The Heartland Institute

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Heartland Institute)
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with the institute of the same name affiliated with the Heartland Film Festival.
The Heartland Institute
Founder(s) David Padden
Focus public policy
Key people President and CEO: Joseph L. Bast
Chairman: Herbert J. Walberg
Budget Revenue: $4,783,310[1]
Expenses: $4,422,355
(FYE December 2013)
Slogan Ideas that Empower People
Location One South Wacker
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Website heartland.org

The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank founded in 1984 and based in Chicago. The Institute conducts advocacy work on issues including government spending, taxation, healthcare, education, tobacco policy, global warming, hydraulic fracturing, information technology, and free-market environmentalism.

The Heartland Institute is the primary American supporter of climate change denial.[2][3][4] It regularly rejects the scientific consensus that global warming poses a significant danger to the planet[5] and that human activity is driving it,[6] and claims that policies to fight it would be damaging to the economy.[7]

History[edit]

The Heartland Institute was founded in 1984 by Chicago investor David H. Padden, its chairman until 1995. Padden had been a founding director of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank headquartered in Washington, D.C., since its founding as the Charles Koch Foundation in 1974.[8][9][10] Padden was also a former director of the Citizens for a Sound Economy, the Acton Institute, the Foundation for Economic Education, and the Center for Libertarian Studies.[9][10]

At age 26, Joseph L. Bast was Heartland's first employee, and is Heartland's first and only president and chief executive officer. Bast's wife Diane is Heartland's publications director.[11][12]

In its early years, Heartland Institute focused on policies relevant to the Midwestern United States. Since 1993 it has focused on reaching elected officials and opinion leaders in all 50 states.

In the 1990s, Heartland worked with the tobacco company Philip Morris to question serious cancer risks to secondhand smoke, and to lobby against government public-health reforms. Starting in 2008, Heartland has organized conferences to criticize the scientific opinion of global warming.

After the election of US President Barack Obama, the Heartland Institute took advantage of the growth of the Tea Party movement, according to the Heartland's director of communications: "The support of the Tea Party groups across the country has been extremely valuable,” he said, reflecting on the Heartland's history at their sixth International Conference on Climate Change in 2011.[13] Heartland was among the organizers of the September 2009 Tea Party protest march, The Taxpayer March on Washington.[14][15] In support of the Tea Party movement, Heartland offered "free literature and other assistance to Tea Party activists,"[16][17] created a website "www.teapartytoolbox.org", and distributed a free book, The Patriot's Toolbox.[18][19][20]

Heartland says it has a full-time staff of 29, including editors and senior fellows,[21] as well as 222 unpaid policy advisors.[22] As of 2015, Heartland Institute's board of directors included Bast, Chicago real estate property manager Robert Buford,[23] Texas lobbyist Jeff Judson,[24] investment fund manager Brian D. Singer,[25][26] and Dan Hales.[27] Heartland files with Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity [21][28] and reported revenues of $4.8 million in 2013.[29]

Policy positions[edit]

The Heartland Institute promotes climate change denial, advocates for smoker's rights, for the privatization of public resources including school privatization, for school vouchers, for lower taxes and against subsidies and tax credits for individual businesses, and against an expanded federal role in health care, among other issues.

According to The Heartland Institute, it advocates free market policies.[30] The policy orientation of Heartland has been described as conservative, libertarian, and right wing.[12][31][32][33]

In addition to lobbying activities, Heartland hosts an internet application called "Policybot"[34] which serves as a clearinghouse for research from conservative think tanks such as the Heritage Foundation, the American Legislative Exchange Council, and the libertarian Cato Institute.

According to the 2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report (Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania), Heartland is number 69 (of 70) of "Think Tanks with the Most Significant Impact on Public Policy".[35]

Smoking[edit]

Heartland has long questioned the links between tobacco smoking, secondhand smoke, and lung cancer and the social costs imposed by smokers.[36] One of Heartland’s first and most prominent campaigns was against tobacco regulation.[5]

During the 1990s the Heartland Institute worked with tobacco company Philip Morris to question the links between smoking, secondhand smoke and health risks. Philip Morris commissioned Heartland to write and distribute reports. Heartland published a "policy study" which summarized a jointly prepared report by the Association of Private Enterprise Education and Philip Morris. The Heartland Institute also undertook a variety of other activities on behalf of the tobacco industry, including meeting with legislators, holding "off-the-record" briefings, and producing op-eds, radio interviews, and letters.[37]:233-234 A 1993 internal "Five Year Plan" from Philip Morris to address environmental tobacco smoke regulation called for support for the efforts of the Heartland Institute.[38][39] In 1996 Heartland president and chief executive officer Joe Bast wrote an essay entitled "Joe Camel is Innocent!,"[5][38] which said that contributions from the tobacco industry to Republican political campaigns were most likely because Republicans "have been leading the fight against the use of 'junk science' by the Food and Drug Administration and its evil twin, the Environmental Protection Agency."[40] In the "President's Letter" in the July 1998 issue of The Heartlander, the Heartland Institute's magazine, Blast wrote an essay "Five Lies about Tobacco",[5][38] which said "smoking in moderation has few, if any, adverse health effects."[41][42] In 1999 Blast referenced the essays in soliciting financial support from Philip Morris, writing "Heartland does many things that benefit Philip Morris' bottom line, things that no other organization does."[38] A Philip Morris executive, the firm's manager of industrial affairs, was a member of the board of directors of the Heartland Institute.[38]

In 2005, the Heartland Institute opposed Chicago's public smoking ban, one of the strictest bans in the country.[43]

In 2006, the Heartland Institute published Please Don't Poop in My Salad: And Other Essays Against the War on Smoking, an anthology of essays written over the 1990s and 2000s that broadly defends smokers.[44]

Global warming[edit]

The Heartland Institute disagrees with the scientific consensus on climate change, but does not dispute that climate change itself is occurring. Rather, it claims that human activities are not driving climate change,[citation needed] the amount of climate change is not catastrophic, and might be beneficial,[45][46] and that the economic costs of trying to mitigate climate change exceed the benefits.[citation needed] According to the New York Times, Heartland is "the primary American organization pushing climate change skepticism."[47] Heartland uses a characterization from the The Economist, "the world’s most prominent think tank promoting skepticism about man-made climate change” as a banner on the main page of the environmental section of their website.[48][49] In their 2010 book Merchants of Doubt, Naomi Oreskes and Erik M. Conway wrote that the Heartland Institute was known "for its persistent questioning of climate science, for its promotion of 'experts' who have done little, if any, peer-reviewed climate research, and for its sponsorship of a conference in New York City in 2008 alleging that the scientific community's work on global warming is fake."[37]:233 The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society in a chapter "Organized Climate Change Denial" identified Heartland as a conservative think tank with a strong interest in environmental and climate issues involved in climate change denial.[50]:149 Heartland "emerged as a leading force in climate change denial" in the decade 2003-2013, according to sociology professor Riley Dunlap of Oklahoma State University and political science professor Peter J. Jacques of the University of Central Florida.[51] Heartland Institute staff "recognize that climate change is a profound threat to our economic and social systems and therefore deny its scientific reality," wrote Naomi Klein in This Changes Everything.[52]:211

Fred Singer is the director of Heartland's Science and Environmental Policy Project,[53][54] and Heartland is a member organization of the Cooler Heads Coalition.[55][50]:151

The Institute has engaged in a number of actions in support of this policy- some of which have been highly controversial - as described below in § Actions on global warming.

Budgetary[edit]

The Heartland Institute is a critic of current federal, state, and local budgets and tax codes. Several of Heartland Institute's budgetary views include privatization of federal services to a competitive marketplace, changing the tax code to a more simplified version of the current code, and implementing Taxpayer Savings Grants.[citation needed]

In 1987 the Heartland Institute advocated for tenant ownership of the Chicago Housing Authority's Cabrini-Green Homes public housing complex through a cooperative or condominium conversion.[56]

In 1990 the Heartland Institute advocated for lower taxes in Illinois to foster job growth.[57]

The Institute advocated for the privatization of Illinois' toll highway system in 1999 and 2000.[58][59]

In 2008 the Institute opposed state subsidies and tax credits for local film productions, saying the economic benefits are less than the incentives.[60]

Education[edit]

The Heartland Institute supports the availability of charter schools, providing education tax credits to attend private schools, expanding federal vouchers for low-income students to attend a public or private school of their family's choosing, and the Parent Trigger reform that started in California. The Institute supports the introduction of market reforms into the public education system to increase competition and provide more options and greater choice for parents and their children.[61]

In 1994 the Heartland Institute criticized the Chicago Public Schools' reform efforts and advocated privatization of public schools and school vouchers.[62]

In 2014 the Institute published Rewards: How to use rewards to help children learn - and why teachers don't use them well co-authored by Heartland president Joseph Bast, which argued that the public education system should embrace incentives and rewards to spur student achievement.[63][64]

Healthcare[edit]

The Heartland Institute advocates for free-market reforms in healthcare and opposes federal control over the healthcare industry. Heartland supports Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), replacing federal tax deductions for employer-based healthcare with a refundable tax credit to allow individual choice over health insurance, removing state and Federal healthcare regulations aimed at providers and consumers of healthcare, and reducing litigation costs which are associated with malpractice suits.[65]

In 2010 Heartland published the book, The Obamacare Disaster, by Peter Ferrara, which opposed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.[66]

In 2015 the Institute filed an amicus curiae brief in in support of the petitioner in King v. Burwell, a Supreme Court case challenging income tax subsidies to those who enroll in health insurance under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act via the federal as opposed to the state health insurance exchanges.[67][68]

Hydraulic fracturing[edit]

The Heartland Institute advocates for hydraulic fracturing, a well-stimulation technique in which rock is fractured by pressurized liquid composed of water, sand, and chemicals.[69] Heartland published essays in support of hydraulic fracturing in the Chicago Tribune,[70] the New York Post,[71] The Hill,[72] Crain's Chicago Business,[73] and others. On March 20, 2015, Heartland's science director defended hydraulic fracturing on the Your World With Neil Cavuto program on Fox News.[74][75]

Actions on global warming[edit]

September 2007 scientists said to doubt global warming[edit]

In 2008 a bibliography written by Dennis T. Avery was posted on Heartland’s Web site, titled "500 Scientists with Documented Doubts of Man-Made Global Warming Scares”.[76][77] In late April 2008, Heartland reported that the web site DeSmogBlog had "targeted The Heartland Institute in late April 2008, and in particular two lists posted on Heartland’s Web site of scientists whose published work contradicts some of the main tenets of global warming alarmism."[77] The Sydney Morning Herald reported that the work of Jim Salinger, chief scientist at New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, was "misrepresented" as part of a "denial campaign".[78] In response to criticism, The Heartland Institute changed the title of the list to “500 Scientists Whose Research Contradicts Man-Made Global Warming Scares.”[77] Heartland did not remove any scientist's name from the list.[77][78] Avery explained, "Not all of these researchers would describe themselves as global warming skeptics"..."but the evidence in their studies is there for all to see.”[77][nb 1] Their "reply to critics" page states, "Heartland posted a bibliography of peer-reviewed articles, originally produced by Avery for the Hudson Institute, that question one or more of the fundamental assumptions of the global warming alarmists e.g., whether the Medieval Warm Period was global, whether it was warmer than the second half of the 20th century, etc." and concludes, "The important point at the base of this controversy is that the published work of many scientists, even those who publicly support the alarmist position in the global warming debate, supports the view that most or all of the modern warming is due to natural causes."[30]

Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change and Climate Change Reconsidered[edit]

Since 2008, Heartland has published the work of the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), an international group of scientists who analyze the work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other published, peer-reviewed studies that relate to climate change.[79] The aggregated work of the NIPCC is known as "Climate Change Reconsidered" and concludes, in contradiction to the IPCC, that human emissions will not lead to dangerous global warming and climate change.[80]

International Conferences on Climate Change[edit]

Between 2008 and 2014 the Heartland Institute organized nine International Conferences on Climate Change, bringing together hundreds of global warming skeptics.[81][82] Conference speakers have included Richard Lindzen, a professor of meteorology at MIT; Roy Spencer, a research scientist and climatologist at the University of Alabama in Huntsville; S. Fred Singer, a senior fellow of the Heartland Institute[83] and who was founding dean of the School of Environmental and Planetary Sciences at the University of Miami and founding director of the National Weather Satellite Service; Harrison Schmitt, a geologist and former NASA astronaut and Apollo 17 moonwalker; Dr. John Theon, atmospheric scientist and former NASA supervisor; and Wei-Hock "Willie" Soon, a part-time employee of the Solar and Stellar Physics (SSP) Division of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.[84] In the first conference, participants criticized the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and Al Gore.[85][86] The BBC reported that the heavily politicized nature of the Heartland conferences led some "moderate" climate skeptics to avoid them.[87] The 7th International Conference was the main subject of the October 2012 documentary, Climate of Doubt, by Frontline, a public television series of original, in-depth documentaries.[88] Heartland's international climate change conference is "the premier gathering for those dedicated to denying the overwhelming scientific consensus that human activity is warming the planet," according to The Nation.[89]

At the conclusion of the 7th International Conference (2012), Heartland president Joseph Bast announced that the organization might discontinue the conferences.[90] The eighth conference was held in Munich, Germany on 30 November and 1 December 2012.[91] The ninth conference was held during July of 2014 in Las Vegas, Nevada.[5][92] The tenth conference is scheduled for June 11-12, 2015 in Washington D.C..[93]

February 2012 document misappropriation[edit]

In February 2012, Peter Gleick, an environmental scientist and president of the non-profit research institute the Pacific Institute anonymously released information supposedly from a Heartland insider related to the inner workings of the think-tank. When identified on February 21, 2012, the day after Gleick's explanation and apology ran in The Huffington Post, by Steve Mosher[who?] and others[who?] as the likely individual behind the release in a piece by Megan McArdle in The Atlantic,[94] and probable author, an assessment McArdle based on comments on blog posts that the "Climate Strategy" memo was a scan to PDF, which the day before Gleick admitted he had done after receiving the "Climate Strategy" memo via mail,[95] of a two-page document titled "Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy." On February 20, 2012, writing in The Huffington Post, Gleick said he did not know the source of the "Climate Strategy" memo.[95] Gleick said he received the "Climate Strategy" memo[96] via the mail from an anonymous source then obtained more than a hundred pages of internal documents from the Heartland Institute by impersonating a Heartland Institute board member.[95] Gleick said he did not alter the documents in any way.[95] Gleick said he sent the documents to "journalists and experts working on climate issues."[95]

The documents were first published by the environmental watchdog website DeSmogBlog on February 14, 2012.[97] The documents included the "Climate Strategy" memo, a fund-raising plan, board of directors meeting minutes, and the 2012 budget.[98] Donors to the Heartland Institute disclosed included the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, Microsoft, General Motors, Comcast, tobacco companies Reynolds American and Philip Morris (now Altria), drug firms Amgen, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Eli Lilly, liquor companies, and an anonymous donor who had given $13 million over the past five years. The documents contained details of payments to support climate skeptics and their programs, namely the founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change Craig Idso ($11,600 per month), physicist Fred Singer ($5,000 plus expenses per month), geologist Robert M. Carter ($1,667 per month) and $90,000 to blogger and former meteorologist Anthony Watts. The documents also revealed the Heartland Institute's plan to develop curriculum materials to be provided to teachers in the United States to promote climate skepticism, plans confirmed by the Associated Press.[99][100][101][102][103][104] The documents also disclosed Heartland's $612,000 plan to support Wisconsin Act 10 and to influence the Wisconsin's recall elections called "Operation Angry Badger."[102][105] Carter and Watts confirmed receiving payments.[100]

Heartland said that the documents were fraudulently acquired and that the "Climate Strategy" memo was forged to defame and discredit the Heartland Institute.[102][106][107][108] On February 20, 2012, writing in The Huffington Post, Peter Gleick, an environmental scientist and president of the non-profit research institute the Pacific Institute, said he received the "Climate Strategy" memo via the mail from an anonymous source and then obtained the rest of the documents from the Heartland Institute by impersonating a Heartland Institute board member.[95] A computer forensics report commissioned by Heartland concluded that "the Memo did not originate on the Heartland System...and was never present there."[109][110] A stylometry analysis of the memo by writer Shawn Lawrence Otto in the Huffington Post concluded Heartland president Joe Bast was the most likely author.[111] The Daily Telegraph columnist James Delingpole dubbed the controversy over the memo "Fakegate."[112] Gleick's actions "shocked the scientific community, concerned funders of the Pacific Institute and tarnished his reputation," according to San Jose Mercury News.[113] Several environmental organizations called on General Motors and Microsoft to sever their ties with Heartland. Climate scientists called on Heartland to "recognise how its attacks on science and scientists have poisoned the debate about climate change policy."[32]

The Pacific Institute granted Gleick's request for a short-term leave of absence.[114] On February 16, Gleick resigned as chair of American Geophysical Union's Task Force on Scientific Ethics.[115][116] On February 20, Gleick apologized for his actions, saying "My judgement was blinded by my frustration with the ongoing efforts – often anonymous, well-funded, and coordinated – to attack climate science and scientists and prevent this debate, and by the lack of transparency of the organizations involved."[95][117] The Pacific Institute said that an independent inquiry conducted for the Institute had confirmed Gleick's account of events. The board of directors of the Pacific Institute accepted Gleick's apology. The Heartland Institute called Gleick's reinstatement a "whitewash."[118][119]

On February 22, 2012, Congressman Raúl Grijalva of Arizona requested a House Committee on Natural Resources hearing to investigate whether alleged payments, revealed in the documents, from the Heartland Institute to Indur Goklany, a senior US Department of the Interior employee, violated federal ethics rules. The environmental organization Greenpeace requested a Department of the Interior investigation.[120] Golklany told Politico he had previously cleared his activities with his department's ethics unit. On February 28, 2012, the Committee announced that it was planning to ignore Congressman Grijalva's request.[121]

May 2012 billboard campaign[edit]

On May 4, 2012, the institute launched a digital billboard advertisement campaign in the Chicago area featuring a photo of Ted Kaczynski, the "Unabomber" whose mail bombs killed three people and injured 23 others, and asking the question, “I still believe in global warming, do you?”[122][123] The Institute planned for the campaign to feature murderer Charles Manson, communist leader Fidel Castro and perhaps Osama bin Laden, asking the same question. In a statement, the institute justified the billboards saying "the most prominent advocates of global warming aren’t scientists. They are murderers, tyrants, and madmen."[124]

The billboard reportedly "unleashed a social media-fed campaign, including a petition from the advocacy group Forecast the Facts calling on Heartland’s corporate backers to immediately pull their funding," and prompted Rep. James Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis.) to threaten to cancel his speech at the upcoming seventh International Conference on Climate Change organized by Heartland.[125] (Sensenbrenner ultimately did speak at the conference.)[126] Within 24 hours Heartland cancelled the campaign, although its President refused to apologize for it.[nb 2] The advertising campaign led to the resignation of two of the Institute's 12 board members,[127] and the resignation of almost the entire Heartland Washington D.C. office, taking the Institute's biggest project (on insurance) with it.[128] The staff of the former Heartland insurance project founded the R Street Institute and announced they "will not promote climate change skepticism."[129]

Following the 2012 document leak and the controversial billboard campaign, substantial funding was lost as corporate donors, including the General Motors Foundation, sought to dissociate themselves from the Institute. According to the advocacy group Forecast the Facts, Heartland lost more than $825,000, or one third of planned corporate fundraising for the year. The shortfall led to sponsorship of the Institute's May 2012 climate conference by Illinois' coal lobby, the Illinois Coal Association, the Institute's "first publicly acknowledged donations from the coal industry," and the Heritage Foundation.[128] The billboard controversy led to the loss of substantial corporate funding, including telecommunications firm AT&T, financial service firm BB&T, alcoholic beverage company Diageo and about two dozen insurance companies, including State Farm and the United Services Automobile Association.[130][131][132][133] Pharmaceutical companies Amgen, Eli Lilly, Bayer and GlaxoSmithKline ended financial support.[134] Heartland's May, 2012 climate conference was smaller than previous years.[90]

October 2012 repeal of mandates on renewable energy[edit]

The Heartland Institute wrote model legislation to repeal mandates on renewable energy, such as solar and wind power, and presented the model legislation to the American Legislative Exchange Council, a nonprofit organization of conservative state legislators and private sector representatives that drafts and shares model state-level legislation for distribution among state governments in the United States. The Council's board of directors adopted the model legislation in October 2012.[135]

June 2013 Chinese Academy of Sciences[edit]

In 2013, the Chinese Academy of Sciences published a report from the Heartland Institute in order to better understand the public debate and encourage discussion of other views.[136] The preface included a disclaimer that the academy did not endorse the views in the report, but in June, the Heartland Institute falsely announced that the Chinese Academy of Sciences supported their views, and claimed the publication placed significant scientific weight against climate change.[137][138] The Chinese Academy of Sciences, responding to the announcement, said "The claim of the Heartland Institute about CAS’ endorsement of its report is completely false," clarified that they did not endorse the views of the Heartland Institute, and asked for a retraction.[136][139]

April 2015 Vatican Council on climate change[edit]

On 28 April 2015 the Catholic Church convened a council to discuss the religious implications of global warming. Held at The Vatican and hosted by the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Sciences, it was attended by the Secretary-General of the United Nations, as well as national presidents, CEOs, academics, scientists, and representatives of the world's major religions. After the council ended, a representative (Marc Morano) from the Heartland Institute broke into a press briefing being given by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who was reporting on his meeting with the Pope. He interrupted the Secretary-Genral and the moderator, asking that global-warming skeptics being allowed to speak. After a few minutes, he was escorted from the premises by Vatican officials.[140]

Funding[edit]

The Heartland Institute does not disclose its funding sources. According to its brochures, Heartland receives money from approximately 5,000 individuals and organizations, and no single corporate entity donates more than 5% of the operating budget,[141] although the figure for individual donors can be much higher, with a single anonymous donor providing $4.6 million in 2008, and $979,000 in 2011, accounting for 20% of Heartland's overall budget, according to reports of a leaked fundraising plan.[103] Heartland states that it does not accept government funds and does not conduct contract research for special-interest groups.[142]

MediaTransparency reported that Heartland received funding from politically conservative foundations such as the Castle Rock Foundation, the Sarah Scaife Foundation, the John M. Olin Foundation, and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation.[143] Between 2002 and 2010, Donors Trust, a conservative donor advised fund, granted $13.5 million to the Heartland Institute.[144] In 2011 the Institute received $25,000 from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation.[102] The Charles Koch Foundation states that the contribution was "$25,000 to the Heartland Institute in 2011 for research in healthcare, not climate change, and this was the first and only donation the Foundation made to the institute in more than a decade".[145]

Oil and gas companies have contributed to the Heartland Institute, including $736,500 from ExxonMobil between 1998 and 2005.[146][135] Greenpeace reported that Heartland received almost $800,000 from ExxonMobil.[78] In 2008, ExxonMobil said that it would stop funding to groups skeptical of climate warming, including Heartland.[146][147][148] Joseph Bast, president of the Heartland Institute, argued that ExxonMobil was simply distancing itself from Heartland out of concern for its public image.[146]

The Heartland Institute has also received funding and support from tobacco companies Philip Morris,[37]:234 Altria and Reynolds American, and pharmaceutical industry firms GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer and Eli Lilly.[103] State Farm Insurance, USAA and Diageo are former supporters.[149] The Independent reported that Heartland's receipt of donations from Exxon and Philip Morris indicates a "direct link"..."between anti-global warming sceptics funded by the oil industry and the opponents of the scientific evidence showing that passive smoking can damage people's health."[85] Currently the Heartland Institutes opposes legislation on passive smoking as infringing on personal liberty and the rights of owners of bars and other establishments.[150]

As of 2006, the Walton Family Foundation had contributed approximately $300,000 to Heartland. The Institute published an op-ed in the Louisville Courier-Journal defending Wal-Mart against criticism over its treatment of workers. The Walton Family Foundation donations were not disclosed in the op-ed, and the editor of the Courier-Journal stated that he was unaware of the connection and would probably not have published the op-ed had he known of it.[151] The St. Petersburg Times described the Heartland Institute as "particularly energetic defending Wal-Mart."[151] Heartland has stated that its authors were not "paid to defend Wal-Mart" and did not receive funding from the corporation; it did not disclose the $300,000+ received from the Walton Family Foundation.[151]

In 2012 a large number of sponsors withdrew funding due to the leak of their climate change strategy and the controversy over their billboard campaign. The institute lost an estimated $825,000, or one third of planned corporate fundraising for the year.[128]

Periodicals[edit]

The Heartland Institute publishes four monthly public policy newspapers aimed at state legislators:

Books[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ Heartland’s president, Joseph Bast, wrote "They have no right – legally or ethically – to demand that their names be removed from a bibliography composed by researchers with whom they disagree. Their names probably appear in hundreds or thousands of bibliographies accompanying other articles or in books with which they disagree. Do they plan to sue hundreds or thousands of their colleagues? The proper response is to engage in scholarly debate, not demand imperiously that the other side redact its publications."[77]
  2. ^ President Joseph Bast issued a statement saying: "We know that our billboard angered and disappointed many of Heartland’s friends and supporters, but we hope they understand what we were trying to do with this experiment. We do not apologize for running the ad, and we will continue to experiment with ways to communicate the ‘realist’ message on the climate."[125]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "The Heartland Institute" (PDF). Foundation Center. Retrieved 16 April 2015. 
  2. ^ Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Routledge. 2010. p. 256. ISBN 1135998507. The Heartland Institute, a leading think-tank promoting climate change denial... 
  3. ^ Michael Mann (2013). The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines. Columbia University Press. p. 64. ISBN 0231152558. Many organizations have settled in the Potemkin village of climate change denial. Among them are the American Enterprise Institute...Heartland Institute 
  4. ^ James Hoggan, Richard Littlemore (2009). Climate Cover-Up: The Crusade to Deny Global Warming. Greystone Books Ltd. p. 79. ISBN 1553654854. Similarly, the Heartland Institute, a small regional think tank in the 1990s, emerged as a leading force in climate change denial in the past decade 
  5. ^ a b c d e Streep, Abe (10 July 2014). "In Las Vegas, Climate Change Deniers Regroup, Vow to Keep Doubt Alive". Bloomberg News. Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  6. ^ "The Purloined Climate Papers". The Wall Street Journal Digital Network. 22 February 2012. Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  7. ^ Howard, Brian (1 July 2014). "8 Summer Miseries Made Worse by Global Warming, From Poison Ivy to Allergies". National Geographic. Retrieved 20 February 2015. 
  8. ^ Quirk, Trevor (February 16, 2012). "Explainer: What is the Heartland Institute?". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved April 3, 2015. 
  9. ^ a b Giangrasse Kates, Joan (October 6, 2011). "David H. Padden, 1927-2011; Businessman founded 2 national libertarian groups". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 3, 2015. 
  10. ^ a b Boaz, David (October 4, 2011). "David H. Padden, R.I.P.". Cato Institute. 
  11. ^ Tollefson, Jeff (July 27, 2011). "Climate-change politics: The sceptic meets his match". Nature 475 (7357): 440–441. doi:10.1038/475440a. Retrieved April 3, 2015. 
  12. ^ a b Mohr, Michele (January 8, 1995). "Back-yard Think Tanks: Heartland, Rockford Institutes Put Local Spin On National Issues". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 7, 2015. 
  13. ^ Dwyer, Joshua (December 7, 2011). "Heartland Institute continues to influence prominent legislators, citizens". Medill School of Journalism. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  14. ^ Pilkington, Ed (September 13, 2009). "Barack Obama denounced by rightwing marchers in Washington". The Guardian. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  15. ^ Lambro, Donald (September 8, 2009). "Tea Party Express roars to D.C.". The Washington Times. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  16. ^ Carol Bast, Diane (March 1, 2010). "The Heartlander: March-April 2010 (full text pdf)". The Heartland Institute. 
  17. ^ Carol Bast, Diane (March 1, 2010). "The Heartlander: March-April 2010 (full text)". The Heartland Institute. 
  18. ^ Bast, Joseph (October 1, 2010). "The Patriot's Toolbox". The Heartland Institute. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  19. ^ Domenech, Ben (October 20, 2010). "The Patriot’s Toolbox: Principles for What Comes". RedState. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  20. ^ Domenech, Ben (October 27, 2010). "The Patriot's Toolbox: Stock Up on Public Policy Ammunition". Breitbart. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  21. ^ a b "About". Heartland Institute. 
  22. ^ "Expert Search". heartland.org. 
  23. ^ "More Rahm Emanuel board appointments". Chicago Suntimes. 27 July 2011. Retrieved 18 April 2015. 
  24. ^ "Heartland Institute facing uncertain future as staff depart and cash dries up". The Guardian. 20 May 2012. Retrieved 18 April 2015. 
  25. ^ "Buy China, Avoid Latin America, Sell The Swiss Franc: Around The World With William Blair's Macro Maven". Forbes. 17 April 2015. Retrieved 18 April 2015. 
  26. ^ "Board of Directors". The Heartland Institute. Retrieved 17 April 2015. 
  27. ^ "For Heartland board, failed climate attack was a surprise". Environment & Energy Publishing. 11 May 2012. Retrieved 18 April 2015. 
  28. ^ "Heartland Institute". Nonprofit Explorer. ProPublica. Retrieved May 22, 2015. 
  29. ^ "2013 Form 990 Income Tax Return - The Heartland Institute" (PDF). Heartland Institute. Retrieved 30 December 2014. 
  30. ^ a b "About". heartland.org. 
  31. ^ It also has been described as right-wing. See, for example:
    • Pilkington, Ed (September 14, 2009). "Anti-Obama protesters march in Washington". The Irish Times. Retrieved September 3, 2010. They include right-wing think tanks such as the Heartland Institute... 
    • Connor, Steve (March 3, 2008). "Tobacco and oil pay for climate conference". The Independent. Retrieved September 2, 2010. The first international conference designed to question the scientific consensus on climate change is being sponsored by a right-wing American think-tank which receives money from the oil industry. 
    • Harrabin, Roger (May 21, 2010). "Climate sceptics rally to expose 'myth'". BBC. Retrieved September 3, 2010. At the world's biggest gathering of climate change sceptics, organised by the right-wing Heartland Institute... 
    • Harte, Julia (December 16, 2009). "Shooting the Messenger". Philadelphia City Paper. Retrieved September 5, 2010. Jay Lehr, science director at the right-wing Heartland Institute, concurs. 
  32. ^ a b Goldenberg, Suzanne (February 17, 2012). "Heartland Institute faces fresh scrutiny over tax status". The Guardian. Retrieved February 18, 2012. 
  33. ^ Roberts, Alasdair Scott, Blacked out: government secrecy in the information age, (2006) Cambridge University Press, p. 253, via GoogleBooks. ISBN 0-521-85870-4, ISBN 978-0-521-85870-0
  34. ^ "The Heartland Institute". enginez.com. 
  35. ^ James G. McGann (Director) (February 4, 2015). "2014 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report". Retrieved February 14, 2015.  Other "Top Think Tank" rankings include #28 (of 40) for "Best New Idea or Paradigm Developed by a Think Tank", #40 (of 60) for "Best Think Tank Network", #43 (of 60) for Best Use of Social Networks, and #19 (of 80) of "Think Tanks to Watch".
  36. ^ Tesler LE, Malone RE (July 2010). ""Our reach is wide by any corporate standard": how the tobacco industry helped defeat the Clinton health plan and why it matters now". American Journal of Public Health 100 (7): 1174–88. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.179150. PMC 2882403. PMID 20466958. 
  37. ^ a b c Oreskes, Naomi; Conway, Erik M (2010). Merchants of Doubt. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 9781608193943. 
  38. ^ a b c d e Dickinson, Tim (February 22, 2012). "Heartland Institute's Corporate Shilling Is Nothing New". Rolling Stone. Retrieved April 5, 2015. 
  39. ^ Hartmann, Thom (April 9, 2014). "The Climate Deniers Are Using the Same Tactics as the Tobacco Industry". Thom Hartmann Program. Retrieved April 5, 2015. 
  40. ^ Bast, Joseph L. (August 21, 1996). "Joe Camel Is Innocent!". Heartland Institute. Retrieved April 5, 2015. 
  41. ^ Bast, Joseph L. (July 1, 1998). "Five Lies about Tobacco; The Tobacco Bill Wasn't about Kids". Heartland Institute. Retrieved April 5, 2015. 
  42. ^ Bast, Joseph L. (July 1, 1998). "President's Letter: Five Lies about Tobacco; The Tobacco Bill Wasn't about Kids". Heartland Institute. Retrieved April 5, 2015. 
  43. ^ Masterson, Kathryn (July 12, 2005). "Public can sound off on smoking at hearing". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  44. ^ Bast, Joseph L (2006). Please Don't Poop in My Salad. Chicago: The Heartland Institute. ISBN 0978695909. Retrieved 22 January 2015. 
  45. ^ "Instant Expert Guide: Global Warming" (PDF). Heartland Institute. Archived from the original (PDF) on December 1, 2006. Retrieved March 4, 2008. 
  46. ^ Riley E. Dunlap; Aaron M. McCright (2010). "Climate change denial: source, actors and strategies". In Constance Lever-Tracy. Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Routledge. p. 256. 
  47. ^ Gillis, Justin (May 1, 2012). "Clouds’ Effect on Climate Change Is Last Bastion for Dissenters". New York Times. Retrieved May 1, 2012. 
  48. ^ "Center on Climate and Environmental Policy Heartland Institute". Heartland Institute. Retrieved May 20, 2015. 
  49. ^ "Climate scepticism; Toxic shock: A climate-change sceptic is melting". The Economist (The Economist Newspaper Limited). May 26, 2012. Retrieved March 2, 2015. 
  50. ^ a b Dryzek, John S.; Norgaard, Richard B.; Schlosberg, David (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199683420. 
  51. ^ Dunlap, Riley E.; Jacques, Peter J. (February 22, 2013). "Climate Change Denial Books and Conservative Think Tanks, Exploring the Connection". American Behavioral Scientist 57 (6): 699–731. doi:10.1177/0002764213477096. 
  52. ^ Klein, Naomi (2014). This Changes Everything. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9781451697384. 
  53. ^ "S. Fred Singer". Heartland Institute. 
  54. ^ Bagley, Katherine (September 19, 2013). "IPCC report: sceptic groups launch global anti-science campaign". The Guardian. Retrieved April 5, 2015. 
  55. ^ "About GlobalWarming.org". Cooler Heads Coalition. Retrieved August 22, 2008. 
  56. ^ Ziemba, Stanley (October 8, 1987). "Study Pushes Tenant Ownership Of Cabrini-Green". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  57. ^ Goozner, Merrill (March 5, 1990). "Group Maps Plan For Accelerated Illinois Growth". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  58. ^ Worthington, Rogers (December 3, 1999). "Illinois Tollway System Finds Ally; Public Policy Group Pushes New Options". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  59. ^ Hill, James (February 10, 2000). "Toll Chief Goes Public Against Privatization". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  60. ^ Nothdurft, John (December 1, 2008). newspaper=Chicago Tribune "Hollywood will not make Illinois rich". Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  61. ^ "Education | Heartland Institute". Heartland.org. Retrieved February 2, 2012. 
  62. ^ Heard, Jacquelyn (November 1, 1994). "Reform Lost In Schools, Report Says; Researchers Pin Blame On City, Teachers". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  63. ^ "Joseph Bast discuss his book, "Rewards: How to use rewards to help children learn..". Newsmax TV. 18 February 2015. Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  64. ^ "Rewards". Irish American News. Retrieved 24 February 2015. 
  65. ^ ""Health Care" on Heartland.org web page". Retrieved November 5, 2011. 
  66. ^ "The Obamacare Disaster". Amazon.com. Amazon. Retrieved 16 December 2014. 
  67. ^ vanden Heuvel, Katrina (March 2, 2015). "The Koch Cash Behind the Latest Attack on Obamacare". The Nation. Retrieved April 5, 2015. 
  68. ^ Keim, Jonathan (February 26, 2015). "The Busy Reader’s Guide to Amicus Briefs in King v. Burwell". National Review. Retrieved April 6, 2015. 
  69. ^ Smith, Taylor (June 7, 2012). "Research & Commentary: Hydraulic Fracturing Bans". Heartland Institute. Retrieved June 8, 2012. 
  70. ^ Smith, Taylor (January 15, 2013). "Hydraulic fracturing in Illinois". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  71. ^ Orr, Isaac (January 4, 2015). "Andrew Cuomo’s fracking psuedo-science". New York Post. Retrieved April 10, 2015. 
  72. ^ Orr, Isaac (September 3, 2014). "Fracking is not a threat". The Hill. Retrieved April 10, 2015. 
  73. ^ Orr, Isaac (November 6, 2014). "Is Illinois borrowing from New York's fracking playbook?". Retrieved April 10, 2015. 
  74. ^ "Your World With Neil Cavuto". Fox News. March 20, 2015. 
  75. ^ Robbins, Denise (March 24, 2015). "Fox's Cavuto, Heartland's Lehr In Denial About Fracking Pollution". Media Matters for America. Retrieved April 10, 2015. 
  76. ^ 500 Scientists Whose Research Contradicts Man-Made Global Warming Scares, by Dennis T. Avery. From the Heartland Institute website; published September 14, 2007, accessed June 20, 2008.
  77. ^ a b c d e f "Controversy Arises Over Lists of Scientists Whose Research Contradicts Man-Made Global Warming Scares" (Press release). Heartland Institute. May 5, 2008. Retrieved September 3, 2010. 
  78. ^ a b c McKnight, David (August 2, 2008). "The climate change smokescreen". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved December 28, 2009. 
  79. ^ Singer, Fred. "Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate". Heartland Institute. Retrieved 19 January 2015. 
  80. ^ Hertzberg, Dr. Martin. "Evaluation of "Climate Change Reconsidered II - Physical Science"". Principia Scientific. Retrieved 19 January 2015. 
  81. ^ Revkin, Andrew C. "Skeptics Dispute Climate Worries and Each Other". The New York Times. Retrieved 5 January 2015. 
  82. ^ Singer, Fred. "Climate Science Does Not Support IPCC Conclusions". The American Thinker. Retrieved 5 January 2015. 
  83. ^ "Climategate Heads to Court". American Thinker. Retrieved April 7, 2012. 
  84. ^ Harvey, Chelsea (February 25, 2015). "Leading skeptical climate scientist earned more than $1 million from the fossil-fuel industry". Business Insider. Retrieved March 5, 2015. 
  85. ^ a b Connor, Steve (March 3, 2008). "Tobacco and oil pay for climate conference". The Independent. Retrieved September 2, 2010. 
  86. ^ Revkin, Andrew (March 4, 2008). "Cool View of Science at Meeting on Warming". New York Times. Retrieved March 4, 2008. 
  87. ^ Harrabin, Roger (May 21, 2010). "Climate sceptics rally to expose 'myth'". BBC News Online. Retrieved September 3, 2010. 
  88. ^ Upin, Catherine; Hockenberry, John (October 23, 2012). "Climate of Doubt". Frontline (PBS). Retrieved March 4, 2015. 
  89. ^ Klein, Naomi (November 28, 2011). "Capitalism vs. the Climate". The Nation. Retrieved May 21, 2015. 
  90. ^ a b Goldenberg, Suzanne (May 23, 2012). "Heartland Institute in financial crisis after billboard controversy". The Guardian. 
  91. ^ "ICCC-8". International Conferences on Climate Change. The Heartland Institute. Retrieved 15 December 2014. 
  92. ^ "9th International Conference on Climate Change". heartland.org. 
  93. ^ "Tenth International Conference on Climate Change (ICCC-10)". Retrieved 4 February 2015. 
  94. ^ "Peter Gleick Confesses to Obtaining Heartland Documents Under False Pretenses". The Atlantic. 
  95. ^ a b c d e f g Gleick, Peter (February 20, 2015). "The Origin of the Heartland Documents". The Huffington Post. Retrieved May 21, 2015. 
  96. ^ "Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy" (PDF). DeSmogBlog. Retrieved 18 December 2014. 
  97. ^ DeMelle, Brendan (February 14, 2012). "Heartland Institute Exposed: Internal Documents Unmask Heart of Climate Denial Machine". DeSmogBlog. Retrieved May 20, 2015. 
  98. ^ "Heartland Institute documents published". UPI. February 18, 2012. Retrieved February 18, 2012. 
  99. ^ Goldenberg, Suzanne (February 15, 2012). "Leak exposes how Heartland Institute works to undermine climate science". The Guardian. Retrieved February 15, 2012. 
  100. ^ a b "Leaked: Conservative Group Plans Anti-Climate Education Program". Scientific American. Retrieved February 15, 2012. 
  101. ^ Pappas, Stephanie (February 15, 2012). "Documents reveal Koch-funded group's plot to undermine climate science". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved April 2, 2015. 
  102. ^ a b c d Gillis, Justin; Kaufman, Leslie (February 16, 2012). "Leak Offers Glimpse of Campaign Against Climate Science". New York Times. Retrieved April 2, 2015. 
  103. ^ a b c Goldenberg, Suzanne; Rushe, Dominic (February 16, 2012). "Climate science attack machine took donations from major corporations". The Guardian. Retrieved April 2, 2015. 
  104. ^ Borenstein, Seth (February 16, 2012). "INFLUENCE GAME: Leaks show group's climate efforts". The Boston Globe. Associated Press. Retrieved April 2, 2015. 
  105. ^ Glauber, Bill (February 16, 2012). "Leaked documents detail 'Operation Angry Badger'". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Retrieved April 3, 2015. 
  106. ^ Opinion: The Purloined Climate Papers. The Wall Street Journal. February 21, 2012. Retrieved April 2, 2015. 
  107. ^ Goldenberg, Suzanne (February 16, 2012). "Heartland Institute 'fights back' over publication of confidential documents". The Guardian. Retrieved February 18, 2012. 
  108. ^ Lakely, Jim. "Leaked: Heartland Institute Responds to Stolen and Fake Documents". Heartland Institute. Retrieved February 24, 2012. 
  109. ^ "The Heartland Institute Investigative Report" (PDF). Heartland Institute. Heartland Institute. Retrieved 22 December 2014. 
  110. ^ Kukec, Anna Marie (15 March 2013). "Suburban computer forensics team sifts through scams". The Daily Herald. Retrieved 22 December 2014. 
  111. ^ Otto, Shawn Lawrence. "The Most Likely Author of the secret Heartland Institute Climate Strategy Memo, According to JGAAP?". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 18 December 2014. 
  112. ^ Delingpole, James (16 February 2012). "Fakegate". The Daily Telegraph (Telegraph Media Group Ltd.). Retrieved 22 December 2014. 
  113. ^ Hull, Dana. "Peter Gleick requests short-term leave of absence from Oakland's Pacific Institute". The San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved 7 January 2015. 
  114. ^ Hull, Dana (February 24, 2012). "Peter Gleick requests short-term leave of absence from Oakland's Pacific Institute". San Jose Mercury News. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  115. ^ American Geophysical Union, February 21, 2012, AGU Encourages Integrity in all Aspects of Climate Change Discourse
  116. ^ Spotts, Pete (February 21, 2012). "Climategate sequel? Scientist lies to get Heartland Institute documents". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved April 2, 2015. 
  117. ^ Marder, Jenny (February 21, 2012). "Climate Expert Assumed False Identity to Obtain Documents". PBS NewsHour (PBS). Retrieved April 2, 2015. 
  118. ^ Barringer, Felicity (June 8, 2012). "Scientist Is Reinstated After Deceit". New York Times. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  119. ^ Harrison, Laird (February 23, 2012). "Peter Gleick, Climate Scientist, Investigated After Heartland Leak". The Huffington Post. Reuters. Retrieved April 2, 2015. 
  120. ^ Sheppard, Kate (February 22, 2012). "Heartland Docs Indicate It Paid Gov't Scientist for Work". Mother Jones. Retrieved April 6, 2015. 
  121. ^ Howley, Patrick, "Grijalva’s Climate Witch Hunt", The Washington Free Beacon, February 28, 2012.
  122. ^ Koch, Wendy (May 4, 2012). "Climate wars heat up with pulled Unabomber billboards". USA Today. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  123. ^ Haggerty, Ryan; Ford, Liam (May 5, 2012). "Group provokes reaction with billboard doubting global warming". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  124. ^ Samenow, Jason (May 4, 2012). "Heartland Institute launches campaign linking terrorism, murder, and global warming belief". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 1, 2015. 
  125. ^ a b Geman, Ben (May 5, 2012). "Heartland Institute yanks Unabomber climate billboard". The Hill. Retrieved May 5, 2012. 
  126. ^ "Jim Sensenbrenner, ICCC7, May 22, 2012". Heartland Institute. Retrieved 30 December 2014. 
  127. ^ Bast, Joe. "Heartland Replies to the Economist". Somewhat Reasonable. The Heartland Institute. Retrieved 15 December 2014. 
  128. ^ a b c Goldenberg, Suzanne, "Heartland Institute facing uncertain future as staff depart and cash dries up", guardian.co.uk, May 20, 2012.
  129. ^ Weigel, David (May 14, 2012). "Climate Change Believers Split from Heartland Institute". Slate. Retrieved April 7, 2015. 
  130. ^ Goldenberg, Suzanne (May 9, 2012). "Big donors ditch rightwing Heartland Institute over Unabomber billboard". The Guardian. Retrieved May 23, 2012. 
  131. ^ Kuipers, Dean (May 9, 2012). "Unabomber billboard continues to hurt Heartland Institute". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved April 6, 2015. 
  132. ^ Felsenthal, Carol (June 14, 2012). "Chicago’s Heartland Institute, the Group Behind the Unabomber Billboard". Chicago (magazine). Retrieved April 7, 2015. 
  133. ^ Graves, Lucia (May 9, 2012). "Heartland Stands By Its Climate Change Denial As Donors Jump Ship". The Huffington Post. Retrieved April 7, 2015. 
  134. ^ "Amgen cuts funding to the Heartland Institute". Ventura County Star. June 18, 2012. Retrieved April 4, 2015. 
  135. ^ a b Eilperin, Juliet (November 24, 2012). "Climate skeptic group works to reverse renewable energy mandates". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 9, 2015. 
  136. ^ a b Lewandowsky, Stephan (15 June 2013). "Ethics Lost in Translation". Shaping Tomorrows Worls. 
  137. ^ Nuccitelli, Dana (June 14, 2013). "The Heartland Institute's skeptical Chinese fantasy". The Guardian. 
  138. ^ Nesbit, Jeff (June 24, 2013). "The Chinese Academies of Science incident – It's been an interesting couple of weeks for the deny-the-science policy crowd". U.S. News & World Report. 
  139. ^ "The Statements on the Chinese Translation of the "Climate Change Reconsidered—NIPCC Report"". The Lanzhou Branch of the National Science Library, CAS. June 15, 2013. 
  140. ^ [1] Slate.com, 1 May 2015, "Blessed are the Climate Advocates"
  141. ^ "Reply to our Critics". Heartland Institute. Retrieved 31 December 2014. 
  142. ^ Bast, Joseph (April 13, 2007). "Welcome to The Heartland Institute!". Heartlander. The Heartland Institute. 
  143. ^ "Heartland Institute Funding". MediaTransparency. Retrieved June 22, 2010. 
  144. ^ Goldenberg, Suzanne (February 14, 2013). "How Donors Trust distributed millions to anti-climate groups". The Guardian. Retrieved March 5, 2015. 
  145. ^ "Foundation statement on Heartland Institute". Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation. Retrieved February 19, 2012. 
  146. ^ a b c Revkin, Andrew (March 8, 2009). "Skeptics Dispute Climate Worries and Each Other". New York Times. Retrieved September 2, 2010. 
  147. ^ Monica Heger, "ExxonMobil Cuts Back Its Funding for Climate Skeptics," IEEE Spectrum, July 2008 (Retrieved December 27, 2011)
  148. ^ Davies, Kert, "Exxon continued to fund climate denial in 2009", Greenpeace Blog, July 19, 2010. "[D]uring the same period where Exxon bent to the pressure on its campaign of denial and cut all funding to hard core deniers like the Competitive Enterprise Institute, the Heartland Institute, the George C. Marshall Institute and others...." Retrieved December 27, 2011.
  149. ^ The Battle Over Climate Science [2] PopSci June 21, 2012
  150. ^ "Reply to Our Critics". Heartland Institute. Retrieved 9 March 2015. 
  151. ^ a b c Adair, Bill (September 10, 2006). "Corporate spin can come in disguise". St. Petersburg Times. Retrieved September 3, 2010. 
  152. ^ "Heartland Institute Hires New Managing Editors for Four Public Policy Newspapers". Heartland Institute. Retrieved 19 January 2015. 
  153. ^ "Heartland Prospectus" (PDF). Heartland Institute. Retrieved 19 January 2015. 

External links[edit]

Coordinates: 41°52′54″N 87°38′11″W / 41.8816°N 87.6363°W / 41.8816; -87.6363