Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule. See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report. If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page. You must notify any user you have reported. You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. Additional notes When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first. The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from. Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection. Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed. Definition of edit warring Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring. Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR) An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions. Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Click here to create a new report

User:Mrnobody1997 reported by User:Midnightblueowl (Result: Blocked)

Page: British National Party (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mrnobody1997 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [1]
2. [2]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [3]

Comments: Last week, Mrnobody1997 received a 24 hour block for edit warring on the British National Party article, administered by User:EdJohnston. In the past 24 hours, they have returned to edit warring (albeit only once now twice) and disruptively editing on the same article. Midnightblueowl (talk) 11:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

No i haven't. What is your problem Midnightblueowl? Mrnobody1997 (talk) 21:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC) Mrnobody1997 Midnightblueowl you should be getting banned. You are basically reporting me every time i make an edit not allowing me to try and improve the article. But you can edit the article however you want it. I stopped reverting what you changed last week which resulted in me having a 24 hour ban. I'm not gonna revert that anymore. You should stop treating me like this. Mrnobody1997 (talk) 21:58, 25 June 2018 (UTC) Mrnobody1997 Administrators i haven't done anything wrong. I am just trying to improve the article. Midnightblueowl is trying to get me banned. Mrnobody1997 (talk) 22:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC) Mrnobody1997

@Mrnobody1997: You really need to figure out how Wikipedia works; you've been here for several months now. You are making poor quality edits to controversial pages, and then edit warring to get your way. If you do this, there will be sanctions. That's how Wikipedia works. On both your own talk page and the article talk page various editors have been patient and tried to explain things to you. Please take their advice on board. Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:33, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

You're trying to stop me edit by undoing edits i do. Mrnobody1997 (talk) 22:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC) Mrnobody1997 What edits have i done are poor quality? I'm trying to make the article better but you're trying to shut me down. Mrnobody1997 (talk) 22:39, 25 June 2018 (UTC) Mrnobody1997

I can appreciate that you are trying to make improvements, but realistically, many of your edits are not. This is not the place to discuss this issue, and it should also be noted that various editors have already pointed out to you why your edits have not been useful. Midnightblueowl (talk) 22:48, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked – 3 days. The user had only two reverts at the time this report was filed, but then they made two further reverts to reach a total of four, just in time for the closure. They should have realized this was a bad idea. Their attempt to explain their changes on the article talk page includes such wisdom as 'It was fine before' which isn't much of an explanation. Mrnobody1997, you should try to understand WP:Dispute resolution if you want to work on this kind of article. EdJohnston (talk) 23:57, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Shmurak reported by User:ВоенТех (Result: Declined)

Page: Revolution of Dignity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Shmurak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [4]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [5]
2. [6]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [7]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [8]

No dispute ever occured, the violator

1. simply deleted the talk page, redirecting it to other talk page,
2. reverted edits without any edit summary, which led me to suggest that it was a vandalism.

(Speaking frankly, anyone, who is able to use https://www.google.com/search can confirm that there is no room for dispute.)

I've applied to the WP:AIV,

User:Nyttend resolved that this is not a vandalism, and instead pointed out that this is definitely an edit warring.

By the way, the user is waging the same edit war at several other wiki-projects (though some were repelled quite recently and the IPs used are blocked), wikidata included.

Thank you for your time ladies and gentlemen. ВоенТех (talk) 13:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Comments:

• Declined @ВоенТех: Charges of vandalism, no attempts to discuss with other editor, no warnings to other editor, no WP:3RR violation, no notification of this report as is required... NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

User:DVdm (Result: Filer blocked)

User DVdm blocked his user page for avoiding 3RR — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0:79C9:FCFD:B4C2:F5FC (talk) 13:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

DVdm blocked no one, and protected nothing as he is not an admin. However, blocking you for repeatedly violating WP:NOTFORUM is becoming something that's increasingly likely. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

You must mistaken the person. N738139 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0:79C9:FCFD:B4C2:F5FC (talk) 14:16, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0:79C9:FCFD:B4C2:F5FC (talk · contribs · WHOIS) seems to be the one edit warring. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: this user (2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0:*) is a self-admitted blocked account: "my account was deleted for that reason". Was reported at wp:AIV. - DVdm (talk) 14:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Filer blocked per another report. EdJohnston (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

User:2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0:79C9:FCFD:B4C2:F5FC reported by User:Headbomb (Result: Blocked)

Page

Talk:Time dilation (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0:79C9:FCFD:B4C2:F5FC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 14:17, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847458031 by Headbomb (talk) wrong person"
2. 13:59, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847456721 by DVdm (talk) untrue"
3. 13:58, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847456528 by DVdm (talk) U don't need to respond, it is just a point!"
4. 13:56, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847456383 by DVdm (talk)"
5. 13:55, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847456040 by DVdm (talk) 3RR"
6. 13:52, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847455288 by DVdm (talk)"
7. 13:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847454487 by DVdm (talk) Trying to evade a discussion"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. User_talk:2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0:79C9:FCFD:B4C2:F5FC

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 14:12, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "WP:NOTFORUM"
2. 14:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Reverted 1 edit by 2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0:79C9:FCFD:B4C2:F5FC (talk): WP:NOTFORUM, taking you to 3RR. (TW)"

Comments:

Plus the above #User:DVdm section.Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked – Special:Contributions/2A02:1205:C6AC:53C0::/64 blocked 3 days for using the talk page as a WP:FORUM. EdJohnston (talk) 15:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Olsen24 reported by User:Mtattrain (Result: Indef)

Page: MTA Regional Bus Operations bus fleet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Olsen24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [9]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [10]
2. [11]
3. [12]
4. (it will happen again, check back in the article's revision history in a couple of hours)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [13]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [14]

Comments:
User has, for almost 2 years, tormented other users by reverting photos and stubbornly thinking that only his options are the best. User has been blocked many times for similar actions, but seems to not be listening. Mtattrain (talk) 14:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked indefinitely – Olsen24 has an extensive block log. With more than 2,000 edits and a two-year history, they have never posted to an article talk page. If they request unblock and promise to reform this might be considered. EdJohnston (talk) 15:11, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Corrected my closure -- in fact they do occasionally use article talk. EdJohnston (talk) 17:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

User:62.183.124.0/22 reported by User:Sigwald (Result: Block, Semi)

Page: Warhammer 40,000 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: mainly 62.183.124.0/22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) + other ip diapasons, see article revision history.

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [15]
2. [16]
3. [17]
4. [18]

Moreover there was attempt of globally changing Warhammer 40k articles in several language editions. See user: 62.183.125.17 global contributions.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: User:Tzeentch, Architect of Destiny is behind the edit warring. I've already tried to explain project rules about reliable sources and edit warring to him in ruwiki, as a result he is now indefinitely blocked by me there. --Sigwald (talk) 15:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked – The /22 range is blocked one month. Semiprotected the article two months. You might consider asking a steward for a global lock of the IP. EdJohnston (talk) 00:26, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

User:John from Idegon reported by User:Fhsig13 (Result: Declined This is an ongoing content dispute that is better handled through discussion (meaning talking with one another as opposed to at one another. Go back to the talk page and try it. If all fails take it to ANI, but try talking first.)

Page: Mark R. Isfeld Senior Secondary School (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: John from Idegon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_R._Isfeld_Senior_Secondary_School&oldid=847368536

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_R._Isfeld_Senior_Secondary_School&diff=847515199&oldid=847371330
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_R._Isfeld_Senior_Secondary_School&diff=847515199&oldid=847371330
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mark_R._Isfeld_Senior_Secondary_School&oldid=847515199

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: *Not existent, as I only just noticed the violations after returning from a hiatus.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Fhsig13 *Not the article's talk page, but this is where the editor in question chose to discuss it, although he merely reverted to lying, slandering, defamatory statements, and profanity.

Comments:
Although this may not be a 3RR violation, aside from the fact that the editor in question has reverted multiple edits at least three times in 24 hours, I believe it is still edit warring, and he has still become abusive, irate, and immature. For this, I feel punishment is necessary, as he is refusing to accept insight and is repeatedly attempting to publish information that has been proven false. I have also noticed from his talk page, that this actually the second WP:AN/EW report that has been filed against him, which I beleive is a factor that deserves consideration and involvement here, although he was not found guilty. Thank you for your time in reviewing this report. Fhsig13 (talk) 00:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

• Declined This is an ongoing content dispute that is better handled through discussion (meaning talking with one another as opposed to at one another. Go back to the talk page and try it. If all fails take it to ANI, but try talking first. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Therequiembellishere reported by User:Davey2116 (Result: Warned)

Page: Peter Welch (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Therequiembellishere (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: 1

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 06:13, 25 June 2018
2. 15:41, 25 June 2018
3. 15:56, 25 June 2018
4. 23:47, 25 June 2018

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: 01:16, 26 June 2018

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:
Davey2116 (talk) 01:16, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Where's the link to the talk page discussion attempt to resolve this dispute? Tarl N. (discuss) 01:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

FWIW, the practice is to not number the US presidents pro tempore. I believe this practice covers the state presidents pro tempores, as well. GoodDay (talk) 01:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Therequiembellishere is warned not to edit war. How amazing it is that there is no discussion on the talk page by either side. If people want to disagree about the numbering of office-holders, you'd think they would hold a centralized discussion. Or remember where those discussions have happened in the past, so they can link to them when editing. EdJohnston (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Capriaf reported by User:Volunteer Marek (Result: Protected)

Page: Kamala Harris (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Capriaf (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [19] Edit summary: "We all know you want her to be president in 2020. It isn't working. " (not sure who "we" refers to here)
2. [20] Edit summary: "STOP IGNORING HER COMMENTS WHERE SHE SAID IMMIGRANTS RAPE AND MURDER!" This is a WP:BLP violation and is also not supported by the source the user is trying to add
3. [21] Based on the edit summary this appears to be a WP:POINT violation ("if you don't let me put my BLP violations into the article, I won't let you have some other text in the article"
4. [22] Edit summary: "It’s controversial because she supports ICE, took money from Steve Mnuchin (Trumps Secretary of Treasury). I cited well sourced material on Mnuchin and it was taken down. Stop reverting and be fair. Either Mnuchin is up top or this is off. Be FUCKING CONSISTENT!" Multiple BLP violations in that edit summary.
5. [23] Ditto. This presumably references previous edits made by the same person using an IP address [24], which was also a BLP violation

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [25] This is a warning for edit warring on a previous occasion. In this instance the fast pace of reversions meant that nobody left a warning for this particular spate of edit warring. The user has also been previously blocked [26] for edit warring on a 1RR restricted article.

Here is a notification of Discretionary Sanctions in the topic area (although not necessary, since the user had previously been blocked and then unsuccessfully appealed the block based on DS [27])

Here is a warning about BLP and edit warring on this article.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [28]

Comments:

The article was fully protected by User:Muboshgu, however, since this is also a discretionary sanctions issue, and also a BLP issue, and considering the complete lack of any sign that the user plans to stop, as well as the evident WP:BATTLEGROUND attitude in the edit summaries, I thought this report was necessary.

In particular, in addition to making 5 reverts in less than 24 hours, the users edit violate BLP multiple times. In the first revert [29], they added BLP violating material based on a non-reliable source (a comedian's show). In the second revert [30] the user used a better source (sort of, Daily Beast) but the source doesn't actually support the claim. As mentioned above, the third revert [31] is a WP:POINT violation and the BLP violation is repeated in the edit summary. This is repeated in the fourth revert [32], with a new BLP violating accusation thrown in. Same is true in the fifth revert.

So you get a trifecta here: edit warring, BLP vios and BATTLEGROUND/incivility, all in an article from an area under discretionary sanctions.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

These problematic edits are not limited to Kamala Harris. See also recent edits on Steve Schmidt: "The tweet literally says he is aligned within the Democratic Party. In the tweet rant, he called for a blue wave. Stop fucking calling him an independent and learn to fucking comprehend reading"[[33]] and a diff removed from his Talk page asking him to stop edit-warring on Kyrie Irving. This seems like surprising behavior for a longterm editor so I wonder if the account was recently taken over by someone else. HouseOfChange (talk) 11:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Considering I made edits based on WHAT YOU all said I should, you are being inconsistent. You said no editorial. Bam. You said stick to the facts. I did. Why don’t you leave it the way I left it since I complied with your standards and you keep moving the goal post? Your conduct suggests you are trying to make Kamala Harris in better light. I have done similar edits for Hillary’s Clinton and they remain. What I did was not BLP violations. They are undisputed facts. How is the fact that a major campaign contributor was Steve Mnuchin, Trump’s Secretary of Treasury, not important when it relates directly to “she opposes Trump.” And the source I cited about her support for ICE, she bluntly says ICE should exist and that immigrants commit rape and murder. How can you rationally say the source didn’t work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Capriaf (talk • contribs) 07:37, June 26, 2018 (UTC)

• I don't see a violation. Here is my count:
  • Revert 1 was an addition of "Harris support ICE". It was reverted due to poor source.
  • Revert 2 was the same addition of "Harris support ICE" except with a better source. They are at 1RR.
  • Revert 3 is a removal "opposed Trump" which is a different item.
  • Revert 4 is a revert "opposed Trump". They are at 2RR.
  • Revert 5 is a revert "opposed Trump". They are at 3RR.
• They were not warned
• – Lionel^(talk) 23:21, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Page protected – 24 hours by User:Muboshgu. EdJohnston (talk) 03:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

@EdJohnston: I'm too WP:INVOLVED on this article to be in the appropriate position to adjudicate this long term. That's why I locked it for only 24 hours; I saw a fire on my watchlist and moved to put it out. I was hoping to force a talk page discussion, but I see that hasn't really happened. Do you think protection should be extended? – Muboshgu (talk) 03:34, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Capriaf was alerted to WP:ARBAP2 on 25 June, so if the problems continue, they are risking a sanction. Capriaf's edit summaries do leave something to be desired ("learn to fucking comprehend reading"). Capriaf constantly deletes all warnings from their talk, suggesting they don't have much interest in discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 03:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

I tried discussion but you all refuse to be consistent. I post something that related to Kamala opposing Trump, but you took it down. So to keep it consistent, I took down the opposition to Trump sentence. Now that it's not there, I am happy. Please stop being inconsistent. It comes off as defending her rather than being objective. She said on live national television that ICE exists to stop rapists and murderers. She said it on All in with Chris Hayes. I did not appreciate the reversions. You were being extremely inconsistent and I had to act.

 Comment: This whole discussion was removed by Capriaf (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=next&oldid=847695808), I don't think that was supposed to happen so I put it back. Alexis Jazz (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Tootifrooti11 reported by User:MBlaze Lightning (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page

Sino-Indian War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Tootifrooti11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 07:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847560284 by Capitals00 (talk)"
2. 06:32, 26 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847467657 by D4iNa4 (talk) IDC Only Hindutva brigade thinks India won. Boka You lost, accept it and get over it"
3. 14:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "It's okay if your friend calls it POV pushing, but you have a problem when I speak the same language. I don't gel with hypocrisy. Say sorry for your attacks, then ask for proposing."
4. 08:44, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 847403826 by MBlaze Lightning (talk) You are not POV-pushing Hindu nationalist? You do not run this place."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 15:38, 25 June 2018 (UTC) "Edit warring"
2. 06:49, 26 June 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Personal attack directed at a specific editor on Sino-Indian War. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

User:65.128.2.45 reported by User:Geraldo Perez (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page

Raven's Home (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

65.128.2.45 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 19:31, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
2. 18:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC) "Nominations"
3. 17:18, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
4. 17:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 18:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Raven's Home. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:38, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

User:2601:640:8101:82FE:2C5D:D4DC:6603:905B reported by User:Sparzival (Result: Range blocked)

Page: David Lynch (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2601:640:8101:82FE:2C5D:D4DC:6603:905B (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [34]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [35]
2. [36]
3. [37]
4. [38]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [39]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [40]

Comments:
I apologize if this is the inappropriate venue. User:Coryphantha warned the IP for vandalism for some of these edits, though I had a slightly different interpretation of them. Let me know if this would be better handled by the admins at AIV. Sparzival (talk) 20:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

They seemed to be a personal opinion that was not sourced, I did the best I could with it. The user was persistent and even changed his IP address probably thinking it wouldn't be noticed. I probably should've stepped aside and let another counter vandal user take over. Coryphantha Talk 20:05, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure, but it seems like one of those edge cases that could reasonably be considered vandalism. The IP actually is adding another Lynch quote, but it doesn't belong strung along to the first one and seems a little less notable. Regardless, they should have taken a pause and discussed... I'm a recently registered IP user, who uses mobile and has a dynamic IP. It's possible they didn't realize their IP address was changing, but that's something frequent IP editors have to be cognizant of in order to edit with our colleagues. Sparzival (talk) 20:10, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

I did undo my undo and left it for others to handle and will stay out of it. The text: "Our so-called leaders can’t take the country forward, can’t get anything done. Like children, they are. Trump has shown all this." did appear to be vandalism, so I apologize if it was meant to be a quote and I misunderstood. Coryphantha Talk 20:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Special:Contributions/2601:640:8101:82fe::/64 has been blocked 36 hours by User:Amorymeltzer for disruptive editing. The /64 is way over three reverts, and appears to have a warlike attitude judging from their edit summaries. EdJohnston (talk) 03:26, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

User:49.207.153.190 reported by User:The Mighty Glen (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page

Home network (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

49.207.153.190 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 19:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
2. Consecutive edits made from 19:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC) to 19:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
   1. 19:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
   2. 19:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
3. 19:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
4. 19:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
5. Consecutive edits made from 19:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC) to 19:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
   1. 19:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
   2. 19:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
   3. 19:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
6. 19:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""
7. 19:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 19:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Home network. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

This anon editor might have a language problem, judging from the writing, but their barely readable and incorrect additions (and unexplained deletions) have been reverted by several editors, with no response at their talk page. TMG^talk 20:14, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing as well as edit warring. The user's editing may indeed be well-intended, but since they have been unresponsive, it needs to be stopped at some point. Thank you for reporting, TMG. Bishonen | talk 20:26, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

User:116.68.76.120 and other IPs reported by User:91.110.126.210 (Result: Page protected)

Page: Winnie Harlow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 116.68.78.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 116.68.80.223 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 116.68.81.28 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 116.68.80.215 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 116.68.73.216 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 116.68.76.48 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 2405:204:D109:E810:784F:2569:2E1B:6238 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 116.68.76.120 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [41]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

Click to view diffs
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
User:116.68.76.48 [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] User:116.68.73.216 [48] [49] User:116.68.80.215 [50] User:116.68.81.28 [51] User:116.68.80.223 [52] User:116.68.78.24 [53] User:116.68.81.52 [54] User:2405:204:D109:E810:784F:2569:2E1B:6238 [55] [56] User:116.68.76.120 [57] Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [58]

Comments:
This is a series of edit reversions by an IP editor of a range of similar IP addresses. The information being inserted is a BLP violation and false. The information being inserted by the IP range is a smear against the subject of the article. Removing the BLP violating information is exempt from the 3RR as far as I read it and the continued insertion of such information is edit warring. 91.110.126.210 (talk) 21:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)}}

• Page protected NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:07, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Continuation

This is now being perpetuated by User:Yowlscam, who appears to be a single purpose account for the continuing of this edit war.

This diff and diff are identical edit to the IP edits. The editing began only after the report above was filed and the page was protected.

I would also like to draw attention to User:Domecroak. This diff is also an oddly specific revert.

The times of the above diffs are also both 07:28, 27 June 2018‎ and 07:37, 27 June 2018. This in a behaviour pattern of suspicion. 91.110.126.210 (talk) 08:39, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

• Update: NeilN had already applied a month of semiprotection, so I upgraded it to a month of WP:ECP. The edits by User:Yowlscam do cause concern. EdJohnston (talk) 13:45, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

• I've blocked Yowlscam for two weeks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:53, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Ju98 5 reported by User:Wind of freedom (Result: Warned)

Page: Template:Avianca (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Ju98 5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 11:04, 23 June 2018‎ Ju98 5 (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (1,755 bytes) (+71)‎ . . (Undid revision 835444684 by Wind of freedom (talk))
2. 16:38, 25 June 2018‎ Ju98 5 (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (1,820 bytes) (+136)‎ . . (Undid revision 847177403 by Wind of freedom (talk))
3. 21:42, 26 June 2018‎ Ju98 5 (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (1,820 bytes) (+136)‎ . . (Undid revision 847521747 by Wind of freedom (talk))
4. [diff]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [59]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:
I also asked him to stop in its talk page but he didn't care.--Wind of freedom (talk) 00:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

• Result: Warned for a long-term pattern of reverting without discussion. EdJohnston (talk) 20:32, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Bueller 007 reported by User:Joel B. Lewis (Result: Block, Semi)

Page: Paul Erdős (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Bueller 007 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [60]
2. [61]
3. [62]
4. [63]
5. [64]

Comments:
Hmm, templates, how do they work? Second try at leaving a comment: unambiguous 3RR violation, highly aggressive edit summaries, editor seems to believe calling other people "assholes" is a good substitute for BRD. (I have also violated 3RR I think, am happy to take my lumps, but am logging off now for 9 or 10 hours.) Edit to add: actually, an admin should take a look through the recent posts on their talk-page; serious behavioral issues here, 3RR is just the tip of the iceberg. --JBL (talk) 03:05, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Note: edit warring continued with a newly created account Boxedberg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bueller 007. - DVdm (talk) 14:41, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Blocked – 3 days. User:Bueller 007 has been mass-changing articles to add a template (in the lead sentence) that identifies the person as a fellow of the Royal Society. (For example, see this edit). Meanwhile, User:Boxedberg is a brand-new account that has been CU-blocked by User:Ponyo as a sock of WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Architect 134 rather than the aforementioned Bueller. Some people over at WikiProject Mathematics have begun the project of removing the Royal Society templates. So far there isn't an explanation of why Boxedberg would be making the same reverts as Bueller 007, though 'joe-jobbing' suggests they might have been trying to make Bueller 007 look bad. User:Dlohcierekim has semiprotected the Paul Erdős article. EdJohnston (talk) 20:18, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

User:Riyabakidkhar reported by User:Lorstaking (Result: )

Page: Dkhar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Riyabakidkhar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) aka 103.38.89.106 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [65]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 25 June
2. 25 June
3. 25 June
4. 26 June
5. 26 June

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [66] (after that he registered account to continue the edit war)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [67]

Comments: