Jump to content

User talk:Panyd/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user is listed as a Highly Active User. This user uses the name Panyd on IRC. This user has a Global Account. This user is an administrator. This user either created or expanded the article Lisa McPherson Trust and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article Thomas Dickson Archibald (judge) and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article Sean Morton and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article Demon Cat and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article John Abel and got it a DYK.
This user either created or expanded the article Andrew Green (ghost hunter) and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article Sandra Ramdhanie and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article Theodore Plucknett and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article Vic Tandy and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article Leslie Flint and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article King House (Mayport, Florida) and got it a DYK. This user either created or expanded the article James Kidd (prospector) and got it a DYK.

Peer review

[edit]

Thank you very much for your suggestions on the William Walton article - they are most helpful and I shall attend to them pronto. At your service if I can ever reciprocate at a peer review, FAC etc. – Tim riley (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks ...

[edit]

... for the barnstar (though I don't deserve it, generally feeling far too tired to be a proper "tireless contributor"). Deor (talk) 23:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Demon Cat

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Demon Cat at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~NerdyScienceDude 02:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

[edit]

Good additions there at Katharine Barker, thanks! --j⚛e deckertalk 19:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the thank you! Hoping I can add something to the project :) PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia NYC Meetup Sat Oct 16

[edit]
New York City Meetup


Next: Saturday October 16th, Jefferson Market Library in Lower Manhattan
Last: 05/22/2010
This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wiki-Conference NYC 2010, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia Ambassador Program and Wikipedia Academy, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the May meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo

[edit]

Thanks fer the day. Catch me on IRC. Ironholds (talk) 23:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Thomas Dickson Archibald (judge)

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

[edit]

DYK for Sean Morton

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin Mentoring: a normal service will be resumed shortly...

[edit]

Hi, Panyd. Because of family commitments, I will not be online much over the next week or so - and if I am, it will be on my mobile 'phone, so my ability to edit is limited!

I'll be back properly from about Monday 25th, so I'll "see" you then! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 22:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for letting me know. Hope everything is ok! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 11:30, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes - "family commitments" is a holiday! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Demon Cat

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Black Eyed Kids

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Black Eyed Kids at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Why did you unlink the valid links to The Times and Western Morning News here? DuncanHill (talk) 01:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was unlinking them in line with WP:Repeatlinks in the MOS. If you think this was incorrect please let me know why! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Because you removed them from the refs - someone consulting the ref should not have to use their browser's "find in this page" function to track down a link to the article on the newspaper being used as a reference. The MoS isn't written from the point of view of people who actually consult articles, alas. BTW, no need to use a talkback template, I do have a watchlist! DuncanHill (talk) 01:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry! Just trying to be helpful :( And duly noted! I will stop removing them from references. Thanks for the heads up! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:17, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No problem - and thank you for being so understanding. All the best, DuncanHill (talk) 01:20, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John Abel

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 18:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Sandra Ramdhanie

[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Sandra Ramdhanie at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 00:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

[edit]

DYK for Andrew Green (ghost hunter)

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Iyaz
Sweetie Irie
Adam Hicks
Kempsville High School
We Are Young Money
Deborah Kara Unger
Phi Life Cypher
Dirty Harry (pinball)
Spacemonkeyz
Oh Africa
Nelson De Freitas
Dirty Vegas (album)
Jansen Panettiere
East Gaston High School
Kerry Brothers, Jr.
American Institute of Chemists
Tomorrow Comes Today
Harry Julian Fink
Madison Pettis
Cleanup
Jay-Z
Rock It (Gorillaz song)
Gorillaz
Merge
Big-game hunter
ROKS Cheonan sinking
The Fame Monster
Add Sources
Eminem
Dirty Harry (musician)
The Bees (UK band)
Wikify
Swan Song (novel)
Damian Marley
The Reflections
Expand
Plastic Beach
Kelly Preston
OMG (song)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Girlguiding Scotland.png

[edit]

Thank you for your upload, however I have reverted to the previous version. The new logo is so different as to warrant upload under a new name, i.e. "File:Girlguiding Scotland new.png" or "File:Girlguiding Scotland 2010.png" instead of overwriting the existing file. The old emblem should be moved lower in the article to maintain historic continuity.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 23:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you get to feeling better soon.--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 23:58, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Been watching your page, glad to see you back!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you guys very much! Good to be back! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 06:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MoN!

[edit]

DYK for Sandra Ramdhanie

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Black Eyed Kids

[edit]

— Rlevse • Talk • 06:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Black Eyed Kids for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Black Eyed Kids, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Eyed Kids (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Eyed Kids

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Black Eyed Kids, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Dædαlus Contribs 10:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

[edit]

It's raining thanks spam!

[edit]
  • Please pardon the intrusion. This tin of thanks spam is offered to everyone who commented or !voted (Support, Oppose or Neutral) on my recent RfA. I appreciate the fact that you care enough about the encyclopedia and its community to participate in this forum.
  • There are a host of processes that further need community support, including content review (WP:GAN, WP:PR, WP:FAC, and WP:FAR). You can also consider becoming a Wikipedia Ambassador. If you have the requisite experience and knowledge, consider running for admin yourself!
  • If you have any further comments, input or questions, please do feel free to drop a line to me on my talk page. I am open to all discussion. Thanks • Ling.Nut (talk) 02:28, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vic Tandy

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vic Tandy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JDOG555 (talk) 21:17, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Theodore Plucknett

[edit]

Orlady (talk) 00:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

[edit]

Clarification request

[edit]

Regarding Lauren Hodges. The actress herself requested the article be deleted? I have two concerns with this:

  1. It seems unusual for anyone in the entertainment industry to shy away from what is essentially free publicity.
  2. There is an editor, User:MR90, who has repeatedly tried to get the article stripped of detail or deleted. The editor has twice been blocked for edit warring and content removal, and may well have created a sock puppet to evade a block. It is not inconceivable that this editor may have faked an OTRS request.

I think you can understand my concern. -- Scjessey (talk) 22:29, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand your concerns. I will look into it and get back to you tomorrow. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have spoken to the person in question and although I cannot confirm 100% that they are the subject, I am WP:AGF with regards to this one. This means that although I cannot categorically state that they are the person in question, and I will update the AfD to reflect this, I am fairly convinced by the evidence which has been presented to me. If you would like the input of other OTRS members, the ticket number is 2010102610006149 and I would be more than happy to discuss this with them. I'm sorry I can't be more transparent with regards to this but we have to protect confidentiality with regards to these matters. If you still have your doubts and think I should probe further, please let me know why and I will see to it that I do. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The request seems peculiar, but I am willing to take it at face value based on your efforts. Thank you for looking into this for me. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution team IRC meeting

[edit]

Greetings! We will be having a meeting of the Contribution and Social Media teams tomorrow in #wikimedia-SM on IRC. Feel free to rebroadcast on social media and invite interested guests. The meeting will be at 11/11 19:00/7pm UTC (2pm Eastern Standard Time, 11am Pacific.) We hope to see you there! ⇒DanRosenthal Wikipedia Contribution Team 19:33, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ouija Board Criticism

[edit]

Thanks for the good work and excellent sourcing. It's much improved from it's former state as a narrowly focused occult/religious WP:POVFORK. I believe the material is now appropriate to merge into the main Ouija article. - LuckyLouie (talk) 22:50, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the thank you! There's more to come hopefully! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Although some may not be so happy about the improvements, I am. - LuckyLouie (talk) 23:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Panyd: I appreciate your enthusiastic effort in trying to upgrade this article. Certainly, there has been some improvement in the quality of the piece. However, it still faces the central problem of the article - it's an unneeded fork, as Ouija is not a problematically long article. If there is material of value in there - and there is some, but there is also still some of other kind, pile-on material of any critical mention of Ouija - then it belongs not in its own separate article (which was created seemingly simply to avoid the editors of Ouija, rather than out of legitimate need) but in the main article itself. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough! If I could get a nice merge out of it I would be happy. Thanking you again. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Panyd. You may want to lend your LexisNexis-like talents to the backlog on WP:FTN, particularly Jack Sarfatti which could use some reliable sources. Cheers, LuckyLouie (talk) 17:56, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing me in that direction! Looks like a lot of fun. I gave the Jack Sarfatti article a once over; using Lexis of course! Hope it helps. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re the Times, answered here. Well, I guess Sarfatti is quite controversial (to say the least) : ) so sourcing will have to be carefully evaluated. A good indicator is when multiple reliable sources agree on something. A fact found only in a single source may not be definitive. Thanks for pitching in. Cheers, LuckyLouie (talk) 23:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Vic Tandy

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Demon Cat

[edit]

Hi, took a quick look as discussed yesterday and tidied a citation. I see no issue with this one, plenty of independent sources and substantial enough to resist a merge any time soon. It looks like the List of demons has improved since I last looked at it (in fact it's been disambiguated) though I'm not sure that D.C. is a demon. It may be worth adding to List of legendary creatures by type. Cheers, Fæ (talk) 11:00, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking at it for me! Really appreciate it. And I have added! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 20:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

[edit]

Thanks...

[edit]

for the warm welcoming; yet I have to admit that I'am a little puzzled as to the alleged conflict of interest here. I'am unfortunately in no way connected to the European Union or any suborganisation thereof; if some of the additions to the named article do not mirror the truth, lack citation and or are written in a non neutral way, please name them and we will deliberate what to do. Lastly, I thank you for your offer of proofreading as I am often very prone to typos.

Thanks again

Regards Bryan de Bois Gilbert (talk) 14:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC) Bryan de Bois Gilbert[reply]

Hey there! Firstly, please be assured that it isn't an allegation, it's just a notice that you might have a conflict of interest. That is in no way saying that you do have a conflict of interest, and you have my sincerest apologies is that policy does not apply to you in this instance.
However, the language that you have inserted into the Maths-Bridge article is what appeared to be non-neutral, and we've had problems with editors with a conflict of interest editing the page before now. The problems specifically relate to the new section which doesn't have anything to do with the subject of the article, and the non-neutral language of your large additions, as well as the use of primary sources in the article, as opposed to reliable secondary sources.
I would suggest that you read WP:RS before adding any more information as well as have a look at WP:N. Similarly, why not try editing some articles which aren't Maths-Bridge? At the moment you are a WP:SPA, or single-purpose account which is another reason to believe you have a conflict of interest. There are many articles on Wikipedia which could use your assistance and we'd love to have you!
Similarly, could you please clarify what you mean by 'we' in your response? Happy editing. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:29, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
First things first: When I said 'we' would deliberate, I was refering to you and me; as you know I am new to all of this and thus was really believing, your friendly words and the offered help would be more than platitudes.
Secondly, you can keep the sarcasm out of this, it is not polite. We had one conversation and you are already comparing me with other users of this page and more sadly with other user, who edited the same page I edited.
Thirdly, calling the European Union an unreliable source is somehow strange. We are talking an still ongoing non-profit project financed by the EU to help upcoming students close their gaps in the field of maths and thus maby entitle them to a better future. I think every student in all of Europe who is planning on studying something that involves lots of math should know about this project and beef himself up.
Let us talk content. The new section I inserted, which has supposedly nothing to do with the subject, is in my opion the most important one, as it builds the premise as to why the project was started in the first place. Many drop-out, low level of knowledge leads to a pan-european program to make things better. As to non-neutral language: I'am describing socio-economic conditions as you would find them in many books on the subject, state a social fact which I backed up with the help of Eurostat and came to an inference to which I was about to add some more sources to back my point. It was an absolut valid deductive process without using words like catastrophic or so forth which contain value additions. So, I don't really see the problem here of non-neutral.
I will edit a lot more articles, but as the old saying goes "Finish what you start, than move on".
Look, I now get why you thought what ever it is you thought I was. So, let's start over new; cultivate a better understanding and a better tone of conversation in the future. Once again thanks for your (this time not quite as friendly) advice.

Regards Bryan de Bois Gilbert (talk) 15:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC) Bryan de Bois Gilbert[reply]

Sarcasm was not meant in my response in any way, shape of form and if any offense has been caused it was not intended. I sincerely meant what I said, including happy editing.
I wasn't referring to the EU when I mentioned about the sources which do not meet WP:RS, I was very specifically referring to the use of the maths-bridge website as a source as you have done in the Project Goals section.
I fully agree that the section you added has merit in giving context to the article but I think that this could be severely shortened, perhaps even down to one sentence, and that a section about an issue which is very complex and boderlines on WP:OR is not something we should be doing.
I would suggest that we move this discussion to the article's talk page, as this way more people will be able to access it and weigh in on the article itself.
One more note, I appreciate that you wish to finish what you have started before moving on to other projects, however, please do, as sentences such as: I think every student in all of Europe who is planning on studying something that involves lots of math should know about this project and beef himself up. - represent deep feelings regarding the subject and once again I must stress that if you have a COI (even as a fan of the project) this will intefer in your ability to be neutral, it's just human nature.
And please read WP:AGF. I hope I have assumed good faith of you, I would ask that you please do the same of me. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 15:23, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

talkback

[edit]
Hello, Panyd. You have new messages at VictorianMutant's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello! :) I saw you had made edits recently to John Travolta page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Travolta. I found something else that needs a correction on the page and I also wanted to make some suggestions for additions based on research:

What is listed on John Travolta's wiki page under "Singles": "Can't Let You Go" (1975)

Suggested change: "Can't Let You Go" (1977)

See link to album for confirmation: http://www.discogs.com/John-Travolta-Cant-Let-You-Go/master/153534

Suggested ADDITIONS to Singles section: "Take A Chance" (1983) #3 (duet with Olivia Newton-John) "Take A Chance" was a duet John Travolta recorded with Olivia Newton-John from Two Of A Kind http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olivia_Newton-John_discography http://www.billboard.com/album/olivia-newton-john/two-of-a-kind/92960#/album/olivia-newton-john/two-of-a-kind/92960

"Two Sleepy People" (1997) (duet w/Carly Simon)

(John Travolta recorded a duet with Carly Simon "Two Sleepy People" in 1997 http://www.amazon.com/Film-Noir-Carly-Simon/dp/B000002VTP)

I am new to Wikipedia and learning as I go. Thank you! Angilosi (talk) 01:14, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's great that you've found all of that information! However, I suggest that you take a chance and WP:BEBOLD and edit it yourself! If you need any help with this just let me know and I'll be happy to assist. If you get it wrong don't worry! That's what the revert button is for. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 01:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Ok :) for some reason I thought I couldn't because it is semi protected page. Angilosi (talk) 01:25, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution

[edit]

Hey Panyd. Could you take a look at Wikipedia:Contribution_Team/Backlogs? We're trying to make a big effort to reduce these for the rest of the month. Thanks! ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 20:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

[edit]

Thanks for the Email. ϢereSpielChequers 12:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • was this ready to go up? A user transcluded your RFA and it wasn't clear that they were acting on your behalf. Usually the candidate or the nominator transcludes a RFA (and does it properly too :-) ). I have undone the listing in case it wasn't ready but please feel free to revert me if I misread the situation. Spartaz Humbug! 18:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)Panyd, your RFA has been transcluded to the active list with no indication that this was actually what you intended. Should I undo it so you have more time to work on it, or are you ready now? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:58, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am definitely not ready yet! Still working on it. I will be soon though. Thank you guys for reverting it for me! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Panyd, The Utahraptor has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Good luck with your RfA. I hope it goes well. The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 22:54, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

[edit]

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 24 November 2010 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

[edit]

You should receive the first...

[edit]
The Great Backlog Drive Misc Barnstar
Great work with the banners and barnstars. —J04n(talk page) 00:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good answers

[edit]

Wished to congratulate you on the wonderful effort you've taken on answering each and every question on your RfA. It's rare to see such sincere effort. Best wishes and warm regards. Wifione ....... Leave a message 07:36, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! And thank you for your wonderfully contructive support vote. Means a lot that you took the time to write it. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 12:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Through it I found two small problems at User:Panyd/Testing5 that I felt I needed to address in this edit. If you disagree, please feel free to revert. Good luck with your RfA.   — Jeff G.  ツ 01:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Always happy for any help! Thank you. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 07:32, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GBD Invitation

[edit]

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors! Thank you for inviting us to participate in the Great Backlog Drive. I am pleased to let you know that the Guild has decided to support what we consider to be a very worthwhile project. On behalf of the Guild, I wish you all the very best with the drive. Cheers. – SMasters (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's absolutely fantastic news! Thank you so much. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 07:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hacket draft

[edit]

Hello there. I have just come across your William Hacket draft. How's it going? My interest right now is in John Udall (Puritan) which I created yesterday, given that there were some links between the Coppinger-Arthington-Hacket group and Udall's imprisonment. In fact Udall was appealing in 1591, and some sources say that the Hacket incident made it harder for Udall to make the case for his release. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually hoping to get my Hacket piece up to GA standard (which might be a little ambitious but hey!) so it's going a little slowly. There are at least two articles written on the man which could qualify as books in their own right. Anything you could send my way would be really appreciated though. It's such an involved yet insane plot! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 07:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You've decided to keep it as a draft in user space until it's GA? Not my way of working of course, but that still seems to be a slow way to develop an encyclopedia ... I've currently got sidetracked by Calais, and I shall probably go back to Wikisource shortly for much of my time. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:54, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Beat the 'crat congrats!

[edit]

It's only a few minutes now, so I doubt I'll jinx you by being the first. Over 100 supports and no (as yet) opposes! Very well done indeed... may your adminship be as smooth as your Rfa. Best wishes, always! Jusdafax 17:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now there's something you don't see every day

[edit]

...103 in unanimous support. It's been a long time since we had a WP:100 RfA without a single oppose. Congratulations and welcome to hellthe team! I'm sure you'll do a great job, but don't hesitate to ask if you need a hand. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 19:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA

[edit]
Here's your free T-shirt!

Panyd/Archive 3 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) My admin log

Congratulations!

It is my great pleasure to inform you that your Request for Adminship has
closed successfully and you are now an administrator!

Useful Links:
Administrators' reading list • Administrators' how-to guide • New admin school
Administrators' Noticeboard • Administrators' Noticeboard for Incidents
Administrators' Noticeboard for 3RR • Suspected sock puppets

Your admin logs:
blocks • deletions • moves • protects • uploads

Congratulations! (X! · talk)  · @863  ·  19:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

[edit]

Congratulations on becoming an administrator!

Wayne Olajuwon has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Mmm - Milk!
A tall, cool glass of milk just for you! Milk somehow promotes WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a glass of milk, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy!

WAYNEOLAJUWON 19:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Utahraptor has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Here's another cookie to go along with your milk. Congratulations! The UtahraptorTalk/Contribs 20:04, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Congratulations from me too. Feel free to raid my monobook for some useful admin scripts, and if you want we can spend a few minutes at the next London meetup in a fortnight going through a history merge or similar (or just have a celebratory bevvie). ϢereSpielChequers 20:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You want to teach her to do a histmerge over a beer? And, wow, that's a lot of food on this page! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
She could have eaten it for Thanksgiving, too! WAYNEOLAJUWON 21:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's a little late for thanksgiving, but I doubt she'll be hungry again this side of Christmas! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Airplaneman ✈ has given you a fresh piece of fried chicken! Pieces of fried chicken promote WikiLove and hopefully this piece has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a piping hot piece, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Bon appetit! Congratulations :). Airplaneman ✈ 20:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the tastiness of fried chicken by adding {{subst:GiveChicken}} to their talk page with a friendly message, or gobble up this chicken the giver's talk page with {{subst:MunchChicken}}!!

Congratulations! Now you get to go over your userpages and remove all those rollback topicons and userboxes saying "This user is not an administrator, but would like to be one someday". Good luck, and nice job on getting 100+ votes unopposed! Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:57, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations Panyd, don't delete the main page! ;) I'm sure you won't though. Regards, —Ancient Apparition • Champagne? • 9:56am • 22:56, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More congratulations

[edit]

As I'm on my mobile phone, the previous section is too large for me to edit, so I've got to start a new section!

They lied when they said it wasn't a trophy...here it is!
-- PhantomSteve.alt/talk\[alternate account of Phantomsteve] 20:51, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats!!!!! --j⚛e deckertalk 21:02, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Have fun with your new buttons. :) ~~ Hi878 (Come shout at me!) 21:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! ⇒SWATJester Son of the Defender 23:36, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Me too! Johnbod (talk) 01:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good job, congrats. Now go get to work! Courcelles 03:02, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am impressed. Congrats. Sven Manguard Talk 04:04, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! Catfish Jim & the soapdish 21:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All the best...Modernist (talk) 23:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Very well done, Panyd. I'm delighted. SpitfireTally-ho! 00:23, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking the time out to say 'thanks.' You are most welcome. As the RfA went along, you increasingly impressed me. Best of luck to you in your new incarnation. MarmadukePercy (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, I'm sure you will wield the mop with dignity and grace, now on to the round up. —J04n(talk page) 01:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks, and stop by my talk page any time. Congrats and good luck! Jujutacular talk 01:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! Kudpung (talk) 03:23, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations and thanks for the personal message. In response to it, my comment meant to express support of the principle on which Sandstein opposed, rather than expressing me feeling unable to oppose, which I had no desire to do. My wording may not have clearly expressed that. In any sense, I have absolutely no doubt whatsoever that you'll do well, nor have I any fears about your adminship. Your whole RfA expressed that there's no need to. As I said, if one more support would have made a difference I would have gladly given it. Expressing a concern that I had was simply more important to me than uselessly piling on. Best regards, Swarm X 23:20, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

[edit]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Panyd. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page.
Message added 22:57, 29 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

-- HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:57, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

[edit]

No problemo. Put your brooms to good use and slap the vandals. :) — Legolas (talk2me) 03:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thank you!

[edit]

You're welcome and congratulations! =) Bejinhan talks 04:00, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was happy to support: I'm sure you'll do well. Best. Acalamari (from Bellatrix Kerrigan) 11:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the kittens, and congratulations for your successful RfA. I'm also happy that you decided to remove the userbox. Regards,  Sandstein  17:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations! Regent of the Seatopians (talk) 03:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats :-)

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Panyd/Archive_3&oldid=1088328083"