themself a 'Holocaust survivor'". Any decent person should be repulsed by this characterization. At least I have spoken. Alansohn (talk) 04:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Unblock request
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Alansohn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The edit that has been used to justify this block, here, revolves around a CfD in which User:Good Olfactory insisted that Holocaust survivors should not be categorized "because any Jew who lived in Europe during the Nazi-era could technically call themself a 'Holocaust survivor'". Given that I, relatives, and friends have lost family members due to Hitler and the Nazis, it took me quite a great deal of time to write what I did at an appropriate level of discourse to address User:Good Olfactory's unacceptable trivializations of the world's greatest tragedy, the deaths of six million Jews and millions of others. I know, have met, read the works of and heard lectures from Holocaust survivors, almost all of whom are still deeply scarred from their experiences, and none feel that they used a "technicality" to call themselves "Holocaust survivors" if they were hunted down like dogs but managed to escape being put in a Nazi concentration camp and near-certain death. I had hoped that after reading my response to his unacceptable wording, that User:Good Olfactory might have realized how the gross insensitivity and callousness in his choice of words -- even if explicit anti-semitism was not the source of his wording -- and refactored his nomination and offered an apology. Instead, User:Good Olfactory's only response was to pursue a block. I would love to hear a justification for his gross insensitivity in wording and for the actions that have been taken as part of this process.
Decline reason:
Without getting into all of this, let's be as simple as possible. You called him ignorant. That's at the very least uncivil and quite possibly a personal attack. Your editing restrictions say that you are to be blocked in any instance of incivility. Your incivility continues in your unblock request, as you continue to accuse him of bad faith and seem to be accusing him of Anti-Semitism, despite the fact that you said you weren't. — Smashvilletalk 00:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Fighting a block is pointless when no administrator has the decency to address the offensive remarks made by User:Good Olfactory, ones that he still stands by, despite the clearly insensitive and provocative tone of his statements. As User:Good Olfactory refuses to recast or refactor his remarks or withdraw his CfD, despite the clarifications I have offered. I stand by remarks 100% and my only regret is that I had not taken more forceful action to address his blatant Holocaust trivialization that defames anyone who endured the Nazi era, whether in a concentration camp or not. That admins refuse to address this only adds insult to a rather grievous injury. Alansohn (talk) 01:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Aryeh Neier
Number 337 (216 create/expand - 121 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 01:20, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Gary Kurfirst
Number 338 (217 create/expand - 121 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 18:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Harold Snyder
Number 339 (218 create/expand - 121 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
BLP
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Nicole Marciano. Thank you. Kingturtle (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Ur giving out to me
You told me my edit to Bobby Brown was reverted your stupid !!!!! i didnt even edit bobby brown page and i have never heard of him you got the wrong person you idiot now be more careful you stupid idiot !!!!!!!!! I HATE YOU!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.44.0.84 (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Just doing my job. Thanks for the note. Alansohn (talk) 21:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Mark Thompson
Hi, with regard to the edit, as I explained in the summary I didn't delete it, just moved most of it to BBC Controversies where it was missing and is more relevant, leaving an outline of the controversy on Thompson's page - you can't cover every controversy in depth on Thompson's page as there's not enough room! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.178.253 (talk) 22:07, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- I do see in reviewing the edits that this was the case. Please accept my apologies for the warning as I did not see that this was happening at the time. Alansohn (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Set List
is Breatheheavy.com a reliable source..because if it isnt the set list that was reverted back on to the The Circus Starring: Britney Spears, should be removed. I think its only been reverted because an anon user took off that much content without a reason..maybe you could look in to this? but im not too sure that it is. thanks in advance..and CHEERS!!!--EmperorofPeopleEverywhere (talk) 22:25, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm betting it isn't reliable, but I'll check further. Thanks for the note. Alansohn (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Joseph P. Williams
Number 340 (219 create/expand - 121 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 23:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
If it would help you
Alansohn, if it would help in any way at all with your WP life, you should know that I'm sorry that you were offended by some of my comments at CfD. As I've also told User:Historicist, it hasn't been my intent to offend you or anyone else. I think if you knew me you'd recognise that, but of course it's always relatively easy to be misunderstood in print form. Thanks, ol' buddy. Good Ol’factory (talk) 06:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- I appreciated the note, but I was still a bit hot under the collar from dealing with the block you pushed for. I thought I'd wait a day or two to cool off a bit and see what your actions were, which speak louder than words, as always. Waking up this morning to a sockpuppet investigation that couldn't possibly have been successful, filed less than 24 hours after leaving what could pass for an apology, didn't convince me that your words pasted above were sincere. I'm still not sure what it is that you're trying to accomplish, or why you're pushing the admin who found your sockpuppet expedition to be unfounded to find something that isn't there. Since you filed this sockpuppet investigation, I've made a thousand edits, started three or four articles and nominated two or three of them for DYK. I'm more than willing to move on. It's well past time that you did. Alansohn (talk) 02:52, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- I want you to know I am not pushing the admin to "find" anything, nor did I earlier push for a block against you. If my sole goal or purpose was to have you blocked, it would be quite simple for me to just block you for incivility per the restriction. But because in each case I was otherwise involved, it was appropriate for me to seek a neutral appraisal of the appropriateness of the comments that concern me. It's clear the CU was "inconclusive" (leaning more to negative) and I personally take your word on the matter. The CU result combined with your word led me to have considered the issue closed, which then left me scratching my head about the need for the points you set out there (which I feel are more examples of incivility, but I understand you may disagree). Honestly, I would have approached you personally about the issue rather than filing a CU request if I had not felt you were in a state of perpetual attack mode against everything I post on WP. My view is quite simple: regardless of how many or what type of edits anyone does—if the user can't be civil to other editors in comments and disagreements with them, the user's being disruptive. You don't have to agree with me about any substantive content issues at all—you just need to be polite about it and not assume the worst. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:09, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Incidentally, Lar just posted a message on his page where he told us to calm down and he mentioned mediation in passing. That's not something I would invite you into, but if you really want to address some sincere concerns you have about me, I would have no problem addressing any issues about myself before a neutral third party. It does little good to "put new wine in old bottles" by bringing up historic concerns every time there is a new disagreement, so if you need to air those concerns to someone, I can agree to be there to present my POV. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:16, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- If you take a look at CfD, you'll find I agree with you as often as I don't. As someone else I've disagreed with at times said recently, "Sure I said I wouldn't respond to your comments, but I didn't mean that to include when you were wrong" (maybe a slight paraphrase) and I will maintain that same privilege with you, with a good deal more restraint. I will try not to assume the worst, as you have requested, but there also needs to be a bit more balance in a process that's stacked against categories up for discussion. My suggestion to create and improve articles is intended to show that once your articles and categories are targets for deletion, you don't feel the same way deleting the work of others. Try creating an article or two. It's a lot of fun. Mediation only seems to fan the flames. Alansohn (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I acknowledge that we do agree on balance probably more often than not—it's just, as you say, they get less notice, don't they? I'm also fine when you or anybody else disagrees with me on the substantive issues; it generally doesn't bother me when a discussion proposal I make "fails", because often I think the discussion brings out some good points that I (and hopefully some others) hadn't thought of before, and often even though the initial proposal isn't carried forward, there's an agreement to rename or something for clarity purposes. So please don't hesitate to disagree just so you won't be disagreeing with me. As long as things don't get personal, I'll have no right of complaint about that.
- Funny you should mention it, but I have been creating articles more lately; in fact, one of the of articles I recently started was just deleted via AfD this week. It was a good discussion, and one user there gave me a good idea how to approach the topic with an article of a different name, so it was worthwhile. I've also been doing some categorizing of Oceanic people by previously non-existent first-level administrative country subdivision categories—people from the New Jerseys of the Pacific, as it were.
- I'll have to take your word on mediation, since I've never gone that route before. I can imagine it's probably not the best strategy if you're trying to let bygones by bygones.
- Anyway, I hope you will accept my apologies for the things I've done to upset you. I'm a bit of a goof-ball, so undoubtedly some things I say in a friendly or good-natured way are interpreted differently by readers. And as I said in the CU thing, I have no problem with saying the vast majority of your editing work I've seen is very good. Good Ol’factory (talk) 04:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Re edit reverted
i am afraid that i found you personally victimising and do not appreciate the comments you've made about me i would apreciate it if in future you dont try to contact me —Preceding unsigned comment added by X x B x x (talk • contribs) 18:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- This is in reference to the reversion of this edit, which I think speaks for itself. Alansohn (talk) 21:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the personal attack on my talk page. =) -- 21:43, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism controversy
Did you know about the Wiki vandalism discussion that's been advertised in the press? [1] I know from your user page that you have technical ideas related to this. I've added a couple messages suggesting that it would be good to consult anti-vandalism editors (and systems analysts) about how to proceed, rather than putting it to a popular vote right away. I thought you might have your own perspective on the overall discussion. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 03:35, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note and for thinking that I might be helpful. I have thought long and hard about the subject and I appreciate the reminder. Alansohn (talk) 04:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For being what I see as the best vandal-whacker on the project. Some of the others are faster, and some of them spend longer each day working, but you are the only one that when I see an AIV report, I KNOW that there is no need to spot check your work. You are the only person working the recent changes that I feel safe in trusting your judgment unquestioningly. Thank you very much. Trusilver 04:31, 27 January 2009 (UTC) |
- I am truly overwhelmed by your description of my work and I can only hope that I have genuinely earned this recognition. While I am sometimes disappointed to "lose" a revert to another editor, I do hope that spending a little more time will result in a more accurate and complete removal of vandalism. Thank you for all of your anti-vandalism work and for this bit of recognition. Alansohn (talk) 05:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Leonard Andrews
Number 341 (220 create/expand - 121 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Notice added by SPI clerk Mayalld (talk) 07:40, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting my user page :) Stephenb (Talk) 12:57, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Aron Moscona
I've made another comment at DYK. - Mgm|(talk) 14:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- I will continue rewording. See my response at T:TDYK. Alansohn (talk) 18:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Removing an AIV comment
I've started this thread to give you an opportunity to explain this if you'd care to do so. Daniel Case (talk) 16:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Still don't know how it happened, but see my response at WP:AIV. Alansohn (talk) 18:45, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. Sorry about that ... I don't use Huggle and I am unfamiliar with it. Clearly this is more than just a quirk, it's a bug that should be fixed. Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- No need for an apology here. Huggle not only has changed my mindset, but it sometimes seems to have a mind of its own. I'm glad the folks from Huggle saw this going on and popped, which should be the best next step to resolving the issue. Thanks for all of your work where we cross paths, especially at both AIV and DYK. Keep up the great work! Alansohn (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- No need for an apology here. Huggle not only has changed my mindset, but it sometimes seems to have a mind of its own. I'm glad the folks from Huggle saw this going on and popped, which should be the best next step to resolving the issue. Thanks for all of your work where we cross paths, especially at both AIV and DYK. Keep up the great work! Alansohn (talk) 19:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. Sorry about that ... I don't use Huggle and I am unfamiliar with it. Clearly this is more than just a quirk, it's a bug that should be fixed. Daniel Case (talk) 15:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
How could you revert so fast
you must be god or something!!!! awesome --91.66.189.224 (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- This has to be one of the nicest comments I have ever received, even if it wasn't intended that way. Alansohn (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Hello
Hey dude, Nice shot on the Perez Hilton article. I was about to restore it from before that vandalism by those fools, but something was up with the refreshing, and then I couldn't even see the history past this morning's time. But that HG application you used - nice going :) Peace ~ GoldenGoose100 (talk) 18:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
- I was so pissed to see that there was still vandalism after the revert, so I went back one edit at a time to revert back to the pre-vandalism version. Thanks for the note. Alansohn (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Bob May (actor)
Number 342 (221 create/expand - 121 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for 2009 Tour of California
Number 343 (222 create/expand - 121 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 03:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Brenton Butler case
Number 344 (222 create/expand - 122 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 03:57, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Moses S. Margolies
Number 345 (223 create/expand - 122 nominations)
Gatoclass 15:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
A thanks for reverting user page vandalism
Thank you for noticing and reverting the vandalism to my user page. Best regards -- simxp (talk) 19:18, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page. --Captain-tucker (talk) 23:17, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/58/Pint_of_Grolsch.jpg/48px-Pint_of_Grolsch.jpg)
Captain-tucker (talk) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
- Thanks for the pint! I had a bit of a challenge tilting my monitor, but it was quite refreshing, even if a bit small. For my next pint I will adjust my monitor to a larger size. Alansohn (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
I appreciate the help de-vandalizing my user page... thanks! —Noah 05:31, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Holly Coors
Number 346 (224 create/expand - 122 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Jessurun Cardozo
Hello! Your submission of Jessurun Cardozo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Paxse (talk) 13:59, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Shigeo Fukuda
Number 347 (225 create/expand - 122 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 15:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Reverting my Edit
Parapsychology is a pseudoscience. Why on earth is wikipedia giving it a space for its lies? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloody21 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Reverting edits on my talk page
You recently reverted an edit on my talk page made by Ifyouarehere (talk · contribs). Admittedly, this user is practicing vandalism, but his edit to my page was harmless. Why revert that? Just curious. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I had seen his repeated vandalism and when I saw the edit it had appeared as vandalism. I tried to undo the revert and warning, but Huggle was unable to do so. This was clearly an error on my part and I had realized about a billionth of a second after I reverted. Thanks for the note and the correction. My apologies Alansohn (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Careful when reverting vandalism
Be careful when you revert vandalism, as you recently did on Apollo 11. Make sure you're not just reverting back to another vandalized level. Your anti-vandalism efforts are appreciated, though. TJRC (talk) 17:39, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- When I read the change it appeared as vandalism, and i vacillated after reading it, especially its placement in the lead. In retrospect, I agree that it may have been improperly placed, but was not true vandalism. Thank you for the note and for warning me of what is almost certainly an error on my part. Alansohn (talk) 17:43, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, that's not what I'm saying. You were right to revert that edit. However, the version you reverted to was another vandalizing edit. Don't use rollback in a situation like this. Rollback simply reverts all consecutive edits made by a particular editor. In this case, there were two consecutive acts of vandalism, made by two different editors. You rolled back to the first vandal's edit. Only use rollback to get to a good edit. The better tool here is to go into the page's history, and do a diff back to a known good version; and then use undo (not rollback) to revert to that good level. TJRC (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Understood. I am still getting accustomed to Huggle features in dealing with situations like this, and will be more careful of such situations in the future. Alansohn (talk) 18:45, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- No, that's not what I'm saying. You were right to revert that edit. However, the version you reverted to was another vandalizing edit. Don't use rollback in a situation like this. Rollback simply reverts all consecutive edits made by a particular editor. In this case, there were two consecutive acts of vandalism, made by two different editors. You rolled back to the first vandal's edit. Only use rollback to get to a good edit. The better tool here is to go into the page's history, and do a diff back to a known good version; and then use undo (not rollback) to revert to that good level. TJRC (talk) 18:42, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Reliable sourcing
Then at the very least, the sources written by proponents of parapsychology should be removed from the reference list of that article. If we are looking for reliable third party sources, an article written by a parapsychologist can't be trusted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bloody21 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- In many cases, articles would be better if they weren't edited by proponents (or opponents) of the article's subject. However, as long as there is no direct conflict of interest, Wikipedia policy allows everyone to edit almost every article. Issues of content and balance, as well as concerns of conflict of interest, should be discussed at the article's talk page. Material should not be removed before discussion in an article of this nature. Alansohn (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I guess I should probably learn my lesson after seeing this edit, in which User:Bloody21 changed the article for Fecal Matter (band) to read "see Feces. Oh, and Alansohn is a purveyor of pseudoscience for not stating blatantly that it is one in the parapsychology article." Alansohn (talk) 01:00, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
User page
Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 19:18, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Haskel Lookstein
Number 348 (226 create/expand - 122 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 21:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Joseph Lookstein
Number 349 (227 create/expand - 122 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 21:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Bacon Explosion
I know you're more of a biography writer but if wanted a short break from the recently deceased I bet you could take the tiny, newly-created stub article about Bacon Explosion and craft an interesting article out of it, more than suitable for DYK. Heck, the New York Times article alone should make this workable. Just a suggestion. - Dravecky (talk) 21:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
for the vandalism revert. --Kbdank71 03:34, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- Always a privilege to help another vandalism fighter. I think you had just done a revert on my user page (something about bagels, if I recall), so I extend my thanks to you as well. Alansohn (talk) 03:38, 30 January 2009 (UTC)r
Dead center
Man you really hit the nail on the head with this one. Cheers, Alcmaeonid (talk) 15:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know how you found this, but every time I re-read it I'm all the more baffled as to why we make vandalism so easy. Thanks for reading and responding. Alansohn (talk) 16:20, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Regarding the undo of article 24
Please check this article24 yourself before reverting into vandalized version. Cluebox reporting system isn't working. Otherwise I'll file a report rather than just undoing cluebox's change.--Afya (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Lorene Rogers
Number 350 (228 create/expand - 122 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
DYK for John Brooks (writer)
Number 351 (228 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
NYC Meetup: You're invited!
![]() |
New York City Meetup—Museum Extravanganza
|
Join us the evenings of Friday February 6 and Saturday February 7 around Wikipedia Loves Art! museum photography events at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and the Brooklyn Museum.
There will also be a special business meeting on Saturday dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues with guests from the Wikimedia Foundation.
You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:02, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
Leon Klenicki
Thank you for expanding the stub. Bongomatic 01:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Nora Kovach
Number 352 (229 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism!?
my editing of cloverfield was completely factual. As a doctor I have personal experience with people fainting and in somecases drowing in their own vomit after seeing cloverfield.
I suggest you do your research before deleting my edits.
I am ironbatman (talk) 02:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- I look forward to seeing the sources about viewers drowning in their own vomit. Alansohn (talk) 02:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Panarican
I came across this page just now and I noticed that another user suggested deleting it. I "blanked" the page as the bot told me but this does not seem to delete the article. Then, your auto-response system told me I "vandalized." There was no vandalism, just and attempt to delete a page. I read the criteria for deletion, and this article *more* than qualifies. I have not edited Wikipedia before; how do I delete a page the right way? I also plan on registering as a user soon. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.74.125.107 (talk) 03:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for the warning. Make sure to include an edit summary that explains that you are blanking the article in advance of deletion. Alansohn (talk) 03:39, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Reverting template vandalism
Hi, I was trying to revert what appeared to be vandalism to this template [2]. My change appeared to work, but I don't see it reflected in the articles that use that template. Also, second question, there were links to products that Carey endorses, and that seemed inappropriate. Thoughts? Piano non troppo (talk) 05:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- You may need to refresh your cache after a template change as your browser may pull in an old copy. Regarding produce endorsements, I find that hard to understand, but I would check on the template talk page and get feedback. Alansohn (talk) 05:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Whacks self in head. Laughs. THANK YOU. Piano non troppo (talk) 06:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Constance Cook
Number 353 (230 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Franz Leichter
Number 354 (231 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for George Michaels
Number 355 (232 create/expand - 123 nominations) NOTE: This DYK was added manually for a missing entry in the triple with Constance Cook and Franz Leichter
Dravecky (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for James Brady (columnist)
Number 356 (233 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Spreading the word....
From this discussion, we get the box on the right - cool eh? Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Ivan the Terrible
Concerning [3] and [4]. Alansohn, this piece of text should be removed, because it is unsourced. The linked reference text does not contain what I have taken out. Now I want to clarify, why user:wilder thinks this text could be in the article. Please try not to add this piece of text again before you find an appropriate source for it. Thanks! 戦車 besuch mich 18:44, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
P.S. besides that adding “the“ to ”1525” is useless.
- See reply with warning removed at user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 19:31, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for John Isaacs
Number 357 (234 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 19:24, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Reinstating vandalism by accident
Hi! I see you're doing a fantastic job of reverting vandalism, and just wanted to bring to your attention [5] this reversion which appears to have coincided with another user (Captmondo) doing the same thing, with the result that the you undid the good undo and reinstated the vandalism that Captmondo undone. I guess if you'd been moments earlier you'd have got an edit conflict, but as it was Captmondo got in between you spotting the vandalism and undoing it yourself. Can I suggest that you check the history after each undo? Keep up your excellent work, which is really appreciated. Thanks -- Timberframe (talk) 19:26, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. I do try my best to check edit histories, scrolling back through prior edits to ensure that I am reverting correctly, and did so for this specific revert in question. I'm not sure what happened here, but it may be the equivalent of a Huggle edit conflict overlaying a simultaneous revert. I do try to be as cautious as possible, but I will be even more cautious in avoiding such possible errors. Alansohn (talk) 19:34, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:LorettaWeinberg.jpg
![File Copyright problem](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:LorettaWeinberg.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 20:50, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Anti-Nazi Boycott of 1933
Number 358 (235 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 01:24, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Chromosome 6 Vandalism
I elevated your vandalism warning on the Chromosome 6 (novel) issue, on this talk page, since they simply reverted your changes. I also posted a new level one warning on another IP. I'll try to keep a log of warnings on the talk page of the article. Although it seems obviously the same group of disgruntled students, the IPs are floating. (Incidentally, how do you make the vandalism templates include the name of the article like that?) --Thomas B♘talk 03:08, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Could you check out these edits?
Hi. Could you check out Special:Contributions/144.26.129.2? They have a lot of top edits, and judging by recent edits a lot could be vandalism. I cannot check these myself as I have to leave now. Thanks, Inferno, Lord of Penguins 17:14, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notice. They all seem to have been addressed. Alansohn (talk) 17:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Please do not revert my edits without bothering to check the discussion page where you would have seen that there is no vandalism!
Politicalguy1234 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
- See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 19:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
For this. Andrea (talk) 19:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page! AlexTiefling (talk) 23:33, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Award from: Article Rescue Squadron Hall of Fame
Congratulations, you have been inducted into the Article Rescue Squadron Hall of Fame. I loved your comments at the AfD at Tjandamurra O'Shane after User:RMHED nominated the article.
See the new little Life Preserver at the top of your page?
Coding:
Feel free to add more articles saved awards to your page, and to award other people this award too, for saving articles from deletion on Wikipedia. Ikip (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- While I appreciate the award quite sincerely, there are few things that are more satisfying than saving an article with potential by improving and expanding articles. It's a shame that AfD ends up triggering some of these efforts that should have happened before, but I am always so glad to be able to add the reliable and verifiable sources that so often exist but no one bothered to look for. I truly appreciate the recognition, but seeing the improved articles survive AfD is truly the best reward. Thanks again for your kind remarks. Alansohn (talk) 03:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. There are so many rules which are ignored before an editor puts an article up for deletion: User:Ikip/Del#Strong_arguments I was so impressed by your arguments in that AfD, your arguments I will use later myself. Thank you for the inspiration, and see you in the AfD circuit! Ikip (talk) 03:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
...for the very quick revert of the vandalism to my userpage! I really appreciate it. Keep up the great work! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 04:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Allen Zwerdling
Number 359 (236 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 15:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Ira Eaker (Back Stage)
Number 360 (237 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 15:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Be careful to check to make sure edits are actually vandalism when you reverse them. --24.119.32.80 (talk) 16:08, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- I had looked at previous edits and saw content being removed and material from other articles being pasted in. While it seems likely in retrospect that these edits were well-intentioned and made in good faith, the lack of any explanation in edit summaries from an editor with only about a dozen previous edits where content appeared to be removed without explanation and where previous edits by this editor to the same article appeared problematic, all came together to appear as vandalism. Please be careful to use clear and concise edit summaries, especially where content is being deleted. Alansohn (talk) 16:12, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
Leave me alone
Look at the guy who I edited. I don't want you to bother me. Just leave me alone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobburson (talk • contribs)
- Stop vandalizing and we've got a deal. Alansohn (talk) 16:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
WHY DO U CARE SO MUCH IF PPL VANDALIZE UR SUCH A GEEK. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathgeek515 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
user:198.108.164.5
This user needs to be banned they have vandalized yet another article this time it was Edmonton. This user has been warned multiple times but it has not stopped them from vandalizing.Kyle1278 (talk) 16:47, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Jessurun Cardozo
Number 361 (238 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 09:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Request For Assistance
There is an on-going effort by a User talk:Mashkin to suppress very well sourced historical, geological, and cultural information from the Arabian Peninsula article. It's gotten so bad that its an uphill battle just to include references to material in Encarta, Britannica, the New International Encyclopedia, peer-reviewed Journal articles authored by the Israeli Geological Survey team, links to maps from the US Geological Service/ARAMCO Surveys and so forth - whenever they mention Syria or Palestine.
The Earth Sciences community refer to the whole Arabian subcontinent as the Arabian Peninsula or Arabia, not just the Gulf region. See for example the USGS Map Showing Oil and Gas Fields and Geological Provinces of the Arabian Peninsula.
This morning he posted a request for comments, but only after removing and rewriting most of the material. Needless to say the talk page is already too long to read. harlan (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Engraved (band)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Engraved (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. TN‑X-Man 18:44, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Please ignore the above. I noticed that you split this article off from another page and have removed the speedy tag. Best, TN‑X-Man 18:47, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm? It looks like clear speedy material. Friday (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- It did look that way, but I saw that Alansohn is a member of the Article Rescue Squad, and thus removed the tag to give him and the editor a chance to improve and/or userfy the material. I guess it's kinda moot now, but let me know if I can do anything to help. Best, TN‑X-Man 18:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm? It looks like clear speedy material. Friday (talk) 18:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Aron Moscona
Number 362 (239 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 20:57, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
February 2009 edit??
I didn't make an edit to Mayhem Festival; I was merely reverting a vandals edit. --SamB135 TalkContribs 04:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
- No problem. --SamB135 TalkContribs 04:07, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Robert Palmer (vintner)
Number 363 (240 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 08:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Random question
I saw your comment at the election and am a bit perplexed. I don't remember filing a sockpuppet accusation against you, and according to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alansohn/Archive and User_talk:Lar#Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations.2FAlansohn I wasn't involved in the one that was filed. I looked over the last several months of edits and can't find anywhere we were in common after the AT&T building article we worked on. MBisanz talk 20:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
The comment from your vote has been removed. The rules of the election do not permit comments in the voting section. If you wish to comment on MBisanz, feel free to do so in the comments section of his voting page. Thank you. --Deskana (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Malcolm MacPherson (writer)
Number 364 (241 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 20:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Help with Frank Prewitt
Alansohn, I was curious if you had any guidance for me in regards to Frank Prewitt's page. Another editor continues to play with the wording and inserting vernacular and political hear-say, thus making it one sided in addition to writing unique messages on my talk page. I can truly say, "I didn't start it" but this guy "activist" is quite the vandalizing fiend in addition to making absurd accusations as to my intent with authoring the page in the first place. Please advise. Thank you!! Andregen8 (talk) 06:45, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Used your EXCELLENT one event argument
![WikiThanks](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/WikiThanks.png/43px-WikiThanks.png)
Used your EXCELLENT one event argument, almost verbatim:
See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Morton_Brilliant_(2nd_nomination) Ikip (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Hardcore California
Sorry about that. I had inadvertently made an error in the title of the page. The actual title of the book is: Hardcore California: A History of Punk and New Wave NOT Hardcore California: The History of Punk and New Wave. When I tried to correct the title it didn't work, so I deleted the article and started another with the correct title. Obviously this isn't the way to do it. So please explain.
PB belsipeBelsipe (talk) 08:06, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for We Remember: A Reflection on the Shoah
Number 365 (242 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Leon Klenicki
Number 366 (243 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 13:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
University of South Florida Alumni
Per Wiki:Notability, this is an appropriate entry. Wikipedia does not exist to serve only the positive image of any institution or person. Debra Lafave is a notable alumna of the University of South Florida. You have no legitimate reason to declare her inclusion on the list to be Vandalism or any other prohibited conduct. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.254.164.140 (talk) 21:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Please see University of South Florida List of Alumni discussion page for further discussion of this issue. 69.254.164.140 (talk) 21:12, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for the confusion at first. Both the Lafave article and the Alumni list have been properly sourced. Good working with you. 69.254.164.140 (talk) 21:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- I saw both pages and the sources are appropriate. Alansohn (talk) 21:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b4/Choco_chip_cookie.png/100px-Choco_chip_cookie.png)
-Zeus- has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Thanks for reverting the speedy removes from Cervicography -Zeus-uc 03:32, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- I talked to the user, sounds like it was an accident. I removed speedy4 but left 3 -Zeus-uc 04:04, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. From a review, your actions seem appropriate. Alansohn (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Billy Wilson (American football)
Number 367 (244 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass 16:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
?
Why could you see my edit in 2-3 seconds? --84.62.47.76 (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
- To deal with rampant vandalism, a series of tools allow editors to monitor new edits, identifying and reverting likely vandalism. Alansohn (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For beating me at reverting, but most of all, for beating ClueBot too! <ClueBot-4> Reverted by Alansohn before I saw it. Chasingsol(talk) 17:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC) |
What?
What was wrong with this edit??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shnear (talk • contribs)
- The edit is unencyclopedic and unsourced. Alansohn (talk) 20:51, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks :)
Idiots never worry me though. I tend to collect them. But the talk page looks prettier after your reversions. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello there I am writing up the GA review on New Jersey Route 90 to which you also contributed. Could you help me with a second opinion on the query "Is it broad in coverage" In your humble opinion is it aye or nay? and if nay why? Thank you kind regards SriMesh | talk 03:07, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
WTF
Jesus Christ man. How did you find that article? Thats not even an important article, and I didnt even blank the page.
I hate Wikipedia, it's too difficult to mess up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.9.129 (talk) 03:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Milton Parker
Number 368 (245 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass 03:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Leo Steiner
Number 369 (246 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass 03:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Robert L. Stone
Number 370 (247 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 09:40, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello Kitty.
I redid the edit to Hello Kitty that you undid, because I feel it is *very* relevant. The author of Miffy feels that Hello Kitty is a copy (i.e. Rip-Off) of Miffy and he does have a point. See the quote on this subject on the Miffy page. I phrased this politely (I said "Miffy looks very similar and predates Hello Kitty") so as not to offend the makers of Hello Kitty who might have Japanese copyright law on their side?
Martin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.35.160.133 (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks....
...for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 15:06, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Michael Homer
Number 371 (248 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass 15:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Wrongly accused of vandalism
The school in question, that i said had turned to the Islamic faith, was completely true. I know somebody who goes there and the reason why it might not be on its website, is because it no longer believes in technology. Janitor999 (talk · contribs)
- And the new name is "Cardinal Newman Islam School"? Alansohn (talk) 19:09, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Makes perfect sense. Check out his talk page; I blocked him and he's now on his second unblock request. Postdlf (talk) 20:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Baumhauerite
Hi Alansohn. I created about a mineral from New Jersey named Baumhaumerite. Could you please it edit the page? Here's the link:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baumhauerite. Thanks! Neptunekh (talk) 20:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Blair Lent
Number 372 (249 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 03:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Arlene Mosel
Number 373 (250 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Dravecky (talk) 03:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Christian way of life
Thank you for showing me the Christian way of life. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TaBuAllDay (talk • contribs) 21:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Praise the Lord. Alansohn (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Lack of life
You have no life, do you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.53.210.50 (talk) 22:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's a hobby. Alansohn (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Anonymous/4chan
"F*ck Alansohn for reverting our just changes! Go to his talk page and tell him what a giant faggot he is"
Just thought you should know people are talking about you behind your back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.153.250.8 (talk • contribs)
- Just doing my job. Alansohn (talk) 22:08, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Wait. Is it a hobby to not have life or to edit Wikipedia?
- Oh the irony. It buuurrrnnnsss. J.delanoygabsadds 21:39, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Corn-cob chewing kitten
204.81.202.103 (talk) has given you a kitten! Kittens promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Kittens must be fed three times a day and will be your faithful companion forever! Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a kitten, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. And don't feed him too much corn!
Spread the goodness of kittens by adding {{subst:Kitten}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
http://img.4chan.org/b/res/116662565.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.53.210.50 (talk) 22:11, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Semi-protection
You seem to be quite a target right now, so I semi-protected your talk page for several hours. I doubt you'll be missing anything, but let me know if you'd rather keep it open and unprotected and I'll undo it. Postdlf (talk) 23:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. It was fun to watch the 4chan discussion and see this all behind the scenes. They appear to have moved on. Alansohn (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Joe M. Rodgers
Number 374 (251 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass 03:09, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Paul Galloway
Number 375 (252 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass 03:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Help?
Cut and paste moving to Brock University Faculty of Business While I agree with the name change, the means under which you are trying to implement the move from Brock Faculty of Business to Brock University Faculty of Business violates Wikipedia policy which forbids cut-and-paste moves. Please put this up for renaming at Wikipedia:Requested moves and let me know if I can help. Alansohn (talk) 17:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:OntarioMan"
I don't know how to do this and never meant to violate the policies. Can you do it for me? I looked on the page you quoted but do not understand the procedure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by OntarioMan (talk • contribs) 17:37, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- I set the process in motion at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Uncontroversial_requests. Alansohn (talk) 17:41, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Alan
I've noticed that in the midst of fairly frantic activity at the time I forgot to thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page ([6]). It means a lot to me.
And thank you for your help at the Dominican Republic article. SamEV (talk) 03:49, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Ben Blank
Number 376 (253 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 11:25, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Tom Brumley
Number 377 (254 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 14:23, 15 February 2009 (UTC)]
Calebrod3294
He is a one man epidemic. How long does the infection go on before somebody stops it. He needs a block. {{Help}} 7&6=thirteen (talk) 00:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC) Stan ]
- I agree with your characterization. I filed a report at WP:AIV. Alansohn (talk) 01:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Mira Rostova
Number 378 (255 create/expand - 123 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 04:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
The changes you made to the Algonquin article was not a change from an editor that was a vandal. I am wolastoqiyik, and a member of this language branch. The scope of this article in places was narrow, and failed to represent Maliseet as Algonquin people in places, and this was found after reviewing what defined a Metis-- of which was the term Algonquin, so if another definition is to be derived from this one, then this one should reflect an accurate portrayal of what is and what is not Algonquin. Anishnabek people are one of the many people are either the original or Algonquin derivative speakers according to language history. It was for this reason that I changed the article. I also added information that was more representative of the current defintion of the Algonquin people such as added Indigenous peoples and a reference to an article for the same. This was not vandalism, it was a contribution, and what you are doing is wasting time that was spent on something that was constructive by deleting it, at least from my perspective. If you have anything constructive to share please do so. thank you WM324AHI (talk) 04:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
re: Algonquin article changes and your statement of 'vandalism'
The changes you made to the Algonquin article was not a change from an editor that was a vandal. I am wolastoqiyik, and a member of this language branch. The scope of this article in places was narrow, and failed to represent Maliseet as Algonquin people in places, and this was found after reviewing what defined a Metis-- of which was the term Algonquin, so if another definition is to be derived from this one, then this one should reflect an accurate portrayal of what is and what is not Algonquin. Anishnabek people are one of the many people are either the original or Algonquin derivative speakers according to language history. It was for this reason that I changed the article. I also added information that was more representative of the current defintion of the Algonquin people such as added Indigenous peoples and a reference to an article for the same. This was not vandalism, it was a contribution, and what you are doing is wasting time that was spent on something that was constructive by deleting it, at least from my perspective. If you have anything constructive to share please do so. thank you WM324AHI (talk) 04:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
File:ZCTA 07838 Great Meadows, New Jersey.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:ZCTA 07838 Great Meadows, New Jersey.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:00, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
North Strand Road
Thanks for reverting the vandalism to this article - for some reason the person responsible seems to want to keep vandalising it. Autarch (talk) 09:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for William Close
Number 379 (256 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 13:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- The article on William Close is fascinating. Thank you for writing and sharing. 12.10.167.98 (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- My pleasure! Thanks for the note. Alansohn (talk) 21:58, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage. --Captain-tucker (talk) 17:52, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- The least I can do is watch the back of a fellow Wikipedian. Alansohn (talk) 22:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Please help!
The Utah Grizzlies has been vandalized again! Can you revert it back again? Thank you Raul17 (talk) 20:06, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Are you aware of any bot that can help with redirects? [7]. Dc76\talk 04:12, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
man as nature - intellegence
Wikipedia administrator on intellegence - alansohn
allo my friend,
my name is inge j.clausen in oslo. thanks for good advice on testing my knowlegde. i have checked wikipedia knowlegde on the subjects nature and man.
What is nature?
Is man nature?.
In norway many people belive that man is nature and that everything is nature. But there are also many who are confused in this matter.
What do you think my friend, is man nature on wikipedia?
Sending you good vibes from oslo.
20090218 1337 inge jarl clausen man as nature asking wikipedia.com
facebook: man as nature —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.85.8 (talk) 12:37, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Barn Star
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For tirelessly reverting vandalism...and beating me to it. :) |
You are wrong
This was not vandalism [8]. Only correct interwiki is cs:Vysoká škola finanční a správní. Say "sorry". --213.220.219.85 (talk) 16:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- I agree that the edit was not vandalism. See your talk page for further details. Alansohn (talk) 23:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
barnstar
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Wherever there's vandalism, Alansohn is soon to follow Omarcheeseboro (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2009 (UTC) |
February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Putnam City North High School has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -download | sign! 04:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry for reverting your revert. Got there too late. >:( -download | sign! 04:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Yokaiden
Why are you insisting on putting an inapropriate infobox - a broken one at that - on this article? It isn't manga, and it is explicitly NOT covered by WP:ANIME. I've explained my edits, if you'll look at the edit history. The only one who hasn't is YOU, not that that stopped you from issuing a warning that MY "unexplained edits" could get me blocked. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Gharjamai
You reverted my edit to Gharjamai while I was updating the talk page. Please reconsider. Anish7 (talk) 20:47, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick response. Anish7 (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
You reverted my 'undo' of the previous user's uninformed vandalism - Pls refer to the history of the article and the talk/discussion page before just editing. Thanks. Xghostfacexx (talk) 14:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Jordan Wu
Nobody loves this poor poor soul. This is his cry for help, or in the words of Gary Larson, Helf.
Part of my new religion
Well done for editing that page, you are the first member of my new religion. As a reward a temple has been dedicated to your honor in Southampton and you've become a demigod. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heaven12345 (talk • contribs)
- While other deities appreciate offerings of incense and burnt animals, I prefer cash. Do you need my address for worshippers to pass on their tithes? Alansohn (talk) 21:27, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
The money shall be given to you in the temple. First the worshippers will eat it, then vomit (barf) it out again and it shall be given to you. Notes though are buried in an ostrich egg and the worshippers must eat the egg, then the note can be passed on to you.
DYK for Marshall Loeb
Number 380 (257 create/expand - 123 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 05:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Daniel Seligman
Number 381 (258 create/expand - 123 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 05:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Mark Shepherd (businessman)
Number 382 (259 create/expand - 123 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 05:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Good job!
vandilism is very annoying and you are knocking the junk out of them as well as beating me to the pages keep it up!--ANOMALY-117 (talk) 15:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
You deserve thisAbce2 (talk) 01:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Abce2 |
DYK for Ralph Carpenter
Number 383 (260 create/expand - 123 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 03:40, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
question
what did i do wrong i added on more about the soup all of it was true why should i be blocked
albert fish
i agree with your revert; the whole letter should not be deleted without summarizing. however, there is a discussion section regarding trimming it down and summarizing - will you come to the talk page and discuss? thanks. untwirl (talk) 21:42, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Did You Know problem
Hello! Your submission of Derrell Palmer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Art LaPella (talk) 02:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Serious allegations with little or no sourcing.
Hello, I'm not sure what should be done. An editor has been adding basically unsourced data that I have not been able to corroborate here. This person claims all sorts of proof on their talk page but doesn't produce it. I don't know what to do, but it does seem to me that the source that he mentions in the talk page doesn't do the trick since I could find nothing there. What should be done? Thanx, Friuli (talk) 04:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Panama editing
I don't understand why you reverted my edition in the Panamá article. Independence from spain occured on November 28, 1821. The Villa de Los Santos Cry (Primer grito de independencia) happens on November 10. Then, after more than 80 years of voluntary union to Gran Colombia, on November 3 Panama decided to separate from this country. I don´t recommend you a sandbox, but a history book... 201.227.103.38 (talk) 04:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Appology
I appologize on behalf of my school for all the vandalism that comes out of this IP address. There are a lot of stupid people here, and they like to mess things up. Its a high school, you see... Immortal Z (talk) 14:49, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Peer Portner
Number 384 (261 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 17:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you...
... for recognizing that my redirecting a non-notable song title by Weird Al Yankovic to the album that contains the song is in good faith, as my contribution history demonstrates. In this case, the redirection is superior to an AfD, which would have happened if the redirect is not sustained. Thanks again. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 18:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- I have reverted the article back to its original content. Such a change should not be performed on a long-standing article without any discussion for gathering consensus. Gail (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Bubble94's Userboxes
I was banned, and both the user and talk pages are now gone. I have the right to take down MY content if I so choose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.144.15 (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
You
I really don't like you. Why would you delete my Demi article?! and then say i was "vandilizing." Seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LexiThePickle (talk • contribs) 23:02, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
New bio stub
Hi Alansohn. Did you see Nonnie Moore? Best, Bongomatic 23:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nonnie Moore is what led me to write to you. Thanks for the notification and I have already expanded the article. Alansohn (talk) 15:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for reverting the edit made to my user talk page. Before I even saw it! All the best. Bobo. 02:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Census Bureau map of Cranbury Township, New Jersey.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Census Bureau map of Cranbury Township, New Jersey.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Census Bureau map of Newfield, New Jersey.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Census Bureau map of Newfield, New Jersey.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
I noticed you once edited Eric Kandel, if you are interested in his work, perhaps you can add content to Fred M. Levin, who is an believe in the work of Eric Kandel. Mwalla (talk) 20:44, 26 February 2009 (UTC)mwalla
I think you've got the wrong user. I think you want Canadianeh1. Matt (talk) 23:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- You were correct. User had already been blocked before I could repaste the note. Alansohn (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the reverts!
Hello. Thank you for the revert ([9]) of my "fan club." Your speedy anti-vandal action is much appreciated! Thanks! Kralizec! (talk) 00:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for International Trot
Number 385 (262 create/expand - 123 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 02:39, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Joe Goldstein
Number 386 (263 create/expand - 123 nominations)
--Dravecky (talk) 02:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
You may be interested...
...in the edits of Tpdtruth (talk · contribs). -- Y not? 20:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Some bios
Hi Alansohn. If you're interested, please take a look at:
- Noel Martin. Recently deceased. Old article, not complete (I added some of the basic facts behind the more important color). Could use improvements, other refs.
- William Jorden. Recently deceased. New article, not quite a stub anymore. Would benefit from additional references and perspectives.
Tx, Bongomatic 14:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Faze TV (TV channel)
Number 387 (264 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 15:55, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Another bio
Hi Alsonsohn, added a stub for Rhena Schweitzer Miller. Bongomatic 01:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Why
Its humor man, humor. user:GaryDaFatSnail does not need the welcome box, and if he does he can look in his history. The rest is a response to whats on my page, as well as a greeting. Is all that illegal? I thought not. Please undo it and remove the warning you placed on my page. --BACON EXPLOSION (talk) 05:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Heads up for you
Requesting editor obviously inexperienced, now understands and accepts the situation so just an FYI as it was initially phrased with your name directly Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#Abuse_by_.22Alansohn.22. best. Mfield (talk) 19:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- See reply there. Alansohn (talk) 05:47, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Stanley Dancer
Number 388 (265 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 04:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Su Mac Lad
Number 389 (266 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 04:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Nevele Pride
Number 390 (267 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 04:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Harness Horse of the Year
Number 391 (268 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 04:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Keystone Ore
Number 392 (269 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Shubinator (talk) 04:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
You're gonna love . . .
- Mary Printz; can you also help upgrade
- William Jorden?
Bongomatic 05:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'll go through both. I had a busy weekend, but I will do my best to catch up over the next few days. Alansohn (talk) 05:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK twofer
Numbers 393 and 394 (271 create/expand - 123 nominations)
--Gatoclass (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Robert Robideau
Number 395 (272 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 17:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for J. Max Bond, Jr.
Number 396 (273 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Gatoclass (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Derrell Palmer
Number 397 (274 create/expand - 123 nominations)
Good work! Great work on the DYKs. --Kanonkas : Talk 23:46, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
unconstructive?
why for is you say unconstuctive of my edit. i try help, english teacher show us with help from she. i thank you? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.18.142.130 (talk) 02:46, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 02:49, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Cookie
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9a/Choco_chip_cookie.jpg/100px-Choco_chip_cookie.jpg)
Its the Cookie Monster (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Joke user?
Hi. I see you warned this user: User talk:Da best editor on 26th Feb. They don't seem to do anything constructive, but have amassed many warnings. I don't really see the point in their continuing to use Wikipedia as their personal joke project. Can you please tell me what is supposed to happen next, procedurally? Thanks and best wishes DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 12:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's OK thanks, I think I've got it. Warning 4 then take it to AIV if that does not work, right? Thanks, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 14:19, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Brilliant, thank you very much. Cheers DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 14:32, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your excellent work in removing vandalism with Huggle. You beat me to reverting vandalism several times each day. GT5162 (talk) 17:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC) |
DYK for American Airlines Flight 6780
nomming as well? Victuallers (talk) 19:54, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- If I see a worthy article that catches my eye. This one had a very interesting hook AND a New Jersey connection. Alansohn (talk) 21:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. :) Papercutbiology♫ (talk) 20:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
My change to Vitamin B17
From what I have read it is not toxic and I believe it can cure cancer. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ticklememo (talk • contribs) 21:17, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- The problem is that there is a source from the National Institutes of Health that says it is, which you removed. If you have reliable sources that say it's non-toxic it should be added to show that there is a difference in opinion on the issue. Please do not remove the sourced claim of toxicity. Alansohn (talk) 21:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Here
Hey man, just a quick note to tell you that the IP edit in that link is fine and just here to tell you that I've reverted it. Hope you don't mind. I know how difficult it is to see if an edit is decent or not on Huggle so no worries about that :-) Regards and take, friend. ScarianCall me Pat! 21:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the catch and the correction. Alansohn (talk) 01:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: edit to SRI International
My edit was constructive. You should put it back, or act on it. Or do something else, if that's the officially preferred way to handle a case like this. Nothing in the rest of the paragraph says anything about the subject of the heading which is correctly defined in the first sentence; it's all about clairvoyance and telepathy, nothing about psychokinesis. I for one prefer having some notation inline with the text I'm reading to point out that there's a problem with it.
As you can see, I'm not in the mood to be diplomatic, but I'm not argumentative or aggressive either. I am getting a little tired of the bureaucracy on Wikipedia, and the really bad grammar on most of the article pages. I guess that's one of the places where a professionally reviewed encyclopedia like Britannica has an advantage. On the upside, I like that if I find something wrong I can correct it. . . or at least tag it. Right?? OK, so I guess I am a little annoyed. I wonder if you're annoyed by some of the human-but-not-productive entanglements around here, too. Like, say, vandalism, which it appears is what you were going after; and that's good. Anyway, I won't be back at SRI International, so do what you think is best. Thanks for reading this. 71.242.43.9 (talk) 01:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- See reply on user talk page. Alansohn (talk) 01:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Eiko Shimamiya entries correct details
I am refering to your constant edits and reports on the "Eiko Shimamiya" Wikipedia entry. The new sequal OVA of "Higurashi no naku koro ni" is titled "Higurashi no naku koro ni Rei" NOT "Higurashi no naku koro ni Chikai" the official site states it is titled "Rei", it is mentioned nowhere that it is called "Chikai". Also the OVA has now been released and in the Opening credits, the title song, sung by "Eiko Shimamiya" is listed as "Super scription of data" NOT "Chikai". Please revise your details and check more official sources next time before changing back to "Chikai" again. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yekim (talk • contribs) 06:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- I have searched for sources and found none, nor have you added any of the require reliable sources required by Wikipedia policy. Providing these sources will address my concerns. Alansohn (talk) 12:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
You participated very productively in the AfD for this back in January of 2008; but it's still a puling mass of self-serving publicist's swill, a hagiography of a minor figure. Could you have a hack at the weasel-words and fluff? I've reached my overdose limit for treacle. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:39, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Mike asked me also--shall I let you continue first? my own feeling is for a much more drastic cut? DGG (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- While I wouldn't go as far as Orangemike, I do agree that this needs a lot of work. DGG, if you're willing to hack away, I will accede to your approach and look over your shoulder to follow along. There is an encyclopedic article hidden inside what seems to be a tremendous amount of puffery. Leaving it unchanged is probably the wrong approach. Alansohn (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Will do. DGG (talk) 19:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- While I wouldn't go as far as Orangemike, I do agree that this needs a lot of work. DGG, if you're willing to hack away, I will accede to your approach and look over your shoulder to follow along. There is an encyclopedic article hidden inside what seems to be a tremendous amount of puffery. Leaving it unchanged is probably the wrong approach. Alansohn (talk) 18:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Mike asked me also--shall I let you continue first? my own feeling is for a much more drastic cut? DGG (talk) 18:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the attack
on my talkpage, much appriaciated SpitfireTally-ho! 20:46, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's my pleasure to watch your back. Alansohn (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandals on my user page. FYI: You should invest in archiving bot here.Shawnpoo (talk) 22:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- My pleasure for the revert. I do have a bot set up, but I think something may be broken as I agree that this talk page is getting a bit out of hand. I do appreciate the investment tip, which would probably outperform virtually any other stock or bond one could buy today. Alansohn (talk) 22:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you, sir/madam
...for cleaning up my page and squishing that "vandal". WadeSimMiser (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi! I think you misunderstood my edit as vandalism, I was checking out Special:LongPages, and this article drew my attention, as it was surprisingly on 2nd place with more than 400kb content. The I saw that article was vandalized, filled with the same paragraph "over 9000" times, so I cut it off. And, btw, robots are raging against humanity, copy-pasting same paragraph in the article. 81.95.228.239 (talk) 06:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)